13

Click here to load reader

Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Understanding MMR

Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff

1

Page 2: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

2

MMR Calculation Process

Page 3: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Initial Domain Calculations

3

Initial CalculationDomain

Proficiency Growth Gap Reduction1, 2 Graduation

Uses Making AYP Index Target

Individual Growth Z Score

Individual Growth Z Score

Making 4-, 5-, 6-Year Cohort Target

Includes3 Gr. 3 - 8 & 10/11 Gr. 4 - 8 & 10/11 Gr. 4 - 8 & 10/11 Gr. 12

Math & Reading Content Separate Scores Combined Combined Separate Scores

Combined Not Applicable

Minimum 1 subgroup 20 unique students 20 unique students 1 subgroup

SubgroupsNumber 1 to 9 Not Applicable 1 to 7 1 to 9Size 20 Students Not Applicable 1 Student 20 Students

Total Subscores 1 to 18 None 1 to 14 1 to 9

FormatAverage No Yes Yes NoWeighted Yes No Yes Yes

RangePotential 0 to 1 -3 to +3 -6 to +6 0 to 12012 Actual 0 to 1 -1.879517

to .9221142.03836941 to -0.95356057

0 to 1

1 Excludes school’s white students who are not FRP, not EL, and not Special Education2 Gap represents (State Comparative Subgroup Average Growth Z Score - School Subgroup's Average Growth Z Score) 3 For all domains, only includes students in statewide AYP calculations

Page 4: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Subject Group2010 Gap Reduction Target

(Statewide Average Growth Z Score)2011 Gap Reduction Target

(Statewide Average Growth Z Score)

M White 0.100917 0.084791

M Not LEP 0.076298 0.056210

M Not SPE 0.109655 0.081633

M Not FRP 0.137938 0.131457

R White 0.155419 0.160917

R Not LEP 0.134419 0.145836

R Not SPE 0.145441 0.175626

R Not FRP 0.195370 0.207400

2012 Used 2011 State Averages

Page 5: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

5

MMR Calculation Process2251 Schools Tested Students

1533 Schools Eligible for MMR

751 MMR Eligible Schools Designated Title I Schools in 2012

Page 6: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Category Criteria for Category Classification

Reward Highest 15% of Title I schools based on MMR

CelebrationTop performing schools in the range of 60 to 85 percentile of Title I schools based on MMR with successful state approved applications

Continuous Improvement

Lowest 25% of Title I schools based on MMR, not already identified as Focus or Priority

FocusLowest 10% of Title I schools based on FR or High schools with persistently low graduation rates based on 6-Year Cohort

Priority Lowest 5% of Title I schools based on MMR orSIG Schools

Title I School Classifications

6

Page 7: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Understanding Individual Growth Score

7

Expected Scale Score Following Year

Current Grade

Prior Year Scale Score

Mathematics Reading2011 2012 2010 2011 2012

4 350 444.37 451.25 448.12 448.12 448.12

5 450 543.55 547.22 551.75 551.75 551.75

6 550 644.51 650.77 648.77 648.77 648.77

7 650 745.21 750.87 749.38 749.38 749.38

8 750 846.04 851.68 850.98 850.98 850.98

11 or 10 850 1142.75 1142.75 1054.52 1054.52 1054.52

Page 8: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Understanding Individual Growth Score

8

Expected Scale Score Following Year

Current Grade

Prior Year Scale Score

Mathematics Reading

2011 2012 ALL

4 340 431.91 441.39 441.08

5 440 534.57 540.33 542.98

6 540 635.65 641.22 640.02

7 640 737.31 743.10 739.84

8 740 837.23 841.32 841.93

11 or 10 840 1129.95 1129.95 1046.40

Page 9: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Understanding Individual Growth Score

9

2012 Mathematics MCA-III or MCA-II Mean Growth Score Partially Meets the Standards Meets the Standards

Current Grade

Prior Year Scale Score

Target Used Observed

Prior Year Scale Score

Target Used Observed

4 340 441.39 431.33 350 451.25 444.34

5 440 540.33 534.17 450 547.22 543.58

6 540 641.22 635.19 550 650.77 644.25

7 640 743.10 737.55 650 750.87 745.34

8 740 841.32 836.20 750 851.68 846.58

Page 10: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

10

800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900

-3.0

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2012 Grade 8 Mathematics MCA-III Scale Score to Individual Growth Z ScoreIn

divi

dual

Gro

wth

Z S

core

Page 11: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

11

800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 890 900

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.02012 Grade 8 Reading MCA-II Scale Score to Individual Growth Z Score

Indi

vidu

al G

row

th Z

Sco

re

Page 12: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

• Sustain all students at same performance level or higher based on state accountability performance

• More than just sustaining same achievement level

Impacting MMR Gap Reduction

12

Page 13: Understanding MMR Dr. Margaret Biggerstaff 1. 2 MMR Calculation Process

Contact Information

Margaret Biggerstaff

[email protected]

651-582-8511

Minnesota Department of Education

1500 Highway 36 West

Roseville, MN 55113

2012 Minnesota Assessment Conference 13