Upload
others
View
100
Download
21
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)
UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM (TIER-II)
U.G. (B.TECH) – CIVIL ENGINEERING
FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION
National Board of Accreditation (NBA)
Anil Neerukonda Institute Of Technology & Sciences
(Autonomous)
(Permanently Affiliated to AU, Approved by AICTE, Accredited by NAAC with ‘A’ Grade) Sangivalasa-531162, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam Dt.
Phone: 08933-225083/84 Fax: 08933- 226395 Website: www.anits.edu.in email: [email protected]
2
CONTENTS
Item Description Page Nos.
PART-A Institutional Information 4
PART-B Criteria Summary 8
Program Level Cr iter ia
Criterion 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 9
Criterion 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 15
Criterion 3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 44
Criterion 4 Student ‘s Performance 76
Criterion 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 93
Criterion 6 Facilities and Technical Support 107
Criterion 7 Continuous Improvement 114
Institute Level Criteria
Criterion 8 First year Academics 132
Criterion 9 Student Support Systems 152
Criterion 10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources 163
PART-C Dec laration by the Instit ution 176
Annexures Annexure-1 to Annexure-20 177-222
3
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Description Page No.
1. Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) 178
2. Mid Exam Question Paper (Andhra University) 179
3. Mid Exam Question Paper (R15) 181
4. Project Review Circular 183
5. Project Work Evaluation proforma 184
6. External BoS (Civil) Members list 185
7. Industrial Training Viva Circular, Evaluation Form 186
8. Record of Attainment of Cos 2 to 8th Semesters (2nd to 4th year) 188
9. Exit Survey Form 196
10. Feedback from Parents form 197
11. Recruiters Feedback form 198
12. Faculty Information 199
13. Faculty Publications 207
14. Performance Appraisal Form 212
15. Academic Audit Form 217
16. Record of CO Attainment (I Year Courses CAY) 225
17. Counseling Batches CAY, CAY m1, CAY m2 227
18. Students Feedback Form with Cover letter 230
19. Organization chart and Administration set up 232
20. Grievance Redressal Committee Members 233
4
Part A
1. Name and Address of the Institution
Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences Sangivalasa Bheemunipatnam Mandal Visakhapatnam District – 531 162
Andhra Pradesh, India
2. Name and Address of Affiliating University
Andhra University Visakhapatnam - 530 003,
Andhra Pradesh, India.
3. Year of establishment of the Institution:
2001-02
4. Type of the Institution:
Autonomous
5. Ownership Status:
Self Financing (Society)
Anil Neerukonda Educational Society
Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Mandal,
Visakhapatnam District-531162
Andhra Pradesh India
Society Regd. Number 2314 of 2000
6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:
Table A.6
Name of the Institution Year of
Establishment Programs of
Study Location
American NRI College of Nursing 2008 Nursing Sangivalasa Bheemunipatnam Mandal VISAKHAPATNAM– 531 162 Andhra Pradesh, India
NRI Institute of Medical Sciences (MBBS)
2012 MBBS
Anil Neerukonda Institute of Dental Sciences
2013 Dental
5
7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
S. No.
Program Name
Name of the Dept.
Year of
Start
Intake Increase in
intake
Year of increase
Year of initial AICTE
approval
Accreditation Status
Accreditation Period
1 UG - B.Tech.
ECE 2001 60 120 180
2005 2014
2001
Granted accreditation for three years.
June, 2016-June, 2019
2 UG - B.Tech.
EEE 2001 40 60
120 180
2002 2009 2014
2001
3 UG - B.Tech.
CSE 2001 60 120 180
2008 2015
2001
4 UG - B.Tech.
INF 2001 60 120 180
2015 2017
2001
5 UG - B.Tech.
MEC 2005 60 120 180 240
2009 2014 2015
2005
6 UG - B.Tech.
CIV 2011 60 NA NA 2011 Applying first time
---
7 UG - B.Tech.
CHE 2012 60 NA NA 2012 Applying first time
---
8 PG - MTECH.
CST 2010 18 NA NA 2010
Not accredited
---
9 PG - MTECH
Control Systems
2010 18 NA NA 2010 ---
10 PG - MTECH
Communication Systems
2011 18 NA NA 2011 ---
11 PG - MTECH
Machine Design
2012 18 NA NA 2012 ---
12 PG - MTECH
Soil Mechanics 2017 18 NA NA 2017 ---
8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:
S.
No.
Level Discipline Program
1 Under Graduate Engineering & Technology Civil Engineering
2 Under Graduate Engineering & Technology Chemical Engineering
6
9. Total number of employees in the institution:
a) Regular Employees (Faculty and Staff):
Items
Gen
der
CAY (2018-19)
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
CAYm3 (2015-16)
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Teaching staff in Engineering M 143 153 134 142 112 124 102 111
F 70 73 72 79 67 72 57 62
Teaching faculty in Science and Humanities
M 25 27 23 25 24 24 22 24
F 20 21 21 24 20 22 19 22
Non- Teaching staff M 98 107 115 118 111 119 108 119
F 26 32 32 36 32 39 22 28
b) Contractual* Employees (Faculty and Staff):
Items
Gen
der
CAY (2018-19)
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
CAYm3 (2015-16)
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Teaching staff in Engineering
M 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
F 0 0 - - - - - -
Teaching faculty in Science and Humanities
M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
F 0 0 - - - - - -
Non- Teaching staff M 0 0 - - - - - -
F 0 0 - - - - - -
10. Total number of Engineering Students:
Engineering and Technology – UG Shift – 1
Items CAY
2018-19
CAYm1
2017-18
CAYm2
2016-17
CAYm3
2015-16
Total No. of Boys 3147 2923 2534 2242
Total No. of Girls 1239 1261 1201 1101
Total 4386 4184 3735 3343
7
Engineering and Technology – PG Shift – 1
Items CAY
2018-19
CAYm1
2017-18
CAYm2
2016-17
CAYm3
2015-16
Total No. of Boys 27 27 23 45
Total No. of Girls 20 22 22 34
Total 47 49 45 79
11. Vision of the Institution:
ANITS envisions to emerge as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good
blend of technological excellence and the best of human values.
12. Mission of the Institution:
To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent
communicational skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic
technical education using the best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise
and an exemplary work culture, besides molding them into good citizens.
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
Head of the Institution & NBA Coordinator
Name : Prof. T. V. Hanumantha Rao Designation : Principal Mobile No : 09441011735, 07330789892 Fax : 08933 226395 Email ID : [email protected]
8
Part B Criteria Summary
Name of the Program: B.Tech. (U.G.) CIVIL ENGINEERING
Criteria No.
Criter ia Marks /Weightage
Program Level Cr iter ia
1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning
Processes 120
3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120
4 Student ‘s Performance 150
5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200
6 Facilities and Technical Support 80
7 Continuous Improvement 50
Institute Level Criteria
8 First year Academics 50
9 Student Support Systems 50
10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources
120
Total 1000
9
CRITERION 1 Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60) 1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5) (Vision statement typically indicates aspirations and Mission statement states the broad
approach to achieve aspirations) (Here Institute Vision and Mission statements have been asked to ensure consistency with
the department Vision and Mission statements; the assessment of the Institute Vision and
Mission will be taken up in Criterion 10)
Vision and Mission of the department
Vision
Our Vision is to be among the pre -eminent Civil Engineering Departments of the Country and the
World for building future Civil Engineers characterized by technological excellence and human values.
Mission
Our Mission is Education. We achieve this mission through teaching, research, and consultancy in Civil
Engineering with creativity, quality, sustainability, service and values as the foundational hall marks.
Vision and Mission of the institute
Vision:
ANITS envisions to emerge as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good blend
of technological excellence and the best of human values.
Mission:
To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent communi cational
skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic technical education
using the best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise and an exemplary work
culture, besides moulding them into good citizens.
1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5) (State the PEOs (3 to 5) of program seeking accreditation)
Program Educational Objectives (PEOs)
The Program is expected to enable the students, within 3 to 5 years of their graduation, to:
1. Engage successfully in the practice of civil engineering profession within industry, government, or
through private practice, post-graduate studies or alternate career paths.
2. Analyze, design and build safe, sustainable and economical civil engineering structures by applying
their knowledge in one or more of the major areas of civil engineering, including environmental,
geotechnical, structural, transportation, and water resources.
3. Apply the knowledge of mathematics, basic science, core and civil engineering to the formulation
and solution of complex engineering problems as members of multidisciplinary teams.
4. Develop their communication skills and leadership skills and become competent, ethical and
responsible professionals
5. Engage in life-long learning and service to their profession for betterment of society and environment
10
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
(Describe where (websites, curricula, posters etc.) the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published
and detail the process which ensures awareness among internal and external stakeholders with effective process implementation)
(Internal stakeholders may include Management, Governing Board Members, faculty,
support staff, students etc. and external stakeholders may include employers, industry, alumni,
funding agencies, etc.)
The vision, mission and PEOs, along with POs, are published and disseminated among the stake
holders through various avenues as given in Table B 1.3. This is expected to ensure awareness
among internal and external stake holders.
Table B 1.3 Publication and dissemination of Vision, Mission and PEOs (along with POs)
S. No.
Where published/disseminated Target stake holders
1 Institute/Department website
(http://civil.anits.edu.in)
Students, parents, faculty; alumni, Industry,
Management.
2 Annual Symposium website
(http://vinirmithi.anitscivil.edu.in)
Students, parents, faculty; alumni, industry.
3 Prospectus Management, Governing Body Members,
faculty, students and parents.
4 Syllabus book Students, Faculty, Parents, M anagement,
Governing Body Members, BoS (Civil)
Members, Academic council members.
5 College annual magazine (ECHOES) Students, Faculty, Parents, Management
6 Civil Engineering News Letter Students, Faculty, Parents, Industry,
Alumni, Employers, Management,
Governing Body Members, BoS (Civil)
Members, Department Advisory committee
members.
7 Display boards:
Department Main corridor, notice board,
HOD cabin, Faculty cabins, Laboratories
Students, Parents, Faculty, Industry,
Support staff, Management and Alumni.
8 e-mail Employers, Industry, Alumni, Funding
agencies, Governing Body Members, Board
of Studies Members, Academic Council
9 Interaction meetings:
Faculty Meetings, HOD’s interaction with
support staff and students.
Faculty, Support Staff, Students.
11
S. No.
Where published/disseminated Target stake holders
10 Department Profile (PPT):
NAAC, NBA, Autonomous, AU Affiliation
Committee Visits, Department Advisory
Committee Meetings, other
academic/professional activities in the
Department.
Andhra University, NAAC, NBA, UGC,
Industry
1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the
program (25)
(Articulate the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the department and PEOs of the
program)
The process for defining Vision and Mission of the Department and PEOs of the program is illustrated
in Fig. B 1.4.
Vision, Mission and PEOs of the Department are evolved by review and ratification by the Department
Academic Planning and monitoring committee based on
(i) Vision and Mission of the Institute,
(ii) Vision, Mission and PEOs of reputed Institutions such as MIT downloaded from Google
(iii) NBA - Program Outcomes
And also based on feedback obtained from
i) inspections by AU Affiliation, NAAC and UGC Autonomous Committees
ii) Recruiters and Employers,
iii) Principal/Management
iv) Parents, Alumni
And HoD’s interaction meetings with
i) BoS (Civil) members,
ii) Department Advisory committee meetings
iii) industry experts delivering guest lectures
iv) Brainstorming sessions in faculty meetings
v) students and staff
Periodic review of vision, mission and PEOs is made annually through the Brainstorming sessions in faculty
meetings and ratified by the Academic Planning and monitoring Committee.
12
Fig B.1.4: Process for defining Vision, Mission and PEOs
1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15) (Generate a “Mission of the Department – PEOs matrix” with justification and rationale of the Mapping) Note: In this document wherever the term ‘Process’ has been used its meaning is process
formulation, notification and implementation.
The Mission of the Department-PEOs matrix is presented in Table B 1.5 below
13
Table B 1.5 Program PEOs-Department Mission Matrix
PEO Statements M1: Education
M2: Teaching
M3: Research
M4: Consultancy in
Civil Engineering
M5: Creativity
M6: Quality
M7: Sustainability
M8: Service and
values
1. Engage successfully in the practice of civil
engineering profession within industry,
government, or through private practice, post-
graduate studies or alternate career paths.
3 3 1 1 2 3 2 2
2. Analyze, design and build safe, sustainable and
economical civil engineering structures by applying
their knowledge in one or more of the major areas
of civil engineering, including environmental,
geotechnical, structural, transportation and water
resources.
3 3 1 2 2 3 3 1
3. Apply the knowledge of mathematics, basic
science, core and civil engineering to the
formulation and solution of complex engineering
problems as members of multidisciplinary teams.
3 3 2 2 2 3 1 -
4. Develop their communication skills and leadership
skills and become competent, ethical and
responsible professionals
3 3 - - 2 3 1 3
5. Engage in life-long learning and service to their
profession for betterment of society and
environment
3 3 2 2 2 3 2 3
Legend: 1: Slight (Low); 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High) “-”: there is no correlation
14
Justification and Rationale 1) Education (M1) and Teaching (M2) are the two core elements of the Department Mission and
strongly correlate with all the PEOs of the program.
2) Research (M3) activity of the faculty members percolating into the T-L process slightly contributes to the PEO1 and PEO2, while it moderately contributes to realize the PEO3 and PEO5
3) Consultancy (M4) activity of the faculty contributes to PEO1 slightly, while it moderately helps to realize PEO2, PEO3 and PEO5.
4) Creativity (M5) in Teaching, Research and Consultancy moderately helps to achieve all PEOs of the program.
5) Sustained Quality (M6) in all the Activities of the Department when maintained substantially contributes to realization of all PEOs of the program.
6) The recent concept of sustainability (M7) correlates with PEO2 substantially, PEO1 & PEO5 moderately and other PEOs slightly.
7) Service and values (M8), another set of key elements of the Department Mission, help to realize the PEO4 & PEO5 substantially, PEO1 moderately and PEO2 slightly.
15
CRITERION 2 Program Curriculum and Teaching – Learning Processes 120
2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120)
2.1. Program Curriculum (20)
2.1.1. State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for attaining
the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure-1. Also mention the
identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
(State the process details; also mention identified curricular gaps)
Process Details
ANITS is affiliated to Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, and hence the syllabus/curriculum prescribed by
the university is followed. Andhra University is one of the oldest (estd.1926) and renowned universities
and among the top ranking (NIRF 2018: 36) universities in the country. Generally Curriculum maintains the
balance in the composition of Basic Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences including Management
courses, Engineering Sciences, Professional core and elective courses, Project work and industrial training
Courses.
The institute was accorded Autonomous status by UGC with effect from the Academic year 2015-16
(CAYm3). The regulations followed in the last three academic years is shown in Table B 2.1.1a
Table B 2.1.1a
Year of the B.Tech Program
Applicable Academic Regulations
CAYm2 (2016-17) CAYm1 (2017-18) CAY (2018-19)
I Year Autonomous Regulations R15
Autonomous Regulations R15
Autonomous Regulations R15
II Year Autonomous Regulations R15
Autonomous Regulations R15
Autonomous Regulations R15
III Year Andhra University Regulations R14
Autonomous Regulations R15
Autonomous Regulations R15
IV Year Andhra University Regulations R07
Andhra University Regulations R14
Autonomous Regulations R15
The process used to identify the extent of compliance of University curriculum for attaining POs and PSOs
i.e., the process to identify the curricular gaps is illustrated in Fig. B 2.1.1.
The extent of compliance of the University curriculum for attaining POs and PSOs is assessed based on
1) Feedback given by Recruiters in Campus Placements and by prospective Employers
2) Inputs given by Principal/Management in HoDs’ meetings
3) Feedback given by visiting expert committee members during University Affiliation inspection,
NAAC accreditation, UGC Autonomous inspection, NBA accreditation of other department
programs
4) Feedback given by industry experts visiting for guest lectures / technical fests/ Workshops/ other
events organized by the Department from time to time
5) Feedback given by external examiners from Andhra University during End semester practical
examinations
16
6) Feedback by visiting expert members during Department Advisory Committee meetings
7) Feedback given by faculty members handling the courses or attending FDPs/ STTPs
8) Feedback given by students in exit surveys
9) Feedback given by alumni
Fig. B 2.1.1 Process for Identification of Curricular gaps
The feedback obtained as above is reviewed in faculty meetings in general and Academic planning and
monitoring committee of the Department in particular and the curricular gaps are identified. The curricular
gaps, as shown in Table B 2.1.1b , belong to one or more of the following categories:
(I) The students exhibit inadequate aptitude and communication skills (PO1, PO2, PO10, PSO1,
PSO2)
(II) The students exhibit inadequate knowledge of certain topics in Civil Engineering (PO2, PSO1)
(III) The students are unable to adequately apply their knowledge to practical problems due to
inadequate exposure to real-time construction projects (PO6, PO7, PSO3)
(IV) There is need for providing exposure to students in using equipment or software currently
used in the industry (PO5, PSO2)
17
Table B 2.1.1b Curricular Gaps Identified
S. No.
Gap Identified Relevance to
POs PSOs I Inadequate aptitude and communication skills 2,3,4,9,10,12 1,2
II
Topics in civil engineering not covered in each course in the curriculum. The list is exhaustive and these topics covered by respective faculty members are included in Table B 2.1.2B
All All Courses not covered in the curriculum such as Engineering economics and finance (included in Autonomous Regulations R15)
III Inadequate ability to apply theory to practical problems
2 to 8, 11,12 1,2,3 Lack of Exposure to real time construction projects or practical problems
IV Exposure to Equipment and software currently used in the industry
5 2
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs and PSOs (10)
The activities, which are in place in the Department for bridging the curricular gaps so as to attain POs and PSOs, are illustrated in Table B 2.1.2a
Table B 2.1.2a Activities for bridging the Curricular gaps
S. No.
Activities in place in the Department for bridging the Curricular gaps
Nature of curricular gap
Relevance to POs/ PSOs
I II III IV
1 Additional course “English lab” in I Year √ PO10, PSO2
2 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude classes for III year students
√ PO1, PO2, PSO3
3 Campus Recruitment Training Classes by T&P Cell √ PO1, PO2, PSO3
4 Organizing Workshops/Guest Lectures/Symposia for students
√ √ √ √ All POs and PSOs
5 Student seminars on recent technologies √ √ √ √ PO2 to PO7, PO10 to PO12, All PSOs
6 Student participation in Workshops/Symposia at other institutes
√ √ √ √ PO2 to PO7, PO10 to
PO12, All PSOs
7 Industrial visits √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
8 Coverage of Topics beyond curriculum by faculty in each subject
√ √ PO2-PO7, PO10-PO12, All PSOs
9 Faculty seminars on topics from research journals √ √ √ PO2-PO7, PO10, PO12, All PSOs
10 Civil Engineering News letter √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
11 Wall Paper √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
12 Student Paper publications √ √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
13 College Annual Magazine √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
18
S. No.
Activities in place in the Department for bridging the Curricular gaps
Nature of curricular gap
Relevance to POs/ PSOs
I II III IV
14 Project work with recent technologies √ √ √ PO2 to PO7
15 Pedagogical initiatives by faculty (see Fig. B 2.2.1b) √ √ PO2 to PO5, PO7, PO12, PSO1, PSO2
16 Organizing FDPs/Workshops for faculty √ √ PO2 to PO7
17 Faculty participation in FDPs/STTPs/Conferences √ √ PO2 to PO7
18 Faculty Research & Consultancy √ √ PO2 to PO7
19 Use of Internet by students for browsing journals, NPTEL courses, e-books and other Google resources
√ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
20 Solving GATE problems by students √ √ All POs, All PSOs
21 Special classes in GATE √ √ All POs, All PSOs
22 On-line GATE exams √ √ All POs, All PSOs
23 Interaction with Alumni √ √ √ All POs, All PSOs
24 Procurement of latest Equipment/Software √ PO5, PSO2
25 NSS programs √ PO6 to PO12, PSO2, PSO3
26 Student Club activities √ PO8, PO9, PO10, PO12, PSO2
27 Games and Sports events √ PO8, PO9, PO10, PSO2
Legend: Nature of Curricular gap:
(I) The students exhibit inadequate aptitude and communication skil ls (PO1, PO2, PO10, PSO1, PSO2)
(II) The students exhibit inadequate knowledge of c ertain topics in Civil Engineering (PO2, PSO1)
(III) The students are unable to adequately apply their knowledge to practical problems due to inadequate
exposure to real -time construction projects (PO6, PO7, PSO3)
(IV) There is need for providing exposure to students in using equipment or software currently used in the
industry (PO5, PSO2)
Details of Delivery of the Content beyond the syllabus through these activities for attainment of the
relevant POs and PSOs for the last three academic years are provided in Table B 2.1.2b along with the
relevant POs/PSOs
19
Tables B 2.1.2b Delivery details of the Content beyond the syllabus
CAY 2018 – 19
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
1 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment Training
11-06-2018 to 16-06-2018
ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1
2 Clay mineralogy and soil structure (Geotechnical Engineering-I)
Faculty Seminar 11-07-2018 Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS
98 1,2 1
3 Beam column joints (Steel Structures)
Faculty Seminar 23-07-2018 MKSSK Chaitanya
78 1,2 1
4 Yield line analysis of slab (Reinforced Concrete Structures – I)
Faculty Seminar 31-07-2018
J Vikranth
97 1,2 1
5 Axial thrust diagram for beams (Strength of Materials)
Faculty Seminar 03-08-2018 J Vikranth
89 1,2 1
6 Analysis of multi-storey frames by approximate methods. (Structural Analysis – II)
Faculty Seminar 04-08-2018 PVRK Reddy
77 1,2 1
7 Aptitude & Verbal Skills Musigma CRT Classes
04-08-2018 ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1
8 Career Orientation Career Options after Engineering
10-08-2018 Mr.Vamsi, Director Global Edge
100 1,2 1
9 Calculation of wind speed and wind pressure (Steel Structures)
Faculty Seminar 20-08-2018 MKSSK Chaitanya
84 1,2 1
10 Aptitude & Verbal Skills TCS Specific Training
27-08-2018 to 01-09-18
ANITS QA/VA Faculty 80 1 1
11 Analysis of fixed parabolic arches (Structural Analysis – II)
Faculty Seminar 07-09-2018 PVRK Reddy
79 1,2 1
12 Aptitude & Verbal Skills Infosys Specific Training
10-09-2018 to 15-09-2018
ANITS QA/VA Faculty 60 1 1
20
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
13 Industrial Exposure
Industrial Visit to Thotapalli Reservior, Parvathipuram.
22-09-2018
Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Premchand, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS
88 6,7,9,12 2,3
14 Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASBR) (Environmental Engineering –II)
Faculty Seminar 26-09-2018 J H V Reddy
94 1,2 1
15 Hierarchy of Management (Project Planning & Management)
Faculty Seminar 29-09-2018 T. V. Viswa Teja
71 11 -
16 Slip form Technique (Building Technology)
Faculty Seminar 01-10-2018 Ch.Srinivas
80 1,2 1
17 Breakwater Curves (Transportation Engineering – II)
Faculty Seminar 04-10-2018 T. Kiran Kumar
85 1,2 1
18 Reinforcement detailing for slabs, beams, columns and footings. (Reinforced Concrete Structures – I)
Faculty Seminar 05-10-2018 J Vikranth
83 1,2 1
19 Career planning and prospects in atomic energy
Seminar organized by T&P Cell
08-11-2018 Dr. Sajid, Scientist of BARC (Hyderabad)
100 1,2 1
20 Improving rock stability and quality - rock reinforcement. (Ground Improvement Techniques)
Faculty Seminar 18-12-2018 Ch Vineel
58 1,2 1
21 Soil Nailing Technique for Infrastructure Development
Key Note Address in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018 Dr. G L Siva Kumar Babu, Professor of Civil Engg., I.I.Sc. Bengaluru
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
22 Risk Management in Geotechnical Engineering Projects: A few Case studies
Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018 Dr. A Santharam, Professor, ANITS
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
21
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
23 Pavement Construction in Expansive soils
Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018
Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy Professor of Civil Engg., Andhra University
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
24 Land, Offshore and Sub-sea Investigations and Solutions
Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018 Sri Srinivasa Raju, CEO, Geomardy, Visakhapatnam
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
25 Fly ash Utilization for Infrastructure Development
Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018 Dr.B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor & Head, Civil, ANITS
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
26 Analysis & Design of Excavation Supporting Systems using Diaphragm Wall: Case Studies
Guest Lecture in Workshop on Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development
29-12-2018
Sri. Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India, Chennai
65 1,2,4,12 1,2
27 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment training
03-01-2019 ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1
28 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering – I)
Faculty Seminar 09-01-2019 T. Kiran Kumar
89 1,2 1
29 Aptitude Skills Campus Recruitment training
23-01-19 to 25-01-19
ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1
22
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
30 Industrial Exposure
Industrial Visit to RERW Construction site near Anandapuram
24-01-2019 Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS
100 6,7,9,12 2,3
31 Design of pile cap for two piles (Reinforced Concrete Structures – II)
Faculty Seminar 30-01-2019 J Vikranth
77 1,2 1
32
AutoCAD aided explanation for Long wall and short wall method for Estimation (Estimation & Costing)
Faculty Seminar 16-02-2019 T. V. Viswa Teja
65
5 2
33 Industrial Exposure
Industrial Visit to Polavaram Irrigation Project, west Godavari District, A.P.
19-02-2019
Sri. M.Premchand, J.Harshavardhana ready, M.Nagalakshmi, Assistant Professors, ANITS
81 6,7,9,12 2,3
34 AutoCAD aided explanation for Centre line method for Estimation (Estimation & Costing)
Faculty Seminar 20-02-2019 T. V. Viswa Teja
85 5 2
35 Reclaimed soils, land fill gas, Leachate – land fill liners (Ground Improvement Techniques)
Faculty Seminar 26-02-2019 Ch Vineel
61 1,2 1
36 Introduction to remote sensing (Surveying – II)
Faculty Seminar 02-03-2019 PVRK Reddy
44 1,2 1
37 Critical depth for pile foundations (Geotechnical Engineering -II)
Faculty Seminar 11-03-2019 Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS
66 1,2 1
38 Rain water harvesting (Environmental Engineering –I)
Faculty Seminar 15-03-2019 PVR Sravya
87 1,2 1
23
Tables B 2.1.2b Delivery details of the Content beyond the syllabus
CAYm1 2017 – 18
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
1 Employability skills Orientation on Co-Cubes Assessments
28-06-2017 Aon-CoCubes representatives
100 1 1
2 Rain gauge stations in Visakhapatnam (Water Resources Engineering -I)
Faculty Seminar 03-07-2017 Sri Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
77 1,2 1
3 Clay mineralogy and soil structure (Geotechnical Engineering-I)
Faculty Seminar 19-07-2017 Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS
96 1,2 1
4 Attitude, Professionalism, response dynamics, Inter personal skills
Seminar organized by T&P Cell
16-08-2017 to 24-08-2017
Focus Academy for Career Enhancement (FACE)
100 1 1
5 Aptitude Skills
Infosys Specific Campus Recruitment Training
5-09-2017 to 19-09-2017
ANITS QA/VA Faculty 100 1 1
6 Geotechnical Investigation at Shivalik Mountain Range
Guest Lecture 15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines
84 1,2,4,12 1,2
7 Environmental quality indices (Environmental Impact Assessment)
Faculty Seminar 18-09-2017 Sri J.Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS
91 1,2 1
8 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering -I)
Faculty Seminar 22-09-2017 Sri. T. Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS
89 1,2 1
9 Geotechnical Challenges in Marine Environment
Key-note address in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust
59 1,2,4,12 1,2
24
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
10 Integrated Geotechnical Investigations for Civil Engineering Problems – Some Case studies
Guest Lecture in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. V Venkateswara Rao (Retd), Andhra University
59 1,2,4,12 1,2
11 Geotechnical Aspects of Design and Construction of Tunnels
Guest Lecture in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam
59 1,2,4,12 1,2
12 Case Studies on Bearing Capacity failures
Guest Lecture in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University
59 1,2,4,12 1,2
13 Fly Ash : Solid Waste Management
Guest Lecture in One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. B N D Narasinga Rao, ANITS(A)
59 1,2,4,12 1,2
7 Macro and micro structure of EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment)
Faculty Seminar 12-10-2017 Sri J.Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS
91 1,2 1
14 Air Pollution Sources and Control Options
Guest Lecture 24-10-2017
Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam
100 4,7,11 1,3
15 E-Tabs Software A Two-day workshop on ‘E-Tabs’
13-12-2017 to 14-12-2017
Data Pro, Visakhapatnam 67 2,5,7,12 1,2,3
16 Heirarchy & 5R of SWM (Solid Waste Management)
Faculty Seminar 19-12-2017 Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS
74 1,2 1
25
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
17 Methods of Estimating solid waste quantity (Solid Waste Management)
Faculty Seminar 26-12-2017
Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS
74 1,2 1
17 Reclaimed Soils, Land fill gas, Leachate-Landfill liners. (Ground Improvement Techniques)
Faculty Seminar 18-01-2018 Sri. Ch.Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
76 1 1
18 Failure of Prestressed concrete beams (Prestressed Concrete)
Faculty Seminar 14-02-2018 Sri. K.Suryanarayana, Assistant Professor, ANITS
71 1,2 1
19 Industry exposure
Industrial Visit to Water and Sewage Treatment Plants at Narava and Town kotha road, Visakhapatnam
24-02-2018
Sri J. Harshavardhan Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS P Vandana Rao, Assistant Professor, ANITS
84 6,7,9,12 2,3
20 Design of pile cap for two piles (Reinforced Concrete Structures - II)
Faculty Seminar 27-02-2018 Sri. J Vikranth, Associate Professor, ANITS
87 1,2 1
21 Breakwater curves (Transportation Engineering - II)
Faculty Seminar 05-03-2018 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, AssistantProfessor, ANITS
69 1,2 1
22 Methods of Estimating Strength of solid waste (Solid Waste Management)
Faculty Seminar 08-03-2018 Sri. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor, ANITS
74 1,2 1
17 Geo-referencing (RS & GIS Applications in Civil Engineering)
Faculty Seminar 19-03-2018 Sri. Ch.Srinivas, Assistant Professor, ANITS
93 1,2,5 1,2
23 Whiskbroom and push broom sensors (RS & GIS Applications in Civil Engineering)
Faculty Seminar 21-03-2018 Sri. Ch.Srinivas, Assistant Professor, ANITS
93 1,2,5 1,2
23 Introduction to Photogrammetric Surveying (Surveying - II)
Faculty Seminar 23-03-2018 Sri. T.V.ViswaTeja, Assistant Professor, ANITS
90 1,2, 1,2
24 Traffic Signal Design and Marshall Mix Design (Transportation Engineering - I)
Faculty Seminar 24-03-2018 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS
96 1,2 1
26
S. No
Curricular Gap Delivery beyond the syllabus
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
25 Critical depth for pile foundations (Geotechnical Engineering -II)
Faculty Seminar 27-03-2018 Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS
93 1,2 1
26 Rheology of Concrete; Deterioration of concrete and its prevention (Concrete Technology)
Faculty Seminar 29-03-2018 Sri. K.Suryanarayana, Assistant Professor, ANITS
97 1,2 1
27 Career Orientation Seminar organized by T&P Cell
28-04-2018 Bharath Paladugu, Director, Himma International Academy
100 1,2 1
27
Tables B 2.1.2b Delivery details of the Content beyond the syllabus
CAYm2 2016-17
S. No
Gap Action taken Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
1 Planning and Construction of New Capital of Andhra Pradesh
Guest Lecture 09-07-2016 Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, CRDA, Amaravathi
67 6,7,9,12 2,3
2 Major Irrigation Projects and Interlinking of Rivers
Guest Lecture 15-07-2016
Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam
84
6,7,9,12 2,3
3 Career Awareness for Engineering Graduates
Seminar organized by T&P Cell
18-07-2016
Mr Mohamed Abdullah,Director of Conduira Education and Service Ltd
100 1,2 1
4 Speed maths Wide Open workshop on Speed maths (WOWS)
23-07-2016 to 24-07-2016
Focus Academy for Career Enhancement (FACE)
100 1,2 1
5 Industrial Exposure
Industrial Visit to Water and Sewage Treatment Plants at Narava and Town kotha road, Visakhapatnam
05-08-2016 Sri. M.K.S.S.K. Chaitanya, V Leela Manusha, Sri.Ch Vineel, Assistant Professors, ANITS
60 6,7,9,12 2,3
6 Higher Studies in US (MBA & MS) Seminar organized by T&P Cell
15-09-2016 International Knowledge Center
100 1,2 1
7
Rain water harvesting,Rain gauge stations in and around visakhapatnam (Water Resources Engineering -I)
Faculty Seminar 24-06-2016 Sri. Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
62 1,2 1
8 Clay mineralogy and soil structure (Geotechnical Engineering-I)
Faculty Seminar 05-07-2016 Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao, Professor and Head, Civil, ANITS
93 1,2 1
9 Estimation of Septic tank (Estimating & Quantity Surveying)
Faculty Seminar 09-08-2016 Sri. Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
96 1,2 1
28
S. No
Gap Action taken Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation
% of Students
Relevance to
POs PSOs
10 Loads on braced members (Steel Structures- I)
Faculty Seminar 20-09-2016 Sri. M K S S K Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS
93 1,2 1
11 Traffic Signal Design and Mrshall Mix Design Introduction (Transportation Engineering -I)
Faculty Seminar 21-09-2016 Sri. T. Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS
82 1,2 1
12 Geotechnical Applications in Civil Engineering
ASCE ANITS Students Chapter Inaugural Lecture
01-10-2016 Dr. SivakumarBabu, Professor, Civil Engg,
I.I.Sc., Bangalore 100 1,2 1
13 Introduction to working stress method (Reinforced Concrete Structures - I)
Faculty Seminar 13-10-2016 Sri. J Vikranth, Associate Professor, ANITS
60 1,2 1
14 Gantry girders (Steel Structures – II) Faculty Seminar 17-12-2016 Sri. M.K.S.S.K.Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS
58 1,2 1
15 Wind load calculations for gable frames (Steel Structures – II)
Faculty Seminar 05-01-2017 Sri. M.K.S.S.K.Chaitanya, Assistant Professor, ANITS
58 1,2 1
16
Bar bending schedule for Reinforcement in Cages of Pile Foundations (Geotechnical Engineering – II)
Faculty Seminar 30-01-2017 Sri. Ch.Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
79 1,2 1
17 Fundamentals of Radiometry (Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems)
Faculty Seminar 11-02-2017 Sri. Ch. Vineel, Assistant Professor, ANITS
35 1,2,5 1,2
18 Breakwater Curves (Transportation Engineering – II)
Faculty Seminar 23-02-2017 Sri. T. Kiran Kumar, Assistant Professor, ANITS
85 1,2 1
19 Design of masonry retaining wall (Reinforced Concrete Structures – II)
Faculty Seminar 07-03-2017 Sri. J Vikranth, Associate Professor, ANITS
86 1,2 1
20 Soil Nailing, Soil Distribution in India (Ground Improvement Techniques)
Faculty Seminar 09-03-2017 Ms. P. Vandana Rao, Assistant Professor, ANITS
80 1,2 1
29
2.2. Teaching-Learning Processes (100)
2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25) (Processes may include adherence to academic calendar and improving instruction methods using pedagogical initiatives such as real world examples, collaborative learning, quality of laboratory experience with regard to conducting experiments, recording observations, analysis of data etc. encouraging bright students, assisting weak students etc. The implementation details and impact analysis need to be documented)
Improvement of quality of Teaching and Learning at ANITS is effected in the following three stages:
I) Stage I: Teaching –Learning Foundation
II) Satge II: Improving Instruction Methods
III) Stage III: Innovative practices adopted by faculty members
The first two stages are explained in this section, while the third section is considered in Sec.5.5 as per the
SAR format.
Stage I: Teaching –Learning Foundation
The scheme of activities/elements adopted at ANITS in stage I: the Teaching Learning Foundation is
illustrated in Fig. B 2.2.1a. It consists of the following activities/elements
1) Budget support
2) Faculty Recruitment
3) Providing Infrastructure
4) Procurement of Quality Equipment / Consumables
5) Academic calendar
6) Subjects allotment
7) Quality lecture notes
8) FDP/Seminar in Teaching Methodology
9) Lesson Plan
10) Instruction Delivery
11) Lecture dairy
12) Continuous Evaluation
13) Review of Syllabus Coverage
14) End Semester Exams
15) Results Analysis
16) Assessment of CO-PO Attainment
17) Action for unattained COs/POs/PSOs
18) Faculty Annual Appraisal
These elements are briefly explained below
1) Budget Support
The resources needed for Teaching-Learning process are met by suitable Budget. Quality
equipment/consumables are procured by the Department through the Department Purchase committee.
Similarly the infrastructure requirements of the Department are also proposed by the Department and
provided by the Principal/Management.
2) Faculty Recruitment
Effective Teaching-Learning process requires qualified and competent faculty members. Advertisement for
Faculty/staff recruitment is published in News Papers in March every year. Eligible and shortlisted
candidates will be called for interview in April. The interview panel consists of University Professor,
30
Member of the Governing body and senior faculty member of the Department apart from the HoD,
Director of Administration, Principal and Secretary/Chairman. Selections are made purely based on merit.
Fig. B 2.2.1a Flow chart showing the Foundational Teaching-Learning at ANITS
31
3) Academic Calendar
The Institute Academic Calendar is circulated to the Departments towards the end of the previous
academic year. The academic calendar is implemented as per schedule with respect to commencement of
class work, Mid-I and Mid-II examinations, Last working day, End semester exams (theory) and End
semester exams (Practical) in each semester/year. In addition, FDPs, students counselling, remedial
classes, guest lectures, workshop/symposia, industrial visits, CRC meetings etc., are also implemented by
the faculty members under the review and guidance of the HoD.
4) Subjects Allotment
The list of electives is circulated to the students towards the end of the previous semester and the
electives for the semester are finalized based on the students option. After finalising the electives, Faculty
members are given choice to give options 1, 2, 3... etc., for subjects allotment. Mostly faculty will be
allotted one subject of their 1st choice. The second subject is also given as per the choice of the faculty,
subject to the needs of the Department.
5) Quality Lecture notes
Faculty members prepare/update lecture notes for allotted subjects by
Consulting various prescribed text books, Question banks of previous examinations, relevant
NPTEL courses and other e-resources from Google.
Participating in various workshops organized within and outside the ANITS campus to enhance the
practical knowledge.
Pursuing Ph.D.
6) FDP/Seminar in Teaching Methodology
Faculty Development program in Teaching methodology is organized in June every year in ANITS for faculty
members having <2 years’ experience. HoD also conducts a seminar on guidelines for effective teaching to
all faculty members at the Department level. This also includes mock classes by the faculty members
7) Lesson Plan
Lesson plans are prepared by faculty members, based on the Academic calendar, syllabus and weekly load,
which is reviewed and approved by HoD.
8) Instruction Delivery
Faculty members take classes as per time table and lesson plan, duly compensating for lost classes due to
leaves, unexpected holidays, and following various teaching-learning techniques, methods etc.
9) Lecture Dairy
The topics covered in each class are recorded in lesson dairy in the subject attendance register. The
attendance registers are reviewed by HoD on a regular basis to monitor the syllabus coverage.
10) Continuous Evaluation
This consists of Mid exams, Assignments, class tests etc., for theory courses and weekly viva voce,
Observation and Record evaluation and internal lab exam for Laboratory courses.
11) Review of Syllabus Coverage
HoD reviews the coverage of syllabus on a regular basis in faculty meetings. Class Review Committee
meetings with regular students of the class along with class faculty is organized before each Mid
Examination.
12) End Semester Exams
These are conducted as per the Academic calendar. End semester practical exams are conducted with one
internal examiner and one external examiner.
32
13) Results Analysis
Analysis of Results is done by faculty coordinator for drafting action for low pass percentage in any course.
14) Assessment of CO-PO Attainment
The procedure for assessment of CO-PO attainment has been evolved over a period of time in the
Department. CO attainment is done by the concerned subject faculty and PO attainment is done the
concerned coordinator(s). Action plan for unattained POs/PSOs is drafted.
15) Faculty Annual Appraisal
Faculty members submit appraisal of their performance annually, in a prescribed format, which is further
reviewed by HoD and Principal for award of Annual increment.
Stage II: Improving Instruction Methods
The scheme of activities in place at ANITS for improving instruction methods are illustrated in Fig. B 2.2.1b
A) Pedagogical Initiatives
The faculty members/Department adopts various methods, techniques and teaching aids for improving
instruction methods, as described below.
1) Use of Teaching-Learning techniques
Revising the topics covered in the previous class through simple questions and answers at the
beginning of each class
Repeating important points in each class
Conducting Tutorial sessions for problematic subjects. Revision of syllabus before examinations
2) Use of e-resources and ICT
Using attractive electronic presentations (PPT) on difficult topics for better understanding. Use of e-learning - resources from National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning
(NPTEL).
Presenting videos which show the recent technologies in civil engineering.
Example
PPT is incorporated as an item in Course Plan in all subjects wherever relevant
3) Focus on individual students
Identifying uniqueness of each student, understanding the variations among students rather than
lamenting them
Equal attention on the student, his strengths and limitations, along with the subject matter
Effective counselling based on the student’s individual social and financial background.
Motivating students to set multiple career goals to sustain their interest in the learning process.
4) Real world Examples
Exposing students to real world through Examples
Presenting the real life engineering problems through case studies.
Demonstration using Models and charts for better subject understanding.
Providing exposure to real world of Engineering by taking students to on-going construction projects within and outside the campus.
33
Fig. B 2.2.1b Flow chart illustrating the Activities in place at ANITS for improving instruction methods
34
5) Mentoring slow learners
Remedial classes are conducted for late-joining lateral entry students with a separate time table to cover
the syllabus up to their joining time. Remedial classes are also conducted for lateral entry students in
Mathematics, as they are found to be weak in Mathematics.
Class tests are conducted after a unit syllabus is completed and the slow learners are identified. Remedial
classes are conducted for these slow learners before the Mid exams.
6) Encouraging Advanced learners
assigning complex design problems individually to enhance the problem skills of students
Giving assignments to the students on topics beyond curriculum.
7) Guest Lectures
Guest lectures are organized by industry experts which provide industry exposure to the students beyond
the class room learning and curriculum. The details are provided in Sec.2.1.1 and 2.1.2 of the SAR
8) Students Participation in Workshops/symposia
Students are encouraged to participate in workshops and technical symposia organized by various
engineering colleges including IITs. This adds to the knowledge and enhances their knowledge, attitude
and communication skills.
B) Students feedback
Feedback is taken from students on the effectiveness of teaching and subject learning at different points of
time during the semester. Initially, feedback is taken from representative students from each class
informally by HoD after 1-2 weeks of commencement of class work. Feedback is also taken during students
counselling by all faculty members during the same period and communicated to the HoD. If students are
facing difficulty in any subject, the concerned faculty member is informed of the same. Necessary guidance
and support is given by HoD and another senior subject faculty member. This consists of asking the faculty
member to give a mock class before HoD and another senior subject faculty, giving guidelines for
improvement, reviewing the lecture notes and offering necessary support in the subject. After 2-3 weeks,
feedback is again taken from students in the subject for necessary action. In extreme cases, where the
faculty member is unable to improve up to the minimum desired standard, the faculty member is removed
from service with sufficient notice.
Besides the above, on-line students Feedback is taken anonymously twice every semester. The feedback is
summarized and communicated to all faculty members with necessary remarks by the Principal. This
feedback is considered part of Annual Performance Appraisal of the faculty member with a weightage of
25% in Teaching-Learning and Evaluation category.
C) On-line Attendance and Counselling irregular students
The students’ attendance is updated in the Attendance register on a daily basis and is also entered on-line
in Ez-school which for any day will freeze after 48 hours and requires permission from HoD and Principal
for entry after that time.
The students are generally counselled to maintain a minimum attendance of 85%. In the first month of
each semester, the students with attendance<85% are identified and their parents are informed. These
irregular students are counselled and an undertaking is taken from them duly signed by their parents. In
case of students with attendance<65%, the concerned parents are called to the college to meet the
Principal/HoD and sign the undertaking. The class teacher consolidates the action taken and submits a
report to the HoD. The process is continued in case of students who continue to be irregular. This practice
is found to significantly reduce the irregularity of the students.
35
D) Quality of laboratory experience
The quality of laboratory experience to students is improved through the following measures.
1) Experimental setup: student ratio 1:2 is maintained which provides good quality of laboratory
experience.
2) Manuals are provided for all experiments in the laboratories.
3) Viva-voce is conducted before commencement of each lab class
4) Faculty member monitors to see that every student is involved in recording of
readings/observations
5) Calculations and analysis of data as well as practical significance /application of the results
obtained is done by students individually
6) Use of Rubrics for assessment of students in each lab class has been initiated.
2.2.2 Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20) (Mention the initiatives, implementation details and analysis of learning levels related to quality of semester question papers, assignments and evaluation) 1) Mid exam question paper Setting Question paper for internal semester examination (Mid exam) is set in the standard format by the subject faculty for approximately 50% of the total syllabus. Under Andhra University regulations, the pattern of Mid exam question paper consists of 7 questions out of which the student has to answer any Four Questions. Under Autonomous regulations with effect from the batch admitted in 2015-16, the question paper consists of three units with two questions in each unit. The student has to answer all units with internal choice within the unit. Thus the student has to study complete syllabus for Mid examinations. Each question of the Mid Exam Question papers and Assignments is mapped to the corresponding CO for assessment of COs. The Sample Question paper under AU Regulations are enclosed as Annexure-2. The Sample Question paper under Autonomous Regulations is enclosed as Annexure -3.
2) Question paper validation A three member examination team reviews the Mid exam question paper for validation with respect to COs and Bloom’s taxonomy of learning objectives and the report is subm itted to HoD for further action.
3) Scheme of Valuation for Mid exams The faculty member prepares scheme of valuation for the Mid exam question paper and evaluates the answer scripts as per the scheme. The scheme of valuation and the valued answer scripts are shared with the students for scrutiny. Students affix their signature on the answe r script after scrutiny.
4) Assignments Minimum two Assignments are given in each subject for every semester. The questions framed in the assignments are taken from multiple sources (previous question papers, text books, etc). The assignments are evaluated within two weeks after submission and the valued assignments are returned to the students for their scrutiny and improvement. Mapping is done for all questions of the assignment with the CO’s of the course.
5) Class Test/Seminar/Quiz A class test, seminar or quiz are also part of the internal assessment, one for each semester for improvement of student academics. 2.2.3 Quality of student projects (25) (Quality of the project is measured in terms of consideration to factors including, but not limited to,
environment, safety, ethics, cost, type (application, product, research, review etc.) and standards. Processes
related to project identification, allotment, continuous monitoring, evaluation including demonstration of
working prototypes and enhancing the relevance of projects. Mention Implementation details including
details of POs and PSOs addressed through the projects with justification)
36
The quality of student Project work is enhanced at ANITS by the following process . Under Andhra University regulations, Project work is in IV Year II semester (up to 2017-18) and the Projects allotment is done towards the end of IV year I semester. Under Autonomous regulations, Project work is in IV Year I semester (w.e.f. 2018-19) and the allotment is done in III Year II semester.
1) Course Outcomes for Student Projects
The quality of student projects is ensured and assured through the achievement of the well articulated
Course outcomes, as given in Table B 2.2.3.1. All student project works consider the factors such as
environment, safety, ethics, cost and standards. This is ensured through proper instruction by the Project
guides as well as through Project reviews, where focus is on attainment of COs.
Table B 2.2.3.1
CO
No.
Course Outcomes for student Projects Relevance to POs/PSOs
POs PSOs
1 Student will be able to analyze & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering.
1, 2, 3 1
2 Student will be able to use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
4, 5, 10 2
3 Student will be able to develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
6, 7 3
4 Student will be able to function ethically and effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in multidisciplinary teams and applying management principles and prepare for independent and lifelong learning.
8, 9, 11, 12 -
2) Type of Project (Application, Product, Research, Review)
The students Projects have been classified into the types I) Application, II) Product, III) Research and IV)
Review, as shown in Table B 2.2.3.1
Table B 2.2.3.2
Student Project No
Type of student projects I) Application, II) Product, III) Research and IV) Review
CAY 2018-19 CAYm1 2017-18 CAYm2 2016-17 I I II I II I II I II II III IV
1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1
2 3 - 2 1 - 3 - 3 - - 2 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 - - 1
4 2 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 - - 1 5 3 1 3 2 - 3 - 3 - - 2 1
6 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 1 7 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 2 1
8 2 - 3 1 - 2 - 2 - 1 3 1
9 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 10 3 - 3 2 - 3 - 3 - - 1 1
11 3 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 1 12 1 - 3 1 1 2 1 2 1
13 3 1 3 2 - 3 - 3 - 14 3 - 2 1 1 2 1 2 1
Correlation levels indicated by numbers: 1: Low; 2: medium; 3: High
37
3) Division of students into Project work batches The students are divided into Project work batches by first ranking the students based on their performance in examinations (CGPA/average SGPA/number of backlogs) up to III year II semester/ III Year I Semester. For 12 batches, for example, the top 12 students are nominated as student coordinators for the respective batches. The 13 th ranker is allotted to the 12th batch, 14th ranker to the 11th batch and so on with the 24 th ranker to the 1st batch. The 25th ranker is then allotted to the 1st batch and the cycle is repeated.
4) Project Identification and Allotment The project batches are notified to the students along with the topics offered by the faculty members (anonymously, without guide names). The students are asked to identify topics of their choice and give their options in terms of their order of preference 1, 2, 3 etc.
The project student coordinators are then called for a meeting with HoD and Project faculty Coordinator and another senior faculty member. One student is asked to pick up the batch number (say 6) from a draw of lots with batch numbers. The project coordinator of batch 6, will be awarded the 1st option of the choice of his/her batch. He/she picks up another batch number (say 3) and the 3 rd batch is allotted the topic of 1st option of his/her respective batch. If the 1 st option topic is already allotted, he/she will be allotted the 2nd preferred option and thus the process is completed. The allotted project topics and the corresponding guides are then notified.
After allotment of projects is completed, the respective guide gives option to the s tudents to choose an alternate topic if any.
5) Continuous monitoring and Project reviews The progress of the project work is continuously monitored. Three Project Reviews are conducted to review the quality and progress of the project work. The panel of e xaminers for Project review consists of Project guide, a subject faculty as examiner and HoD. Sample circular for Project review is enclosed in the Annexure-4.
The project review consists of assessment of PPT presentations by the individual students about the work done along with plan of action for the remaining work. Factors including, environment, safety, ethics, cost and applicable standards as well as team work and CO-PO/PSO mapping are duly considered in the assessment. Sample format for Project review assessment is enclosed in the Annexure-5. Suggestions given by the panel or other faculty members are to be incorporated by the students which will be reviewed during the subsequent assessment. The schedule of project reviews and the pro-forma for evaluation are enclosed. The evaluation format and the power point presentation made by students during the review assess both individual and team performance.
End Semester evaluation of Project work is done by a panel consisting of External examiner from Andhra University and HoD along with the Project guide. Suggestions given by the external examiner are incorporated before submission of the final dissertation. The project classification type (application, product, research, or review) for last three years is shown in Table B 2.2.3.1. Rubrics for Project work assessment has been incorporated from this academic year.
6) Project work Publications The details of the papers published from the students Project work are given below.
Papers published from students Project work
CAY (2018-19) 1. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D. and Sai Revathi, A. (2019) “Use of Parawada Fly Ash as a Substitute to Soil
in Embankments and Subgrades”, International Journal of Management Technology and Engineering, ISSN No.: 2249-7455, Volume IX, Issue IV, pp.2130-2136, April 2019, Impact Factor 6.3 (1.Thomson Reuters' Indexed Journal (Research ID : H -2418-2017); 2.Scopus Suggested Journal (ID: 50E4CF07B9164F83); 3. UGC Approved Journal (Serial No. 45550))
2. P Vandana Rao, G Sudheer kumar, (2019),”Analysis of response of square footing on sloping terrain using PLAXIS 2D”, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative
38
Research (JETIR), ISSN-2349-5162, Vol. 6, Issue 6, pp.710-717, Impact factor 5.87. 3. M. Premchand, B. Appala Naidu, (2019), “2D Flow simulation for the upstream side of nagarjuna
sagar reservoir using hec-ras”, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), ISSN-2349-5162, Vol. 6, Issue 5, pp.396-399, Impact factor 5.87.
4. Chippada Srinivas, T.Satyavathi, P. Gnana Prakash, (2019),” A study on investigation of micro silica as partial replacement of cement in concrete”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISSN 0973-4562, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 2203-2206, Impact factor 2.38.
5. Chippada Srinivas, P. Gnana Prakash, (2019),” Experimental study on compressive strength of concrete by partially replacing cement with micro silica”, International Journal of Management, Technology And Engineering, ISSN NO: 2249-7455, Vol. IX, Issue III, pp. 5313-5319, Impact factor 6.30.
Papers published from students Project work CAYm1 (2017-18)
6. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D. and Somasekhar, A.S. (2018) Geotechnical Properties of Parawada Fly Ash and Thagarapuvalasa soil Mixtures for Use in Highway Embankments, International journal of basic and applied research, Vol. 8, No.6, June 2018, pp.101 -115, www.pragatipublication.com, ISSN 2249-3352 (P) 2278-0505 (E), Cosmos Impact Factor (Germany): 5.86.
7. J.Harsha vardhan reddy, L. Venkata anil, and D.Vinay kumar (2018) "A review on integrated solid waste management in visakhapatnam city", International Journal of advance in management, technology and engineering sciences (IJAMTES),volume 8, issue V, May 2018.
8. M.Premchand, S. Bhavani (2018) Roof top rain water harvesting technique for ANITS campus, International journal of emerging technologies and innovative research ISSN:2349-5162 vol. 5, Issue 5, page number 396-399, May 2018
9. Ch. Vineel, M.Vineeta, S.Sarvani (2018) Strength comparison between normally cured and accelerated cured concrete with partial replacement of sand with pond ash, Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, JETIR-Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 143-147, Impact factor-5.87, 2018.
10.P. Vandana Rao, B.Prasanthi (2018) A parametric study on black cotton soil stabilized using rice husk ash, International Journal of Advances in Management, Technology and Engineering Sciences (IJAMTES), Volume 8, Issue 4, April 2018
11.Ch.Srinivas, V. Naveen Kumar (2018) Experimental Study on mechanical properties of concrete by partially replacing cement with GGBS and fine aggregate with copper slag, International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences, April 2018, ISSN 2249-7455, Impact factor 6.3
12.Ch.Srinivas, N. Naveen Kumar, E. Vinod (2018) Experimental study of Copper slag on mechanical properties of concrete, International journal of Applied Engineering Research, April 2018, ISSN 5328-5331
Papers published from students Project work CAYm2 (2016-17)
1. Narasinga Rao, B.N.D., and Anantha Sairam, K. (2017), Use of Parawada Fly Ash in Concrete as Partial Replacement of Cement, International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research IJETSR www.ijetsr.com, ISSN 2394 – 3386 Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2017, pp.405-410, Impact Factor 2.12.
2. Ch.Vineel, G.Hemalatha devi (2017). Evaluation of crusher dust as replacement of filler in concrete", IOSR Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 7, Issue 9, pages 18-21, September 2017, Impact factor-1.68.
39
2.2.4 Initiatives related to industry interaction (15) (Give details of the industry involvement in the program such as industry-attached laboratories, partial
delivery of appropriate courses by industry experts etc. Mention the initiatives, implementation details and
impact analysis)
1) Industry involvement in the program design and Curriculum.
The Board of Studies (Civil) consists of a senior engineer from the Industry and Professors from II T, Madras,
IIT, Bombay and Andhra University. BoS external members lists is enclosed as Annexure-6. In addition,
senior engineers from the industry are also consulted in the design of syllabus.
2) Industry involvement in partial delivery of any regular courses for students
Students have done their Project work in collaboration with some industries, as shown in Table B 2.2.4.2
Table B 2.2.4.2
Project work in collaboration with industries CAY (2018-19)
S. No.
Project title Roll Nos of students
Industry involved
1 A Study on use of Fly ash in Embankments and Sub grades
315126508061,24,34,37,40
HNPC, Visakhapatnam. DSTPP, Nellore. SGPL, Nellore.
2 Laboratory study on chemical composition of fly ash
315126508014,25,38,45,72,
HNPC, Visakhapatnam. DSTPP, Nellore. SGPL, Nellore.
3 Cost economics of reinforced and unreinforced flexible payments over soft soils.
315126508017,21,22,43,52
Megaplast, Mumbai
Table B 2.2.4.2
Project work in collaboration with industries CAYm1 (2017-18)
S. No.
Project title Roll Nos of students Industry involved
1 A Study on High Volume Fly ash Concrete
314126508034,18,17,55, 313126508070
NTPC, Parawada, Dr.NTRTPS, Vijayawada, SGPL, Nellore,
TPCL, Nellore 2 Assessment of Pond Ash for
Sustainable Utilization in Construction Industry
314126508053,38,40,57, 313126508028
NTPC, Parawada
3 A Study on the Use of Fly ash in Geotechnical Engineering Applications
314126508002,22,27,39,62 313126508059,
NTPC, Parawada
Table B 2.2.4.2
Project work in collaboration with industries CAYm2 (2016-17)
S. No.
Project title Roll Nos of students Industry involved
1 Fly ash utilization in concrete and soil stabilization
313126508032,12,15,33,20 NTPC, Parawada
2 Planning of smart cities 313126508009,60,39,24,63 GVMC
40
3) Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions taken thereof
Industry institute interaction is effected through
1) Guest lectures by industry experts
2) Membership of industry experts in Department BoS
3) Membership of industry experts in Department Advisory committee
4) Industrial visits by students
5) Student Project works with involvement of industry
4) Industrial internship /summer training of more than two weeks and post training Assessment
Students undergo Industrial training for 4 weeks under the guidance of an engineers from industry and one
faculty member from ANITS, at the end of III year II semester during summer vacation. After the successful
completion of Industrial Training, the students will submit a report which will be evaluated through viva
voce by a Panel of examiners consisting of HOD, Internal guide and a senior faculty member. Circular
showing the schedule of industrial training evaluation and the evaluation format are enclosed in annexure-
7.
5) Impact analysis of industrial training
Practical knowledge of the student in Civil Engineering is improved. This is ascertained based on review of
the industrial training report submitted by the students and also through viva voce examination. The
POs/PSOs attained through industrial training are provided in Table B 2.2.4.5.
41
POs/PSOs attainment from Industrial Training
Table B 2.2.4.5
CO Course Outcome PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
419.1
Investigate and analyze at least one complex civil engineering problem with substantiated conclusions using first
principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
2 2
419.2
Select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools to complex civil engineering
activities with an understanding of the limitations.
2 2 2
419.3
Assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to one civil engineering problem.
2
419.4
Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in teams as well as to comprehend and write effective
reports and design documentation, make effec tive presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
2 2 2
419.5
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and
management principles and apply these to manage at least one civil engineering project, as a member and leader in a team.
2 3
PO/PSO attainment CAY (2018-19) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
PO/PSO attainment CAYm1 (2017-18) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
PO/PSO attainment CAYm2 (2016-17) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
42
2.2.5 Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training (15) (Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact analysis)
Potential industries for summer training are contacted and students are deputed to various industries for summer training. The details are
provided in Table B 2.2.5.
Table B 2.2.5 Industries where students underwent Industrial Training
CAY 2018-19
S. No.
Company Name Company
Sector Incorporation
Status Discipline Level
Date From
Date To
No. of students
1 Visakhapatnam Port trust Public Central Civil UG 10-05-2019 02-06-2019 4
2 VMRDA Public State Civil UG 01-05-2019 31-05-2019 5
3 Rashtriy Ispat Nigam Limited,Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
Public State Civil UG 29-04-2019 18-05-2019 5
4 Public Health & Engineering Department, Visakhapatnam.
Public State Civil UG 23-04-2019 23-04-2019 4
5 Pancahyathi Raj, Srikakulam Public State Civil UG 27-05-2019 18-06-2019 5
6 G.V.M.C Public State Civil UG 01-05-2019 28-05-2019 4
7 IVRCL,Rajahmundry Public State Civil UG 02-05-2019 04-06-2019 5
8 MK BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS Private State Civil UG 06-05-2019 05-06-2019 5
9 Sri Ram Properties,Panorama Hills Private State Civil UG 30-04-2019 28-05-2019 5
10 Rayi Design + Engineer Consultants Private State Civil UG 29-04-2019 29-05-2019 4
11 Sri Sai Builders Private State Civil UG 01-05-2019 29-05-2019 5
12 Cheri Associates Private State Civil UG 25-04-2019 25-05-2019 5
13 Balaji constructions Private State Civil UG 24-04-2019 25-05-2019 5
14 Surya Allied Services Private State Civil UG 22-04-2019 21-05-2019 5
43
Table B 2.2.5 Industries where students underwent Industrial Training
CAYm1 2017-18
S. No.
Company Name Company
Sector Incorporation
Status Discipline Level
Date From
Date To
No. of students
1 Roads & Buildings Section, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 01-05-2018 28-05-2018 16
2 Visakhapatnam Port trust, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 05-05-2018 25-05-2018 12
3 VUDA, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 30-04-2018 26-05-2018 5
4 G.V.M.C., Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 05-05-2018 31-05-2018 5
5 Irrigation department Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam
Public State Civil UG 01-05-2018 31-05-2018 5
6 Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 30-04-2018 19-05-2018 5
7 Pancahyath Raj, Bheemili, Visakhapatnam Public State Civil UG 01-05-2018 31-05-2018 5
8 Sai Siva Ganga Architects, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 05-05-2018 31-05-2018 12
9 Visakhi Developers, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2018 30-05-2018 5
Table B 2.2.5 Industries where students underwent Industrial Training
CAYm2 2016-17
S. No.
Company Name Company
Sector Incorporation
Status Discipline Level
Date From
Date To
No. of students
1 RashtriyIspat Nigam Limited,Visakhapatnam Steel Plant Public Central Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 18 2 East Coast Railway, Visakhapatnam Public Central Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5
3 Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5
4 India Bulls Sierra (P) Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 08-05-2017 20-05-2017 10 5 Venkateswara Asset Management, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2017 30-05-2017 5
6 Vijay Prestressed Products, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 04-05-2017 24-05-2017 5 7 Hema Abodes Pvt. Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 11-05-2017 01-06-2017 6
8 Jana Chaitanya Housing (P) Ltd., Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 11-05-2017 01-06-2017 12 9 MVV Builders, Visakhapatnam Private State Civil UG 03-05-2017 30-05-2017 5
44
CRITERION 3 Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120
3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES (120) 3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20) 3.1.1. Course Outcomes (COs) (SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study, however, should be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if asked) (05) Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6.
The Course Outcomes of all courses of all semesters for CAY 2018-19, CAYm1 2017-18, and CAYm2 2016-17 have been prepared. The Course Outcomes of one course from each semester of study for
CAY (2018-19) are given in Table B 3.1.1.
Table B 3.1.1 Course Outcomes of one course from each semester CAY 2018-19
CO No. Course Outcome
CIV111 English
CIV111.1 Analyze the structure of the phrases, clauses and sentences
CIV111.2 Apply his enriched vocabulary to give better shape to his communication skills.
CIV111.3 Effectively use different formats of business correspondence.
CIV111.4 Use idiomatic expressions and foreign phrases in his communication.
CIV111.5 Use correct structures to write sentences.
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II
CIV121.1 Solve linear system equations using of matrix algebra techniques
CIV121.2 Determine the Eigen values and vectors of a matrix
CIV121.3 Apply different techniques in solving differential equations that model engineering problem
CIV121.4 Use the application of Differential equations like simple electric circuits, Newton’s law of cooling and to solve any higher order linear ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients
CIV121.5 Solve linear differential equations and Network analysis using Laplace transforms
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III
CIV211.1 Understand the concepts of Gradient, Divergence and Curl and finding scalar potential function of irrotational vector fields.
CIV211.2 Understand the concepts of Green’s Theorem, Stokes’ Theorem and the Divergence Theorem and to evaluate line integrals, surface, integrals and flux integrals.
CIV211.3 Understand some basic techniques for solving linear partial differential equations and how to identify a partial differential equation in order to determine which technique(s) can best be applied to solve it.
CIV211.4 Understand the methods to solve the Laplace, heat, and wave equations.
CIV211.5 Gain good knowledge in the application of Fourier Transforms.
CIV221 Concrete Technology
45
CO No. Course Outcome
CIV221.1 Understand the composition, manufacturing process and properties of cement.
CIV221.2 Understand the classification, characteristics and properties of aggregate.
CIV221.3 Acquire the skill of testing, supervision of concrete work & interpretation of tests results.
CIV221.4 Understand the behaviour of hardened concrete.
CIV221.5 Understand the need for special concretes.
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II
CIV312.1 Plan and design the sewerage systems
CIV312.2 Select the appropriate appurtenances in the sewerage systems
CIV312.3 Selection of suitable treatment flow for sewage treatment
CIV312.4 Identify the critical point of pollution in a river for a specific amount of pollutant disposal into the river
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II
CIV321.1 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of staircase.
CIV321.2 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of cantilever & counterfort retaining walls.
CIV321.3 Design and draw the reinforcement detailing of pile and pile caps
CIV321.4 Understand the basic concepts of pre-stressed concrete, know the different prestressing systems, analyze the prestressed concrete members and evaluate the losses in prestressing.
CIV321.5 Understand the structural drawings for practical execution.
CIV413 Project Planning & Management
CIV413.1 Prepare the schedule of actives in a construction project
CIV413.2 Estimate project completion time using different techniques namely CPM and PERT
CIV413.3 Prepare tender quotation for a construction project
CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance
CIV423.1 Understand the economic environment and to give an idea on various concepts of Engineering economics.
CIV423.2 Gain knowledge about the concepts of cost estimating and financial management.
46
3.1.2. CO-PO/PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per semester from 3rd to 8th semester) (05)
Table B 3.1.2 CO-PO/PSO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1
CAY 2018-19
CO PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English
CIV111.1
2
3
3
2 3
CIV111.2
3
3
CIV111.3
3
3
CIV111.4
3
3
CIV111.5
3
3 2 2
3
CIV111 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II
CIV121.1 3 2
1
3 1
CIV121.2 3 2
1
3 1
CIV121.3 3 2
1
3 1
CIV121.4 3 2
1
3 1
CIV121.5 3 2
1
3 1
CIV121 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III
CIV211.1 3 3 3 3
2 1 3 3
CIV211.2 3 2 2 2
3 2
CIV211.3
2 2 3
3 1 2 3
CIV211.4
3 2
3
3
CIV211.5
3 2
3
3
CIV211 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67
CIV221 Concrete Technology
CIV221.1 2 3 2 3 3
2
1 3 3 2
CIV221.2 2 2 2 2 3
2 3
CIV221.3
2 2 3 2
3
1 2 3 3
CIV221.4
3 2
2
3
3 2 3
CIV221.5
2 2 3 2
3
1 2 3 3
CIV221 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II
47
CO PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV312.1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
1 3 3 3
CIV312.2 3 2 2 2 3
3 3 3
CIV312.3
2 2 3 2 3 3
1 2 3 3
CIV312.4
3 2
2 3 3 2
3 2 3
CIV312 3.00 2.50 2.25 2.67 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.75 2.75 3.00
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II
CIV321.1 2 3 1
2
2 2
2
CIV321.2 2 3 1
2
2 2
2
CIV321.3 2 3 1
2
2 2
2
CIV321.4 2 3 1
2
2 2
1
CIV321.5 2 3 1
1
2 2
3
CIV321 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV413 Project Planning & Management
CIV413.1 3 3 2 2 1
2 2 3 2 2 1
CIV413.2 3 3 2 2 3
2 2 3 3 1 3 1
CIV413.3 3 3 2 2 1 2
2 2 2 3 2 1 2 2
CIV413 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.75 2.25 1.50 1.75 1.67
CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance
CIV423.1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
CIV423.2 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2
CIV423 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00
Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below: 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation
48
3.1.3 Program level Course-PO/PSO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)
TABLE 3.1.3 Course – PO/PSO Correlation Matrix
CAY 2018-19
Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below:
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV113 Engineering Physics 3.00 2.67 2.33 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.75 1.00
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 2.20 1.40 3.00 2.20 3.00 2.40 3.00
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 2.50 1.50 2.67 2.33 2.75 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.33 3.00
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00
CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 2.83 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.83 2.83 1.67 1.83
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.25 1.50 1.60 1.60 2.40 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.80
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.60 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.20 1.60 1.25 1.50
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.33
49
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67
CIV212 Building Technology 3.00 2.33 2.17 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.75 1.00 2.67 3.00
CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 2.00
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 3.00 2.80 1.75 1.60 1.00 2.80 1.60
CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.40
CIV216 Strength of Materials 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.40 1.40 3.00 2.40
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 2.40 1.50 1.67 2.00 1.60 1.80 1.33 2.60 2.00
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
CIV221 Concrete Technology 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 1.83 2.17 1.50 1.75 1.83 2.17 1.75
CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.33 3.00 2.33
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.00 2.67 1.67 2.50 3.00 2.83 2.67 2.67 3.00 2.33 2.17 2.83
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 1.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.50
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 2.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.33 2.00
50
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II 3.00 2.50 2.25 2.67 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.75 2.75 3.00
CIV313 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 1.80
CIV314 Structural Analysis – II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00
CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.33 2.00 2.50 1.25 1.33 1.00 2.00 1.25
CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.50
CIV317 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50
CIV318 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 3.00
CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude -I 1.88 1.83 1.63 2.25 2.13 2.25
CIV3111 Technical Seminar 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.20
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV322 Estimation & Costing 1.67 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.00 1.33 2.00 2.00
CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 2.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.33 2.67 2.00 2.00
CIV324 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.00 1.50 1.33 2.20 3.00 2.00 1.75
CIV325 Water Resources Engineering – I 2.40 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.40 1.33 1.00 2.60 1.75 1.80
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50
CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-I
2.33 2.33 2.33 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.33
CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude –II 2.33 1.33 2.63 2.63 2.00 2.63
51
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.80
CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano Technology) 3.00 1.80 1.67 1.67 1.75 2.00 1.50 1.20
2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00
CIV412 Professional Elective - II (Air Pollution & control)
2.75 3.00 2.25 1.50 2.25 2.00 3.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 2.00
CIV413 Project Planning & Management 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.75 2.25 1.50 1.75 1.67
CIV414 Steel Structures 2.75 3.00 2.33 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.00 2.00 1.50 2.25 2.00 2.75 2.00 1.00
CIV415 Water Resources Engineering - II 2.40 2.00 1.75 2.50 1.00 1.40 1.50 2.75 1.33 1.33 1.20 2.40 1.75 1.60
CIV416 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 1.80 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.40 3.00 2.00 3
CIV417 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II
1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00
CIV418 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.67
CIV419 Project work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV4110 Industrial Training 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV 421 Professional Elective – III (Ground Improvement Techniques)
3.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.80 2.20 2.20 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.80 3.00
CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.50 2.00
CIV424 Irrigation Structures Design & Drawing 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00
CIV426 Project Work - II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
52
TABLE 3.1.3 Course – PO/PSO Correlation Matrix
CAYm1 2017-18
Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below: 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV113 Engineering Physics 3.00 2.67 2.33 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.75 1.00
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 2.20 1.40 3.00 2.20 3.00 2.40 3.00
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 2.50 1.50 2.67 2.33 2.75 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.33 3.00
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00
CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 2.83 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.83 2.83 1.67 1.83
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.25 1.50 1.60 1.60 2.40 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.80
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.60 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.20 1.60 1.25 1.50
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.33
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00
53
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67
CIV212 Building Technology 3.00 2.33 2.17 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.75 1.00 2.67 3.00
CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 2.00
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 3.00 2.80 1.75 1.60 1.00 2.80 1.60
CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.40
CIV216 Strength of Materials 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.40 1.40 3.00 2.40
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 2.40 1.50 1.67 2.00 1.60 1.80 1.33 2.60 2.00
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
CIV221 Concrete Technology 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 1.83 2.17 1.50 1.75 1.83 2.17 1.75
CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.33 3.00 2.33
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.00 2.67 1.67 2.50 3.00 2.83 2.67 2.67 3.00 2.33 2.17 2.83
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 1.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.50
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 2.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.33 2.00
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II 3.00 2.50 2.25 2.67 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 1.00 2.75 2.75 3.00
54
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV313 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 1.80
CIV314 Structural Analysis – II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00
CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.33 2.00 2.50 1.25 1.33 1.00 2.00 1.25
CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.50
CIV317 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50
CIV318 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.50 3.00
CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude -I 1.88 1.83 1.63 2.25 2.13 2.25
CIV3111 Technical Seminar 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.20
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.80 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV322 Estimation & Costing 1.67 1.33 1.67 2.00 2.00 1.33 2.00 2.00
CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 2.67 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.33 2.67 2.00 2.00
CIV324 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 2.80 2.80 2.00 1.50 1.33 2.20 3.00 2.00 1.75
CIV325 Water Resources Engineering – I 2.40 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.40 1.33 1.00 2.60 1.75 1.80
CIV 326(D) RS & GIS applications in Civil Engineering
2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.33 1.67 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.33 2.00
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50
CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-I
2.33 2.33 2.33 2.00 2.33 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.33 2.33
55
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude –II 2.33 1.33 2.63 2.63 2.00 2.63
CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.80
CIV411 Water Resources Engineering-I 2.33 2.17 1.60 1.75 1.33 1.25 1.00 2.50 1.60 1.67
CIV412 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 2.17 2.17 1.33 2.33 1.80 2.00 2.67 2.00 2.00
CIV413 Project Planning and Management 1.80 1.80 1.50 2.50 1.83 2.50 1.00 1.80 2.00 1.83
CIV414 Environmental Engineering-II 2.20 3.00 3.00 2.20 1.80 2.20 2.20 2.60 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.20
CIV415(A) Environmental Impact Assessment 3.00 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.67 2.67 2.50 1.50 3.00 2.00 3.00
CIV416 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering 1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25
CIV417 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.67
CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 2.33 1.83 1.67 1.00 1.80 2.33 1.80 2.33 1.00 1.67 1.00 2.50 1.80 2.50
CIV419 Industrial Training 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV421 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 2.17 1.17 1.60 1.00 1.50 1.00 2.17 1.60 1.80
CIV422 Water Resources Engineering-II 1.83 1.33 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.00 2.33 1.00 1.83 2.17 1.67
CIV423(B) Solid Waste Management 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.25 2.00 1.67 2.75 2.33 2.75
CIV424(B) Ground Improvement Techniques 1.00 1.50 1.83 1.83 1.80 1.67 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.83
CIV424(C) Prestressed Concrete 3.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.25
CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
56
TABLE 3.1.3 COURSE – PO/PSO CORRELATION MATRIX
CAYm2 2016-17
Note: Correlation levels 1, 2 or 3 are as defined below: 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High); “-”: No correlation
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV113 Engineering Physics 3.00 2.67 2.33 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.75 1.00
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 2.20 1.40 3.00 2.20 3.00 2.40 3.00
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 2.50 1.50 2.67 2.33 2.75 3.00 2.00 2.50 2.33 3.00
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00
CIV118 Workshop 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 3.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 2.83 2.33 1.33 1.67 1.83 2.83 1.67 1.83
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.25 1.50 1.60 1.60 2.40 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.50 2.00
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.60 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.20 1.60 1.25 1.50
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.33
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00
57
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 3.00 2.60 2.20 2.67 2.75 1.00 2.80 2.67
CIV212 Building Technology 3.00 2.33 2.17 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.75 1.00 2.67 3.00
CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.50 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 2.00
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 3.00 2.80 1.75 1.60 1.00 2.80 1.60
CIV215 Surveying– I 2.80 2.60 1.50 1.00 2.40 1.00 1.80 1.80 1.00 1.80 2.60 2.00
CIV216 Strength of Materials 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.40 1.40 3.00 2.40
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 2.40 1.50 1.67 2.00 1.60 1.80 1.33 2.60 2.00
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
CIV221 Concrete Technology 2.00 2.40 2.00 2.75 2.40 2.75 1.00 2.40 2.80 2.75
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 1.83 2.17 1.50 1.75 1.83 2.17 1.75
CIV224 Surveying – II 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 2.60 1.20 3.00 2.40
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.33 3.00 2.33
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.00 2.67 1.67 2.50 3.00 2.83 2.67 2.67
3.00 2.33 2.17
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 1.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.50
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 2.33 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 2.33 2.00
CIV311 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.20 2.00 1.20 2.67 2.00 2.17
58
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV312 Steel Structures-I 3.00 2.17 2.50 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.25
CIV313 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.83 1.50 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.17 1.83
CIV314 Geotechnical Engineering-I 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.40 3.00 1.75 1.00 2.83 2.60 2.00
CIV315 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 2.83 2.83 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.67 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.17
CIV316 Estimation and Quantity Surveying 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33
CIV317 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 3.00
CIV318 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 1.00 1.80 1.33 2.67 1.00 1.33 1.17 1.00 1.67 2.00 1.67
CIV319 Soft skills Lab 2.50 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.80
CIV321 Structural Analysis-III 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.33 3.00 2.33 1.00
CIV322 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.00 2.67 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.17 2.00 1.00 2.83 2.00 2.17
CIV323 Steel Structures-II 3.00 2.17 1.67 1.40 1.00 2.67 1.67
CIV324 Geotechnical Engineering-II 2.80 3.00 2.83 2.60 1.75 2.25 1.25 3.00 2.20 2.25
CIV325 Fluid Mechanics-III 1.60 1.80 2.33 1.83 1.00 1.67 1.50 2.17 1.67
CIV 326(A) Repair and Rehabilitation of structures
3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
CIV 326(B) Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems
2.00 1.50 2.00 1.50 2.33 1.67 1.33 2.00 1.33 1.33 2.00 2.33 2.00
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 1.33 2.33 2.00 2.40 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.25 2.17 2.00 2.17
CIV328 Concrete Lab 1.17 1.17 1.17 2.00 1.67 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 2.00
59
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV411 Water Resources Engineering-I 2.33 2.17 1.60 1.75 1.33 1.25 1.00 2.50 1.60 1.50
CIV412 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 2.17 2.17 1.33 2.33 1.80 2.00 2.67 2.00 2.00
CIV413 Project Planning and Management 1.80 1.80 1.50 2.50 1.83 2.50 1.00 1.80 2.00 1.83
CIV414 Environmental Engineering-II 2.20 3.00 3.00 2.20 1.80 2.20 2.20 2.60 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.20
CIV415 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering
1.75 1.75 2.25 1.50 2.67 2.00 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25
CIV416(C) Elements of Solid Waste Management 2.50 2.67 2.33 2.00 2.50 3.00 2.25 2.00 1.67 2.75 2.33 2.75
CIV417 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.67
CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 2.33 1.83 1.67 1.00 2.33 1.00 2.50 1.00
CIV419 Industrial Training 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50
CIV421 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 2.17 1.17 1.60 1.00 1.50 1.00 2.17 1.60 1.60
CIV422 Water Resources Engineering-II 1.83 1.33 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.00 2.33 1.00 1.83 2.17 1.50
CIV423(C) Air Pollution Control 2.60 2.20 2.20 2.20 1.80 2.00 2.60 2.60 3.00 2.40 2.00 2.20
CIV423(D) Ground Improvement Techniques 1.00 1.50 1.83 1.83 1.80 1.67 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.33
CIV424 Irrigation Structures-Design & Drawing 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.17
CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
60
3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course Outcome is based (10) (Examples of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to, specific exam/tutorial questions, assignments, laboratory tests, project evaluation, student portfolios (A portfolio is a collection of artifacts that demonstrate skills, personal characteristics and accomplishments created by the student during study period), internally developed assessment exams, project presentations, oral exams etc.)
ANITS was accorded UGC Autonomous status in 2015 and hence the Autonomous Acade mic regulations R15 are followed for students admitted in 2015-16 and later. For students admitted prior to 2015-16, Andhra university academic regulations are followed.
ASSESSMENT OF COURSE OUTCOMES UNDER AUTONOMOUS REGULATIONS R15
Tools for Course Outcome assessment The various assessment tools evaluate student’s knowledge and ability to apply their knowledge and skills in continuous assessments like Mid examinations, Assignments, Class test, Seminar/quiz, end semester examinations, Project work seminars, industrial training viva-voce or laboratory course internal and end semester examinations and viva-voce, etc. These tools are the evidence of student learning.
Assessment of Course Outcomes is based upon the performance in each semester in (a) Internal Evaluation (IE) (b) End Semester Examination (ESE)
For students admitted into I Year in the Academic year 2015-16 and later (Autonomous Regulations R15), Total Internal assessment is for 40 marks for theory courses (20 for mid exams, 10 for assignments, 5 for class test/quiz/seminar and 5 for class work attendance) and end semester exam is for 60 marks.
There are two mid exams per semester each conducted for 40 marks and reduced to 20 marks and average of these mid marks is taken for final evaluation. Two assignments are conducted and the average for 10 marks is taken. One class test/quiz/seminar is conducted and reduced for 5 marks. For Class work attendance, 5 marks are given if the attendance is ≥95%; 4 marks for ≥90%; 3 marks for ≥85%; 2 marks for ≥80% and 1 mark for ≥75% attendance.
In case of laboratory courses, the internal assessment is for 50 marks and end semester exam for 50 marks. The internal Evaluation consists of 15 marks for observation, 10 marks for Record, 10 marks for internal exam, 10 marks for viva voce and 5 marks for class work attendance. The observations including weekly viva voce (15 marks) and record marks (10 marks) are evaluated continuously for each experiment/exercise and the average marks for all experiments/exercises are considered for final evaluation.
Assessment of COs in Internal Evaluation (IE)
Mapping of COs The questions for mid exams are mapped with relevant COs. As an example, if Q.1a addresses CO1, CO2 and Q.1b addresses CO3, the distribution of marks is 25% for CO1, 25% for CO2 and 50% for CO3. In this way, the maximum marks as well as marks secured for each question by all students is distributed among the relevant COs. Assignments, class test and class work attendance address all COs and the marks are uniformly distributed among all COs.
Assessment of COs attainment In this way, the maximum marks and the marks secured by each student for each CO is evaluated in an Excel spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. Faculty members are trained for conducting assessment of CO attainment. The work is reviewed by two CO assessment coordinators as well as by HoD. The percentage of marks secured by each student in each CO is evaluated.
61
Assessment of COs in End Semester Examination (ESE) A double valuation procedure is adopted in the ESE. Valuation I by the internal examiner and Valuation II by the external examiner are carried out anonymously, based on the scheme of valuation prepared by the Internal examiner, who is the faculty member of the concerned subject. The average of the marks secured in the two valuations is considered. If the marks secured for any student(s) in any course differ by more than 20% between the two valuations, the script(s) are subjected to III valuation. In this case, the average of III valuation marks and the marks of I or II valuation, whichever is closer to III valuation marks is taken for final evaluation.
The mapping of COs for each question, the evaluation of maximum marks and the marks secured by each student in each CO are evaluated in a similar manner as in internal evaluation, except that the weighted average marks of I and II valuations (and III in case of III valuation) are considered for each question. The assessment of COs attainment is done in an Excel Spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. ASSESSMENT OF COURSE OUTCOMES UNDER ANDHRA UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS R07/R14
Assessment tools For students admitted into I Year prior to Academic year 2015-16, the Total Internal assessment is for 30 marks for theory courses (15 for mid exams and 10 for assignments and 5 for class work attendance) and end semester exam is for 70 marks. There are two mid exams per semester each conducted for 30 marks and reduced to 15 marks and average of these mid marks is taken for final evaluation. Two assignments are conducted and the average for 10 marks is taken. For Class work attendance, 5 marks are given if the attendance is ≥95%; 4 marks for ≥90%; 3 marks for ≥85%; 2 marks for ≥80% and 1 mark for ≥75% attendance.
In case of laboratory courses, the internal assessment is for 50 marks and end semester exam for 50 marks. The internal evaluation and End semester Exam and the assessment of COs is done in the same way as in Autonomous Regulations R15.
Andhra University does not declare marks secured by students in End Semester exam but gives the grade secured by students in each course combining the internal marks sent by ANITS and the marks secured by students in End Semester exam. The marks secured by students in End semester exam are therefore not available. Hence the assessment of COs is done based on the grades (which includes both internal and external exam marks in the ratio 30:70) secured by students based on the equivalent marks corresponding to each grade into as per University norms (see Table below).
Grade O A B C D E F
Grade points 10 9 8 7 6 5 <4
Equivalent marks 100 90 80 70 60 50 -
The question-wise marks/grades are also not available in the results declared by Andhra University. Hence assessment (ESE) is done for the entire course using the following procedure. The attainment level for the course is considered equivalent to the attainment levels of all COs for the course.
For each course, the number of students who scored grade D (GP=60% marks) or higher is noted as N60
The percentage of students in the class who score at least 60 percent marks in the course is then calculated using the following equation
1006060
N
Np
Where N= Number of students who appeared in the examination for that course
Assessment of COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The CO attainment based on internal evaluation is analyzed for feedback and improvement. The
62
procedure adopted is similar to that in Autonomous Regulations except for two differences.
Mapping of COs The questions for mid exams are mapped with relevant COs. As an example, if Q.1a addresses CO1, CO2 and Q.1b addresses CO3, the distribution of marks is 25% for CO1, 25% for CO2 and 50% for CO3. In this way, the maximum marks as well as marks secured for each question by all students is distributed among the relevant COs. Assignments and class work attendance address all COs and the marks are uniformly distributed among all COs.
Assessment of COs attainment In this way, the maximum marks and the marks secured by each student for each CO is evaluated in an Excel spread sheet for each course by the concerned faculty member. The percentage of marks secured by each student in each CO is evaluated.
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment levels (40) Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses. (The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect to the Course Outcomes of a course in addition to the performance in the University examination)
The attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses is recorded with respect to the Set attainment levels as given below. Sample record for CAYm1 2017-18 is also given below.
SET ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR COs UNDER AUTONOMOUS REGULATIONS R15
Set Attainment Levels for COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The attainment of each CO in IE is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels
1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 0 2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 1 3) If 60% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 2 4) If 70% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 3
Set Attainment Levels for COs in End Semester Examination (ESE) The attainment level in ESE in each CO is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels
1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 0 2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 1 3) If 60% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 2 4) If 70% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 3
The overall attainment level in each CO is evaluated by giving 60% weightage for End semester examination and 40% weightage for internal evaluation.
63
Example The example for assessment of CO attainment for a course in IE and ESE is illustrated in Table below.
Course: Surveying-II, II Year II Semester, Year: 2017-18 Faculty: T.V.V.Teja
Course Outcome 224.1 224.2 224.3 224.4 224.5
% students of class having at least 60% marks (IE)
87.9 56.1 86.4 78.8 50.0
CO Attainment level (IE) 3 0 2 2 2
% students of class having at least 60% marks (ESE)
87.9 51.5 51.5 51.5 57.6
CO Attainment level (ESE) 3 1 1 1 1
CO Attainment level (Overall)
3 0.6 (0.4x2)+(0.6x1)
=1.4
(0.4x2)+(0.6x1)
=1.4
(0.4x2)+(0.6x1)
=1.4
SET ATTAINMENT LEVELS FOR COs UNDER ANDHRA UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS R07/R14 The attainment level in each Course is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels
1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 0
2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 1
3) If 60% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 2
4) If 70% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks (Grade D or higher Grade) in the Course, the attainment level is 3
It may be noted here once again that the Grades awarded by Andhra University in each course include both Sessional marks (30% weightage) and marks scored in ESE (70% weightage). The marks secured in ESE are not communicated by the University. Hence, the attainment level as evaluated above reflects overall attainment in the course for each CO.
Set Attainment Levels for COs in Internal Evaluation (IE) The CO attainment based on internal evaluation is analyzed for feedback and improvement. The procedure adopted is similar to that in Autonomous Regulations except for two differences.
Assessment of COs attainment The attainment of each CO is evaluated using the following Set Course Outcome attainment levels
1) If <50% students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 0 2) If 50% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 1 3) If 60% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 2 4) If 70% or more students of the class secure at least 60% marks in the CO, the attainment level is 3
The CO attainment levels evaluated for IE of all courses (R15/R14/R07 Regulations) for all academic years are compiled in Table B 3.2.2a. The CO attainment levels evaluated for ESE (R15 Regulations) for all academic years are compiled in Table B 3.2.2b.
The overall CO attainment levels evaluated for all academic years (R15/R14/R07 Regulations) are compiled in Table B 3.2.2c. From this data, the Course attainment level for each course is determined by taking the average of the attainment levels of the COs for that course.
The Record of attainment of COs with respect to the set attainment levels for CAY (2018-19) is given in Annexure-8.
64
3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50) 3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10) (Describe the assessment tools and processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out. Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes are attained and document the attainment levels)
Following are the assessment tools used for measuring the attainment of POs and PSOs;
1) Direct Assessment Direct attainment level of a PO / PSO is determined by the following procedure
1) For a given PO (say PO1), Calculate the attainment level for each course, considering the COs which map with this PO.
2) For example, consider PO1 and Course CIV211, the attainment levels of the COs for this course and the correlation levels with PO1 are shown below
Course CIV211, Engineering Mathematics-II in II Year II Semester CAYm1 2017-18
CO Attainment level
Correlation level with PO1
CIV211.1 3 3 CIV211.2 3 3
CIV211.3 3 0
CIV211.4 3 0
CIV211.5 2 0
3) To determine the Attainment level for PO1 from this course, the CO attainment level for each CO is multiplied with the corresponding Correlation levels. Their sum is then divided with the the sum of the correlation levels. Only the COs (CIV211.1, CIV211.2) which correlate with the PO (PO1) are considered in the calculation. Hence attainment level for PO1, for this Course is obtained as
4) The attainment levels for PO1, is determined for all other courses in a similar manner. The results are shown in Table B 3.3.2 for three Academic years.
5) The average of the attainment levels from all courses obtained in Step3 is then determined for the PO, considering the courses which correlate to the PO.
6) Similarly, the attainment levels for all POs/PSOs are determined following steps and the results are shown in Table B 3.3.1a.
2) Indirect Assessment Indirect assessment of POs & PSOs is evaluated by the following assessment tools: exit survey (40%); Feedback from parents (10%); Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%); Co-curricular and Extra-curricular activities (20%); Percentage of students placed or pursuing higher studies or entrepreneurship (10%).
Assessment of Indirect attainment of POs and PSOs is carried out with the following tools
1) Exit Surveys from the out-going final year students (40%)
2) Feedback from parents (10%)
3) Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%)
4) Participation and Achievements of students in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities (20%)
5) Placements, Higher studies and entrepreneurship (10%)
65
The weightages allocated for the assessment tools are indicated within parentheses against the respective
tool.
1) Exit Survey from the out-going final year students (40%)
Exit surveys are conducted annually from the IV Year II Semester students towards the end of class work.
The Survey form used in exit surveys is enclosed in Annexure-9. Exit survey forms are distributed to the
students in the class and the students are asked to give their feedback anonymously. There is no
compulsion for students to write their name and Register number on the filled-in form. While written
survey forms were used in the year 2015-16, on-line feedback was taken w.e.f. the year 2016-17.
The feedback points in exit survey are the POs and PSOs of the program. Students give rating of 1 (High), 2
(Moderate) or 3 (Low) to indicate the attainment of POs/PSOs. The sample size for exit surveys is generally
about 90% of the class strength. The attainment level from exit surveys is then calculated as
123
123 123
NNN
NNNlevelAttainment
2) Feedback from parents (10%)
Feedback from the parents is collected during their visit to the Department as per the feedback form
shown in Annexure-10. The feedback form contains questions which indirectly reflect some of the
POs/PSOs. The attainment level for each PO/PSO, mapping with the feedback points, is calculated as
follows:
123
123 123
NNN
NNNlevelAttainment
3) Feedback from Recruiters/Employers (20%)
Feedback is taken Recruiters during campus placements which is analysed. Sample Recruiter’s feedback
form is enclosed in Annexure-11. Recruiters feedback is on 5 point scale and the attainment level is
calculated as follows:
12345
12345 12345
NNNNN
NNNNNlevelAttainment
4) Participation and Achievements of students in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities (20%)
Indirect assessment of PO/PSO attainment is also made by considering the number of students
participating in co-curricular /extra-curricular activities both within and outside the campus as well as the
achievements in terms of prizes won by the students.
Assessment of PO/PSO attainment The attainment of PO/PSO is evaluated using the following Set PO/PSO attainment levels
1) If <15% students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is 0 2) If 15% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is
1 3) If 30% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is
2 4) If 40% or more students participate in Co-curricular/Extra-curricular activities, the attainment level is
3
66
5) Placements, Higher studies and entrepreneurship (10%)
The number of placements secured by the students, number of students qualifying in GATE/PGCET/GRE
etc and number of students securing admissions in higher learning institutes for M.Tech./MS including
entrepreneurship indirectly reflect the PO/PSO attainment.
Assessment of PO/PSO attainment The attainment of PO/PSO is evaluated using the following Set PO/PSO attainment levels
1) If <40% students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 0
2) If 40% or more students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 1
3) If 50% or more students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 2
4) If 60% or more students are placed through recruitment/ higher studies /entrepreneurship, the attainment level is 3
The total indirect attainment of each PO/PSO is determined by adding the attainment through the five
components according to their respective weightages.
Overall/Combined PO/PSO attainment
The overall attainment for each PO/PSO is determined by adding the respective attainment from direct
and indirect attainment in the ratio 80%:20%.
67
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO (40) Program shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all POs & PSOs. (The attainment levels by direct (student performance) and indirect (surveys) are to be presented through Program level Course – PO & PSO matrix as indicated).
Table 3.3.2 PO/PSO Attainment Levels for each Course
CAY 2018-19
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 1.60 1.60 1.62 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.62
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.08 1.08 0.93 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.21 1.30 1.30 0.80 0.87 0.80
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.98 1.98 2.16 1.85 2.03 2.00 2.00 2.02 1.85 2.00
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20
CIV118 Workshop 2.80 2.60 2.80 2.60
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 0.89 0.87 0.93 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.94 0.89
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.80 2.00 1.63 1.63 1.58 1.25 2.00 1.50 1.67 1.80 2.00 1.56
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 0.73 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.63 0.73 0.95 0.50
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
CIV127 Language Lab 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 2.00 1.80
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 1.70 1.15 1.33 1.98 1.20 2.50 1.10 1.98
CIV212 Building Technology 3.00 2.44 2.54 2.25 2.25 2.28 2.18 2.60 2.51 2.50
CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.80 1.83 1.65 1.65 1.30 1.42 1.58 1.30 1.60 1.70 1.52 1.52
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 2.08 2.04 1.97 2.10 2.10 2.04 2.10
CIV215 Surveying– I 1.43 1.38 1.87 1.35 1.10 1.33 1.44 1.40 1.36 1.38 1.35
CIV216 Strength of Materials 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
68
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
CIV221 Concrete Technology 0.60 0.67 0.68 0.78 0.67 0.75 0.87 0.67 0.70 0.75
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.07 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 0.20 0.23 0.60 0.30 0.26 0.17 0.30
CIV224 Surveying – II 1.32 1.32 0.90 0.90 1.37 1.33 1.32 1.42
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.73 0.71
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 1.30 1.28 1.36 1.24 1.33 1.35 1.28 1.28 1.33 1.29 1.31 1.35
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II 2.40 1.80 1.87 1.95 1.92 1.60 1.60 1.92 1.80 1.85 1.85 1.80
CIV313 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.76 1.72 1.72 1.71
CIV314 Structural Analysis – II 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80
CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II 0.90 0.70 0.68 0.64 0.50 0.67 0.70 0.64
CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 2.04 2.13 1.80 2.10 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.10
CIV317 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV318 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude -I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV3111 Technical Seminar 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.78 2.80 2.80 2.90
CIV322 Estimation & Costing 2.36 2.45 2.36 2.40 2.40 2.45 2.40 2.40
CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 2.20 2.27 2.20 3.00 2.76 2.54 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.76 2.54
CIV324 Transportation Engineering-I 1.08 1.03 1.03 0.98 0.87 0.80 1.05 1.08 0.98 1.11
CIV325 Water Resources Engineering – I 1.85 1.72 2.03 1.69 2.03 1.85 1.84 1.80 1.69 2.04
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-I
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
69
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude –II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano Technology) 2.88 2.93 3.00 2.88 2.83 3.00 3.00 2.90 2.88 2.70 2.88 2.88 2.85 3.00
CIV412 Professional Elective - II (Air Pollution & control)
2.84 2.85 2.87 2.80 2.87 2.85 2.85 2.88 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.88 2.82 2.93
CIV413 Project Planning & Management 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.04 3.00 3.00 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.14 2.10 2.20 2.60
CIV414 Steel Structures 1.42 1.10 1.11 1.11 1.20 1.32 1.10 1.13 1.50 1.49 2.20 1.42 1.47 1.10
CIV415 Water Resources Engineering - II 1.32 1.36 1.26 1.38 1.35 1.31 1.40 1.38 1.45 1.40 1.30 1.35 1.37 1.38
CIV416 Transportation Engineering-II 2.60 2.62 2.68 2.60 2.45 2.57 2.60 2.60 2.6
CIV417 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV418 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV419 Project work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV4110 Industrial Training 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV 421(D) Professional Elective – III (Ground Improvement Techniques)
2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.18 2.18 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.10 2.16
CIV423 Engineering Economics & Finance 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV424 Irrigation Structures Design & Drawing 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV426 Project Work - II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Direct Attainment 2.04 1.98 2.05 2.07 2.11 2.24 2.03 2.24 2.48 2.32 2.18 1.97 1.99 2.02 2.13
Indirect Attainment 2.09 2.18 1.97 1.97 2.04 2.37 2.24 2.16 2.44 2.12 2.00 2.22 2.18 2.04 2.37
Overall Attainment 2.05 2.02 2.04 2.05 2.10 2.27 2.07 2.22 2.47 2.28 2.14 2.02 2.02 2.02 2.17
70
Table 3.3.2 PO/PSO Attainment Levels for each Course
CAYm1 2017-18
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.12 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.12
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.80 1.78 1.83 1.80 1.70 1.80 1.74 1.80
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 0.95 0.80 1.04 0.95 1.04 0.90 1.04
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.94 2.00 2.23 1.66 1.95 1.85 1.85 1.94 1.66 1.85
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 1.18 1.16 0.95 1.06 1.15 1.18 1.06 1.15
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.68 0.93 1.70 1.65 1.77 2.20 0.80 1.40 1.73 1.68 0.93 1.73
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.05 1.05 0.96 1.20 1.40 0.96 0.80 1.05 0.96 0.90
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 1.50 1.25 1.29 1.43 1.20 1.50 1.24 1.43
CIV212 Building Technology 2.20 2.40 2.45 2.70 2.70 2.52 2.67 3.00 2.33 2.40
CIV213 Engineering Geology 2.60 2.65 2.40 2.40 2.13 2.20 2.33 2.10 2.43 2.50 2.28 2.28
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 1.36 1.29 1.49 1.23 1.30 1.29 1.23
CIV215 Surveying– I 1.14 1.17 0.67 1.22 1.30 1.24 1.11 1.15 1.27 1.17 1.22
CIV216 Strength of Materials 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.83 0.80 0.82
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV221 Concrete Technology 1.70 2.22 2.28 2.42 2.18 2.51 2.60 2.22 2.30 2.51
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 1.70 1.75 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.69 1.70 1.70 1.70 1.70
71
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 0.96 1.17 1.40 1.31 1.13 1.03 1.31
CIV224 Surveying – II 1.56 1.56 1.27 1.40 1.58 1.53 1.56 1.60
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.01 0.95 1.10 1.01
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.60 2.70 2.52 2.68 2.60 2.58 2.70 2.70 2.60 2.66 2.63 2.65
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV312 Environmental Engineering-II 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20
CIV313 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.40 1.36 1.36 1.36
CIV314 Structural Analysis – II 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.60 0.85 0.72 0.68 0.10 1.13 0.85 0.68
CIV316 Geotechnical Engineering – I 1.35 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.32 1.50 1.20
CIV317 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV318 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude -I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
CIV3111 Technical Seminar 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 2.56 2.56 2.56 2.51 2.56 2.56 2.72
CIV322 Estimation & Costing 2.60 2.75 2.60 2.67 2.67 2.75 2.67 2.67
CIV323 Geotechnical Engineering – II 1.73 1.70 1.70 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.65 1.73 1.80 1.80
CIV324 Transportation Engineering-I 2.52 2.49 2.49 2.46 2.50 2.55 2.51 2.52 2.46 2.31
CIV325 Water Resources Engineering – I 2.20 2.16 2.20 2.09 2.17 2.70 2.12 2.26 2.09 1.96
CIV 326(D) RS & GIS applications in Civil
Engineering 2.20 2.40 3.00 1.80 2.23 2.04 2.40 2.20 2.40 2.25 2.20 2.23 2.50
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV328 Computer Applications in Civil
Engineering Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
72
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal Aptitude –II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV411 Water Resources Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV412 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV413 Project Planning and Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV414 Environmental Engineering-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV415(A) Environmental Impact Assessment 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV416 Computer Applications in Civil
Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV417 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV419 Industrial Training 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV421 Transportation Engineering-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV422 Water Resources Engineering-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV423(B) Solid Waste Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV424(B) Ground Improvement Techniques 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV424(C) Prestressed Concrete 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Direct Attainment 2.27 2.24 2.30 2.31 2.50 2.54 2.39 2.45 2.85 2.58 2.40 2.26 2.28 2.30 2.46
Indirect Attainment 2.09 2.18 1.97 2.14 2.04 2.37 2.16 2.24 2.44 2.12 2.00 2.28 2.08 2.10 2.26
Overall Attainment 2.24 2.23 2.23 2.27 2.41 2.50 2.35 2.41 2.76 2.49 2.32 2.26 2.24 2.26 2.42
73
Table 3.3.2 PO/PSO Attainment Levels for each Course
CAYm2 2016-17
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.00
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.60 1.48 1.74 1.60 1.70 1.60 1.66 1.60
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 1.71 1.60 1.84 1.71 1.84 1.70 1.84
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.52 1.60 1.70 1.49 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.52 1.49 1.40
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 0.91 0.89 0.88 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 2.64 2.00 2.70 2.63 2.70 3.00 1.80 2.40 2.60 2.64 2.00 2.58
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.15 1.10 1.12 1.07 1.20 1.12 1.13 1.15 1.12 1.20
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV211 Engineering Mathematics-III 2.40 1.55 1.76 2.55 1.47 2.80 1.57 2.55
CIV212 Building Technology 1.87 1.81 1.86 2.00 2.00 2.28 1.91 2.27 1.75 1.77
CIV213 Engineering Geology 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.33 1.27 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.32 1.32
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics 0.68 0.73 0.86 0.78 1.20 0.73 0.78
CIV215 Surveying– I 1.63 1.66 1.33 1.68 1.68 1.70 1.73 1.60 1.75 1.71 1.66 1.68
CIV216 Strength of Materials 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.37
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV221 Concrete Technology 1.80 1.40 1.40 1.55 1.47 1.29 1.53 1.40 1.44 1.29
CIV222 Environmental Engineering-I 1.45 1.47 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.47 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.45
74
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I 1.27 1.38 1.87 1.66 1.35 1.32 1.66
CIV224 Surveying – II 1.40 1.40 1.13 1.20 1.43 1.37 1.40 1.45
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.17 1.23 1.10 1.17
CIV226 Building Planning & Drawing 2.13 2.25 2.04 2.23 2.13 2.11 2.25 2.25
2.13 2.20 2.17
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV311 Reinforced Concrete Structures-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV312 Steel Structures-I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV313 Fluid Mechanics-II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
CIV314 Geotechnical Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV315 Environmental Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV316 Estimation and Quantity Surveying 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV317 Environmental Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV318 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV319 Softskills Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV321 Structural Analysis-III 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CIV322 Reinforced Concrete Structures-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV323 Steel Structures-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV324 Geotechnical Engineering-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV325 Fluid Mechanics-III 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
CIV 326(A) Repair and Rehabilitation of
structures 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV 326(B) Remote Sensing and Geographical
Information Systems 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV327 Geotechnical Engineering Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV328 Concrete Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
75
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV411 Water Resources Engineering-I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV412 Transportation Engineering-I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV413 Project Planning and Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV414 Environmental Engineering-II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV415 Computer Applications in Civil
Engineering 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV416(C) Elements of Solid Waste
Management 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV417 Transportation Engineering Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV418 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV419 Industrial Training 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV421 Transportation Engineering-II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV422 Water Resources Engineering-II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CIV423(C) Air Pollution Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CIV423(D) Ground Improvement Techniques 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CIV424 Irrigation Structures-Design&Drawing 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV425 Project Work 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Direct Attainment 2.17 2.09 2.17 2.13 2.32 2.33 2.04 2.28 2.80 2.48 2.41 2.18 2.17 2.19 2.24
Indirect Attainment 2.62 2.62 2.32 2.50 2.49 2.61 2.64 2.56 2.84 2.52 2.53 2.68 2.52 2.50 2.62
Overall Attainment 2.26 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.35 2.39 2.16 2.33 2.81 2.48 2.44 2.28 2.24 2.25 2.31
76
CRITERION 4 Students’ Performance 150
4. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE (150)
Table B.4a
Item (Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts
with explicit headings, wherever applicable)
CAY (2018-19)
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 60 60 60
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of students migrated to this program (N1)
48 56 55
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry (N2)
* 16 16
Separate division students, if applicable (N3) - - -
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)
* 72 71
*Admissions into II Year under Lateral entry are in progress.
CAY – Current Academic Year
CAYm1- Current Academic Year minus1= Current Assessment Year
CAYm2 - Current Academic Year minus2=Current Assessment Year minus 1
LYG – Last Year Graduate
LYGm1 – Last Year Graduate minus 1
LYGm2 – Last Year Graduate minus 2
Table B.4b
Year of entry
N1 + N2 + N3 (As defined above)
Number of students who have successfully graduated without
backlogs in any semester/year of study
(Without Backlog means no compartment or failures in any
semester/year of study) I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY (2018-19) (48+*+0)=*
CAYm1(2017-18) (56+16+0)=72 33
CAYm2(2016-17) (55+16+0)=71 35 30+15
CAYm3(2015-16) (54+18+0) = 72 35 29+13 28+12
CAYm4(LYG) (2014-15) (53+15+1) = 69 34 28+8 21+8 20+8
CAYm5(LYGm1) (2013-14) (53+14+0) = 71 38 22+6 19+0 16+0
CAYm6 (LYGm2) (2012-13) (59+12+0) = 71 35 29+8 26+8 26+8
*Admissions into II Year under Lateral entry are in progress.
77
Table B.4c
Year of entry
N1 + N2 + N3 (As defined above)
Number of students who have successfully graduated (student with backlog in stipulated period of study)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY (2018-19) (48+*+0)=*
CAYm1 (2017-18) (56+16+0)=72 3
CAYm2 (2016-17) (55+16+0)=71 2 1+1
CAYm3 (2015-16) (54+18+0) = 72 2 3+1 4+2
CAYm4 (LYG) (2014-15)
(53+15+1) = 69 6 5+3 9+4 14+5
CAYm5 (LYGm1) (2013-14)
(53+14+0) = 71 4 1+1 13+7 6+2
CAYm6 (LYGm2) (2012-13)
(59+12+0) = 71 0 6+0 4+0 6+3
*Admissions into II Year under Lateral entry are in progress.
4.1 Enrolment ratio (20)
Table B 4.1
S.No. Academic Year N1 N N1/N (%) MARKS
1. CAY (2018-19) 48 60 80 18
2. CAYm1 (2017-18) 56 60 93.33 20
3. CAYm2(2016-17) 55 60 91.66 20
Average 19.33
Item (Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis during the period of assessment)
Marks
>=90% students enrolled 20
>=80% students enrolled 18
>=70% students enrolled 16
>=60% students enrolled 14
Otherwise 0
78
4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40) 4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25) SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog) / (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable) Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × Average SI
Table B 4.2.1
Item
Latest Year of Graduation, LYG
(CAYm4) (2014-15)
Latest Year of Graduation minus 1, LYGm1 (CAYm5)
(2013-14)
Latest Year of Graduation minus 2,LYGm2 (CAYm6)
(2012-13)
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable
69 71 71
Number of students who have graduated without backlogs in the stipulated period
28 16 34
Success Index (SI) 0.405 0.225 0.478
Average SI 0.369
Success Rate 25x0.369 = 9.2
4.2.2. Success rate in stipulated period (15) SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 15 × Average SI
Table B 4.2.2
Item
LYG (CAYm4) (2014-15)
LYGm1 (CAYm5) (2013-14)
LYGm2 (CAYm6) (2012-13)
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable
71 71 71
Number of students who have graduated in the stipulated period 47 44 53
Success Index (SI) 0.661 0.619 0.746
Average Success Index 0.675
Success Rate 15x0.675 = 10.1
79
Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable simultaneously.
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15) Academic Performance = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year.
Table B 4.3
Academic Performance CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
CAYm3 (2015-16)
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful
students (X) 7.90 7.31 6.16
Total no. of successful students (Y) 48 37 36
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 71 71 65
API = x* (Y/Z) 5.34 3.81 3.41
Average API = (AP1+AP2+AP3)/3 4.18
Academic Performance 1.5x4.18= 6.3
4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index)
API = ((Mean of 2nd Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.
Table B 4.4
Academic Performance
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
CAYm3 (2015-16)
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X)
7.91 7.89 7.41
Total no. of successful students (Y) 46 48 36
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 66 71 70
API = X* (Y/Z) 5.51 5.33 3.81
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 4.88
Academic Performance
1.5x4.88= 7.3
80
4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40) Assessment Points = 40 × average placement
Table B 4.5
Item CAYm1 2017-18
CAYm2 2016-17
CAYm3 2015-16
Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 71 65 70
No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector (x) 15 22 30
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)
09 5 7
No. of students turned entrepreneur in engineering/technology (z) 0 0 0
x + y + z = 24 27 37
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.33 0.41 0.53
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.42
Assessment points = 40 x 0.42 = 16.8
4.5a. Provide the placement data in the below mentioned format with the name of the program and the assessment year:
Table B 4.5a Placement data
B.Tech Civil Engineering CAY m1 (2017-18)
S.
No.
Name of the student
placed
Enrolment
No.
Name of the
Employer
Appointment
letter reference
No. with date
1 Pachamatla
Suryanarayana Raju
314126508034 Infosys Infosys/1
2 G.Sai Lkashmi
314126508019
KEC International
Limited
KEC/1
3 Ganji Rakesh 314126508015
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/1
4 Gunnam Sri Sai Lakshmi 314126508019
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/2
5 Pinninti Srinivasa Rao 314126508038
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/3
6 Vambaravelli Naveen
Kumar
314126508048
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/4
7 Kurmadasu Sai Sailendra 314126508057
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/5
8 Mukala Pavankumar 314126508065
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/6
9 Ashok Panigrahi 314126508066
Krikamit Engg. Pvt.
Ltd.
Krikamit/7
81
S.
No.
Name of the student
placed
Enrolment
No.
Name of the
Employer
Appointment
letter reference
No. with date
10 Vambaravelli Naveen
Kumar
314126508048 KPTL
KPTL/1
11 Ashok Panigrahi 314126508066
KPTL
KPTL/2
12 Karri Manikanta Reddy 314126508023
Sobha Developers
Pvt.Ltd., Sobha developers/1
13 Mukala Pavankumar 314126508065
Sobha Developers
Pvt.Ltd., Sobha developers/2
14 Madabattula Sai Akhil 314126508030
Sicagen Pvt.Ltd., Sicagen/1
15 Vambaravelli Naveen
Kumar
314126508048 James Infinus Pvt Ltd
James Infinus/1
Table B 4.5a Placement data
B.Tech Civil Engineering CAY m2 (2016-17)
S. No.
Name of the student placed
Enrolment No.
Name of the Employer
Appointment letter reference
No. with date
1 Bankuru Prathima Lilly 313126508007 Infosys Infosys/1
2 Bobbili Sai Kumar 313126508009 Infosys Infosys/2
3 Chavvakula Divya Sirisha 313126508012 Infosys Infosys /3
4 GodavarthiRajani 313126508018 Infosys Infosys/4
5 V Satya Chakradhar 313126508054 Infosys Infosys/5
6 V Bhuvana 313126508058 Infosys Infosys/6
7 Arasada Venkata Durga Charan
313126508003 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/1
8 Kosuru Anantasairam 313126508032 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/2
9 N Harish Kumar 313126508061 Tech Mahindra Tech Mahindra/3
10 A Jayadev Rama Poorna Pavan
313126508001 Hayagreeva Constructions
Hayagreeva/1
11 Anudeep Kollu 313126508002 Nec, Naval Dockyard Contract
Naval dockyard/1
12 Malla Sree Sai Koushik 313126508034 Ramchandra Constructions
Ramachanra constructions/1
13 Md Ameer Javed 313126508036 Horiculture Engineer, Irrigation Department
Irrigation dept/1
82
S. No.
Name of the student placed
Enrolment No.
Name of the Employer
Appointment letter reference
No. with date
14 Natti Hema Sundar 313126508041 VR Constructions VR Constructions/1
15 Pilla Madhu 313126508043 SRK Constructions SRK Constructions/1
16 Sampathi Venkata Saiteja
313126508048 Opel Construction Opel Construction/1
17 Ummidi Chandrakala 313126508052 SDB Infrastructure SDB Infrastructure/1
18 K Ashok Kumar 313126508071 SDB Infrastructure SDB Infrastructure/2
19 V Dilip Kumar 313126508053 Murthy Constructions Murthy Construction/1
20 B Sruthi 313126508062 Ski Detail Company, Madhurawada
Ski Detail Company/1
21 D Naresh 313126508069 Meil, Hyderabad Meil, Hyderabad/1
22 G Hemalatha Devi 313126508072 Asst.Professor, VSM Engineering College
Asst.Professor/ VSM/1
Table B 4.5a Placement data
B.Tech. Civil Engineering CAY m3 (2015-16)
S. No.
Name of the student placed
Enrolment No.
Name of the Employer
Appointment letter reference
No. with date
1 A Srinivasa Soma Sekhar
312126508001 Infosys Infosys/1
2 B Koumudhi 312126508015 Infosys Infosys/2
3 D Siva Hemanth Reddy
312126508018 Infosys Infosys/3
4 G Malathi 312126508021 Infosys Infosys/4
5 P Sai Gopal 312126508043 Infosys Infosys/5
6 T Avinash 312126508054 Infosys Infosys/6
7 A Santhosh PraneethSrivatsav
312126508012 IBM IBM/1
8 ChSrinu 312126508016 IBM IBM/2
9 K Polaraju 312126508028 IBM IBM/3
10 P Taraka Laxman Gopal Chowdary
312126508045 IBM IBM/4
11 P Naga V Manikanta 312126508046 IBM IBM/5
83
S. No.
Name of the student placed
Enrolment No.
Name of the Employer
Appointment letter reference
No. with date
12 B Bhavani 312126508014 Mu sigma Mu sigma/1
13 G Pujitha 312126508023 Capgemini Capgemini/1
14 P Santosh Kumar 312126508049 Varun motor Varun/1
15 Rambabu K 312126508052 AEE, Govt of A.P Govt of A.P/1
16 K Vijay Babu 312126508060 AEE, Govt of A.P Govt of A.P/2
17 A BhaskarChowdary 312126508011 Grand Project Capital Grand project/1
18 M MounikaDivya 312126508034 Steigen Projects Steigen/1
19 O Poli Raju 312126508042 Trainee Engineer, Steigen Projects
Steigen/2
20 T Mahesh 312126508053 Graduate Trainee Engineer, MEIL
MEIL/1
21 Vema Reddy Gajjela 312126508057 Site Engineer, SRR projects Pvt ltd
SRR/1
22 Y Siva Sai Kiran 312126508058 KMM Technologies KMM/1
23 Y Sairajesh 312126508059 Iron Traingle Limited Iron triangle/1
24 Md Rahimunnisa Begum
312126508062 GEOCON Surveys GEOCON/1
25 D Lavanya 312126508063 J.E., R.R.B RRB/1
26 M Sailaja 312126508064 Moldtek Technologies Moldtek/1
27 K Vara Lakshmi 312126508065 Panchayat Raj Dept, Govt. of A.P.
PR/1
28 S Nookaratnam 312126508066 Lecturer, VITS college VITS/1
29 U Girish Kumar 312126508071 Guest Lecturer, Govt polytechnic, VSKP
Govt polytechnic/1
4.6. Professional Activities (20)
4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5) (The Department shall provide relevant details)
The details of professional society and chapters are given in Table B 4.6.1a. Faculty members are also members of various Professional Societies including 1) Institution of Engineers (India) 2) Indian Society for Technical Education 3) Indian Geotechnical Society 4) Indian Concrete Institute etc. Details of Events organized are given in Table B 4.6.1c.
84
Table B 4.6.1a Civil Engineering Students Chapters Membership Details
S. No
Name of Professional Society students chapter Members
CAY 2018-19
CAYm1 2017-18
CAYm2 2016-17
1 ASCE ANITS Students chapter - 136 -
2 Institution of Engineers (India) ANITS Civil Engineering students chapter
- 136 135
3 Indian Geotechnical Society ANITS students chapter inaugurated in 2018-19
66 - -
Tables B 4.6.1b Events Organized
CAY 2018 – 19
S. No
Event Schedule Resource person with designation
No. of Participents
1
Dr. K.L.Rao memorial Lecture on Rain Water Harvesting and Recharge of Ground Water
13-07-2018
Dr.T.V.Praveen Professor A.U. College of Engineering, Andhra University
60
2 Workshop on “Foundations and Practice of GIS”
19-11-2018 to
22-11-2018
Kasi Viswanatham Ponnapalli Subject Matter Expert IIC
Academy 66
3 Workshop on “Foundations and Practice of GIS”
19-11-2018 to
22-11-2018
Srikanth Ankam Subject Matter Expert IIC Academy
4 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018
Dr. G.L Siva Kumar Babu,
Professor of Civil Engineering,
IISC Bengaluru
78
5 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018 Srinivasa Raju CEO Geomardy Visakhapatnam
6 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018 Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India Chennai
7 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy Professor of Civil Engineering Andhra University
8 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018 Dr. A. Santha Ram Professor ANITS
9 Workshop on “Geotechnical Solutions for Infrastructure Development”
29-12-2018 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Professor & Head, Civil, ANITS
10 Industrial Visit to Thotapalli and Jangavathi Reservoirs Vizianagaram.
22-09-2018 Sri.T.V.Viswa Teja, M.Premchand, M.Nagalakshmi. Assistant Professors, ANITS
62
11 Industrial Visit to Polavaram Irrigation Project. West Godavari
19-02-2019 Sri. T.Kiran Kumar, P.Vandana Rao, M.Premchand. Assistant Professors, ANITS
57
85
Tables B 4.6.1b Events Organized
CAYm1 2017 – 18
S. No
Event Schedule Resource person with designation
No. of Students
1 Guest Lecture on Importance of Geological Investigations
15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines
86
2
Model presentation competition in civil engineering on the occasion of 50th Engineers day
15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist (Retd.) Indian Bureau of Mines
12
3
Essay writing and Elocution competition on “Role of engineers in a developing India” on the occasion of 50th Engineers day
15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.), Indian Bureau of Mines
10
4 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust
53
5 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. V Venkateswara Rao (Retd), Andhra University
53
6 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam
53
7 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University
46
8 One-day workshop on ‘Geotechnical Problems and Practises’
11-10-2017 Prof. B N D Narasinga Rao, ANITS(A)
46
9 Guest Lecture on Air Pollution sources and Control options
24-10-2017
Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam
57
10 Two-day workshop on ‘E-Tabs’
13-12-2017 to
14-12-2017
I. Prakash, Data Pro,
Visakhapatnam 67
11
Inaugural Lecture on Geotechnics for tunnel alignment, VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium
16-02-2018
Dr. A.Santharam, Senior Mining
Geologist (Rtd.), Indian Bureau of
Mines 122
12
Valedictory address on Polavaram Irrigation Project, VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium
17-02-2018
Er.M.T.Raju , Chief Engineer, North
coastal districts, Water resources
deparment 252
86
S. No
Event Schedule Resource person with designation
No. of Students
13 VINIRMITHI’18, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium
16-02-2018 and 17-02-
2018
Students from ANITS and 10 other Engineering Colleges participated in Paper presentation Contest and other technical and co-curricular events
252
14 Campus Recruitment
Summer Training
17-04-2017 to
28-04-2017 In-house Training 50
15 Campus Recruitment
Summer Training
21-06-2017 to
24-06-2017 In-house Training 50
16 Company specific Training 16-08-2017
to 24-08-2017
In-house Training 50
17 Company specific Training 05-09-2017
to 19-09-2017
In-house Training 50
Tables B 4.6.1b Events Organized
CAYm2 2016-17
S. No Action taken Schedule
Resource person with designation
No of Students
1 ASCE ANITS Students Chapter Inaugural Lecture on Emerging trends in civil engineering
01-10-2016 Dr. SivakumarBabu, Professor, Civil Engg., I.I.Sc., Bangalore
100
2
Inauguration Lecture of ANITS IE(I) Students Chapter on Planning and Construction of New Capital of Andhra Pradesh
09-07-2016
Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, Capital Region Development Authority, Amaravathi
128
3 Dr. K.L.Rao memorial Lecture on Major Irrigation Projects and Interlinking of Rivers
15-07-2016
Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam
84
4 Seminar on Career Awareness for Engineering Graduates
18-07-2016 Mohamed Abdullah, Director of Conduira Education and Service Ltd
100
5 Wide Open workshop on Speed maths (WOWS)
23-07-2016 to 24-07-
2016
Focus Academy for Career Enhancement (FACE)
100
6
Industrial Visit to Water and Sewage Treatment Plants at Narava and Town kotha road, Visakhapatnam
05-08-2016
Sri. M.K.S.S.K. Chaitanya, V Leela Manusha, Sri.Ch Vineel, Assistant Professors, ANITS
60
7 Seminar on Higher Studies in US (MBA & MS)
15-09-2016 International Knowledge Center
100
87
S. No Action taken Schedule
Resource person with designation
No of Students
8
Inaugural Lecture on Irrigation Projects of North Coastal districts of A.P., VINIRMITHI’17, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium
14-02-2017
R.Nageswarao, Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources circle, Visahapatnam
136
9 VINIRMITHI’17, Third National Level Students Technical Symposium
14-02-2017 to
15-02-2017
Students from ANITS and 10 other Engineering Colleges participated in Paper presentation Contest and other technical and co-curricular events
136
10 Campus Recruitment Summer
Training
18-04-2016 to
29-04-2016 In-house Training 50
11 Company specific Training 26-08-2016
to 28-08-2016
In-house Training 50
12 Company specific Training 13-09-2016
to 19-09-2016
In-house Training 50
4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. (5) (The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors, publishers, etc.)
Table B 4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines etc.
CAY 2018 - 19
Magazine/Newsletter Name Contribution
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao Professor & Head
Chief Editor
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao Professor & Head
Article on “Smart Cities: STAR Community Rating System”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
J.Vikranth Associate Professor
Article on “ Non Destructive
Testing of Concrete”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
T.Kiran Kumar Assistant Professor
Article on “ Innovation in Transportation Engineering”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Ch.Vineel Assistant Professor
Article on “ Ground Improvement techniques for curbing Liquefaction in Related problems”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
T.V.Viswa Teja Assistant Professor
Article on “ Gabion-properties , types, Applications & Advantages”
88
Magazine/Newsletter Name Contribution
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
P.Vandana Rao Assistant Professor
Article on “ Building Integrated Photovoltaics(BIPV) ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
M.Premchand Assistant Professor
Article on “ Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Ch.Srinivas Assistant Professor
Article on “ Green Buildings ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
M.Nagalakshmi Assistant Professor
Article on “ Eco friendly Non Plastic Disposables ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
P.V.R.K.Reddy Assistant Professor
Article on “ Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis- The only option for Irregular structures ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
K.Swaroop III/IV Civil student
Article on “ Application of Internet of things (IOT) in Civil Engineering Construction ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
A.Vaghna IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Soil Trapping tree ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Ch.Rahul Reddy IV/IV Civil student S.Shanmukha Rao IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Urban Municipal Waste Management ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
G.Raj Kumar IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ The Jeddah Tower ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
G.Gowri Prasad IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Eco-Black Brick ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
S. Jagadeesh Prasad IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Why Can’t We Reuse ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
G.Omkar Ganti IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Brooklyn Bridge ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
R.L.N. Harish IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ The Future of Transportation Engineering ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Ch.Soundarya IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Soil Nailing ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
Ch.Raghu ram IV/IV Civil student Ch.Srinivasa Rao IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ Prefabricated Vertical Drains ”
Civil Engineering News letter, September 2018
N.Yesupadam IV/IV Civil student M.Yaswanth Krishna IV/IV Civil student
Article on “ 100 percent Fly Ash Concrete ”
89
Table B 4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines etc.
CAYm1 2017-18
Magazine/Newsletter Name Contribution
Echoes College Magazine, 2018
Mr. K.Suryanarayana Assistant Professor
Editorial Board Member
Echoes College Magazine, 2018
N.Mounika III/IV Civil student
Editorial Board Member Article on “Sophia-Humaniod”
Echoes College Magazine, 2018
A.Vaghna III/IV Civil student
Editorial Board Member Article on “Murder at dawn”
Echoes College Magazine, 2018
Mr.T.V.Viswateja Assistant Professor
Article on “SWOC/SWOT analysis”
Echoes College Magazine, 2018
Mr. J.Harshavardhana Reddy, Assistant Professor
Article on “Air-Heavy to breath”
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2018
Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao Professor & Head
Chief Editor
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2018
Mr. Ch.Srinivas Assistant Professor
Editorial board member
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2018
K.Manikanta Reddy student
Editorial board member
Table B 4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines etc.
CAYm2 2016-17
Magazine/Newsletter Name Contribution
Echoes College Magazine, 2017
Ms.LeelaMausha Assistant Professor
Editorial Board Member
Echoes College Magazine, 2017
V.Chakradhar IV/IV Civil student
Editorial Board Member
Echoes College Magazine, 2017
P.Durga prasad II/IV Civil student
Article on “Life skills”
Echoes College Magazine, 2017
M.K.Rameez raja II/IV Civil student
Article on “Importance of Civil Engg”
Echoes College Magazine, 2017
T.Pavan kumar (I/IV) I/IV Civil student
Article on “open door policy”
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2017
Dr. B.N.D.Narasinga Rao Professor & Head
Chief Editor
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2017
Mr.T.V.V.Teja Assistant Professor
Editorial board member
Civil Engineering News letter, March 2017
V. Satya Chakradhar student
Editorial board member
90
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study (10)
(The Department shall provide a table indicating those publications, which received awards in
the events/conferences organized by other institutes.)
Table 4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students
CAY 2018-19
S. No
Name of the student
Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation
Dates of the event
Prizes won
1 R.Manikumar III/IV Civil
Concrete Challange I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
2 M.Manohar III/IV Civil
Concrete Challange I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
3 K.S. Vinay Srinivas III/IV Civil
Concrete Challange I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
4 M.Eswara vara Prasad III/IV Civil
Concrete Challange I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
5 M.Manohar III/IV Civil
Geo Genius I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
6 K.S. Vinay Srinivas III/IV Civil
Geo Genius I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
1st Prize
7 M.Eswara vara Prasad III/IV Civil
Geo Genius I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
2nd Prize
8 T.Pavan Kumar III/IV Civil
Geo Genius I.I.T Madras 08-03-2019
to 10-03-2019
2nd Prize
9 B.Vinay Kumar III/IV Civil
Smart City Challenge I.I.T Bhubaneswar 01-02-2019
to 03-02-2019
1st Prize
Table 4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students
CAYm1 2017-18
Type of event: Co-curricular
S. No
Name of the student
Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation
Dates of the event
Prizes won
1 T.Sai kumar III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (Shastra)
I.I.T. Madras 05-01-2018 Consola
tion
2 T.Sai kumar III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (ASPIRE2K18)
Aditya College of Engineering, Tekkali
23-02-2018 1st Prize
3 T.Sai kumar III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (CHAKRAVYUH2K18)
Raghu College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam
03-03-2018 2nd Prize
4 J.Vamsikrishna III/IV, Civil
Quiz Competition (SOUDHA2K18)
J.N.T.U.Kakinada 24-02-2018 1st Prize
91
S. No
Name of the student
Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation
Dates of the event
Prizes won
5 S.Jagadeesh III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (Sahastra)
I.I.T.Madras 05-01-2018 Consola
tion
6 B.Vineeth III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (Sahastra)
I.I.T.Madras 05-01-2018 Consola
tion
7 B.Gnana Sagar III/IV, Civil
Quiz Competition (SOUDHA2K18)
J.N.T.U.Kakinada 24-02-2018 1st Prize
8 Ch.Raguram III/IV, Civil
Quiz Competition (SOUDHA2K18)
J.N.T.U.Kakinada 24-02-2018 1st Prize
9 K.BindhuBargavi III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (SATHAKARYAN)
GVP College of Engineering
30-12-2017 2nd Prize
10 D.Manikumari III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (SATHAKARYAN)
GVP College of Engineering
30-12-2017 2nd Prize
11 A.Vaghna III/IV, Civil
Paper presentation (SATHAKARYAN)
GVP College of Engineering
30-12-2017 2nd Prize
Type of event: Extra-curricular
S. No
Name of the student
Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation
Dates of the event
Prizes won
12 G.Sai lakshmi IV/IV, Civil
Table Tennis (Women)
AUCE(A) 12-09-2017 to 13-09-2017
1st Prize
13 S.Shanmukharao III/IV civil
Chess Championship AU inter collegiate 12-09-2017 to 13-09-2017
1st Prize
Table 4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students
CAYm2 2016-17
Type of event: Co-curricular
S. No
Name of the student
Name of the Activity Name of the Organisation
Dates of the event
Prizes won
1 D.Joy S.Sarvani
Tech Expo Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp
March 17-18, 2017
1st prize
2 R.Manasa G.Neeharika
Paper Presentation Contest
Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp
March 17-18, 2017
3rd prize
3
B. Sumalatha M.Manasa D.Joy S.Sarvani R.Manasa
Treasure Hunt Vignan Institute of Technology, Vskp
March 17-18, 2017
2nd Prize
4 N.Mounika, A.Vaghna
Paper Presentation Contest
J.N.T.U.Kakinada March 9-10,
2017 2nd prize
5 J.Swetha Just A Minute S.R.K.R College of
Engineering
January 5-6, 2017
1st Prize
6 M.Dhana lakshmi Quiz S.R.K.R College of
Engineering
January 5-6, 2017
1st Prize
92
Type of event: Extra-curricular
S.
No
Name of the
student Name of the Activity
Name of the
Organisation
Dates of the
event
Prizes
won
7 G.Sai lakshmi
III/IV, Civil
Table Tennis
(Women)
AUCE(A) Sep, 2016 1st Prize
8
B. Sumalatha
M.Manasa
S.Sarvani
S.Bhavani
Tech Expo Mech UTSAV Tech
Fest,
GITAM,
Viisakhapatnam
December
30-31, 2016
1st Prize
93
CRITERION 5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200
Details for the faculty of the Department for all academic years to be provided in Table B.5 Details for the faculty of the department, cumulative information for all academic years starting from current year in above format in Annexure - 12.
5.1. Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20) (To be calculated at Department Level)
No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): _____1_____ No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): _____1_____ No. of Students in UG 2nd Year= u1 No. of Students in UG 3rd Year= u2 No. of Students in UG 4th Year= u3 No. of Students in PG 1st Year= p1 No. of Students in PG 2nd Year= p2 No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry student (The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department) S=Number of Students in the Department = U1 + U2 + U3 + P1 + P2 F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Student Teacher Ratio (STR) = S/F
Table B.5.1
Year CAY
(2018-19) CAYm1
(2017-18) CAYm2
(2016-17)
u1 73 68 72
u2 66 71 73
u3 70 71 65
p1 4 2 -
Total No. of Students in the Department (S) 215 212 210
No. of Faculty in the Department (F) 16 16 14
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) 13.44 13.25 15
Average SFR 13.90
* M. Tech. (Soil Mechanics) commenced w.e.f. CAYm1 2017-18 Marks Obtained: 20 Note: Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR between 15:1 to 25:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 25:1. Marks distribution is given as below: < = 15 - 20 Marks
94
< = 17 - 18 Marks < = 19 - 16 Marks < = 21 - 14 Marks < = 23 - 12 Marks < = 25 - 10 Marks > 25.0 - 0 Marks
Minimum 75% should be Regular/ full time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual Faculty as per AICTE norms and standards.
The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of visiting/adjunct faculty, whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive semesters in the corresponding academic year on full time basis shall be considered for the purpose of calculation in the Student Faculty Ratio.
5.1.1. Provide the information about the regular and contractual faculty as per the format mentioned below:
Table B 5.1.1
Total number of regular faculty in the department
Total number of contractual (Adjunct) faculty in the department
CAY (2018-19) 14 2
CAYm1 (2017-18) 14 2
CAYm2 (2016-17) 12 2
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25) The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3) F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per 5.1
Table B 5.2
Year
Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Required F1
Available Required F2
Available Required F3
Available
CAY 2018-19
2(1.2) 3 3(2.4) 0 7(7.1) 13
CAYm1 2017-18
2(1.2) 3 2(2.4) 0 7(7.3) 13
CAYm2 2016-17
2(1.2) 3 2(2.3) 0 7 (6.99) 11
Average Numbers
RF1=2
AF1=3
RF2=2.33
AF2=0
RF3=7.00
AF3=12.33
95
5.124.06.03
3
2
2
1
1
RF
AF
RF
AF
RF
AFMarksRatioCadre
Cadre Ratio Marks = 3.00 + 0.00 x 0.6 + 12.33 x 0.4 x 12.5
2.00 2.33 7.00
= 27.5
Marks obtained = 27.5
If AF1 = AF2 = 0 then zero marks
Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25 Example:Intake = 60 (i.e, total no of students = 180); Required number of Faculty:9; RF1=1, RF2=2
and RF3=6
Case1: AF1/RF1 = 1; AF2/RF2 = 1; AF3/RF3 = 1; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.6+0.4) x 12.5 = 25
Case2: AF1/RF1 = 1; AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 5/6; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x 12.5 = limited to 25
Case3: AF1/RF1 = 0; AF2/RF2 = 1/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/6; Cadre proportion marks = (0+0.3+0.53) x 12.5 = 10.4 5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)
FQ = 2.5 x [(10X+4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with M. Tech,
F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 20:1 Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and no. of students
required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
Table B.5.3
Years X Y F FQ = 2.5 x [(10X+4Y)/F)]
CAY 2018-19
1 13 11 14.09
CAYm1 2017-18
1 13 11 14.09
CAYm2 2016-17
1 11 11 12.27
Average Assessment 13.48
Marks obtained = 13.48
96
5.4 Faculty Retention (25)
Table B 5.4 No. of regular faculty members
Number of required regular faculty in CAYm3 (2015-16) = 9
S.No. Year No. of required
regular
faculty members
retained*
% of required
regular
faculty members
retained*
Marks
1 CAY (2018-19) 8 88.9 20
2 CAYm1 (2017-18) 8 88.9 20
3 CAYm2 (2016-17) 8 88.9 20
* keeping CAYm3 as the base year
Table B.5.4
Item (% of faculty retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm3 as base year)
Marks
>=90% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year
25
>=75% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year
20
>=60% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year
15
>=50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year
10
<50% of required Faculty members retained during the period of three academic years keeping CAYm3 as base year
0
Annexure-12 shows details of faculty during CAYm3
5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20) Innovations by the Faculty in teaching and learning shall be summarized as per the following description.
Contributions to teaching and learning are activities that contribute to the improvement of student learning. These activities may include innovations not limited to, use of ICT, instruction delivery, instructional methods, assessment, evaluation and inclusive class rooms that lead to effective, efficient and engaging instruction. Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the following criteria:
The work must be made available on Institute website
The work must be available for peer review and critique
The work must be reproducible and developed further by other scholars
The department/institution may set up appropriate processes for making the contributions available to the public, getting them reviewed and for rewarding. These may typically include statement of clear goals, adequate preparation, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective presentation and reflective critique
Fig. B 5.5 illustrates the Innovations by the Faculty in teaching – learning, and they are explained below
97
1) Use of Teaching-Learning techniques
Incorporating the maxims of teaching such as known to unknown, whole to part, concrete to
abstract etc., into T-L process as much as possible to make it more effective
Adopting to different learning styles of students such as verbal, visual, kinaesthetic, interpersonal
etc., while planning the T-L process as much as possible
Activity based learning such as group task, student seminar etc.
Assigning a topic to the group of students and guiding them to give presentations.
Fig. B 5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning
2) Use of e-resources and ICT
Providing quick access to the Instructional material, PPTs, Question Bank etc., by hosting them on
MOODLE platform on Department website to help students to learn the concepts at their
convenient time.
Conducting online Quiz on MOODLES through Institution website.
Motivating the students for using Internet facility available in the department for deeper inquiry into the subjects.
98
3) Mentoring students with backlogs
Mentoring students with backlogs by concerned subject faculty before supplementary
examinations
Encouraging Peer teaching to enable students to attain self learning skills.
4) Encouraging Advanced learners
Encouraging the students to give presentations on recent advances in civil engineering, related to
the concerned subject.
Conducting special classes to IV year students in GATE
Conducting Mock GATE examinations to IV year students
Conducting Campus Recruitment Training during Summer after III year to enhance employability
skills
Conducting Company specific training before campus placements in IV Year
5) Action on Curricular gaps
Organizing workshops/training programs on E-Tabs, RSGIS Software, STAAD Pro. etc., to make
them industry ready.
Organizing FDPs/Workshops to faculty on Arc GIS and Sponsoring faculty for FDPs/Workshops at
higher learning Institutes, which will indirectly benefit the students in the T-L process
6) Covering Topics beyond curriculum
Faculty seminars on topics beyond curriculum in each course in regular class work.
Organizing student seminars on topics beyond curriculum.
Demonstration of advanced topics beyond curriculum by referring research journals and NPTEL
materials
7) To help students monitor and reinforce their learning
Conducting class tests from a previously circulated Question bank.
Guiding the students to solve previous GATE problems.
Demonstration of advanced topics beyond curriculum by referring research journals and NPTEL
materials
5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 Points Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points
Table B.5.6
Faculty participation in FDPs/STTPs
Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per Faculty
CAY (2018-19)
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
Dr. B N D Narasinga Rao 5 5
J. Vikranth 3
M K S S K Chaitanya 3
T Kiran Kumar
99
Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per Faculty
CAY (2018-19)
CAYm1 (2017-18)
CAYm2 (2016-17)
P V R Sravya
Ch Vineel 5 3
T V Viswa Teja 5 5
B Ramana Raja 5
V.Leela Manusha 5
D.Sindhuja 5
A.Vamsi Krishna 5
P.Vandana Rao 5 3 3
M. Premchand 3 5
Ch. Srinivas 3 5
J. Harsha Vardhana Reddy 5 3
K. Suryanarayana 3 3
M. Nagalakshmi 5
P.V.R.K. Reddy 3
Sum 38 29 36
RF= Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio as per 5.1
11 13 12
Assessment = 3 × (Sum/0.5RF) (Marks limited to 15)
15 13.38 15
Average assessment over three years (Marks limited to 15)
14.46
5.7. Research and Development (30) 5.7.1. Academic Research (10) Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving Ph.D. during the assessment period.
Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4)
All relevant details shall be mentioned.
Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book Chapters etc.
1) Text Book: B.N.D.Narasinga Rao (single author), Text Book on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Wiley India, First Indian Edition 2015, pages 1089, ISBN: 978-81-265-3956-7. The book is prescribed by more than 10 universities and autonomous colleges.
100
2) Number of faculty publications in Journals is summarized in Table B 5.7.1a
List of Faculty Publications enclosed as Annexure-13
Table B 5.7.1a
Faculty publications in Journals Name of Faculty contributing
to Research Publication
CAY
(2018-19)
CAYm1
(2017-18)
CAYm2
(2016-17)
Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao 1 1 2
Mr. J. Vikranth - 2 1
Mr. M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya 2 1 1
Mr. T. Kiran Kumar - 1 1
Mrs. P.V.R. Sravya 3 1 3
Mr. Ch. Vineel 1 2 -
Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja 2 1 -
Mrs. P. Vandana Rao 1 1 1
Mr. M.Premchand 1 1 -
Mr. Ch. Srinivas 2 2 -
Mr. K. Suryanarayana - 1 -
Mr. J. Harha Vardhana Reddy 1 1 -
Ms. M. Nagalakshmi - 1 -
Mr. P.V.R.K. Reddy 1 - -
Total 15 16 09
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute Details of faculty pursuing Ph.D. are given in Table B 5.7.1b
Table B 5.7.1b
S. No
Name of the Faculty Date of registering for Ph.D.
Name of Guide University Work Completed
(%)
Expected year of
completion
1 J.Vikranth 11-08-2008 Dr.K.Rambabu Andhra
University 100 2019
2 M.K.S.S.Krishna Chaitanya
07-01-2014 Prof.K.Srinivasa Rao
Andhra University
60 2020
3 T.Kiran Kumar 17-04-2018 Prof.K.Durga Rani Andhra
University 10 2023
4 P.Vandana Rao 18-05-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy
Andhra University
10 2023
5 K.Suryanarayana 17-04-2018 Dr.K.Rambabu Andhra
University 10 2023
6 Ch. Srinivas 04-02-2019 Dr. G. Yesuratnam
JNTUK, Kakinada
0 2025
101
5.7.2. Sponsored Research (5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Name of the Faculty Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao
Project Title Wealth from Waste: Fly ash characterization for its bulk utilization in Geotechnical Engineering Applications
Duration 2 Years
Agency UGC
Date of Sanction 30-06-2017
Amount (Rs.) 3,10,000
Funding amount (Cumulative during assessment years):
Amount >20Lacs–5Marks
Amount>=16Lacsand<=20lacs-4Marks
Amount>=12Lacsand<16lacs–3Marks Amount>=8Lacsand<12lacs–2Marks
Amount>=4Lacsand<8lacs–1Mark
Amount<4Lacs–0Mark
5.7.3. Development activities (10)
Detailed Instructional Material in accordance with the syllabus is made available on the institute website.
Working Models and charts are developed for better understanding of the students.
5.7.4. Consultancy (from Industry) (5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Total Value of Consultancy Projects: Rs.10,77 ,997
CAYm1 (2017-2018)
Name of the Faculty Project Title Details
Duration Agency Amount (Rs.)
Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao
Geotechnical investigations for Waste to Energy Power plant at Kapuluppada Municipal dump site
Oct-Dec
2017
M/s Jindal Urban Waste Management (Visakha) Limited
9,01,222
Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao
Construction of G + 2 Building at Thagarapuvalasa
March 2018
PM Jacob 4,600
102
CAYm2 (2016-2017)
Name of the Faculty Project Title Details Duration Agency Amount
(Rs.)
Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao
Geotechnical Investigations for Waste to Energy Plant at
Kappuluppada, Visakhapatnam
October-November
2016
M/s Jindal Urban Waste
Management (Visakha) Limited
1,64,675
J. Vikranth Construction of Library, Near e-seva Visakhapatnam
Sep 2016 GVMC 7500
CAYm3 (2015-16)
NIL
Funding amount (Cumulative during CAYm1,CAYm2 & CAYm3)
Amount>10Lacs–5Marks
Amount>=8Lacs and<=10lacs–4Marks
Amount>=6Lacsand<8lacs–3Marks
Amount>=4Lacsand<6lacs–2Marks
Amount>=2Lacsand<4lacs–1Mark
Amount<2Lacs–0Mark
Marks Obtained = 5 M
5.8 Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development Systems (FPADS)(30)
Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions have to perform a variety of tasks pertaining to diverse
roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct research for their sel f-
renewal, keep a breast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for effective implementation of curricula. They are also expected to provide services to the industry and community for understanding and
contributing to the solution of real life problems in industry. Another role relates to the shouldering of
administrative responsibilities and co-operation with other Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head
of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system for Faculty is vital for optimizi ng the contribution of
individual faculty to institutional performance.
The assessment is based on:
A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years (10)
ANITS has well defined Performance Appraisal system which was revised and improved as per UGC norms.
The Pro-forma and guidelines for Performance Appraisal (June 2016 version) are given in Annexure -14.
103
Performance Appraisal System @ ANITS Minimum Academic Performance Indicators (API’s) to be attained by the faculty for each of the categories
based on the cadre
S No
Category Maximum API score
Minimum API*
Assistant Professor < 3 year
experience
Assistant Professor
more than 3 year
experience
Associate Professor
Professor
1 Teaching, Learning And
Evaluation Related Activities
100 60 60 60 60
2
Co-Curricular, Extension And Professional
Development Related Activities.
40 20 20 20 20
3 Research And
Academic Contributions
** 10 20 30 35
*For awarding annual increment the faculty has to score the minimum points in each of the categories as
mentioned in the table above.
** There is no upper limit for the maximum API score for 3rd category.
S. No.
Indicators / Activities Max. Score
1 TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION RELATED ACTIVITIES
1.1
Lectures, Seminars, tutorials, practicals, project: Minimum lecture hours --Professor: 12 hours/week ; Associate Prof: 14 Hours /week ; Asst. Prof: 16 Hrs/Week Score proportional to workload and average of two semesters. Two seminar / project hours is to be considered as one Lecture hour only.
20
1.2 Feedback on the Courses taught Feedback score proportional to percentage of feedback marks –average of two semesters of two or more subjects.
25
1.3
Pass percentage : Pass percentage in the subjects taught during the previous year. Score proportional to pass percentage upto 60%. Below 60% score is nil. To be calculated as average of two semesters.
25
1.4 Preparation of study material / resources with proof for all courses he/she teaches and complete assessment and attainment of outcomes
10
1.5
Innovative / student centric teaching-learning methods Use of ICT based Teaching material/Interactive sessions/Participatory learning modules/Remedial classes/Bridge courses. Teaching beyond curriculum with clear details of topics and its usefulness to the students
10
1.6 Curriculum preparation and Examination related work Curriculum preparation: coordinator-10 points, member -5 points College/University End semester examination work: 5 points
10
104
S. No.
Indicators / Activities Max. Score
Total 100
2
CO-CURRICULAR, EXTENSION OR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
2.1
Co-curricular activities Subject related events: Lectures on special topics; Quiz/debate/ elocution; study tour; Exhibition; Department Association; Guiding students in inter-institute events; Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training; Any other activity for student development Extension Activities Institute-Industry interaction; Training industry persons, offering special courses
5
2.2
Professional Development activities in the campus Participation in Seminar/workshop/symposia (2 marks); conferences (2); FDPs (5); STTPs (5); Lectures/Talks delivered in programs (2); Membership of Associations- (3); Publication of general articles (2); General awareness activity (2) Community work such as National integration, secularism, democracy, humanism, peace, scientific temper, flood or drought relief etc. (max.5)
10
2.3
Department Administration Members of committees like Admissions; discipline; Anti-ragging; laboratory equipment procurement, utilization, maintenance and safety; any other role assigned by Principal/HoD (5) NAAC/NBA/Autonomous/BOS etc., coordinator (10); member(5) with 100% compliance
15
2.4
Mentoring to help the students at individual level (a)Guidance in course work specific/ laboratory specific/all-round development (5 marks) The faculty member shall report the details of counselling/ mentoring the students for various purposes such as i) Academics ii) Co-curricular activities iii) Extra-curricular activities iv) discipline & regularity v) self-learning vi) grievance redressal (b)Career Guidance, Training, Placement, Entrepreneurship (5) Contribution of faculty member for career guidance, subject coaching, Special classes for GATE, mock tests, communication skills.
10
Total 40
3 Research and Academic Contributions -
3.1
Research Papers published: Referred journals: Score per paper 15 if Imp. Fac.<1; 25 if I.F. 1to2; 30 if I.F.2 to 5; 40 if I.F. 5 to 10 ( with citation 25) Non-refereed but recognized and reputable journals and periodicals with ISBN/ISSN: 10/paper Conference proceedings as full paper: 10/paper (Note: First or Second Author 100% score; Third and above 50% )
3.2 Publications (Books, chapters in books other than journal)
Text books: 50/ author; 10/chapter in an edited book.
3.3
Research Projects Completed/Ongoing Sponsored Projects. (In case of Principal / CO investigator points are to be shared in 70:30 ratio). Grant >Rs. 30 Lakhs (40 per Project). Grant > Rs.5 Lakhs (30 per Project). Grants > Rs. 50,000 (20 per Project).
105
S. No.
Indicators / Activities Max. Score
3.4
Research Guidance (In case of joint supervision points are to be shared in 70: 30 ratio) M. Phil. / M Tech (Degree awarded only) (5 per candidate). Ph. D. (Degree awarded only) (20 per candidate). Ph. D. Guidance (5M) Thesis submitted (10 per candidate).
3.5
Consultancy Provide a list of Consultancy works with amount accrued Consultancy amount: Amount > 0.5 Lac – 20 points Amount < 0.5 Lac –10 points
3.6
Participation or Presentation in Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop
i. Participation in Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop: 2 week-20/each; 1 week-10/each; 2-4 days – 5/each
ii. **Participation and Presentation of research papers (oral/poster) in Conferences/ Seminars/ workshops etc. International conference (10/activity); National (7.5/activity); Regional/State level (5/activity); Local - University/college level (3 /activity)
iii. Invited lectures or presentations for conferences/ Seminar/ Training Course/Refresher Course/Orientation Course: International Level (10 per lecture); National Level (5 per lecture); Regional Level (3 per lecture); Local- University/College Level (2 per lecture)
3.7
Training Courses / Conference /Seminar/Workshop Organised Programme: 2 weeks or more: 30 points; 1 week: 20points ;< 1 week : 10points. In case of Co-convener/Jt. Organizing Secretary points are to be shared in 70: 30 ratio:
3.8
Award/ Honours /Recognitions International level honour/recognition/award (30 per award) National level honour/recognition/award (25 per award) State level honour/recognition/award (20 per award)
** If a paper is presented in conference / seminar is published in the form of proceedings , the points would accrue for 3.1 but not for 3.6 (ii).
Its implementation and effectiveness (20) 20M
The pro forma for Performance Appraisal (See Annexure-14) is circulated to the faculty members, who will
fill up the same and enclose required annexures as proof. HoD reviews the filled-in pro forma submitted by
the faculty member and awards his/her evaluation marks. The Appraisal form is then reviewed by Principal and submitted to the Management for award of Annual increment based on the performance.
Marks Obtained = 30M
5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment years:
Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1)
Minimum 50 hours per year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc.
(Minimum 50 hours interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks)
Details of contribution of adjunct faculty in teaching and learning is given in Table B 5.9
106
Table B 5.9
S.
No. Name of Faculty Year & Semester Subject Handled
No. of hours
CAY
(2018-19)
CAYm1
(2017-18)
CAYm2
(2016-17)
1 A.Santha Ram M.Tech Ist year Ist
Semester
Numerical Methods 52 - -
2 Dr.V.Venkateshwara Rao IInd Year & Ist
Semester
Engineering Geology - - 74
3 Prof. A. Ramamohana Rao IInd Year & Ist
Semester
Surveying- I 78 73 76
Surveying Field Work - I 42 48 48
IInd Year & IInd
Semester
Fluid Mechanics - I 91 81 96
Fluid Mechanics Lab - I 48 33 39
IIIrd Year & Ist
Semester
Fluid Mechanics Lab - II 42 51 -
IVth Year & Ist
Semester
Fluid Mechanics Lab - II - - 42
Total No of hours 353 286 375
Marks Obtained: 1+9=10
107
CRITERION 6 Facilities and Technical Support 80
6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)
6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)
S. No
Name of the Laboratory
Number of
students per batch
Name of the important equipment
Weekly utilization status (all the courses for which the lab is
utilized)
Technical manpower support
Name of the technical staff
Designation Qualification
1 Surveying Lab 3 1) Total Station; 2) Auto Level; 3) Dumpy Level; 4) Theodolite
I Semester (50%) 1. II/IV Surveying Field work-I (2)* 2. IV/IV Project work(3)
N.Simhachalam Lab Technician
ITI (Fitter)
II Semester (50%) 1. II/IV Surveying Field Work- II (2) 2. IV/IV Project Work(3)
2 Geotechnical Engineering Lab
3 1) Tri axial cell; 2) Direct Shear Apparatus; 3) Consolidation equipment; 4) CBR Testing apparatus; 5) Relative density testing apparatus;
I Semester (50%) 1) III/IV- Geotechnical Engineering
Lab-I(2) 2) IV-I-Project Work(3)
N.Ganeshwara Rao
Lab Technician
ITI (Fitter)
II Semester (50%) 1. III-II/IV- Geotechnical
Engineering Lab-II(2) 2. IV-II-Project Work(3)
3 Concrete Technology Lab
4 1. Compression Testing Machine,
2. Flexure Testing Machine
3. VeeBee Consistometer 4. Concrete mixer
I Semester (30%) 1. IV-I-Project Work (3)
P. Ram babu Technician ITI (Fitter)
II Semester (70%) 1. II/IV- Concrete Lab(2) 2. II-II/IV- Concrete Lab
(Autonomous)(2) 3. IV-II-Project Work.(3)
108
S. No
Name of the Laboratory
Number of
students per batch
Name of the important equipment
Weekly utilization status (all the courses for which the lab is
utilized)
Technical manpower support
Name of the technical staff
Designation Qualification
4 Transportation Engineering Lab
3 1. Abrasion Testing Machine;
2. Ductility testing machine;
3. Impact testing equipment
I Semester (20%) 1. IV-I/IV Transportation
Engineering Lab(2)
P. Ram babu Technician ITI (Fitter)
5 Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab
1 Total No. of Computers- 45 Licensed Software 1. Staad Pro, 2. ARC GIS
I Semester (50%) 1. III/IV CACE I,(2)
R. Ramesh Programmer DOEACC
II Semester (50%) 2. III /IV CACE-II(2)
6 Project Lab Total No. of Computers- 45 Licensed Software 3. Staad Pro, 4. ARC GIS
I Semester (50%) 1. IV/IV Project work- I,(2)
R. Ramesh Programmer DOEACC
II Semester (50%) 2. IV/IV Project work- II (2)
7 Communication Skills Lab*
2 - II Semester (10%) 2. I /IV English lab (1)
- - -
8 Physics Lab* 4 1.Newton rings apparatus
I Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Physics Lab (1)
P.Teju Aswini Technician MSc (Physics)
9 Chemistry Lab* 1 1.pH meter 2.Titration Equipment (Pippete and Burrete)
II Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Chemistry Lab (1)
D.Suresh Technician BSc Chemistry
10 Workshop* 2 1.Carpentry 2. Tinsmithy
I Semester (10%) 2. I /IV Wrokshop (1)
M.Raja Technician Diploma
109
S. No
Name of the Laboratory
Number of
students per batch
Name of the important equipment
Weekly utilization status (all the courses for which the lab is
utilized)
Technical manpower support
Name of the technical staff
Designation Qualification
11 C Programming Lab*
1 Total No. of Computers- 40 1.C Language Software
I Semester (10%) I /IV C-Programming lab(1)
P.V.Siva kumar Yadav
Programmer BSc (Computers)
12 CAD in Civil Engineering Lab*
1 1.AUTO CAD Software 2.STAAD software 3.C-Programming
I Semester (20%) IV /IV CAD Lab (2)
R.Santosh Kumar
Programmer BSc (Computers) & I.T.I Welder
13 Soft skills Lab* 10 - II Semester (10%) 2. III /IV Soft Skills Lab-(1)
- - -
14 Strength of Materials Lab*
5 1.Universal Testing Machine
I Semester (20%) 2. II /IV SM-Lab-(2)
B.Rama Rao Technician ITI (Fitter)
15 Fluid Mechanics & Hydraulic Machines Lab*
6 1.Rectangular & Trapezoidal notch 2.Pelton wheel and Francis Turbine
II Semester (20%) 2. II /IV FM-Lab-I(2)
D.Srinivas Technician Diploma
I Semester (20%) 2. III /IV FM Lab-II(2)
16 Environmental Engineering Lab*
1 1.BOD Incubator 2.JAR Test
I Semester (50%) III /IV EELab (2) IV/IV Project work- I,(2)
B.V.G.Narayana Senior Technician
BSc (Chemistry)
II Semester (20%) IV/IV Project work- II,(2)
* shared with other Departments Note: Figures in brackets indicates No of slots
110
6.2 Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in laboratories (25)
S. No
Facility Name Details Reason(s) for creating facility
Utilization Areas in which students are expected to have enhanced
Learning
Relevance to
Pos/PSOs
1 Marshall Stability Apparatus
Date: 19-09-2018; Cost: Rs 1,56,852
Company: AIMIL; No’s: 1
To enable students to do Project work
Project work Pavement design 1,2,3/1,2
2
Computer Applications in Civil Engineering Lab-II
Arc GIS Software Date: 03-11-2017; Cost: Rs.
7,38,680 Company: ESRI;
No of Licenses: 41
Providing exposure and hands on experience to
students in RS&GIS
Class work & Project work
Remote Sensing & Geographical Information
System (RS&GIS)
1,2,3,5/1,2,3
3 Project Laboratory
Computer centre with 45 desktop systems, server and UPS is established exclusively for the
Department
To enable students to do Project work
Project work Civil Engineering Projects in all
specializations 1,5/1,2
4 Dynamic cone penetration Test Apparatus
Date: 31-03-2017; Cost:Rs.58,773
Company: AIMIL; No’s: 1
To determining the resistance of different
types of soil strata
Class work & Project work
Geotechnical Engineering 1,3,4,9/
1,2,3
5 Accelerated Curing Tank
Date: 28-11-2016; Cost:Rs.1,34,677
Company: AIMIL; No’s: 1
To reduce curing time of concrete specimens
Class work, Project work and
Research work Concrete Technology 1,4/1,2
6 Needle Vibrator Date: 28-11-16; Cost:Rs. 26,351
Company: AIMIL; No’s: 1
To expose the students to practical construction
methods
Class work, Project work, & Research work
Concrete Technology 1,5/1,2
111
6.3 Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)
(Self-Explanatory) To ensure high quality technical education to the students, the college provides best possible
infrastructure facilities in the campus. The college is located in serene atmosphere, in an area covering 12
acres and has a built-up area of over 3.00 lakh sq.ft of RCC Buildings. All laboratories are spacious, well
ventilated and provided with adequate electrical fittings to take care of ambiance.
Electricity, power backup, telecom facility, drinking water, and security
Electricity, Power backup: Electrical power is supplied to ANITS through a 11 K.V 3 - phase feeder from
A.P. Transco. The supply is received in 11 K.V/415V substation located inside the campus. ANITS has
20KVA, 125 KVA and 250 KVA standby diesel generators to support incase the A.P. Transco supply fails.
This is more than 100% backup. These generators supply power to all departments, administrative block,
library and the girls’ hostel.
Water supply: There are 5 bore wells in ANITS campus with adequate yield to fully meet the water
requirement for drinking, laboratory use and other purposes. An RO Plant (Mineral Water Plant) with a
capacity of 1000 Liters per hour for drinking is also established. It supplies drinking water to all the
departments and the Boys’ & Girls’ hostels through water coolers.
Telecom: At present, ANITS has 8 telephone lines, and an expandable EPABX with 180 lines to connect all
Departments and a FAX.
(a) Academic Building Maintenance:
Estate Supervisor – looks after maintenance of buildings and green covers.
(b) Laboratory Equipment Maintenance:
All the equipment in the laboratories is maintained on a regular basis by the concerned laboratory
technicians under the guidance and supervision of the laboratory in charge (Faculty members) . General
servicing is done during summer vacation before commencement of academic year. Servicing is also done
whenever necessary. Calibration is being done to the equipment whenever needed. AMC is in practice
wherever necessary.
An equipment maintenance register is maintained separately for each laboratory to record the
maintenance, repairs and servicing if any carried out for the equipment.
(i) For Computers: Routine complaints are looked after by an internal team of programmers and
technicians
(ii) For large & expensive equipment: Malfunctioning of equipment is referred to the supplier of the
equipment for necessary servicing and repairs
(c) Ambience, green cover, water harvesting, environment preservation etc.
Ambience has been given special importance for the students to feel refreshed when they enter
the Campus.
Green lawn was developed and trees grown in the campus for good ambience and greenery
Water harvesting provided at three different locations such that all the rain water is harvested.
To add to protection of environment and to reduce the load on conventional electrical energy,
solar heaters had been arranged in the Girls’ Hostel and we are planning to expand to other
buildings gradually.
112
6.4. Project laboratory (5) (Mention facilities & Utilization)
Facilities:
1) Computer Centre: - Computer center is equipped with 45 systems with internet facility and the
following licensed software are available
a) Staad. Pro
b) Staad foundation
c) Auto CAD
d) ARC GIS
e) ABACUS(Student Version)
f) VISSIM(Student Version)
Utilization:
1. Utilization of the project lab is monitored through a log register
2. Students use computer center for i) working on STAAD Pro, Arc GIS and other software for
their project work and also for ii) literature survey for the purpose of project works
3. Percentage utilization of lab is 56.9 i.e., 41nos of students out of 72nos students
2) The Geotechnical Engineering laboratory, Concrete Technology laboratory and Transportation
Engineering laboratory, Environmental Engineering laboratory and to some extent survey lab are also used
by students for their Project work.
6.5. Safety measures in laboratories (10)
1. Common safety measures
Following are the common safety measures adopted in all laboratories:
1) Operating instructions are displayed for all equipment
2) Students carry out the experiments only under the supervision of the faculty members and lab
technicians.
3) First aid box is available in case of unexpected events
4) The lab technicians are provided with training on how to use Fire extinguishers
In addition to the above, the safety measures are followed in individual laboratories are listed in Table 6.5
Table 6.5 Safety Measures in Laboratories.
S. No.
Name of the Laboratory Safety measures
1 Surveying Field Work 1. All the students should wear Caps, shoes, uniform &
apron
2 Geotechnical Engineering 1. All the students should wear uniform, aprons and shoes 2. Students are instructed in operating the equipment
safely
3 Concrete Technology 1. All the students should wear Aprons and Safety Shoes. 2. The lab is equipped with fire extinguisher. 3. MCB’s are provided for all equipments.
4 Environmental Engineering 1. All the students should wear Hand gloves, Aprons and
Safety Shoes.
2.
113
S. No.
Name of the Laboratory Safety measures
5 Transportation Engineering 1. All the students should wear Aprons and Safety Shoes. 2. The lab is equipped with fire extinguisher. 3. MCB’s are provided for all equipments.
6 Computer Application in Civil Engineering
1. UPS which supports 40 systems is provided in computer lab.
2. Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and earthing
1. ANITS receives electric power from EPDCL through 3 phase 11 K.V. feeders. It is distributed at
440V, 3ø, using overhead lines and underground cables.
2. All overhead structures are earthed. All the panel boards are double earthed.
3. The earth points are tested once in 3 months and necessary maintenance is done. Rubber mats are
laid in front of all panel boards.
4. The electrical safety of all installations in the college is checked every year by the Dy. Electrical
Inspector of Govt. of A.P.
3. Fire-fighting arrangements:
Effective safety arrangements with emergency / multiple exist have been made and Fire -extinguishers
installed at all the laboratories, Class Rooms, Auditorium and seminars halls.
4. Safety of civil structure
All the buildings constructed at ANITS campus is followed as per the design requirements and the norms
specified by VUDA. Steel and concrete used in the construction are satisfactorily implemented.
5. Handling of hazardous chemicals and other such activities (2)
1. Sodium metal is handled with nickel spatula and stored in kerosene or paraffin wax medium
2. Phenols and Dilmethye Sulphate are handled with rubber gloves and are stored in dark -colored
bottles in a cool place.
3. Ether is always kept away from a flame and stored in a cool place and Benzol Chloride is handled
wearing a mask and is stored in air-tight vessels in a cool place.
6. Emergency Medical Care and First-aid
Anil Neerukonda Educational Society has been running a 300-bed hospital with about 12 specialist doctors
and excellent diagnostic and infrastructural facilities with an ambulance in the area adjoining ANITS
campus. This has been operational for the last 7 years and ANITS students and staff can avail themselves of
this facility.
114
CRITERION 7 Continuous Improvement 75
7. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)
7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (30) POs (20)
The Set attainment level of 2 has been used to evaluate the action needed for each of the POs and PSOs. It
has been observed that all POs and PSOs for CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 have been attained with respect to
the Set attainment levels and hence no action is needed. However, action has been initiated in respect of
POs and PSOs, where the CO attainment levels are low and the same are presented in Table B.7.1 for the
last three academic years.
The Set PO/PSO Attainment level used is 2 for all POs/PSOs during the assessment period. Based on this, it was observed that all POs and PSOs have been attained for the program for all assessment years. However, courses where CO attainment level is low have been identified and the analysis and plan of action has been drafted and implemented. The details are given in Table B.7.1
Table B.7.1
CAY (2018-19)
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 2.05
1. Lack of understanding in technical terms and concepts (EG)
2. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SOM)
3. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (EE-I)
4. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. (FM-I)
5. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-I)
6. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SS)
Action: 1. Emphasis upon technical terms and concepts in classes (EG) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SOM) 3. More problems will be given for practice (SOM) 4. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals (EE-I) 5. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 6. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-I) 7. More problems will be given for practice (SA-I) 8. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SS) 9. More problems will be given for practice(SS)
115
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 2.02
1. Practical importance of mix design is not understood (CT)
2. Lack of knowledge in analyzing complex problems in surveying (SUR-I, II)
3. Due to lack of basic knowledge in Environmental reforms (EE-I, II)
4. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-I)
5. Hydraulic machines design problems are found to be more difficult for students to analyze (FM-II)
6. Students find it difficult to apply the concepts for problem analysis (SS)
Action: 1. Emphasis in classes upon Practical importance of Concrete and Mix Design (CT) 2. More Practical problems are focused upon (SUR-I, II) 3. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications (EE-I, II) 4. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-I) 5. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 6. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (FM-II) 7. More numericals to be dealt focusing upon concept and its utilization for problem analysis (SS)
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO3 2.0 2.04
1. Students find it difficult to solve the Complex engineering problems (EM)
2. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SOM)
3. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-I)
4. Lack of understanding the importance of building drawings in Civil Engineering (BPD)
5. Lack of application of concepts to design (GTE-I) 6. Fundamental knowledge of the subject not
understood well (TE-I) 7. Deficiency in analyzing complex Design
Engineering problems (SS)
116
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (EM) 2. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 3. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty have cleared all
the doubts with one to one interaction. (SOM) 4. Advised to practice a greater number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-I) 5. Practical examples are delivered focusing importance of building drawing in Civil Engineering
(BPD) 6. Emphasis upon lectures with application of concepts to design (GTE-I) 7. Classes focused with imparting fundamentals (TE-I) 8. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SS)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 2.05
1. Lack of understanding research importance (EG, CT)
2. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SOM)
3. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems (EE-I, II)
4. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-I, II)
5. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation (FM-I, II, WRE-II)
Action: 1. Classes focused with highlighting the importance of research related areas of civil engineering
(EG, CT) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SOM) 3. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (EE-I, II) 4. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-I, II) 5. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-I, II, WRE-II)
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 2.0 2.10
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (EE-I, II)
2. Lack of knowledge about usage of modern tools in drawing (BPD)
Action : 1. Students will be taken to Industrial Visit to understand the modern equipment usage in the
laboratory. (EE-I, II) 2. Students made to draw in AUTOCAD Software after completing the it on the Chart (BPD)
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
117
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO6 2.0 2.27
1. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL
problems (EE-I, II)
2. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering
solutions on environment and society (RCS-I)
3. Lack of understanding of societal importance of
massive civil engineering structures (TE-I, WRE-I)
Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during
challenging projects are discussed during course work (EE-I, II, RCS-I) 2. Emphasis upon is societal importance is dealt in Classes (TE-I, WRE-I)
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 2.0 2.07 1. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable
solutions (EE-I, II)
Action 1: 1. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (EE-I, II)
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 2.0 2.22 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action needed
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 2.47 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action needed
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.28
1. Students lack the understanding how drawings need to communicate effectively in civil engineering areas. (BPD)
Action: 1. Emphasis in classes is laid upon the importance of communication through drawings in civil
engineering areas. (BPD)
118
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 2.14 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action Needed
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 2.0 2.02
1. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SOM)
2. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with the recent updates. (SA-I&II)
3. Less exposure to recent updates (EE-I, II) 4. Students found it to be difficult to get
acquainted with the recent updates. (RCS-I, TE-
I)
Action: 1. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture
(SOM) 2. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent
technologies. (SA-I&II) 3. Workshops and Technical talks are conducted to make students aware of recent technologies
(EE-I, II) 4. Practical approach of teaching is to be adopted. (RCS-I, TE-I)
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 2.02
1. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. (FM-I)
2. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-I)
3. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SS)
4. Practical importance of mix design is not understood (CT)
119
Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-I) 3. More problems will be given for practice (SA-I) 4. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SS) 5. More problems will be given for practice (SS) 6. Emphasis in classes upon Practical importance of Concrete and Mix Design (CT)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 2.02
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering
problems (EE-I, II)
2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-I, II)
3. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation (FM-I, II, WRE-II)
4. Lack of knowledge about usage of modern tools in drawing (BPD)
Action: 1. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (EE-I, II) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-I, II) 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-I, II, WRE-II) 4. Students made to draw in AUTOCAD Software after completing the it on the Chart (BPD)
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
PSO3 2.0 2.17
1. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering solutions
on environment and society (RCS-I)
2. Lack of understanding of societal importance of massive
civil engineering structures (TE-I, WRE-I)
3. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions
(EE-I, II)
Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during
challenging projects are discussed during course work (EE-I, II, RCS-I) 2. Emphasis upon is societal importance is dealt in Classes (TE-I, WRE-I) 3. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (EE-I, II)
120
Table B.7.1
CAYm1 (2017-18)
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 2.24
1. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SOM)
2. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to mathematical basic fundamental in those subjects. (FM-I)
3. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. (FM-I)
4. Lateral entry Students are not exposed to mathematical basic fundamental in those subjects. (FM-I)
5. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. (FM-I)
6. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-II)
Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SOM) 2. More problems will be given for practice(SOM) 3. Additional classes to be conducted to introduce Fluid mechanics fundamental concepts. (FM-I) 4. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (FM-I) 5. More problems will be given for practice (FM-I) 6. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-II) 7. More problems will be given for practice (SA-II)
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 2.23
1. As the subject involves (SOM) mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (SOM)
2. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-II)
3. Hydraulic machines design problems are found to be more difficult for students to analyze (FM-II)
Action: 1. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(SOM) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (SOM) 3. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-II) 4. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 5. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (FM-II) 6. More problems will be given for practice. (FM-II)
121
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO3 2.0 2.23
1. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SOM)
2. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-II)
3. Students found it difficult to apply the principles of Energy conservation in impact of jets (FM-II)
Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the
doubts with one to one interaction. (SOM) 2. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-II) 3. More emphasis on mathematical basic to be given in the previous course (FM-II) 4. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (FM-II)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 2.27
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SOM)
2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-II)
3. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation for conducting dimensional analysis (FM-II)
Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SOM) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-II) 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-II)
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 2.0 2.41 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action 1: No action needed
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 2.0 2.50 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action 1: No action needed
122
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 2.0 2.35 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action 1: No action needed
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 2.0 2.41 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action needed
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 2.76 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action needed
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.49 1. Students facing problems in expressing their
conceptual views (FM-II)
Action: 1. Student technical seminars to be conducted for enhancing their technical knowledge and
communication skills. (FM-II)
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 2.32 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action needed
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 2.0 2.26 5. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SOM) 6. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with
the recent updates. (SA-I&II)
123
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action : 5. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture (SOM) 6. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent
technologies. (SA-I&II)
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 2.23
1. Students find it difficult to solve & analyze complex Engineering Problems (SA-II)
2. Hydraulic machines design problems are found to be more difficult for students to analyze (FM-II)
Action : 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-II) 2. More problems will be given for practice (SA-II) 3. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (FM-II) 4. More problems will be given for practice. (FM-II)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 2.34
1. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-II)
2. Students found difficult to understand data interpretation for conducting dimensional analysis (FM-II)
Action : 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-II) 2. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (FM-II)
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
PSO3 2.0 2.43 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action : No action needed
124
Table B.7.1
CAYm2 (2016-17)
POs Target Level Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 2.26
1. Students have been introduced to core subjects in civil engineering due to which they are finding difficulty to understand and analyse engineering problems. (SM)
2. Engineering Mechanics requires the strong foundation
of theoretical and practical knowledge of science and
mathematics, which the students study in their first
year, but student’s lags in correlating the theoretical
concepts with applications. (EM)
3. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-III)
4. Students found it difficult to apply mathematical
integrations for solving complex engineering problems.
(APC)
5. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (GIT)
Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(SM) 2. More problems will be given for practice (SM) 3. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EM) 4. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 5. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (SA-III) 6. More problems will be given for practice (SA-III) 7. More number of problems are to be practiced. (APC) 8. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals. (GIT)
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 2.19
1. As the subject involves (SM) mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (SM)
2. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (SA-III)
3. Students find it difficult to apply theoretical concepts to practical problems (EM)
4. Students found it difficult to apply the basics of environmental sciences. (APC)
Action: 1. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(SM) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (SM) 3. Encouraged to develop their attitude in problem solving ability through tutorial classes (SA-III) 4. Video lectures on practical applications are shown in the class room (EM)
125
POs Target Level Attainment Level
Observations
5. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications (EM) 6. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (EM) 7. Fundamentals of environmental sciences are to be taught in addition along with the present course.
(APC)
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO3 2.0 2.2
1. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (SM)
2. Deficiency in analyzing complex Engineering problems (SA-III)
3. Students find it difficult to solve the Complex engineering problems (EM)
4. Students found it difficult to distinguish the stability
conditions of environment required to design stack
height. (APC)
5. Students find it difficult to correlate the effect of the
design solutions on public health, safety and
environment. (GIT)
Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty have cleared all the
doubts with one to one interaction. (SM) 2. Advised to practice more number of complex problems by home assignments (SA-III) 3. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (EM) 4. More problems will be given for practice (EM) 5. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (APC) 6. Practical approach of teaching to be adopted. (GIT)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 2.21
1. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (SM)
2. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-III)
3. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (APC)
4. Students found difficult to select suitable stabilization method based on data interpretation. (GIT)
5. Students find it difficult to solve the engineering problems (EM)
6. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (EM)
7. Subject involves both analysis and design (EM)
126
POs Target Level Attainment Level
Observations
Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SM) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-III) 3. More number of problems is being practiced in the class. (APC) 4. Illustrative approach of teaching to be adopted. (GIT) 5. More emphasis is given to improve the interpretation of data from the given problem (EM)
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO5 2.0 2.35
1. Students found it difficult to get acquaintance with usage of modern construction equipment/material and their suitability (GIT)
2. Students found it difficult to understand the properties of pollution control design systems (APC)
Action:
1. Students are introduced to modern engineering equipment/material in construction through in -class
samples, industrial visits. (GIT)
2. Industrial and field visits are conducted for exposure to the usage of modern equipment. (APC)
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 2.0 2.39
1. Lack of knowledge of the impact of engineering
solutions on environment and society (GIT)
2. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (APC)
3. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL problems
(SA-III)
Action: 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during challenging
projects are discussed during course work. (GIT) 2. Workshops and Seminars addressed by the Professionals from Industry and Academics are
conducted for better understanding of the students. (APC) 3. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during challenging
projects are discussed during course work (SA-III)
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
127
POs Target Level Attainment Level
Observations
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO7 2.0 2.16 1. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions
(APC)
Action :
1. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (APC)
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO8 2.0 2.33 1. Lack of knowledge in the importance conservation of
resources (APC)
Action:
1. Motivation towards usage of resources for the needs of future society. (APC)
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 2.81 1. Lack of analyzing skills in multidisciplinary subjects (SA-III)
Action: 2. Tutorials for solving more number of problems by forming a group (SA-III)
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.48 1. Student is unable to express and put forward his
knowledge in solving the engineering problems (SA-III)
Action: 1. More number of problems is to be solved. (SA-III)
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 2.44 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action needed
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
128
POs Target Level Attainment Level
Observations
PO12 2.0 2.28 1. Less exposure to the real time societal problems (SM) 2. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with
the recent updates. (SA-III) 3. Students found it to be difficult to get acquainted with
the recent updates. (GIT)
4. Less exposure to recent updates (APC)
Action : 1. Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video lecture (SM) 2. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent
technologies. (SA-III) 3. Workshops and guest lectures are to be organized in order to make students aware of recent
technologies. (GIT) 4. Practical approach of teaching is to be adopted. (GIT) 5. Workshops and Technical talks are conducted to make students aware of recent technologies (APC)
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 2.21
1. Basic knowledge of engineering fundamentals is not well understood. (GIT)
2. Students found it difficult to apply mathematical integrations for solving complex engineering problems. (APC)
Action : 1. Tutorials are to be conducted focusing engineering fundamentals. (GIT) 2. More number of problems are to be practiced. (APC)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 2.28
1. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data from the given problem (SA-III)
2. Subject involves both analysis and design (EM) 3. Students found it difficult to get acquaintance with
usage of modern construction equipment/material and their suitability (GIT)
Action : 1. More problems will be given for practice. (SA-III) 2. More emphasis is given to improve the interpretation of data from the given problem (EM) 3. Students are introduced to modern engineering equipment/material in construction through
in-class samples, industrial visits. (GIT)
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
129
PSO3 2.0 2.28
1. Less exposure to the real time CONTEXTUAL problems
(SA-III)
2. Lack of knowledge on necessity of sustainable solutions
(APC)
Action : 1. Case studies representing the impact of certain engineering solutions adopted during
challenging projects are discussed during course work (SA-III) 2. Various Case studies with impact on environment have been discussed. (APC)
7.2. Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
(Academic Audit system/process and its implementation in relation to Continuous Improvement)
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) functioning under the auspices of NAAC conducts Academic Audit
every year for all Departments. The schedule of Academic Audit conducted during the assessment years is
given in Table B 7.2a
Table B 7.2a
S.
No.
Year Schedule of Academic Audit
1 CAY 2018-19 27-08-2018 to 28-08-2018
2 CAYm1 2017-18 09-08-2017 to 11-08-2017
3 CAYm2 2016-17 23-04-2016
The feedback and suggestions given during the Academic audit in each academic audit are incorporated to
prepare Action plan for subsequent year. Details of Action taken are shown in Table B 7.2b.
Table B 7.2b Action on Academic Audit
CAY 2018-19
S.
No.
Action on Academic Audit Faculty Coordinators
1 Feedback on course from Alumni and Recruiters Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Mr. Ch. Vineel
2 Feedback on course from Companies (Minimum 5
companies including core companies)
Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Mr. Ch. Vineel
3 Justification in writing for CO-PO Mapping Mr. T.V.Viswa Teja & Concerned
Faculty Member
4 Design Subjects with Higher learning Levels Concerned Faculty Member
5 Record of mentoring students with backlogs Mentors & Mr. J. Vikranth
6 Experiment wise viva questions Concerned Laboratory Faculty
Member
7 Rubrics for drawing or design subjects where student
is strong or weak
Concerned Faculty Member
130
S.
No.
Action on Academic Audit Faculty Coordinators
8 Classification of projects into Best/ Average/ Below
Average Grades
Project Work Coordinator
9 Activities related to MoU’s Mr. Ch. Vineel, T&P Coordinator
10 CO- Question- Bloom’s level mapping for
assignments
Concerned Faculty Member
Table B 7.2b Action on Academic Audit
CAYm1 2017-18
S.
No.
Action on Academic Audit Faculty Coordinators
1 More publications to be made student project work All faculty members
2 Provide more scope to students for self-learning Ch.Vineel, T&P Coordinator
Table B 7.2b Action on Academic Audit
CAYm2 2016-17
S.
No.
Actionable point Whether Action taken Faculty Coordinators
1 Remedial classes were conducted for
weak students but not recorded
Yes Class Teachers
7.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (10)
Assessment is based on improvement in:
Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay packages etc.
Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in premier institutions
Entrepreneurs
Academic Year 2017-18
(CAYm1)
2016-17
(CAYm2)
2015-16
(CAYm3)
Number of Students Placed 15 22 30
Number of students pursuing Higher Studies 09 05 07
131
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program (10)
Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level
entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th Standard and
percentage marks of the lateral entry students.
Table B.7.4
Item CAY
2018-19
CAYm1
2017-18
CAYm2
2016-17 Name of the Entrance
Examination
National Level
Entrance
Examination
(Name of the
Entrance
Examination)
NA
No. of Students
admitted NA NA NA
Opening
Score/Rank NA NA NA
Closing
Score/Rank NA NA NA
State/University/
Level Entrance
Examination/other
s (Name of the
Entrance
Examination)
AP EAMCET
No. of Students
admitted 28 38 36
Opening
Score/Rank 9278 6807 9379
Closing
Score/Rank 1,26,386 1,36,519 1,16,410
Name of the
Entrance
Examination for
Lateral Entry or
Later entry details)
AP ECET
No. of Students
admitted 16 17 18
Opening
Score/Rank 16 57 42
Closing
Score/Rank 5527 4403 3986
Average CBSE/Any other Board Results of admitted students
(Physics, Chemistry & Maths)
88.02 92.55 92.67
132
CRITERION 8 First Year Academics 50
8. FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)
8.1 First year student faculty ratio (FYSFR) (5)
Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSFR:
Table B 8.1
Year Number of students (approved intake strength)
Number of faculty members (considering fractional load)
FYSFR Assessment= (5*20)/FYSFR
CAY 2018-19
1080 61 17.7:1 5
CAYm1 2017-18
1080 64 16.8:1 5
CAYm2 2016-17
1020 60 17.0:1 5
Average Assessment 5
Assessment= (5*20)/ Average FYSFR (Limited to Max.5) 20 (5)
*Note: If FYSFR is greater than 25, then assessment equal to zero.
8.2 Qualification of faculty teaching First year common courses (5)
Assessment of qualification= (5x+3y)/RF, where
X = Number of faculty members with PhD
Y= Number of faculty members with Post-graduate qualification
RF= Number faculty member required as per SFR of 15:1,
Faculty definition as defined in 5.1
Table B.8.2
Year X Y RF Assessment of faculty
qualification
CAY 2018-19
22 39 54 4.20
CAY m1 2017-18
23 41 54 4.22
CAYm2 2016-17
22 38 51 4.39
Average assessment of faculty qualification
4.27
133
8.3 First Year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Performance = (Mean of 1st year grade point average of all successful students on a 10 point
scale) or (mean of % of marks in first year of all successful students/10) (no.of successful
students/number of students appeared in the examinations)
Successful students those who are permitted to proceed to the second year
Year Average of GPA of Successful Students Average Marks
ECE EEE MECH IT CSE CIVIL CHEM
2018-19 8.26 8.06 8.14 8.09 8.30 7.97 7.82 8.08 8.08
CAYm1 2017-18
8.267 7.966 7.831 8.051 8.124 7.738 8.051 8.00 8.00
CAYm2 2016-17
8.321 7.925 7.953 8.076 8.198 7.694 7.812 7.99 7.99
Average Marks 8.02
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses - (10)
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course
Outcomes of first year is done (5)
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses - 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 (10)
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course
Outcomes of first year is done (5)
The performance of a student in the first year theory as well as lab courses shall be evaluated to the
maximum of 100 marks in each course. The assessment is for 40 marks through internal evaluation and 60
marks through external evaluation in theory and 50 marks through internal and 50 marks through external
evaluation in labs.
Internal Evaluation for Theory:
According to the scheme notified by the department at the beginning of the year, the faculty awards 20
out of 40 sessional marks through continuous assessment which includes class tests, assignments and
attendance. The rest of the 20 marks are awarded by considering the average of 2 midterm examinations
conducted as per the schedule.
Internal Evaluation for Lab:
As per the scheme notified by the department concerned at the beginning of the year, the lab internal
evaluation is assessed for 50 marks which include continuous assessment as well as viva voce, record
submission and internal lab examination at the end of the first year course work.
The course outcomes (COs) of all first year courses is recorded and the attainment levels of those COs are
evaluated by noting the performance of each student in the midterm examinations and continuous
134
evaluation (assignments, class tests, laboratory tests). The class mean is taken as reference mark and the
attainment levels are based how many students have scored above the mean as given below.
Table-1.0
Percentage range of students scoring above mean
Assessment Scale COs attainment level
75 above High 3
60-75 Medium 2
40-60 Low 1
External evaluation of semester end examinations (2015-16):
For the determination of attainment levels of external evaluation, two parameters are set -
1. Overall Pass percentage of the course in the semester end examinations.
2. Percentage of ‘O’, ‘A+’ and ‘A’ grades of the course in the semester end exams. The attainment levels
of overall pass percentage of students in the semester end examinations are considered as shown
below: Table-1.1
Pass percentage range Assessment Scale COs attainment level
75 above High 3
55-75 Medium 2
40-55 Low 1
The attainment levels of percentage of O’ A+ and ‘A’ grades of the course in the Semester end
examinations are indicated as shown below: Table-1.2
% of ‘O’ A+ and ‘A’ grades Assessment Scale COs attainment level
35 & above High 3
20-35 Medium 2
10-20 Low 1
Out of five marks allotted for the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (8.4.2) 2 marks
are allotted for internal assessment and 3 marks for the attainment level of Semester end exams.
The percentage attainment levels of the internal assessment of each first year course are noted. Points are
marked for these attainment levels (as per table-1.1). The average of these points is converted into marks
by dividing it with the maximum points (03) and multiplying with the internal assessment marks- 2. Points
are allotted for the semester end examinations pass percentage in individual courses and ‘O’, ‘A+’ &’A’
grades (as per table-1.2). The average of the points of semester end pass percentage and ‘O’, ‘A+’ &’A’
grades is converted into marks by dividing it with the maximum points (03) and multiplying with the
Semester end examination marks -3.
135
External evaluation of semester end examinations (2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19):
For the evaluation of CO attainment levels of external evaluation is revised under autonomous system and
the following criteria was adopted.
The performance of a student in the semester end examinations was evaluated to the maximum of 60
marks in each course. The class mean is taken as reference mark and the attainment levels are based how
many students have scored above the mean is considered on a 3 point scale as given below.
Table-1.3
Percentage range of students scoring above mean
Assessment Scale COs attainment level
75 above High 3
55-75 Medium 2
40-55 Low 1
The weightage given for internal assessment and external end examinations is 2:3. Then the attainment of
course outcome for the entire class is taken by considering the average of all students in a class. The same
procedure is followed for each course /subject.
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5) Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject plus the performance in the University examination)
Refer to 3.2.2 for further details
The Record of attainment of COs for all first year courses is given in Annexure-16 for the CAY 2018-19.
8.5. Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20)
8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15) The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the institution.
Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs through first year courses.
(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)
Following are the assessment tools used for measuring the attainment of POs and PSOs based on direct assessment.
1) For a given PO, Calculate the attainment level for each course, considering the COs which map with this PO.
2) For example, consider PO2 and Course CIV111, the attainment levels of the COs for this
136
course and the correlation levels with PO2 are shown below
Course CIV111, English in I Year I Semester CAYm1 2017-18
CO Attainment
level
Correlation level
with PO1
CIV111.1 2.6 2
CIV111.2 2 -
CIV111.3 1.4 -
CIV111.4 2.6 -
CIV111.5 2 -
3) To determine the Attainment level for PO2 from this course, the CO attainment level for each CO is multiplied with the corresponding Correlation levels. Their sum is then divided with the sum of the correlation levels. Only the COs (CIV111.1) which correlate with the PO (PO2) are considered in the calculation. Hence attainment level for PO2, for this Course is obtained as
4) The attainment levels for PO2, is determined for all other courses in a similar manner.
5) The average of the attainment levels from all courses obtained in Step3 is then determined for the PO, considering the courses which correlate to the PO2.
6) Similarly, the attainment levels for all POs/PSOs are determined following above steps and the results for CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 are shown in Table B 8.5.1.
137
TABLE B 8.5.1 COURSE – PO/PSO ATTAINMENT FOR FIRST YEAR COURSES
CAY 2018-19
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 1.60 1.60 1.62 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.62
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.08 1.08 0.93 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.21 1.30 1.30 0.80 0.87 0.80
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.98 1.98 2.16 1.85 2.03 2.00 2.00 2.02 1.85 2.00
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20
CIV118 Workshop 2.80 2.60 2.80 2.60
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 0.89 0.87 0.93 0.94 0.89 0.89 0.94 0.89
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.80 2.00 1.63 1.63 1.58 1.25 2.00 1.50 1.67 1.80 2.00 1.56
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 0.73 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.63 0.73 0.95 0.50
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
CIV127 Language Lab 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 2.00 1.80
Direct Attainment 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.4
138
TABLE B 8.5.1 COURSE – PO/PSO ATTAINMENT FOR FIRST YEAR COURSES
CAYm1 2017-18
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.12 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.12
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.80 1.78 1.83 1.80 1.70 1.80 1.74 1.80
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 0.95 0.80 1.04 0.95 1.04 0.90 1.04
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.94 2.00 2.23 1.66 1.95 1.85 1.85 1.94 1.66 1.85
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 1.18 1.16 0.95 1.06 1.15 1.18 1.06 1.15
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 1.68 0.93 1.70 1.65 1.77 2.20 0.80 1.40 1.73 1.68 0.93 1.73
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.64
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.05 1.05 0.96 1.20 1.40 0.96 0.80 1.05 0.96 0.90
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Direct Attainment 1.86 1.70 1.48 1.93 1.94 1.96 1.81 1.81 2.80 2.16 1.70 2.11 1.90 1.94 1.74
139
TABLE B 8.5.1 COURSE – PO/PSO ATTAINMENT FOR FIRST YEAR COURSES
CAYm2 2016-17
Course PO PSO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
CIV111 English 2.60 2.30 2.00 2.00 2.60 2.00
CIV112 Engineering Mathematics – I 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
CIV113 Engineering Physics 1.60 1.48 1.74 1.60 1.70 1.60 1.66 1.60
CIV114 Engineering Drawing 1.71 1.60 1.84 1.71 1.84 1.70 1.84
CIV115 Environmental Sciences 1.52 1.60 1.70 1.49 1.45 1.40 1.40 1.52 1.49 1.40
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV117 Programming With C Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV118 Workshop 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV121 Engineering Mathematics-II 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry 0.91 0.89 0.88 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91
CIV123 Professional Ethics And Human Values 2.64 2.00 2.70 2.63 2.70 3.00 1.80 2.40 2.60 2.64 2.00 2.58
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil Engineers 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76
CIV125 Civil Engineering Materials 1.15 1.10 1.12 1.07 1.20 1.12 1.13 1.15 1.12 1.20
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
CIV127 Language Lab 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Direct Attainment 1.85 1.67 1.83 2.09 1.89 2.06 1.79 2.05 3.00 2.35 2.40 2.35 1.97 2.03 1.78
140
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5) (The attainment levels by direct (student performance) are to be presented through Program level Course-PO matrix as indicated)
Action has been initiated for POs and PSOs where the attainment level is less than 2.0 and the same is
presented in Table B 8.5.2
Table B.8.5.2
CAY (2018-19)
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 2.05
1. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I) 2. Lack of fundamental knowledge related to subject. (EP) 3. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric
projections. (ED) 4. Lack of fundamental science knowledge related to
subject. (ES) 5. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood.
Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II) Lack of basic fundamentals in chemistry (EC)
Action: 1. More problems will be given for practice (EM-I) 2. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EP) 3. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 4. Tutorial classes to be conducted. (ES) 5. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 6. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 2.02
1. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (EM-I)
2. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems.(EP)
3. Absence of understanding the importance in natural sciences in problem analysis.(ES)
4. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC) (EM-II) Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)
141
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action: 1. Additional classes conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 2. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 3. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 4. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 5. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 6. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO3 2.0 2.04 1. Students find difficult in projection of solids. (ED)
Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (ED)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 2.05
1. Students lack knowledge in designing of experiments and interpretation of data. (EP)
2. Deficiencies not observed. (ES) 3. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 4. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data
from the given problem (MC)
Action: 1. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 2. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 3. More problems will be given for practice. (MC)
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 2.0 2.10
1. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and modeling. (EM-I)
2. As the subject involves complex Mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)
Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modeling. (EM-I)
2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 2.0 2.27 1. Students found deficient to assess societal and
consequent responsibilities related to subject. (ES)
142
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures consisting case studies. (ES)
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 2.0 2.07 1. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of
chemistry to the natural environment (EC)
Action 1: 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 2.0 2.22 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action Needed
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 2.47 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action Needed
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.28 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action Needed
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 2.14 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action Needed
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 2.0 2.02 Deficiencies not observed
143
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action: No action Needed
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 2.02
1. Students found it difficult to differentiate horizontal planes and vertical planes. (ED)
2. Students lack fundamental engineering knowledge concerned to subject.(ES)
3. Students were lacking in basic formulas of mathematics (EM-II)
Action : 1. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 2. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 3. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 2.02
3. Students lack knowledge in designing of experiments and interpretation of data. (EP)
4. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 5. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data
from the given problem (MC) 6. Students find it difficult to find correlation between
basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)
Action : 3. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 4. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 5. More problems will be given for practice. (MC) 6. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I)
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
PSO3 2.0 2.17 1. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of
chemistry to the natural environment (EC)
Action : 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)
144
Table B.8.5.2
CAYm1 (2017-18)
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 1.86
6. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I) 7. Lack of fundamental knowledge related to subject. (EP) 8. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric
projections.(ED) 9. Lack of fundamental science knowledge related to
subject. (ES) 10. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood.
Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II)
11. Lack of basic fundamentals in chemistry (EC)
Action: 7. More problems will be given for practice(EM-I) 8. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals (EP) 9. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 10. Tutorial classes to be conducted. (ES) 11. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 12. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 1.7
1. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems. (EM-I)
2. Students lack ability to formulate problem analysis using the first principles.(EP)
3. Students finding difficult to adopt new concepts like Laplace transforms (EM-II)
4. Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)
5. As the subject involves complex Mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)
Action: 1. Additional classes to be conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 2. More problems will be given for practice. (EP) 3. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 4. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 5. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
145
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO3 2.0 1.48 1. Students with poor communication skills were unable
to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (ED)
Action: 1. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the
doubts with one to one interaction. (ED)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 1.93
5. Students lack knowledge in designing of experiments and interpretation of data. (EP)
6. Deficiencies not observed.(ES) 7. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 8. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data
from the given problem (MC)
Action: 4. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 5. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 6. More problems will be given for practice. (MC)
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 2.0 1.94
1. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)
2. Deficiencies not found (EC) (EM-II) 3. As the subject involves complex Mathematical
calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)
Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I) 2. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 2.0 1.96 1. Students found deficient to assess societal and
consequent responsibilities related to subject.(ES)
Action 1: Emphasis upon lectures consisting case studies.(ES)
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
146
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO7 2.0 1.81
1. Lack the ability to correlate sustainability concepts and subject context. (ES)
2. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment.(EC)
Action 1: 1. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment.(EC)
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 2.0 1.81 1. Lack of ability to write effective report on conceptual
views. (EP) 2. Lack of ability to make effective drawings. (ED)
Action: 1. Group activities to be conducted and report has to be submitted on the topic. (EP) 2. Suggesting students to follow online courses on engineering drawing.(ED)
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 2.8
Action:
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.16 1. Deficiencies not observed
Action: 1. No action needed
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 1.7 1. Students found deficit in correlating ethics to management
principles and finance
Action: 1. Emphasis upon lectures with case studies correlating ethics to management
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
PO12 2.0 2.11 1. Deficiencies not observed
147
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action : No action needed
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 1.68
1. Lack of basics in integration concepts. (EM-I)
2. Students found it difficult to visualize isometric
projections. (ED)
3. Basic knowledge of analysis is not well understood. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering Problems (MC) (EM-II)
4. Students with poor communication skills were unable to understand the subject and are unable to communicate their doubts in classrooms. (ED)
Action : 5. More problems will be given for practice (EM-I) 6. 3D graphics to be shown to the students for better understanding of isometric projections. (ED) 7. More emphasis on mathematical basics to be given in the previous semester (MC) (EM-II) 8. Special classes beyond the college hours are conducted where in the faculty has cleared all the
doubts with one to one interaction. (ED)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 1.93
7. Students lack knowledge in designing of experiments and interpretation of data. (EP)
8. Student facing Difficulty in interpreting data (EC) 9. Students find it difficult to interpret the required data
from the given problem (MC) 10. Students find it difficult to find correlation between
basic mathematical principles and concerned modern tools. (EM-I)
Action : 7. Practical approach of teaching is adapted. (EP) 8. Emphasis on problems during class work (EC) 9. More problems will be given for practice. (MC) 10. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modern tools. (EM-I)
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
148
PSO3 2.0 1.89
2. Lack the ability to correlate sustainability concepts and subject context. (ES)
3. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment. (EC)
Action : 1. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment. (EC)
Table B 8.5.2
CAYm2 (2016-17)
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
PO1 2.0 1.85
1. Student found difficulty in understanding three dimensional analytical geometry. (EM-I)
2. Lack of knowledge in fundamentals of thermodynamics and quantum mechanics.(EP)
3. Students found it difficult to differentiate horizontal planes and vertical planes. (ED)
4. Students lack fundamental engineering knowledge concerned to subject.(ES)
5. Students were lacking in basic formulas of mathematics (EM-II)
6. Lack of basic concepts in chemistry (EC) 7. Students find it difficult to solve Engineering
Problems (MC)
Action: 1. Tutorials based on application of fundamentals(EM-I) 2. Emphasis upon lectures focusing thermodynamics and quantum mechanics. (EP) 3. More number of tutorials conducted.(ED & ES) 4. More emphasis on mathematical basics during class work (MC) (EM-II) 5. More emphasis on basics to be taught during class work (EC)
PO2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO2 2.0 1.67
5. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (EM-I)
6. Students lack ability to solve complex engineering problems.(EP)
7. Absence of understanding the importance in natural sciences in problem analysis.(ES)
8. Students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC) (EM-II)
9. Students facing difficult in Correlating the chemical related data to solve problems (EC)
149
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action: 7. Additional classes conducted for the slow learners. (EM-I) 8. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 9. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 10. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II) 11. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EC) 12. More emphasis is given to clarify the concepts and its applications(MC)
PO3: Design/Development of Solution: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO3 2.0 1.83 2. Students find difficult in projection of
solids.(ED) 3. Deficiencies not found.(ES)
Action: 2. Practical approach of teaching to be adapted. (ED)
PO4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO4 2.0 2.09 1. Deficiencies not observed.
Action: 1. No Action needed
PO5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO5 2.0 1.89
3. Students find it difficult to find correlation between basic mathematical principles and modeling. (EM-I)
4. As the subject involves complex Mathematical calculations, some students with poor mathematics background found difficulty to solve numerical problems. (MC)
Action 1: 3. Emphasis upon lectures correlating basic principles and modeling. (EM-I) 4. More classes on analysis to be taught in tutorial classes (MC)
PO6: The Engineering and Society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 2.0 2.06 1. Deficiencies not found
150
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
Action 1: No action needed.
PO7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 2.0 1.79 1. Student find it difficult to correlate
fundamentals of chemistry to the natural environment (EC)
Action 1: 1. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 2.0 2.05 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action needed
PO9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 2.0 3.0 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action needed
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO10 2.0 2.35 1. Deficiency not observed.
Action: 1. No action needed.
PO11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11 2.0 2.44 Deficiencies not observed
Action: No action needed
PO12: Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and lifelong learning in the broadest context of technological change.
151
POs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PO12 2.0 2.4 Deficiencies not observed
Action : No action needed
PSOs Target Level
Attainment Level
Observations
PSO1: Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
PSO1 2.0 1.78
4. Students found it difficult to differentiate horizontal planes and vertical planes. (ED)
5. Students lack fundamental engineering knowledge concerned to subject.(ES)
6. Students were lacking in basic formulas of mathematics (EM-II)
Action : 4. More number of numerical problems is to be discussed in tutorial classes. (EP) 5. Emphasis upon correlative lectures. (ES) 6. More problems will be given for practice on relevant topic. (EM-II)
PSO2: Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid conclusions and recommendations.
PSO2 2.0 2.0 Deficiencies not observed
Action : No action needed
PSO3: Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health, safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
PSO3 2.0 1.92 2. Student find it difficult to correlate fundamentals of
chemistry to the natural environment (EC)
Action : 2. More emphasis on creating awareness to natural environment (EC)
152
CRITERION 9 Student Support Systems 50
9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50) 9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)
Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/career advancement/course work specific/ laboratory specific/all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor: Frequency of meeting: (The institution may report the details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such system)
About 12 students are allotted to a faculty member acting as a mentor. The details of mentoring
(counselling ) batches for the academic year 2016-17 for III Year – II Semester is shown in Annexure-17.
Following are the important features of the mentoring system developed for students
1. Students are provided with separate slots for counseling/Mentoring within the timetable for
professional guidance and career advancement. In this session the faculty member interacts with
his/her counseling batch consisting of 12 students individually. The mentor will call the students
once in week as per the schedule depending on the need and purpose.
2. The record of counselling and mentoring is maintained in proctors file, which is updated on regular
basis.
3. The student will be counseled in the presence of the parent by the mentor, class teacher and the
HoD/Principal.
4. Interaction hours are scheduled every week beyond the college hours were the faculty member
are available to the students in the department for 3:20pm to 5:00pm for course work specific
mentoring. During this interaction students are encouraged and mentored in different course work
laboratories
9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)
(Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process; Average Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis of reward/ corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching & learning and summary of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective actions taken.)
✓ Feedback collected for all courses: Yes/No
1. Feedback collection process
a. The feedback is collected twice in a semester before each Mid examination from students
having minimum attendance of 75 percentage at that time.
b. Feedback collection process is completely anonymous as it is done using online system in
the absence of the concerned faculty members. Hence the students can give free and fair
feedback.
2. Average percentage of students who participate:% based on eligible number of students having
minimum 75% attendance as on the date of collection of feedback.
153
Year / Sem % of students who participate in the feedback
CAY (%)
(2018-19)
CAYm1 (%)
(2017-18)
CAYm2 (%)
(2016-17)
II – I 73.77 89.5 83.8
III – I 83.33 96.9 85.7
IV – I 95.23 71.4 100
Average 84.11 85.9 89.8
II – II 41.17 73.4 95.2
III – II 74.14 85.7 93.7
IV – II 80.30 56.0 96.3
Average 65.20 71.1 95.0
3. Feedback Analysis process
a) Sample feedback form is enclosed in Annexure-18 which shows that there are a total of 15
teaching – learning characteristics on which the feedback from the students is collected online
with such ratings as very good, good, average, below average or poor.
b) The number of students marking each rating (such as very good) is counted for each
characteristic and the percentage is calculated. By giving a rating as given in Table-9.1, the
feedback is evaluated for a maximum marks of five for each characteristic
Table 9.1: Feedback Evaluation
S. No
Percentage Classification
1 <60% Very poor
2 60% - 69% Poor (To improve a lot)
3 70% - 79% O.K (To improve)
4 80% - 84% Good
5 85% - 94% Very good
6 >95% Excellent
c) Example: -
i) The first characteristic (Knowledge of subject) is given the following ratings for the subject
mechanics of solids II Year – I Semester in the year 2015-16 taken on date 02-09-2015
Rating Calculation Scale
Very Good (22/54) x100 = 40.74% 5
Good (21/54) x100 = 38.89% 4
Average (8/54)x100 = 14.81% 3
Below Average (1/54) x100 = 1.85% 2
154
Poor (2/54) x100 = 3.7% 1
The ratings for other characteristic are calculated in a similar way.
ii. The marks obtained for the first characteristic are therefore equal to
5x0.4074+4x0.3889+3x0.1481+2x0.0185+1x0.037 = 4.14
iii. The total marks obtained for all the 15 characteristic are equal to 63.04
The percentage feedback for this subject mechanics of solids is therefore equal to 63.04/
(5x15) x 100 = 84.05%
iv. The percentage of feedback obtained in any subject is classified into the following
categories
4. Basis of reward/corrective measures
Rewards:
a. The feedback report is given to the faculty member with appropriate remarks from the
principal depending upon the percentage of feedback he/she receives. “I congratulate you
on this achievement and appreciate your positive contribution. They are also further
advised to keep up the good work and continue to strive to excel reminding that there is
always a room to further excel”
b. The feedback is given a weight age of 10 out of 100 in the annual performance appraisal of
the faculty members. For faculty members with less than two years experience feedback
percentage given a weightage of 15 out of 100. The annual increment for the faculty
members is given considering feedback in performance appraisal.
c. The faculty members with less than two years experience, when they score excellent
feedback are personally congratulated by the principal.
Corrective measures:
a. Where the feedback obtained for a faculty member in any subject is not satisfactory such
as less than 60% out of 100% the faculty member is informed in writing and cautioned
b. The faculty member will be suggested to focus and improve teaching learning
characteristics for which the feedback obtained is less than 4 out of 5 Poitnts.
c. Where required the head of the department will ask the concerned faculty member to give
practice class in the presence of HoD and subject expert. The teaching learning skills and
subject preparation of the faculty members are evaluated critically during the practice
class and necessary suggestions for improvement are offered.
d. The concerned faculty member is monitored on a regular basis until there is adequate
improvement in the teaching learning as well as the feedback.
e. After adequate time is given to faculty member to work for improvement and incase there is no satisfactory progress or improvement in the faculty members, necessary action is taken including retrenchment from service.
5. Indices
Following are the indices used for measuring quality of teaching and learning
155
Student’s feedback – teaching learning characteristics
S. No
Characteristics
1 Knowledge of The Subject
2 Coming Well Prepared For The Class
3 Giving Clear Explanations
4 Command Of Language
5 Clear And Audible Voice
6 Holding The Attention Of The Students Through The Class
7 Providing More Matter Than In The Text Books
8 Capability To Clear The Doubts Of The Students
9 Encourage Students To Ask Questions And To Participate In Discussions
10 Appreciating Students As And When Deserving
11 Willingness To Help Even Out Of The Class
12 Return Of Valued Test Papers / Records In Time
13 Punctuality And Following Timetable Schedule
14 Coverage Of Syllabus
15 Impartiality ( Treating Of All Students Alike)
6. Number of corrective actions taken
S. No
Academic Year
Year / Semester
Subject Name of the
faculty Corrective
action Impact Analysis
1 CAY
2018-19 - - - - -
2 CAYm1 2017-18
- - - - -
3 CAYm2 2016-17
- - - - -
4 CAYm3 2015-16
II-I Mechanics of solids
(MOS) Mr. K Lovaraju
MOS Practice class
Some improvement
in MOS
II-II Structural Analysis – I
(SA-I) Mr. K Lovaraju
SA-I Practice class
No Improvement.
Faculty was replaced
9.3. Feedback on facilities (5)
Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken.
Feedback form on facilities is given in Table B 9.3. Overall feedback is satisfactory.
Corrective Actions taken
1) Installation of Moodles for learning beyond college hours 2) Upgradation of gymnasium 3) Air-conditioned bus facility 4) Upgradation of Cricket ground with practice net 5) Basket ball court
156
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Feedback on Facilities
Date:
S.No. Name of Facility Available?
Yes/No
Feedback on the facility
1 2 3
1 Library
i) Books
ii) Journals
iii) NPTEL facility
iv) Department Library
v) Availability beyond College hours
2 Faculty members beyond College hours
3 A/c College Bus
4 Laboratories beyond College hours
i) Computer Centre
ii) Other Labs
5 LAN and Internet
6 Moodles
7 Games and Sports, facilities
a) outdoor games
i) Cricket ground with practice net
ii) Volley ball court
iii) Ball badminton court
b) Indoor games
i) Table Tennis
ii) Chess
iii) Caroms
8 Well-equipped gymnasium
9 Electricity: 11 K.V/415V substation
10 Power backup: 250 KVA, 125 KVA and
20KVA standby diesel generators
11 Water supply
i) RO Drinking water
ii) Bore water
12 Counseling
13 Emergency Medical Care
300-bed ANIMS hospital
14 First-aid
1: Poor 2: Satisfactory 3: Exemplary
Additional facilities needed, if any:
Suggestions if any:
157
9.4. Self-Learning (5) (The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness) Facility:
1. Digital library. 2. Wi-Fi connectivity to student laptops.
Materials:
ASCE journals, E- books, NPTEL courses and various other MOOCs. Scope for self-learning / learning beyond the syllabus: Students can enhance their knowledge by self-learning / learning beyond syllabus by the following avenues:
1) Use digital library and browse international journals (ASCE) & e-books. 2) Use institute provided access to ASCE journals through their laptop internet connectivity
within and outside the institute premises. 3) Use NPTEL, other MOOCs and materials. 4) Presenting in weekly student seminars. 5) Guest lectures by industry experts. 6) Assignments.
9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (10) (The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for training/internship/placement, etc.)
Following are the facilities/avenues provided to the students by the training and placement cell. 1. Campus Recruitment Training (CRT) classes for 3 rd year students during summer vacation at the
end of 3rd year and during 4th year 1st semester and also before every important campus placement.
2. Training in Quantitative Aptitude (Q.A.) and Verbal Aptitude (V.A.) during 3 rd year 1st semester and 3rd year 2nd semester, as part of time table along with regular class work.
3. Online practice tests are conducted before and after the training. 4. A Number of guest lectures are organized for career guidance and counseling of students. 5. Career guidance and counseling is also provided by the Head of the Department, Dean of
training and placement and principal at regular intervals. 6. Career guidance and counseling is provided by faculty members who are counselors for
students. 7. Campus placements are arranged by the dean of training and placement and his office by
liaisoning with various industries. 9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell (5) (The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging
entrepreneurship and incubation) (Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be mentioned)
HOD and Faculty members as well as Principal and Management motivate and guide students towards the
large potential for entrepreneurship in civil engineering. Students join industry to gain initial experience and become entrepreneurs in due course. The Entrepreneurship development cell organizes regular
programs to motive the students to become entrepreneurs is coordinated by the Mechanical Department. Various programs organized by the EDC cell as shown in Table 9.6. However, it takes some lean period before the students gain some experience and venture entrepreneurship.
158
Table 9.6 Interaction Sessions Organized
CAY (2018-19)
S. No
Date-Month-Year Resource person with designation % of Stude
nts
1 10-08-2018 Mr.Vamsi, Director Global Edge 100
2 29-12-2018 Dr. G L Siva Kumar Babu, Professor of Civil Engg., I.I.Sc. Bengaluru
65
3 29-12-2018 Dr. A Santharam, Adjunct Professor, ANITS
65
4 29-12-2018 Prof.C.N.V.Satyanarayana Reddy, Professor of Civil Engg., Andhra University
65
5 29-12-2018 Sri Srinivasa Raju, CEO, Geomardy, Visakhapatnam
65
6 29-12-2018 Sri. Madan Kumar Annam, Head of Engineering, Keller India, Chennai
65
7 13-07-2018 Dr.T.V.Praveen, Professor A.U. College of Engineering, Andhra University
60
8 19-11-2018
to 22-11-2018
Kasi Viswanatham Ponnapalli IIC Academy
66
9 19-11-2018 to
22-11-2018 Srikanth Ankam IIC Academy
66
Interaction Sessions Organized CAYm1 (2017-18)
S. No
Date-Month-Year
Resource person with designation % of Students
1 15-09-2017 Dr. A. Santha Ram, Senior Mining Geologist, (Retd.), Indian Bureau of Mines
84
2 11-10-2017 Sri. A K Mehera, Chief Engineer, Visakhapatnam Port Trust
59
3 11-10-2017 Dr. V Venkateswara Rao, Professor (Retd), Andhra University
59
4 11-10-2017 Sri. Rishi Jaiswal, Scientist-D, DRDO, Visakhapatnam
59
5 11-10-2017 Prof. C N V Suryanarayana Reddy, Andhra University
59
6 24-10-2017 Ravi Lakshmi Narayana, Environmental Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Visakhapatnam
100
7 28-04-2018 Bharath Paladugu, Director, Himma International Academy
100
159
Interaction Sessions Organized
CAY (2016-17)
S. No
Date-Month-Year Resource person with designation % of Students
1 09-07-2016 Sri. D K Visweswara Rao Chief Engineer, CRDA, Amaravathi
67
2 15-07-2016 Sri. R Nageswara Rao, Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Circle, Visakhapatnam
84
3 01-10-2016 Dr. Sivakumar Babu, Professor, Civil Engg, I.I.Sc., Bangalore
100
160
9.7. Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)
(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities) (Quantify activities such as NCC, NSS etc.)
Table B 9.7 CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAY 2018-19
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
Participated
1 “WISSENAIRE” Conducted by IIT Bhubaneswar 1st to 3rd Feb 2019 1
2 “ CEA FEST 2019” Conducted by IIT Madras 8th to 10th March
2019 5
3 “VINIRMITHI2K19” Conducted by ANITS 8th & 9th March 2019 179
4 51st Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2018 111
5 115th birth anniversary celebrations of Padmabushan Dr. K L Rao
15th July 2018 100
EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAY 2018-19
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
participated
1 Annual Day Games & Sports Event 1st to 5th Jan
2019 45
2 Relief camp on Srikakulam cyclone 14th October
2018 3
3 NRI Blood Donation Camp 30th August 2018 3
161
Table B 9.7 CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAYm1 2017-18
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
Participated
1 “SHAASTRA 2018” Conducted by I.I.T.Madras 5th Jan 2018 3
2 “ASPIRE2K18” Conducted by Aditya College of Engineering
23rd Feb 2018 1
3 “CHAKRAVYUH 2K18” Conducted by Raghu College of Engineering
3rd March 2018 1
4 “SOUDHA2K18” Conducted by J.N.T.U.K 24th Feb 2018 3
5 “SATHAKARYAN” Conducted by GVP College of Engineering
30th December 2017 3
6 “VINIRMITHI2K18” Conducted by ANITS 17th Feb 2018 252
7 115th birth anniversary celebrations of Padmabushan Dr. K L Rao
15th July 2017 180
8 50th Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2017 180
EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAYm1 2017-18
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
participated
1 Annual Day Games & Sports Event 2nd to 5th Jan
2018 45
2 Inter-Collegiate Championship- Tennis Sept – Oct, 2017 1
162
Table B 9.7 CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAYm2 2016-17
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
Participated
1 “SUPERNOVA-2K17” Conducted by SRKREC 5th & 6th Jan 2017 8
2 114th birth anniversary celebrations of Padmabushan Dr. K L Rao
15th July 2016 180
3 49th Engineers Day celebrations 15th Sep 2016 180
4 “VISTA-2K17” Conducted by Vignan College of Engineering
17th & 18th March 7
5 “Mech UTSAV Tech Fest” Conducted by GITAM, Vskp
30th & 31st December
4
EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
CAYm2 2016-17
S. No.
Activity Date No. of students
participated
1 Annual Day Dance Competitions Results 28th Jan 2017 5
2 Anits National Service Scheme (NSS) 24th Jan 2017 -
163
CRITERION 10 Governance, Institutional Support And Financial Resources 120
10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (120)
10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40) 10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5) Our Vision...
ANITS envisions emerging as a world-class technical institution whose products represent a good blend of
technological excellence and the best of human values.
Our Mission...
To train young men and women into competent and confident engineers with excellent communicational
skills, to face the challenges of future technology changes, by imparting holistic technical education using the
best of infrastructure, outstanding technical and teaching expertise and an exemplary work culture, besides
molding them into good citizens.
10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules, procedures,
recruitment and promotional policies (10) Governing body is constituted as per the guidelines provided by AICTE. The organization chart of
administrative set up has been placed in Annexure-19 along with the functions of the various bodies.
The Governing Body meets twice a year and the minutes are recorded. The attendance is generally
80%.
All other academic and administrative bodies, their memberships, functions, and responsibilities,
frequency of the meetings along with few sample minutes of the meetings are given below.
S. No. Academic
Year Date of meeting
No. of members attended
Agenda of the meeting
Board of studies Meetings
1. 2015-16 20.06.2015 129 1. Finalization of first year curriculum 2. Any other item
2. 2015-16 26.03.2016 108 1. Finalization of II/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd
semester 2. Any other item
3. 2016-17 25.03.2017 111
1. Finalize the 3rd year scheme of instruction and the syllabus for 17-18 academic year
2. Any other item
4. 2017-18 28.04.2018 120
1. To finalize the 4th year scheme of instruction of curriculum and the syllabus for 18-19 academic year
2. Implementation of AICTE proposed model curriculum – structure and first year syllabus
5. 2018-19 30.03.2019 110 1. To finalize the 4th year scheme of instruction of curriculum and the
164
syllabus for 2018-19 academic year 2. Implementation of AICTE proposed
model curriculum – structure and first year syllabus
Academic Council Meetings
1. 2015-16 25.05.2015 17
1. Nomination of subject experts (externals) to the BOS for all the departments
2. Any Other item
2. 215-16 27.06.2015 25
1. Scrutiny and approval of the proposals of the BOS of all academic departments with regard to course of study, academic regulations, curricula, syllabi, instructional and evaluation arrangements, methods and procedures relevant there to etc.,
2. Approval of the academic and examination rules & regulations of the college in the autonomous system
3. Approval for the regulations for sports, extra-curricular activities and proper maintenance and functioning of the play ground and hostels
4. Consideration of proposals for introduction of new courses of study (if any),
5. Institution of scholarships, studentships, fellowships, prizes and medals and regulation for the award of the same,
6. Approvals of the Panel of paper setters and Examiners,
7. Schedule of examinations under Autonomous system.
3. 2016-17 02.04.2016 28
1. Approval of II/IV 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,
2. Approval of the panel of paper setters, 3. Schedule of Examinations II/IV B.Tech.
under Autonomous Scheme
4. 2016-17 01.04.2017 25
1. Approval of III/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,
2. Approval of M.Tech. Civil – Soil Mechanics,
3. Approval of Panel of paper setters
5. 2017-18 20.06.2017 22
1. Academic performance of students under Autonomous scheme,
2. Academic regulations for promoting the students,
3. Any other item
6. 2017-18 05.05.2018 20
1. Approval of IV/IV B.Tech. 1st & 2nd semester curriculum,
2. Implementation of AICTE proposed model curriculum and its modalities,
3. Any other item
165
Board of Governing Meeting:
1. 2015-16 19.06.2015 10
1. Ratification of the Budget estimates for the autonomous grant relating to the academic year 2015-16 submitted by the Principal to UGC,
2. Approval of Budget for 2015-16, 3. Ratification of nomination of four
members to the Academic Council representing areas such as Engineering and Industry,
4. Ratification of the decision of the Principal to conduct the meeting of the Board of studies of all academic departments and Academic Council on 20.06.15 and 27.06.15 respectively,
5. Fixation of special fees and the examination fees payable by the students for the academic year 2015-16 as an Autonomous college, approval for filing-up office staff and examination cell,
6. Any other item
2. 2015-16 28.06.2015 9
1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of Academic Council
2. Consideration and approval of the recommendation of the Academic Council regarding institution scholarships, Fellowships, Studentships, Medals, Prizes and Certificates
3. 2015-16 01.02.2016 9
1. To confirm the minutes of the 36th Governing Body meeting held on 28-06-2015,
2. Action taken report on the previous minutes,
3. Ratification of all the appointments made subsequent to the previous Governing Body meeting,
4. Ratification of the decision of the Principal to conduct the meetings of the Board of Studies of all academic Depts. and Academic Council on 26-03-2016 and 02-04-2016,
5. To review the results of B.E./B.Tech. 1st Semester (2015-16),
6. Report on Placements, 7. Evaluation of additional space
needed, 8.Report on AFRC
4. 2015-16 03.04.2016 9
1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of the meeting of the Academic Council held on 02-04-2016;
166
5. 2016-17 28.08.2016 7
1. Ratification of the Budget estimates for the under autonomous stream relating to academic year 2016-17 which is approved by finance committee,
2. Approval of college Budget for the academic year 2016-17,
3. Ratification of all appointments made since last meeting of BOG,
4. Finalization of dates for BOS & Academic Council meeting for 2017-18,
5. Applying to AICTE for additional courses for the academic year 2017-18
6. 2016-17 08.04.2017
1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of the meeting of the Academic Council held on 01-04-2017;
2. Review on placements and results of 2016-17
7. 2017-18 05.10.2017 10
1. Approval of college budget for the academic year 2017-18;
2. Ratification of all appointments made since last BOG meeting;
3. Approval of minutes of Academic Council meeting held on 20th June, 2017,
4. Finalization of dates for BoS and Academic Council meetings for 2017-18,
5. Quality enhancement by conducting internal audit
8. 2017-18 12.05.2018 8
1. Consideration and approval of the minutes of the meeting of the Academic Council held on 05-05-2018;
2. Approval of college budget for the academic year 2018-19;
3. Ratification of all appointments made since last BOG meeting;
4. Finalization of dates for BoS and Academic Council meetings for 2018-19,
5. Review on various activities in the academic 2017-18
An Administration manual with service and conduct a rule of all employees of ANITS has been prepared and has been accepted by BOG vide meeting No: 12 dated 24th August 2006. It is published and supplied to each and every individual Department for awareness among the employees / students apart from the prospectus which is published every year is also supplied to all and placed in the website as well. Various committees were constituted to oversee effective functioning of various activities in the college
and across all the departments.
167
1. Committee for Examinations:
It has to schedule the examinations after consulting the committee for academic matters.
The conduct of mid examinations and check for distribution of corrected papers.
To conduct final examinations including supplementary.
To conduct laboratory examinations.
To arrange invigilators to various examinations, and to allot various rooms to them.
To plan for numbering / seating arrangements of the students.
To implement the numbering in the rooms.
To fix the laboratory examination dates in coordination with HODs of various departments and
respective department of the University and to provide hospitality to external examiners.
To collect the finalized sessional marks from the faculty with the help of HODs and to handover
them to Andhra University.
Preparation of lists of supplementary candidates and to display them in the notice boards.
To control the stationery concern of examinations.
a) Squad for checking Examination:
The committee consists of all the HODs and Professors of various departments. They will be making
sudden and surprise visits being coordinated by the Principal.
2. Attendance Committee:
To supervise and to finalize the attendance particulars of students regularly.
To Send the reports to HODs about the lagging students in the attendance and to get back to HODs
about the same to enquire if the parents are contacted or not.
To monitor the discipline of all the students for recording.
To prepare the final attendance reports for preparing condonation and detention lists.
3. Net Working Committee:
To check the working of Internet.
To check the working of Intranet.
To plan listed modifications in the field of Network for better communication and all the other
relevant works.
4. Amenities Committee:
To check about water supply, power supply facilities, sanitary maintenance etc.
To monitor greenery and cleanness of campus and overall cleanliness.
To pursue welfare measures like group insurance, group cell phones, etc.
To check the running of the Canteen.
5. Grievances and Welfare Committee:
To receive any grievances and to propose solutions
To receive, to address any grievances of faculty and non-teaching staff and try to prepare solutions
to address them with the help of administration.
To receive any problems concern to Women faculty and non-teaching staff and Girl Students.
To plan for welfare measures and facilities concerned to ladies.
6. Transport Committee:
To organize the bus transport network.
To check the suitability of transport of various programs conducted in the campus.
To check steps for prevention of un-authorized boarders
To see that Anti-ragging prevails in the buses.
168
7. Anti-Ragging Committee:
To check with any sort of ragging
To report to the administration any activities concerned to lead to ragging.
To display the various boards for educating about the Anti -ragging and to display
help-line numbers.
8. First year coordination committee:
To coordinate academic activities of all the first year classes including time tables.
Conducting of practical’s, distribution of class rooms for conducting various classes.
Coordination with respective HODs when seminars and conferences take place.
Coordinating with all the HODs to organize interdisciplinary subjects etc.
9. Committee for Website Maintenance:
To prepare the web page.
To update it whenever required, at least once a month.
To check the updates of web site every fortnight and also to keep the information of any special
programs as and when organized.
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and Grievance Redressal Mechanism (10)
All the academic activities are decentralized and departments function independently as per the
academic calendar.
Grievance-Redressal committee exists within the college level with Convener and three faculty
members, one supporting staff and two students (both male and female) from final year.
10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers (10) The Institution has well defined mechanism to monitor effective and efficient use of available resources.
College obtains proposals from concerned departments in a academic year under three different heads of
account i.e., capital budget, maintenance budget and developmental budget. After assessing the projected
income for an academic year, college allocates budget to each department and institution with minute
details. After the allocation, the departments can avail the financial resources within the sanctioned limit.
Purchases will be made with the recommendations of duly constituted purchase committee. The amounts
withdrawn from the banks will follow a systematic mechanism of obtaining the approval at various levels.
If any expenditure is made beyond budget sanction, ratification will be done in a special meeting.
Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of Departments
and relevant in-charges.
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information in public domain (5) A website with the address ‘www.anits.edu.in’ is available with total transparency of information including
circulars, AICTE Compliance Report, Mandatory Disclosure, events in the Institute, attendance, marks,
placements, exams and academic calendar etc.
169
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30) (25) Summary of current financial year’s budget and actual expenditure incurred (for the institution exclusively) in the three previous financial years.
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3
Table B.10.2a
Financial Year
Total Income (Rs.) Actual Expenditure (Rs.)
Total No. of
students Expenditure per student
(Rs.) Fee Govt. Grants (S) Other Sources
(specify)
Recurring including Salaries
Non - recurring
Special Projects/
Any other, specify
2018-19 39,82,02,148 - 12,57,500 25,24,88,474 3,86,20,479 - 4,433 65,668
2017-18 33,71,73,623 - 18,24,500 27,69,24,804 2,78,60,719 - 4,233 72,002
2016-17 31,18,25,364 - 13,50,000 21,45,11,205 2,22,76,503 - 3,780 62,642
2015-16 29,87,10,682 - 11,65,862 13,08,59,656 1,02,934 - 3,311
70,611
2014-15 23,74,11,998 - 21,02,452 11,22,32,044 8,69,21,120 - 2,907
68,508
170
Table B.10.2b
Items Budgeted in
CFY(2018-19)
Actual expenses in
CFY
Budgeted in CFYm1
(2017-18)
Actual Expenses in
CFYm1
Budgeted in CFYm2
(2016-17)
Actual Expenses in
CFYm2
Budgeted in CFYm3
(2015-16)
Actual Expenses in
CFdYm3
Infrastructure Built-Up
11,55,00,000 2,61,10,179 6,35,00,000 5,78,44,721 3,93,00,000 7,17,71,050 2,61,00,000 1,77,54,204
Library 4121071 537794 4146565 1433809 4171190 2726637 800000 2786011
Laboratory equipment
19947992 10270806 16816216 9023137 17125589 7877969 6000000 8424240
Laboratory consumables
3070846 2241801 2662870 1894988 3075272 1317969 2452000 1494838
Teaching and non-teaching staff salary
210477546 201852740 200191825 192649766 162533856 159976002 143880000 136609126
Maintenance and spares
5338568 10935999 15109723 24625104 27103900 22600032 21000000 24888104
R&D 2000000 4773419 2000000 1891464 1200000 1234609 1000000 1386448
Training and Travel 2453055 2737168 3347184 4443683 1660500 3553439 1595000 1733060
Miscellaneous expenses *
59713821 35770273 35598233 31713763 24981900 20506463 29318200 33480666
Total 422622899 295230179 343372616 325520435 281152206 291564169 232145200 228856697
171
10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)
Well ahead of the commencement of academic financial year, the Heads of the Departments
are directed to prepare their departmental budget. Accordingly the Heads of the
Departments shall consult their faculty members and lab in-charges; and in turn prepare
their departmental budget keeping in view their academic requirements.
Once the Departmental budgets are received from Heads of the Departments, the same
shall be consolidated and placed before the Board of Governors of the College for review and
recommendations. Once it’s recommended by the Board of Governors, the same is accepted
by the Management.
Since the budget is prepared by the user departments keeping in view their requirements,
the adequacy is justified.
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15) ANITS is a well established professional educational institution functioning over 18 years with
academic and financial discipline / excellence. Since the allocation is done based on the
actual requirements of the departments, the utilization is around 90%. The small variation of
utilization here and there may be on account of price variation and other relevant factors
prevailing at the time of actual procurement / utilization.
Albeit there is delay on receiving the funds from the govt., (because of non receipt of fee
reimbursement from the Government of Andhra Pradesh), for the past couple of years, we
are still ensuring that no academic interests are affected.
10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (5)
The audited statements are available on the institute’s website (www.anits.edu.in)
172
10.3. Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)
Table B.10.3a
For CFY (2018-19)
Total Budget: 7,80,000
Actual expenditure: 7,11,166
TotalNo.ofstudents:209 Utilization
Ratio Non-recurring
Recurring
Non Recurring
Recurring
Expenditure Per student
`7,00,000 80,000 6,85,808 25,358 3,402 91%
Note: All Figures in Rupees
For CFYm1 (2017-18)
Total Budget: 14,71,000
Actual expenditure: 12,63,966
Total No. of students: 212 Utilization
Ratio Non-recurring
Recurring
Non Recurring
Recurring
Expenditure Per student
13,46,000 1,25,000 12,16,369 47,597 5,962 86%
Note: All Figures in Rupees
Note: Similar tables are to be prepared for CFYm1, CFYm2 & CFYm3.
For CFYm2 (2016-17)
Total Budget: 13,95,000 Actual expenditure:12,66,429 Total No. of students: 210
Utilization
Ratio Non-recurring
Recurring
Non Recurring
Recurring Expenditure Per student
13,40,000 55,000 12,35,331 31,098 6,030 91%
Note: All Figures in Rupees
For CFYm3 (2015-16)
Total Budget: 26,30,000 Actual expenditure: 24,41,168 Total No. of students: 197 Utilization
Ratio Non-recurring
Recurring Non-Recurring Recurring Expenditure Per student
24,75,000 1,55,000 23,82,209 58,959 12,391 93%
Note: All Figures in Rupees
173
Table B.10.3b Items
Budgeted in
CFY 2018-19
Actual Expense
in CFY 2018-19
Budgeted in
CFYm1 2017-18
Actual Expenses inCFYm1 2017-18
Budgeted in CFYm2
2016-17
Actual Expenses in CFYm2 2016-17
Budgeted in CFYm3 2015-16
Actual Expenses in CFYm3 2015-16
Laboratory Equipment 6,30,000 6,32,350 65,000 35,000 12,00,000 11,01,321 18,35,000 17,60,080
Software - - 9,41,000 8,80,280 - - - -
Laboratory Consumable
30,000 25,358 45,000 29980 30,000 21,010 50,000 24,970
Maintenance and Spares 50,000 - 30,000 12,500 10,000 - - -
R&D - - - - - - -
Training and Travel
20,000 23,458 50,000 5117 15,000 10,088 1,05,000 33,989
Miscellaneous expenses*
50,000 30,000 3,40,000 3,01,089 1,40,000 1,34,010 6,40,000 6,22,129
Total 7,80,000 7,11,166 14,71,000 12,63,966 13,95,000 12,66,429 26,30,000 24,41,168
174
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10) (Program needs to justify that the budget allocated over the assessment years was adequate for the program)
Budget proposals with justification for each financial year are prepared generally in the month of
February of the preceding financial year based on the requirements raised by the laboratory in-
charges and faculty members of the department and discussion in the Department faculty meeting.
The proposal is submitted to Principal. Principal calls for an interaction meeting with the HoD to seek
clarifications if any. The proposal is then approved and the budget is sanctioned.
Adequacy of the budget allocated is justified as 1) Quality equipment is purchased from the
quotation, which is more often not the lowest 2) the department is able to establish i) its own
premises by 2015-16 ii) Air-conditioned computer centre with 45 desktop computers and UPS ii) A/c
seminar hall with public address system 3) licensed software such as STAAD Pro and ArcGIS have also
been procured.
10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds (20) (Program needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three assessment years)
The allocated funds are utilized fully by the Department by procuring all the non-consumables and
consumables. The gap between the sanctioned and utilized budget largely arises because the actual
price of the non-consumables is not exactly known at the time of submitting the budget proposal
and a higher amount is thus proposed.
10.4 Library and Internet (20)
AICTE has given Zero-deficiency report for all the Assessment years for which the program has
applied.
10.4.1 Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) (10)
(a) General information about central library:
Carpet area of library (in m2) : 1200 sq.mt.
Reading space (in m2) : 800 sq.mt.
Number of seats in reading space : 200
Number of users (issue book) per day : 450 per day
Number of users (reading space) per day : 200 per day
Timings:
During working day : 08:00 am to 07:00 pm
Weekend : (Sunday Closed)
Vacation : 08:00 am to 04:00 pm
Number of library staff : 7
Number of library staff with a degree in
Library Management : 5
Computerization for search, indexing,
issue/return records : Yes
Bar coding used : Yes
Library services on Internet/Intranet : Yes
INDEST or other similar membership archives : Yes
175
(b) Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources Titles and volumes per title Number of titles : 8435
Number of volumes : 38953
Year Number of New Titles
added Number of new editions
added Number of new volumes
added
CFYm3 (2015-16) 63 33 1438
CFYm2 (2016-17) 61 37 1431
CFYm1 (2017-18) 80 41 1945
CFY (2018-19) 86 20 808
Scholarly journal subscription
Details CFYm3
(2015-16) CFY m2
(2016-17) CFY m1
(2017-18) CFY
(2018-19)
Engg & Tech.
As Softy Copy 664 656 ---
IEEE, ASME, ASCE, ELSEVIER, J-GATE, DELNET Total: 507
As Hard Copy 96 81 --- Journals: 69 Magazines: 22 Total: 91
Accessibility to students and support to students for self-learning activities
Availability of digital library content If available : Yes Number of courses : 350 Number of e books : 755 Availability of an exclusive server : Yes Availability over Intranet/Internet : Yes Availability of exclusive space/room : Yes Number of users per day : 60 per day
10.4.2 Internet (10)
Band Width and service provider: 100 mbps (1:1) Leased line, Internet provider : Swiftmail Wi-Fi availability : Yes Internet access in labs, classrooms, library and offices of all Departments : Yes Security arrangements : Yes
178
Annexure-1
Program Outcomes (POs)
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
3. Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
9. Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
10. Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
11. Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
12. Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs)
1. Civil Engineering Knowledge: Analyse & design solutions to complex problems by applying
fundamentals of sciences and civil engineering in one or more of its major areas such as
structural, geo-technical, water resources, transportation and environmental engineering.
2. Conduct investigations of complex civil engineering problems: Use modern techniques and
tools to design and conduct experiments, prepare and interpret plans and reports with valid
conclusions and recommendations.
3. Civil engineer and society: Develop civil engineering solutions based on societal, health,
safety, legal, cultural and environmental considerations for sustainable development.
188
Annexure-8 Table 3.2.2 Record of Course Outcome Attainment
CAY 2018-19
Course CO
Attainment
CIV111 English
CIV111.1 1.6
CIV111.2 1.6
CIV111.3 2
CIV111.4 1.3
CIV111.5 1.6
CIV112 Engineering
Mathematics – I
CIV112.1 1.3
CIV112.2 1
CIV112.3 1.7
CIV112.4 0.4
CIV112.5 1.4
CIV113 Engineering Physics
CIV113.1 0.4
CIV113.2 1.3
CIV113.3 0.7
CIV113.4 1.3
CIV113.5 1.7
CIV114 Engineering Drawing
CIV114.1 1.6
CIV114.2 1
CIV114.3 1
Course CO
Attainment
CIV114.4 0.7
CIV114.5 0.7
CIV115 Environmental Sciences
CIV115.1 2.6
CIV115.2 1.6
CIV115.3 2.2
CIV115.4 2
CIV115.5 1.6
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab
CIV116.1 2.6
CIV116.2 2.6
CIV117 Programming With C Lab
CIV117.1 1.8
CIV117.2 2.6
CIV117.3 2.6
CIV117.4 1.8
CIV118 Workshop
CIV118.1 2.6
CIV118.2 2.6
CIV118.3 2.6
CIV118.4 3
CIV121 Engineering
Mathematics-II
189
Course CO
Attainment
CIV121.1 1.9
CIV121.2 1.7
CIV121.3 0.7
CIV121.4 0.7
CIV121.5 0.4
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry
CIV122.1 1
CIV122.2 1
CIV122.3 1
CIV122.4 1
CIV122.5 1
CIV122.6 0.4
CIV123 Professional Ethics And
Human Values
CIV123.1 2
CIV123.2 1
CIV123.3 1.0
CIV123.4 2
CIV123.5 2
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil
Engineers
CIV124.1 1.3
CIV124.2 0.7
CIV124.3 1.3
CIV124.4 1.6
CIV124.5 1
Course CO
Attainment
CIV125 Civil Engineering
Materials
CIV125.1 1
CIV125.2 0.9
CIV125.3 0
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry
Lab
CIV126.1 2.6
CIV126.2 2.6
CIV127 Language Lab
CIV127.1 1.6
CIV127.2 2
CIV127.3 1.6
CIV127.4 2
CIV211 Engineering
Mathematics-III
CIV211.1 3
CIV211.2 0.4
CIV211.3 2
CIV211.4 0.4
CIV211.5 0
CIV212 Building Technology
CIV212.1 3
CIV212.2 3
CIV212.3 1.8
CIV212.4 1.2
190
Course CO
Attainment
CIV212.5 3
CIV212.6 3
CIV213 Engineering Geology
CIV213.1 0.6
CIV213.2 2.4
CIV213.3 1.6
CIV213.4 2
CIV213.5 1
CIV214 Engineering Mechanics
CIV214.1 1.4
CIV214.2 2.6
CIV214.3 2.2
CIV214.4 3
CIV214.5 1.2
CIV215 Surveying– I
CIV215.1 0.8
CIV215.2 1.4
CIV215.3 2
CIV215.4 1
CIV215.5 1.8
CIV216 Strength of Materials
CIV216.1 0
CIV216.2 0
CIV216.3 0
CIV216.4 0
Course CO
Attainment
CIV216.5 0
CIV217 Surveying Field Work-I
CIV217.1 3
CIV217.2 3
CIV217.3 3
CIV217.4 3
CIV217.5 3
CIV218 Strength of Materials Lab
CIV218.1 2.6
CIV218.2 2.6
CIV221 Concrete Technology
CIV221.1 0.8
CIV221.2 0.4
CIV221.3 0.8
CIV221.4 0.4
CIV221.5 1
CIV222 Environmental
Engineering-I
CIV222.1 1
CIV222.2 0.4
CIV222.3 0.8
CIV222.4 2
CIV223 Fluid Mechanics-I
CIV223.1 0
CIV223.2 0
191
Course CO
Attainment
CIV223.3 0
CIV223.4 0.6
CIV224 Surveying – II
CIV224.1 3
CIV224.2 0.4
CIV224.3 0.8
CIV224.4 1
CIV224.5 1.4
CIV224.6 1.4
CIV225 Structural Analysis – I
CIV225.1 1.2
CIV225.2 0.4
CIV225.3 0.8
CIV225.4 1
CIV225.5 1
CIV225.6 0
CIV226 Building Planning &
Drawing
CIV226.1 1
CIV226.2 1.8
CIV226.3 1.4
CIV226.4 1.8
CIV226.5 1
CIV226.6 1
CIV227 Concrete Technology Lab
Course CO
Attainment
CIV227.1 3
CIV227.2 3
CIV228 Fluid Mechanics Lab-I
CIV228.1 3
CIV228.2 3
CIV229 Surveying Field Work –II
CIV229.1 3
CIV229.2 3
CIV229.3 3
CIV312 Environmental
Engineering-II
CIV312.1 2.4
CIV312.2 2.4
CIV312.3 1.2
CIV312.4 1.2
CIV313 Reinforced Concrete
Structures-I
CIV313.1 1.8
CIV313.2 1.8
CIV313.3 1.8
CIV313.4 1.8
CIV313.5 1.4
CIV314 Structural Analysis – II
CIV314.1 1.8
CIV314.2 0.6
CIV314.3 1.8
192
Course CO
Attainment
CIV314.4 1.8
CIV314.5 3
CIV315 Fluid Mechanics-II
CIV315.1 1.2
CIV315.2 0.4
CIV315.3 0.8
CIV315.4 0.4
CIV316 Geotechnical
Engineering – I
CIV316.1 1.8
CIV316.2 1.2
CIV316.3 3
CIV316.4 3
CIV316.5 1.2
CIV317 Geotechnical
Engineering Lab-I
CIV317.1 3
CIV317.2 3
CIV318 Environmental
Engineering Lab
CIV318.1 3
CIV318.2 3
CIV319 Fluid Mechanics Lab-II
CIV319.1 3
CIV319.2 3
CIV3110 Quantitative & Verbal
Course CO
Attainment
Aptitude -I
CIV3110.1 2
CIV3110.2 2
CIV3110.3 2
CIV3110.4 2
CIV3110.5 2
CIV3110.6 2
CIV3110.7 2
CIV3110.8 2
CIV3111 Technical Seminar
CIV3111.1 2
CIV3111.2 2
CIV3111.3 2
CIV3111.4 2
CIV3111.5 2
CIV321 Reinforced Concrete
Structures-II
CIV321.1 3
CIV321.2 3
CIV321.3 3
CIV321.4 2
CIV321.5 3
CIV322 Estimation & Costing
CIV322.1 2.6
CIV322.2 2.6
193
Course CO
Attainment
CIV322.3 2
CIV323 Geotechnical
Engineering – II
CIV323.1 2.4
CIV323.2 3
CIV323.3 1.2
CIV323.4 2.6
CIV323.5 1.8
CIV324 Transportation
Engineering-I
CIV324.1 1.8
CIV324.2 0.8
CIV324.3 0.8
CIV324.4 0.8
CIV324.5 1.2
CIV325 Water Resources
Engineering – I
CIV325.1 1.2
CIV325.2 1.4
CIV325.3 1.6
CIV325.4 2.4
CIV325.5 2.6
CIV327 Geotechnical
Engineering Lab-II
CIV327.1 3
CIV327.2 3
CIV328 Computer Applications in
Course CO
Attainment
Civil Engineering Lab-I
CIV328.1 3
CIV328.2 3
CIV328.3 3
CIV329 Quantitative & Verbal
Aptitude –II
CIV329.1 2
CIV329.2 2
CIV329.3 2
CIV329.4 2
CIV329.5 2
CIV329.6 2
CIV329.7 2
CIV329.8 2
CIV3210 Soft Skills Lab
CIV3210.1 3
CIV3210.2 3
CIV3210.3 3
CIV3210.4 3
CIV3210.5 3
CIV411 Open Elective-I (Nano
Technology)
CIV411.1 2.4
CIV411.2 3
CIV411.3 3
CIV411.4 3
194
Course CO
Attainment
CIV411.5 3
CIV412 Professional Elective - II
(Air Pollution & control)
CIV412.1 3
CIV412.2 2.4
CIV412.3 3
CIV412.4 3
CIV413 Project Planning &
Management
CIV413.1 1.8
CIV413.2 1.8
CIV413.3 3
CIV414 Steel Structures
CIV414.1 2.2
CIV414.2 0.8
CIV414.3 1.4
CIV414.4 1.2
CIV415 Water Resources
Engineering - II
AIV415.1 1.8
AIV415.2 1.2
AIV415.3 1
AIV415.4 1.4
AIV415.5 1.2
CIV416 Transportation
Engineering-II
Course CO
Attainment
CIV416.1 2.6
CIV416.2 3
CIV416.3 2.6
CIV416.4 2.4
CIV416.5 2.4
CIV417 Computer Applications
in Civil Engineering Lab-II
CIV417.1 3
CIV417.2 3
CIV417.3 3
CIV417.4 3
CIV418 Transportation
Engineering Lab
CIV418.1 3
CIV418.2 3
CIV418.3 3
CIV419 Project work-I
CIV419.1 3
CIV419.2 3
CIV419.3 3
CIV419.4 3
CIV4110 Industrial Training
CIV4110.1 2
CIV4110.2 2
CIV4110.3 2
CIV4110.4 2
195
Course CO
Attainment
CIV4110.5 2
CIV 421(D) Professional Elective
– III (Ground Improvement
Techniques)
CIV422.1 3
CIV422.2 2.4
CIV422.3 1.8
CIV422.4 2.4
CIV422.5 1.2
CIV423 Engineering Economics &
Finance
BIV423.1 3
BIV423.2 3
Course CO
Attainment
CIV424 Irrigation Structures
Design & Drawing
CIV424.1 3
CIV424.2 3
CIV424.3 3
CIV424.4 3
CIV424.5 3
CIV426 Project Work - II
CIV426.1 3
CIV426.2 3
CIV426.3 3
CIV426.4 3
199
ANNEXURE 12
TABLE B.5 FACULTY INFORMATION
CAY 2018-19
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
1 B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Ph. D A.U 1998 6 Professor
& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 6.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunct
3 A Santha Ram Ph. D NIT-
Nagpur 2010 0.7 Professor 03-10-2018 03-10-2018 Civil Engg. Mining - - -
NO
(01-01-2019) Adjunct
4 J. Vikranth M.E A.U 2003 6.10 Assistant
Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
5 M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya M.E GITAM 2009 4.11 Assistant
Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - - YES Regular
6 T. Kiran Kumar M.Tech NIT-W 2014 4.11 Assistant
Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE - - - YES Regular
7 P.V.R. Sravya M.E A.U. 2014 4.10 Assistant
Professor - 30.07.2014 Civil Engg. EE 3 - - YES Regular
8 Ch. Vineel M.E A.U. 2014 4.7 Assistant
Professor - 21.10.2014 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
9 T. Venkata Viswa Teja M.E A.U. 2014 4.6 Assistant
Professor - 28.11.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
10 P. Vandana Rao M.Tech A.U. 2015 2.10 Assistant
Professor - 01.07.2016 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
11 M.Premchand M.Tech NIT-RKL 2016 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. WRE - - - YES Regular
200
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
12 Ch. Srinivas M.Tech GITAM 2015 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - - YES Regular
13 K.Suryanarayana M.Tech NIT-T 2011 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 12-06-2017 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
14 J.Harshavardhan Reddy M.Tech SVNIT 2017 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 17-06-2017 Civil Engg. EE - - - YES Regular
15 M.Nagalakshmi M.Tech A.U. 2017 1.9 Assistant
Professor - 03-08-2017 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
16 P.V.R.K Reddy M.Tech A.U. 2012 0.11 Assistant
Professor - 01-06-2018 Civil Engg Structural - - - YES Regular
Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; Mining: Mining Engineering; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster
Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering
201
Annexure-12 TABLE B.5
CAYm1 (2017-18)
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
1 B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Ph. D A.U 1998 5 Professor
& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 5.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunc
t
3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 5.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunc
t
4 J. Vikranth M.E A.U 2003 5.10 Assistant
Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural 2 - - YES Regular
5 M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya M.E GITAM 2009 3.11 Assistant
Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 1 - - YES Regular
6 T. Kiran Kumar M.Tech NIT-W 2014 3.11 Assistant
Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE 1 - - YES Regular
7 P.V.R. Sravya M.E A.U. 2014 3.10 Assistant
Professor - 30.07.2014 Civil Engg. EE 1 - - YES Regular
8 Ch. Vineel M.E A.U. 2014 3.7 Assistant
Professor - 21.10.2014 Civil Engg. Soil 2 - - YES Regular
9 T. Venkata Viswa Teja M.E A.U. 2014 3.6 Assistant
Professor - 28.11.2014 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
10 B. Ramana Raja M.Tech IIT-
KGP 2011 3.4
Assistant
Professor - 07.01.2015 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
11 P. Vandana Rao M.Tech A.U. 2015 1.10 Assistant
Professor - 01.07.2016 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
202
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
12 M.Premchand M.Tech NIT-
RKL 2016 0.11
Assistant
Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. WRE 1 - - YES Regular
13 Ch. Srinivas M.Tech GITAM 2015 0.11 Assistant
Professor - 01-06-2017 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 2 - - YES Regular
14 K.Suryanarayana M.Tech NIT-T 2011 0.11 Assistant
Professor - 12-06-2017 Civil Engg. Structural 1 - - YES Regular
15 J.Harshavardhan Reddy M.Tech SVNIT 2017 0.11 Assistant
Professor - 17-06-2017 Civil Engg. EE 1 - - YES Regular
16 M.Nagalakshmi M.Tech A.U. 2017 0.9 Assistant
Professor - 03-08-2017 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; RSGIS: Remote Sensing and GIS; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster
Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering
203
Annexure-12 TABLE B.5
CAYm2 (2016-17)
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
1 B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Ph. D A.U 1998 4 Professor
& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil 2 - - YES Regular
2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 4.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunct
3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 4.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunct
4 J. Vikranth M.E A.U 2003 4.10 Assistant
Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural 1 - - YES Regular
5 M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya M.E GITAM 2009 2.11 Assistant
Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 1 - - YES Regular
6 T. Kiran Kumar M.Tech NIT-W 2014 2.11 Assistant
Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE 1 - - YES Regular
7 P.V.R. Sravya M.E A.U. 2014 2.10 Assistant
Professor - 30.07.2014 Civil Engg. EE 3 - - YES Regular
8 Ch. Vineel M.E A.U. 2014 2.7 Assistant
Professor - 21.10.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
9 T. Venkata Viswa Teja M.E A.U. 2014 2.6 Assistant
Professor - 28.11.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
10 B. Ramana Raja M.Tech IIT-
KGP 2011 2.4
Assistant
Professor - 07.01.2015 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
204
S.
No. N
ame
of
Facu
lty
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
11 A. Vamsi Krishna M.Tech NIT-
RKL 2016 0.11
Assistant
Professor - 13.06.2016 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
12 V. Leela Manusha M.Tech NIT-
RKL 2016 0.11
Assistant
Professor - 13.06.2016 Civil Engg. TE - - - YES Regular
13 D. Sindhuja M.Tech NIT-
RKL 2016 0.11
Assistant
Professor - 13.06.2016 Civil Engg. GTE - - - YES Regular
14 P. Vandana Rao M.Tech A.U. 2015 0.10 Assistant
Professor - 01.07.2016 Civil Engg. Soil 1 - - YES Regular
Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; RSGIS: Remote Sensing and GIS; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster
Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering; GTE: Geotechnical Engineering
205
Annexure-12 TABLE B.5
CAYm3 (2015-16)
S.
No. N
ame
of
Facu
lty
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
1 B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Ph. D A.U 1998 3 Professor
& HOD 27.05.2013 27.05.2013 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
2 A. Rama Mohan Rao M E A.U 1975 3.10 Professor 02.07.2012 02.07.2012 Civil Engg. Marine - - - YES Adjunct
3 V. Venkateswara Rao Ph. D A.U 1984 3.11 Professor 06.06.2012 06.06.2012 Civil Engg. RSGIS - - - YES Adjunct
4 V. Viswanadham Ph. D A.U 1983 1 Professor 19-05-2015 19-05-2015 Civil Engg. EE - - - NO
(27-02-2016) Contract
5 J. Vikranth M.E A.U 2003 3.10 Assistant
Professor - 07.06.2012 Civil Engg. Structural 1 - - YES Regular
6 K.Lovaraju M.Tech GITAM 2014 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 04-06-2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM - - -
NO
(18-12-2015) Regular
7 K. Mukesh Kumar M.Tech JNTUK 2015 0.3 Assistant
Professor - 01-01-2016 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
8 M.K.S.S. Krishna Chaitanya M.E GITAM 2009 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 09.06.2014 Civil Engg. SE&NDM 2 - - YES Regular
9 T. Kiran Kumar M.Tech NIT-W 2014 1.11 Assistant
Professor - 14.06.2014 Civil Engg. TE 1 - - YES Regular
206
S.
No.
Nam
e o
f Fa
cult
y
Me
mbe
r
Qualification
Ass
oci
atio
n w
ith
Inst
itu
tio
n(Ye
ars)
De
sign
atio
n
Dat
e o
n w
hic
h
De
sign
ate
d a
s
Ass
oci
ate
Pro
fess
or/
Pro
fess
or
Dat
e o
f Jo
inin
g
De
par
tme
nt
Spe
cial
izat
ion
Academic Research
Cu
rre
ntl
y A
sso
ciat
ed
(Y
/N)
Dat
e o
f le
avin
g (I
n c
ase
Cu
rren
tly
asso
ciat
ed is
“N
O”
)
Nat
ure
of
Ass
oci
atio
n
De
gre
e(H
ighe
st
De
gre
e)
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ye
ar a
ttai
nin
g
Hig
he
r
Qu
alif
icat
ion
Re
sear
ch p
ape
r
Pu
bli
cati
on
Ph
.D. G
uid
ance
Facu
lty
rece
ivin
g
Ph
.D. d
uri
ng
the
Ass
ess
me
nt
Year
10 P.V.R. Sravya M.E A.U. 2014 1.10 Assistant
Professor - 30.07.2014 Civil Engg. EE 2 - - YES Regular
11 Ch. Vineel M.E A.U. 2014 1.7 Assistant
Professor - 21.10.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
12 V.Sreelakshmi M.E A.U. 2014 1.6 Assistant
Professor 24-11-2014 Civil Engg. EE - - - YES Regular
13 T. Venkata Viswa Teja M.E A.U. 2014 1.6 Assistant
Professor - 28.11.2014 Civil Engg. Soil - - - YES Regular
14 B. Ramana Raja M.Tech IIT-
KGP 2011 1.4
Assistant
Professor - 07.01.2015 Civil Engg. Structural - - - YES Regular
15 B.G.Rajeev Gandhi M.Tech IIT-G 2011 0.9 Assistant
Professor 13-08-2015 Civil Engg. WRE - - - YES Regular
Soil: Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; Marine: Marine Structures; RSGIS: Remote Sensing and GIS; Structural: Structural Engineering; S&NDM: Structural Engineering & Natural Disaster
Management; TE: Transportation Engineering; EE: Environmental Engineering; WRE: Water Resource Engineering
207
Annexure-13
Faculty publications
(CAY 2018-19)
S.No. Name of the
author
Title of
the paper
Name of the
journal
Month
and Year of
Issue
International
Database in listed
Impact
Factor
1 Dr. B.N.D. Narasinga Rao Use of Parwada Fly Ash as substitute to soil in Embankments and Subgrade
International Journal of Management, Technology and
Engineering
April 2019 UGC Approved 6.3
2 MKSSK Chaitanya A Comparative Study on Flexural Strength of Steel Binding Wire and Jute Fibers in concrete over ordinary Concrete
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
May 2019 UGC Approved 5.87
3 MKSSK Chaitanya Comparative Study of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Building of 40km wide
Industrial Shed
International Journal of
Management Technology and Engineering
May 2019 UGC Approved 6.3
4 P.V.R.Sravya A Study of Assessment of Ground Water Quality
at Certain Industrial Zones in Visakhapatnam AP
Water Resource &
Environmental Engineering I
September
2018
Springer -
5 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of River Water Quality-A study of River Godavari in AP
Water Resource & Environmental Engineering II
September 2018
Springer -
6 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Godavari River at Polavaram of Irrigation Purpose
Water Resource & Environmental Engineering II
September 2018
Springer -
7 Ch.Vineel Strength comparison between normally cured
and accelerated cured concrete with partial replacement of sand with pond ash
Journal of Emerging
Technologies and innovative research
September
2018
UGC Approved 5.87
208
S.No. Name of the author
Title of the paper
Name of the journal
Month and Year
of Issue
International Database in
listed
Impact Factor
8 T.V.Viswa Teja A Study on Establishment of Domestic Wind
Turbines At ANITS Campus
International
Journal of Management, Technology And
Engineering
March 2019 UGC Approved 6.3
9 T.V.Viswa Teja A Comparative Study on Compressive and
Flexural Strength of Fiber Reinforced Concrete and Ordinary Concrete
Journal of Emerging
Technologies and Innovative Research
April 2019 UGC Approved 5.87
10 P. Vandana Rao Analysis on Response of Square Footing on sloping Terrain using PLAXIS 2D
Journal of Emerging Technologies and
Innovative Research
June 2019 UGC Approved 5.87
11 M. Premchand 2D Flow Simulation for the upstream side of Nagarjuna Sagar Reservoir using HEC-RAS
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
May 2019 UGC Approved 5.87
12 Ch. Srinivas Experimental Study on Compressive Strength of
Concrete by Partially Replacing Cement with Micro Silica
International
Journal of Management Technology and
Engineering
March 2019 UGC Approved 6.3
13 Ch. Srinivas Study on Investigation of Micro Silica as Partial
Replacement of Cement in Concrete
International
Journal of Applied Engineering Research
May 2019 UGC Approved 5.75
14 J Harshavardhan Reddy Geosynthetics- A modern Civil Engineering
Construction Material
International
Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews
June 2019 UGC Approved 5.75
15 PVRK Reddy Application of the Affine theorem to a two way rectangular orthotropic slab with one long side
discontinuous and simply supported on other three sides having an interior corner opening
Universal Review Journal
May 2019 UGC Approved 5.7
209
Faculty publications
(CAYm1 2017-18)
S. No.
Name of the Author
Title of the paper
Name of the journal
Month and Year
International Database listed
Impact Factor
1 Dr.BND. Narasinga Rao
Geotechnical Properties of Parawada Fly ash and Thagarapuvalasa soil
Mixtures for Use in Highway
Embankments
International Journal of Basic and Applied Research
June-2018 Google Scholar 5.86
2 J.Vikranth Application of the Affine Theorem to an Orthotropic Rectangular
Reinforced Concrete Slab Having a
interior Corner Opening
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
Sep-2017 Google Scholar 2.85
3 J.Vikranth Application of the affine theorem to
an orthotropic rectangular reinforced concrete slab continuous over one long side and simply supported on
other three sides having an interior corner opening
International journal of Advanced in
Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Approved 6.3
4 MKSSK Chaitanya Comparative Study of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Building
International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &
Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Approved 6.3
5 T.Kiran Kumar A Study on Effective Use of Plastic
Waste in Flexible Pavements
International journal of Advanced in
Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Approved 6.3
6 P.V.R.Sravya Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Godavari River Water Quality for
Irrigation
Purpose at Rajahmundry & Dhawaleswaram
International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and
Infrastructural Engineering
Research and Development
October 2017
Google Scholar 7.9
7 Ch.Vineel Evaluation of Crusher Dust as Replacement of Filler in Concrete
IOSR Journal of Engineering September 2017
UGC Approved 1.645
8 Ch.Vineel Appraisal of Rock Flour as Frictional Fill Material for use in Reinforced
Earth Structures
SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering
March 2018 Google Scholar 2.21
210
S. No.
Name of the Author
Title of the paper
Name of the journal
Month and Year
International Database listed
Impact Factor
9 T.V.ViswaTeja Planning and Design of Net-Zero
Energy Residential Building(NZERB)
International journal of Advanced in
Management, Technology & Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Approved 6.3
10 P.Vandana Rao A Parametric Study on Black Cotton Soil Stabilized Using Rice Husk Ash
International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &
Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Approved 6.3
11 M.Premchand Rooftop Rain Water Harvesting
Technique for ANITS Campus
Journal of Emerging Technologies
and Innovative Research
May 2018 UGC Approved 5.87
12 Ch.Srinivas Experimental Study on mechanical properties of concrete by partially
replacing cement with GGBS and fine aggregate with copper slag
International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &
Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3
13 Ch.Srinivas Experimental study of Copper slag on
mechanical properties of concrete
International journal of Applied
Engineering Research
April 2018 UGC Approved
14 K. Suryanarayana Study on Glass Fiber Reinforced Fly Ash Concrete
International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &
Engineering Sciences
April 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3
15 J. Harsha Vardhana Reddy
A Review on integrated Solid Waste Management in Visakhapatnam City
International journal of Advanced in Management, Technology &
Engineering Sciences
May 2018 UGC Aprovved 6.3
16
M.Nagalakshmi Effect of shape of Footing on Coefficient of elastic uniform
compression of fine sand
Indian Geotechnical Conference 2017, GeoNEst
December 2017
-- --
211
Faculty publications
(CAYm2 2016-17)
S. No.
Name of the author
Title of the paper
Name of the journal
Month and Year
International Database listed
Impact Factor
1 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga
Rao
Properties Of Parawada Fly Ash
Concrete
International Journal of Advances In
Civil And Structural Engineering, Mantech Publications
Vol. 1, Issue
3, 2016
Google Scholar
Index Copernicus -
2 Dr.B.N.D. Narasinga Rao
Use of Parawada Fly Ash in Concrete as Partial Replacement of Cement
International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Re search IJETSR
May 2017 Google Scholar 2.12
3 J.Vikranth A Study on use of Plastic Waste (Polypropylene) in Flexible Pavements
International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
May – June 2017
Google Scholar 3.105
4 MKSSK Chaitanya
Experimental Study On Mechanical &
Durability Properties Of Conventional Concrete As A Partial Replacement Of Iron Ore With & Without Use Of Glass
Fibres
International Journal of Research in Science & Technology
Dec -2016 Index Copernicus 1.92
5 P.V.R.Sravya An Experimental Study on parametric variations during composting of
Municipal Solid Waste
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and
Technology
Oct-2016 Cite factor 1.0
6 T.Kiran Kumar A Study on use of Plastic Waste
(Polypropylene) in Flexible Pavements
International Journal of Engineering and Management
Research
May – June
2017
Google Scholars
3.105
7 P. Vandana Rao Study on Strength Characteristics of Pond ash Replaced Fine aggregate in Pavement Quality Control
International Journal of Engineering and Management Research
May – June 2017
Google Scholars
3.105
212
Annexure-14 Performance Appraisal Format
SELF APPRAISAL FORM FOR TEACHING STAFF
(To be filled up by the faculty member)
1. Name :
2. Present Designation :
3. Department :
4. Date of Joining – Service in this college & Designation :
5. Date of elevation to the present position:
6. Highest Academic Qualification:
7. Experience (Teaching / Industry/ Research)
(a) At ANITS _______________ Years _____________
Months
(b) Elsewhere Experience: Teaching:_______________ Years _____________
Months
Industry / Research: _______________ Years _____________
Months
________________________________________________________________
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
01.Teaching, Learning And Evaluation Related Activities:
1.1 Work Load:
S No
Year /Semester Teaching Load (Max: 20M)
Work load % Score (Self) Score (HOD)
1
2
Average
213
1.2 & 1.3 Student feedback & Pass percentage:
S.No. Year / Semester
Course Student Feedback (Max: 25M)
Pass percentage (Max: 25M)
% Score
(Self)
Score
(HOD)
% Score
(Self)
Score
(HOD)
Average Average
2. Co-Curricular, Extension and Professional Development
S.No
Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)
Score (HOD)
2.1 Co-curricular Activities (Max: 5M)
2.2 Professional Development Activities (Max: 10M)
2.3 Department Administration (Max: 15M)
-
S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score
(Self)
Score
(HOD) 1.4 Preparation of study
material / resources (Max: 10M)
1.5 Innovative / student centric teaching- learning methods (Max: 10M)
1.6 Curriculum preparation and examination related work (Max: 10M)
214
S.No
Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)
Score (HOD)
2.4 (a) (b)
Mentoring of students Guidance in course work (Max: 5M) Career guidance, Training etc.. (Max: 5M)
3. Research and Academic Contributions
S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score
(Self)
Score
(HOD) 3.1 Research Papers
Published
3.2 Publications (Books, Chapters in books
other than journals)
3.3 Research Projects
3.4 Research Guidance
3.5 Consultancy
3.6 Participation or Presentation in Training courses/ Conference/ Seminars/ Workshops
3.7 Training Courses/ Conference/ Seminar/ Workshop Organized
215
S.No Indicators Details of Activities Score (Self)
Score (HOD)
3.8 Awards/ Honors/ Recognitions
S No Category Score (Self) Score (HOD)
1 Teaching, Learning And Evaluation Related Activities (Total of 1.1 to 1.6 above)
2 Co-Curricular, Extension And Professional Development
Related Activities. (Total of 2.1 to 2.4 above)
3 Research And Academic Contributions ( Total of 3.1 to 3.8 above)
The above information is true to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of the faculty member
Signature of HoD
To be filled in by the Office:
1. Date of Joining ANITS :
2. Present Emoluments & Scale :
3. Due date of increment :
4. Score assessed by the Principal :
Signature of Principal
216
PROFORMA FOR SANCTION OF ANNUAL INCREMENT / SCALE
1. Name of the faculty member : 2. Designation : 3. Department : 4. Academic Qualification : 5. Date of Joining : 6. Due date of Increment : 7. Teaching Experience : a) in ANITS b) Else Where 8. Subjects Taught : 9. Whether in Scale / Consolidated : 10. Any other useful information : Specific remarks of the Head of the Department Signature of HoD
To be filled in by the Office:
Present After increment
Basic
DA
HRA
Others
Total
Director (Admn)
Recommendations of Principal Signature of Principal
Approval Signature of Secretary & Correspondent
217
Annexure-15 Academic Audit Format
IQAC
DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDEX-ANITS (DPI-A)
Modified w.e.f. 2018-19
1. Teaching – Learning Processes : 250
2. Student’s Performance : 200
3. Faculty contributions : 275
4. Co-curricular activities : 100
5. Students support systems : 100
6. Continuous improvement : 50
7. Best Practices : 25
Total : 1000
____________________________________________________________________________
1. Teaching Learning Processes: (Max – 250)
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
1.1 Initiative for improvement of quality in teaching and learning (50)
1.1.1 Availability of Academic Calendar of the department based
on Institute’s academic calendar and its effective
compliance / implementation and adherence to schedule
5
1.1.2 Implementation of pedagogical initiatives such as real life
examples, collaborative learning, ICT supported learning,
interactive class rooms etc.
10
1.1.3 Guidelines to identify weak and bright students (3M); post
identification actions taken (3M); impact observed and
recorded (4M)
10
1.1.4 Class room ambience; efforts to keep students engaged 5
1.1.5 Quality of laboratory experience with respect to
conducting, recording observations (5M); Evaluation
process (5M)
10
1.1.6 Feedback analysis and actions taken ( CRC/ Student feed
back) (5M); Impact of action recorded (5M)
10
1.2 Quality of end semester examination, internal semester question papers, assignments and
evaluation (25)
1.2.1 Process of internal semester question paper setting,
scheme of evaluation and its compliance
5
1.2.2 Question paper validation to ensure desired standard from
outcome attainment perspective as well as learning levels
perspective
5
1.2.3 Mapping of questions with the Course outcomes 5
218
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
1.2.4 Assignments to promote self-learning, survey of contents
from multiple sources, assignment evaluation and feedback
to the students, mapping with the COs
10
1.3 Quality of student projects (25)
1.3.1 Guide allocation and Projects identification strategies 5
1.3.2 Continuous monitoring mechanism and evaluation (5M),
Methodology(Appropriately documented) to assess
individual contribution/understanding of the project as well
as collective contribution/understanding {Process to assess
individual and team performance}(5M)
10
1.3.3 Projects classification (application, product, research,
review etc.) consideration to factors such as environment,
safety, ethics, cost, standards and mapping with program
outcomes and program specific outcomes
5
1.3.4 Quality of journal where the paper has been published
/quality of competition in which award has been won for
the projects
5
1.4 Industry related interaction (30)
1.4.1 Industry supported laboratories 5
1.4.2 Industry involvement in the program design and
Curriculum.
5
1.4.3 Industry involvement in partial delivery of any regular
courses for students
5
1.4.4 Impact analysis of industry institute interaction and actions
taken thereof
5
1.4.5 Industrial /internship /summer training of more than two
weeks and post training Assessment
5
1.4.6 Impact analysis of industrial training 5
1.5 Factors related to Outcome based education (85)
1.5.1 Explanation of Articulation matrix for CO s and POs and
also fixing proper attainment levels of PO, PSO and PEO
assessment.
5
1.5.2 Coverage and quality of all direct and indirect assessment
tools for POs and PSOs (Such as COs, projects, placements,
higher education etc., for direct assessment and recruiter,
alumni, employer, parents etc., for indirect assessment).
Reasonable sample size is critical for each tool
10
1.5.3 Updating the data of CO / PO/PSO assessment in a time
bound manner and action / measures taken and impact
15
1.5.4 Initiatives for student awareness on OBE (5M) and
verification of student awareness i.e. impact analysis (10M)
15
1.5.5 CO attainment tools based on internal exam evaluation(10)
+ external examination (30) {Based on assessment on
performance of students question wise in both cases}
40
1.6 Laboratory facilities (35)
219
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
1.6.1 Maintenance and overall ambience (to check physically
whether the equipment is working)
10
1.6.2 Safety initiatives in laboratories 10
1.6.3 Facilities (additional equipment) created for improving the
quality of learning
15
2. Student Performance: (Max-200)
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
2.1 Success rate(90)
2.1.1
a) Success rate of students who cleared programme
without backlogs in any year of study including lateral
entry=20×(Students graduated / Students admitted)
20
b) Improvement in success rate from previous years 5
2.1.2 a) Success rate in any year of study including lateral
entry=15×(Students graduated / Students admitted)
15
b) Improvement in success rate from previous years 5
2.1.3 Academic Performance in Third Year
Academic Performance = 1.5 * API (Academic
Performance Index)
API = (3rd Year Grade Point Average of all successful
Students on a 10 point scale X number of successful
students)/number of students appeared in the
examination)
15
2.1.4 Academic Performance in Second Year {Same as
above formula in 2.1.3}
15
2.1.5 Academic Performance in First Year { Same as above
formula in 2.1.3}
15
2.2 Student enrollment
(>=90% - 15M; >=80% - 10M; >=70% - 5M; otherwise
– 0)
15
2.3 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship:
50 X (students placed + admitted to higher studies +
3 X entrepreneurs ) / (Total students)
50
2.4 Achievements in curricular, co-curricular and extra- curricular activities (45)
2.4.1 International Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I
Prize = 15M, II Prize = 10M, III Prize = 5M,
For Participation = 1M
220
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
2.4.2 National Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I Prize
= 10M, II Prize = 5M, III Prize = 2M,
For Participation of 5 members = 1M
45
2.4.3 State Level (Paper, model presentation etc.) I Prize =
5M, II Prize = 3M, III Prize = 1M, For Participation of 10
members 1M
3 Faculty contributions: (Max-275)
S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
3.1 Research Guidance (20)
3.1.1 M.Phil / M.Tech./ (4M / candidate )
3.1.2 Ph.D. (10 M/ candidate)
3.2 Research Projects (40)
3.2.1 Major (More than 10 lakhs) 15M / project
25
3.2.2 Minor (5M/ project)
3.2.3 Patents (5 M/ patent) 5
3.3 Consultancy:
More than 2 Lakhs : 10 marks
< 2 lakhs: 5 marks
10
3.4 Publications(75)
3.4.1 Books, book chapters (5M / each chapter) 10
3.4.2 Publication in journals:
Marks awarded=40 X P/F
F : number of faculty,
P=0.5P1+0.5P2;
Where P1 = { PW, PS}
P2=no. of publications reported in Indian citation index,
UGC list of journal,
PW : No. of publications reported in Web of science, SCI
PS : No. of publications reported in Scopus
40
221
S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
3.4.3 Quality publications:
QP = 15 ×p (CC/P) + 5 × p(NCI) + 5 × p(TOP25P)} Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous 3
years. P is total number of publications over this period as
computed for PU. CC, NCI and TOP25P computed as follows :
CC = 0.45CCW + 0.45CCS + 0.1CCI NCI = 0.5 NCIW + 0.5 NCIS TOP25P = 0.5 TOP25PW + 0.5 TOP25PS NCI: Field normalized citation index averaged over
the previous 3 years. TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile
averaged over the previous 3 years.
25
3.5 Papers presented in seminars / conferences (30)
3.5.1 International (max 20)
3M / paper
30
3.5.2 National (max 10)
1M / paper
3.6 Seminars / Conferences / Workshops / Symposia wherein served as Resource person (20)
3.6.1 Keynote Speaker / Chairman / Co-Chairman /
Distinguished Guest / Key Speaker / Lead Discussant
International: 4M/session (max 20) ; National:
2M/session (max 10)
3.7 Membership in editorial boards and number of papers
reviewed (5M / paper)
10
3.8 Membership / executive positions in professional
bodies and their related activities (5M / activity)
10
3.9 Development activities (product development,
instructional materials, working models, charts,
monogram etc.) 2M/activity
10
3.10 Guest lectures delivered by faculty
Industry / research institutes / universities
5M / lecture
10
3.11 Awards and honors (only academic bodies and Govt.
Organizations) 10M/award
10
3.12 Faculty Qualification
FQ =2 x [(10X +6Y)/F)] where X is the no. of regular
faculty with Ph.D., Y is the no. of regular faculty with M.Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply
1:15 Faculty Student ratio
20
222
S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
3.13 Faculty participation in Faculty development/training
activities/STTPs
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Participation in 2 to 5 days FDP: 3 M Participation>5 days FDP: 5 M
Assessment = 3×Sum of points/0.5RF where RF is required faculty as per 1:15 ratio
20
4. Co-curricular activities: (Max-100)
S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks on
non
compliance
4.1 Expert faculty / industrial heads visits
From Foreign universities / IITs, NITs /research
organizations / companies (5M/ visit)
From universities (4M / visit)
15
4.2 International / national Events organized
5 / event 15
4.3 Department Journal / News letter / Magazine /
Website 5
4.4 Certificate programmes / short term programmes
organized 10M /programme 15
4.5 Alumni association meetings 5
4.6 Contributions from Alumni
(Technical collaboration / employment providers / aid
for infrastructure improvement / scholarships)
5
4.7 Extension activities (participation of faculty &
students in community services) 10
4.8 MoU’s / Joint programmes signed (5M / MoU) 5
4.9 Adjunct faculty (Minimum 30 Hrs engagement
/semester) (10M / faculty) 10
4.10 Student activity clubs and their related activities (5M
/ activity) 15
223
5. Student support systems: (Max-100)
S.
No
Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
5.1 Mentoring system:
Efficacy of the system (5M), impact analysis (10M)
15
5.2 Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any and impact analysis
(20)
5.2.1 Feed back on facilities (2M) and corrective
measures (3M)
5
5.2.2 Feedback from recruiters (2M) and corrective
measures (3M)
5
5.2.3 Feedback from employers (2M) and corrective
measures (3M)
5
5.2.4 Feedback from Alumni (2M) and corrective
measures (3M)
5
5.3 Self learning (15)
5.3.1 Scope for self-learning 5
5.3.2 The facilities provided such as materials for
learning beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast,
MOOCs etc. and demonstrate its effective
utilization
10
5.4 Career Guidance, Training, Placement (20)
5.4.1 Availability of career guidance facilities 5
5.4.2 Counseling for higher studies (GATE/GRE, GMAT,
etc.)
3
5.4.3 Pre-placement training (6M) 6
5.4.4 Placement process and support (6M) 6
5.5 Entrepreneurship Cell (10)
5.5.1 Entrepreneurship initiatives 6
5.5.2 Data on students benefitted 4
5.6 Grievance redressal system for the students and
action taken
10
5.7 New facilities created / development in the
departments (common rooms, study rooms,
project rooms, department library etc.)
10
6. Continuous Improvement (Max-50)
S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
6.1 PO And PSO attainment {2M For Each 1% Increase} 10 6.2 Pass percentage{ 2M For Each 1% Increase} 10
6.3 Intake: ( Improvement in mean rank in open category- 5M) + (>95% seats filled -5M 90-95% seats filled – 3M, and below 90% - 0M)
10
224
6.4 Student Placements, Higher Studies & Entrepreneurship {1M For Each 1% Increase}
10
6.5 Faculty Publications {1M For Each 1% Increase} 10 7. Innovative / Best practices and their impact (Max-25) S. No Description Max
marks
Marks
awarded
Remarks
7.1 Describe the best practices the department claims
to have a niche for itself in the areas such as
Teaching learning process, community
engagement, co-curricular activities, evaluation,
feedback system, Student participation in other
activities, Alumni activities etc.,
10
7.2 The impact of such activities 15
225
Annexure-16 Table B 8.4.2 Record of Course Outcome Attainment (I Year Courses)
CAY 2018-19
Course CO
Attainment
CIV111 English
CIV111.1 1.6
CIV111.2 1.6
CIV111.3 2
CIV111.4 1.3
CIV111.5 1.6
CIV112 Engineering
Mathematics – I
CIV112.1 1.3
CIV112.2 1
CIV112.3 1.7
CIV112.4 0.4
CIV112.5 1.4
CIV113 Engineering Physics
CIV113.1 0.4
CIV113.2 1.3
CIV113.3 0.7
CIV113.4 1.3
CIV113.5 1.7
CIV114 Engineering Drawing
CIV114.1 1.6
CIV114.2 1
CIV114.3 1
Course CO
Attainment
CIV114.4 0.7
CIV114.5 0.7
CIV115 Environmental Sciences
CIV115.1 2.6
CIV115.2 1.6
CIV115.3 2.2
CIV115.4 2
CIV115.5 1.6
CIV116 Engineering Physics Lab
CIV116.1 2.6
CIV116.2 2.6
CIV117 Programming With C Lab
CIV117.1 1.8
CIV117.2 2.6
CIV117.3 2.6
CIV117.4 1.8
CIV118 Workshop
CIV118.1 2.6
CIV118.2 2.6
CIV118.3 2.6
CIV118.4 3
CIV121 Engineering
Mathematics-II
226
Course CO
Attainment
CIV121.1 1.9
CIV121.2 1.7
CIV121.3 0.7
CIV121.4 0.7
CIV121.5 0.4
CIV122 Engineering Chemistry
CIV122.1 1
CIV122.2 1
CIV122.3 1
CIV122.4 1
CIV122.5 1
CIV122.6 0.4
CIV123 Professional Ethics And
Human Values
CIV123.1 2
CIV123.2 1
CIV123.3 1.0
CIV123.4 2
CIV123.5 2
CIV124 Mathematics For Civil
Engineers
CIV124.1 1.3
CIV124.2 0.7
CIV124.3 1.3
CIV124.4 1.6
CIV124.5 1
Course CO
Attainment
CIV125 Civil Engineering
Materials
CIV125.1 1
CIV125.2 0.9
CIV125.3 0
CIV126 Engineering Chemistry
Lab
CIV126.1 2.6
CIV126.2 2.6
CIV127 Language Lab
CIV127.1 1.6
CIV127.2 2
CIV127.3 1.6
CIV127.4 2
233
Annexure-20
Grievance and Redressal Committee Members
Name Address & Contact no.
Prof. T. V. Hanumantha Rao Principal ANITS
Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No.: 9441011735, 08933-225085 Email: [email protected] [email protected]
Prof. B. Nagaraju HoD, Mechanical Engineering ANITS
Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No. 9849820049 Email: [email protected]
Dr. G Sarvani V Swamy English & Humanities ANITS, Member
Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No. 9989394736 Email: [email protected]
Mr. A.A.Santhosh Kumar Asst. Admn. Officer (Member) ANITS, Member
Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam Visakhapatnam Contact No. 8500373330 Email: [email protected]
Mr. P. Virender Student (Member) Regd No: 315126514121 B.Tech. IV/IV EEE ANITS
H.No:2-206/1, Arun Complex Opp. Suryamahal Theatre, Vakalapudi Kakinada, West Godavari 9492506809, 9492506809
Ms. K S S N V Varalakshmi Student (Member) Regd. No: 315126502011 B. Tech.. – IV/IV – Ch.E, ANITS
H.No: 18-73-56, LIG – 251 APHB Colony, Pedagantyada Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Cell:9703429971, 9581575997
Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences (Autonomous) (Affiliated to AU, Approved by AICTE & Accredited by NBA & NAAC with ‘A’ Grade)
SANGIVALASA-531 162, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District
Phone: 08933-225083/84/87 Fax: 226395
Website: www.anits.edu.in email: [email protected]