5
1 Strategic Objectives Operational Approach Tactical Actions Supporting a Comprehensive Approach Complex Operational Environment Achieve favorable outcomes in conjunction with partners Comprehensive Approach - Military Actions - Nat’l and Int’l Objectives Mission Partners Objectives Combatant Command Theater Objectives Joint/Coalition Forces Objectives Problem Framing Favorable Outcomes Insights Understand DOD’s complementary support of the other instruments of power (D-I-E) to accomplish national objectives Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders and staffs to interact with external mission partners and stakeholders Situation is dynamic requiring continuous dialogue; guidance and intent will evolve to adapt to changing conditions in the operational environment 1 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders

1

Strategic Objectives Operational Approach Tactical Actions

Supporting a Comprehensive Approach

Complex Operational Environment

Achieve favorable

outcomes in conjunction

with partners

ComprehensiveApproach

- Military Actions -

Nat’l and Int’lObjectives

MissionPartners

Objectives

CombatantCommand

TheaterObjectives

Joint/CoalitionForces

Objectives

ProblemFraming

FavorableOutcomes

• Dialogue between national leaders, DOD, and interorganizational partners

• Translate dialogue into Theater Strategic Objectives

• Provide mission type orders with guidance and intent

• Empower subordinates to conduct synergistic operations with mission partners

• Analyze the environment leveraging the perspectives of mission partners and stakeholders

• Frame the problem; determine favorable outcomes

• Develop an operational approach

Insights• Understand DOD’s complementary support of the other instruments of power (D-I-E) to

accomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force

Commanders and staffs to interact with external mission partners and stakeholders• Situation is dynamic requiring continuous dialogue; guidance and intent will evolve to

adapt to changing conditions in the operational environment1

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Page 2: UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders

2

UNCLASSIFIED

Operational ArtStrategic Objectives Conditions Actions

Operational Approach

Guidance / Intent

*PMESII – Political, Military, Economic, Social, Information, and Infrastructure*COG – Center of Gravity

Nat’l and Int’lObjectives

MissionPartners

ObjectivesCombatantCommand

TheaterObjectives

Joint/CoalitionForces

Objectives

CurrentState

PMESII*COG*

Analysis

Problem

Define Ends,Ways, Means,

Risk

DesiredState

Insights• Operational Art translates strategy into action by informing Operational Design• Operational Design offers a methodology to apply Operational Art• Commanders articulate their vision, guidance, and intent through Operational Approach• KEY: Requires balancing Ends, Ways, Means and identifying acceptable Risk

UNCLASSIFIED2

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Purpose: Illustrate the Operational Art. Operational art links the written and unwritten policy and strategy into key actions in the operating environment. “Good operational art, demonstrated as often as necessary to support the achievement of campaign objectives, ensures that tactical actions contribute to the attainment of the purpose” of the conflict (Kelly and Brennan, “Alien: How Operational Art Devoured Strategy” September 2009). It is also important to note that in the absence of a clear strategic level end state or necessary resources, the Cdr ultimately remains responsible for the success of the mission. MY CHANGES: -added “by informing Operational Design” to first bullet -Switched 2nd and 3rd bullet order -changed “Analysis” box to “Understanding” (JPP Step 1, not Step 2) -added Operational Design arrow (one-way) to indicate that Op Art informs the Op Design process, which ultimately turn strategy into action, which can feed back into Op Art and strategy/objectives -added Operational Art picture from JP 5-0 as an animated build to break down the “blue cloud” material
Page 3: UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders

8

“As President, my highest priority is to ensure the safety and security of the American people. In order to advise and assist me in executing this solemn responsibility, as well as to protect and advance the national interests of the United States at home and abroad, I hereby direct that my system for national security policy development and decision-making shall be organized as follows…”

- National Security Presidential Memorandum,4 April 2017

Deputies Committee (DC)

Insights• NSC provides an interagency process for developing

national security policy• Policy is normally developed bottom-up during steady state

or top-down during a crisis• DOD has established positions at each level of NSC process

Policy CoordinationCommittees (PCCs)

Sub-PCC Sub-PCC Sub-PCC

Sub-PCC WGSub-PCC WGSub-PCC WG

National Security Council

OSD(P) / JS J5

SecDef / CJCS

SecDef / CJCS

Principals Committee (PC)

DepSecDef / VCJCS

USD(P) / JS J5

DASD(P) / JS DDJ5

DOD Action Officers

National Security Council System (NSCS)

Policy CoordinationCommittees (PCCs)Policy Coordination

Committees (PCCs)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Interagency coordination at the national level starts at the National Security Staff (NSS). Directives that are used to promulgate Presidential decisions on national security matters are currently designated Presidential Policy Directives (PPDs). This presidential/NSC guidance is usually broad by nature. As a result, not all agencies interpret policy the same way and makes cooperation that much more difficult. Interagency Policy Committees (both Regional and Functional, see chart below) Main day-to-day forum that provide analysis for more senior committees Deputies Committee works for the Principles Committee when convened by the President. Other senior officials are invited to attend NSC meetings pertaining to their responsibilities or otherwise as appropriate. The final key for this slide is that DOD has representation in all levels of the interagency process. Permanent structures of this nature normally do not exist at the operational level; JFCs are challenged to gain unity of effort at the operational level through initiatives to establish procedures and mechanisms for coordination. Abbreviations/Acronyms: CJCS – Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff DNI – Director of National Intelligence HLS – Homeland Security JCS – Joint Chiefs of Staff OSD – Office of the Secretary of Defense SecDef – Secretary of Defense USUN – United States Mission to the United Nations VCJCS – Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
Page 4: UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders
Page 5: UNCLASSIFIED Supporting a Comprehensive … Slides.pdfaccomplish national objectives • Developing a shared visualization of the operational environment requires Joint Force Commanders