3
UNCIANO PARAMEDICAL COLLEGE vs. COURT OF APPEALS 221 SCRA 285 (1993) FACTS: Some nursing students were not admitted for the second semester for organizing a student body council which was not allowed by the school which was allegedly a violation of the school regulations. The school argued that under the ALCUAZ DOCTRINE, schools have the discretion to admit students for the second semester because upon enrolment of a student in the first semester, the contract was for that semester only. However a new doctrine was later on promulgated which abandoned the Alcuaz doctrine which is now the NON doctrine. ISSUE: Whether or not the new Non doctrine be applied retroactively to the case. HELD: No. The new doctrine shall be applied prospectively and should not apply to parties who relied on the old doctrine and acted on faith thereof.

Unciano Paramedical College vs. CA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

case digest

Citation preview

Page 1: Unciano Paramedical College vs. CA

UNCIANO PARAMEDICAL COLLEGE vs. COURT OF APPEALS221 SCRA 285 (1993)

FACTS:

Some nursing students were not admitted for the second semester for organizing a student body council which was not allowed by the school which was allegedly a violation of the school regulations. The school argued that under the ALCUAZ DOCTRINE, schools have the discretion to admit students for the second semester because upon enrolment of a student in the first semester, the contract was for that semester only. However a new doctrine was later on promulgated which abandoned the Alcuaz doctrine which is now the NON doctrine.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the new Non doctrine be applied retroactively to the case.

HELD:

No. The new doctrine shall be applied prospectively and should not apply to parties who relied on the old doctrine and acted on faith thereof.

Page 2: Unciano Paramedical College vs. CA

RELATED NEW CIVIL CODE PROVISION:

ARTICLE 4

Page 3: Unciano Paramedical College vs. CA