Upload
alice-white
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY IN LAND SURFACE PRECIPITATION OVER 100-PLUS YEARS
Elsa Nickl and Cort Willmott
University of Delaware
Department of Geography
Understanding the spatial and temporal variability of land-surface precipitation:indispensable for climate research
University of Delaware, Willmott and Matsuura dataset Spatial mean of land surface precipitation for 1900-2006 period
Land Surface Precipitation Fields Datasets (based on in situ observations)
• A growing demand for higher spatial (e.g. 0.5o ) and temporal (e.g. monthly, daily) resolution gridded datasets
•Currently there are three land surface monthly precipitation datasets for the period 1901-2006 at 0.5o resolution:
•Climate Research Unit (CRU) dataset•University of Delaware (Udel or Willmott and Matsuura) archive•Global Precipitation Climate Center (GPCC) dataset
Low spatial density of weather stations in complex terrain regions (e.g. mountainous regions)
OBJECTIVES
To explore the spatial and temporal variability of land-surface precipitation using three current high resolution gridded datasets.
To propose a new approach for estimating monthly land-surface precipitation fields from rain gage station records
DATA
o Gridded monthly land-surface precipitation (1901-2006) at 0.5o resolution from: Udel archive, GPCC dataset and CRU dataset
•US monthly land-surface precipitation (2001-2005) from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
•Central Peruvian Andes land-surface precipitation climatologies (1965-2000) from ELECTROPERU.
• Digital Elevation information at 2.5 minutes resolution (used by PRISM, derived from EROS Data Center 3 arc sec) (US area)
•Digital Elevation information at 0.5 minute resolution from GTOPO30 (Peruvian Andes area)
INTERPOLATION METHODS
Udel archive (Matsuura and Willmott)1900-2006 Gridded Monthly Time Series
Climatologically Aided Interpolation method
• High-resolution climatology•Monthly precipitation differences at each station•Station differences are interpolated to a gridded field using Shepard’s algorithm• Each gridded difference is added back onto the corresponding climatology
INTERPOLATION METHODS
Climate Research Unit dataset (1901-2002)
Angular Distance Weighted (ADW) interpolation
• Weights 8 nearest stations from the grid point (using a Correlation Decay Distance and the directional isolation of each station)•At grid points where there is no station within CDD, interpolated anomalies are forced to zero (as a consequence, estimated time series over some areas are invariant for many years)
Number of years since 1901 with repetitive information
INTERPOLATION METHODS
Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCC, 1901-2006)
SPHEREMAP interpolation tool (developed by Wilmmott and his graduate students)
• It’s an spherical adaptation of Shepard’s algorithm•Shepard’s takes into account:
• Distances of the stations to the grid point (limited number of nearest stations)• Directional distribution of stations (to avoid overweighting of clustered stations)• Spatial gradients within the data field in the grid-point environment
TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF LAND-SURFACE PRECIPITATION
•Similar trends until the end of 1970s (except GPCC)•Early 1980s datasets show a decline with a “recovery” of 2 datasets (CRU and GPCC) in the early 1990s. Udel dataset remains negative until 2006
SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF LAND SURFACEPRECIPITATION (1901-1976)
• Slight increases over many areas, with some very largeincreases apparent in Udel and GPCC datasets, especially over the Amazon Basin
•A large but questionable decrease over the Tibetian Plateau
Udel
GPCC
CRU
SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF LAND SURFACEPRECIPITATION (1977-2002)
Udel
GPCC
CRU
• Udel and GPCC datasets show decreasing land-surface precipitation over many regions of North America, Central America, Central South America, equatorial Africa and the maritime continent
•These patterns are not present with CRU dataset to the same extent
PRECIPITATION CHANGE AND TELECONNECTIONS(taking into account change-point method)
1965-1975
1976-2000
Change-point regression (Draper and Smith, 1981): to identify the years of major change.This method determines optimal change-point in time-series by minimizing the sum of squared residuals of all possible change-point regressions
SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF CHANGE-POINT
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Exploration of the relationships between monthly precipitation and the spatial arrangements of topographic patterns:
Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) :
•Linear relationship between precipitation and elevation•Estimated orographic elevation•“Facets” (contiguous areas of homogeneous slope orientation)
Western US
Central Peruvian Andes
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Winter (DJF) Summer (JJA)
Elevation and seasonal precipitation (with more than 200mm) in the Western US
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
“Special” scatterplots: To explore relationships between spatial arrangements of elevation, slope, slope orientation and precipitation
Western US, 2.5 min resolution:
Winter: Not apparent relationshipHigh precipitation values at elevations <1km
Summer:Most precipitation is convective
Winter (DJF)
Summer(JJA)
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Central Peruvian Andes, 0.5 min resolution:
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Identification of the “orographic scale”
Adjustable-scale spatial ellipse (to estimateareal extent of orographic influence)
Averaging up from a high-resolution DEM to a more coarse spatial resolution
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Western US:Elevation, slope, slope orientation andprecipitation during winter (DJF)
7.5 min
12.5 min
A slight relationship between higher winterprecipitation and SW and NE orientations at elevations greater than 1km.
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
San Joaquin Valley and Sierra Nevadas:Elevation, slope, slope orientation andprecipitation during winter (DJF)
7.5 min
12.5 min
A moderate relationship between higher winterprecipitation and W and SW orientations at elevations greater than 500 meters.
Central Peruvian Andes:Elevation, slope, slope orientation andprecipitation during austral summer (DJF)
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Localized relationship between higher precipitation values and NE slope orientations, especially at 2.5 min resolution
1.5 min
2.5 min
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
Central Peruvian Andes:Elevation and precipitation for low and high slope values
NEW METHOD OF INTERPOLATION
1. Horizontal-distance and direction influences (based on modified Shepard’s interpolator)
2. Additional topographic influences on interpolated precipitation (from elevation,slope, slope orientation and the degree of exposure to orography Important: the orographic scale
• Orographic elevation• Longitudinal and latitudinal components of the slope of the orographic region
• Potential exposure of station “i” to orography
We can estimate an interpolation bias for each station:
from nearby stations PiˆjP
iz
dz dx
(
dz dy
PiE
ˆΔ [ , ( ), ( ), ]Pi i i i iP P P f z dz dx dz dy E
Then we can estimateΔ jP
ˆ ˆ Δj j jP P P And finally:
CONCLUSIONS
• The spatial and temporal variability of land-surface precipitationover the last 100-plus years is uncertain, as is evident in the differences between available gridded datasets
• The relationships between spatial arrangements of topographic patterns and precipitation in mountainous regions are stronger for more coarse spatialresolutions.
•A central aspect of the new interpolation method is to estimate the areal extentof orographic influence (orographic scale)
•Understanding the spatial and temporal variability of land surface precipitation and precipitation change is useful for teleconnection analysis in Central Peruvian Andes