Ultraviolet Protection for Knitwear Fabric Jimmy Lam, Polly Chiu Jimmy Lam, Polly Chiu Institute of Textiles & Clothing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

21-23 June 2010 Vilnius, Lithuania

1

Ultraviolet Protection for Ultraviolet Protection for Knitwear FabricKnitwear Fabric

Ultraviolet Protection for Ultraviolet Protection for Knitwear FabricKnitwear Fabric

Jimmy Lam, Polly ChiuJimmy Lam, Polly ChiuInstitute of Textiles & ClothingInstitute of Textiles & Clothing

The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University


2

Outlines• Introduction and Background• Experimental Details

– UV Transmission Test– Test Method– Knitted Fabric Test

• Results and Discussions– Group A: Single Knit– Group B & C : Single Knit– Group D: Double Knit

• Conclusions


3

Introduction & Backgrounds

• Textile materials and clothing have been used since antiquity by human beings for the purpose of protection, comfort and adornment.

• But there were not much concern on how clothing protect us against skin cancer caused by excessive exposure to solar UVR until nowadays, since people are increasing their emphasis on health and environmental protection in today’s world.


4

Introduction & Backgrounds

• According to the World Health Organization (WHO), recent statistics shown that the number of people died from skin cancer each year is increasing; while the Australian statistics represent the highest incidence of skin cancer world-wide.

• In Australia, over one thousand people died from skin cancer annually and there are approximately 270,000 new cases of skin cancer diagnosed per year.

• Skin cancer became one of the top 10 cancers in Hong Kong for the first time in 2002, and then it ranked as the 9th most common cancer in Hong Kong in 2006; while there were 624 new cases


5

HK UK USA Australia

Male/Female ratio 1: 0.71 1:1.14 1:0.64 1:0.65

Incidence rate* 0.5 13 16.2 46.9

Incidence relative to that of HK

1 26 32.4 93.8

Table 1: epidemiology of melanomas in different countries in 2003


6

Benefits to Textiles and Benefits to Textiles and Clothing IndustriesClothing Industries

• The Hong Kong Observatory introduced the measurement of solar UV Index in Hong Kong since 1999 and presents the results of statistical analysis on the daily and hourly UV Indices.

• The relationship between UV index and exposure level is shown in Table 2.

• The distribution of UV index and exposure level from 1999 to 2009 is summarized in Table 3.


7


Table 2: UV Index and Exposure Level

UV Index Exposure Level

0-2 Low

3-5 Moderate

6-7 High

8-10 Very High

>= 11 Extreme


8


Table 3: Frequency Distribution (number of days and percentage) of Daily Maximum UV Index in Different Exposure

Categories and Months(1 August 1999 - 31 July 2009)

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Low (0-2)

40 1.1%

39 1.1%

48 1.3%

26 0.7%

15 0.4%

19 0.5%

6 0.2%

17 0.5%

5 0.1%

6 0.2%

16 0.4%

17 0.5%

254 7.0%

Moderate (3-5)

186 5.1%

87 2.4%

83 2.3%

81 2.2%

38 1.0%

43 1.2%

27 0.7%

36 1.0%

43 1.2%

43 1.2%

101 2.8%

224 6.1%

992 27.2%

High (6-7)

80 2.2%

101 2.8%

94 2.6%

50 1.4%

40 1.1%

37 1.0%

32 0.9%

34 0.9%

49 1.3%

138 3.8%

168 4.6%

69 1.9%

892 24.5%

V. High (8-10)

3 0.1%

55 1.5%

83 2.3%

105 2.9%

119 3.3%

82 2.3%

64 1.8%

83 2.3%

161 4.4%

122 3.3%

15 0.4%

0 0.0%

892 24.5%

Extreme (>=11)

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 0.1%

38 1.0%

98 2.7%

119 3.3%

181 5.0%

137 3.8%

38 1.0%

1 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

614 16.8%


9


• From Table 2, it could conclude that the UV exposure level in Hong Kong is always in the categories from “Moderate” to “Extreme”.

• In accordance with WHO’s advice, with UV exposure level greater than 3, sun protection is required.

• Therefore, there is a need in Hong Kong to design and engineer lightweight knitwear fabrics with UV protection function in regard to various Hong Kong’s whole year weather situation.


10

Introduction and background

• Despite the importance of protection afforded by textile fabrics against ultraviolet radiation, there are few systematic studies on the interaction between the structure and physical properties of the textile materials to UV protection especially on summer lightweight knitted fabric.

• However, it is believed that fabric cover factor, has a direct influence on the fabric ultraviolet protection factor [2]. The most important fabric properties in this context are: tightness factor, fibre type, yarn construction, fabric construction, finishing processes, colour, UV absorbers, wash and wear, fabric stretch and wetting [3-6].

• In this research project, textile engineering approach was applied and the effect of tightness formed by different knitting tensions on UPF was examined


11

Experimental DetailsExperimental DetailsExperimental DetailsExperimental Details


12

UV Transmission Test• UV transmission measurement was one of the

most important tests in this project.• There were several UV testing standards in the

textile industry: Australia/ New Zealand standard; USA standard and British & European standards.

• Each standard test method used its own defined set of data for calculation and required different test conditions.

• In this project, the UV blocking test was in reference to the Australia/ New Zealand Standard: AS/NZS 4399:1966 “Sun Protective Clothing-Evaluation and Classification”. It is because this standard was one of the most commonly used standard.


13

Table 4: A brief comparison of different clothing standards for UV blocking testing

CountryAustralia/ New

ZealandUSA British &

European

Standard number

AS/NZS 4399:1996 AATCC 183:1998 BS 7914:1998

Results expression

All three standards report results as UPF rating

Calculation method

Calculate mean UPF value and average of

UVA & UVB transmission, to

classify UPF level

Similar to AS/NZS 4399:1996

Calculate the erythemally

effective penetration (P):

P=1/UPF

Testing condition

Not specify any conditioning, normally 205C and 5020% relative humidity (RH)

Require sample conditioning of

211C and 652% RH for at least 4

hours

Require sample conditioning of 202C and

652% RH for at least 16 hours

Wavelength range

290-400nm 280-400nm 290-400nm

Samples required

4 samples test required 6 samples test required

4 samples test required

Samples state Only specifies testing in dry and relaxed state

Provide measurements of wet

and/or stretched samples

Provide measurements of

wet and/or stretched samples

for European standard

(EN13758-1)


14

Test Method

• In this research, protection factor (PF) was used for comparison and analysis because it is useful to quantify the UVR protection by fabric.

• PF indicates how much UVR is blocked by a textile material. For instance, a material with a UVR falling on PF rating of 20 would allow 1/20th of UVR falling on its surface to pass through it; which means that it would block 95% of the UVR and transmit only 10%.

• The following equation is used to calculate PF:

400

290

400

290

TSE

SE

EDn

EDPF


15

Knitted Fabric Test• Five groups of knitted fabrics were produced

on three different gauges circular knitting machine using both cotton and coolmax yarn.

• Both single knit and double knit structures were produced with different tightness in order to evaluate the degree of knitted fabric porosity to UV protection.

• A detail of these five groups of fabrics is shown in Table 5.


16

Table 5: Experimental Knitted Fabrics on Single Knit and Double Knit Production

FabricFabric type

Machine Gauge Material Yarn count

Knitting structure

Group A Single Knit

SJE Jumberca 22G Cotton 32Ne Jersey (all knit)Lacoste (knit+tuck)

Jacquard (knit+miss)

Group B Single Knit

DXC Fukuhara

20G Cotton 32Ne Jersey (all knit)Lacoste (knit+tuck)

Group C Single Knit

DXC Fukuhara

20G Coolmax 30Ne Jersey (all knit)Lacoste (knit+tuck)

Group D Double Knit

Albi 16G Cotton 32Ne 1X1 rib (all knit);Full milano (knit+miss);

Full cardigan (knit+tuck);Interlock

Group E Double Knit

Albi 16G Coolmax 30Ne 1X1 rib (all knit);Full milano (knit+miss);

Full cardigan (knit+tuck);Interlock


17

• Two different loop lengths (fabric tightness) were produced for each group of fabric and each fabric group has different knitting sturctures.

• Details of different knitting structures are shown in Table 6.

• As different knitting structures will affect the openness of the knitted loop, which in turn will affect the degree of UV protection for different type of knitted fabric.


18

Table 6: Fabric Structures

Fabric typeKnit Stitch Fabric structure

Single Knit All KnitKnit and TuckKnit+tuck+miss

Jersey (Plain)LacosteJacqaurd

Double Knit All KnitKnit+ missKnit+TuckAll Knit (interlock)

1X1 rib Full milanoFull cardiganInterlock


19

Results and Results and DiscussionsDiscussionsResults and Results and DiscussionsDiscussions


20

Group A: Single Knit Fabric

• Figure 1 shows the results of UPF protection for different stitches of single knit fabric with two different knitting tensions.

• The effect of tightness (loose knitted fabric vs tight knitted fabric) has little effect on UV protection. However, different knitting structures will affect the UV protection properties.

• The jacquard fabric (knit+tuck+miss stitches) has the highest UV protection than jersey (all knit) fabric. The lacoste (knit+tuck) has the lowest UV protection.


21

Single knit by J umberca

0

10

20

30

40

50

All knit (Loose) All knit (Tight) Knit + Tuck(Loose)

Knit + tuck(Tuck)

Knit + Tuck +Miss (Loose)

Knit + Tuck +Miss (Tight)

Single Knit Structure

UPF

ratin

gs

Cotton

Figure 1: UPF rating on single knit cotton fabric with different knitting structures


22

Group B & C FabricSingle Knit

• Both Group B and C were produced on the DXC Fukuhara circular knitting machine with two different materials.

• Group B was pure cotton yarn and Group C was coolmax yarn.

• The average UPF for these two different materials are shown in Fig. 2.


23

Single knit by DXC Fukuhara

0

5

10

15

20

All knit (Loose) All knit (Tight) Knit + Tuck (Loose) Knit + Tuck (Tight)

Single Knit Structure

UPF

ratin

gs

Cotton

Coolmax

Figure 2: UPF rating on single knit fabrics using cotton and coolmax yarns


24

• It can be shown in Figure 2 that coolmax yarn has a higher UV rating than cotton yarn.

• The UV rating is significantly higher on tightly knitted fabric than loosely knitted fabric.

• For both cotton and coolmax fabrics, the UV rating is higher on plain knitted (all knit) structure than lacoste (knit and tuck) structures.

• This can be explained in term of open structure of tuck stitch. Tuck stitch will make the fabric wider which in turn will increase the knitted loop porosity and decrease the UV protection,


25

Group D & EDouble Knit Fabrics

• Group D and E fabrics were produced on Albi Cylinder and Dial circular double knit machine.

• Group D was made by pure cotton yarn and group E was made by coolmax yarn.

• Three different double knit structures were produced, namely 1X1 rib (all knit); Full Milano Rib (Knit+Miss) and Full Cardigan Rib (Knit+Tuck).

• Results were shown in Figure 3.


26

Double Knit Fabric

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Full Milano,Tighted

Full Milano,Loosed

Full Cardigan,Tighted

Full Cardigan,Loosed

1X1 Rib,Tighted 1X1 Rib,Loosed

Knit Strucutres

UP

F P

rote

ctio

n

Cotton UPF Coolmax UPF

Figure 3: UPF rating on double knit structures by cotton and coolmax yarn


27

Figure 6 Two courses repeat of interlock fabric


28

Double Knit with Interlock

0

50

100

150

200

250

Full Milano,Tighted

Full Milano,Loosed

FullCardigan,Tighted

FullCardigan,Loosed

1X1Rib,Tighted

1X1Rib,Loosed

Interlock,Tighted

Interlock,Loosed

Kit Strucutres

UP

F P

rote

ctio

n

Cotton UPF Coolmax UPF

Figure 5: UPF rating on interlock fabric and rib fabrics


29

Conclusions• An engineering approach of the knitted fabric porosity to UV

protection in terms different stitches (Knit, Tuck and Miss stitches) and fibres (cotton and Coolmax) were studied.

• For the single knit structures, jacquard fabric (knit and miss stitches) has the highest UPF rating, followed by plain fabric (knit stitch) and lacoste fabric (knit and tuck stitch).

• For the double knit fabrics, the highest UPF rating is interlock fabric, followed by full milano rib, 1X1 rib and the full cardigan rib gives the lowest UPF rating. These can be explained by different knit, tuck and miss stitches which will affect the porosity of knitted fabric. Tuck stitch shows the highest porosity in the fabric and followed by knit stitch and miss stitch.

• For all the knitting structures, double knit fabrics give higher UV rating than single knit fabrics. Coolmax yarn gives a higher UV rating than cotton yarn.


30

Acknowledgement• The authors would like to acknowledge

the funding supports from the Central Research Grant (A-AS21) from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Documents

Ultraviolet Protection for Knitwear Fabric Jimmy Lam, Polly Chiu Jimmy Lam, Polly Chiu Institute of Textiles & Clothing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University