Upload
xavikxavik
View
14
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
As published in LPI- June 2004 •
During the past 30 or so years, high perform-
ance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has
proven to be the predominant technology
used in laboratories worldwide. One of the
primary drivers for the growth of this tech-
nique has been the evolution of the packing
materials used to effect the separation. The
underlying principles of this evolution are
governed by the van Deemter equation, which
any student of chromatography is familiar
with [1]. The van Deemter equation is an
empirical formula that describes the relation-
ship between linear velocity (flow rate) and
plate height (HETP or column efficiency).
Since particle size is one of the variables, a van
Deemter curve can be used to investigate
chromatographic performance, as illustrated
in Figure 1.
Figure 1 demonstrates that as the particle size
decreases to less than 2.5 µm, not only is there
a significant gain in efficiency, but the effi-
ciency does not diminish at increased flow
rates or linear velocities. By using smaller par-
ticles, speed and peak capacity (number of
peaks resolved per unit time) can be extended
to new limits, termed Ultra Performance
Liquid Chromatography, or UPLC. Using
UPLC, it is now possible to take full advantage
of chromatographic principles to run separa-
tions using shorter columns, and/or higher
flow rates for increased speed, with superior
resolution and sensitivity. UPLC is further
illustrated in Figure 2, which compares the
separation of a five component sample mix-
ture using HPLC and UPLC.
Chemistry of small particlesThe design and development of
sub-2 µm particles is a significant chal-
lenge, and researchers have been very active
in this area to capitalise on their advantages
[2, 3]. Although high efficiency non-porous
1.5 µm particles are commercially available,
they suffer from low surface area, leading to
poor loading capacity and retention. To
maintain retention and capacity similar to
HPLC, UPLC must use a novel porous par-
ticle that can withstand high pressures.
Silica based particles have good mechanical
strength, but suffer from a number of dis-
advantages. These include tailing of basic
analytes and a limited pH range. Another
alternative, polymeric columns, can over-
come pH limitations, but they have their
own issues, including low efficiencies and
limited capacities.
In 2000, Waters introduced a first generation
hybrid chemistry, called XTerra, which com-
bines the advantageous properties of both sil-
ica and polymeric columns - they are
mechanically strong, with high efficiency, and
operate over an extended pH range. XTerra
columns are produced using a classical sol-gel
Ultra performance liquid chromatography:tomorrow's HPLC technology today
In recent years, significant technological advances havebeen made in particle chemistry performance, systemoptimisation, detector design, and data processing andcontrol. When brought together, the individual achieve-ments in each discipline have created a step-functionimprovement in chromatographic performance. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) is a newcategory of analytical separation science that retainsthe practicality and principles of HPLC, while increasingthe overall interlaced attributes of speed, sensitivity andresolution.
by Dr. Michael E. Swartz and Brian J. Murphy
Figure 1. van Deemter plot illustrating the evolution of particle sizes over the last threedecades.
NOVEL PHASES FOR HPLC
As published in LPI- June 2004 •
synthesis that incorporates carbon in the
form of methyl groups. However, in order to
provide the kind of enhanced mechanical sta-
bility UPLC requires, a second generation
hybrid technology was developed [4], called
ACQUITY UPLC. ACQUITY 1.7 µm particles
bridge the methyl groups in the silica matrix,
as shown in Figure 3, which enhances their
mechanical stability.
Packing a 1.7µm particle in reproducible and
rugged columns was also a challenge that
needed to be overcome. The column hardware
required a smoother interior surface and the
end frits were re-designed to retain the small
particles and resist clogging. Packed bed uni-
formity is also critical, especially if shorter
columns are to maintain resolution while
accomplishing the goal of faster separations.
All ACQUITY columns also include the eCord
microchip technology that captures the man-
ufacturing information for each column,
including the quality control tests and certifi-
cates of analysis. When used in the Waters
ACQUITY UPLC system, the eCord database
can also be updated with real time method
information, such as the number of injec-
tions, or pressure information, to maintain a
complete column history.
Capitalising on smaller particlesTo truly take advantage of the increased
speed, superior resolution and sensitivity
afforded by small particles, instrument tech-
nology also had to keep pace. A completely
new system design with advanced technology
in the pump, autosampler, detector, data sys-
tem, and service diagnostics was required. The
ACQUITY UPLC system has been holistically
designed for low system and dwell volume to
take full advantage of low dispersion and
small particle technology.
Achieving small particle, high peak capacity
separations requires a greater pressure range
than that achievable by today's HPLC instru-
mentation. The calculated pressure drop at
the optimum flow rate for maximum efficien-
cy across a 15 cm long column packed with
1.7 µm particles is about 15,000 psi. Therefore
a pump capable of delivering solvent smooth-
ly and reproducibly at these pressures, which
can compensate for solvent compressibility
and operate in both the gradient and isocrat-
ic separation modes, is required.
Sample introduction is also critical.
Conventional injection valves, either auto-
mated or manual, are not designed and hard-
ened to work at extreme pressure. To protect
the column from experiencing extreme pres-
sure fluctuations, the injection process must
be relatively pulse-free. The swept volume of
the device also needs to be minimal to reduce
potential band spreading. A fast injection
cycle time is needed to fully capitalise on the
speed afforded by UPLC, which in turn
requires a high sample capacity. Low volume
injections with minimal carryover are also
required to realise the increased sensitivity
benefits.
With 1.7 µm particles, half-height peak
widths of less than one second are obtained,
posing significant challenges for the detector.
In order to accurately and reproducibly inte-
grate an analyte peak, the detector sampling
rate must be high enough to capture enough
data points across the peak. In addition, the
detector cell must have minimal dispersion
(volume) to preserve separation efficiency.
Conceptually, the sensitivity increase for
UPLC detection should be 2-3 times higher
than HPLC separations, depending on the
detection technique. MS detection is signifi-
cantly enhanced by UPLC; increased peak
concentrations with reduced chromatograph-
ic dispersion at lower flow rates (no flow split-
ting) promotes increased source ionisation
efficiencies.
Figure 2. The top chromatogram is an overlay of both conventional (3 µm) HPLC and1.7 µm UPLC for a five component sample mixture. The bottom is an expansion of thefirst 0.6 minutes of the overlay to show the increased speed of UPLC, while resolution isstill maintained. Solvent use is also greatly reduced with UPLC.
NOVEL PHASES FOR HPLC
Figure 3. Synthesis and chemistry ofACQUITY 1.7µm particles for UPLC.
As published in LPI- June 2004 •
ApplicationsChromatographers are used to making compromises, and one of the
most common scenarios involves sacrificing resolution for speed. UPLC
overcomes such problems, as illustrated in Figure 4, which shows a sep-
aration of eight diuretics in under 1.6 minutes. The same separation on
a 2.1 by 100mm 5µm C18 HPLC column yields almost identical resolu-
tion, but takes ten minutes. For some analyses, however, speed is of a sec-
ondary importance, and peak capacity and resolution are the priority.
Figure 5 shows a peptide map where the desired goal is to maximise the
number of peaks. In this application, the increased peak capacity (num-
ber of peaks resolved per unit time) of UPLC dramatically improves the
quality of the data, resulting in a more definitive map.
ConclusionAt a time when any scientists have reached separation barriers pushing
the limits of conventional HPLC, UPLC presents the possibility to
extend and expand the utility of this widely used separation science.
The new ACQUITY technology in chemistry and instrumentation
provides more information per unit of work as UPLC begins to fulfill
the promise of increased speed, resolution and sensitivity predicted for
liquid chromatography.
References
1. van Deemter JJ, Zuiderweg FJ, and Klinkenberg A. Chem. Eng. Sci.
1956; 5: 271.
2. Jerkovitch AD, Mellors JS, and Jorgenson JW. LCGC North America.
2003; 21: 7.
3. Wu N, Lippert JA, and Lee ML. J. Chromotogr. 2001; 911: 1.
4. Wyndham KD, O’Gara JE, et al. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 6781-6788.
The authors
Michael E. Swartz, Ph.D., Principal Consulting Scientist,
Brian J. Murphy, Manager, Corporate Communications
Waters Corporation
34 Maple Street
Milford, MA 01757 USA
Tel.: +1 508 482 2614
Fax: +1 508 482 3443
Email: [email protected]
Figure 4. UPLC separation of eight diuretics. Column: 2.1 by 30mm 1.7 µm ACQUITY UPLC C18 at 35°C. A 9-45% B linear gra-dient over 0.8 minutes, at a flow rate of 0.86 mL/min was used.Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid, B was acetonitrile. UVdetection at 273nm. Peaks are in order: acetazolamide,hydrochlorothiazide, impurity, hydroflumethiazide, clopamide,trichlormethiazide, indapamide, bendroflumethiazide, andspironolactone, 0.1mg/mL of each in water.
Figure 5. HPLC v’s UPLC peak capacity. In this gradient peptidemap separation, the HPLC (top) separation (on a 5µm C18 col-umn) yields 70 peaks, or a peak capacity of 143, while the UPLCseparation (bottom) run under identical conditions yields 168peaks, or a peak capacity of 360, a 2.5 x increase.
NOVEL PHASES FOR HPLC