Upload
joshua-cannon
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ultra-Low Power Time Synchronization Using Passive Radio Receivers
Yin Chen† Qiang Wang* Marcus Chang† Andreas Terzis†
†Computer Science DepartmentJohns Hopkins University
*Dept. of Control Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of Technology
Motivation
• Message passing time synchronization– Requires the network be connected– Requires external time source for global
synchronization• Is there a low-power and low cost solution?
Current Day Time Sources
Station Country Frequency Launch Time
MSF Britain 60 kHz 1966
BPC China 68.5 kHz 2007
TDF France 162 kHz 1986
DCF77 Germany 77.5 kHz 1959
JJY Japan 40, 60 kHz 1999
RBU Russia 66.66 kHz 1965
WWVB USA 60 kHz 1963
LF Time Signal Radio Stations
Radio Controlled Clocks & Watches
This work will test DCF77 and WWVB
Contributions
• Ultra-low power universal time signal receiver• Evaluations on time signals availability and
accuracy in sensor network applications• Applications using this platform
The antenna is 10 cm in length
Smaller ones are available but we have not tested on our receiver
WWVB Time Signal
• 60 kHz carrier wave• Pulse width modulation with amplitude-shift
keying• NIST claims– Frequency uncertainty of 1 part in 1012
– Provide UTC with an uncertainty of 100 micro seconds
WWVB Signal Propagation
• Part of the signal travels along the ground– Groundwave : more stable
• Another part is reflected from the ionosphere– Skywave : less stable
• At distance < 1000 km, groundwave dominates
• Longer path, a mix of both• Very long path, skywave only
WWVB Code Format
60 seconds
Bit value = 0 Bit value = 1 Marker bit
• Each frame lasts 60 seconds• Each bit lasts 1 second
2010-5-2406:11:00 UTC
Time Signal Receiver Design
• Requirements– Low power consumption– High accuracy– Low cost– Small form factor
Core Components• CME6005
• 40-120 kHz, can receive WWVB, DCF77, JJY, MSF and HBG• less than 90 uA in active mode and 0.03 uA when standby
• PIC16LF1827• 600 nA in sleep mode with a 32 KHz timer active• 800 uA when running at 4 MHz
• Costs (as of 2010)• CME6005: $1.5• PIC16LF1827: $1.5• Antenna: $1• Total: $4
Time in NMEA format
& 1-pulse-per-second
Most of the timeReading bits & Writing to the uart
Drop-in replacement of GPS
Decoder Loop
• Every second– MCU decodes the next bit from the signal receiver
• Every minute– MCU decodes the UTC time stream– MCU sends the time stream to the uart
Experiment Configurations
• Multiple motes, each connected to a receiver• One master mote• All motes are wired together– Master mote sends a pulse through a GPIO pin every 6
seconds– All motes timestamp this pulse as the synchronization ground
truth• For WWVB, the distance is 2,400 km (indoor & outdoor),
mainly sky wave• For DCF77, the distance is 700 km (indoor), mainly
ground wave
Near the edge of the coverage map
Accuracy• The differences of the time readings at the
motes when the master mote sends the pulses
Clock frequencies vary more in outdoor
experiment
50% 80% 90%
Indoor < 1.3 ms < 2.8 ms < 3.9 ms
Outdoor < 1.4 ms < 3.0 ms < 4.3 ms
Comparison with FTSP
• FTSP sync accuracy depends on resync frequency– Because clock frequency varies over time
Clock Frequency Variations
Motes were placed together under a tree.
Avg Hourly Variation
Max Hourly Variation
Indoor 0.09 ppm 0.67 ppm
Outdoor 0.36 ppm 6.68 ppm
Power Consumption
• What happens as sync interval T increases?• Schmid et al. observed that FTSP syncs in the
millisecond range when using T = 500 seconds interval
FTSPTime signal
receiverSync error in
milliseconds range
Qualitative Observations
• Steel frame buildings completely shield the time signal
• Brick buildings allow signal reception• Laptops (when using AC power), oscilloscopes
can easily interfere the time signal within a few meters– We used a portable logic analyzer connected to a
laptop running on its battery
Applications
• Synchronous MAC Protocols• Latency Reduction• Sparse Networks• Drop-in Replacement for GPS• Network-Wide Wakeup• Failure-Prone Sensor Networks
Summary
• Lower power consumption in the millisecond range
• Support sparse networks• Provides an appropriate solution to the
milliseconds and seconds range– GPS is an overkill– RTC drifts a few minutes per year even with
temperature compensation