Upload
angel-mcdowell
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ulnar artery intervention non inferior to radial approach: Reality or myth? AJmer
ULnar ARtery working group study.A randomized parallel group Non-Inferiority trial
Rajendra Gokhroo, MD,DM,FACCKamal Kishor, Bhanwar Ranwa, Devendra Bisht,
Sajal Gupta, A Avinash
AJULAR
AJULAR
Disclosures
Nothing to disclose by any author.
AJULAR
Background
• Worldwide radial artery cannulation has been accepted as a default technique for coronary access because of obvious safety advantages over femoral access.
AJULAR
Limitations of Radial Access
– Frequent vasospasm, – More anatomical variation, – Small caliber and– Unsuitability of radial artery to be used as graft for
CABG after cannulation.
AJULAR
• Can Ulnar artery be a viable alternative to radial artery for coronary access ?
AJULAR
Scenario Till Date.. Trans ulnar access is inferior to Trans radial
Events(%)– MACE: 2.8 vs 3.4 P value<0.0001– Large hematoma: 3.2 vs 0.5 P value=0.03 (crossed non-inferiority)
– Spasm: 12.7 vs 16.9 P value=0.4– Vagal Reaction: 2.6 vs 2.3 P value=0.0002– Arterial Occlusion: 10.4 vs 8.9 P value=0.47– Crossover: 32.3 vs 5.9 P Value=0.004 (crossed non-inferiority)
The AURA of ARTEMIS Study .Circ Cardiovasc Interv.2013;6:252-261
AJULAR
Scenario Till Date..
Limitations– Inexperienced Ulnar operators.– Attempted to cannulate even nearly absent ulnar
artery.
“…High crossover rate in Transulnar cannulation group made it inferior to Trans Radial cannulation….”
The AURA of ARTEMIS Study .Circ Cardiovasc Interv.2013;6:252-261
AJULAR
•Does Experience Matter?
AJULAR
Our observation:
%
AJULAR
19
So….. Experience Does Matter..
Does Ulnar artery cannulation still remain inferior, even if performed by an Experienced operator ?
AJULAR
AJULAR StudyPrerequisites
• “..Default radialist with a minimum experience of 50 transulnar cannulations ..”
• “…Cannulation attempted only if ulnar artery easily palpable and anatomy is favorable….”
AJULAR
Trial Design Randomized Single center Non-Inferiority Trial
Primary end PointComposite of MACEs ,major vascular
events (large hematoma and occlusion) during hospital stay and crossover rate.
Secondary end Points•Individual Components of Primary end Points•Spasm. •Failed attempts( > 3 attempts)•Total procedural and fluoroscopy time, •Amount of contrast used
AJULAR
Exclusion Criteria
• Inability to palpate either radial or ulnar artery,• Primary angioplasty,• Cardiogenic shock, • Patients on chronic hemodialysis,• Vasospastic disease (Raynaud’s disease),• Severe forearm skeletal deformities,• Post CABG.
AJULAR
Patient Flow During StudyInformed Consent from all patients
Approved by Institute Ethical Committee
AJULAR
Primary End Points
AJULAR
% %
%Composite of
•MACEs •Major vascular events (large hematoma and occlusion) during hospital stay and •Crossover rate.
MACE’s
AJULAR
%%
%
Large Hematoma
AJULAR
%%
%
Crossover
AJULAR
%%
% 4.43.8
Spasm
AJULAR
%%
%
Intention to treat Analysis
AJULAR
M
Zone of Non-Inferiority
‘M’ indicates Non-Inferiority Margin, 1.93 in this case
Per Protocol Analysis
Zone of Non-Inferiority
M‘M’ indicates Non-Inferiority Margin, 1.93 in this case
AJULAR
AJULAR
So Obvious advantage…
• … if you have expertise in ulnar cannulation, 75% of femoral artery cannulations can be avoided ….
Take Home Message
1. Trans Ulnar cannulation is also an easy, safe and comfortable procedure.
2. If used as a default strategy it is non-inferior to transradial approach, when performed by an experienced operator – “It’s Reality, not a myth”.
AJULAR
Thanks
Thank you for your attention.
AJULAR