UDF-2-A

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2-A

    1/4

    1

    December4,2015

    Mr.LarryAutrey

    ManagingPartner

    WhitleyPennLLP

    8343DouglasAvenue,Suite400

    Dallas,Texas

    75225

    Mr.JamesPenn

    Mr.B.GlenWhitley

    1400West7thStreet,Suite400

    FortWorth,Texas76102

    Gentlemen:

    OnNovember24,2015,UnitedDevelopmentFundingIII,L.P.(UDFIII),UnitedDevelopmentFundingIV(UDFIV),United

    DevelopmentFundingIncomeFundV(UDFV),andUnitedMortgageTrust(UMT)(collectively,theCompanies)each

    filedan8KwiththeSecuritiesandExchangeCommission(SEC)statingthatWhitleyPenn,LLPhasdeclinedtostandfor

    reappointmentas

    the

    Companys

    independent

    registered

    public

    accounting

    firm,

    and

    its

    declination

    was

    accepted

    by

    the

    Companysauditcommittee. These8Ksfurtherstatethat

    (i) there were no disagreements between the [Companies] and Whitley Penn on any matters of

    accountingprinciplesorpractices, financialstatementdisclosureorauditingscopeorprocedure,which

    disagreements, ifnotresolved to thesatisfactionofWhitleyPenn,wouldhavecausedWhitleyPenn to

    makereferencetothesubjectmatterofthedisagreement in itsreportonthe[Company]sconsolidated

    financial statements, and (ii) there were no reportable events as that term is defined in Item

    304(a)(1)(v)ofRegulationSK.

    WhitleyPennacknowledged thefilingsandagreedwiththestatementsconcerningourfirmcontainedtherein.

    Asyouknow, theCompaniesareaffiliatesofeachother,externallymanagedoradvisedby thesameprincipalgroupof

    related individuals, and generally engage in the business of unregulated lending to residential real estate developers,

    primarilyinNorthTexasandtothesame,smallgroupofdevelopers. AreviewoftheCompaniesperiodicfilings(Forms10

    K,10Q,8K,proxystatementsandofferingdocuments,collectively, theFilings) filedwith theSEC,areviewofcounty

    property records (centralappraisaldistrictsanddeed recordings)andvisits tonumerousprojectanddevelopment sites

    raisesanumberof seriousquestionsabout (i) the legitimacyof the financialandother relationshipsbetweenaffiliated

    entitiesandindividualsand(ii)apparentaccountingirregularities. Inadditiontopotentiallysignificantissuesregardingthe

    adequacyofthedisclosuresintheFilings,italsoappearsthattheremaybematerialmisstatementsintheauditedfinancial

    statementsforthe fiscalyearsending2012,2013and2014,aswellasthe interimquarterlyfilings forthesameperiods.

    These issuesraiseseriousconcernsaboutWhitleyPennspriorauditwork,but,moreimportantly,WhitleyPennsspecific

    representationstoshareholdersandthepublicmarketthattherewerenodisagreementsbetweenthe[Companies]and

    WhitleyPennandnoreportableevents. Asdiscussedbelow,thereareanumberofapparentirregularitiesthatgiverise

    to questions as to (i)whetherWhitley Penn had a reasonable basis formaking the representations contained in the

    Companies Forms 8K (which shareholders and themarket have clearly relied upon) and (ii) whetherWhitley Penn

    intentionally,recklesslyornegligentlyignoredobviousredflags.

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2-A

    2/4

    2

    Entities:

    Entity CommissionFile

    Number

    Corporate

    Address

    TotalAssets

    (BookValue)

    UnitedMortgage

    Trust

    000

    32409

    1301MunicipalWay,Suite220

    Grapevine,Texas76051 $182.3million

    UnitedDevelopmentFundingIII,L.P. 000531591301MunicipalWay,Suite100

    Grapevine,Texas76051$391.6million

    UnitedDevelopmentFundingIV 001364721301MunicipalWay,Suite100

    Grapevine,Texas76051$684.1million

    UnitedDevelopmentFundingIncomeFundV 3331941621301MunicipalWay,Suite100

    Grapevine,Texas76051

    $55.6

    million

    TotalAssets $1.3billion

    RedFlags:

    TheprimaryassetsoftheCompaniesareloans,andthebookvalueofassetsappeartobemateriallyoverstated,

    eitherbecausetheloanshaveinsufficientreservesorhaveinadequatecollateralsupportingthem.

    Loans appear to accrue larger and larger balances for years (more thandoubling in some cases)without ever

    generatinganycash receipts,which leadtoquestionsabout theaccounting treatmentof these loans, including

    howincome

    is

    recognized

    and

    later

    capitalized

    to

    long

    term

    asset

    accounts.

    This

    raises

    serious

    questions

    about

    thecarryingvalueoftheloansandthepotentialformateriallyoverstatedbookvalueofassets.

    Managementfeesareassessedonthevalueofassetsundermanagement. IfthebookvalueoftheCompanies

    assetsismateriallyoverstated,theexternalmanagermayhaveimproperlyreceivedinflatedmanagementfees.

    UDFIVisnotaccruinganyprovisionforloanlossesdespiteamaterialoutstandingbalanceofpastdueloans(loans

    thathavematuredwithoutbeingrepaidorextended).

    UDFIII,UDFIVandUMTarenotreservingagainstcertainloansthathaveahighprobabilityofbeingimpaired(e.g.

    loansthatremainoutstandingbutthathavenotmatured).

    UDFIVs

    largest

    borrower

    is

    aprivate

    real

    estate

    developer

    based

    in

    Farmers

    Branch,

    Texas

    which

    does

    business

    underthenameofCenturionAmericanthroughacomplexwebofaffiliatedentities,whicharecontrolledbyDallas

    businessman, Mehrdad Moayedi (Moayedi) (Moayedi, Centurion American entities and their affiliates are

    collectivelyreferredtoasCenturion). LoanstoUDFIVslargestborrower,Centurion,donotappeartobearms

    lengthtransactions. Theseloansdonotappeartoberepaiduponmaturity,andUDFIVdoesnotappeartoreceive

    anycompensationforsuchextensions.

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2-A

    3/4

    3

    ThelargestborrowerofUDFIIIrepresents43%ofloans. ThelargestborrowerofUDFIVrepresents67%ofloans.

    ThelargestborrowerofUDFVrepresents62%ofloans. Whilethisloanconcentrationisdisclosedindividuallyfor

    eachoftheCompanies,itisnotdisclosedthatthelargestborrowerofeachofUDFIII,UDFIVandUDFVisoneand

    thesameCenturionandthatthereexistsan inherentdefaultriskacrosstheCompaniesassociatedwiththis

    concentration inasingleborrower. Asaconsequence,eachoftheCompaniesfinancialconditionappearstobe

    affectedby,anddependenton,oneanother,whichalsodoesnotappeartobedisclosed.

    The largestborrowerofeachofUDF III,UDF IVandUDFVmaybe insolvent. Thisconcern isbasedon,among

    other information,thefactthat(i)over95%ofthe loans issuedtoCenturionbyUDFIVarenotrepaidwhenthe

    loansmatureandbecomedue;(ii)Centurionrecentlydefaultedonafirstlienloanduetoathirdpartylenderand

    asecond lien loanduetoUDF IVthatwassecuredby land inDentonCounty,Texas; (iii)severalmechanicsand

    materialmans lienshavebeen filed related toCenturion invariousNorthTexascounties,and (iv) theapparent

    inabilityofthisborrowertoservice$585millionindebt(outstandingprincipalbalance)owedtoUDFIIIandUDFIV

    (exclusive of any other debts owed to other entities) as well as approximately $75 million of contractually

    obligatedannualinterestexpense.

    100%ofUDF IV loansareclassifiedasfullycollectable,which is likelyamaterialmisrepresentation ifthe largest

    borrower

    is

    insolvent.

    Material conflicts exist between executives/officers and Centurion, which appear to be negatively affecting

    shareholders. UDFIII,UDFIVandUDFVfailtofullydisclosethebusinessrelationshipsbetweentheirofficersand

    directorsandCenturionasrequiredbyAuditingStandardNo.18RelatedParties.

    UDF IIIandUDF IVssecond largestnonaffiliatedborrower isaprivaterealestatedeveloperbased inAustin,

    Texas,whoseprincipalexecutiveisThomasBuffington(Buffington). SixUDFIVloansrelatedtoBuffingtonhave

    maturedwithoutbeing extendedor repaidbasedondisclosures in the Form10Q filed for thequarter ended

    September30,2015. Buffingtonappearstoaccountforapproximately10%ofUDFIVstotal loanassetsandhas

    past due loans owed to UDF III that represent approximately 25% of UDF IIIs portfolio. The impact of this

    borrowerappearstobematerialasitisthesecondlargestnonaffiliatedborrowerofbothUDFIIIandUDFIV.

    OnoraboutOctober30,2015,alawsuitwasfiledinTravisCounty,Texas,against,amongothers,UDFIV,several

    BuffingtonentitiesandBuffington, individually. SeeHanna/MageeL.P.#1v.BHMHighpointe Ltd.,etal. (Cause

    No.D1GN15004985). Thecomplaintcontainsallegationsoffraud,breachofcontract,tortiousinterferenceand

    fraudulenttransferandalsoincludesspecificclaimsthatmultipleBuffingtonentities(thathavereceivedloansand

    currentlyhaveoutstandingbalancesowedtoUDFIV)areinsolvent.

    OnNovember30,2015,UDFIIIfiledaninvoluntarybankruptcypetitionagainstanentitycontrolledbyBuffington

    in theUnitedStatesBankruptcyCourt for theWesternDistrictofTexas. See In re Lennar Buffington Stonewall

    Ranch, L.P. (W.D. Texas 1511548hcm). The amount of the claim byUDF III against the entity controlled by

    Buffingtonwas$106.5million,whichrepresentsapproximately25%ofUDFIIIstotalassets. Buffingtonand/orhis

    affiliateshavehad,andcontinuetohave,amaterialamountofloanspastdueowedtobothUDFIIIandUDFIV. It

    appearsthat

    neither

    UDF

    III,

    nor

    UDF

    IV

    have

    disclosed

    (i)

    the

    litigation,

    (ii)

    the

    reality

    of

    the

    poor

    financial

    conditionofitssecondlargestnonaffiliatedborroweror(iii)thematerialaffectthisbankruptcyfilingmayhave

    onthefinancialconditionsofUDFIIIandUDFIV.

    There are disclosure issues regarding the percentage of loans that appear to be secured by unimproved real

    property. UDF IIIandUDF IVs largestborrower,Centurion,has receivedover75acquisitionanddevelopment

    loansthattypicallybearinterestat13%orhigher.Innumerousinstances,Centurionhasnotbrokengroundonthe

    developmentfor2,3,5and10yearsafterhavingreceivedthe13%loan.Thisleadstoquestionsabouttheuseof

  • 7/24/2019 UDF-2-A

    4/4

    4

    the loanproceeds(andpotentialmisappropriation ifnotusedfordevelopments)andthevalueoftheunderlying

    collateral.

    UDFVsprincipalbusinessactivityappearstoinvolveissuingloanstospecificCenturionentitiesthathave(orhad)

    loansduetoUDF IIIandUDF IV. UDFVfundsappeartobeusedtorepay loansowedtoUDF IIIandUDF IVby

    Centurion,whichisnotdisclosedtoUDFVshareholders. SimilartoaPonzischeme,itappearsthatUDFVinvestor

    capitalis

    being

    used

    to

    return

    capital

    to

    UDF

    III

    and

    UDF

    IV

    investors.

    UDFV loansarebeing issuedtoUDF IIIandUDF IVs largestborrower,Centurion,andtherelationshipbetween

    CenturionandUDFVsaffiliatesisnotdisclosed. UDFVsFilingsincludeexpressstatementsthat itwillnotmake

    loansto,orparticipateinloanswith,affiliates.However,itappearsthatUDFVsbusinessactivitycontradictsthese

    statementsor,at the very least, contradicts the spiritof thedisclosures asUDFV is indirectly,buteffectively,

    refinancingpastUDFIIIandUDFIVloanswhilenotdirectlyacquiringtheloansfromUDFIIIandUDFIV.

    Insidershavemade loans to themselvesthroughaffiliatesofUMTat interest ratesbelow the10YrUS treasury

    rate in the formofunsecureddeficiencynotes and recourseobligations totaling$73million asof thequarter

    ended September 30, 2015. Insiders lend to themselves at an interest rate of 1.75% to the detriment of

    shareholderswhile the same form of unsecured deficiency notes issued to nonaffiliated parties bear interest

    at14%.

    UDFIIIhad$392millionofassetsand$10millionofdebtasofthequarterendedSeptember30,2015. Despite

    having a nominal amount of debt relative to its assets (which are principally interest bearing loans), UDF III

    consistentlydisclosesthat ithasnotmadepaymentsonitsdebtinatimelymanner,includinginthemostrecent

    quarter. ThisleadstoobviousquestionsaboutthefinancialconditionofUDFIII.

    OnNovember30,2015,UDFVreleasedaForm8KdisclosingthatWilliamKahane,adirectorofUDFVsBoardof

    Directors,hadresigned. Kahanes resignationwaseffectiveasofNovember24,2015,whichwasthesameday

    thatUDFVandtheotherCompanieseachreleasedaForms8KdisclosingthatWhitleyPennwouldno longerbe

    theCompaniesauditor. ItappearsthatKahane isaffiliatedwithARCapital,RCSCapitalandNickSchorsch. AR

    Capital

    is

    or

    was

    a

    co

    sponsor

    and

    external

    advisor

    of

    UDF

    V.

    RCS

    Capital

    raised

    capital

    as

    the

    dealer

    manager

    for

    UDFIVandisraisingorwasraisingcapitalasthedealermanagerofUDFV. LikeWhitleyPenn,UDFVsForm8K

    disclosingKahanesresignationclaimedthattheresignationwasnotaresultofanydisagreementwiththeBoard

    ortheTrustonanymatterrelatingtotheTrustsoperations,policiesorpractices. ThetimingofWhitleyPenns

    resignationandKahanesdoesnotappear tobecoincidentaland further raisesquestionsabout theveracityof

    WhitleyPennsrepresentationstoshareholdersandthemarket.

    Insummary,thesered flagsraisesignificantquestionsabout (i)the legitimacyoftheUDFstructure, (ii)the financial

    conditionoftheCompanies,(iii)WhitleyPennspriorauditworkand(iv)theaccuracyoftheCompaniesclaimsand

    Whitley Penns acknowledgement regarding there not being any disagreements betweenWhitley Penn and the

    Companiesandtherenotbeinganyreportableevents. Furtherquestionsarealsoraisedaboutwhethertheseorother

    red flagsmay have beenwillfully or otherwise ignored,whether deficient auditsmay have been conducted, and

    whetherprofessional

    audit

    standards

    may

    have

    been

    violated.

    In

    the

    absence

    of

    any

    disagreements

    between

    the

    CompaniesandWhitleyPennoranyreportableevents,especially in lightoftheobservationsdetailedabove, itbegs

    thequestionastowhyWhitelyPennisnotcontinuingastheauditoroftheCompanies.