Upload
rafe-lawson
View
217
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UBC workshopJanuary 9, 2004
Yves PigneurUniversité de Lausanne
[email protected](+41 21) 692.3416
An ontology for defining e-business modelsAn ontology for defining e-business models
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 2
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Agenda
• Introduction
1. Ontology– Value proposition– Customers, channels and relationship– Capabilities, activities and partnerships– Revenues and cost models
1b Computer-aided design
2. Research methodology– DESIGN SCIENCE
3. IT alignment
• Conclusion– Next: environment assessment …
Research with
Alexander Osterwalder, phd
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 3
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
What is a Business Model anyway?
• A buzzword with no precise definition ?– […] Executives, reporters and analysts who use the term don't have a
clear idea of what it means. They use it to describe everything from how a company earns revenue to how it structures its organization
A business model is– the value a company offers to one or several segments of customers, and
– the architecture of the firm and its network of partners
– for creating, marketing and delivering this value and relationship capital,
– in order to generate profitable and sustainable revenue streams.
[Linder, 2000]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 4
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Why a business model approach?
Business ProcessesInformation systems
Business Model
StrategyPlanninglevel
Architectural level
Implementationlevel
Conceptual architectureof a business strategy
e-Business Technology layer
• Positioning• Objectives & goals• Communication of strategy
Avoid re-inventing strategy
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 5
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Business/IT alignment
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGYFUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION
STRATEGIC FIT AUTOMATION LINKAGE
INT
ER
NA
LE
XT
ER
NA
L
BUSINESS STRATEGY I/T STRATEGY
ORGANIZATIONAL INFRASTRUCTUREAND PROCESSES
IS INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROCESSES
BUSINESSSCOPE
DISTINCTIVE COMPETENCIES
BUSINESSGOVERNANCE
BUSINESSSCOPE
TECHNOLOGYSCOPE
I/TGOVERNANCE
PROCESSES
ARCHITECTURES
SKILLSSKILLS
ADMINISTRATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE
PROCESSES
Businessmodel
[Venkatraman, 1993]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 6
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
State of the Art (I) – e-business models
• Categorization– According different axes (innovation, integration, control …)
– Timmers, Rappa, Tapscott …
• Modeling– Concepts and questions
– Hamel, Afuah, LinderWeill, Rayport, …
• Tools– Computer-aided design
– MIT Process Handbook (Malone)
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 7
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
State of the Art (II) - ontology
• The Enterprise Ontology– collection of terms and definitions relevant to business enterprises
– Activities and processes, organization, strategy, marketing, time
• On-to-knowledge (XML) Content-driven Knowledge-Management through Evolving Ontologies
• Electronic Business (EDI) using XML– «To provide an open XML-based infrastructure enabling the global use
of electronic business information in an interoperable, secure and consistent manner by all parties»
– Other EDI ontology: bizTalk, cXML, CBLScénario
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 8
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
State of the Art (III) – business strategy
• (Un-)bundling the corporation– Product (What?), Customers (Who?), infrastructure (How?)
– Hagel, Markides …
• Competence tree– Knowledge, strategy, value creation
– Giget, …
• Value creation framework– value-creating activities result in
offerings provided to customers
– Ramirez, Wallin, Norman …
WHATWHAT
WHOWHO
HOWHOW
Market
Product
Activities
Capabilities
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 9
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
PART 1. An e-Business Model framework (questions)
Customerrelationship
Customerrelationship
Productinnovation
Productinnovation
FinancialAspects
FinancialAspects
Infrastructureoperation
InfrastructureoperationHOW?
WHO?WHAT?
HOW MUCH?
Who are our customers?
How do we reach them?
How we get and keep our customers?
What are our key competencies?
How we operate and deliver?
How we collaborate?
What do we offer to our customers?
What are our revenues?Our pricing?
What are our costs?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 10
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
An e-Business Model framework (concepts)
Customerrelationship
Customerrelationship
Productinnovation
Productinnovation
FinancialAspects
FinancialAspects
Infrastructureoperation
Infrastructureoperation
Capability
Configuration
Partnership
HOW?
Channel
Customer
Relationship
Proposition
WHAT?
Cost
Revenue
WHO?
HOW MUCH?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 11
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
1. Value proposition
Value Proposition
Offering
setOf isA
• Description• Reasoning (use, risk, effort)
• Life cycle (creation, purchase, use, renewal, transfer)
• Value level (me-too, innovation/imitation, innovation)
• Price level (attractive, market, high-end)
• Categorization (barter, sale, market, buy)
Customer Capability
What do we offer?
ProductInnovation
ProductInnovation
synonym: Benefice
Requires Targeted to
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 12
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Value proposition (definition)
To characterize product innovation, the value proposition
• defines,
• the actual product or service, and
• the value or benefits perceived by customers of the products and services offered by the firm.
• In the case of e-business this offer naturally includes a strong information system component, principally the Internet.
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 13
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Value propositions, capabilities and customers
MJF concerts Festival visitors Attractive MJF venue
MJF off
MJF frequentation
MJF recordings
Sponsors
Record, TV, artists
Shops
Value Proposition Target Customer Capability
Contract stars
Attract people
Atmosphere & Experience
MJF sponsorship
Mobilize Volunteer Staff
MJF Brand & Franchise Franchisees
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 14
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
A detailed value proposition
VALUE PROPOSITION Name: MJF sponsorship
Description: The international reputation and the size of the MJF makes it an ideal partner for sponsorships. With its great concerts, large crowd and international media presence it gives affiliated sponsors a large visibility.
Reasoning: {Use}: An MJF sponsorship contract gives a partner the possibility to potentially address 240'000 people and build be co-branded with the MJF.
{Risk}: As the MJF is an established institution with an established brand and a solid customer base the risk of entering a troubled partnership is very low.
Value level: {Me-too}: The MJF is a mass advertising "media" among others. Thought it is one of the top established festivals the value level of a sponsorship with the MJF is comparable to other festivals.
Price level: {Market}: The price level of a sponsorship at the MJF is situated at market levels.
Composed of OFFERINGs: (the detailed OFFERINGs are captured in annex XXX) Affiliation Advertising space Sponsors' events Free tickets
Value for TARGET CUSTOMER: TARGET CUSTOMER 3: Sponsors
Based on CAPABILITYies: CAPABILITY 2: Attract and feature great stars and concerts
CAPABILITY 4: Attract people
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 15
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
2. Target customers
Customer
Criterion
setOf isA
Value proposition
Community
Segment isA
Who are our customers?
Customerrelationship
Customerrelationship
Targeted to
• Description• Reasoning
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 16
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Segments
• Categorizations of the population into social class or psychologically defined groups
• Area where a firm can specialize and gain competitive advantage– By having lower costs or customer-
satisfying differentiation
– Clear distinction
– Limited set of competitors
– Distinctive supply
– Different purchase criteria
– Barriers to deter new entrants
MJF concerts Festival visitors
MJF off
MJF frequentation
MJF recordings
Sponsors
Record, TV, artists
Shops
Value Proposition Target Customer
MJF sponsorship
MJF Brand & Franchise Franchisees
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 17
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Communities
Group of people or entities– that share values or interests
– and use the le Net regularly &at the same place
transaction Business, trading, occasions, barter …
interest Idea sharing,communication …
fantasy Role games, fantasy world…
relation Assistance (disease), sharing of experiences …
MJF concerts Festival visitors
Value Proposition Target Customer
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 18
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
3. Distribution channel
How do we reach our customers? Feel and serve them?
Channel
Link
setOf isA
CustomerValue proposition
Offering
isA
Internet
Network isA
Call center
Actor by
Delivered through Delivered to
• Description• Reasoning• Customer Buying Cycle• Value Level• Price Level
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 19
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Channel
• A channel can be defined as a set of links or a network via which a firm “goes to market” and delivers its value proposition.
– Owned channels - direct (i.e. Web, phone, fax…)
– Owned channels - indirect (i.e. brand shops)
– Partner channels (intermediation i.e. retail, shops, ...)
• More precisely it defines how a firm is “in touch” with its customers for a variety of tasks
– Customer Buying Cycle (CBC)
– Customer Service Life Cycle (CSLC)The purpose is to make the right quantities of the right products or
services available at the right place, at the right time
The purpose is to make the right quantities of the right products or
services available at the right place, at the right time
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 20
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Distribution channels and links
MJF advertising
MJF concert listing
Free distribution of the MJF program, also as supplement
Advertising for up-coming events
Online program, news feed and real videos
of past concerts
Real videos of past concerts, various
information
www.montreuxjazz.com
MJF event
www.ticket corner.ch
Ticket Corner
MJF program
CHANNEL {Awareness} {Evaluation} {Purchase} {After sales}
Channel strategy at the Montreux Jazz Festival (essentially for Festival visitors)
Emissions, and supplements on the
MJF
Media
www.montreux sounds.com
Artist descriptions, online program, MJF
virtual tour
Ticket office
Online ticketing (48% of tickets) and online shop
Online ticketing
Swiss-wide ticket agency shops
Program distribution
MJF Sponsors
Worldwide promotion
Swiss Tourism: Top Events of
Switzerland
46% of tickets
MJF concert database, taste real
videos
Artist and event descriptions
illustration
Channel
Link
setOf isA
CustomerValue proposition
Offering
isA
Internet
Network isA
Call center
Actor by
Delivered through Delivered to
• Description• Reasoning• Customer Buying Cycle• Value Level• Price Level
Channel
Link
setOf isA
CustomerValue proposition
Offering
isA
Internet
Network isA
Call center
Actor by
Delivered through Delivered to
• Description• Reasoning• Customer Buying Cycle• Value Level• Price Level
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 21
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
MJF Concert ... ... Online ticketing (48% of tickets)
CHANNEL VALUE PROPOSITION
MJF Concert
OFFERINGs of the VALUE PROPOSITION LINKs of the CHANNEL
CHANNEL Name: www.ticketcorner.ch
Description: www.ticketcorner.ch belongs to Ticket Corner and is a partner CHANNEL that sells tickets of various Swiss events from concerts to sports events. They also sell MJF concert tickets.
Reasoning: {Use}: The concerts of the MJF can conveniently be found on the website in the Ticket Corner database.
{Effort}: The customer can comfortably order the tickets over the Internet and get them delivered directly to his home.
Value level: {Me-too}: Online ordering of tickets for a specific event have become quite commonplace.
Price level: {Free}: Customers have to pay a fee for handling an delivery of an order.
Composed of LINKs: MJF concert listing. Online ticketing.
Delivers VALUE PROPOSITION: VALUE PROPOSITION 1: MJF concert (tickets).
Delivers to TARGET CUSTOMER: TARGET CUSTOMER 1: Festival visitors.
A detailed distribution channelillustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 22
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
4. Customer relationship
Relationship
mechanism
setOf isA
• …
CustomerValue proposition
Offering
isA
Retention
Acquisition isA
Add-on selling
How do we get and keep our customers?
Trust
Personalization isA
Security
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 23
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Customer equity
• Customer Acquisition– How do we get customers?
– Growing market share
• Customer Retention– How do we keep customers?
– Nurturing customer loyalty
• Add-on selling– How do we get customers to buy more?
– Enhancing Average Revenue Per User (ARPU)
In some mobile firms,customer acquisition costshad reached almost a quarter of all operating expensessaid Mr Zehle, CEO of
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 24
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
PERSONALIZATION mechanisms
Make recommendation Make recommendation
2
3
4a
5
4b
Establish configuration Establish configuration
Planing of production
Listen to the customerListen to the customer
Distribution
Production (internal)
ERP Outsourcing (external) SCM
One-to-one
Mass-customization
Collaborative
filtering
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 25
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
TRUST & LOYALTY mechanisms
TRUST
SECURITY
PRIVACY
Contribute to the establishment of
BRAND
Notoriety …
Fear: financial losses
Fear: loss of intimacy
INFO- MEDIARY COMMUNITY
Certification
Verification et authorization
Escrow
Notary, payments
Expertise
Guarantee of quality
Rating
Reputation of actors
Insurance
Risk managementContribute
QUALITY
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 26
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
5. Capabilities and resources
Capability
Resource
setOf isA
Value proposition
What are our key competencies?
Actor by
• Description• Reasoning
Business capability
Mgmt capability isA
Infrastructureoperation
Infrastructureoperation
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 27
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Capabilities and resources
• Capability– Repeatable patterns of action in
the use of assets
– Aptitude to exploit and coordinate resources
– to create, produce, and/or offer products and services to a market
• Resource– Assets that are available &
useful
– in detecting and responding to
– market opportunities or threats
OWN
DO
MJF concerts Attractive MJF venue
MJF off
MJF frequentation
MJF recordings
Value Proposition Capability
Contract stars
Attract people
Atmosphere & Experience
MJF sponsorship
Mobilize Volunteer Staff
MJF Brand & Franchise
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 28
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Types of capabilities
external
internal
customersresources
Related to business processes
Related to management processes(decision)
Business modelingcapability• Absorptive capacity• Conceptualizing• timing
[Wallin, 2000] & Synocus
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 29
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
6. Activities and value configurations
• Description• Reasoning
Configuration
Activity
setOf isA
Value propositionCapability
Resource
FitFlowSharing
Value shop
Value chain isA
Value network
How do we operate and deliver?
Actor by
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 30
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Types of value configurations
Value chain
Value shop
Value network
[Stabell, 1998]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 31
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Activities and capabilties
Contract musicians
Recording concerts
Selling recordings
Merchandising
Food & Beverages
Concerts
Advertising the MJF
Ticketing
Contract sponsors
Manage volunteers
Manage JAZZ
Manage infrastructure
Commerce Production
musicians
Sponsors
JAZZ
venues
recordings
Nobs Network
tickets instruments
flow
flow
flow
flow
fit
fit
flow
fit
fit
flow
share
Programming
flow
by MJF
by MJF
by MJF, Ticket Corner
by MFJ, sponsors, media, Swiss tourism, Montreux
by Montreux Sounds
by MJF, artists
by MJF, caterers, Heineken
by shops
by MJF
by MJF
by MJF
by MJF
by MJF, Municipality
by MJF
by MJF
NETWORK PROMOTION
SERVICE PROVISIONING
NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE
fit fit
Define concert date and stage to be filled
list music styles and possible artists
Choose artist Put artist in program
Evaluate concert and ticket sales
Problem finding
see focus
Focus: Programming decomposed into its sub-activities (forming a value shop)
Problem solving
Choice Execution
Evaluation
Activity Resource By ACTOR
Legend
Nobs & staff flow
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 32
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
7. Partnerships
• Description• Reasoning
Partnership
Agreement
setOf isA
Value propositionCapability
Activity
on
Market
Chain isA
Network
How do we collaborate?
Actor by
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 33
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Types of partnerships: cooperation, competition, co-opetation
Pro
du
ctio
n c
ost
Coordination costlow
low
high
high
CHAINCHAIN
manufacturersupplier retailerdistributor buyer
pro
du
ct
MARKETMARKET
Authormarketing
Authormarketing
Distributorinventory
Distributorinventory
sales
Information systemscoordination
contents
sales
Information systemscoordination
contents
Shippingtransporttracking
Shippingtransporttracking
Affiliatesales
Affiliatesales
Customerbuy
content
Customerbuy
content
Bankpayment
Bankpayment
deliver deliver
order
sale ordersales
critics
Credit cardclearance
returns
NETWORKNETWORK
[Malone, 1987]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 34
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
8. Revenue model
Revenue
Pricing
setOf isA
Target CustomersValue proposition
Offering
for
What are our revenues? Our pricing?
Link• Description• Reasoning
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 35
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Revenue models
REVENUE
one time
recurrent
sale
registry
subscription
advertisement
use
Income of the subscription fees to become a memberPaid by the buyer and/or the vendor
transaction
commission Income, percentage of a transaction made by the settlement (affiliate program)
Income of online sales paid by the buyer
Income of the ad banners posted on the shopfrontPaid by the vendor
Phone• registry• subscription• Usage
• Time• Services
combination
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 36
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
9. Cost structure
• Description• Reasoning
Cost
Account
setOf isA
What are our costs?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 37
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Cost structure
Revenues
Total net revenue
Cost of goods sold
Total Costs of goods sold
Gross margin
Total Costs of goods sold
Operating expenses
research and development
sales and marketing
general and administration
Total operating expenses
Operating income (loss)
Income (loss) before tax
Net income (loss)
PROFIT = (P – VC).Q – FC
P the unit price of a product
VC the variable cost of a unit
Q the number of products
sold
FC fixed costs
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 38
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
The e-Business Model Modeling Framework (BM2F)
Channel CustomerPropositionConfigurationCapability
Link CriterionOfferingActivityResource
Cost
Account
Revenue
Pricing
Partnership
Agreement
Relationship
Mechanism
Actor
isa
isa
flowfitshare
ProductInnovation
ProductInnovation
Infrastructureoperation
Infrastructureoperation
Customerrelationship
Customerrelationship
Financialaspects
Financialaspects
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 39
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
An overview business model
VALUE PROPOSITIONs
MJF Concerts MJF off
Frequentation MJF Sponsorship
Festival recordings MJF Brand & Franchise
CAPABILITYies
Atractive MJF venue Contract stars Attract people
Mobilize volunteers Atmosphere & Experience
CUSTOMERs
Festival visitors Shops
Sponsors Record, TV, artists
Franchisees
RELATIONSHIPs
PARTNERSHIPs
Artists, sponsors, shops, F&B, volunteers, media,
infrastructure, general festival partners, "Friends of the Festival", musical
partners, Montreux municipality
ACTORs
Artists, Media, Sponsors, Montreux, Volunteers,
F&B, Merchants, Montreux Sounds, Sunset Music, Swiss Tourism, IJFO,
SMPA
REVENUE MODEL
Ticket sales {41%} Sponsoring {20%}
F&B {28%} Merchandising {5%}
Recordings {4%} Diverse {2%}
COST STRUCTURE
Infrastructure {20%} Artists {29%} F&B {10%}
Merchandising {2%} Production {16%} Fixed costs {15%} Marketing {4%}
Divers {4%}
PROFIT/LOSS
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP
PRODUCT INNOVATION
FINANCIAL ASPECTS
CHANNELs
Montreuxjazz.com MJF event
TicketCorner bricks&clicks MJF program
Media Sponsors
MontreuxSounds.com Swiss tourism TEOS
VALUE CONFIGURATION
Contract musicians, contract sponsors, ticketing,
advertising / concerts, F&B, commerce, merchandising, selling recordings / manage
MJF infrastructure, production, manage JAZZ, manage volunteers, record
concerts
THE MONTREUX JAZZ FESTIVAL BUSINESS MODEL (A BIRD'S EYE VIEW)
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 40
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
PART 1B. Computer-aided design of business models
A model to...– Define– Seize– Describe– Store
... a business model
Application
bla bla
formal modelmanager seize
unstructured
information
Semi –structured information
formalization
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 41
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
A XML e-Business Model Modeling Language (BM2L)
ValueProposition
ValueProposition
Characteristics
SetOfOfferings
SetOfOfferings
OfferingCharacteristics
Description
Name
Offering
ValueLevel
Reasoning
LifeCycle
PriceLevel
Risk
Use
Effort
InnovativeInnovation
MeToo
Excellence
Innovation
Economy
Free
Market
HighEnd
Description
Name
ValueLevel
Reasoning
LifeCycle
PriceLevel
InnovativeInnovation
MeToo
Excellence
Innovation
Economy
Free
Market
HighEnd
Risk
Use
Effort
element
element
element obligatory element
optional element
choice between
sequence of
1 - n elements
Legend
ValuePropositionIDAddressesCustomerIDREFBasedOnCapabilityIDREF
LifeCyclePhase{Creation, Purchase, Use,Renewal, Transfer}
LifeCyclePhase{Creation, Purchase, Use,Renewal, Transfer}
OfferingID
for computer-aided business modeling
Protégé-2000an ontology editor anda knowledge-base editor.
also …
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 42
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
A BM2L document
<Product><ValueProposition ValuePropositionID="vp1" BasedOnCapabilityIDREF="cp4 cp3 cp1" AddressesCustomerIDREF="tc4"><ValuePropositionCharacteristics><Name>MJF Concerts</Name><Description>The main attraction and VALUE PROPOSITION of the MJF are its prestigious concerts with stars from jazz, pop, rock, hip-hop and more. The MJF has made itself a name with the regular by unforgettable jazz musicians like Miles Davis, Keith Jarett, Charlie Mingus, Ella Fitzgerald and later from other fields like Bob Dylan, Phil Collins or Guru's Jazzmatazz. The 2003 event featured artists across the musical range, such as George Benson, Joao Gilberto, Simply Red or Cypress Hill. </Description><Reasoning><Use>For the customer the value essentially lies in going to the concert of the artist of his choice.</Use></Reasoning><ValueLevel><MeToo>The MJF may be special because of its quality but it is not substantially different from other jazz festivals throughout the world.</MeToo></ValueLevel><PriceLevel><Market>The MJF ticket prices are comparable to the market prices of what is paid for other concerts.</Market></PriceLevel></ValuePropositionCharacteristics>
EXTRACT
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 43
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Generating documents from a BM2L document
XSLProcessor
BM2LDocument
XSL StylesheetDocument
HTML Document
SVG Document
PDF Document
Word Document
e.g. a two page overview of a company’s business model
e.g. a ten page report of a company’s business model
e.g. a detailed n-page description of the company’s business model
e.g. a graphical view of a business model issue such as the channel strategy
BM2LSchema
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 44
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
PART 2. Research methodology: DESIGN SCIENCE
[March & Smith, 1995, 2004]
Build Evaluate
Construct LANGUAGE
Model USES
Method PROCESSES
InstantiationWORKING SYSTEM
RESEARCH PROCESSES
RE
SE
AR
CH
AR
TIF
AC
TS
• A problem-solving approach (engineering, artificial science)
“Create innovations that define ideas, practices, technical capabilities, and products through which the analysis, design, implementation, and use of information systems can be effectively and efficiently accomplished”
The goal is utility
Vs. Behavioral science
Development and justification of theoriesthat explains or predict phenomena
Goal is truth
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 45
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Build and Evaluate
BUILD Outcome EVALUATE Method
Construct Provides the language
The e-Business Model Ontology
Completeness, Understandability
Literature Review,
Interviews, Cases
ModelUses the construct to represent real world situations
Uses of the e-Business Model
Ontology
Fidelity with real world
phenomena, Completeness
Literature Review,
Interviews, Cases, MJF Case Study
Method Defines processesGuidance for
defining business models
Appropriateness
Literature, Instantiation,
MJF Case Capture
InstantiationShows that […] can be implemented in a working system
BM2L and prototype ApplicabilityMJF Case Capture
UTILITY
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 46
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Evaluating the Business Model Ontology
Evaluation
Compare ontology with literature
Test ontology in the field
Test ontology vs. other model in the field
Evaluate ontology by practitioners
Test ontology with case studies
Interest by the research community
Positioning the ontology to the existing business model literature shows which domains are covered or not and is an indicator of completeness.
Interviewing managers and consultants on the ontology gives an indication on its ability to describe the business logic of a firm.
Describing a real world business model through the ontology's rigorous formalism tests its applicability to case studies.
Observing the research community's interest in the ontology demonstrates certain aspects of its validity.
Testing the ontology in the field would take place indirectly through applying an instantiation of it to a real-world business setting.
Testing two models' performance would also be indirect by applying them to a real-world business setting and compare the outcome.
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 47
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Compare with literature
Revenue Model
Cost Structure
PartnershipCapabilityValue Configuration
Customer Relationship
Distribution Channel
Target Customer
Value Proposition
Business model ontology
Stähler
√√√√√√Weill and Vitale
√√√√√√Petrovic, Kittl et al.
√√√√√√Gordijn
√√√√√√Afuah and Tucci
√√Tapscott, Ticoll et al.
√√√√√Linder and Cantrell
√√√√√√√√√Hamel
Revenue Model
Cost Structure
PartnershipCapabilityValue Configuration
Customer Relationship
Distribution Channel
Target Customer
Value Proposition
Business model ontology
Stähler
√√√√√√Weill and Vitale
√√√√√√Petrovic, Kittl et al.
√√√√√√Gordijn
√√√√√√Afuah and Tucci
√√Tapscott, Ticoll et al.
√√√√√Linder and Cantrell
√√√√√√√√√Hamel
Is the ontology complete?
Have we made any progress?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 48
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Semi-structured interviews with practitioners
Question Domain Questions
Questions on the use of business concepts & tools
How do you plan the general business objectives of your company? Do you use any conceptual tools to plan your business or to sketch the general direction in which your firm is heading?
If yes, do you use any specific formalism(s) to do this?
If yes, do you use any specific software tool to do this? If yes, which one(s)?
Demonstrations & Explanation of the Ontology
easyJet.com, ColorMailer, Barnes & Noble, Nokia
Questions on the fidelity with real word phenomena
In your opinion, what elements are missing in the model presented before?
In your opinion, what elements should not belong to the model presented before?
How could such a model help you define business indicators?
How could such a model help you or a group of managers make better decisions?
How could such a model improve some parts of strategic planning?
How could such a model make it easier to chose and design appropriate information systems (e.g. software purchases like Customer Relationship Management or Supply Chain Management...)
How would it be able to foster innovation in a company with such a model?
How do you think such a model could improve business process design and engineering?
How could it be helpful to have such a model to communicate your business model. (when making decisions, to communicate with employees)
Final discussion Do you have any final comments?
Fidelity with real world phenomena?
Potential applications of the business model concept and ontology?
Use of concepts and tools?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 49
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Interview outcome
employees
use of concepts
use of tools
trial & error
defining indicators
improving decision
making
improving strategic
planning
helping in the design of IS
s
increasing innovation
improving process design
improving com
munication
Retail over Internet 3 little no yes q1 q2 q3 q4 q5
Software in the mobile industry 5 little no yes q6 q7 q8 q9 q10
Service over Internet 15 no no yes q11 q12 q13 q14 q15
Service in Finance 31 no no no q16 q17
Internet Industry Platform 80 yes no yes q18 q19 q20 q21
Industry 400 yes no no q22 q23 q24 q25 q26
Entertainment10-
1200no no yes q27
Transport 3'315 no no yes q28 q29 q30 q31
Consultant 1 yes no - q32q33, q34
q35 q36 q37 q38
Consultant 2 yes no - q39 q40 q41 q42 q43
Consultant 3 yes no - q44
green = positive answers, red = negative answers, grey = neutral answers, white = not answered q = quotes
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 50
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Montreux Jazz Festival Case Study
VALUE PROPOSITIONs
MJF Concerts MJF off
Frequentation MJF Sponsorship
Festival recordings MJF Brand & Franchise
CAPABILITYies
Atractive MJF venue Contract stars Attract people
Mobilize volunteers Atmosphere & Experience
CUSTOMERs
Festival visitors Shops
Sponsors Record, TV, artists
Franchisees
RELATIONSHIPs
PARTNERSHIPs
Artists, sponsors, shops, F&B, volunteers, media,
infrastructure, general festival partners, "Friends of the Festival", musical
partners, Montreux municipality
ACTORs
Artists, Media, Sponsors, Montreux, Volunteers,
F&B, Merchants, Montreux Sounds, Sunset Music, Swiss Tourism, IJFO,
SMPA
REVENUE MODEL
Ticket sales {41%} Sponsoring {20%}
F&B {28%} Merchandising {5%}
Recordings {4%} Diverse {2%}
COST STRUCTURE
Infrastructure {20%} Artists {29%} F&B {10%}
Merchandising {2%} Production {16%} Fixed costs {15%} Marketing {4%}
Divers {4%}
PROFIT/LOSS
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP
PRODUCT INNOVATION
FINANCIAL ASPECTS
CHANNELs
Montreuxjazz.com MJF event
TicketCorner bricks&clicks MJF program
Media Sponsors
MontreuxSounds.com Swiss tourism TEOS
VALUE CONFIGURATION
Contract musicians, contract sponsors, ticketing,
advertising / concerts, F&B, commerce, merchandising, selling recordings / manage
MJF infrastructure, production, manage JAZZ, manage volunteers, record
concerts
THE MONTREUX JAZZ FESTIVAL BUSINESS MODEL (A BIRD'S EYE VIEW)
VALUE PROPOSITIONs
MJF Concerts MJF off
Frequentation MJF Sponsorship
Festival recordings MJF Brand & Franchise
CAPABILITYies
Atractive MJF venue Contract stars Attract people
Mobilize volunteers Atmosphere & Experience
CUSTOMERs
Festival visitors Shops
Sponsors Record, TV, artists
Franchisees
RELATIONSHIPs
PARTNERSHIPs
Artists, sponsors, shops, F&B, volunteers, media,
infrastructure, general festival partners, "Friends of the Festival", musical
partners, Montreux municipality
ACTORs
Artists, Media, Sponsors, Montreux, Volunteers,
F&B, Merchants, Montreux Sounds, Sunset Music, Swiss Tourism, IJFO,
SMPA
REVENUE MODEL
Ticket sales {41%} Sponsoring {20%}
F&B {28%} Merchandising {5%}
Recordings {4%} Diverse {2%}
COST STRUCTURE
Infrastructure {20%} Artists {29%} F&B {10%}
Merchandising {2%} Production {16%} Fixed costs {15%} Marketing {4%}
Divers {4%}
PROFIT/LOSS
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP
PRODUCT INNOVATION
FINANCIAL ASPECTS
CHANNELs
Montreuxjazz.com MJF event
TicketCorner bricks&clicks MJF program
Media Sponsors
MontreuxSounds.com Swiss tourism TEOS
VALUE CONFIGURATION
Contract musicians, contract sponsors, ticketing,
advertising / concerts, F&B, commerce, merchandising, selling recordings / manage
MJF infrastructure, production, manage JAZZ, manage volunteers, record
concerts
THE MONTREUX JAZZ FESTIVAL BUSINESS MODEL (A BIRD'S EYE VIEW)
fidelity with real world phenomena?
applicability of ontology?
applicability of prototype?
completeness?
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 51
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Case studies & use by others
Company & industry sector Company information
Logifleet – Fleet management systems provider Swiss startup founded in 2002
Factory121 – personalized Swiss watch retailing over the Internet Swiss startup founded in 2003
LeLivre –book retailing over the Internet Subsidiary of book retailer Librairies La Fontaine SA
Ellipse – bricks & clicks book retailing Swiss bookstore founded in 1984
NetMovies – DVD rental over the Internet Subsidiary of Aleance (USA) founded in 2001
MNC – mobile phone services (SMS) Swiss Telecom service provider founded in 1998
Adrenalink – sports marketing and management consultancy Swiss consultancy
Phone-Plus – telecommunication services reseller Belgian venture established in 1999
ZenithVie – life insurance Swiss company
Closed interview questions rated between 1 and 5 (1 = very definitely not, 3 = to some extent, 5 = very definitely) average
Did the concepts exposed in the course "Stratégies et technologies de l'information" allow you to accurately describe the business model of the company you analyzed?
3.89
How closely do the elements of the sample document cover the aspects of the business model analyzed? 4
Was the concept "proposition de valeur" relevant to describe the business model you analyzed? 4.44
Was the concept "clients et canaux de distributions" relevant to describe the business model you analyzed? 3.78
Was the concept "relation-client et confiance" relevant to describe the business model you analyzed? 3.78
Was the concept "activités et compétence" relevant to describe the business model you analyzed? 3.89
Was the concept "partenariat" relevant to describe the business model you analyzed? 4.11
In your opinion is the business model concept useful? 4.33
Fidelity with real world phenomena?
Is the business model concept applicable?
Appropriateness of the building block concepts?
Masters Student’s
Class Work & thesis
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 52
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Design science research guidelines
A more formal proof of concept using the guidelines …
1. Problem relevance
2. Research rigor
3. Design as a search process
4. Design as an artefact
5. Design evaluation
6. Research contributions
7. Research communication
Coming …
UTILITY[March & Smith, 1995, 2004]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 53
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
PART 3. Business/IT alignment
HYPOTHESIS
• A formal business model should make easier the business/IT alignment
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY
Businessmodel
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 54
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Business model and business/IT alignment
Application infrastructure
Communication
Data management
IT management
Security
Architecture & standards
IT research & development
IT education
IT infrastructure
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY
Customerrelationship
Customerrelationship
Productinnovation
Productinnovation
FinancialAspects
FinancialAspects
Infrastructureoperation
Infrastructureoperation
IT application portfolio
STRATEGIC TURNAROUND
FACTORY SUPPORT
CUSTOMER
INNOVATION
FINANCE
PROCESSES
IS roleIS sourcingIS structure
InfusionPROSPECTOR
AllianceANALYZER
UtilityDEFENDER
Balanced ScoreCard
Alignment profile
1
2
3
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 55
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Payment infrastructure
MJF Telekurs Multipay
Bank
transactions
clearing
statement $ account
Ergonomics
application
Web Application
Docking Station
transaction information
merchant physical sync
merchant
$
$
Shop Telekurs
Multipay
Bank
transaction
clearing
statement $ account
JAZZ $
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 56
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
IT infrastructure
Application infrastructure
Communication
Data management
IT management
Security
Architecture & standards
IT research & development
IT education
TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY[Weill & Vitale, 2002]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 57
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
IT infrastructureillustration
Application infrastructure
Communication
Data management
IT management
Security
Architecture & standards
IT research & development
IT education
IT infrastructure
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 58
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Application portfolio
STRATEGIC
Applicationsthat are criticalto sustaining future
KEY OPERATIONAL
Applicationsthat are essentialfor success
HIGH POTENTIAL
Applicationsthat may be importantIn achieving the future
SUPPORT
Applicationsthat are valuablefor success
High STRATEGIC IMPACT OF IT low
Hig
h
I
MP
OR
TA
NC
E O
F I
T A
PP
LIC
AT
ION
S
low
EMERGING
GROWTH
DECLINE
MATURITY
12
43
McFarlan
TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY[Ward, 2002]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 59
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Application portfolio
IT application portfolio
STRATEGIC POTENTIAL
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT
.
Activities Strategic Key Operational Support High Potential Contracting musicians Database, Office Contracting sponsors Ticketing Website
(NAGRA system) Reservation System Accounting
Promotion Website Mailing Database, Office
CMS
Concerts (NAGRA System) Production F&B (NAGRA System) Paycenter Accounting, Office Commerce (NAGRA System) Paycenter Accounting, Office Merchandising (NAGRA System) Paycenter Accounting, Office Website Selling recordings Concert Database Accounting, Office Website
(Music downloading) manage MJF infrastructure Production Production JAZZ currency & CASH Paycenter & Views Accounting, Office Volunteer management (NAGRA system) Volunteer Database Volunteer Database,
Office
illustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 60
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Balanced Scorecard (BSC)[Kaplan & Norton, 1992]
Customerperspective
Customerperspective
Innovationperspective
Innovationperspective
Financialperspective
Financialperspective
Processperspective
Processperspective
How do the customers perceive us?
In which process do we have to prove excellence?
How to improve our services and our quality?
How do shareholder perceive us?
CUSTOMER
Goals Measures
& initiatives
INNOVATION
Goals Measures
& initiatives
FINANCE
Goals Measures
& initiatives
PROCESSES
Goals Measures
& initiatives
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 61
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Balanced Scorecard (BSC)
INNOVATION
CUSTOMERS
INFRASTRUCTURE
FINANCE
illustration
CUSTOMER
INNOVATION
FINANCE
PROCESSES
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 62
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Alignment profiles
ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION
Business
model
[Hirschheim, 2001]
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 63
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Alignment profilesillustration
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 64
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
CONCLUSION. Alignment with the environment
STRATEGYSTRATEGY
ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY
1Business
model
Evolutionmodel Environment
model
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
2
EVOLUTION3
NEXT …
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 65
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
Assessing a technology environment
Observation & capture
STUDY
Multi-perspective
MODELREPRESENTATION
LANDSCAPEm-Business
CustomerMarket
CustomerMarket
Productinnovation
Productinnovation
Financialaspects
Financialaspects
InfrastructureIndustry
InfrastructureIndustry
Analysis & visualization
TOOL
NEXT …
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 66
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
A framework for assessing a technology environment
uncertain
complex disruptive
ISSUE
ACTOR USE
Env
iron
men
tO
ntol
ogy
Ana
lysi
s
Five forces analysis Policy network analysis
Structural analysisActor-issue analysis
Disruption analysisAdoption analysis
Analysis & visualization
TOOL
Multi-perspective
MODEL
for assessing environment (present) and designing scenarios (future)
Research with
Giovanni Camponovo, phd
© 2004 Pigneur
UBC January 2004 67
Université de Lausanne
DOC | AGENDA | FIN
A DSS tool for assessing a technology environment
Multi-Actor Strategic Analysis Model
WLAN
Example
Monzani, Bendahan & PigneurBest paper HICSS-37 (2004)