Tutorial on Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) in Hybrid ...vppc2010.univ-lille1.fr/uploads/PDF/VPPC-10-Pres-tutorial-EMI.pdf · Introduction to EMC Phenomena EMI Generated by Rapid

Dr. James Gover, IEEE Fellow

Professor of Electrical Engineering, Kettering University

Retired, Sandia National Laboratories – 35 Years

Ph.D. Nuclear Engineering

MS & BS Electrical Engineering

Tutorial on

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) in

Hybrid Vehicles

Introduction to EMC Phenomena

EMI Generated by Rapid Changes in Electric Currents and Voltages

These Features Are Inherent in Power Electronics

The US Automotive Sector Traditionally Treats EMC as a Testing Discipline

EMI Big Picture

ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE or CROSS TALK IN VICTIM

RADIATED CAPACITIVE OR ELECTRIC FIELD

COUPLING

RADIATED INDUCTIVE OR MAGNETIC FIELD

COUPLING

COMMON IMPEDANCE

USUALLY GROUND

SHIELDED SOURCE

GROUNDED SHIELD

SHIELDING, FIELD CANCELLATION &

ATTENUATION

ISOLATE

FILTER NOISE FROM VICTIM

UNSHIELDED SOURCE

TIME CHANGING CURRENT, I1 AND/OR VOLTAGE, V1 SOURCES

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

+dt

dILM

1

dt

dVCM

1

Electric Power Sources of EMI in Vehicles

– Ignition system

– Relays and Solenoids

– Modulated dc for interior lighting

– Voltage sag from engine starting

– Inductive load kicks

– Alternator load dump

– Power electronics

• Radiated Power Due to PWM Switching

• Conducted Output Ripple into Power System

– Cables Connecting these Power Sources to Loads Act as Antennas

– Gap Antennas Can Exist Between the Chassis and the Metal Cover of Products.

Radiated High Frequency EMI Classifications

• Near Field

– “Close to Source”: Wave impedance (ratio of

electric and magnetic field) depends on

characteristics of the source, e.g., a source with low

current and high voltage tends to generate an

electric field.

• Far Field

– “Away from Source”: Wave impedance (ratio of

electric and magnetic field) is constant and equal to

377 ohms.

Two Approaches to Dealing with High Frequency Noise

• Suppress it at source

• Prevent it from entering the victims’

environment by using filters, shields

and grounding methods

Impact of Ground Impedance on

Circuits with Common Grounds:common impedance coupling

0V

1 2I I

1GZ 2GZ

Circuit

I

Circuit

II

1V

2V

1I 2I

Common

Ground

Return

1 0 1 1G 2 2G 1 2

2 0 2 2G 1G 1 1G 2 1

V V I Z I Z V depends on I

V V I Z Z I Z V depends on I

GGG

G

ZIZZIVV

ZIIVV

1121202

12101

][

][

Analysis of Effect of Common Ground Impedance

50 Ohms

L1 L2

Voltage Source = 10Sin wtf = 100 MHz

V1 V2 L1/L2 V1 V210nH/10nH 9.55v 9.48v50nH/50nH 5.92v 4.98v10nH/50nH 9.26v 8.11v50nH/10nH 6.01v 5.94v

Avoidance of Common Return Path

Bosch, p66

Consider Signal Return Current for Time Dependent Source

R1

Ground

I

1

Vs Is

I1-IS

Low Frequency Return Current Zero Impedance Ground

KVL Gives

I R j L I j M

But M L Therefore

I Ij L

R j L

I

j

R

LShield Cut off

For I

For I I

S S S

S

S

S

S S SCO

SCO

S

S

SCO S

SCO S

:

( )

, ; ,

, ;

,

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

R1

Ground

I

1

I1-IS

IS

R1RSLS

IS

I1-IS

M

I

1

Vs

Vs

KVL Loop

Plot of Analysis

1ˆ

ˆ

I

IS

S

SSCO

L

R

1

SCO

S

jI

I

1

1

ˆ

ˆ

1

Shield Cut-Off Frequencies

Cable Impedance

(Ohms)

Shield Cut-Off

Frequency (kHz)

5XShield Cut-Off

Frequency (kHz)

RG-6A Coax 75 0.6 3.0

RG-213 Coax 50 0.7 3.5

RG-214 Coax 50 0.7 3.5

RG-62A Coax 93 1.5 7.5

RG-59C Coax 75 1.6 8.0

RG-58C Coax 50 2.0 10.0

754E ShTWP 125 0.8 4.0

24G ShTWP 2.2 11.0

22G ShTWP 7.0 35.0

24G ShSingle 4.0 20.0

Henry W. Ott, Noise Reduction Techniques in Electrical Systems, Wiley, 1988, p. 47

Shield Current for Resistive Ground

R1

Ground Resistance RG

I1-IS IS

IS

I1

R1

LS

M=LS

RS

S

GS

S

G

SG

GS

GSSSSS

L

RR

L

R

j

j

RR

R

I

I

RIILjIRLjIKVL

21

2

1

1

11

,,

)1(

)1(

~

~

0)~~

(~

)(~

:

~

I1

RG I1-IS

Plot for Resistive Ground

1ˆ

ˆ

I

IS

S

S

L

R1

1

S

GS

L

RR 2

GS

G

RR

R

At High Frequency (50 MHz-1GHz) the Ground Return Impedance Is

Dominated by Inductance

-35.4x 10 / inch -365.9 x 10 /inch

-48.44 x 10 /inch -325.9 x 10 /inch

9.43 / inch

# 28 Gauge copper wire (Radius = 6.3 mils)

DC Resistance

AC Resistance @ 100 MHz

# 20 Gauge copper wire (Radius = 16 mils)

DC Resistance

AC Resistance @ 100 MHz

Z inductance @ 100 MHz

Minimizing Ground Impedance at High Frequency

Means Minimizing Inductance of the Return Path

How to Connect Low Frequency Signals and Avoid Electromagnetic

Field Radiation

R1

Ground

I

Vs I1

H dl IENCLOSED

0

How to Connect Low Frequency Signals and Avoid Electromagnetic

Field Radiation

R1

Ground

I1

Vs I1

H dl IENCLOSED

0

EMC Hardening of Prius

Shielded High Voltage

Battery Tray

High Voltage Circuits with Noise Filters

Shielded Motor and Power Control Unit

Power Lines Shielded by

Coaxial Cable

Power Line Connectors Shieldedby Aluminum Diecast

Electromagnetic Field Countermeasures in Prius

During development strong EM fields noticed inside and outside of Prius

Several countermeasures were taken Use shielded coaxial DC power transmission

Shield cases for storing high voltage parts in Engine compartment

High voltage battery in trunk

Countermeasures resulted in EM fields inside and outside of Prius at same level of gasoline engine vehicles

The EM field from the Prius is less than approximately 1/300 in 50-60Hz range of ICNIRP criteria. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

What Are TEM Electromagnetic Waves?

• A TEM electromagnetic wave has an electric field wave and a magnetic field wave

• Both waves are traveling in the same direction

• The waves are perpendicular to each other

• The electric field wave is related to the magnetic field wave through Maxwell’s Equations

What Is Their Relationship?

• The ratio of the electric field intensity, E,

to the magnetic field intensity, H, is the

impedance, , of the medium through

which the wave is traveling. For free

space,

= 377 ohms.

Differential Equations for TEMWave Propagation- Phasor Domain

Sinusoid Sources

0~

~)(

))((

0~

~

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

y

y

x

x

Hdy

Hd

andofdefinitionj

jj

Edy

Ed

Solution to ODE: TEM Wave in Lossy Medium

jzjzmjzjzmy

zjzm

zjzmx

zmzmy

z

m

z

mx

eeeE

eeeE

H

eeEeeEE

zteE

zteE

tzH

zteEzteEtzE

)cos()cos(),(

)cos()cos(),(Forward traveling wave +z direction

Forward traveling wave +z direction

Backward traveling wave -z direction


TIME DOMAIN

PHASOR DOMAINForward traveling wave +z direction

Forward traveling wave +z direction



The Electric Dipole-Phasor Domain

I

Z

X

YL

H

Er

E

{ }

{ }

{ }

H H E

HIL

Sinj

r re

EIL

Cosr

j

re

EIL

Sinj

r r

j

re

r

j r

r

j r

j r

0

4

1

24

1

4

1

0

2

0 0

2 2

0 0

2

0

2 2

0

3 3

0 0

2

0 0

2 2

0

3 3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

02 1

, ,v

f T

r

Clayton Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility, Wiley, 1992, p. 178

Near Field of Electric Dipole

I

Z

X

YL

H

Er

E

{ }

{ }

{ }

HIL

Sinj

r re

EIL

Cosr

j

re

EIL

Sinj

r r

j

re

j r

r

j r

j r

4

1

24

1

4

1

0

2

0 0

2 2

0 0

2

0

2 2

0

3 3

0 0

2

0 0

2 2

0

3 3

0

0

0

r


( ) ( )

( )

( )

ZE

H

j

r r

j

r

j

r r

Wave Impedance

Z Far Field

Zj

r rNear Field r

W

W

W

0

0 0

2

0

3

0 0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

90 1

Electric Dipole Far Field(retaining only 1/r terms)

I

Z

X

YL

H

Er

E

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( , ) [ ( ) ]

( , ) [ { }]

( , ) [ { }]

H farj IL

Sine

ra

E far E far

E farj IL

Sine

ra

E r t e E far e a

E r tE

rSin t

r

va

H r tE

rSin t

r

va

E

j r

r

j r

far

j t

far

M

far

M

M

0

0 0

0

0 0

4

4

0

0

0 0

4

ILSin

0

0

0

0

0

0

02

, ,v

f

r


Ratio of Far Fields from Electric Dipole

E r tE

rSin t

r

va

H r tE

rSin t

r

va

E r t

H r t

far

M

far

M

far

far

( , ) [ { }]

( , ) [ { }]

( , )

( , )

0

0 0

0

Field of Electric Dipole

E

H

r

0

1

2

Near Field Far Field

3

High

Impedance

Field

0

H~1/r2

E~1/r3

The Magnetic Dipole: Phasor Domain

{ }

{ }

{ }

E H E

Ej m

Sinj

r re

H jm

Cosr

j

re

H jm

Sinj

r r

j

re

m I b

r

j r

r

j r

j r

0

4

1

24

1

4

1

0

0

2

0 0

2 2

0

0

0

2

0

2 2

0

3 3

0

0

0

2

0 0

2 2

0

3 3

2

0

0

0

I

Z

X

Y

H

Hr

E

r


b

0

0

0

0

0

0

01202

, ,v

f

Far Fields from Magnetic Dipole: retaining only 1/r terms

( )

( )

( )

( )

E far fieldm

rSin e a

H far fieldm

rSin e a

m I b

j r

j r

0 0

0 0

0

2

4

4

0

0

I

Z

X

Y

H

Hr

E

r


b

0

0

0

0

0

0

01202

, ,v

f

Field of Magnetic Dipole

E

H

r

0

1

2

Near Field Far Field

3

Low

Impedance

Field

0

H~1/r3

E~1/r2

What Is The Relationship Between E and H for Far Field

Case?• The ratio of the electric field intensity, E,

to the magnetic field intensity, H, is the

impedance, , of the medium through

which the wave is traveling. For free

space,

= 377 ohms.

What Are Physical Mechanisms of Magnetic

Field Cross-Talk?

Source of

Magnetic

Field

Transmission

Medium

Induced

EMF

Inductive Coupling Between Two Circuits

Bosch, p66

Equivalent Circuit

1z 2z

Source

Loop - 1

Victim

Loop - 212M12M

Mutual Inductance Describes

Induction Phenomena

Lumped Circuit Model of Magnetic Field Induced Cross-

Talk Voltage Divider Cross-Talk voltage generated in series

with victim conductor

Victim equivalent circuit (lumped model)

1R2R1

CT 12

dV L

dt

voltage

divider

Henry W. Ott, Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic

Systems, John Wiley & Sons

Polarity of induced voltage will be such that the direction of the magnetic field associated with the current flow will oppose any change in the direction of the magnetic field that induces the voltage.

What Are Physical Mechanisms of Electric Field Cross-Talk?

Source of

Electric

Field

Transmission

Medium

Induced

Current

Capacitive Coupling Between Two Circuits

Bosch, p66

Lumped Circuit Model of Electric Field Induced Cross-

Talk (Current Divider)

Cross-Talk current generated between victim

conductor and ground

Victim equivalent circuit (lumped model)

1R2R1

12

dC

dt

current

divider

Henry W. Ott, Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic

Systems, John Wiley & Sons

C12 dV1

dt

+

dt

dVC G

M

dt

dIL G

M

Identification of Type of Crosstalk Between Circuits

If current source (capacitive or electric field coupling) is dominant and R1 is decreased, V is reduced.

If voltage source (inductive or magnetic field coupling) is dominant and R1 is decreased, more current flows through R2

and V is increased.

R2R1 V

Prius Three Phase Cable Between Inverter and Motor

DC Power Cable Used in Prius and Ford Escape Hybrid

Positive Voltage to

Power Electronics

Negative Voltage to

Power Electronics

Rear of Prius

Engine Compartment

of Prius

Two Separate Cables, Each Shielded with

External Insulation Over Shields

Shields tied together.

Power Electronics Are Large Source of EMI

• Ripple in on Power Supply Voltage Line

• Radiated Noise from Fast Switching of

High Voltage and High Currents

– Rectifiers

– DC-DC Converters

– Inverters

– Motor Drives

– DC Motors

EMC Paths in Auto Electric Drives

• Power Converters/Inverters: dv/dt and di/dt Sources– Main Source of EMI

– IGBT Switches Must Be Modeled at High Frequency (One source of high frequency noise)

– Time domain modeling requires knowledge of mutual inductances and capacitances and high frequency models of all components up to 30MHz for conducted EMI and 1 GHz for radiated EMI.

• Electric Motor– Need to know impedance at high frequency

– Common mode capacitance path through bearings

• Cable Between Battery and Inverters– Model as transmission line

• Traction Battery– Need to know impedance at high frequency

Guttowski, Weber, Hoene, John & Reichl, EMC Issues in Cars with Electric Drives, IEEE Symposium on EMC, Aug. 2003.

Plane Wave Reflection and Transmission Through Shields

Hi

Eiz

x

uy

Et

Ht

Er

Hr

Electronics Inside Box

yo

Reflection and Transmission at Shield Boundary

jzjz

shield

mt

x

yjyi

x

t

z

air

i

xr

x

i

z

r

z

eeeE

TH

eeETE

ytE

tzH

ytEtyE

)cos(),(

)cos(),(

Shields of Finite Thickness

E E e az

x1 1

H

Ee a

r

r j z

y

0

0

E E e az

x2 2

b

E E e a

i i

j z

x 0

H

Ee a

i

i j z

y

0

0

E E e a

r r

j z

x 0

HE

e ai z

y1

HE

e azy2

2

E E e a

t t

j z

x 0

H

Ee a

t

t j z

y

0

0

z

x

y

0 0 0

0

0

0

j

j

j j j( )

Boundary Conditions

E z E z E z E z

E z b E z b E z b

H z H z H z H z

H z b H z b H z b

E E E E

E e E e

i r

t

i r

t

i r

b

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( )

.

.

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

1

2

1 2

1 2

1 2

1 2

1 2

1 2

b

t

j b

i r

i b r b t j b

E e

E E E E

Ee

Ee

Ee

.

.

0

0

3

4

0 0

1 2

0

Solution of 1., 2., 3., and 4.

Have 4 equations and 5 variables; therefore, may solve for ratio of

incident E field to transmitted E field.

( )

[ (

) ]

,

,

( )

/ /

/ /

E

Ee e e e e

For bE

Ee e

i

t

b j b b j b j b

i

t

b b

0

2

0

0

0

2 2 2

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

41

1

4 4

0

Approximate Solutions for Good Conductor Shield

Several Skin Depths Thick

( )

( )

E

E

E

E

E

E

H

H

H

H

H

H

i

t t

i

i

t t

i

1

0 1

0

0

0

0

2

1 0

0 1 0

0

0

2

2 2 4

2 2 4

Most of E field reflected at front surface whereas H field is not only

transmitted, it doubles at front surface. E field that arrives at back surface

is doubled when it propagates into free space; almost none of the H field

that is not attenuated and makes it to the back surface is reflected back into

the shield. For frequencies above 3MHz for a 20 mil copper shield,

attenuation of the shield dominates the effect of reflection from the front

and rear surface.

Far Field or TEM Wave Shielding Conclusions

• Electric field shields can be “thin”because most of the E field is reflected at the front surface. But must be grounded.

• Magnetic shields must be “thick”so that the field can be attenuated as it propagates through the shield.

Prius Motor Housing/Shield

Staunton, Ayers, Marlino, Chiasson,& Burress, Evaluation of 2004 Toyota Prius Hybrid Electric Drive System, ORNL/TM-2006/423, May, 2006.

Packaging of Power Electronics in

Prius


Prius Inverter/Converter with

Capacitor Module Removed


Empty Inverter/Converter Housing

Showing Cold Plate Surfaces


Inverter Power Module 18 Pack Array


IGBT-Diode Pair


Toyota Camry Hybrid Integrated

Power Module

Camry HEV Inverters with Top Circuit

Board and Side Housing Removed

EMI Observations from Motor Drive Inverters

• For 10kHz<f<150kHz, DM Noise Dominant with

peaks at multiples of 20kHz Switching Frequency.

Predictable by Simulation.

• For 150kHz<f<30MHz, CM Noise Dominant.

Predictable by Simulation up to 10MHz.

– Path of CM noise is through stray capacitance of motor

windings back to source.

– Another CM path is through stray capacitance between

IGBT collector and heat sink.

Zui, Lai, Tang, Hefnew and Chen, Analysis of Conducted EMI Emissions from PWM Inverter Based on Empirical

Models and Comparative Experiments, 1999 IEEE Symposium on EMC.

Effects of Inverter Generated Common Mode

Noise on Motors

• Leakage Currents or Bearing Current Going to

Ground Through Stray Capacitance Between

Stator and Rotor Can Create Skin Currents on

Auto Body. (Very low impedance at high

frequency.)

– Want CM return currents to flow on cable shield so no

external electromagnetic field generated.

• Shortened Insulation Lifetime of Stator Windings.

Noise Spectrum Due to IGBT or MOSFET Switching in Power

Electronics

''

T

A

]

2

'2

'

][

2

)2

(

[2

T

nT

nSin

T

nT

nSin

T

ACn

Mathematics of SincX

f

fSin

f

fSin

T

AC

XelforXX

Xsmallfor

XelforX

XsmallforX

SinXSincX

r

rn

10101010

1010

1010

log20log202

log20log20

arglog201

log20

01log20log20

arg1

1

Frequency Spectrum of an Ideal Trapezoid Signal

Trapezoid signal amplitude = 1, Frequency = 20kHz, Rise time = Fall time = 400ns =

tau, full width at half max of current = 25 microseconds = t0.

F. Costa and D. Magnon, Graphical Analysis of the Spectra of EMI Sources in Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions

on Power Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 6, Nov. 2005.

Firuz Zare, EMC and Modern Power Electronics, Tutorial, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on EMC

Three Phase Inverter



HEPWM and SHRPWM

HEPWM: Harmonic Elimination PWM

Eliminate low ranked harmonics to simplify the remaining harmonics

filtering process. The main drawback is that the first significant

harmonics display high amplitude. A high number of switching actions

is required to shift upward the first significant harmonics rank.

SHRPWM: Switching and Harmonics Reduction PWM

Optimize the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) by reducing the

amplitude of all the harmonics present within the inverter output

voltage spectrum and by reducing the number of switching angles.

Mansouri, Allah, Meghriche , Cherifi,& Hoet, Proceedings of 2007 IEEE VPPC, Sept. 11 & 12, 2007 Arlington, Texas

Comparison of SHRPWM and

HEPWM Phase-to-Phase Inverter

Output Voltage Frequency Spectrum

HEPWM

SHRPWM

THD=50.26%

THD=39.42%

Even-ranked

and multiple of

3 odd-ranked

harmonics are

automatically

eliminated

Low-Ranked Harmonics Eliminated


Dependence of THD on The Number of

Precalculated Switching Angles


Inverter Common Mode Noise


Common-Mode Voltage Generation in a PWM Inverter

N. Hanigovszki, J. Landkildehus, G. Spiazzzi, and F. Blaabjerg, An EMC Evaluation of the Use of Unshielded Motor

Cables in AC Adjustable Speed Drive Applications, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, January, 2005.

3

cbacm

VVVV


Phase Voltages and Common Mode

Voltage in Six Step 3 Phase Inverter


Major Motor Elements


Stator Turn-to-Turn Winding

Capacitance


Relevant Motor Capacitances


Equivalent Circuit of Motor


Electrical Behavior of Ball Bearings


Motor with Capacitive Couplings


High Frequency Electrical Model

of Motor


Response of Motor to Common

Mode Voltage


Estimates of Common Mode

Current


Capacitive Coupling Between Stator

Windings and Stator Is Most

Important Source of Noise


EMI Modeling of Motor


Measurement of Cstray, Ls and Rloss


Unfolding Measurements


Interpretation of Measurements


Alternative Approach to Modeling

Motor

• Use Three-dimensional Maxwell Equation Solver to Determine all Electrical Losses, Capacitances, Inductances, Speed, etc. as Function of Three Phase Drive Voltages and Currents.

• Store Data in Look-Up Table.

• Run Circuit Analysis Code and Use Data From Look-Up Table.

Reduction of Common Mode Inverter Noise

• Passive filters are large, expensive and do not

work well at high frequencies.

• Active common mode canceller circuits can be

effective.

• Use dual bridge inverter topology – adds another

bridge to output circuit.

• Add a fourth phase to inverter to balance the

inverter network and realize active filtering of the

common mode noise.

• Advanced PWM techniques can be implemented

in software.

PWM Techniques

• Sinusoidal PWM (SPWM)

• Selected Harmonic Elimination (HEPWM)

• Minimum Ripple Current

• Space-Vector PWM

• Random PWM

• Hysteresis Band Current Control

• Sinusoidal PWM with Instantaneous Current Control

• Delta Modulation

• Sigma-Delta Modulation

Bimal K. Bose, Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives, Prentice Hall, 2002, p. 211.

Reduction of EMI in Converters

• Passive filters take large space, are expensive and do not solve the problem perfectly.

• Active ripple filters include– Current and voltage active filters

– Feedforward active filter measures ripple and injects its inverse to obtain net cancellation of ripple.

– Feedback active filters suppress ripple via high-gain feedback control.

• PWM switching frequency modulation may be used to spread the noise concentrated at discrete frequencies over a continuous frequency range.

• ZVT soft switching (reduces dv/dt and di/dt) has minimal effect on conducted EMI at low frequency but out performs hard switching by few dB at high frequency.

Shielded or Unshielded Cables for Three Phase Motor Drives? Most AC adjustable speed motor drives for induction

motors are PWM voltage-source inverters.

To achieve high efficiency (up to 98%), high frequency switching IGBTs are used with dv/dt values of 6 kV/microsecond or higher

Asymmetry in output pulses in three leg inverters results in common mode voltage on the three phase lines.

The common mode voltage causes EMC that is avoided by using shielded cables to connect the inverter to the motor.

Can an unshielded cable and common-mode filters give acceptable EMC performance at lower cost than shielded cables?



Price Comparison Between Shielded and Unshielded Cable



Inverter-Motor Connections Without Filter



Inverter-Motor Connections With LC Filter



Output Filter Topology with DC Link Feedback

N. Hanigovszki, J. Landkildehus, G. Spiazzzi, and F. Blaabjerg, An EMC evaluation of the Use of Unshielded Motor


Conclusions

• In an adjustable speed drive application using a PWM voltage source inverter without any filtering at the output of the inverter or cable shielding very high EMI signals were observed.

• A classical LC filter does not significantly reduce the noise.

• An output filter with dc link feedback which works in both common mode and differential mode reduces the conducted EMI to acceptable levels even when long motor cables are used.

• Shielded cables are unnecessary with this filtering method.



Active Filtering of Common Mode

Signals


Active Filter Connection


Current Sensor Design


Long Cable Effects


Voltage Waveforms Due to Long Cables


Effect of Passive LC Filter on

Voltage


Active Filtering Summary


Summary• System designers have dealt with EMI problems

by shielding, grounding and filtering.

• Power switches (IGBTs and MOSFETs) in

Inverters and Converters are major source of EMI

in power electronics.

• Noise is common mode and differential mode.

• Frequency domain models are straight forward;

time domain models require extensive knowledge

of mutual inductances and capacitances.

• The physical phenomena can be modeled with

lumped circuit models unless “long” cables are

between the inverter and motor.

Documents

Tutorial on Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) in Hybrid ...vppc2010.univ-lille1.fr/uploads/PDF/VPPC-10-Pres-tutorial-EMI.pdf · Introduction to EMC Phenomena EMI Generated by Rapid