Upload
bryana-thorn
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TUSDTUSDTUSDTUSD
Exceptional EducationExceptional Education
Internal Summary and Internal Summary and Environmental ScanEnvironmental Scan
HighlightsHighlights
June 13, 2005June 13, 2005
TUSDTUSDTUSDTUSD Exceptional Exceptional Education Education
Data TeamData Team
Jacqueline Denton
Nancy Edwards
Rick Haan
Jaimie Leopold
Karen McMaster
Kathryn Martin
Jane Mullins
Mary Neale
Terri Polan
Gail Steinbach
Cathy Taylor
Exceptional EducationDepartment
• Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Special Education (Ages 3-22)
• Direct Service Claims (DSC) (Medicaid)
Exceptional Education Student Profile
Total number of students in Exceptional Education is 12,472
• GATE: 4,550 • Special Education Ages 3-5: 717• Special Education Ages 6-21: 7205
Data as of 4/05
Distribution of Exceptional Education
Students
GATE 4550
Special Ed (6-22)
7205
Preschool 717
Special Education History
• 1949 TUSD is the first school district in the State to provide special education to students thanks to Laura Ganoung
• 1954 Brown vs The Board of Education: Separate is not Equal
• 1975 – Congress enacts the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA)
Special Education History
• 1990 – The EHC Act was replaced by the Individuals with Disabilities Act
• 1997 – IDEA
• 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act
Recent Restructuring
Factors:
• Budget• Early Retirement Incentives• Transfers• District Restructuring• Improvement Systems• Reduction in Administration• Illness
Exceptional Education Leadership 2003-2004
Executive Director
Exceptional Education Leadership 2002-2003
DirectorNE/SE Region
DirectorSW RegionHR/Biling.
DirectorNW Region
Ombudsperson
DirectorGifted andTalented
Assistant Director
Rosemont Service Center
Assistant Director
Ajo Service Center
Assistant Director
Transition Services
Assistant Director MedicaidPrograms
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Assistant Superintendent Central Services
Exceptional Education Leadership Fall 2003
Director
Assistant Director
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Programs and Activities to be reassigned:
•Ombudsperson
•Transition/Interim Alternative Placements
•Medicaid
•New Staff Orientation
•Service Centers
•Annual Data Collection
•Cost Study
•GATE
•Community Based Instruction
•Alternative Education Psychologist
•TBI Program Facilitator
•Supervision of 350 staff
Executive Director
Exceptional Education Leadership 2004-2005
Director
Assistant Director
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
Program Specialist
InterimProgram Specialist
Program Specialist(On Leave)
Program Specialist
Interim Executive Director
CoordinatorAssessment/
Technology/Cost Study
CoordinatorMedicaid
CoordinatorProfessional Dev.
CoordinatorDirect Link
(Homebound/Tele)
CoordinatorService Centers/
Accountability/Data
Assistant Director: GATE Program
Specialist
InterimDirector
Program Specialist
InterimAssistant Director
Jane MullinsInterim Director of
School Based Services
Interim Program
Specialists
Jacqueline Denton
Beth Kendall
Terri Polan
Exceptional Education
2005
Cathy Taylor
Technology/AssessmentTerri PolanProfessional Development
Cathy Taylor
Technology/AssessmentTerri PolanProfessional Development
Mary NealeLRE/
Compliance/Service Centers
Dan PerinoTransition
Mary NealeLRE/
Compliance/Service Centers
Dan PerinoTransition
Jacqueline DentonSpecial
Projects/Medicaid
Kathryn Martin
Direct Link
Jacqueline DentonSpecial
Projects/Medicaid
Kathryn Martin
Direct Link
Kathy Allen Child Find
Paul OhmProject ABLE
(Preschool SPED)
Kathy Allen Child Find
Paul OhmProject ABLE
(Preschool SPED)
CoordinatorsCoordinators
Karen McMaster
Interim Executive Director
Leila WilliamsInterim Assistant
Director
Deborah AndersAssistant Director of Gifted and Talented
Laurie Dietz
Brenda Hanna
Shirley Siedschlag
Carin Stair
Barbara Horton
Program Specialists
GatePlusItinerant TeachersGATE Programs
PsychologistsOT/PT/
APETeacherCoaches
ItinerantHI/VI
Social Workers
Speech Pathologists
IDEA
• Provides the foundation for how States and School Districts provide special education.
• Allows for a funding mechanism to assist States and School Districts
• Identification, Evaluation, Placement, Procedural Safeguards and Least Restrictive Environment.
Least Restrictive Environment
• IDEA requires students with disabilities be educated in the regular classroom with supports
• School Districts must make available a full continuum of service delivery options
• Students with disabilities must have access to the general education curriculum
Least Restrictive Environment
Mainstreaming:
Selective placement of special education students to participate in the general education classroom for a period of time when the student is ready to participate in general education
Inclusion:
Commitment to educate each child, to the maximum extent appropriate in the school and classroom he or she would otherwise attend if not disabled
Inclusion• Must be supported philosophically and
administratively to be successful.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
• Mandates all students including those with disabilities demonstrate proficiency on state tests
• Allows for a state-developed alternate assessment
• Allows for accommodations as specified by the students Individual Education Plan team
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 & IDEA
• Emphasis on Teacher Quality
• By June 30, 2006 special education teachers must be Highly Qualified in all of the “Core” subjects they teach
• Emergency or Provisional Certificates are no longer allowed
Exceptional Education Enrollment
• TUSD’s special education enrollment has steadily increased which is consistent with nationwide trends
• The nationwide statistics show an increase of 11.9% (1996-2000).
Comparison of TUSD and U.S. Special Education
Enrollment Trends
National EnrollmentTrend
5,400,0005,600,0005,800,0006,000,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003IDEA-National Enrollment
TUSD ExEd Enrollment
60006500700075008000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
TUSD ExEd Enrollment
Special Education Enrollment as of Dec. 1
2004
• Specific Learning Disability 3452• Speech Language Impairments 1495• Mild Mental Retardation 461• Other Health Impaired 454• Emotional Disability 412• Autism 214• Hearing Impairments 177
Special Education K-12
177
214
412
454
461
1495
3452
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Specific Learning Disability
Speech Language Disability
Mild Mental Retardation
Other Health Impaired
Emotional Disability
Autistic
Hearing Impaired
Special Education Enrollment as of Dec. 1
2004• Moderate Mental Retardation 136• Multiple Disabilities 108• Orthopedic Impairment 75• Severe Mental Retardation 60• Emotional Disability/Separate School 58• Visual Impairment 39• Multiple Disabilities/Severe Sensory 30• Traumatic Brain Injury 30
3030
395860
75108
136
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Moderate Mental Retardation
Multiple Disability
Orthopedically Impaired
Severe Mental Retardation
Emotional Disability Profound
Visual Impaired
Multiple DisabilitySevere SensoryImpairment
Traumatic Brain Injury
Special Education K-12
Special Education Enrollment as of Dec. 1
2004• Preschool
– Preschool Moderate Delay 261– Preschool Speech and Language 170– Preschool Severe Delay 147
Special Education Enrollment as of Dec. 1
2004• Preschool Speech Language Additional
– Head Start 55– Wings on Words 20– Private Preschool 25– Parent and Child Education (PACE) and
Child and Parent Sucess (CAPS) 65
Population Trends Population Trends
Pima County has increased in Pima County has increased in population by 10.4%population by 10.4%
Arizona is currently the second fastest Arizona is currently the second fastest growing state. It has increased in size growing state. It has increased in size by 16.8% from 1999-2003by 16.8% from 1999-2003
The City of Tucson has increased in The City of Tucson has increased in population by 8.2% from 1999-2003, population by 8.2% from 1999-2003, which is consistent with the increased which is consistent with the increased enrollment in TUSD exceptional enrollment in TUSD exceptional educationeducation
Income
• Tucson has a reputation as a low wage town
• Within the city limits of Tucson the median household income is low compared to Pima County, Arizona, and the United States
• The gap has been increasing
State of Arizona Educational Ethnicity
2003-2004
Total Enrollment• Anglo 49%• Hispanic 37%• African American 5%• Native American 8% • Asian American 1%
Special Ed Enrollment• Anglo 49%• Hispanic 35%• African American 6%• Native American 8%• Asian American 1%
Total Enrollment• 35% Anglo• 51% Hispanic• 7% African American• 4% Native American• 3% Asian American
TUSD Demographics*
Special Education• 37% Anglo• 47% Hispanic• 8% African
American• 5% Native American• 2% Asian American
* Random sample from TUSD STATS page - enrollment on 12/1/04
TUSD Demographics
GATE• 43% Anglo• 44% Hispanic• 5% African American• 3% Native American• 5% Asian American
* Gate Data as of 4/05
Exceptional Education Enrollment
• The enrollment of TUSD exceptional education students has increased 8.6% in the last 6 years while the total TUSD enrollment has gone down by 2.5%.
Enrollment Comparison
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05
Total Enrollment in 1000's (10% of Actual)
ExEd Enrollment Actual
Charter Schools
• There are 52 charter schools within TUSD boundaries.
• There are 16 under enrolled schools; all are close to charter schools
• It is estimated that 8,309 attend those 52 charter schools*
• If these students attended TUSD schools, it could increase our revenue by more than $41,545,000*
*This data needs further analysis.
Charter Schools and Under-Enrolled Schools
Exceptional Education Portion of
TUSD Maintenance and Operation
Budget 2003- 04
TUSD 321
Million
Exceptional
Education
41 Million
TUSDExcep Ed
13 %
Exceptional Education Students
• Exceptional Education Students (GATE and Special Education) comprise 20% of the total TUSD Enrollment
TUSD Student Enrollment
Students Receiving
Ex.Ed. Services
20%
Full Funding
• In 1975, when the Education for All Handicapped Children (now IDEA) was first enacted, Congress promised to pay for 40% of the cost of education of students with disabilities.
Full Funding
• Congress has never provided 40%
• State and Local education agencies have had to be responsible for the majority of the costs
Congress’ Contribution for Educating Students
with Disabilities
1995 7.8%
2000 12%
2003 18%
IDEA Funding Coalition March 2003
COST
Cost: 41 million
State/Federal Funds: 12.5 million
28.5 million
Staff• Approximately 20% of the special
education teachers in TUSD have emergency certification
• 38% of TUSD Teaching Assistants have not met NCLB requirements for highly qualified
Medicaid DSCDirect Service Claiming
• TUSD has chosen to participate in order to recover some of the cost for certain medically related services provided to student with an IEP that qualify for Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS)
Medicaid DSCDirect Service Claiming
Participation:
Certified Staff: 425
Classified: 675
Reimbursement: 4.8 Million Total
(2.3 Million was brought in this last year due to increased compliance with claim documentation)
MAC Medicaid Administrative Claiming
Reimbursement: 4.3 Million Total
(1.2 million from just this last year)
NOTE: Federal Guidelines have changed this year so TUSD can only expect annual reimbursement to be between $600,000 – $750,000.
Medicaid Revenue 2003-04 Funds:$2,500,000
Exceptional Education • Teachers and Technology: $300,000
TUSD• Teacher Salaries: $2,000,000• K-3, Project More, Legal, 504, bilingual, fine
arts, interscholastics, ADA requests, workers compenstation, alternative education
Graduation
Students with disabilities lag behind non-disabled students in TUSD graduation rates.
• Regular Education 2004: 80% graduated
• Special Education 2004: 66% graduated
Graduation
Graduation statistics vary for special education due to:
• Some state reports require data for 16-22 year olds and some reports require data relating to just students who exit school that year (12th graders).
• It is important to remember that students with IEP’s can stay until they are 22.
Parent Satisfaction
Satisfied with IEP Progress
79%
7%
14%
Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied
From Annual Parent Survey May 2004 n=100
Parent Satisfaction
Importance of Child Attending His/ Her Home School
93%
2%
5%
Important No Opinion Unimportant
From Annual Parent Survey May 2002 n=531
Working Conditions Survey
• An online survey for Exceptional Education staff was conducted from Dec. 8, 2004 through Jan. 12, 2005
• 199 staff responded– 124 teachers– 75 itinerant staff
Working Conditions Survey
Technology• Computer Assigned
– 19% laptops, 80% desktops, 1% none
• Network Distribution– 26% Administrative, 74% Instructional
• Usage– Hourly 34%, Daily 60%, Weekly 4%, Monthly
1%, Never 1%
Working Conditions Survey
Technology Use
0
50
100
150
200Email
Reports
Internet
Intranet
Instruction
Grading
Attendance
TUSDStats
EE web
Professional webs
Time Spent on IEP Paperwork per Student
< 1 hour8%
1 - 3 hours48%3 - 5 hours
18%
> 5 hours26% < 1 hour
1 - 3 hours
3 - 5 hours
> 5 hours
Working Conditions Survey
AIMS Mastery Results• 95% of special education juniors
were tested in 2003-2004• 5.8% special education juniors
passed all three sections of the AIMS• 3.4% of ELL juniors passed• 47.4% of regular education juniors
passed
TUSDTUSDTUSDTUSD
Exceptional EducationExceptional Education
Internal Summary and Internal Summary and Environmental ScanEnvironmental Scan
June 13, 2005June 13, 2005