turbine hw1

  • Upload
    fhdbd

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    1/10

    Solution to problem 1

    a. Let us first find the available biggest wind turbine. By searching internet, it was found thatcurrently the biggest wind turbine under operation is Emercon E- 126 model[1]. This model has

    a capacity of 7 MWand its rotor diameter is 126 m.

    For calculations of total land area required we will use a 4 by 10 spacing [2], which means the

    spacing between two rows is 10 times rotor diameter and the spacing between two turbines is a

    row is three times the rotor diameter.

    No of turbines required = 830 MW/ 7 MW ~= 120

    So in a single row there will be 60 turbines.

    Row spacing = 10* rotor dia = 10* 126 m ~= 1.25 km

    Total space required for each row ~= 60*(4*rotor dia) = 240*126 m ~= 30.25 km

    Land required = 1.25*30.25 sq km = 37.8 sq km ~= 9,500 acres

    b. In this case the power output from each turbine will be = 0.6*7 MW = 4.2 MWHence number of turbine required will be = 830 MW/4.2 MW = 198

    So in a single row there will be 99 turbines

    Row spacing = 10* rotor dia = 10* 126 m ~= 1.25 km

    Total space required for each row ~= 99*(4*rotor dia) = 396*126 m ~= 49.9 km

    Land required = 1.25*49.9 sq km 62.375 sq km ~= 9,500 acres ~= 15,500 acres

    c. From available data, it is found that the maximum efficiency of commercial solar panels isaround 15% (module: HIP- 200 BA 19/20, manufactured by Saniyo Electric) [3]. Also the

    intensity of solar radiation in Orlando, FL is 0.22 kW/m2

    [4].

    So using this data the land area required for 830 MW of power would be

    = 830 x 10^6/(0.15 x0.22 x 10^3)

    ~= 6250 acres

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    2/10

    References

    [1]. http://www.metaefficient.com/news/new-record-worlds-largest-wind-turbine-7-

    megawatts.html

    [2]. http://www.powernaturally.org/programs/wind/toolkit/13_windpowerproject.pdf

    [3]. http://sroeco.com/solar/most-efficient-solar-panels

    [4]. http://www.solarpanelsplus.com/solar-insolation-levels/

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    3/10

    Solution to problem 2

    2006 energy consumption in United States based on different sources

    2030 projection of energy consumption in United States based on different sources

    Reference:

    http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2008/WEO2008.pdf

    coal

    gas

    oil

    nuclear

    hydro

    bio

    solar

    wind

    coal

    gas

    oil

    nuclear

    hydro

    bio

    solar

    wind

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    4/10

    Solution to problem 3

    Here we do the problem based on the data in problem 2. Hence we need to make some

    assumptions, while some of the conclusions are quite obvious from problem 2. For example, as

    we know the fuel coal cannot be used in any kind of reciprocating engines. Hence all the

    portions of this fuel must go to the turbomachinery part, for example steam turbine where theboiler produces superheated steam by burning coal. For oil and gas part we assume that they

    are equally used both in turbomachinery and in other engines. Hence the obtained pie-charts

    are presented below.

    2006 energy consumption in United States based on different conversion mechanism

    turbine

    genset

    photovoltaic

    electromechanical

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    5/10

    2030 projection of energy consumption in US based on different conversion mechanism

    turbine

    genset

    photovoltaic

    electromechanical

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    6/10

    Solution to problem 4

    From references [1-7] the average wind speed along I-10 is taken as 10.0 mph. Given the

    average wind speed and the space of the median in the high ways, a good model as found by

    searching on internet is Southeast Air companys Air X Model [8]. This models rotor diameter is

    1.15 m. The performance curve for the model as found in [9] is shown below.

    So for 10 mph average wind speed the monthly output from one turbine is nearly 20 kWh.

    Hence the annual output would be around 240 kWh.

    Now the total no of turbines along I-10 with a spacing of 8 rotor dia would be

    = total length of I- 10/ spacing

    = 3959 x 10^3/(8 x 1.15)

    = 430326.087

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    7/10

    So the total annual output from all the turbines = 430326 x 240 kW-hr

    ~= 103.25 GW-hr

    References

    [1]. http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/wind_maps.asp

    [2]. http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/pdfs/wind_maps/us_windmap.pdf

    [3]. http://sroeco.com/solar/most-efficient-solar-panels

    [4]. http://www.solarpanelsplus.com/solar-insolation-levels/

    [5]. http://www.weatherimages.org/data/imag123.html

    [6]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_10

    [7]. http://www.sercc.com/climateinfo/historical/avgwind.html

    [8]. http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/small_wind_turbines_small_wind_generators_gallery.htm

    [9]. http://www.windenergy.com/documents/spec_sheets/0083_rev_c_air-x_single.pdf

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    8/10

    Solution to problem 5

    As stated in the solution of problem-1, from available data, it is found that the maximum

    efficiency of commercial solar panels is around 15% (module: HIP- 200 BA 19/20, manufactured

    by Saniyo Electric) [1]. Also the intensity of solar radiation in Orlando, FL is 0.22 kW/m2[2].

    Now,

    The energy from 1 m2 area per year = ( 0.15 x 0.22 ) KW x (365 x 24) hrs

    = 289 KWh

    Now,

    50,000 sq ft = 50,000 x (12/39.37) x (12/39.37) sq meter = 4645.171 sq m

    Therefore the total energy output from an area of 5000 sq ft per year would be

    = 289 x 4645.171 KW hr

    = 1342454.419 KW hr

    References

    [1]. http://sroeco.com/solar/most-efficient-solar-panels

    [2]. http://www.solarpanelsplus.com/solar-insolation-levels/

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    9/10

    Solution to problem 6

    The curve is plotted for different values of the shape parameter while the two other parameters are

    fixed.

    Now, the curve is plotted for different values of the scale parameter while the two other parameters are

    fixed.

    0

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0 100 200 300 400

    beta = 0.75

    beta = 1.5

    beta = 2

    beta = 0.5

    0

    0.002

    0.004

    0.006

    0.008

    0.01

    0.012

    0.014

    0.016

    0.018

    0.02

    0 100 200 300 400

    eta = 100

    eta = 90

    eta = 75

    t

    (t)

    t

    (t)

  • 8/7/2019 turbine hw1

    10/10

    Finally, the curve is plotted for different values of the time parameter while the two other parameters

    are fixed.

    -0.002

    0

    0.002

    0.004

    0.006

    0.008

    0.01

    0.012

    0.014

    0.016

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

    t0 = 10

    t0 = 20

    t0 = 40

    t

    (t)