Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
7:00 PM. – Regular Meeting
Council Committee Room 4
th Floor, City Hall
Members: Peter Dymond (Co-Chair)
Paul Willoughby (Co-Chair) Michael Avis
Chris Bejnar Harry Blackburn Jeff Chalmers
Steve Collie Herman Custodio
Kathryn Fowlston Palvinder Gill Doug McLeod
Mary Pettingill Anthony Simone
Lynda Voegtle David Whyte Ken Wilde
City Councillor Doug Whillans – Wards 2 and 6
For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for
persons attending (some advance notice may be required), please contact:
Terri Brenton, Legislative Coordinator
Telephone (905) 874-2106, TTY (905) 874-2130, [email protected]
Note: Some meeting information may also be available in alternate formats, upon request
Agenda
Brampton Heritage Board Committee of the Council of
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
Agenda Brampton Heritage Board
2017 07 18 Page 2 of 4
Please ensure all cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs) and other electronic
devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting.
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act
3. Previous Minutes
3.1. Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board – June 20, 2017
Note: The recommendations outlined in the minutes were approved by
Council on July 5, 2017. The minutes are provided for the Board's information.
4. Consent
* The following item(s) listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Committee and will be approved at
one time. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Committee Member requests it, in which case the item will not be
consented to and will be considered in the normal sequence of the agenda.
(12.1)
5. Delegations/Presentations
6. Sub-Committees
7. Designation Program
7.1. Proposed Designations
See attached list.
8. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA)
Agenda Brampton Heritage Board
2017 07 18 Page 3 of 4
9. Correspondence
10. Other/New Business
10.1. Report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated July 6, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – 8280 Heritage Road – Ward 6 (File HE.x).
Recommendation
10.2. Report from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated July 5, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – 10416 Airport Road – Ward 10 (File HE.x).
Recommendation
10.3. Report from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated July 10, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for 1-9 Wellington Street East – Ward 3 (File HE.x).
Recommendation
10.4. Verbal Update from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, re: Awards of Merit
11. Referred/Deferred Items
12. Information Items
12.1. CHO News – Summer 2017
13. Question Period
14. Public Question Period
15 Minute Limit (regarding any decision made at this meeting)
Agenda Brampton Heritage Board
2017 07 18 Page 4 of 4
15. Closed Session
16. Adjournment
Next Meeting: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 – 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Members Present: Peter Dymond (Co-Chair) Paul Willoughby (Co-Chair) Michael Avis Chris Bejnar Harry Blackburn Jeff Chalmers Steve Collie Mary Pettingill Lynda Voegtle Ken Wilde City Councillor Doug Whillans – Wards 2 and 6
Members Absent: Herman Custodio (regrets) Kathryn Fowlston (regrets) Palvinder Gill Doug McLeod (regrets) Anthony Simone (regrets) David Whyte (regrets)
Staff Present: Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services
Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services
Terri Brenton, Legislative Coordinator, City Clerk’s Office
Minutes
Brampton Heritage Board Committee of the Council of
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
3.1-1
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 2 of 9
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. and adjourned at 8:17 p.m.
1. Approval of Agenda
The following motion was considered.
HB050-2017 That the agenda for the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017 be approved as printed and circulated.
Carried
2. Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act – nil
3. Previous Minutes
3.1. Minutes – Brampton Heritage Board – May 16, 2017
The minutes were considered by Planning and Development Committee on May 29, 2017, and the recommendations were approved by Council on June 7, 2017. The minutes were provided for the Board’s information.
4. Consent – nil
5. Delegations/Presentations – nil
6. Sub-Committees
6.1. Minutes – Heritage Resources Sub-Committee – May 11, 2017
The following motion was considered.
HB051-2017 That the Minutes of the Heritage Resources Sub-Committee Meeting of May 11, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, be received.
Carried
3.1-2
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 3 of 9
7. Designation Program
7.1. Proposed Designations
A list of properties proposed for heritage designation was included with the agenda for this meeting. No updates were provided with respect to the properties on the list.
8. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) – nil
9. Correspondence – nil
10. Other/New Business
10.1. Report from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for 164-166 Main Street North – Ward 1 (File He.x).
Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, provided an overview of the subject report.
In response to questions from the Board, Ayodeji Olu-Ayeni, property owner, and staff provided details on the following:
date of building
salvaging of materials
City’s Façade and Building Improvement programs
Board consideration of this matter included:
recognition of the owner’s efforts toward conservation of the property
proposed amendment to Recommendation 2. c. in the staff report to read: “That the owner salvage materials from the rear addition, if appropriate, and in consultation with heritage staff”
The following motion was considered.
HB052-2017 1. That the report from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for 164-166 Main Street North – Ward 1 (File He.x) be received; and
3.1-3
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 4 of 9
2. That the Heritage Permit application for 164 & 166 Main Street North for conservation and restoration work be approved, subject to the following conditions:
a. That the final gutter and eavestrough material be determined to the satisfaction of City of Brampton Heritage staff;
b. That photo documentation of the rear additions be submitted for archival purposes to the City of Brampton and the archives at Peel Art Gallery, Museum & Archives (PAMA); and
c. That the owner salvage materials from the rear addition, if appropriate, and in consultation with heritage staff;
3. That in the event that Council has no scheduled meeting before the expiration of the 90 days of receipt (September 12, 2017) the power to consent to the Heritage Permit for 164 & 166 Main Street North be delegated to the Commissioner, Planning and Development Services as per By-Law 278-2014.
Carried
10.2. Report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, re: Heritage Conservation Plan and Heritage Building Protection Plan, 11690 Chinguacousy Road – Ward 6 (File He.x).
Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, provided an overview of the subject report.
In response to questions from the Board, Mitch Taleski, Paradise Homes, David Eckler, Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd., and staff provided details on the proposed tree preservation plan, and financial securities.
The Board acknowledged the efforts of the developer toward the conservation of this property.
The following motion was considered.
HB053-2017 1. That the report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re:
3.1-4
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 5 of 9
Heritage Conservation Plan and Heritage Building Protection Plan, 11690 Chinguacousy Road – Ward 6 (File He.x), be received;
2. That the “Heritage Conservation Plan” and “Heritage Building Protection Plan” attached as Appendix A to this report be received and approved;
3. That for the storage of a second car, Option A, a single-car carport attached to the west elevation of the addition, is preferred;
4. That as a condition of Draft Plan approval, the applicant shall submit the cost estimate for the works outlined in the Heritage Conservation Plan. This cost estimate will be used to determine the financial securities to be taken prior to registration, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Commissioner, Planning and Development Services;
5. That the owner follow the measures outlined in the Heritage Building Protection Plan and the City’s Minimum Maintenance By-Law;
6. That prior to the completion of the development, the owner undertake all work in accordance with the Heritage Conservation Plan for 11690 Chinguacousy Road, in compliance with all applicable law having jurisdiction and by retaining all necessary permits;
7. That prior to the release of financial securities, the owner provide a letter of substantial completion, prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant, confirming that the required conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Heritage Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services.
Carried
10.3. Report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, re: Information Report: 45 Main Street South Re-Roofing Project – 45 Main Street South – Ward 4 (File HE.x).
3.1-5
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 6 of 9
Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, provided an overview of the subject report.
Ms. Jasinski responded to questions from the Board with respect to the proposed materials for the subject re-roofing project.
Board consideration of this matter included suggested materials to protect the roof system and ensure longevity.
The following motion was considered.
HB054-2017 That the report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, dated June 8, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Information Report: 45 Main Street South Re-Roofing Project – 45 Main Street South – Ward 4 (File HE.x), be received.
Carried
10.4. Verbal Update from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, and Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, re: Main Street South Heritage Conservation District Workshop.
In their verbal update, Cassandra Jasinki, Heritage Planner, and Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, provided details on attendance, feedback from attendees, and next steps toward approval of the Main Street South Heritage Conservation District.
Ms. Jasinski and Mr. Costa acknowledged and thanked those Board Members in attendance for their assistance.
Board Members provided their comments on the workshop, noting the overall positive response from residents.
The following motion was considered.
HB55-2017 That the verbal update from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, and Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Main Street South Heritage Conservation District Workshop, be received.
Carried
3.1-6
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 7 of 9
10.5. Verbal Update from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, re: Walking Tour Map.
Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, notified the Board of a change in information on the display boards in the downtown area. He advised that the maps, which included some of the properties on the Downtown Heritage Walking Tour, have been replaced with information regarding economic development and events.
Mr. Costa indicated that the displays will be changed every two months and that heritage staff will work with Economic Development and Culture to have some heritage themed information included on the display boards.
The following motion was considered.
HB056-2017 That the verbal update from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Walking Tour Map, be received.
Carried
10.6. Verbal Update from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, re: Wall Mounted Plaque Program.
In his verbal update, Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, provided details on the program deadline, applications received, and the Plaque and Awards ceremony taking place on Sunday, October 15, 2017 at Alderlea.
Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, reminded Board Members to submit their choices for the Awards of Merit.
Michael Avis, Chair, Outreach and Marketing Sub-Committee, encouraged Board Members to attend the Ceremony on October 15th.
The following motion was considered.
HB057-2017 That the verbal update from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Wall Mounted Plaque Program, be received.
Carried
3.1-7
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 8 of 9
11. Referred/Deferred Items
11.1. Report from Peter Dymond and Paul Willoughby, Co-Chairs, re: Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation – 82-86 Main Street North – Heritage Theatre – Ward 1.
Peter Dymond, Co-Chair, provided an update from Al Meneses, Commissioner of Community Services, which included:
Colliers International has been retained
the Heritage Theatre Block will be marketed to the general public and specific experienced developers by the end of June 2017
mid-September is the timeline for expressions of interest/offers to be submitted, with submissions to be evaluated after that time
the Board will be kept apprised and updated regularly
The Board considered timelines for its recommendation to Council on designation of the property.
The following motion was considered.
HB058-2017 That the report from Peter Dymond and Paul Willoughby, Co-Chairs, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of June 20, 2017, re: Heritage Report: Reasons for Heritage Designation – 82-86 Main Street North – Heritage Theatre – Ward 1, be deferred to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of September 19, 2017.
Carried
12. Information Items
Michael Avis, Chair, Outreach and Marketing Sub-Committee, along with other Board Members, provided information on the Board’s participation at the City’s CeleBrampton event on June 10,2017.
13. Question Period
In response to a question from the Board, staff indicated that a presentation on the Riverwalk will be provided at a future Board Meeting.
14. Public Question Period – nil
15. Closed Session – nil
3.1-8
Minutes Brampton Heritage Board
2017 06 20 Page 9 of 9
16. Adjournment
The following motion was considered
HB059-2017 That the Brampton Heritage Board do now adjourn to meet again on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair.
Carried
________________________________________________________Co-Chair – Peter Dymond Co-Chair – Paul Willoughby
3.1-9
Proposed Heritage Designations
Downtown Heritage Conservation Districts
All Heritage Cemeteries in the City of Brampton
3864 Countryside Drive – Pendergast Log House – Ward 10
86 Main Street North – Heritage Theatre – Ward 1
7715 Kennedy Road South – Graham-Rutledge Property – Ward 3 (cultural heritage landscape designation)
70 Main Street North – Robson Block – Ward 1
23 Centre Street South – Kilpatrick-Young House – Ward 3
4585 Mayfield Road – Peter Archdekin Farmhouse – Ward 9
1985 Bovaird Drive West – McCandless Plank House –Ward 6
19 John Street – formerly St. Mary’s Church – Ward 3
12061 Hurontario Street (former Snelgrove Baptist Church) – Ward 2
11285 Creditview Road – Drinkwater Farmhouse – Ward 6
3448 Castlemore Road (Squire Thomas Burrell Grist Mill Site/Burrell’s Hollow) – Ward 10
Cole Farmhouse – Ward 10
11223 Torbram Road – Hewson Farm – Ward 10
2472 Bovaird Drive West – Ward 6
2838 Bovaird Drive West (Laird House) – Ward 6
23 Elliott Street – Ward 3
7.1
Report Brampton Heritage Board
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
2017-07-18
Date: 2017-07-06
Subject: Heritage Permit Application – 8280 Heritage Road – Ward 6 (HE.x 8280 Heritage Road)
Contact: Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and Development
Services, 905-874-2618, [email protected]
Recommendations:
1. That the report from Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner, Planning and
Development Services, dated June 29, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board Meeting of July 18, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – 8280 Heritage Road – Ward 6 (HE.x 8280 Heritage Road), be received;
2. That the Heritage Permit application for 8280 Heritage Road for the restoration of
windows and doors, restoration of wood window shutters, and repair of the southwest wall be approved.
Overview:
The property at 8280 Heritage Road is designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a
designated property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written
consent from the Council of the municipality in the form of a Heritage
Permit.
The City has received a Heritage Permit for 8280 Heritage Road for the
restoration of windows and doors, restoration of wood window shutters, and repair of the southwest wall.
This report recommends the approval of the Heritage Permit application subject to the conditions herein.
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and protecting heritage environments with balanced, responsible planning.
Background:
The property at 8280 Heritage Road is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage
Act and contains a well-preserved example of an octagonal dwelling. The property was
10.1-1
designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of cultural heritage value or interest pursuant to By-law 26-1979.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a designated property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written consent from the Council of
the municipality in the form of a Heritage Permit.
Current Situation:
The owners retained Sedgwick Marshall Heritage Homes to undertake work on the
octagonal dwelling at 8280 Heritage Road in accordance with the Minimum Maintenance (Property Standards) By-law 154-2012 (with amendment for Cultural Heritage Resources). On June 27, 2017, Sedgwick Marshall Heritage Homes, on behalf of the
owners of 8280 Heritage Road submitted a Heritage Permit for:
restoration of windows and doors;
restoration of wood window shutters;
repair of the southwest wall.
In accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, Council must respond to the application by
September 25, 2017.
The existing doors, some of which have been broken or damaged, will be restored and reglazed with vintage blown glass. Non-original windows, with the exception of those in the lantern, will be replaced with wood windows to replicate the original windows of the
house. The extant wood windows will be retained where possible and replaced in kind where necessary. All window and door conservation work will be undertaken by Ken
Bare, of Bare’s Woodshed, and the heritage consultants of Sedgwick Marshall Heritage Homes.
There appears to be a difference in the style of the windows on the northwest and southwest façades. As a result, the windows on the south (wall 3) and the north (wall 7)
will have off-set mullions, while windows on the southwest (wall 2) and northwest (wall 8) will be restored with 4-over-4 sash windows (Figure 1; see Appendix A).
10.1-2
Figure 1: Layout of octagonal house with numbered walls.
The southwest façade of the building requires extensive repairs due to improperly
completed remedial work in the past. Much of the existing brick of the southwest façade (wall 2) will be removed and replaced in kind using lime-based mortar and Ontario size brick from Vintage Brick. Brick which can be salvaged from wall 2 will be incorporated
into the repair of the house where possible. All masonry work will be completed by a mason with over 40 years of experience working on heritage buildings.
Heritage staff have reviewed the proposed works and met with the consultants to agree on a plan for the restoration of the windows and doors. The proposed replacement brick
is of a high quality and will be stained to match if the exact colour of the Octagon house cannot be found. It is recommended that the Heritage Permit application be approved.
Corporate Implications:
Financial Implications:
10.1-3
None.
Other Implications:
Strategic Plan:
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and protecting heritage
environments with balanced, responsible planning.
Conclusion:
Heritage staff have reviewed the Heritage Permit application. The proposed works will
significantly enhance the cultural heritage resource and contribute to the long-term conservation of its heritage attributes. It is recommended that the Heritage Permit for the
restoration of windows and doors, restoration of wood window shutters, and repair of the southwest wall be approved
Original Approved by: Original Approved by:
Pam Cooper, MCIP, RPP Interim Manager, Land Use Policy
David Waters, MCIP, RPP, PLE Interim Director, Policy Planning
Attachments:
Appendix A – Heritage Permit Application: 8280 Heritage Road
Report authored by: Cassandra Jasinski, Heritage Planner
10.1-4
PART TWO - HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION:
HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
In accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act a heritage permit must be issued by City Council for allproposals to erect, remove or alter the exterior of buildings, structures or other features described asheritage attributes within the scope of a heritage designation by-law .
City staf f and the Brampton Heritage Board review all applications and then submit them to CityCouncil for approval.
City Council has the authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to approve any heritage applicationeither with or without conditions or to refuse the permit application entirely .
Please provide the following information (type or print)
A. REGISTERED OWNERNAME OF REGISTERED OWNER(S)
TELEPHONE NO. HOME ( ) BUSINESS: FAX: ( )
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
B. AGENT(Note: Full name & address of agent acting on behalf of applicant; e.g. architect, consultant, contractor, etc)
NAME OF AGENT(S)
TELEPHONE NO. HOME ( ) BUSINESS: ( ) FAX: ( )
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
14
Note: Unless otherwise requested, all communications will be sent to the registered owner of the property.
Appendix A 10.1-5
C. LOCATION / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
LOTS(S) / BLOCK(S)
CONCESSION NO. REGISTERED PLAN NO.
PART(S) NO.(S) REFERENCE PLAN NO.
ROLL NUMBER:
PIN (PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.)
D. OVERALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION / SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
15
10.1-6
E. DESCRIPTION OF WORKS(Please briefly describe the proposed works as they fit within one or more of the categories below; notethe specific features that would be af fected. Use separate sheets as required; attach appropriatesupporting documentation; point form is acceptable):
Rehabilitation and/or Preventative Conservation Measures (e.g. repointing masonry; note whichheritage attributes and features would be impacted and where, materials to be used,specifications and techniques):
Major Alterations, Additions and/or New Construction (note which attributes to be impacted, locationof work, materials to be used, specifications and techniques):
Restoration (i.e. replicating or revealing lost elements and features; note which attributes to beimpacted and where, materials to be used, specifications and techniques):
16
10.1-7
F. SCOPE OF WORK IMPACTING HERITAGE PROPERTY(Check all that apply)
NEW CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED
DEMOLISH AL TER EXPAND RELOCA TE
G. SITE STATISTICS (For addition and construction of new structur es)LOT DIMENSIONS FRONTAGE ________________DEPTH
LOT AREA ________________m2
EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE ________________%
BUILDING HEIGHT EXISTING ________________m
PROPOSED ________________m
BUILDING WIDTH EXISTING
ZONING DESIGNATION
________________m
PROPOSED ________________m
OTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: (Check off only if required)
MINOR VARIANCE (COA) _________________
SITE PLAN APPROVAL _________________
BUILDING PERMIT _________________
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY _________________
SIGN BYLAW APPROVAL
(Note: IF YES, other appr ovals should be scheduled after
___________
____________________________
_________________
the Heritage Permit has been approved byCity Council)
17
10.1-8
10.1-9
10.1-10
10.1-11
10.1-12
10.1-13
10.1-14
Report Brampton Heritage Board
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
2017-07-18
Date: 2017-07-05
Subject: Heritage Permit Application – 10416 Airport Road – Ward 10
(HE.x 10416 Airport Road)
Contact: Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and
Development Services, 905-874-3825, [email protected]
Recommendations:
1. That the report from Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and
Development Services, dated June 29, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage Board
Meeting of July 18, 2017, re: Heritage Permit Application – 10416 Airport
Road – Ward 10 (HE.x 10416 Airport Road), be received;
2. That the Heritage Permit application for 10416 Airport Road for repointing and
selective replacement of bricks and masonry steam cleaning be approved,
subject to the following conditions:
a. That the applicant select a masonry contractor experienced in historic brick
work to complete the repointing and selective replacement of bricks; and,
b. That the date for the steam cleaning of the masonry be approved by
Heritage staff prior to the commencement of the procedure.
Overview:
The property at 10416 Airport Road is designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a
designated property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written
consent from the Council of the municipality in the form of a Heritage
Permit.
The City has received a Heritage Permit for 10416 Airport Road for the
10.2-1
repointing and selective replacement of bricks and masonry steam
cleaning.
This report recommends the approval of the Heritage Permit application
subject to the conditions that: the applicant select a masonry contractor
experienced in historic brick work to complete the repointing and selective
replacement of bricks; and that the date for the steam cleaning of the
masonry be approved by Heritage staff prior to the commencement of the
procedure.
In the event that Council has no scheduled meeting before the expiration of
the 90 days of receipt (September 12, 2017) the power to consent to the
Heritage Permit for 10416 Airport Road is delegated to the Director, Policy
Planning as per By-Law 278-2014.
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and
protecting heritage environments with balanced, responsible planning.
Background:
The property at 10416 Airport Road is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage
Act and contains a one-and-a-half storey Gothic Revival brick residence. The property
was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of cultural
heritage value or interest pursuant to By-law 57-2012.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a designated
property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written consent from the Council of
the municipality in the form of a Heritage Permit.
Current Situation:
On June 14, 2017, the owner of 10416 Airport Road submitted a Heritage Permit for
repointing and selective replacement of bricks and steam cleaning of the masonry.
The proposed brick repointing will be completed on all façades using lime based mortar
to blend with the existing mortar. Cracked and/or broken bricks will be replaced in kind
with custom-made bricks to match the existing brick. A masonry company will be chosen
at a later date, that is experienced in historic masonry work.
The proposal also includes steam cleaning the masonry to improve the appearance of
the building by removing unattractive dirt or soiling materials. Low pressure water
cleaning methods are generally the gentlest means possible, and they can generally be
10.2-2
used to safely remove dirt from all types of historic masonry. However, any cleaning
method involving water should never be done in cold weather or if there is any likelihood
of frost or freezing because water within the masonry can freeze, causing spalling and
cracking. Therefore, it is recommended that the proposed date for the steam cleaning be
approved by Heritage staff prior to the commencement of the cleaning.
The steam water cleaning at 10416 Airport Road will be undertaken by Brickwash, which
is a qualified heritage restoration contractor. It is recommended that the Heritage Permit
be approved subject to the following conditions: that the applicant select a masonry
company specialized in historic brick work to complete the repointing and selective
replacement of brick; and, that the date for the steam cleaning of the masonry be
approved by Heritage staff prior to the commencement of the procedure.
Corporate Implications:
Financial Implications:
None.
Other Implications:
None.
Strategic Plan:
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and protecting heritage
environments with balanced, responsible planning.
Conclusion:
Heritage staff have reviewed the Heritage Permit application. The proposed works will
significantly enhance the cultural heritage resource and contribute to it’s long-term
conservation. It is recommended that the Heritage Permit application for conservation
and restoration work at 10416 Airport Road be approved subject to the following
conditions:
That the applicant select a masonry contractor experienced in historic brick work
to complete the repointing and selective replacement of bricks; and
That the date for the steam cleaning of the masonry be approved by Heritage
staff prior to the commencement of the procedure.
10.2-3
Original Approved by: Original Approved by:
Pam Cooper, MCIP, RPP
Interim Manager, Land Use Policy
David Waters, MCIP, RPP, PLE
Interim Director, Policy Planning
Attachments:
Appendix A – Heritage Permit Application: 10416 Airport Road
Report authored by: Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner
10.2-4
PART TWO - HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION:
HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
In accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act a heritage permit must be issued by City Council for allproposals to erect, remove or alter the exterior of buildings, structures or other features described asheritage attributes within the scope of a heritage designation by-law .
City staf f and the Brampton Heritage Board review all applications and then submit them to CityCouncil for approval.
City Council has the authority under the Ontario Heritage Act to approve any heritage applicationeither with or without conditions or to refuse the permit application entirely .
Please provide the following information (type or print)
A. REGISTERED OWNERNAME OF REGISTERED OWNER(S)
TELEPHONE NO. HOME ( ) BUSINESS: ( ) FAX: ( )
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
B. AGENT(Note: Full name & address of agent acting on behalf of applicant; e.g. architect, consultant, contractor, etc)
NAME OF AGENT(S)
TELEPHONE NO. HOME ( ) BUSINESS: ( ) FAX: ( )
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
14
Note: Unless otherwise requested, all communications will be sent to the registered owner of the property.
10.2-5
C. LOCATION / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
LOTS(S) / BLOCK(S)
CONCESSION NO. REGISTERED PLAN NO.
PART(S) NO.(S) REFERENCE PLAN NO.
ROLL NUMBER:
PIN (PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO.)
D. OVERALL PROJECT DESCRIPTION / SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
15
10.2-6
E. DESCRIPTION OF WORKS(Please briefly describe the proposed works as they fit within one or more of the categories below; notethe specific features that would be af fected. Use separate sheets as required; attach appropriatesupporting documentation; point form is acceptable):
Rehabilitation and/or Preventative Conservation Measures (e.g. repointing masonry; note whichheritage attributes and features would be impacted and where, materials to be used,specifications and techniques):
Major Alterations, Additions and/or New Construction (note which attributes to be impacted, locationof work, materials to be used, specifications and techniques):
Restoration (i.e. replicating or revealing lost elements and features; note which attributes to beimpacted and where, materials to be used, specifications and techniques):
16
10.2-7
F. SCOPE OF WORK IMPACTING HERITAGE PROPERTY(Check all that apply)
NEW CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED
DEMOLISH AL TER EXPAND RELOCA TE
G. SITE STATISTICS (For addition and construction of new structur es)LOT DIMENSIONS FRONTAGE ________________DEPTH
LOT AREA ________________m2
EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE ________________%
BUILDING HEIGHT EXISTING ________________m
PROPOSED ________________m
BUILDING WIDTH EXISTING
ZONING DESIGNATION
________________m
PROPOSED ________________m
OTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: (Check off only if required)
MINOR VARIANCE (COA) _________________
SITE PLAN APPROVAL _________________
BUILDING PERMIT _________________
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY _________________
SIGN BYLAW APPROVAL
(Note: IF YES, other appr ovals should be scheduled after
___________
____________________________
_________________
the Heritage Permit has been approved byCity Council)
17
10.2-8
10.2-9
10.2-10
10.2-11
10.2-12
10.2-13
Report Brampton Heritage Board
The Corporation of the City of Brampton
2017-07-18
Date: 2017-07-10
Subject: Heritage Permit Application – Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for 1-9 Wellington Street East – Ward 3 (H.Ex. 1-3 Wellington
Street East– Peel County Courthouse, H.Ex 5 Wellington Street East – Peel County Administrative Building, H.Ex 7 Wellington
Street East – Old Peel Registry Office, H.Ex 9 Wellington Street East – Peel County Jail)
Contact: Tristan Costa, Assistant Heritage Planner, Planning and Development Services, 905-874-3825, [email protected]
Recommendations:
1. That the report from Tristan Costa, dated July 7, 2017, to the Brampton Heritage
Board Meeting of July 18, 2017, Heritage Permit Application – Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act for 1-9 Wellington Street East – Ward 3 (H.Ex. 1-3
Wellington Street East – Peel County Courthouse, H.Ex 5 Wellington Street
East – Peel County Administrative Building, H.Ex 7 Wellington Street East –
Old Peel Registry Office, H.Ex 9 Wellington Street East – Peel County Jail)
be received; and
2. That the Heritage Permit application for installation of a pedestal plaque on the PAMA campus be approved.
Overview:
The properties at 1-9 Wellington Street East are designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a
designated property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written consent
from the Council of the municipality in the form of a Heritage Permit.
All four buildings on the PAMA campus are contributing heritage resources.
A Heritage Permit application for the installation of a pedestal plaque on the
PAMA campus has been submitted to the City.
The plaque will commemorate the four cultural heritage resources on the PAMA
campus: the Peel County Courthouse, Peel County Administrative Building, Old
10.3-1
Peel Registry Office and Peel County Jail. As such, the proposal is being
recommended for approval.
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and protecting heritage features with balanced, responsible planning.
Background:
The properties at 1-9 Wellington Street East are designated under Part IV of the Ontario
Heritage Act and contain the Peel County Courthouse, Peel County Administrative Building, Old Peel Registry Office and Peel County Jail.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, alterations to a designated property likely to affect its heritage attributes require written consent from the Council of
the municipality in the form of a Heritage Permit.
Current Situation:
To celebrate the 150th anniversary of the Peel County Courthouse and Peel County Jail,
the Region of Peel submitted a Heritage Permit application on July 6, 2017 for the installation of a pedestal plaque commemorating the four cultural heritage resources on the Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives (PAMA) campus and their importance to the
history of Peel County. In accordance with the OHA, Council must respond to the application by October 4, 2017.
Heritage staff met Regional Archivist, Jim Leonard, and Supervisor of Operations at PAMA, Simonette Seon-Milette, on April 24th, 2017. At the meeting, Heritage staff were
consulted about the design, content, location and cost of the plaque. Region of Peel and City of Brampton staff agreed that the plaque will follow City of Brampton standards. The
Region of Peel will develop wording and select images for the plaque and City staff will assist with the design layout. The Region of Peel and City of Brampton will share the cost of the plaque and its installation. As the PAMA campus is subject to a heritage
conservation easement agreement with the Ontario Heritage Trust, the Trust’s approval will also be required prior to the plaque being installed.
The Region of Peel staff have attached an evaluation of two locations for the pedestal plaque as part of the Heritage Permit Application: the front lawn of the Courthouse near
the corner of Main Street South and Wellington Street East or the front lawn of the 1890 Registry office location. As a result of their evaluation, which considered accessibility
and visibility, the Region of Peel selected the front lawn of the 1890 Registry office as the preferred plaque location. Heritage staff agree with this location for the plaque.
Two of the buildings on the PAMA campus were constructed in 1867 and are celebrating their 150th year. The installation of a pedestal plaque on the PAMA campus will
commemorate the history of landmark cultural heritage resources in the City of
10.3-2
Brampton and the history of Peel. It is recommended that the Heritage Permit application be approved.
Corporate Implications:
Financial Implications:
The Region of Peel and City of Brampton will develop a cost-sharing agreement outlining the costs each entity will incur. There are funds available in the Heritage Walk
budget for this plaque.
Other Implications:
None.
Strategic Plan:
This report achieves the Strategic Plan priorities by preserving and protecting heritage
environments with balanced, responsible planning.
Conclusion:
The Heritage Permit application for the 1-9 Wellington Street East, including the Peel
County Courthouse, Peel County Administrative Building, Old Peel Registry Office and Peel County Jail, for the installation of a pedestal plaque on the PAMA campus is being recommended for approval.
Original Approved by: Original Approved by:
Pam Cooper, MCIP, RPP Manager (Interim), Land Use Policy
David Waters, MCIP, RPP, PLE Director (Interim), Policy Planning
Attachments:
Appendix A – Heritage Permit Application: 1-9 Wellington Street East (Peel County
Courthouse, Peel County Administrative Building, Old Peel Registry Office and Peel County Jail)
10.3-3
10.3-4
10.3-5
10.3-6
10.3-7
10.3-8
10.3-9
10.3-10
10.3-11
10.3-12
10.3-13
10.3-14
10.3-15
MESSAGE: 50 MM HT.WHITE REFLECTIVE VINYLFONT: ITC GARAMOND LIGHTCONDENSED.
L820
aN
X-1
b IN
TER
PR
ETI
VE
SIG
NS
MA
LL A
NG
LE M
OU
NT
-P
OS
T &
PA
NE
LN
.T.S
SE
PTE
MB
ER
201
4S
ITE
AM
EN
ITIE
S -
SE
RIE
S 8
00
FINAL TEXT, FONTS AND SIZES FORWHITE HEADER MESSAGES TO BECONFIRMED PRIOR TOMANUFACTURE
POST & BASE:PAINTED BLACK
25
25
NOTES:
1. ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS SPECIFIC TO EACH LOCATIONWHERE SIGNAGE IS TO BE ERECTED. FOOTINGS ANDFOUNDATIONS ILLUSTRATED ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY.
2. THIS DETAIL IS TO BE READ IN COLOUR. PDF COPIES AREAVAILABLE FROM PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES,PARKS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF BRAMPTON.
3. ARTWORK IS AVAILABLE FROM STRATEGICCOMMUNICATIONS, OFFICE OF THE COO, CITY OF BRAMPTON.
4. FOR ALL SIGNS SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS ARE REQUIREDPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. DRAWINGS MUST SHOW: MESSAGINGDIRECTIONS AND LAYOUT, SIGN LOCATION AND CONTEXTREFERENCE, AND FOOTING / FOUNDATION ENGINEERINGCERTIFICATION.
5. MAROON COLOUR SCHEMES TO BE USED IN DOWNTOWNAREA ONLY, BLUE COLOUR SCHEME TO BE USED CITY WIDE.
6. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESSSTATED OTHERWISE.
FINISHES:
75
PAINT MATTHEWS:BLACK METALLIC:
BLUE METALLIC:
YELLOW SOLID:
PALE BLUE SOLID:
WHITE SOLID:
MAROON METALLIC:
PALE MAROON SOLID:
VINYL:BLUE:(OPAQUE VINYL)LIGHT MAROON:(TRANSLUCENT VINYL)LIGHT BLUE:(TRANSLUCENT VINYL)BLUE:(TRANSLUCENT VINYL)YELLOW:(TRANSLUCENT VINYL)GREEN:(TRANSLUCENT VINYL)WHITE:(REFLECTIVE VINYL)BLUE:(REFLECTIVE VINYL)MAROON:(REFLECTIVE VINYL)YELLOW:(REFLECTIVE VINYL)
ACRYLIC:WHITE:
MP19962 SATIN FINISH
MP22028 SATIN FINISH
MP07681 SATIN FINISH
MP07490 SATIN FINISH
WHITE SATIN FINISH
MP22297 SATIN FINISH
MP00984 SATIN FINISH
AVERY ROYAL DARK BLUE METALLIC A7753-M
3M FROSTED ROSE CRYSTAL
3M FROSTED BLUE MIST CRYSTAL
AVERY TWILIGHT BLUE A9591-T
3M SCOTCHCAL MARIGOLD
AVERY ARMY GREEN A9676-T
3M SCOTCHLITE ENGINEER GRADE WHITE
3M SCOTCHLITE ENGINEER GRADE BLUE
AVERY BURGUNDY A7819-R
3M SCOTCHLITE ENGINEER GRADE YELLOW
MILK-WHITE ACRYLIC
1 of
2
10.3-16
L820
bN
X-1
b IN
TER
PR
ETI
VE
SIG
NS
MA
LL A
NG
LE M
OU
NT
-P
OS
T &
PA
NE
LN
.T.S
SE
PTE
MB
ER
201
4S
ITE
AM
EN
ITIE
S -
SE
RIE
S 8
00
762
1263
45.0°695
A
400
102 MM DIA. 6 MM THK.ALUM. POST, WITH 45° CUTON TOP WELDED THROUGHPLATE AT BOTTOM & TOP
13 MM DIA. X 914 MM LONGJ-BOLT C/W 13 MM DIA.ST/STL ACORN NUTS (USE'LOCTITE' 263 HIGHSTRENGTH [RED] THREADLOCKER)
13 MM THK. FOLIA PANEL
6 MM THK. ALUM. SUPPORTPLATE WELDED TO POST
8 - 6 MM DIA.TAMPER-PROOF SCREWS
SIDE ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION
14440
0695
557
113
138
102
500
980
38
38
FOLIA PANEL DETAIL22
9
108
305
229 MM DIA. X 13 MM ALUM. BASEPLATE WITH 4 - 19 MM DIA. HOLES
102 MM DIA. 6 MM THK. WALL ALUM.POST WITH 45° CUT ON TOP, WELDEDTHROUGH PLATE AT BOTTOM & TOP
13 MM DIA. X 914 MM LONG J-BOLT C/W13 MM DIA. ST/STL ACORN NUTS (USE'LOCTITE' 263 HIGH STRENGTH [RED]THREAD LOCKER)
NOTES:
1. ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONSSPECIFIC TO EACH LOCATION WHERE SIGNAGE IS TO BE ERECTED. FOOTINGS ANDFOUNDATIONS ILLUSTRATED ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY.
2. FOR ALL SIGNS SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.DRAWINGS MUST SHOW: MESSAGING DIRECTIONS AND LAYOUT, SIGN LOCATION ANDCONTEXT REFERENCE, AND FOOTING / FOUNDATION ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION.
3. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
SECTION A
2 of
2
10.3-17
10.3-18
10.3-19
10.3-20
10.3-21
10.3-22
10.3-23
Heritage-Patrimoine Cornwall is celebrating Canada'sSesquicentennial by recognizing heritage property own-
ers who have shown a commitment to lovingly preserving andmaintaining the heritage and historical value of their homes orcommunity institutions. The Committee chose four owners in2017 to receive this prestigious Award of Commitment. Certifi-cates of Recognition were also awarded to companies and indi-viduals in Cornwall who have given of their skills and resourcesto help with the restoration of these properties. The CommitmentAwards (fine glass trophies) and the Certificates of Recognitionwere presented at the Mayor's picnic, a Canada 150 event held inLamoureux Park on Victoria Day.
The first Award of Commitment was presented to UpperCanada District School Board for the construction of CentralPublic School in 2006. The architectural firm of Colbourne andKembel from Kingston designed the new school, incorporatingthe designated facade of the 1931 addition into the design. It is afeature wall in the library and can be seen from the street. Demo-lition and construction started in 2005 with the tender awarded toBourgon Construction of Cornwall. It was an engineering feat toanchor the brick and stone facade in place while the new con-struction was built around it.
Historically, the school began in 1817 on the same site asCornwall Public School. In 1850, a two storey brick schoolhousewas built with two rooms on each floor and employed four
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 1
2017
Quarterly Publication o Community Heritage Ontario / Patrimoine communautaire de l'Ontario
Echo the Past and Preserve for the FutureHeritage-Patrimoine Cornwall
f Quarterly Publication of Community Heritage Ontario / Patrimoine communautaire de l'Ontario
2017
Sydney Street House
IN THIS ISSUE
Echo the Past and Preserve for the 1 CHO Service Awards 2017 8 Upcoming Workshops 12Future
The Ontario Heritage Act Register 3 If This Tree Could Talk... 9 CHOnews Deadlines 12
is Online President’s Message 10Copyright Notice 12
End of the Road for the Prettiest 4 Disclaimer 12Street in Ontario CHO/PCO Board of Directors 11
CHO/PCO Mission Statement 5 News from the CHO/PCO Board 11
We Want to Hear From You 5 of Directors
Ontario Heritage Conference 2017 6 Advertise in CHOnews 11The McCannells. A Scottish 7Immigration Story CHO/PCO Board Meetings 11
www.communityheritageontario.ca
Summer / Été12.1-1
teachers. In 1883-84, a large brick structure was built withtwelve classrooms to accommodate an ever increasing studentpopulation. Additions constructed in 1921 and 1931 at the frontof the property blended beautifully with the rest of the building.In 1950, the school was renamed Central Public School. In 1962,the school was renovated and included a gymnasium, twelveclassrooms, a library, and home economics and industrial artsrooms. The 1884 and 1921 sections were demolished, leaving the1931 addition.
The second Award was presented to the Board of the Boys andGirls Club who bought and refurbished the historic Church of theGood Shepherd, an Anglican parish, in 2008. The church isbelieved to be Gothic Revival with other styles apparent. It has anattached wooden parish hall, which was the original church built bythe Reverend Cannon J.J. Mountain in 1886. The Church of theGood Shepherd had its last service on July 4, 2004, after 118 years.The church was the spiritual foundation for generations of families.
The refurbishment committee for the church was formed andhad members from the Boys and Girls Club Board, the architectsresponsible for the design (Rick Taylor, Architect 49), the con-tractor (Menard Bros. & Associates), and Heritage Cornwall. Thecommittee remained cognizant of the heritage value of the proper-ty when discussion led to the placement of the washrooms. Thefirst design presented had the washrooms in the church sanctuary,which would have compromised the heritage integrity of thespace. The architects rectified the design and were able to place aunisex washroom in the reception area in the link between the halland the church sanctuary. The original wooden church hall sport-ed a brand new kitchen. Ramps for accessibility were placedinconspicuously, blending in with the design, and actuallyenhancing the overall aesthetic of the space.
Cornwall's first inn (circa 1814) has been brought back to lifeand its original purpose thanks to Robert Prowse who worked torehabilitate it into a Bed and Breakfast. The Chesley family wasprominent in Cornwall during the nineteenth century, producingshopkeepers, innkeepers, and even a mayor of Cornwall. Thestructure is a wonderful example of Georgian architecture. Thefront facade has the characteristic Georgian rectangular shape,with a symmetrical five bay facade. The two and one half storeybuilding with its projecting rear wing would have made a very
Chesleys’ Inn
large residence for the time. The medium pitched roof and dualend wall chimneys are common in the Georgian style. The win-dows are long and narrow and occupy considerable wall space.Overall, the composition of the house relates a sense of simpleGeorgian elegance and solidity.
We were pleased to present the third Award of Commitment toRobert Prowse, owner and innkeeper of Chesley's Inn. He hadhelp from Eric MacDonald at Tartan Home Comfort who workedto bring the archaic heating system up to code. Glen Porter atPorter's Historical Restoration works passionately to restore andmaintain heritage buildings that need loving attention to brick,stone, and wood. He has done some work on all of our awardwinners' properties.
Another Award of Commitment was presented to James andTimo Edney-Lepage for their beautiful renovation of a historichome on Sydney Street, one of the oldest streets in Cornwall.Heritage-Patrimoine Cornwall has done research and taken photosof many of the homes on Sydney Street because this is one of theareas we would like to pursue for a District Designation. Many ofthe property owners on the street have done renovations, but havepreserved the heritage architecture and appeal of their homes.
In 1896, a Pitt Street businessman named Gordon Phillips pur-chased property on the adjacent street in Cornwall for the sum of$700. Mr. Phillips had his beautiful home at 229 Sydney Streetconstructed that same year by Ross Construction Company. Mr.Phillips owned a business that dealt with home furnishings, withnewspaper advertisements boasting that he "sold the best lines ofstoves and is known for varieties of kitchen and cooking utensils."
Central Public
2 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
12.1-2
He also was a tinsmith and did plumbing work on the side, havinginstalled many furnaces in churches, public buildings, and privatehomes in Cornwall.
Today the Phillips House is one of Sydney Street's most glam-orous homes, possessing nearly all of its original features. Thehouse has since been painted an eye-catching shade of blue, giv-ing it one more reason to stand out on the street. I wonder if Mr.Phillips ever imagined that his home would win a heritage award121 years after he had it built!
"Places that echo the past and are preserved for the future"expresses the sentiment that heritage homes can be lovingly pre-served to be sustainable and last well into the future to be enjoyedfor generations to come.
This article was coauthored by Heritage-PatrimoineCornwall members Debbie Ledoux, Marjorie Vallee, andSara Lauzon.
If you were at the recent OntarioHeritage Conference in Ottawa you
may have heard me speak about the onlineor eRegister that is now available on theOntario Heritage Trust's website. TheeRegister is a work in progress and wewill be adding properties and documentsdaily, so please check back frequently.Here are a few reasons why municipalheritage committee members shouldcheck out the online Register:
The OHA Register is a comprehen-sive record of municipal designationbylaws. The Register tracks municipaldesignation bylaws from 228 municipali-
ties across the province, from the first des-ignation (Sandyford Place, Hamilton,August 26, 1975) to the most recentbylaws passed by municipal councils.
It can help assess your municipali-ty's designation program. When was thelast designation bylaw passed? What hasyour community protected over the pastforty years? Where there are gaps? Per-haps there are a lot of houses designated,but industrial buildings, cemeteries orparks have not been protected. The onlineRegister can help you identify trends andhelp with long term planning initiatives.
You can learn more about the
Sandyford Place in Hamilton is the first property designated under the Ontario Heritage Act.It is also protected with an Ontario Heritage Trust conservation easement and is a National
Historic Site of Canada.
required documentation. Using theonline Register will help you becomefamiliar with the range of OHA docu-ments that should be submitted to theTrust. Over thirty different types of docu-ments are provided to the Trust frommunicipalities.
It can provide insight into designa-tions in other municipalities. You cancompare the number of designations inyour community with other similar sizedcommunities. Friendly heritage rivalry canbe a good thing!
It can help you analyze provincialtrends in designations. The Register pro-vides information on more than fortyyears of designations. The new onlineRegister will be searchable by municipali-ty, property type, construction year, etc.You can examine patterns and trendsacross the province, such as the impact offunding on designation. Fun fact: Thepeak period of designations was 1983 to1985, which coincided with a number ofprovincial heritage incentive programs.
You can identify missing bylaws andother documentation. Examining theonline Register can help to identify miss-ing bylaws and information. You can fillin gaps in the Register by working withyour Clerk's office or planning staff toensure routine compliance. It is importantto make sure the Register is up-to-datesince it provides an administrative backupof key heritage documents.
It allows you to discover andexplore. There are so many unique andinteresting designations to learn about,like the Wayne Gretzky family home inBrantford, the Roseneath Carousel in
The Ontario Heritage Act Register is OnlineErin Semande
Boys and Girls Club Old Church Hall
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 3
12.1-3
Alnwick/Haldimand, a swimming pool inKitchener's Woodside Park, and a segmentof a 1913 brick roadway in Welland.
It is a unique heritage conservationtool. The Register is the only central bankof information of its kind in Ontario. TheRegister holds thousands of documentswith considerable research potential.Together, these documents provide infor-mation and insight about heritage conser-vation across the province and in individ-ual municipalities and can tell us a greatdeal about what a community values.
Have questions about the Ontario Her-itage Act Register? You can direct them tothe Provincial Heritage Registrar: ErinSemande 416-212-1704 or [email protected]
Erin Semande is the ProvincialHeritage Registrar at the Ontario Her-itage Trust.
In Whitby, Len Cullen is best knownas the visionary behind Cullen Gar-
dens, a beautiful combination of nature,walking trails, a miniature village, fun andgames. In our home during the 1990s,Christmas was not Christmas without avisit to see Santa Claus at Cullen Gardensand a walk through the winter wonderland.
Len Cullen was also very much com-mitted to heritage conservation. He savedWhitby's Lynde House from destructionand literally put it on display as the show-piece at Cullen Gardens. Creating ThePrettiest Street in Ontario was also a visionof Len Cullen. His plan, over time, wouldhave given new life to twenty five heritagehomes that would otherwise be lost. Thepopular term for this is "adaptive re-use;"the repurposing of built heritage structures.
As a business person, Len Cullen sawnot only the virtue in saving old buildingsfrom the wrecking ball, he saw the poten-tial for revenue. The Prettiest Street inOntario would save heritage propertiesand it would be a money maker, too. Theplan was for the street level of each hometo be repurposed as boutique retail spacewhile the upper floors would be bed andbreakfast accommodations. The first fivehomes were acquired and moved toCullen owned property on the northwestcorner of Taunton Road and CochraneStreet, adjacent to Cullen Gardens,between 1990 and 2001.
It was a noble plan but ultimately onethat was never realized. The plan to move
forward with a total of twenty five homesstalled and the five homes have sat vacantever since. Cullen Gardens ceased opera-tions in January 2006. The Town of Whit-by purchased the Cullen Gardens propertyand established Cullen Park.
In August 2016, the property on whichthe homes stand was sold to developerCedar City TFP Whitby DevelopmentsIncorporated. The company has submitteda residential housing Subdivision Applica-tion to the Town of Whitby. Now, the fivehomes that were to be the start of the pret-tiest street are available for relocation orsalvaging and may face demolition.
Time has not been a friend to thehomes. Unfortunately, the condition ofthe homes has greatly deteriorated overtime due to exposure to the elements andvandalism. According to a 2016 BuiltHeritage Evaluation of the properties,only three were in fair condition with twoin poor condition. The land on which thehomes sit has been sold for redevelop-ment and all five must be removed ordemolished.
The story of the Prettiest Street inOntario has a final chapter that is not all
bad news. There is now an opportunity forenterprising people to acquire the homeseither for relocation or, failing that, to sal-vage and repurpose architectural elementsof the buildings. The homes in fair condi-tion are potential candidates for reloca-tion. The future of those in poor conditionis likely strictly the salvaging of architec-tural elements. Cedar City has indicatedan interest in hearing from prospectivebuyers as well as salvaging queries. If noviable opportunities emerge, the build-ings, which are not on the Whitby Her-itage Register, will be demolished (subjectto municipal permits).
Inquiries can be directed to BethHalpenny, Project Manager, on behalf ofthe developer at 416.274.8327. There isno access without permission as thehomes are on private property and sur-rounded by security fencing.
John Ecker is Chair of Whitby Her-itage. Some information was extractedfrom the November 2016 Cultural Her-itage Impact Assessment by GoldsmithBorgal & Company Ltd., Architects.
Sandyford Place, North Elevation
End of the Road for the Prettiest Street in OntarioJohn Ecker
4 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
12.1-4
Hastings House: A Snapshot
This 1870 residence is in the Gothic Revival
style with Victorian and Romanesque attributes. It
was relocated from the intersection of Finch Avenue
and Markham Road. Much of the home's interior and
exterior is original. The gables and dormers have
elaborate wood detailing on the bargeboards. The
architect is unknown. The home has been unoccupied
and unheated since its relocation to Whitby. The ground floor win-
dows are covered in boards and the upper level windows are broken
and exposed to the elements. Ground floor interior features include an
ornate plaster ceiling medallion and wood wainscoting and panelling.
Overall, the plaster is in good condition.
CHO/PCO MissionStatement
To encourage the development of municipally
appointed heritage advisory committees and to further
the identification, preservation, interpretation, and wise
use of community heritage locally, provincially, and
nationally.
We Want to Hear From You
CHOnews is YOUR quarterly publication. We want
to know about the initiatives, achievements, challenges,
and concerns of your Municipal Heritage Committee.
Information networking through CHOnews is important.
Submissions are welcome at any time.
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 5
12.1-5
Museum of Nature Welcome
Algonquin College Trades Demonstration
Aboriginal Entertainment at Lunch
Centre for Global Pluralism
6 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
12.1-6
The following is based on an arti-cle written about 1920 by Captain
James McCannell, master of the S.S.Assiniboia, flagship of the CanadianPacific Great Lakes fleet.
Few people travelling today on luxuri-ously appointed cruise ships would haveany idea what conditions were like on theimmigrant ships crossing the Atlantic inthe early 19th century bringing the pio-neers who settled in this country. Some ofthose ancient hulks were not at all fit tocarry passengers: sanitary arrangements,ventilation, and conveniences were oftenfar from what they should have been.
After discharging bulk cargoes atBritish ports, sailing ships were often char-tered to carry passengers back to NorthAmerica. Carpenters were sent on boardand temporary berths were built along theship's sides between decks for the accom-modation of passengers. After landing themon this side of the Atlantic, the berths wereagain removed to make room for the returncargo. Many steamers crossing the Atlanticin the middle of the 19th century wereengaged in the freight and passenger ser-vice; most passengers came by sailing ship.
There were no deluxe rooms, noobservation rooms, and no smokingrooms. A deluxe room could well meanjust a curtained off berth. In many casesthese ships were overcrowded and insome cases went out undermanned as the
owner or sea captain knew full well thatthe passengers would include men accus-tomed to seafaring. In order to break themonotony on board ship, they would bewilling to help make or take in sail or anyother seaman's work.
One of the greatest hardships for pas-sengers at that time was the supply offresh water, which in many cases wentbad or the passengers were put on shortallowance. But even with many inconve-niences, there were times when the voy-age was most pleasant and those on boardhad a good time.
Economic conditions in Scotland werenot favourable and owing to unemploy-ment many were forced to emigrate. In1852, Archibald McCannell and Rachel(nee MacArthur) along with their two chil-dren immigrated to Ontario from Jura, anisland in the Inner Hebrides off the westcoast of Scotland. The only credentialsthey were armed with was their churchmembership certificates dated Jura, May27, 1852, saying that they were leaving theparish without spot or stain on their charac-ter. Their passage was booked on the threemasted bark, Ann Harley of Glasgow.
If the present generation could onlyrealize what the pioneers of old Ontariowent through while travelling and tryingto establish homes in the unbroken forestof this fair land, there is not one with aspark of pride within, but would feelproud to be descendants of such fathersand mothers, men and women. They hadthe courage and determination to set outon a voyage of weeks followed by thehardships of clearing land, often farremoved from the centres where theymight obtain the necessities of life.
At last, the vessel arrived at Quebec,August 15, 1852. All passed through themedical inspection, not being detained onaccount of illness, transferred to passengersteamers which were to take them toToronto. Down between decks were manypassengers, many of them river driverswho had taken rafts to Quebec. FinallyToronto was reached and seemed to be thelast separating place as many families leftthere for Hamilton and Canada West aswestern Ontario was then called. The oth-ers took stages from Toronto for HollandLanding, where they boarded the littlesteamer Beaver for Barrie.
The saga continues based on the familyrecords and reminiscences of James
S.S. A ssiniboia in Port McNicholl, 1920 Photo: Huronia Museum
McCannell (Jr.)At Barrie, the McCannell family were
met by Donald McGillivray, who tookthem to his home on the 10th line neartheir holding. Most of the journey fromBarrie was made on foot, with the twoyoung children in tow. After a trek of ninemiles, they reached Willow Landing,where they could board a batteau to crossthe Minesing Swamp and make their waydown the Nottawasaga River to GeorgianBay. (Many new settlers bound for thenorthern United States also took thisroute). Their long journey ended at theirhundred acre holding below Blue Moun-tain near Collingwood, in an area populat-ed by their fellow Scots and sheep farm-ers. Here they raised a family of sevenGaelic speakers, three of whom becameship captains on the Great Lakes.Archibald died in 1902, Rachel in 1915.
One of their sons, James McCannell(Sr.), was renowned on both sides of theborder as a skilled sailor and ship master.James began his career in 1888 on hisbrother's ship out of Collingwood boundfor Chicago. In 1907 he piloted the S.S.Assiniboia and S.S. Keewatin from Buffa-lo to Owen Sound, then the home port ofthe Canadian Pacific Great Lakes Service.In 1908 he moved his family there andjoined CP as First Officer on the S.S.Alberta. When the five ship CP fleet wastransferred to Port McNicoll in 1912,James and his family followed and he builthis home there in 1913 - 1914. He cap-tained the S.S. Assiniboia, flagship of thefleet, from 1913 to his retirement in 1936.
Perhaps the most dramatic event dur-ing the Assiniboia's many voyages wasthe storm of 1913. Over 300 sailors losttheir lives in the storm, but CaptainMcCannell sailed successfully to PortMcNicoll, braving the hurricane winds,snow squalls, and rough water of the
The McCannells. A Scottish Immigration StoryTerry Fegarty
Captain James McCannell, Master, S.S. A ssiniboia, 1913-1936
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 7
12.1-7
CHO Service Awards 2017
Community Heritage Ontario Service Awards are awardedannually to people nominated in two categories. The Ser-
vice to CHO Award is given to a person who has shown outstand-ing leadership and contributions to CHO furthering the cause ofOntario's heritage and has provided a minimum of five years ser-vice to CHO. The second award is given to a Municipal HeritageCommittee member who has furthered the cause of heritage intheir community showing leadership and contributions with aminimum of five years service. Written nominations are accepteduntil March of the award year.
The Museum of Nature set the stage for the presentation of theCHO Municipal Heritage Committee Member Service Award atthe Ontario Heritage Conference Gala dinner on June 9, 2017.Debbie Ledoux of Heritage-Patrimoine Cornwall received a cer-tificate and memento for her contributions to Cornwall's MHCfrom CHO president Wayne Morgan. Debbie is a well respectedmember of Cornwall's heritage committee and community. Herachievements in the past fifteen years have strengthened andenhanced heritage in Cornwall and the surrounding area.
Debbie has written many articles on heritage in local publica-tions to educate the community on the heritage and heritage pro-grams in her area, as well as contributing to CHOnews. Debbie isalso a published writer penning "A Journey to Remember" on thehistory of Central Public School in downtown Cornwall. To fur-ther promote this built heritage attribute, she championed theincorporation of the old facade into the current school. For years,Debbie hosted the Doors Open venue at this location to show thesuccess of adaptive reuse.
Debbie continued to champion adaptive reuse when theChurch of the Good Shepherd transitioned to the Cornwall Boysand Girls Club. Debbie researched and compiled information forrecommendations to protect its heritage features and promote theproperty's transformation.
Debbie's strength in research and assessment has been a valu-able asset to Cornwall heritage. She has done research on the pos-
sible Heritage Conservation District designation of Sidney Streetand the OHA designation of East Front School. She also volun-teers at the Cornwall Room in the downtown library. This roomhouses archival materials on Cornwall and area. She is alwaysthinking of ways to educate and promote the heritage of Cornwallas well as being aware of accessibility standards for the disabled.
In 2014, Debbie co-chaired the Ontario Heritage Conferencein Cornwall, which she pursued for a few years to come to Corn-wall. She was also diligent in obtaining the "Quilt of Belonging"which was showcased at the Gala dinner at the conference.
CHO congratulates Debbie Ledoux again on all of her accom-plishments and her continued support of CHO and heritage in Ontario.
CHO encourages our membership to nominate a member of aMHC and/or a past CHO Board member or volunteer for our Annu-al Service Awards. Please resubmit nominations that may have beenunsuccessful recipients this year. Their contributions were alsoinspiring in the promotion of heritage. Nomination information canbe found on the CHO website communityheritageontario.ca. Ques-tions can be directed to [email protected]
raging storm. Captain McCannell died in1939. The Assiniboia serviced the PortMcNicoll to Lakehead run for more than
fifty years. She was retired in 1966 andscrapped in 1970.
The house at 556 Algoma Avenue in
Port McNicoll was lived in by March1913. The McCannell family had no run-ning water until a dug well was added tothe property in 1914. The house has beenwell maintained all of its life and the orig-inal aspects and partitions of the homehave been kept. The only real modifica-tion to the house came in 1933 when theveranda and porch at the front of the homewere rebuilt and enlarged. The windowshave been replaced with storm windows,but the trim is original.
In 1916 James McCannell, Jr., wasborn in the family home. He himself haslived a storied life and in 2017 still residesin the house of his birth. In 2007, theMcCannell home was recognized by theTownship of Tay for its historical signifi-cance.
Terry Fegarty is Chair of the TayHeritage Committee.
The McCannell home in Township of Tay James McCannell is a retired geologist andengineer.
Debbie Ledoux and Wayne Morgan
8 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
12.1-8
If This Tree Could Talk...
In the Annex neighbourhood of downtown Toronto therestands a Silver Maple. It's known to the community as “The
Big Tree,” and it has borne witness to the City of Toronto grow-ing around it, from scratch. When The Big Tree was first plantedin 1863, it was surrounded by rural farmland. The Huron StreetSchool was built adjacent to it in the 1890s and, since then, gener-ations of families have spent their time in the shade of its leaves.The Big Tree is a meeting place, a hiding spot during games, acomfortable seat amongst its roots, and an impossible obstacle toclimb (though everybody tries). It provides shade, leaves for mak-ing leaf forts and piles to jump in, and it imparts one with a senseof history by its very presence.
The story of this tree is just one of many that needs to beshared, but it takes a community to bring them forward. Throughthe Heritage Tree Program, we are able to recognize the value andhistory of trees like The Big Tree across the province. Ontario'strees and forests are part of our history and culture. Beyond con-serving energy, cleaning the air we breathe and water we drink,and adding character to our neighbourhoods and public spaces,trees are also living monuments to our rich history. Many of our
oldest and largest trees, or even groups of trees, are closely linkedto significant figures and events from our past.
"Each Heritage Tree we recognize helps to illuminateOntario's rich history," says Rob Keen, CEO of Forests Ontario."Trees connect us and we value the richness they bring to ourcommunities, regardless of our differences. Each tree has aunique back-story, highlighting a piece of history we are able toshare through the Heritage Tree Program."
The Heritage Tree Program celebrates the historic, cultural,and social legacy of trees, bringing their stories to audiencesprovince-wide. In 2017, Forests Ontario is celebrating Canada'ssesquicentennial with the 150 Heritage Tree Challenge. With sup-port from TD Bank Group, we hope to reach our goal of 150 rec-ognized trees across Ontario communities and celebrate one ofour country's most enduring symbols.
Anyone can nominate a tree for Heritage Tree designation,whether it is on their own property, their neighbour's, a familymember's, or in a public space. Heritage Trees should be associat-ed with a historic person or event, or be growing on land that ishistorically significant. Candidate Heritage Trees are also
assessed for form, shape,beauty, age, colour, size, rari-ty, genetic constitution orother distinctive featuresand/or as a prominent commu-nity landmark; however, itshistorical or cultural signifi-cance is of most importance.
All recognized HeritageTrees are added to an interac-tive map (found at www.tree-bee.ca) which charts HeritageTress across the province andprovides users with imagesand the story of each tree.
The Heritage Tree Programprovides another way to con-sider the value of trees,beyond their environmentaland social importance. In cre-ating greater awareness of his-torical value, the HeritageTree program encouragesOntarians to value and carefor our urban forests.
Get InvolvedIf you'd like to help us tell thestory of Ontario's urbanforests, contact us at 1-877-646-1193 or visit www.her-itagetree.ca.
Jessica Kaknevicius isDirector of Forest Educa-tion and Awareness forForests Ontario.
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 9
12.1-9
President's MessageWayne Morgan
The Ontario Heritage Conference inOttawa was a great event to learn,
be inspired, develop contacts, and attend theCHO/PCO annual general meeting. (If youmissed it, plan to attend next year's confer-ence in Sault Ste. Marie, June 7 to 9, 2018.)Two events occurred at the 2017 Confer-ence that I want to bring to your attention.
Bill C-323The Honourable Peter Van Loan spoke
about his private member's Bill C-323, anact to amend the Income Tax Act to pro-vide for the rehabilitation of historic prop-erty. Paul King wrote about it in the spring2017 issue of CHOnews. The Bill can beviewed at parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/C-323/first-reading. It has passed2nd reading and is before the StandingCommittee on Environment for review inthe fall of 2017 before going to third read-ing. It only made it this far because it hassome support from all parties. There is noguarantee that it will make it through thirdreading unless there is all party support. Iurge you to CONTACT YOUR MEMBEROF PARLIAMENT EXPRESSING SUP-PORT FOR BILL C-323. Your voice willmake a difference. This Bill is a great ini-
tiative, one that we need. I will write onbehalf of CHO/PCO to express our sup-port for the Bill.
Infill in a Heritage Area or Adjacentto a Heritage Building
When some conference participantswere on a walking tour of the ByWardMarket, an Ottawa heritage conservationdistrict, at one stop they had an intensediscussion about a recent infill project bythe National Capital Commission at thenortheast corner of Sussex Drive andClarence Street. The community eventual-ly supported the development. The pho-tographs I have included show the projectin context - between two heritage build-ings. It is nearing completion, with somehoarding still up.
This is an issue your municipal her-itage committee will face whether theinfill is in a heritage conservation districtor adjacent to a heritage building. Somethings to consider about an infill proposalrelative to adjacent heritage buildings areheight, setback, massing, materials, roofshape, window and door openings, andfloor levels. A previous building on thesite may provide some guidance.
The architectural style of this develop-ment was debated by participants. Shouldit replicate a historical style from the area;can it be a modern style that fits in; orshould it be somewhere between thosetwo positions? If a historical style is used,does it create confusion about what is her-itage and what is new? Lastly, does thenew building overwhelm or detract fromthe heritage building? Given that, is thisan appropriate infill development?
NCC development includingsketch of the finished develop-ment (centre), Sussex Drive and
Clarence Street, Ottawa. Photos: Wayne Morgan
10 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
12.1-10
CHO/PCO Board of Directors 2017-2018
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
President
Wayne Morgan Sutton West 905.722.5398
waynemorgan@
communityheritageontario.ca
Vice-Presidents
Tracy GaydaToledo 613.275.2117
Ginette GuyCornwall 613.363.5312
Chair of Finance
Paul R. KingSt. Marys 416.274.4686
paulking@
communityheritageontario.ca
DIRECTORS
Bob MartindaleAjax 905.683.8703
bobmartindale@
communityheritageontario.ca
Matthew GregorScarborough
647.204.7719
matthewgregor@
communityheritageontario.ca
Michael Rikley-LancasterAlmonte
613.256.3754
michaelrikley@
communityheritageontario.ca
Dennis WarrilowBarrie
705.797.1410
denniswarrilow@
communityheritageontario.ca
CORPORATE SECRETARY/TREASURER
Rick SchofieldScarborough
416.282.2710
schofield@
communityheritageontario.ca
Advertise inCHOnews!
Reach a province-wide readershipcomposed of all Municipal HeritageCommittee members, heritage societies,municipal officials, and heritage con-scious individuals!
DISPLAY ADS must be suppliedin camera-ready tiff or pdf format.Location of ads is at the discretion ofthe Editor. Cost is per issue:
Full Page $300Half Page $150Third Page $100Quarter Page $75One Sixth 5”x 2.6” $50Business Card $25
CLASSIFIED ADS: $12.00 per columninch
To place an ad in CHOnews, pleasecontact Rick Schofield at
News from the CHO/PCO Board of Directors
Your CHO/PCO Board of Directorsmet in Scarborough on June 25,
2017, to conduct the usual business of thecorporation.
The Board agreed to apply to the Min-istry of Tourism, Culture and Sport for theannual Provincial Heritage OrganizationGrant and gratefully acknowledges thefinancial support provided by the Ministry.
The Executive Committee memberswere elected with Wayne Morgan remain-ing as President and Tracy Gayda electedVice President to join Ginette Guy whohas one year remaining in her term.
The President reported on a successfulworkshop dealing with Researching Her-itage Properties held recently in Caledoniawhich includes Haldimand Township, Nia-gara Falls, and New Tecumseh. He alsoreminded members that we must begin tolook to the future of heritage preservationwith churches and schools closing heritagebuildings, and banks abandoning their her-itage structures as they move to more elec-tronic banking activities. The recent demo-lition of the 110 year old Bank of Montrealin Toronto is one such example.
The Corporate Secretary/Treasurerdistributed various documents to membersto be added to the Board members' policybinders, including a revised set of bylawsapproved by the membership at its 2017
AGM in Ottawa. The Conference Committee outlined
the successful 2017 Conference and indi-cated that plans are well underway for nextyear's conference to be held at Sault Ste.Marie in June. The Board also approvedthe application of Goderich to hold the2019 conference pending discussions withthe Joint Conference Committee.
Through our new Program Officer, theEducation Committee has booked work-shops at Saugeen Shores dealing withResearching Heritage Properties. Anotherworkshop at Gananoque has been bookedand will explore how heritage fits withplanning. MHCs who wish to hold a CHOworkshop are asked to contact our Educa-tion Committee Chair, Bob Martindale,who is listed on the CHO/PCO Board ofDirectors elsewhere in the issue.
CHO/PCO BoardMeetings
CHO/PCO Board of Directors'meetings are open to any MHCmember. Please contact the Corpo-rate Secretary to confirm each datebefore attending. Scheduled meet-ings will be held at 6282 KingstonRoad, Scarborough.
Summer / Été 2017 CHOnews 11
12.1-11
CHOnewsis published quarterly by
Community Heritage Ontario.
Additional copies of CHOnews areavailable from Rick Schofield at the
corporate mailing address or bycalling 416.282.2710.
Submission DeadlinesMarch 10, June 10, October 10, and
December 10
The financial support of the Ministry ofTourism, Culture and Sport is gratefullyacknowledged.
Corporate AddressCHO, 24 Conlins Road,
Scarborough, ON M1C 1C3www.communityheritageontario.ca
Let’s hear from you! Send yournews and comments to the Editorfor publication in CHOnews.
Articles should be in Word format.Images shou ld be sent as . jpgattachments in high quality resolution(300 dpi). Do not embed the imagesin the text of the article. Captionsand credits need to be provided.
Newspaper articles as updates toMunicipal Heritage Committee activi-ties cannot be used without permis-sion of the newspaper and/or theoriginal author. Text written by theMHC is encouraged.
Articles are published in the languagethey are received.
CHO/PCO is on Facebook.
ISSN 1201 - 9852
12 CHOnews Summer / Été 2017
CHO is pleased to present two unique workshops this fall. If you missed theworkshop that CHO Board President Wayne Morgan offered in Haldimand
County in May, there will be another opportunity to attend the same workshop onSeptember 23, 2017, between 12 pm and 4:30 pm at the Historic Southampton TownHall in Southampton. The workshop is hosted by Saugeen Shores Municipal HeritageCommittee. Wayne Morgan will be discussing and illustrating the various heritageresearch sources, ranging from census records through insurance plans to architectur-al design books. This will give participants a chance to know what information needsto be compiled in order to recommend listing and designating heritage propertiesunder the Ontario Heritage Act.
Later in the fall, CHO Board member and heritage planner Bob Martindale willgive a workshop on How Heritage Fits with Planning. The event will be held onNovember 3, 2017, between 9 am and 2 pm at the Arthur Child Heritage Museum inGananoque. This workshop will address the preparation of municipal heritage regis-ters, designating significant heritage properties, ensuring that heritage concerns areproperly addressed when new development projects are being considered, requiringthe submission and review of heritage impact assessments, and determining how toincorporate heritage buildings into new developments.
All CHO members are invited to attend these workshops but space is limited.For more information or to register, please contact Elena Veldman at [email protected].
Upcoming Workshops
Copyright NoticeContributors to CHOnews permit the further copying of their works only
for the purposes of educating the public on heritage matters. Copyrightremains with the author or creator. Credit must be given to the author or cre-ator and to the source, CHOnews, on all copies made. No work can be reprint-ed in any published form without permission of the copyright holder.
DisclaimerThe content of CHOnews does not contain nor reflect any opinion, position,
or influence of the CHO/PCO Board of Directors or the Editor of CHOnews.Submissions received for publication in CHOnews are changed only for pur-poses of legibility and accuracy to the extent that can be readily determined.
CHOnews DeadlinesCHOnews issues are Spring, Sum-
mer, Fall, and Winter. The deadlines forsubmission are as follows: March 10 (Spring issue) June 10 (Summer issue) October 10 (Fall issue) December 10 (Winter issue)
Submissions are always welcomed.
12.1-1212.1-12
