Upload
ashish-patel
View
72
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Tube light choke test-with normal & electronic choke conducted earlier
Citation preview
TUBE LIGHT CHOKE TEST
1 no. of 40 watt Bajaj Make Flourscent Tube light was tested on normal & electronic choke as per follows:
Normal Choke: Wonder make full polyester flourscent ballast Operating Voltage: 180 – 240 v Watt Consumption: 40 watt
Electronic Choke: 1. Micro make ballast Power Supply: 230 v / 50 Hz
Operating Voltage: 60 – 400 v Watt Consumption: 25 W to 30 W Power Factor: 0.9 2. Opal (Electrostreaks – India) make ES – 40S
Electronic ballast Power Supply: 240 v , 50/60 Hz
Operating Voltage: 100 – 300 v Current: 150 mA Power Factor: > 0.93
WITH NORMAL CHOKE
WITH ELECTRONIC CHOKEMICRO MAKE OPAL MAKE
VOLTAGE CURRENT VOLTAGE CURRENT VOLTAGE CURRENT265 V 0.34 A 265 V 0.13 A 265 V 0.15 A250 V 0.31 A 250 V 0.13 A 250 V 0.14 A240 V 0.28 A 240 V 0.13 A 240 V 0.14 A230 V 0.26 A 230 V 0.12 A 230 V 0.14 A220 V 0.24 A 220 V 0.12 A 220 V 0.13 A210 V 0.21 A 210 V 0.12 A 210 V 0.13 A200 V 0.19 A 200 V 0.12 A 200 V 0.13 A190 V 0.16 A 190 V 0.12 A 190 V 0.13 A180 V 0.13 A 180 V 0.12 A 180 V 0.13 A170 V 0.10 A 170 V 0.12 A 170 V 0.13 A160 V 0.06 A 160 V 0.11 A 160 V 0.13 A
CONCLUSION: So it is observed from above testing that if GEB voltage range is about 265 V anywhere, current consumption of electronic choke is 2.5 times less than the normal choke at same voltage, so electricity bill charges can be reduced as same ratio by installing electronic choke instead of normal choke.
Test Date: 17.02.04