28
TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving Skills Through Active Learning A Component of SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation April 11 – 13, 2006

TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving Skills Through Active Learning TTU Quality Enhancement Plan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving SkillsThrough Active Learning

TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving SkillsThrough Active Learning

A Component of SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation

April 11 – 13, 2006

Elements of a Successful QEP

Broad Campus Involvement

Supported by Research Findings

Effective Methods of Assessment

Supports Vision/ Goals of Institution

Improving Student Learning

Identified Weakness

Issues SACS Will Focus On

Establishing the Focus

Evidence of Broad Campus Involvement in Developing QEP

Capacity to Initiate and Continue

Assessment of Progress

TTUQEP

Development Process

A Three Year Effort

NewVision & Mission

New StrategicPlan

TTU Vision

“TTU will be one of the best universities in the nation through a commitment to the life-long success of our students”

The QEP and Strategic Planning

Organizational Structure for SACS

Leadership TeamLeadership Team

Compliance CommitteeCompliance Committee QEP CommitteeQEP Committee

Steering CommitteeSteering Committee

UniversityUniversity

QEP Committee Composition

Dr. Barry Stein, Chairperson, Director of PlanningDr. Joseph Biernacki, Engineering - ProfessorMisty Cecil, StudentDr. Glenn Cunningham, Engineering - Associate ProfessorTheresa Ennis, StudentDr. Wade Faw, Agriculture - DirectorDr. Ada Haynes, Arts & Sciences - ProfessorDr. Sandi Smith, Education - Assistant ProfessorGail Stearman, Nursing - Assistant ProfessorDr. Thomas Timmerman, Business Administration - Associate Professor

Goals of QEP Committee

Identify Weaknesses in

Student Learning

SuggestTopics & Strategies

Vision

ImprovedLife-longSuccess

Vision

ImprovedLife-longSuccess

TTU QEP Development ProcessTopic Generation

Phase ITopic Refinement

Phase IITopic Selection

Phase IIIAnalysis & Refinement

Phase IV

Campus Units

Enter Strategic Goals/action Plans for

QEP Topics

Ana

lysis of

Ca

mp

us InputIdentify Weaknesses

Identify TopicsIdentify Strategies

QEP Committee Focus Groups

SGAFaculty SenateDeans’ CouncilSteering Committee

Phase I

Identify Weaknesses with Assessment Data

Employer SurveysTeaching Evaluations - Objectives Selected

Teaching Evaluations - Progress Ratings

Enrolled Student Surveys

Alumni Surveys

General Education Test Results

Employer Survey

Progress on IDEA Teaching Objectives

TTU Progress on IDEA Objectives (2001-2004)

38.0

40.0

42.0

44.0

46.0

48.0

50.0

52.0

Objective

Ad

j T

Sco

re

Phase II

Maximizing Involvement in Process

QEP TopicsCritical ThinkingProblem SolvingCreative ThinkingCommunicationTeamwork SkillsLife-long Learning

QEP TopicsCritical ThinkingProblem SolvingCreative ThinkingCommunicationTeamwork SkillsLife-long Learning

Faculty Senate

Deans’ Council

SACS SteeringCommittee

SGA

Focus Groups

Feedback on QEP Topics

Skills Graduates need for Success

# 1 for Faculty = Critical Thinking

# 1 for Students = Real World Problem Solving

# 1 from Employer Survey = Problem Solving

Narrowing the QEP Focus

Maximizing Participation

Improve critical thinking/real world problem solving skills through the use of active learning strategies.

With emphasis on communication skills

With emphasis on teamwork skills

With emphasis on creative thinking

Phase III

Requesting Unit Participation

QEP Website WWW.TNTECH.EDU/QEP

Phase IV: Analysis of Campus Input

What was Learned:

Areas of emphasis broadened participation

Some Units Submitted Good Ideas

Some Units did not

Stimulate More Faculty InvolvementTeaching/learning Enhancement Grants for Faculty/Staff

Adjustments to Process

Replicate TTU’s Best Practices in New AreasIncentives for sharing best practices and mentoring

Additional Evidence of Broad Campus Involvement

Over 100 unit and individual faculty/staff proposals submitted

Proposals from academic and non-academic units

Capacity to Initiate and Continue

$250,000 committed over 5 years to support grants, assessment, and administration of QEP

Expertise in assessment and pedagogy available

Additional funds available through external grants

QEP is a key component of the strategic plan

Planned Assessments

Implementation Indicators

Student evaluation of progress

Student performance indicators

Alumni evaluation of progress

Employer evaluation of graduates

Thank You

www.tntech.edu/QEP