TT 145 Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    1/10

    HW Process Technologies, Inc.

    Engineered Membrane Separation(EMS) Membrane

    Technology Developments for Mining Appl ications

    (TT-145)

    Metallurgical Processes Committee

    Authors

    John. A. Lombardi VP Marketing DevelopmentMining ([email protected])

    Oscar A. Osores Process Engineer ([email protected])

    Company

    HW Process Technologies, Inc.

    1208 Quail Street Lakewood, CO 80215

    United States of America

    Phone 303.234.0273 Lima, Peru: 991663137

    Fax 303.237.9868

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    2/10

    1.0 Summary

    Membrane technology has been available for over 50 years, but has been used

    sparingly in the general mining industry. However, recent developments in polymer

    chemistry, spiral-wound element construction, pretreatment equipment and techniques,

    and an expanded understanding of membrane fouling and cleaning techniques have

    dramatically improved the reliability and robustness of membrane-based systems for use

    in the mining industry.

    Membrane technology for mining applications has gone beyond producing high-quality

    water from well- and sea-water by pushing forward with process water treatments to

    recover and concentrate metals, reagents and clean, discharge-quality waters.

    While process water membrane treatment plants resemble conventional RO

    de-salting plants, they are different because of the materials of construction of the

    osmosis surfaces, the micro-hydrodynamics of the membrane elements themselves, and

    the customized, macro-hydrodynamic plumbing of the vessel arrays that constitute the

    treatment plant. These plant differences, plus a wide variation of glues, fabrics and other

    materials of construction enable the treatment of pH 1pH 13 solutions, and have opened

    up a new world of micro-, ultra-, nano- and hyper-filtration treatment opportunities. The

    new paradigm of solution treatments involves the removal of organics and precipitated

    and suspended solids, and ion separations, including simple demineralization, multi-valent

    ion separation from mono-valent ions and tri-multi-valent species separation from di-multi-

    valent ion species.

    2.0 Objectives

    The main objective of this work is presenting state-of-the-art process alternatives

    using membrane technology to face four treatment issues common in the copper, gold

    and in general all the mining industry regarding process waters and streams that offer

    treatment challenges to the metallurgical and process engineers.

    This paper presents flow sheets for: a) acid-mine-drainage treatment circuits with,

    and without, copper recovery; b) the treatment of gold mill barren for the production of low

    metals content discharge water; c) the treatment of raffinate and/or electrolyte for the

    recovery of organic; and d) the treatment of copper-gold cyanide PLS, a special,

    2

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    3/10

    proprietary sub-set of cyanide treatment that is an enabling technology for the treatment

    of copper gold ores.

    It also contains experimental data and results from the treatment applications in

    bench, pilot and industrial-scale membrane plants worldwide.

    3. Appl ication and Data Collection

    Membrane Technology

    Membranes reject species on multiple levels, including the absolute size or shape of

    specific non-charged molecules, the charge, charge density and degree of hydration of

    charged inorganic salts, and, for organic compounds, on the basis of molecular weight

    considerations.

    Figure 1: Cut-away of Spiral-wound Membrane Element

    Spiral-wound membrane elements (Figure 1) are the preferred membrane type for

    mining applications due to the polyamide and fabric characteristics and design that

    promotes turbulence flow through the membrane surface, avoiding solids precipitation as

    they concentrate.

    Both filtration and membrane processes are classified in terms of the pore size of the

    barrier to the solid particle or ion respectively in an aqueous media. These processes can

    be classified as micro-filtration (removes solid particles up to 0.2 to 0.4 microns),ultra-filtration (removes solid particles up to 30-50 Armstrong), nano-filtration (removes

    ions in the range of 5 to 10 Armstrong) and hyper-filtration (removes ions in the range of 1

    to 5 Armstrong). This can be observed in Figure 2.

    3

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    4/10

    Particulates

    MF 0.2 to 0.4

    "In" H2O

    DetergentsProtein

    BacteriaUF1 0.01 to 0.04

    StarchGelatin

    UF2 0.003 to 0.00 30 to 50

    Metal IonsDyesSO42+ CA2+

    NF 5to 10

    AcidsNaNO3Cl

    -

    HF 1to 5

    H2O

    Figure 2: Filtration and Separation Spectrum

    Bench Testing

    The first step in the development of the membrane option for the treatment of a mining

    process or waste water is bench testing. Typically, 20-liter samples of candidate waters

    are recovered (if available) and analyzed. The analysis thats done must recognize the

    goal(s) of the water treatment (metals concentration?, clean discharge water

    production?, organic recovery?) as well as the membrane treatment variables of

    importance like gypsum scale formation potential, dissolved silica contents, chloride

    (corrosion), temperature, pH and the like. The bench membrane test enables the selectionof membrane type and quantification of element-by-element separation efficiencies. The

    bench test is the first indication of the degree of success attainable using membranes for

    each of the goals of any described process or waste water treatment problem. This

    relative degree of success can be further defined in regards the development of order-of-

    magnitude, budgetary level, capital and operating costs.

    Site Pilot Testing

    The next step in the membrane process design is the performance of an on-site pilottest (this assumes a reliable flow of candidate water is available). During this period an

    entire process is evaluated in real time. Over the years, HWPT has discovered the most

    important considerations for new applications always focus upon: pretreatment, proper

    membrane selection, proper element construction, rejection of metals by the membranes,

    4

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    5/10

    percentage of overall recovery and, very importantly, development of an effective and

    efficient membrane cleaning regime.

    Figure 3: HWPTs laboratory bench equipment and 10 GPM pilot system

    used for on-site process development.

    A) Ac id-mine-drainage treatment c ircu its wi th , and w ithout , copper recovery

    Acid mine drainage can be successfully processed and made adequate for discharge

    using membrane technology.

    Figure 4: AMD treatment circuits without and with copper recovery

    The pre-treatment stage consists of a solid liquid separation using a combination of

    traditional filtering systems such as sand, bag or cartridge filters followed by an ultra-

    filtration stage.

    The ultra-filtration stage uses membranes with bigger pore sizes than hyper- or nano-

    filtration membranes (0.04 microns) and works on high recovery and low operating

    pressure.

    This pre-treatment phase generates clear water with very low suspended solids

    content (TSS), able to be processed through the ion separation membranes.

    5

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    6/10

    The membrane process will generate two process streams: the larger process stream

    that will contain very little dissolved solids (TDS), which is called permeate, and a smaller

    volumetric flow which contains all the feed chemical species concentrated, hence a high

    TDS content, called concentrateThis membrane process will be characterized by its recovery. The recovery is

    expressed as a percentage, and is defined as the amount of produced permeate water

    divided by the feed volumetric flow multiplied by 100.

    The recovery will depend on the feed water chemistry, dissolved solids (TDS) content

    and temperature.

    A typical process would be on the 65-70% recovery range. Recovery in this range

    results in a 3X concentration of the dissolved solids component of the feed water. For

    example, a 250 ppm CuSO4 feed water would be recovered to a 1/3rd

    volume, 750 ppmCu, membrane concentrate stream. The mentioned bench and pilot tests allow defining

    the achievable recovery to be expected on an industrial-scale operation.

    The produced permeate flow is very low in dissolved solids content and, relative to its

    metals content, is typically compliant with all requirements for discharge into the

    environment. Depending on the membrane used for the treatment, the pH characteristic

    of the permeate may or may not be different from that of the feed water. In the case of

    Acid Rock Drainage treatments, the pH of permeate is typically unchanged from that of

    the feed water, and a small addition of caustic or lime is required to make the permeatecircum-neutral. The permeate is also an ideal candidate for alternative uses like make-up

    water for flotation circuits, cooling towers and boilers.

    A cost-benefit evaluation is required to determine the advisability of recovery of

    valuable metals from a membrane concentrate.

    Alternatives for concentrate post treatment, as shown in Figure 4, include simple lime

    neutralization (FeCl3is referenced only as a typical flocculant additive) and SX recovery, a

    metals recovery method most specific to copper. Alternatively, for a copper AMD, the

    metals could be removed and the raffinate could be lime treated. In the end, under the

    best circumstance, the membrane treatment process for AMD can produce metal

    (copper), sludge filter-cake, and a 100% compliant volume of discharge water. In this

    case, except for waste solids, the treatment is a Zero-Liquid (waste)-Discharge (Z-L-D)

    process.

    6

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    7/10

    ElementEMSFeed

    (ppm)EMSConcentrate

    (ppm)EMSPermeate

    (ppm)

    SO4 7,300 23,000 126pH 2.84 2.62 3.14

    Al 563 1850 8Cu 1218 4175 28

    Fe 84 269 1.3

    Mg 324 1120 7.3

    Mo 0.03 0.02 0.01

    Na 30 128 3.0

    SiO2 REACTIVE 28 70

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    8/10

    their high pH, various metals traces including gold, cyanide content, high calcium and high

    carbonates or sulfates depending on the ore and processing characteristics.

    In order to maintain water balances during the mining operation, it is required to treat

    this barren stream, generating water that can be discharged in strict accordance to thedischarge regulations and standards.

    HWPT has designed, supplied and installed 1750 M3/Hr Engineered Membrane

    Separation System (EMS) at Yanacocha. Each individual skid produces 250 M3/Hr

    EMSPermeate and is pre-engineered to minimize field installation.

    This process has been on line for five years, assisting the mine with water balance

    and resource recovery. Operation has been simple and straightforward with a minimum

    amount of operator interface.

    Figure 5: Yanacocha 1000 m3/h EMSplant, the worlds largest

    membrane technology application in mining

    Resource recovery in the form of gold, cyanide and strict environmental compliance

    has made this investment by Newmont a huge success with the added value these plants

    provide.

    Yanacocha will add two more treatment plants (500 m3/h of produced permeate) to be

    installed during 2010.

    Merrill-CroweBarren

    Solution

    ConcentrateReturned

    to Process

    Discharge toEnvironment

    EMS

    System

    Figure 6: Yanacocha treatment flow sheet

    8

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    9/10

    C) Treatment of raffinate and/or electrolyte for the recovery of organic

    The membrane treatment of raffinate and electrolyte provide a low-pressure, high-

    efficiency copper SX-organic recovery method.

    EMS

    Return Organicto SX

    Raffinate 95% by-volumeto Heap

    EMS

    Return to SX

    Rich ElectrolyteTo EW Cells

  • 8/10/2019 TT 145 Final

    10/10

    Heap

    Gold Recovery

    EMS

    SystemCu CN Cu Rec'

    CN

    Au CNCuCN

    CuAuCN

    Figure 8: Treatment of copper-gold streams

    Conclusions

    EMSmembrane technology has been successfully and cost-effectively applied to

    mining and refinery process and wastewater streams. It enhances separation processes

    in a robust, reliable, and cost-effective manner.

    Bench and pilot testing allows setting the design basis for a large industrial-scale

    efficient process uniquely designed to fit the application requirements.

    Both permeate and concentrate provide added value to the projects. Low operator

    input, low maintenance, high availability, and smaller footprint than traditional water

    treatment systems are also benefits from using the membrane technology on mining.

    Mining applications and required separations provide a large variety of solutions the

    industry requires to improve the performance, availability and results from the extraction

    processes.

    10