Upload
hanhu
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
15/06/2012
1
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor www.ciat.cgiar.org
Tropical forages to enhance sustainable intensification of mixed systems in Central America and the Caribbean
R. van der Hoek, M. Peters, M. Mena, R. Schultze-Kraft, A. Schmidt and I. Rao
Tropical Forages
SPFCIC, San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 2012
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Outline
• Setting
• Mixed systems
• Forages in mixed systems in Central-America
• CIAT work in mixed systems
Drought-adapted forages
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Agroforestry practices with forage components
Forages for monogastrics
• Conclusions and perspectives
15/06/2012
2
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Setting Challenges – population growth and climate change
• Unsustainable intensification of land use
• Severe land degradation as a consequence of inadequate management practices
• Increasing demand animal products
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Tropical Forage Program R&D Strategy
Forage germplasm development
Productivity and
nutritive value
Seed production
Adaptation to biotic/abiotic stresses
High value forages to capture
differentiated markets
Forages included into crop-livestock systems
to realize livelihood and environmental
benefits
Eco-efficient agriculture
Releases of stress
adapted and productive
forages
Increased income and reduced
labor
Increased smallholder
competitiveness
Reversing land degradation
Mitigation of
climate change
Management
Processing
15/06/2012
3
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Three Priority Regions
Latin America and the Caribbean
• Germplasm Development, High Value Opportunities, Livelihoods and Environment
• Focus countries: Nicaragua, Honduras, Colombia, Haiti
Southeast Asia
• Livelihoods, High Value Opportunities (Environment)
• Focus countries: Laos, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Thailand
Eastern, Central and Southern Africa
• High Value Opportunities, Livelihoods
• Focus countries: DR Congo, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Outline
• Setting
• Mixed systems
• Forages in mixed systems in Central-America
• CIAT work in mixed systems
Drought-adapted forages
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Agroforestry practices with forage components
Forages for monogastrics
• Conclusions and perspectives
15/06/2012
4
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Agricultural systems in the world
Source: Steinfeld et al., 2006
Areas dominated by landless production
Mixed, irrigated
Mixed, rainfed
Grazing
Other types
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Role of mixed systems • Largest category of agricultural systems
• Combine crops and animals
• Animals provide added value and produce nutritious food
• Offer a good potential for ecologically and economically efficient agriculture, reducing risks and offering new opportunities
Mixed systems
15/06/2012
5
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Mixed systems in Central American hillsides: some characteristics (Yoro, Honduras)
0
2
4
6
< 800 m 800 - 1200 m > 1200 m
Total Coffee
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
< 800 m 800 - 1200 m > 1200 m
Maize Bean
0
5
10
15
< 800 m 800 - 1200 m > 1200 m
Cattle Pigs
Land tenure, per household (ha)
Animal ownership, per household (units)
Maize and bean yield (t/ha)
• Precipitation: 1000- 1200 mm, 5-6 months dry season (Nov-Apr)
• Majority of farmers small-scale, largely subsistence
• Systems based on maize, beans, coffee, some monogastrics, some cattle (“double purpose”)
• Feed resources: “naturalized” pastures, crop residues
Source: Van der Hoek, 2009
Mixed systems
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Outline
• Setting
• Mixed systems
• Forages in mixed systems in Central-America
• CIAT work in mixed systems
Drought-adapted forages
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Agroforestry practices with forage components
Forages for monogastrics
• Conclusions and perspectives
15/06/2012
6
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Forages for mixed systems
• Multipurpose forages: essential interface between crop and animal component in mixed systems
• Wide range of options to improve environmental and socioeconomic sustainability in fragile environments
– Soil fertility
– Animal production
– Weed control
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Characteristics of forages for mixed systems - grasses
Niche Use Observation
Andropogon gayanus Wide range, well-drained soils, drought-adapted.
Grazing, cut-and-carry, cattle.
Good seed production.
Brachiaria brizantha (various cultivars incl. cvs. Marandú, Toledo)
Wide range, well-drained soils, drought-adapted.
Grazing, cut-and-carry, cattle.
Good seed production.
Brachiaria hybrids (cvs. Mulato , Caymán)
Wide range, well-drained/”waterlogged” soils, drought-adapted, medium-high soil fertility.
Grazing, cut-and-carry, cattle. Trials with monogastrics.
Low seed production, dependency on providers.
Brachiaria humidicola Wide range, including soils with poor drainage.
Grazing, cut-and-carry, cattle.
Option for humid areas.
Pennisetum sp. (Camerún, King Grass)
Wide range, well-drained soils.
Cut-and-carry, cattle.
Energy source during dry season.
Forages for mixed systems
15/06/2012
7
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Niche Use Observations
Canavalia brasiliensis
Integration in maize-bean systems during “dry season”. Wide range of soils. Subhumid, low-medium altitude.
Green manure, improved crop residues, dry season feed (milk).
Yield 2- 4 t/ha
Clitoria ternatea Small plots producing protein-rich feed. Medium-high fertility soils. Semi-arid, subhumid, low-medium altitude.
Green manure, dry season feed (milk).Monogastrics (pigs).
Yield 2- 4 t/ha
Lablab purpureus
Integration in maize-bean systems during “dry season”. Small plots producing protein-rich feed. Wide range of soils. Subhumid, low-medium-high altitude.
Green manure, improved crop residues, dry season feed (milk). Monogastrics (pigs).
Yield 2- 4 t/ha
Stylosanthes guianensis
Small plots producing protein-rich feed. Medium-high fertility soils. Semi-arid, subhumid, low-medium altitude.
Dry season feed. Protein bank. Monogastrics (pigs).
Yield 5-10 t/ha
Vigna unguiculata
Integration in maize-bean systems during “dry season”. Small plots producing protein-rich feed. Wide range of soils. Semi-arid-subhumid, low-medium altitude.
Green manure, improved crop residues, dry season feed (milk). Monogastrics (pigs, poultry), Human food.
Yield 1.5-3 t/ha
Characteristics of forages for mixed systems – herbaceous legumes
Forages for mixed systems
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Niche Use Observations
Cajanus cajan Wide range, well-drained soils. Cut-and-carry, grazing, cattle. Trials with monogastrics .Human food.
Semi-perennial. Rapid growth.
Cratylia argentea
Well drained acidic soils, drought tolerant. Altitude until 1200 m.
Cut-and-carry, grazing, cattle. Trials with monogastrics.
Slow initial growth, intolerant to clay soils. High forage quality.
Leucaena leucocephala
Well-drained, neutral-alkaline soils Cut-and-carry, grazing, cattle. Trials with monogastrics.
Susceptible to Psyllids and ants.
Forages for mixed systems
Characteristics of forages for mixed systems – shrub legumes
15/06/2012
8
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Cratylia argentea
• Altitude: 0-1200 m
• Soils: pH 3.8 - 6.0, low fertility, well-drained
• Climate: tolerates drought (6 - 7 months dry season)
• Good nutritional value (CP 18-30%)
• Uses: cut-and-carry, grazing, dry season supplement, green manure, firewood
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Outline
• Setting
• Mixed systems
• Forages in mixed systems in Central-America
• CIAT work in mixed systems
Drought-adapted forages
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Agroforestry practices with forage components
Forages for monogastrics
• Conclusions and perspectives
15/06/2012
9
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Forage research of CIAT and partners in Central-America and the Caribbean
Goal
Improve livelihoods of poor rural crop-livestock producers while contributing to eco-efficiency of production systems
General objective
explore the benefits of multipurpose forages for improving agricultural productivity while reducing the ecological footprint of crop-livestock systems
Focus
• Divers animal species (ruminants and monogastrics)
• High value opportunities
• Livelihoods and environment
• Systems
• Scaling
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Drought vulnerable areas in Central- America
Source: FAO, 2002
Vulnerable areas
< 4 months dry season 4-6 months dry season > 6 months dry season
Drought adapted forages
15/06/2012
10
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Agronomic evaluations
• Data CIAT genebank
• On-station germplasm evaluation
• On-farm germplasm evaluation
Drought adapted forages
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Participatory evaluations
• Grasses (Brachiaria Toledo, Mulato)
• Multipurpose legumes (Vigna, Lablab, Canavalia)
• Shrub legumes (Cratylia)
• Criteria, preferences
A.g.
B.h. 36061
B.b. 16322
B.b. 26110
B.b. 26646
B.d. 6133
P.m. 16031
Camerun
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
minprep maxprep
Preferences of participatory evaluations of grasses during periods of minimum and
maximum precipitation
Drought adapted forages
15/06/2012
11
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
• Drought adapted grasses
• Grasses for cut-and-carry
• Protein banks
• Forage trees
Evaluations with introduced germplasm
Introduce drought adapted forages with high nutritive value allowing for dry season milk production
• Agronomic aspects - production
• Management
• Seed production
• Commercialization
Drought adapted forages
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
The case of Emprasefor, Honduras
• Varying results caused by unforeseen climatic events in combination with low input use
• Strong recovery capacity
• Diversification into related activities like concentrate production
• Replicable with modest investment
Farmers’ group–with strategic support from CIAT and local partners – established and maintains a seed company based on Brachiaria brizantha cv. “Toledo” during 8 años
Drought adapted forages
15/06/2012
12
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Evaluations of conserved forages
• Silage of grasses/legumes
• Hay of grasses/legumes
Promote dry-season conservation of forages while optimizing nutritive value
Drought adapted forages
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Evaluacions based on mixed-cropping with cereals
• Improved crop residues
Drought-adapted legumes in association with maize to increase quality of crop residues.
Drought adapted forages
15/06/2012
13
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Canavalia brasiliensis : a climate hardy covercrop
Major attributes
• Its deep rooting ability contributes to efficient use of resources (nutrients and water) keeping the crop green throughout the dry season
• Fixes 20-50 kg N ha-1 until well into the dry season when integrated as green manure in the traditional maize-bean system
• Increases animal feed availability and quality leading to five kg day-
1 ha-1 more milk
Perspectives
• Tolerant also to waterlogging conditions and shade
• Farmers are engaged in validation and seed production
• Submitted for cultivar release in Nicaragua 2012 (Colombia planned for 2013)
Feed biomass availability increases by a tonne per ha
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
N balance with removal of canavalia
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
FC GR LP PT
site
kg
N p
er
ha
M/B M/C0% M/C50% M/C75% M/C100%
C. brasiliensis represents a net N input at the plot level when used as
green manure.. but cannot replace the mineral fertilizers.
C. brasiliensis represents a net N output from the plot when removed
to be used as forage.
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Trade-offs ….
15/06/2012
14
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Agroforestry practices with forage components
• Integration of livestock component into “Quesungual” slash and mulch agroforestry system with maize and beans as major crops (Nicaragua-Honduras)
Forage components
• Brachiarias hybrid cv. Mulato II and B. brizantha cv. Marandú to increase animal production in combination with forage legumes (for animal feed and crop rotation)
• Shrub legumes (i.e., Cratylia argentea, Leucaena leucocephala)
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Achievements
• Forage legumes for pigs can replace up to 30% of grain cereals. Silage offers additional advantages such as conservation for dry season use, easy transport and storage for marketing
Tropical forage legumes for monogastric animals
Constraints • Current feed resources: cereal grains, household & crop
residues, poorly available and/or expensive (concentrates)
• Low productivity, competition with human food
Context • Over 70% of smallholder families keep monogastrics (swine
and poultry) in backyard systems, with an important role for women and youth
Outlook
• Emerging outcomes include small credit schemes with improved pigs, improved sanitation, opportunities for biogas (with partners)
• Results have attracted high interest from farmers and institutions, and the technology is being disseminated at a larger scale
15/06/2012
15
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Outline
• Setting
• Mixed systems
• Forages in mixed systems in Central-America
• CIAT work in mixed systems
Drought-adapted forages
Integration of legumes in mixed systems
Agroforestry practices with forage components
Forages for monogastrics
• Conclusions and perspectives
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Conclusions
• Wide range of eco-efficient forage options developed with and for small and medium farmers in mixed systems
• Applicability in real conditions
• Limited impacts in terms of reach and scale (especially legumes)
15/06/2012
16
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Challenges and perspectives • Grasses and legumes for clay soils and humid areas
• Role of forages in restoration of degraded areas and mitigation of effects of climate change, in particular greenhouse gas emissions: carbon sequestering (including added value trough carbon schemes), reduction of methane emissions, biological nitrogen inhibition (BNI)
• Continued research into the effects of cover legumes – trade-off analyses, e.g., soil fertility versus animal production
• Forage options for small and monogastric livestock species emphasizing livelihoods of women farmers
• Farmer seed production
• Capacity development
• Dissemination of technologies, adoption enhancement
Eco-Efficient Agriculture for the Poor
Thank you