Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TREE SURVEY SCHEDULE (BS5837: 2012) SITE: FORMER DENBIGH EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY CENTRE, MIDDLE RD, DENBIGH SURVEYOR: A. HENDERSON
CLIENT: GRWP CYNEFIN ASSESSMENT DATE: 18 JULY 2016 PAGE 1 OF 4
BRIEF: ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VIEWING CONDITIONS: GOOD
JOB REFERENCE: 16/AIA/DEN/22
TREE NO.
T - Tree G - Group H- Hedge
SPECIES
(COMMON NAME)
AGE
HEIGHT (m) + CROWN CLEARANCE/DIRECTION OF GROWTH (N.S.E.W)
RADIAL CROWN SPREAD
(m)
N S E W
ST
EM
/
MU
LT
I-ST
EM
* D
IA.(m
m)
VITALITY
COMMENTS
MANAGEMENT
CATEGORY
& SUB-CATEGORY GRADING BS 5837
BS 5837 RADIUS
(m)
RPA (m2)
T1
Pine
M
16
4E
5
6
7
7
600 G
Prominent tree to Middle Road
Small retaining wall to south - roots likely to spread beneath
Tree appears in good health & vigour
Heavily Ivy encrusted around base of stem impeding inspection
E.R.C. 20+
Sever Ivy around base & re-inspect in 12 months
A2
7.2
163m²
T2
Beech
(Purple)
M
16
1N
5 4 4.5 4.5 720 G Significantly restricted rooting environment
Main access road over primary roots to east - boundary wall to west
E.R.C. ≤20
Could be considered for removal
B2
8.6
235m²
T3
Beech
(Purple)
M
MD In advanced decline with significant dieback in crown
Ganoderma butt & root decay fungi bracket at base to west
E.R.C. 0
Remove U
N/A
HEADINGS & ABBREVIATIONS TREE NO. REFERENCE NUMBER. REFER TO PLAN OR NUMBERED TAGS WHERE APPLICABLE (T = TREE, G = GROUP, H = HEDGE) SPECIES: COMMON NAME (LATIN NAMES AVAILABLE ON REQUEST) AGE RANGE/LIFE STAGE: Y = YOUNG, SM = SEMI MATURE, EM = EARLY MATURE, M = MATURE, PM = POST MATURE HEIGHT: ESTIMATED AND RECORDED IN METRES. APPROXIMATELY 1 IN 10 TREES ARE MEASURED USING A CLINOMETER AND THE REMAINDER ESTIMATED AGAINST THE MEASURED TREES CROWN SPREAD: MAXIMUM CROWN RADIUS MEASURED TO THE FOUR CARDINAL COMPASS POINTS FOR SINGLE SPECIMENS ONLY (MEASUREMENT FOR TREE GROUPS - MAXIMUM RADIUS OF THE GROUP) CROWN CLEARANCE & DIRECTION OF GROWTH: STEM DIA/MULTI-STEM DIA:
HEIGHT IN METERS OF CROWN CLEARANCE ABOVE ADJACENT GROUND LEVEL (TO INFORM ON GROUND CLEARANCE, CROWN/STEM RATIO AND SHADING) STEM DIAMETER - MEASURED AT APPROXIMATELY 1.5 METRES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL OR A COMBINATION OF STEMS FOR MULTI-STEMMED TREES
VITALITY: E.R.C. = ESTIMATED REMAINING CONTRIBUTION: BS 5837CATEGORY & SUB-CATEGORY GRADING: BS 5837 RADIUS & BS 5837 RPA:
A MEASURE OF PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION. D = DEAD, MD = MORIBUND, P = POOR, M = MODERATE, G = GOOD RELATIVE USEFUL LIFE EXPECTANCY (YEARS) A = HIGH QUALITY AND VALUE, B = MODERATE QUALITY AND VALUE, C = LOW QUALITY AND VALUE, U = UNSUITABLE FOR RETENTION (SUB-CATEGORY REFERS TO ARBORICULTURAL., LANDSCAPE AND CULTURAL/CONSERVATION VALUES) PROTECTIVE DISTANCE - RADIUS FROM THE CENTRE OF THE STEM TO THE LINE OF TREE PROTECTION (CONSTRUCTION EXCLUSION ZONE - CEZ) AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER ROOT PROTECTION AREA - BS 5837 (2012) ANNEX D (THE RECOMMENDATIONS STATE THAT THE RPA SHOULD BE CAPPED AT 707 M2) NOTE – ALL CALCULATIONS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DECIMAL
TREE SURVEY SCHEDULE (BS5837: 2012) SITE: FORMER DENBIGH EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY CENTRE, MIDDLE RD, DENBIGH SURVEYOR: A. HENDERSON
CLIENT: GRWP CYNEFIN ASSESSMENT DATE: 18 JULY 2016 PAGE 2 OF 4
BRIEF: ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VIEWING CONDITIONS: GOOD
JOB REFERENCE: 16/AIA/DEN/22
TREE NO.
T - Tree G - Group H- Hedge
SPECIES
(COMMON NAME)
AGE
HEIGHT (m) + CROWN CLEARANCE/DIRECTION OF GROWTH (N.S.E.W)
RADIAL CROWN SPREAD
(m)
N S E W
ST
EM
/
MU
LT
I-ST
EM
* D
IA.(m
m)
VITALITY
COMMENTS
MANAGEMENT
CATEGORY
& SUB-CATEGORY GRADING BS 5837
BS 5837 RADIUS
(m)
RPA (m2)
T4
Beech
(Purple)
M
10
1N
5
5.5
4
4
930 M
Small stunted tree due to inhospitable rooting environment
Tarmac hard standing over all primary roots
Large canker on stem to SE
Poor quality tree of no long-term viability
E.R.C. 0
Remove C1
11.2
391m²
T5
Hawthorn
M
9
1E
4 2 3 3 200 G Located outside western boundary beyond retaining wall with no access to survey
Stem appears decayed
E.R.C. <10
3rd party tree - N/A
C2
2.4
18m²
T6
Beech
(Purple)
FM
18
1E
8
6
7
7
1300 G
Prominent tree to locale
Located at top of downward sloping embankment with high retaining wall to north restricting root growth
Building and hard standing areas to south
Stem bifurcates to 4 main leaders from 2.5m -
Ivy clad stem impeding inspection
E.R.C. 20+
Sever Ivy at base A1
15
707m²
T7
Pine
M
19
16W
4
3
3
2
450 M
Poor structural form
Ivy clad stem impeding inspection
Insignificant tree of low value
E.R.C. 0
Remove & replace with better quality specimen tree
C1
5.4
92m²
TREE SURVEY SCHEDULE (BS5837: 2012) SITE: FORMER DENBIGH EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY CENTRE, MIDDLE RD, DENBIGH SURVEYOR: A. HENDERSON
CLIENT: GRWP CYNEFIN ASSESSMENT DATE: 18 JULY 2016 PAGE 3 OF 4
BRIEF: ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VIEWING CONDITIONS: GOOD
JOB REFERENCE: 16/AIA/DEN/22
TREE NO.
T - Tree G - Group H- Hedge
SPECIES
(COMMON NAME)
AGE
HEIGHT (m) + CROWN CLEARANCE/DIRECTION OF GROWTH (N.S.E.W)
RADIAL CROWN SPREAD
(m)
N S E W
ST
EM
/
MU
LT
I-ST
EM
* D
IA.(m
m)
VITALITY
COMMENTS
MANAGEMENT
CATEGORY
& SUB-CATEGORY GRADING BS 5837
BS 5837 RADIUS
(m)
RPA (m2)
T8
Pine
M
15
1S
1
3
1
2.5
260 M
Small insignificant tree
E.R.C. 10
Remove for development
C1
3.1
31m²
T9
Pine
M
18
4N
4
4
4
4
500 G
Prominent tree
Abuts boundary retaining wall
No visual defects
E.R.C. 20
Remove to accommodate new access
B2
6
113m²
T10
Beech
(Purple)
M
16
0.5E
5
7
7
7.5
720
G
Crown lifted in past leaving multiple pruning wounds - many have failed to callus
Prominent tree with no significant defects
E.R.C. 40+
Remove to accommodate new access
A1
8.6
235m²
T11
Cypress
M
11
0
2
2
2
2
350 G
No significant defects
Not a visually prominent or attractive specimen to locale - no loss in amenity if removed
E.R.C. 10
Remove for development
C1
4.2
55m²
T12
Beech
(Purple)
FM
16
1W
7
8
8
8
1180 M
Appears stressed with tip dieback in upper crown
Crown overhanging building to west
Reaching the end of its natural life
E.R.C. 40
Could be considered for removal & replacement with a better quality specimen tree
B2
14.2
630m²
TREE SURVEY SCHEDULE (BS5837: 2012) SITE: FORMER DENBIGH EDUCATION & TECHNOLOGY CENTRE, MIDDLE RD, DENBIGH SURVEYOR: A. HENDERSON
CLIENT: GRWP CYNEFIN ASSESSMENT DATE: 18 JULY 2016 PAGE 4 OF 4
BRIEF: ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VIEWING CONDITIONS: GOOD
JOB REFERENCE: 16/AIA/DEN/22
TREE NO.
T - Tree G - Group H- Hedge
SPECIES
(COMMON NAME)
AGE
HEIGHT (m) + CROWN CLEARANCE/DIRECTION OF GROWTH (N.S.E.W)
RADIAL CROWN SPREAD
(m)
N S E W
ST
EM
/
MU
LT
I-ST
EM
* D
IA.(m
m)
VITALITY
COMMENTS
MANAGEMENT
CATEGORY
& SUB-CATEGORY GRADING BS 5837
BS 5837 RADIUS
(m)
RPA (m2)
G1
Holly
M
≤4
0
2
2
2
2
200
G
Small insignificant trees easily replaced by new planting
E.R.C. 10
N/A C2
2.4
18m²
G2
Damson Pear Apple
Cotoneaster
M
≤11 4
4
4
4
≤300 M
Unattractive, unmanaged scrub and damaged trees of no value
E.R.C. 0
Remove C2
3.6
41m²
G3
Birch Cherry
Mountain Ash Willow
EM
≤10 ≤250 M
Located in central courtyard with no access to survey
Trees are not visually prominent being screening on all boundaries by the building
E.R.C. 0
Remove for development
C2
3
28m²
H1
Beech
M
1.8
20 G
Good quality boundary hedge offering screening to site
E.R.C. 20
N/A B2
0.3
Table 1 Cascade chart for tree quality assessment
Category and definition Criteria (including subcategories where appropriate) Identificationon plan
Trees unsuitable for retention (see Note)Category U
Those in such a conditionthat they cannot realisticallybe retained as living trees inthe context of the currentland use for longer than10 years
• Trees that have a serious, irremediable, structural defect, such that their early loss is expected due to collapse,including those that will become unviable after removal of other category U trees (e.g. where, for whateverreason, the loss of companion shelter cannot be mitigated by pruning)
• Trees that are dead or are showing signs of significant, immediate, and irreversible overall decline
• Trees infected with pathogens of significance to the health and/or safety of other trees nearby, or very lowquality trees suppressing adjacent trees of better quality
NOTE Category U trees can have existing or potential conservation value which it might be desirable to preserve;see 4.5.7.
See Table 2
1 Mainly arboricultural qualities 2 Mainly landscape qualities 3 Mainly cultural values,including conservation
Trees to be considered for retentionCategory A
Trees of high quality with anestimated remaining lifeexpectancy of at least40 years
Trees that are particularly goodexamples of their species, especially ifrare or unusual; or those that areessential components of groups orformal or semi-formal arboriculturalfeatures (e.g. the dominant and/orprincipal trees within an avenue)
Trees, groups or woodlands of particularvisual importance as arboricultural and/orlandscape features
Trees, groups or woodlandsof significant conservation,historical, commemorative orother value (e.g. veterantrees or wood-pasture)
See Table 2
Category B
Trees of moderate qualitywith an estimated remaininglife expectancy of at least20 years
Trees that might be included incategory A, but are downgradedbecause of impaired condition (e.g.presence of significant thoughremediable defects, includingunsympathetic past management andstorm damage), such that they areunlikely to be suitable for retention forbeyond 40 years; or trees lacking thespecial quality necessary to merit thecategory A designation
Trees present in numbers, usually growingas groups or woodlands, such that theyattract a higher collective rating than theymight as individuals; or trees occurring ascollectives but situated so as to make littlevisual contribution to the wider locality
Trees with materialconservation or othercultural value
See Table 2
Category C
Trees of low quality with anestimated remaining lifeexpectancy of at least10 years, or young trees witha stem diameter below150 mm
Unremarkable trees of very limitedmerit or such impaired condition thatthey do not qualify in higher categories
Trees present in groups or woodlands, butwithout this conferring on themsignificantly greater collective landscapevalue; and/or trees offering low or onlytemporary/transient landscape benefits
Trees with no materialconservation or othercultural value
See Table 2
BR
ITISHSTA
ND
AR
DB
S5837:2012
©Th
eB
ritishStan
dard
sIn
stitutio
n2012
•9
5m 10m
1
2
3
4
5*#
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
G1
G2*
G3*
H1
Sm Holly
Crown
Spread
Tree
Number
Category
Root
Protection
Area
13
Category A
(High Quality)
Category B
(Moderate Quality)
Do not scale from this drawing all dimensions to be
checked on site.
The copyright of this document resides with Tree
Solutions unless assigned in writing by the company
Job Ref:
Drawn By:
Scale: Date:
Revision:
AM
1-250@A1 July 2016
-
Title:
Preliminary Tree Constraints Plan
Project:
Former Denbigh Education & Technology Centre,
Middle Rd, Denbigh, LL16 3UT
Client:
Grwp Cynefin
Root Protection Area
Modified to Account for
Site Features
Legend
16/AIA/DEN/22 01
Drawing No:
W: www.tree-solutions.co.uk
T: 01244 389114
M: 07766 774508
Category C
(Low Quality)
Category U
(Dead/Dying/In Decline)
NOTES: Tree/group numbers marked with an * have
approximate locations. Trees marked with # have
approximate measurements as outside site boundary
with no access.
N
W E
S