3
Treatment of sequelae in permanent dentition after severe trauma in primary dentition CASE REPORT Oro fac ial tra uma s cause severe damage to bot h oro- den tal and gen era l hea lth. In add iti on to med ical and esthetic problems, psychological trauma of children and parents is a vital concern (1, 2). Devel opmen tal distu rbanc es in permanent denti tion mostly derive from the int rusive inj uri es in pri mar y dentition. This could be explained by the close relation of the apex of the primary teeth to their successors. Upper inciso rs are mos t fre que ntl y sub jec ted to trauma; the hi ghes t inci de nc e is observed be tween the ages of  1–3 years (1, 3, 4). Trauma to pr imary de nt it ion may cause de lay in erup tion, local hypop lasia, malfo rmatio ns and dilac er- ations in permanent te eth. Fr om a cl inical aspe ct , malformation may vary from local areas of opaque to disco lorat ion with exte nsive hypo plasia or crown/roo t dilacerations (5–7). Root dilaceration is more common than dilaceration of the crown. Crown dilaceration of a permanent tooth accounts for 3% of traumatic injuries to dev elopin g tee th. It usually involves the maxilla ry incisors (8). Treatment of a rare case of crown dilacer- ation of the max illa ry per man ent cen tral incisor and hypoplasia of the maxillary permanent lateral incisor is presented. Clinical case A 10-year-old girl with no systemic problem was referred to the pediatric dentistry clinic with esthetic problems in her permanen t uppe r right central and later al incis ors. According to the history of the patient, she had had a trauma to her pri mary upper right cen tra l and lat era l incisors when she was 18 months old. The trauma had occurred as a result of a fall and emergency treatment involving extraction of the traumatized teeth followed by suture of the gingiva was carried out at a hospital. Clinical evaluation revealed that there was a coronal dilaceration in the permanent right upper central incisor and hyp opl asi a in the pe rmanent right lat era l inc isor where the tooth was covered by gingiva (Figs 1 and 2). Ortopantomogram and occlusal radiographs were taken. Rad iograp hic nd ings rev eal ed no pat hol ogy of the periapical area and the teeth were vital (Figs 3 and 4). The level of the gingival margin of the dilacerated tooth was different from that of a normal incisor. Recontour- ing of the gingiva by periodontal surgery was planned. Prior to the surgery, the patient was given oral hygiene instructions and full-mouth periodontal cleaning. Tem- porar y compo site restoration of the dilacerate d tooth was pe rf orme d. Surgical tr eatment was pe rf ormed 2 weeks after the completion of the non-surgical phase. The teeth were anesthetized and the depths of path- ologic pockets in the surgery area were measured with a periodontal probe. Pocket elimination and recontouring of the gingiva around the involved teeth were performed by a gingivectomy procedure according to Goldman (9) (Fi g. 5). The primary inc ision at a level api cal to the bottom of the pocket was terminated and angulated to give the surface a distinct bevel. The secondary incision was pe rf o rm ed th roug h th e inte rd en tal a re a a nd detached gingiva was re move d wi th a sc ale r. Af ter probing to detect residual pockets, periodontal dressing was appl ied clos e to the bucc al and palatal wound surfaces as well as to interproximal spaces. The dressing Dental Traumatology 2008; 24: e31–e33; doi: 10.1111/ j.1600-965 7.2008.006 21.x Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwel l Munksgaa rd e31 Aslı Topaloglu Ak 1 , Ece Eden 1 , Ozgun Ozcaka Tasdemir 2 Departments of 1 Pediatric Dentistry and 2 Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey Correspondence to: Dr Asl ı Topaloglu Ak, Pedodontics Department, Ege University Dental Faculty, P.K: 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey Tel.: +90 232 3886421 Fax: +90 232 3880325 e-mail: aslitopal oglu@yah oo.com Accepted 23 April, 2007 Abstract – A case with a dilacerated upper right central and hypoplastic upper right lateral incisors covered with gingiva of a 10-year-old female, with a history of trauma at the age of 18 months, is presented. After clinical and radio- graphical evaluations, esthetic problem was solved with gingivectomy followed by composite restorations of the involved teeth.

Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

7/30/2019 Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/treatment-of-sequelae-in-permanent-dentition-after-trauma-in-primary-dentition 1/3

Treatment of sequelae in permanent dentitionafter severe trauma in primary dentition

CASE REPORT

Orofacial traumas cause severe damage to both oro-dental and general health. In addition to medical andesthetic problems, psychological trauma of children andparents is a vital concern (1, 2).

Developmental disturbances in permanent dentitionmostly derive from the intrusive injuries in primarydentition. This could be explained by the close relation of the apex of the primary teeth to their successors. Upperincisors are most frequently subjected to trauma; thehighest incidence is observed between the ages of 1–3 years (1, 3, 4).

Trauma to primary dentition may cause delay ineruption, local hypoplasia, malformations and dilacer-ations in permanent teeth. From a clinical aspect,malformation may vary from local areas of opaque todiscoloration with extensive hypoplasia or crown/rootdilacerations (5–7). Root dilaceration is more commonthan dilaceration of the crown. Crown dilaceration of a

permanent tooth accounts for 3% of traumatic injuriesto developing teeth. It usually involves the maxillaryincisors (8). Treatment of a rare case of crown dilacer-ation of the maxillary permanent central incisor andhypoplasia of the maxillary permanent lateral incisor ispresented.

Clinical case

A 10-year-old girl with no systemic problem was referredto the pediatric dentistry clinic with esthetic problems inher permanent upper right central and lateral incisors.According to the history of the patient, she had had atrauma to her primary upper right central and lateral

incisors when she was 18 months old. The trauma hadoccurred as a result of a fall and emergency treatmentinvolving extraction of the traumatized teeth followed bysuture of the gingiva was carried out at a hospital.

Clinical evaluation revealed that there was a coronaldilaceration in the permanent right upper central incisorand hypoplasia in the permanent right lateral incisorwhere the tooth was covered by gingiva (Figs 1 and 2).Ortopantomogram and occlusal radiographs were taken.Radiographic findings revealed no pathology of theperiapical area and the teeth were vital (Figs 3 and 4).The level of the gingival margin of the dilacerated toothwas different from that of a normal incisor. Recontour-ing of the gingiva by periodontal surgery was planned.

Prior to the surgery, the patient was given oral hygieneinstructions and full-mouth periodontal cleaning. Tem-porary composite restoration of the dilacerated toothwas performed. Surgical treatment was performed

2 weeks after the completion of the non-surgical phase.The teeth were anesthetized and the depths of path-

ologic pockets in the surgery area were measured with aperiodontal probe. Pocket elimination and recontouringof the gingiva around the involved teeth were performedby a gingivectomy procedure according to Goldman (9)(Fig. 5). The primary incision at a level apical to thebottom of the pocket was terminated and angulated togive the surface a distinct bevel. The secondary incisionwas performed through the interdental area anddetached gingiva was removed with a scaler. Afterprobing to detect residual pockets, periodontal dressingwas applied close to the buccal and palatal woundsurfaces as well as to interproximal spaces. The dressing

Dental Traumatology 2008; 24: e31–e33; doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00621.x

Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard e31

Aslı Topaloglu Ak 1, Ece Eden1,

Ozgun Ozcaka Tasdemir2

Departments of 1Pediatric Dentistry and2Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege

University, Izmir, Turkey

Correspondence to: Dr Aslı Topaloglu Ak,Pedodontics Department, Ege University

Dental Faculty, P.K: 35100 Bornova, Izmir,TurkeyTel.: +90 232 3886421Fax: +90 232 3880325e-mail: [email protected]

Accepted 23 April, 2007

Abstract – A case with a dilacerated upper right central and hypoplastic upperright lateral incisors covered with gingiva of a 10-year-old female, with a historyof trauma at the age of 18 months, is presented. After clinical and radio-graphical evaluations, esthetic problem was solved with gingivectomy followedby composite restorations of the involved teeth.

Page 2: Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

7/30/2019 Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/treatment-of-sequelae-in-permanent-dentition-after-trauma-in-primary-dentition 2/3

was removed 7 days later and after gingival healing finalrestorations were performed by using a micromotor anda handpiece with diamond and steel burs. A salivasuction device and cotton wool rolls were used for

isolation. Teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acidfor 15 s, cleaned with water and air dried. After theapplication of dentin bonding system (Scothbond Multi-purpose; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) final restorationswere completed with composite resin (Filtek Z 250; 3M

ESPE) in approximately 2-mm-thick layers. Each incre-ment was light cured for 40 s using a halogen-curing light(Digital Optilight, Gnatus, Brazil). The restorations werethen polished using extra-fine diamond finishing bursand alumina-oxide-containing disks (Fig. 6).

Discussion

It has been stated that children are more likely toencounter trauma between 18 and 30 months as theystart walking. Falls are the most frequent traumas inboth genders. Intrusions and avulsions are observed asthe most severe injuries involving incisors (10, 11) Analteration in the secretory phase of the ameloblasts of the

Fig. 1. Intraoral view of upper right central and lateral incisors.

Fig. 3. Ortopantomograph.

Fig. 5. Gingivectomy procedure on upper right central andlateral incisors.

Fig. 4. Occlual radiograph.

Fig. 2. Dilacerated upper right central incisor and hypoplasicupper right lateral incisor covered with gingiva.

e32 Ak et al.

Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard

Page 3: Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

7/30/2019 Treatment of Sequelae in Permanent Dentition After Trauma in Primary Dentition

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/treatment-of-sequelae-in-permanent-dentition-after-trauma-in-primary-dentition 3/3

underlying permanent tooth germs may result in enamelhypoplasia whereas dilacerations of the crown or theroot and discoloration are the other alterations observedin permanent dentition (6, 11). Furthermore, odontomasor malformations may be severe cases that requirecomplex treatment approaches (6).

Formation of the germs of the permanent uppercentral and lateral incisors takes place at 20 weeks of gestation and calcification begins at the age of 3–4months and 10–12 months respectively (12). Hence, inour case, following the trauma, the dental follicules mayhave been affected resulting in malformed permanentteeth to erupt as the trauma had occurred at the age of 18 months.

Pain management and prevention of permanent teethgerms must be our main goal in the treatment strategy of the traumatized primary teeth. Due to behavior man-agement problems or a severe trauma with a soft-tissuebleeding, treatment of the traumatized primary teethmay be overlooked or treatment may be limited toextraction (13, 14). However, in the overall treatment,primary teeth must be followed up clinically andradiographically in the long term, so that sequelae of the permanent teeth could be treated as well.

Recently, improvements in adhesive dentistry pro-vided successful results by conservative, one-step resto-rations by which less damage is given to healthy toothtissues. Composite restorative materials are both esthetic

and long lasting. Composite resin restorations can alsobe immediate solutions for improving the esthetic qualityof the restored teeth (15).

Developmental disturbances occurring in permanentdentition after a trauma in primary dentition can causeesthetic and functional problems. In our case, a conser-vative approach with a minor surgical treatment gavevery satisfactory results. Dentists must encourage con-servative treatments of such cases rather than extractionor prosthetic treatment approach for more functional

and esthetic results.

References

1. Cardoso M, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Traumatized primary

teeth in children assisted at the Federal University of Santa

Catarina, Brazil. Dent Traumatol 2002;18:129–33.

2. Marato M, Barberia E, Planells P, Vera V. Treatment of a non

vital immature incisor with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

Dent Traumatol 2003;19:165–9.

3. Cunha RF, Pugliesi DM, Mello Vieira AE. Oral trauma in

Brazilian patients aged 0–3 years. Dent Traumatol

2001;17:210–2.

4. Fried I, Erickson P. Anterior tooth trauma in the primary

dentition. Incidence, classification, treatment methods and

sequelae: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child1995;62:256–61.

5. Pomarico L, Riberio de Souza IP, Primo LG. Multidisciplinary

therapy for treating sequelae of trauma in primary teeth:

11 years of follow-up and maintenance. Quintessence Int

2005;36:71–5.

6. Arenas M, Barberia E, Lucavechi T, Maroto M. Severe trauma

in the primary dentition-diagnosis and treatment of sequelae in

permanent dentition. Dent Traumatol 2006;22:226–30.

7. Diab M, elBadrawy HE. Intrusion injuries of primary incisors.

Part III. Effects on the permanent successors. Quintessence Int

2000;31:377–84.

8. Maragakis MG. Crown dilaceration of permanent incisors

following trauma to their primary predecessors. J Clin Pediatr

Dent 1995;20:49–52.

9. Goldman HM. Gingivectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1951;4:1136–57.

10. Osuji OO. Traumatised primary teeth in Nigerian children

attending University Hospital: the consequences of delays in

seeking treatment. Int Dent J 1996;46:165–70.

11. Flores MT. Traumatic injuries in the primary dentition. Dent

Traumatol 2002;18:287–98.

12. Mc Donald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and

adolescent, 5th edn. St Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1987.

p. 190–1.

13. Merkle A. Complete intrusion of a maxillary right primary

central incisor. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:151–2.

14. Ram D, Holan G. Partial pulpotomy in a traumatized primary

incisor with pulp exposure: case report. Pediatr Dent

1994;16:44–8.

15. El-Askary FS, Ghalab OH, Eldemerdash FH, Ahmed OI,

Fouad SA, Naqy MM. Reattachment of a severely traumatizedmaxillary central incisor, one-year clinical evaluation: a case

report. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:343–9.

Fig. 6. Composite resin restorations of upper right central andlateral incisors.

Treating sequelae of permanent teeth caused by trauma in primary teeth e33

Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard