Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    1/13

    Treatment of Crude Oil-BrineEmulsions with Ceramic

    Membranes

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 1

    Ian Rubinstein Ph.D. P.Chem.

    Rubinstein Technical Corporation

    Phone/Fax: (403) 281-8259 E-mail: [email protected]

    PO Box 1382, Station M, Calgary, Alberta T2P 2L6, Canada

    Industrial Water Consulting

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    2/13

    PRODUCED WATER DEOILING CHALLENGES

    Variable feed rate, pressures, temperaturesVariable levels of oil, solids, contaminants

    Harsh operating environment

    Upset, shutdown, startup events

    Minimize maintenance events

    Minimize chemical stockage and disposal

    Minimize capital and operating expenses

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 2

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    3/13

    OBJECTIVES

    Remove solids and oil droplets to

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    4/13

    OIL SANDS PRODUCED WATER DEOILING

    Skim Tank Gas Flotation Coalescer

    ORF

    OilRecycle

    Emulsion Water

    Oil

    RecycleEmulsion Water

    Membrane Bank

    90C

    140C

    CURRENT PROCESS

    MEMBRANE PROCESS

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 4

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    5/13

    CROSSFLOW MEMBRANE PROCESS

    E

    L

    E

    ME

    N

    T

    S

    CONCENTRATE

    PERMEATE

    Feed Pump Backpulse Pump

    Perm

    Tank

    FEED

    EMULSION

    gross

    net

    ForwardFlush

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 5

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    6/13

    OPERATING ISSUES AND RESPONSES

    Coalescing of oil droplets in gel layerTurbulent crossflow through feed channels

    Droplet deformation and squeeze through

    High shear to create rigid charged oil droplets

    Droplet and bubble blockage of pores

    Permeate backpulse

    Deposition of scales

    Non-chemical cleaning regimes

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 6

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    7/13

    FIELD TESTS IN CSS OIL SANDS PLANTFirst Generation Bench Scale Elements

    Primary Separator Emulsion

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Hours

    Flux(m3/m2

    .day) Feed: 400 KPa, 1.5 metres/sec, 95C

    With cleaning regime

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 7

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    8/13

    PILOT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

    Good efficiency

    Net f lux > 10m3/m2.day

    High quality of treated water

    < 30 mg/L hydrocarbon spillover (mainly dissolved organics),

    no detectable solids

    Thermomechanical stabilityWithstands 100C temperature, 1% sand, 10% oil in feed

    Fouling overcome

    Membrane surface modification, cleaning regimes

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 8

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    9/13

    POTENTIAL OILY WATER APPLICATIONS

    SeparatorUF Bank Demin/Soften

    Evaporator/Crystallizer

    High OilSeparator

    PlantProcesses

    Oil out

    Feed

    Chemicals/Heat

    Salt disposalSolids disposal

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 9

    Free Oil/

    Water

    Emulsion

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    10/13RTC 21 Jun 2006 10

    2ndGENERATION CeraMem MEMBRANES

    Current: 142 mm diameter, 864 mm length

    Future: Up to 200 mm diameter, 1500 mm

    length

    - Silicon carbide supports

    eliminate durabil ityproblems of 1st generation

    - Chemically durable,abrasion and solvent-

    resistant- High process flux

    - High temperaturecapability

    - Easy cleaning,backflushable

    - Low-cost, long li fe

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    11/13

    1000 m3/DAY MEMBRANE SYSTEM

    FEED

    PERMEATE

    CONCENTRATE

    1036 m3/d

    0 KPa

    49 m3/d

    414 KPa

    987 m3/d

    0 KPa

    Recycle 5451 m3/d; 414 KPa1090 m3/d

    689 KPa

    Feed Pump: 1090 m3/d, p 414 KPa = 10 HPRecycle Pumps: 5724 m3/d, p 276 KPa = 45 HP totalBackpulse Pump: 545 m3/d, p 1034 KPa = 15 HP

    Membranes: 5 Trains of 2 elements (142 mm diam, 864 mm long) per train

    Backpulse

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 11

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    12/13RTC 21 Jun 2006 12

    DE-OILING COST COMPARISON

    40,000 m3/d Produced Water

    100,000 bopd Facility. SOR = 2.5

    ConventionalDeoiling.

    (Skim Tank, ISF,Filters)

    CeramicMembraneDeoiling.

    (Surge Tank,Membranes)

    CAPEX.

    Total Installed

    Cost

    $28,122,000 Can $22,949,000 Can

    OPEX.

    Per m3 watertreated

    $0.165 Can

    (power + chemicals)

    $0.056 Can

    (power +membrane

    replacement every3 years)

    FOOTPRINT.

    Square metres

    14,250 6,400

  • 7/27/2019 Treatment of Crude Oil-Brine Emulsions With Ceramic Membranes

    13/13

    RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

    Accepts % levels of oil and solids in water

    Permeate has no visible oil or solids

    Membrane surface and cleaning regimes tailored

    for oil sands produced water deoiling

    Flux maintained above economic target level

    RTC 21 Jun 2006 13

    Next step: Full sized demonstration

    Evaluate stability, lifespan, process economics

    18% lower Capex, 66% lower Opex than conventional process