Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Transregional learning and collaboration
Opportunities for an effective cooperation in innovation
S3 PlatformAlessandro RainoldiBaiona, 7 Nov 2014
2
Smart Specialisation Platform
Created in 2011 to provide science-basedprofessional advice to EU national and regionalpolicy-makers for the establishment and implementation of their RIS3, make better use of the ESI Funds and thus contribute to the Europe 2020 goals.
Managed by JRC-IPTS in Seville in the frame of a wider EC effort including DG REGIO, RTD, ENTR, EAC, CNECT, ENER, AGRI.
A privileged perspective:
Outside the Commission - Support to countries and regions developing and implementing their RIS3 and to their "triple/quadruple helix" partnershipsInside the Commission - Support to the policy DGs (namely in assessing ESIF programming documents: 28 Partnership Agreements and more than 180 Operational Programmes)In the scientific community - Contribution to the conceptual and methodological debate around smart specialisation
S3 Platform - Some achievements
•Wide membership: 155 regions + 16 countries
•Strong endorsement by policy makers:average 4.5/5 satisfaction rankings(86% rankings at least 4/5; 100% at least 3/5)
•High “fidelisation rate”:> 50% of regions attending workshops come back
•Political endorsement at EU level: EC (Hahn), EP (Winkler), CoR (Markkula), Council (Van Rompuy)
•Scientific impact: 9 published articles + 3 in progress (mainly on: applied network analysis; place-based analysis; peer learning) + 10 policy briefs + 6 working papers
•52 regional and 16 national RIS3 peer-reviewed under own-developed methodology inspired by trans-national mutual learning objective
4
Main activities of S3 Platform in support of the countries/regions preparing RIS3
2. Trans-national learning, Peer Review & thematic workshops
4. RIS3 assessmentand support to REGIO desks ; ICT experts
3. Country- and Macro-region events and targeted seminars
at IPTS
6. Interactive tools, S3 Newsletter and
Website
1. The RIS3methodological
Guide & the Digital Agenda Toolbox
5. Transregional collaboration
7. Research agenda
Eye@RIS3
5
Peer review of RIS3
� Own methodology inspired by trans-national mutual
learning objective and: (i) exchange of roles;
(ii) concentration in space and time; (iii) mix of
peers and experts; (iv) focus on questions defined
by countries/regions under review
� No. of peer-reviews workshops: 17 (from Jan 2012 to Nov 2014)
� Peer reviewed regions: 52
� Peer reviewed countries: 16
� Average no of regions/countries present
at each workshop: 25
� Average participants at each workshop: 56
http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/peer-review
...it was an interesting exercise which made us more conscious of the elements in the RIS3 process
...it made us introduce changes in the on-going RIS3 process
...it made us change substantially how we work with the RIS3 process
5 50% 27% 9%
4 36% 23% 9%
3 9% 36% 41%
2 0% 5% 14%
1 0% 5% 18%
na 5% 5% 9%6
Peer review of RIS3The impact on the process
(questionnaire to peer-reviewed regions/countries, Nov 2013)
Guidance – analysis – supporting tools
Comprehensive guidance tools – RIS3 Guide, Digital Agenda Toolbox, FAQs
S3 Publication series - Policy briefs co-authored with lead academics (Foray, Boschma, Rodriguez-Pose, Goddard) and practitioners; Working papers providing scientific analysis to contribute to conceptual and empirical developments related to smart specialisation
Supporting tools developed on: RIS3 self-assessment (assessment wheel); regional RIS3 priorities (Eye@RIS3), regional benchmarking, bilateral trade flows
All is publicly accessible on the web 7
Benchmarking regional structure
In our methodological proposal, we define as reference regions those that share similar structural conditions relevant for innovation-driven development. That is, characteristics that cannot be easily changed in the short term and that are demonstrated to affect the way innovation and economic evolution take place in a region.
The comparison is not based on performance nor it is aimed to select "best performers" as peers. The idea is rather that (i) policy learning is most likely to be effective if your peers are similar to you, and (ii) you can learn both from others' successes and failures.
8
9
Assessing EU cohesion policy programming documents
28 Partnership Agreements
Around 180 Operational Programmes dealing
with Thematic Objective 1 (R&I)
More than 500 intra- and
inter-service consultations
A comprehensive
view on ex-ante
conditionality requirements
ATBE
BGBG
BGCY
CY CZ
CZCZ
CZDE
DEDE
DEDE
DEDE
DEDE
DEDE
DEDE
DEDE
D KDK
EEEE
ELEL
ELEL
ELEL
ELEL
ELEL
ELEL
ELEL
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
ESES
F IFI
FRF R
FRFR
FRFR
FRFR
F RFR
FRF R
FRFR
FRFR
FRFR
FRFR
FRFR
FRFR
HRHR
HUIE
IEIE
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
ITIT
LTLT
LULU
LVLV
MTMT
NLNL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPL
PLPT
PTPT
PTPT
PTPT
PTRO
ROSE
SESE
SESE
SESE
SESE
SESI
SKSK
UKUK
UKUK
TO 1
PA
Austria
Wallonie PA
Bulgaria
Regional
OP
Smart
growth
OP
PA
Cyprus
Cyprus
OP
Enterpris
e and
innovati
on for
Integrate
d
regional
develop
PA Czech
Republic
Prague
OP
Baden
Württem
berg
Bayern Berlin
Branden
burg
Bremen Hambur
g
Hessen Mecklem
burg
Vorpom
mern
Niedersa
chsen
NRWRheinlan
d-Pfalz
Saarland Sachsen Sachsen
Anhalt
Schelswi
g
Holstein
Thüringe
n
National
OP
PA
Denmark
National
OP
PA
Estonia
Attica Centra l
Greece
Central
Macedo
nia
CreteEastern
Macedo
nia and
Thrace
Epirus Ionian
Islands
North
Aegean
PA
Greece
Pelopon
nisos
South
Aegean
Thessalia Western
Greece
Western
Macedo
nia
Andalucí
a
Aragón Asturias Baleares Basque
Country
Canarias Cantabri
a
Castilla
La
Mancha
Castilla y
León
Cata lonia Extrema
dura
GaliciaLa Rioja Madrid Murcia Nav arra PA Spain Valencia National
OP
PA
Finland
Alsace Aquitain
e
Auvergn
e
Basse
Norman
die
Bourgog
ne
Bretagne CentreChampa
gne
Ardenne
Corse Guadelo
upe
Haute
Norman
die
I le de
France
Langued
oc
Roussillo
n
Limous
in
Lorrain
e
Mayott
e
Midi
Pyréné
es
Nord
pas de
Calais
PACA Pays
de la
loire
Picardi
e
Poitou
Charen
tes
Rhone
Alpes
Franch
e
Comté
Compe
titivene
ss and
cohesi
PA
Croatia
PA
Hungar
y
BMW
Ireland
PA
Ireland
SE
Ireland
Abruzz
o
Basilicata Bolzano Emilia
Romagn
a
FVGImprese
e
competit
ività
Lazio Liguria Lomba
rdia
March
e
Molise PA
Italy
Piemo
nte
Puglia Sardeg
na
Toscan
a
Trento Umbria Valle
d'Aost
a
Veneto Nation
al OP
PA
Lithuan
ia
PA
Luxem
bourg
Luxem
bourg
Nation
al OP
PA
Latvia
Malta PA
Malta
PA
Netherl
ands
West Dolnos
laskie
Easter
n
Poland
Kujaws
ko
Pomor
skie
Lodzki
e
Lubels
kie
Lubusk
ie
Malop
olska
Mazow
ieckie
Opolsk
ie
PA
Poland
Podkarp
ackie
Podlaski
e
Pomorsk
ie
Slaskie Smart
growth
Swietokr
zskie
Warmins
ko
Mazurski
e
Wielkop
olskie
Zachodni
o
Pomorsk
ie
Açores Alentejo Algarve CentroLisboa Madeira Norte
PA
Portugal
Compe
titivitat
e
PA
Romania
East
Middle
Swede
n
Mellers
ta
Nor rla
nd
Nation
al OP
North
Middle
S wede
n
Övre
Nor rla
nd
PA
Swede
n
Sk åne
and
Bleking
e
Småland
and
Öarna
Stockh
olm
West
Swede
n
PA
Sloveni
a
PA
Slovaki
a
R&I OP Englan
d
Northern
I reland
Scotland Wales
Ex-ante cond itionality/ Criteria for fulfilmen t
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No Yes/No Yes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/NoYes/ No
Yes/NoYes/No
Yes/ NoYes/No
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/ No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/ No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/ NoYes/No
EAC 1.1. Researc h and innovation: The existen ce of a national or regional smart specialisation strategy in lin e with the
National Reform Programme, to leverage private research and innovation exp enditure, which complies with the featu res of
well-perfo rming n ational or region al research an d innovation systems .
A national or regional smart specialisation strategy is in place …
> The relev ant operational programme and the Partnership Agreement where appropriate contains a reference to the name of the
framework and indicates where it or its dif ferent elements are published (in a form of a link).
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
No
– is based on a S WOT or similar analysis to concentrate resources on a limited set of research and innovat ion prior it ies:
> there is evidence that a SWOT or a similar analysis has been conducted in order to establish prior it ies for investment No
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
Yes
> there is a description of the methodology used f or the analysis
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
> there is a description of the prioritisation/elimination process, including the involvement of stakeholders, and of its results
(entrepreneurial discovery process).
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
Yes
> the concentration of resources is explained
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
Yes
– out lines measures to stimulate private RTD inv estment:
> there is a description of the policy- mix planned to be used for the implementat ion of the strategy and indication which programme/
instrument will be used for their f unding,
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
> there is an explanation on how these measures are tailored to the needs of enterprises, in particular SMEs (e.g. des cription
of the "entrepreneurial disc overy process" used for the strategy development) , and other private R&I investors and/or which
other measures are undertaken to incentiv ise private research and innovation investments.
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
– conta ins a monitoring mechanism:
> there is a description of the methodology, including the chosen indicators, and governance structure of the monitor ing mechanism. NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
No
> there is a description of how the follow- up to the findings of the monitoring will be ensured.
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
No
A f ramework outlining available budgetary resources for research and innovation has been adopted.
> The relev ant operational programme contains a reference to the name of the framework and indicates where it is published ( in a
form of a link)
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
N oNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoN o
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoN o
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
Ye sNo
NoYes
NoNo
N oNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesY es
YesNo
Ye sNo
NoN o
YesYes
YesNo
NoYes
YesNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoYe s
NoNo
NoNo
Y esNo
NoNo
NoYe s
NoYe s
Ye sYes
YesNo
NoN o
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoN o
N oNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoN o
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoN o
NoNo
> A nat ional or regiona l framework outlining available budgetary resources for research and innovat ion has been adopted, indicating
var ious sources of finance [and indicative amounts] (EU, nat ional and other sources as appropria te) . The duration of the f ramework
must be relev ant for the programming period.
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
Y esNo
N oNo
No
Ye sNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoYes
Ye sYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoN o
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
N oNo
NoNo
Ye sYes
NoYes
Y esYes
N oNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesY es
YesNo
Ye sNo
NoN o
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYe s
NoNo
NoY es
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYe s
Ye sYes
YesNo
NoN o
YesYes
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoN o
N oNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesN o
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
N oN o
No
EAC 1.2 Research and innovation infrastrcuture: The existen ce of a multi-annual plan for budgeting and prioritization of
investments.
An indicative multi-annual plan for budgeting and prioritization of investments linked to EU priorit ies, and, where appropriate, the
European Strategy F orum on Research Infrastructures - ESFRI has been adopted.
> An indicative multi-annua l plan f or budget ing and prioritization of investments in R&I inf rastructure linked to EU priorities has been
adopted[ 3]:
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
o The prior it isat ion responds to the needs identified in the smart specialisat ion strategy;
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
No
o The prior it izat ion of investments took into account existing R&I infrastructures and capacities in Europe and as appropriate, the
priorities identified by the European Strategy F orum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI).
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesYes
Yes
o The f ramework outlines available and f oreseen budgetary resources for inv estments in R& I infrastructures and centres of
competences and indicates various sources of f inance [ and indicative amounts].
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
YesYes
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoYes
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes
NoNo
YesNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
NoNo
Yes
EA
C 1
.1 R
ese
arc
h a
nd
in
no
va
tio
n -
Sm
ar
spe
cia
liza
tio
n s
tra
teg
y
EA
C 1
.2 R
ese
arc
h a
nd
in
no
va
tio
n
infr
ast
ruct
ure
S3 Platform – Thematic activity
Development of mutual learning and sharing tools with respect to the implementation of RIS3 and the alignment of innovation roadmaps across Europe.Combination of top-down and bottom-up needs/wishes – regions, countries, EU funded trans-national initiatives, EU macro-regions, stakeholders, etc.
Across the actors of RIS3 : Universities (with EUA); Science parks (with JRC and IASP); SMEs (with UEAPME and EURADA); RTOs (with EARTO)
Across the RIS3 process : Entrepreneurial process of discovery; Governance; M&E; Priority setting; OP action plans; Co-ordination of national and regional level
Across regional features and aggregations : Macro-regional strategies (Danube; Baltic), Sparsely populated regions; Outermost regions; Rural areas
Across common RIS3 priorities : ICT/Digital growth; KETs (e.g. advanced manufacturing); Energy (e.g. fuel cells & hydrogen); Agro-food
Collaboration across borders
• Facilitating mutual learning and knowledge sharing
• Alignment of roadmaps
• Fostering alignment between European, national and regional innovation roadmaps
• Promoting synergies and co-investment opportunities (e.g. in the context of Horizon 2020 and the“stairway to excellence”)
• Support the creation of groupsaround common themes to workwith territorial co-operation strandof the EU cohesion policy
• A specific focus onEU macro-regional strategies
•
How can the S3 Platform assist in collaboration?
• Facilitate mutual learning – with aim to perform better at home
• Peer reviews
• Thematic events
• Training of experts/facilitators
• Nudging - top down allow for bottom up
• Initiation of collaboration
Connecting RIS3 in the BSR
• Support and follow collaborative processes
Danube Macro strategy
• Analysis
• Inter-regional collaboration in RIS3
• RIS3 guide
• KETs report
• Match making – bottom up identification
• Self-discovery
EYE@RIS3
Tool for Structural Regional Benchmarking
• Thematic events, e.g. Advanced Manufacturing, food
Eye@RIS3 – an online database for RIS3 priorities
• Enable Regions and Member States to position themselves,
• To find their unique niches
• To seek out potential partners for collaboration
• Categories are not perfect matches
• Approx 190 regions and more than 800 priorities
Specialisation fields are emerging that are related to:•Energy•Life science•ICT•Environment•Agro-food•Tourism
Specialisation fields are emerging that are related to:•Energy•Life science•ICT•Environment•Agro-food•Tourismhttp://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/map
Renewableenergy
Regions withcommon
prioritisedR&I
capabilities
Source: Eye@RIS3
Agrifood
Regions withcommon
target priorities
Source: Eye@RIS3
Aligning roadmaps
Across the EU around Europe2020 goals
(e.g. H2020 co-operation initiatives)
Between national and regional levels
(e.g. through RIS3)
Around networks, technologies, value chains
(e.g. Interreg IV C, H2020/ESIF mainstream)
Over physical and political borders
(e.g. Interreg, IPA CBC, EU macro-regions)
… making smart specialisation priorities "smarter"
Why is collaboration so important in RIS3?
• Your region or country a node in a global network!
• Globalised networks and economy calls for regional innovation policy • that goes beyond regional/national borders
• that takes into account the degree to which actors in a region are able to connect to and benefit from global innovation networks and value chains
• Collaboration increasingly necessaryto succeed in sustaining growth,jobs and welfare in Europe
• Place-based approach in S3to avoid fragmentation, but dependson connectedness in order to succeed
Key dimensions of collaboration
Why? What are the rationales for collaboration? How are these
rationales related to the smart specialisation agenda?
What? What are we collaborating on - common problems,
opportunities or learning?
Where &
with
whom?
What are the geographical boundaries of collaboration? Is
geographical proximity an important criteria ? What other types
of proximity are necessary?
Who are the partners and what are the criteria for choosing
them?
How? What is the intensity for the collaboration ? Is it a one-off or a
continuous engagement? What mechanism for collaboration are
being used? Do they align with the aims and objectives?
Source: Uyarra E, Sörvik J, Midtkandal I. S3 Working Paper Series No. 06/2014 .
Who to collaborate with and where to find them?
Small Large
Contiguous territories
Cross-border regionsExamples: Dutch-German-Belgian Top Technology Region TTR, the Centrope region at the intersection of Austria, Slovakia, Czech Republic and Hungary, and the Danish-Swedish Oresund region
Macro-regionsExample: Danube region, Baltic Sea region.
Non-contiguous territories
Interregional and inter-urban co-operationExample: “Four motors of Europe” network among the regions of Lombardy, Catalonia, Rhône-Alpes, Baden-Wurttemberg.
Peak associationsExamples: Assembly of European Regions, the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) and the Association of Regions of Traditional Industry.
Source OECD (2013), Cross border collaboration
Intensity of collaboration?
• Involve information sharing only, on e.g. innovation policy initiatives, research programmes, market intelligence, etc.
• Consist of concrete, ad hoc, projects, limited in time.
• Involve policy coordination, for instance aligning funding programme conditions and other conditions such as mobility incentives for researchers
• Jointly funded programmes or actions addressing common problems
• Adopt the form of joint strategies that are commonly designed, funded and implemented by the partner regions, and which inform a mix of policies and actions.
Ongoing …
• S3P ONLINE SURVEY on Examples of Successful Inter-regional and Trans-national R&I Partnerships:
• Following the bottom-up approach, we are looking for examples to set a base for shared learning and to facilitate better connectivity between the R&I partners in different countries and regions.
• This survey is intended to gather information on successful and sustainable R&I collaboration partnerships – between national and/or regional authorities managing R&I policies and EU structural funds, implementing agencies, innovation centres, technology parks, research institutions, cluster organisations, SME networks and other.
• Your proposals will serve for the establishment of a repository of cases which will then allow discussing practices applied in order to find possible supporting instruments and measures tackling the bottle-necks of trans-national R&I cooperation. The most inspiring and relevant examples will be selected by the S3 Platform to be presented at various upcoming events organised by the S3 Platform and collaborating partners.
Upcoming …
• WORKSHOP: CONNECTING RIS3
• IN THE BALTIC SEA REGION
• 9 DEC, VILNIUS, LITHUANIA •
• The workshop is organised jointly with the international innovation conference in Vilnius - Economy Transformation: Step into the Future.
• The workshop intends to give a frame for cooperation opportunities in the implementation of RIS3, with the objective to maximise the synergies between the RIS3s across the Baltic Sea Region. The workshop should be an arena to meet, network, and start or develop further collaboration within smart specialisation in the Baltic Sea Region.
• The workshop will build on the work already started in the event in Malmöin November 2013 – Get smarter together in the Baltic Sea Region.
