View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Long Range Planning: OTP Use Long Range Planning: OTP Use of Statewide Integrated Modelof Statewide Integrated Model
Becky Knudson
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Integrated Integrated AnalysisAnalysis
Integrated analysis blends the features of land use, transportation and economic activity together to represent the interactions and reveal net effects of change
POLICY
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Value of Integrated AnalysisValue of Integrated Analysis
• Helps identify factors relevant to policy issues
• Allows prospective policies to be tested
• Reveals policy trade-offs• Reveals synergies gained by
grouping policies
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
OTP Policy Analysis ProcessOTP Policy Analysis Process
Vision and Goals
Policies
Issues to be Addressed
Evaluation Framework(Performance Indicators)
Formulate ApproachAnalytical Tools • OR Statewide Model • OR Urban Models• Highway Economic
Requirements Systems
• MPO Data• Post Processing
Analysis
Questions to be Analyzed
OTP PoliciesInvestment Strategy
Final OTP
Steering Committee
Reviews Results
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Basic Evaluation ApproachBasic Evaluation Approach
• Identify performance criteria• Identify alternatives• Analyze how well each alternative
satisfies performance criteria• Judge the total effectiveness of
each alternative in meeting each performance criterion
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Example: Buying a Car Analyst Style
Performance Criteria
Model A Model B Model C
Price ++ +++ +MPG ++ +++ ++Reliability + - +++Comfort +++ ++ +Safety ++ + ++
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
New Car Evaluation Matrix
Performance Criteria
Model A Model B Model C
Price ++ +++ +MPG ++ +++ ++Reliability + - +++Comfort +++ ++ +Safety ++ + ++
10 8 9
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
New Car Evaluation Matrix
Performance Criteria
Model A Model B Model C
Price ++ +++ +MPG ++ +++ ++Reliability + - +++Comfort +++ ++ +Safety ++ + ++
11 7 12
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Evaluation Matrix for OTP Alternative Scenarios
Alternative Scenarios
Performance Criteria Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3
Accessibility/ Mobility
Economic Vitality
Efficiency & Cost Effectiveness
Equity
Reliability/ Responsiveness
Safety
Sustainability
Public Support/Financial Feasibility
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
OTP ScenariosOTP ScenariosReference Scenario
Sensitivity Scenario 1 High Fuel Prices
Sensitivity Scenario 2 Relaxed Land Use Controls
Alternate Scenario 1 Flat Revenue
Alternate Scenario 2 Max Operations & Maintenance
without Pricing
Alternate Scenario 3 Major Improvements
Alternate Scenario 4 Pricing
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
OTP Policy Analysis ProcessOTP Policy Analysis Process
Vision and Goals
Policies
Issues to be Addressed
Evaluation Framework(Performance Indicators)
Formulate ApproachAnalytical Tools • OR Statewide Model • OR Urban Models• Highway Economic
Requirements Systems
• MPO Data• Post Processing
Analysis
Questions to be Analyzed
OTP PoliciesInvestment Strategy
Final OTP
Steering Committee
Reviews Results
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
OTP Performance MeasuresProduced via R-code from model output? (red = to-be-done)
A. Accessibility/Mobility
1 Average annual recurring and non-recurring delay per capita (by region). avg delay Hh region, avg delay vehicle region
2 Average travel time per trip (peak, off-peak, by purpose, region, income class). avg ttime, avg distance
3
Number of jobs within 30 minutes of the average resident (by region, income class).
change in employment by industry by region w/in 30 min travel time
4
Variable passenger transportation user cost as percent of income (by region, income class).
passenger costs as percent of income by income and region
5 Percent of trips with viable transit, bicycle and walk options (by MPO region). F1
6 Average travel time to nearest major freight facility. The Travel Time to Freight Facilities for each region of origin(1 file per freight location)
B. Economic Vitality
1 Change in economic output between alternatives (by region, sector). gross state product
2 Change in employment between alternatives (by region, sector). emp by industry for state
3
Variable passenger transportation user cost as percent of income (by region, income class). A4
4
Variable freight transportation user cost as percent of economic output (by region, sector). C5
5 Number of workers within 30 minutes of the average job (by region). The change in house holds (workers) within 30 min for each region
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
R1
Scenarios
% D
iff fr
om B
ase
Yea
r (0
5')
a b c d
100
120
140
160
R2
Scenarios
% D
iff fr
om B
ase
Yea
r (0
5')
a b c d
100
120
140
160
R3
Scenarios
% D
iff fr
om B
ase
Yea
r (0
5')
a b c d
100
120
140
160
R4 & R5
Scenarios
% D
iff fr
om B
ase
Yea
r (0
5')
a b c d
100
120
140
160
State
Scenarios
% D
iff fr
om B
ase
Yea
r (0
5')
a b c d
100
120
140
160
Key
a = Reference Case
b = Flat Case
c = Operations Case
d = Major Improvments 1
Vechile Miles Traveled by Region of Origin for: Freight
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division
Transportation Planning Section, Transportation Development Division