Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Transport Theory for the Transport Theory for the
QuarkQuark--Gluon PlasmaGluon Plasma
V. GrecoV. Greco
UNIVERSITY of CATANIAUNIVERSITY of CATANIA
INFNINFN--LNSLNS
QuarkQuark--GluonGluon Plasma and Plasma and HeavyHeavy--IonIon CollisionsCollisions –– TurinTurin ((ItalyItaly), 7), 7--12 12 MarchMarch 2011 2011
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
x
yz
=∂
=∂
0)(
0)(
xj
xT
B
µµ
µνµ
HydrodynamicsHydrodynamicsNo microscopic descriptions
(mean free path λλλλ -> 0, ηηηη=0)
implying f=feq
+ EoS P(εεεε)
All the observables are in a way or the other
related with the evolution of the phase space
density :
What happens if we drop such assumptions?
There is a more “general” transport theory
valid also in non-equilibrium?
Is there any motivation to look for it?
pdxd
dNtpxf
33),,( =
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
PickingPickingPickingPickingPickingPickingPickingPicking--------up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC up four main results at RHIC
� Nearly Perfect FluidNearly Perfect Fluid,, Large Collective FlowsLarge Collective Flows:� Hydrodynamics good describes dN/dpT + v2(pT) with mass ordering
� BUT VISCOSITY EFFECTS SIGNIFICANT (finite λ and f ≠feq)
�� High OpacityHigh Opacity, , StrongStrong JetJet--quenchingquenching:� RAA(pT) <<1 flat in pT - Angular correlation triggered by jets pt<4 GeV
� STRONG BULK-JET TALK: Hydro+Jet model non applicable at pt<8-10 GeV
� HadronizationHadronization modifiedmodified, , CoalescenceCoalescence::� B/M anomalous ratio + v2(pT) quark number scaling (QNS)
� MICROSCOPIC MECHANISM RELEVANT
� Heavy quarks strongly interactingHeavy quarks strongly interacting:� small RAA large v2 (hard to get both) pQCD fails: large scattering rates
� NO FULL THERMALIZATION ->Transport Regime
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
BULK BULK
((ppTT~T)~T)
MINIJETS MINIJETS
((ppTT>>T,>>T,ΛΛQCDQCD))
CGC (x<<1)
Gluon saturationHeavyHeavy QuarksQuarks
(m(mqq>>T,>>T,ΛΛQCDQCD))
MicroscopicMicroscopic
MechanismMechanism
MattersMatters!!
Initial Conditions Quark-Gluon Plasma Hadronization
�� ppTT>> T , intermediate >> T , intermediate ppTT
�� m >> T , m >> T , heavyheavy quarksquarks
�� ηη/s >>0 , high /s >>0 , high viscosityviscosity
�� InitialInitial time time studiesstudies of of thermalizationsthermalizations
� Microscopic mechanism for HadronizationHadronization can modify QGP observable
� Non-equilibrium + microscopic scale are relevant in all the subfields
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Plan for the LecturesPlan for the Lectures
� Classical and Quantum Transport Theory
- Relation to Hydrodynamics and dissipative effects
- density matrix and Wigner Function
� Relativistic Quantum Transport Theory
- Derivation for NJL dynamics
- Application to HIC at RHIC and LHC
� Transport Theory for Heavy Quarks
- Specific features of Heavy Quarks
- Fokker-Planck Equation
- Application to c,b dynamics
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
),()(
),(),(
0
pxfp
xFxm
p
pxfpd
dp
xd
dx
d
pxdf
∂∂+
∂∂=
∂∂+
∂∂==
µµ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
µ
τττ
pdxd
dPptpxtxtprf
N
iii 33
1
33 ))(())((),,( =−−=∑=
δδrr
For a classical relativistic system of N particles
Gives the probability to find a particle in phase-space
pdxd
dPppxxpxf
N
iii 44
1
44 ))(())((),( =−−=∑=
τδτδ f(x,p) is a Lorentz scalar &
P0=(p2+m2)1/2
ClassicalClassical TransportTransport TheoryTheory
If one is interested to the collective behavior or to the behavior of a typical particle
knowledge of f(x,p) is equivalent to the full solution … to study the correlations
among particles one should go to f(x1,x2,p1,p2) and so on…
Liouville Theorem:
if there are only conservative forces -> phase-space density is a constant o motion
Force
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
),()(1
0),()( pxfxFpm
pxfp
xFxm
ppx
∂⋅+∂⋅==
∂∂+
∂∂
µµ
µ
µ
0=∇⋅+∇⋅+∂∂
fFfvt
fpr
rrrr
The non-relativistic reduction
Relativistic Vlasov Equation
Liouville -> Vlasov -> No dissipation
+
Collision= Boltzmann-VlasovDissipation
Entropy production
Allowing for scatterings
particles go in and out phase space
(d/dt) f(x,p)≠0
),]([),()(1
pxfCpxfxFpm px =
∂⋅+∂⋅
Collision term
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
The Collision Term
It can be derived formally from the reduction of the 2-body distribution
Function in the N-body BBGKY hierarchy.
The usual assumption in the most simple and used case:
1) Only two-body collisions
2) f(x1,x2,p1.p2)=f(x1,p1) f(x2,p2)
The collision term describe the change in f (x,p) because:
a) particle of momentum p scatter with p2 populating the phase space in (p’1,p’2)
),,(),,,( 21]2[
212123
13
23 ppxfppppwpdpdpdCloss ′′′′= ∫
probability finding
2 particles in p e p2
and space x
Probability to make
the transition
Sum over all the
momenta the kick-out
The particle in (x,p)
σdvpdpdw 1223
13)2112( =′′′′→
),,(),,,( 21]2[
212123
13
23 ppxfppppwpdpdpdCgain ′′′′′′= ∫
Collision Rate
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
In a more explicit form and covariant version:
gain
loss
At equilibrium in each phase-space region Cgain =Closs0)],([ 0 =pxfC
τ0][
fffC
−−≅vv
1 λρσ
τ == Relaxation time
time between 2 collisions
When one is close to equilibrium or when the λmfp is very small
One can linearize the collision integral in δf=f-f0 <<f
What is the f0(x,p)=0?
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
LocalLocal EquilibriumEquilibrium SolutionSolution
The necessary and sufficient condition to have C[f]=0 is
),(),(),(),( 2121 pxfpxfpxfpxf ′′=
[ ]),(),(),(),(),,,(][ 2121212123
13
23 pxfpxfpxfpxfppppwpdpdpdfC ′′−′′′′∝ ∫
Noticing that p1+p2=p’1+p’2 such a condition is satisfied by the relativistic
extension of the Boltzmann distribution:
[ ]µβ +⋅−= )(exp)( uppf juttner
It is an equilibrium solution also with LOCAL VALUES of T(x), u(x), m(x)
β=1/T temperature
u collective four velocity
µ chemical potential
The Vlasov part gives the constraint and the relation among T,u,µ locally
Main points:
• Boltzmann-Vlasov equation gives the right equilibrium distributions
• Close to equilibrium there can be many collisions with vanishing net effect
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Relation Relation toto HydrodynamicsHydrodynamics
=∂
=∂
0)(
0)(
xj
xTµ
µ
µνµ
Ideal Hydro
),(
),(
4
4
pxfpppdT
pxfppdj
νµµν
µµ
∫
∫=
=
∫∫∫ −−=
−−∂−=∂=∂ )()( 04044 ffpd
mffmfxmFpdfppdj p ττ
µµ
µµ
µµ
Inserting
Vlasov Eq.
Integral of a divergency
We can see that ideal Hydro can be satisfied only if f=feq , on the other hand
the underlying hypothesis of Hydro is that the mean free path is so small that
the f(x,p)is always at equilibrium during the evolution.
Similarly ∂µTµν , for f≠feq and one can do the expansion in terms of transport
coefficients: shear and bulk viscosity , heat conductivity [P. Romatschke]
At the same time f≠feq is associated to the entropy production ->
General definitions
Notice in Hydro appear only
p-integrated quantities
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
[ ]),(ln1),()( 4 pxfpxfppdxS −= ∫µµ
[ ]0
0444 ln)(...ln)()ln1(
f
fffpd
mffppdffppdS xx −==∂−=−∂−=∂ ∫∫∫ τµ
µµ
µµµ
0,0ln)1( ≥≥− xxx
Approach to thermal equlibrium is always associated to entropy production
EntropyEntropy Production <Production <--> > ThermalThermal EquilibriumEquilibrium
All these results are always valid and do not rely
on the relaxation time approx. more generally:
[ ] fffffCpdst
sS ln'2'12 −−=⋅∇+
∂∂=∂ ∫
rrµ
µ
∆S=0 <-> C[f]=0
Collision integral is associated to entropy production but if a local equilibrium
is reached there are many collisions without dissipations!
Boltzmann-Vlasov Eq.
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Does such an approach can make sense for a quantum system?
One can account also for the quantum effect of Pauli-Blocking
in the collision integral
)1)(1()1)(1( 212121212121 ffffffffffff ′−′−−−−′′→−′′
does not allow scattering if the final momenta have occupation number =1
-> Boltzmann-Nordheim Collision integral
This can appear quite simplistic, but notice that C[f]=0 now is
[ ]µβ +⋅−+=
)(exp1
1)(
uppfFD
So one gets the correct quantum equilbrium distribution, but what is
F(x,p) for a quantum system?
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Quantum Quantum TransportTransport TheoryTheoryIn quantum theory the evolution of a system can be described in terms of
the density matrix operator:
iii
iw ΨΨ=∑ρ̂ [ ]OtTrtO ˆ)()( ρ)=
2/ˆ2
),(~
yxxxAxedy
pxAipy
±== ±−+∫ h
hπ
[ ] dxdypxBpxABATr ∫∫= ),(~
),(~ˆˆ
For any operator one can define the Weyl transform of any operator:
which has the property
The Weyl transform of the density operator is called Wigner function
)()(2
ˆ2
),( −+∗−
−+
−ΨΨ== ∫∫ xxe
dyxxe
dypxf
ipyipy
Whh
hh πρ
π
[ ] ∫== dxdppxOpxfOTrO W ),(~
),(ˆρ̂fW plays in many respects
the same role of the distribution
function in statistical mechanics
and any expectation value
can be calculated as
and by (*)
(*)
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Properties of the Wigner Function
∫
∫=ΨΨ=
=ΨΨ=∗
∗
)()()(),(
)()()(),(
ppppxfdx
xxxpxfdp
W
W
ρ
ρ
[ ] ∫== dxdppxOpxfOTrO W ),(~
),(ˆρ̂
However for pure state fW can be negative so it cannot be a probability
On the other hand if we interpret its absolute value as a probabilty it does
not violate the uncertainty principle because one can show:
hπ1
),( ≤pxfW 1211
2
1 ≤∆∆≤∆⇒≤ pxNdxdp
dN ππππ hh
So if we go in a phase space smaller than
∆x∆p<h/2 one can never locate a particle
In agreement with the uncertainty principle
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Quantum Quantum TransportTransport EquationEquation
[ ]Ht
ˆ,ˆˆ ρρ =
∂∂ [ ] 0ˆ,ˆ
ˆ=−
∂∂
+− xHt
x ρρ0ˆ
2
ˆ,ˆ
ˆ
2
2
=
+−
∂∂
+−∫ xUm
p
txe
dy pyi
ρρπ
h
h
One can Wigner transform this or the Schr. Equation
After some calculations one gets the following equation
0),())((2)!12(
1
0
122
=∇⋅∇
++
∂∂+
∂∂
∑=
+
kw
kpx
k
WW pxfxUkx
f
m
p
t
f rsh
This exactly equivalent to the Equation for the denity matrix or the Schr. Eq.
NO APPROXIMATION but allows an approximation where h does not appear
explicitly and still accounting for quantum evolution when the gradient
of the potential are not too strong :
0=∇⋅∇+∂∂+
∂∂
wpxWW fUx
f
m
p
t
f rr
r
r This has the same form of the classical
transport equation, but it is for example
exact for an harmonic potential
See : W.B. Case, Am. J. Phys. 76 (2008) 937
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Quantum Quantum TransportTransport EquationEquation
[ ]Ht
ˆ,ˆˆ ρρ =
∂∂ [ ] 0ˆ,ˆ
ˆ=−
∂∂
+− xHt
x ρρ0ˆ
2
ˆ,ˆ
ˆ
2
2
=
+−
∂∂
+−∫ xUm
p
txe
dy pyi
ρρπ
h
h
One can Wigner transform this or the Schr. Equation
After some calculations one gets the following equation
0),())((2)!12(
1
0
122
=∇⋅∇
++
∂∂+
∂∂
∑=
+
kw
kpx
k
WW pxfxUkx
f
m
p
t
f rsh
This exactly equivalent to the Equation for the denity matrix or the Schr. Eq.
NO APPROXIMATION but allows an approximation where h does not appear
explicitly and still accounting for quantum evolution when the gradient
of the potential are not too strong :
0...),()(12
),()( 332
=+∇∇−∇∇ pxfxUpxfxU WpxWpx
h
0=∇⋅∇+∂∂+
∂∂
wpxWW fUx
f
m
p
t
f rr
r
r This has the same form of the classical
transport equation, but it is for example
exact for an harmonic potential
See : W.B. Case, Am. J. Phys. 76 (2008) 937
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
TransportTransport TheoryTheory in in FieldField TheoryTheory
One can extend the Wigner function (4x4 matrix):
2/,:)()(:)2(
),(4
4
yxxxxeyd
pxFpy
i±=ΨΨ= ±−+∫ αβαβ π
h
h
It can be decomposed in 16 indipendent components (Clifford Algebra)
µνµν
µµ
µµ σγγγγ TPVS FFiFFFF
2
1555 ++++=
For example the vector current
[ ] ),(4),( 44 pxFpdpxFTrpdj Vµµµµ γγ ∫∫ ==ΨΨ=
In a similar way to what done in Quantum mechanics
one can start from the Dirac equation for the fermionic field
[ ] 0)()()( =Ψ−−−∂ xgMVgi sV σγ µµµ[ ] 0)()(())(( =Ψ−−−∂ −−− xxgMxVgi sV αµµµ σγ [ ] 0)()(())(()(
)2( 4
4
=Ψ−−−∂Ψ∫ −−−+⋅ xxgMxVgixe
RdsV
Ripαµµ
µβ σγ
πSee : Vasak-Gyulassy- Elze, Ann. Phys. 173(1987) 462
Elze and Heinz, Phys. Rep. 183 (1989) 81
Blaizot and Iancu, Phys. Rep. 359 (2002) 355
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
TransportTransport TheoryTheory in in FieldField TheoryTheory
One can extend the Wigner function (4x4 matrix):
2/,:)()(:)2(
),(4
4
yxxxxeyd
pxFpy
i±=ΨΨ= ±−+∫ αβαβ π
h
h
It can be decomposed in 16 indipendent components (Clifford Algebra)
µνµν
µµ
µµ σγγγγ TPVS FFiFFFF
2
1555 ++++=
For example the vector current
[ ] ),(4),( 44 pxFpdpxFTrpdj Vµµµµ γγ ∫∫ ==ΨΨ=
In a similar way to what done in Quantum mechanics
one can start from the Dirac equation for the fermionic field
[ ] 0)()()( =Ψ−−−∂ xgMVgi sV σγ µµµ[ ] 0)()(())(( =Ψ−−−∂ −−− xxgMxVgi sV αµµµ σγ
See : Vasak-Gyulassy- Elze, Ann. Phys. 173(1987) 462
Elze and Heinz, Phys. Rep. 183 (1989) 81
Blaizot and Iancu, Phys. Rep. 359 (2002) 355
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Just for simplicity lets consider the case with only a scalar field
0:)(::)()(:)2(
),(2 4
4
=ΨΨ−
−∂⋅−⋅ −−+⋅−
∫ xxxeRd
pxFmi
p Rip σπ
γγ αβραβρ
For the NJL σ=G ΨΨ
...)(2
)()( +∂−≅− xR
xx xσσσ µ
µ This is the semiclassical approximation.
If one include higher order derivatives gets
an expansion in terms of higher order derivatives
of the field and of the Wigner function
1>>⋅ WF PX
The validity of such an expansion is based on the assumption ħ∂x∂pσ⋅FW >>1
Again the point is to have not too large gradients:
XF typical length scale of the field
PW typical momentum scale of the system
A very rough estimate for the QGP
XF ~ RN ~ 4-5 fm , PW ~ T ~ 1-3 fm-1 -> XF·PW ~ 5-15 >> 1
better for larger and hotter systems
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
0),()(2
)]([2
=
∂∂+−−⋅+∂⋅ pxFx
ixmp
iW
px µµσσγγ
Substituting the semiclassical approximation one gets:
There is a real and an imaginary part
{ } 0),(ˆ* =−⋅ pxFMp Wγ Which contains the
in medium mass-shell( ) 0),(
2*2 =− pxFMp S
Including more terms in the gradient expansion would have brougth terms
breaking the mass-shell constraint
[ ]{ } 0),(* =∂∂++∂ ∗∗∗∗∗ pxFmmFpp Spµ
µµννµ
µ
{ } 0),(ˆ)()( ** =∂∂+∂⋅ pxFxMxM Wpxµµγ µ
µγ VSW FFF +=
Decomposing, using both real and imaginary part and taking the trace
This substitute the force term mFµ(x) of classical transport
VlasovVlasov TransportTransport EquationEquation in QFTin QFT
Quantum effects encoded in the fields while f(x,p) evolution appears as the classical one.
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Transport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on latticeTransport solved on lattice
...22 +=∂ ↔Cfp µµ
Solved discretizing the space in (η, (η, (η, (η, x, y))))α α α α cells
See: Z. Xhu, C. Greiner, PRC71(04)
∆t→0
∆3x→0
exact
solution∆3x
Putting massless partons
at equilibrium in a box
than the collision rate is
Rate of collisions
per unit of phase
space
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Approaching equilibrium in a box
where the temperature is
Highly non-equilibrated distributions
F.Scardina
anisotropy in p-space
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Transport vs Viscous Hydrodynamics in 0+1D
λτ
λ→= L
K
s
TK
/5
1
ητ=
Knudsen number-1
000 2.14
2 τπηT
sK <⇒>
Huovinen and Molnar, PRC79(2009)
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Transport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport TheoryTransport Theory
� validvalid alsoalso at intermediate at intermediate ppTT out of out of equilibriumequilibrium::regionregion of of modifiedmodified hadronizationhadronization at RHICat RHIC
�� validvalid alsoalso at high at high ηη/s/s −−> > LHC and/or LHC and/or hadronichadronic phasephase
�� RelevantRelevant at LHC due at LHC due toto largelarge amountamount of minijet production of minijet production
�� Appropriate Appropriate forfor heavyheavy quark quark dynamicsdynamics
�� can can followfollow exoticexotic nonnon--equilibriumequilibrium phasephase CGC: CGC:
[ ]{ } ...),( 3222* ++=∂∂++∂ ↔↔
∗∗∗∗∗ CCpxfmmFpp pµ
µµννµ
µ
A unified framework against a separate modelling with
a wider range of validity in η, ζ,η, ζ,η, ζ,η, ζ, pT + microscopic level.
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Applications of transport approach
to the QGP Physics
- Collective flows & shear viscosity
- dynamics of Heavy Quarks & Quarkonia
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
=∂
=∂
0)(
0)(
xj
xT
B
µµ
µνµ
HydrodynamicsHydrodynamicsNo microscopic details
(mean free path λ -> 0, η=0)
+ EoS P(εεεε)
PartonParton cascadecascade
v2 saturation pattern reproduced
First stage of RHICFirst stage of RHIC
22↔=∂ Cfp µµ
Parton elastic 2→2 interactions
(λ=1/σρ - P=ε/3)
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Information from nonInformation from non--equilibrium: Elliptic Flowequilibrium: Elliptic Flow
xy z
px
py
22
22
xy
xyx +
−=ε
cc22ss==dPdP/d/dεε
v2/ε measures the efficiencyof the convertion of the anisotropy
from CoordinateCoordinate to
MomentumMomentum spacespace
[ ]...)2cos(v21 2 ++= ϕϕ TT dp
dN
ddp
dNFourier expansion in p-space
| | | | | | | | EoSEoS
Massless gas ε=3P -> c2s=1/3
Bhalerao et al., PLB627(2005)
2v2/ε
time
c2s= 0.6
c2s= 0.1
MeasureMeasure of of
P P gradientsgradients
Hydrodynamics
λ=0
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Information from nonInformation from non--equilibrium: Elliptic Flowequilibrium: Elliptic Flow
xy z
px
py
22
22
xy
xyx +
−=ε
cc22ss==dPdP/d/dεε
λ=λ=λ=λ=λ=λ=λ=λ=(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)(σρ)−−−−−−−−1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
v2/ε measures the efficiencyof the convertion of the anisotropy
from CoordinateCoordinate to
MomentumMomentum spacespace
[ ]...)2cos(v21 2 ++= ϕϕ TT dp
dN
ddp
dNFourier expansion in p-space
|| viscosityviscosity
| | | | | | | | EoSEoS
Massless gas ε=3P -> c2s=1/3
Bhalerao et al., PLB627(2005)
More generally one can distinguish:
--Short Short rangerange: : collisionscollisions --> > viscosityviscosity
--Long Long rangerange: : fieldfield interactioninteraction --> > ε ε ≠≠ 3P3P
D. Molnar & M. Gyulassy, NPA 697 (02)
2v2/ε
time
c2s= 0.6
c2s= 0.1
MeasureMeasure of of
P P gradientsgradients
Hydrodynamics
λ=0
c2s= 1/3
Parton Cascade
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
If v2 is very large
To balance the minimum vv44 >0 require>0 require
v4 ~ 4% if v2= 20%
222
4224
4 )(
6)4cos(
yx
yyxx
pp
ppppv
++−
== ϕ
At RHIC a finite vAt RHIC a finite v44 observedobservedforfor the first time !the first time !
More harmonics needed to describean elliptic deformation -> v4
P. KolbPD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Viscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglectedViscosity cannot be neglected
but itit violatesviolates causalitycausality, ,
IIII00 orderorder expansionexpansion neededneeded --> > IsraelIsrael--StewartStewart
tensortensor basedbased on on entropyentropy increaseincrease ∂∂µ µ ssµµ >0>0
P. Romatschke, PRL99 (07)
y
v
A
F x
yz
x
∂∂−= η
µνµνµνdissipidealTT Π+=
Relativistic Navier-Stokes
τη,τζ two parameters appears +
δf ~ feq reduce the pT validity range
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Transport approachTransport approachTransport approachTransport approachTransport approachTransport approachTransport approachTransport approach
[ ]{ } ...),( 3222* ++=∂∂++∂ ↔↔
∗∗∗∗∗ CCpxfmmFpp pµ
µµννµ
µ
CollisionsCollisions --> > ηη≠≠00Field Interaction -> ε≠3PFree streaming
C23 better not to show…
Discriminate short and long range interaction:
Collisions (λ≠0) + Medium Interaction ( Ex. Chiral symmetry breaking)
ρ,Τ
decrease
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
WeWe simulate a simulate a constantconstant shearshear viscosityviscosity
( ) sTn
pTr trtr /
1
415
4)),(( , ηµ
σρσα
αα −
==r
α=cell index in the r-space
Neglecting µ and inserting in (*)
πη
4
1=s
32
45
24 T
g
T
Pns
πε =+=≈
2
1
Ttr ≈σ At T=200 At T=200 MeVMeV
σσtrtr∼∼10 10 mbmb
TimeTime--Space Space dependentdependent cross cross
sectionsection evaluatedevaluated locallylocally
V. Greco at al., PPNP 62 (09)
G. Ferini et al., PLB670 (09)
(*)cost.)4(15
4 =−
=Tn
p
s tr µσηRelativistic Kinetic theory Cascade code
The viscosity is kept
constant varying σ
A A roughrough estimate of estimate of σσ(T) (T)
α=cell index in the r-space
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
a) collisions switched off
for ε<εc=0.7 GeV/fm3
b) b) ηη/s /s increasesincreases in the crossin the cross--over over regionregion, , fakingfaking the the smoothsmoothtransitiontransition betweenbetween the QGP and the QGP and the the hadronichadronic phasephase
TwoTwoTwoTwoTwoTwoTwoTwo kinetickinetickinetickinetickinetickinetickinetickinetic freezefreezefreezefreezefreezefreezefreezefreeze--------outoutoutoutoutoutoutout schemeschemeschemeschemeschemeschemeschemescheme
Finite lifetime for the QGP small η/s fluid!
At 4πη/s ~ 8 viscous hydrodynamics is not applicable!
No f.o.
sn
ptr /
1
15
1
ησ =
This gives also automatically
a kind of core-corona effect
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
� 4πη/s >3 → too low v2(pT) at pT≥1.5 GeV/c even with coalescence
� 4πη/s =1 not small enough to get the large v2(pT) at pT≥2 GeV/c without coalescence
Agreement with Hydro at low pT
Parton Cascade at fixed shear viscosity
Role of ReCo for ηηηη/s estimate
HadronicHadronic ηη/s /s includedincluded
−−>> shapeshape forfor vv22((ppTT) )
consistentconsistent withwith thatthat neededneeded
byby coalescencecoalescence
A quantitative estimate needs
an EoS with ε≠ 3P :
cs2(T) < 1/3 -> v2 suppression ~~ 30%
-> ηηηη/s ~ 0.1 may be in agreement ~ 0.1 may be in agreement
with coalescencewith coalescence
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Short Reminder from coalescenceShort Reminder from coalescence……
Quark Number ScalingQuark Number Scaling
n
p
nT
2V1
Molnar and Voloshin, PRL91 (03)Greco-Ko-Levai, PRC68 (03)Fries-Nonaka-Muller-Bass, PRC68(03)
2
22)2()(
T
T
q
T
T
M ppd
dNαp
pd
dN
3
22)3()(
T
T
q
T
T
B ppd
dNp
pd
dN α
[ ])2cos(v21φ
2q ϕ+=TT
q
TT
q
dpp
dN
ddpp
dN
IsIs itit reasonablereasonable the vthe v2q 2q ~0.08~0.08
neededneeded byby
CoalescenceCoalescence scalingscaling ??
IsIs itit compatiblecompatible withwith a a fluidfluid
ηη/s /s ~ 0.1~ 0.1--0.20.2 ? ?
I° Hot Quark
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
EffectEffect of of ηηηηηηηη/s of the /s of the hadronichadronic phasephase
Hydro evolution at ηηηη/s(QGP) down to thermal f.o. −−−−>>>> ~50%Error in the evaluation of h/s
Uncertain hadronic ηηηη/s
is less relevant
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
EffectEffect of of ηηηηηηηη/s of the /s of the hadronichadronic phasephase at LHCat LHC
RHIC – 4πηπηπηπη/s=1 + f.o.
RHIC – 4πηπηπηπη/s=2 +No f.o.
Suppression of v2 respect the ideal 4πηπηπηπη/s=1
LHC – 4πηπηπηπη/s=1 + f.o.
At LHC the contamination of mixed and hadronic phase becomes negligible
Longer lifetime of QGP -> v2 completely developed in the QGP phase
S. Plumari, Scardina, Greco in preparation
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Impact of the Impact of the MeanMean FieldField and/or and/or
of the of the ChiralChiral phasephase transitiontransition
- Cascade −> Boltzmann-Vlasov Transport
- Impact of an NJL mean field dynamics
- Toward a transport calculation with a lQCD-EoS
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
NJL NJL MeanMean FieldField
TwoTwo effectseffects::
−− εε ≠≠ 3p no 3p no longerlonger a a masslessmassless freefree gas, gas, ccss <1/3<1/3
−− ChiralChiral phasephase transitiontransition
[ ])()(1)2(
)(4)(3
3
TfTfE
pdTMNgNmTM
pcf
+−
Λ
−−+= ∫ πAssociated
Gap Equation
free gas scalar field interaction
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
NJL NJL MeanMean FieldField
TwoTwo effectseffects::
−− εε ≠≠ 3p no 3p no longerlonger a a masslessmassless freefree gas, gas, ccss <1/3<1/3
−− ChiralChiral phasephase transitiontransition
[ ])()(1)2(
)(4)(3
3
TfTfE
pdTMNgNmTM
pcf
+−
Λ
−−+= ∫ πAssociated
Gap Equation
free gas scalar field interaction
Fodo
r, JE
TP(2
006)NJL
gas
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
BoltzmannBoltzmann--VlasovVlasov equationequation forfor the NJLthe NJL
Contribution of the NJL mean fieldContribution of the NJL mean field
NumericalNumerical solutionsolution withwith δδ--functionfunction test test particlesparticles
Test in a Box Test in a Box withwith equilibriumequilibrium ff distributiondistribution
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
SimulatingSimulating a a constantconstant ηη/s /s withwith a NJL a NJL meanmean fieldfield
npτη15
4=
Massive gas in relaxation time approximation
The viscosity is kept modifying
locally the cross-section
α=cell index in the r-spaceM=0
TheoryCode
σ =10 mb
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Au+Au @ 200 AGeV for central collision, b=0 fm.Au+Au @ 200 AGeV for central collision, b=0 fm.
DynamicalDynamical evolutionevolution withwith NJLNJL
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Does the NJL chiral phase transition affectthe elliptic flow of a fluid at fixed ηηηη/s?
S. Plumari et al., PLB689(2010)
-- NJL NJL meanmean fieldfield reduce the vreduce the v22 : : attractiveattractive fieldfield
-- IfIf ηη/s /s isis fixedfixed effecteffect of NJL of NJL compensatedcompensated byby cross cross sectionsection increaseincrease
-- vv22 <<−−>> ηη/s /s notnot modifiedmodified byby NJL NJL meanmean fieldfield dynamicsdynamics!!
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
NextNext stepstep -- useuse a a quasiparticlequasiparticle modelmodel
withwith a a realisticrealistic EoSEoS [[vvss(T)](T)]
forfor a quantitative estimate of a quantitative estimate of ηηηηηηηη/s /s toto compare compare withwith HydroHydro……
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
WB=0 guarantees
Thermodynamicaly consistency
UsingUsing the the QPQP--modelmodel
U.Heinz and P. Levai, PRC (1998)
M(T), B(T) fitted to lQCD [A. Bazavov et al. 0903.4379 ]data on ε and P
NJL
QP
lQC
D-F
odor
° A. Bazavov et al. 0903.4379 hep-lat
ε
P
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
TransportTransport approachapproach can can pavepave the way the way forfor a a consistencyconsistency
amongamong knownknown vv2,42,4 propertiesproperties::
� breaking of v2(pT)/εεεε & persistence of v2(pT)/<v2> scaling
�� vv22(p(pTT), v), v44(p(pTT) at ) at ηηηηηηηη/s~0.1/s~0.1--0.2 can agree with what needed 0.2 can agree with what needed
by coalescence by coalescence (QNS)(QNS)
�� NJL NJL chiralchiral phase transition do not modify vphase transition do not modify v22 <<<<<<<<−−−−−−−−>>>>>>>> ηηηηηηηη/s/s
� Signature of ηηηη/s(T): large v4/(v2)2
Summary for Summary for ligthligth QGPQGP
NextNext StepsSteps forfor a quantitative estimate:a quantitative estimate:
� Include the effect of an EoS fitted to lQCD
� Implement a Coalescence + Fragmentation mechanism
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
2Tf
* vm2
1TT +≈
=∂
=∂
0)(
0)(
xj
xT
B
µµ
µνµ
A Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect FluidA Nearly Perfect Fluid
*),( T
m
T
upE
eq
T
egegpxf−−⋅−−
⋅=⋅=µγ rr
TTff ~ 120 ~ 120 MeVMeV
<<ββTT> ~ 0.5 > ~ 0.5
ForFor the first time the first time veryvery closeclose
toto ideal ideal HydrodynamicsHydrodynamics
Finite viscosity is not negligible
No microscopic description (λ->0)� Blue shift of dN/dpT hadron spectra
� Large v2/ε� Mass ordering of v2(pT)
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Jet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet QuenchingJet Quenching
Nuclear Modification FactorNuclear Modification Factor
How much modification respect to pp?
�� Jet gluon radiation observedJet gluon radiation observed:
� all hadrons RAA <<1 and flat in pT� photons not quenched -> suppression due to QCD
away
near
Medium
Jet triggered angular Jet triggered angular correlcorrel..
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Surprises…
In vacuum p/π ~ 0.3 due to Jet fragmentation
HadronizationHadronization has been modifiedhas been modifiedppTT < 4< 4--6GeV !?6GeV !?
PHENIX, PRL89(2003)
Baryon/MesonsBaryon/Mesons
Protons not suppressed
QuenchingQuenching
Au+Au
p+p
� Jet quenching should affect both
π0 suppression: evidence of jetquenching before fragmentation
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Hadronization in Heavy-Ion Collisions
�Initial state: no partons in the vacuum but a
thermal ensemble of partons -> Use in mediumUse in medium quarks
�No direct QCD factorization scale for the bulk:
dynamics much less violent (t ~ 4 fm/c)
Parton spectrum
H
Baryon
Meson
Coal.
Fragmentation
V. Greco et al./ R.J. Fries et al., PRL 90(2003)
Fragmentation:� energy needed to create quarks from vacuum� hadrons from higher pT
� partons are already there$ to be close in phase space $
� ph= n pT ,, n = 2 , 3baryons from lower momenta (denser)
Coalescence:
ReCoReCo pushespushes out soft out soft physicsphysics byby factorsfactors x2 and x3 !x2 and x3 !
More easy to More easy to produce baryons!produce baryons!
∫∫Σ
→Σ
⊗+Φ⊗⊗= HqqMqqH Dfff
Pd
Nd3
3
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
HadronizationHadronizationHadronizationHadronizationHadronizationHadronizationHadronizationHadronization ModifiedModifiedModifiedModifiedModifiedModifiedModifiedModified
Baryon/MesonsBaryon/Mesons
Au+Au
p+p
PHENIX, PRL89(2003)
Quark Quark numbernumber scalingscaling
n
TT
qT
T
H nppd
dNp
pd
dN
∝ )()(
22
n
p
nT
2V1
Dynamical quarks are visibleDynamical quarks are visible
Collective flowsCollective flows
[ ])2cos(v21φ
2 ϕ+=TT
q
TT
q
dpp
dN
ddpp
dN
/3)(p3v)(pv
/2)(p2v)(pv
Tq2,TB2,
Tq2,TM2,
≈
≈Enhancement of vEnhancement of v22
v2q fitted from v2π
GKL
Coalescence scalingCoalescence scaling
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com
Heavy QuarksHeavy Quarks
−− mmc,bc,b >> >> ΛΛQCDQCD produced by pQCD processes (out of equilibrium)
−− ττeqeq > > ττQGPQGP with standard pQCD cross section (and also with
non standard non standard pQCDpQCD))
Hydrodynamics does not apply to heavy quark dynamics (f≠feq)
pQCD
“D”QGP- RHIC
Equilibration timeEquilibration timeEquilibration timeEquilibration time
npQCD
PD
F C
reated with deskP
DF
PD
F W
riter - Trial :: http://w
ww
.docudesk.com