Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    1/6

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228645799

    Transport in Highly Heterogeneous PorousMedia: From Direct Simulation to Macro-Scale

    Two-Equation Models or Mixed Models

     ARTICLE  in  CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING · JUNE 2008

    DOI: 10.2202/1934-2659.1130

    CITATIONS

    7

    READS

    48

    2 AUTHORS:

    Debenest Gerald

    Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulo…

    114 PUBLICATIONS  355 CITATIONS 

    SEE PROFILE

    Michel Quintard

    Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulo…

    564 PUBLICATIONS  4,393 CITATIONS 

    SEE PROFILE

    Available from: Michel Quintard

    Retrieved on: 17 March 2016

    https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_1https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel_Quintard?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_7https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Institut_de_Mecanique_des_Fluides_de_Toulouse?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_6https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel_Quintard?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michel_Quintard?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debenest_Gerald?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_7https://www.researchgate.net/institution/Institut_de_Mecanique_des_Fluides_de_Toulouse?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_6https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debenest_Gerald?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_5https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debenest_Gerald?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_4https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228645799_Transport_in_Highly_Heterogeneous_Porous_Media_From_Direct_Simulation_to_Macro-Scale_Two-Equation_Models_or_Mixed_Models?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_3https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228645799_Transport_in_Highly_Heterogeneous_Porous_Media_From_Direct_Simulation_to_Macro-Scale_Two-Equation_Models_or_Mixed_Models?enrichId=rgreq-dfb00943-29c7-481c-b2fd-3c157b27a3d7&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODY0NTc5OTtBUzoxMDIzNjMxNDI1NTc3MDhAMTQwMTQxNjY4MzcyMA%3D%3D&el=1_x_2

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    2/6

    Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media: From Direct

    Simulation to Macro-Scale Two-Equation Models or Mixed Models

    G. Debenest1 and M. Quintard

    *,1 

    1 Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse*Corresponding author: Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse, 4 allée C. Soula, 31400 Toulouse

    ([email protected])

    Abstract: Flows in highly heterogeneous mediaare found in many practical fields, such as

    hydrology, petroleum engineering, chemical

    engineering. The case of two-region

    heterogeneous media (fractured media, catalytic

     beds, etc.) plays a fundamental role. The

    different questions associated to this specificcase are illustrated in this paper for two different

    kinds of transport: (i) flow of a slightly

    compressible fluid, (ii) dispersion of a tracer.

    Many different theoretical models are

    implemented under COMSOL, using many of

    the original features of the software. These

    models correspond to direct simulation and

    macro-scale or large-scale models such as fully

    averaged models or mixed models.

    Keywords:  porous media, heterogeneous

    system, double-porosity, mixed models

    1. Introduction

    Flow in highly heterogeneous media have

    received a considerable interest in the scientific

    literature since all natural media, such as the one

    appearing in petroleum reservoir engineering or

    hydrogeology, features more or less importantheterogeneity. Heterogeneity is known to lead to

    abnormal transport mechanisms. Here, the word

    abnormal   means that classical convection-

    dispersion equations cannot be used reliably [1].

    A particular class of heterogeneous systems

    shows easily this abnormal behavior: two-region

    systems, often called also double-porosity

    systems. Examples of such systems are given in

    Fig. 1. The left picture corresponds to a fractured

    system in which the ω-region permeability isseveral orders of magnitude lower than the

     permeability of the η-region. Advection is themajor transport mechanisms in the fractures,

    while diffusion is dominant in the matrix blocks.

    These systems are also called immobile-mobile

    systems. If the ratio of permeability is closer

    than 1, some advection may occur also through

    the ω-region, and the resulting systems are calledmobile-mobile system.Of course, the Darcy-scale equations relevant to

    macro-scale description may be solved directly

    to capture the transport phenomena within such

    systems. This poses specific numerical problems

    especially in the case of fracture systems forwhich the volume fraction of the η-region,

    denoted φ η , is small. The major problem,however, for real-scale applications, is that direct

    simulation is limited to a small number of matrix blocks and fractures.

    ω

    η

     

    Figure 1. Example of double-porosity systems

    Alternative models must be sought, which can be

    divided into two different classes. The first class

    corresponds to fully averaged models, or two-

    equation models. Transport equations in both

    regions are homogenized over a representative

    volume of the heterogeneous system [2]. Hence,

    the numerical model requires only two large-

    scale grids, for each homogenized region, whichis efficient in terms of computation. An

    exchange term must be implemented to connect

    the two sets of large-scale equations. One

    understands that this single exchange terms may

    have difficulties in representing all the detailed

     behavior associated to the exchange between the

    fractures and the many blocks within a numerical

    cell. If one wants to keep some of these details,

    an alternative model, called mixed model, may

     be used. It is based on a fully averaged equation

    associated to the η-region, coupled to a smaller-scale model with the original equations (hence

    Debenest, G. and Quintard, M., 2006. Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media:

    From Direct Simulation to Macro-Scale Two-Equation Models or Mixed Models, COMSOL

    2006. COMSOL, Paris, pp. 1-5.

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    3/6

    the name mixed model). Those different

    strategies are schematically represented in Fig. 2.

    {{

    {

    Direct model

    Two-equation model

    Mixed model

     Figure 2. Schematic representation of the threedifferent models

    The resulting PDEs have many different and

    interesting features that may be solved nicely

    using the different approaches offered in

    COMSOL. This is illustrated in this paper.

    2. Direct simulation

    The problems posed by direct simulations are

    two folds: (i) high contrast of properties, (ii)

    small volume fraction of one of the region in the

    case of fractured media. If one considers, for

    instance, the flow of a slightly compressible fluid

    over the system represented Fig. 3, the equationsto be solved are:

    1 P c P 

     βη 

    η βη βη  

     β 

    ∂ 

    ∂ µ 

    = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇

    K   (1)

    and a similar equation in the other region, with

    continuity of flux and pressure over all interfaces

     between matrix blocks and fractures. This

    transport equation for the fractures can easily be

    transformed into a PDE over a fracture seen as a

    line (in 2D) or plane (in 3D), we have

    exchange with surroundingmatrix blocks

    1

    1  .

     f f 

     P 

    h c h P  t 

     P 

     βη 

    η βη βη   β 

    ηω βω βω  

     β 

    ∂ 

    ∂ µ 

     µ 

    = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇

    + ⋅∇n

    K

    K(2)

    where derivatives are taken along the fractures.

    This can be solved nicely in COMSOL using the

    application mode “Weak Form, Boundary”  (see

    for instance the application to adsorption

     problems in COMSOL manuals). An example of

    the obtained pressure field at a given time is

    shown Fig. 4.

    Figure 3. Simulation over a fractured system. 

    Figure 4. Pressure field (a well is located at the

    center)

    In this paper, we consider the flow of one phase

    together with the dispersion of a tracer. For now

    on we focus on the tracer dispersion problem, i.e.

    Darcy-scale equations of the type

    ( )*t

    C  C  C η 

    η η η η η   η ε ε ∂ + ⋅ ∇ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅∇

    ∂V D   (3)

    The velocity field, Vη, will be computedindependently from Darcy’s law.

    As an illustration, we will consider the system

    represented Fig. 5 (after [3]). Low permeability

    nodules are scattered through a highly permeable

    medium. The direct dispersion problem is solved

    and the concentration field at a given time is

    represented Fig. 5. The necessary PDEs are

    directly available in COMSOL.

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    4/6

     

    We now discuss the two different large-scale

    models that may be associated to this system,i.e., the two-equation model and the mixed

    model.

    Figure 5. Concentration field at t =10000s field(injection from the left, initial zero concentration)

    3. Two-equation model 

    The two-equation dispersion model is

    characterized by the following equations [2]

    ( )

    ( )

    *

    * * ** *

    * **

    *

    * * ** *

    * **

    t

      ...

    t

      ...

    C C C 

    C C 

    C C C 

    C C 

    η 

    η η η η ηη η  

    η ω 

    ω 

    ω ω ω ω ωω ω  

    η ω 

    ε ϕ 

    α 

    ε ϕ 

    α 

    ∂ + ⋅ ∇ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇ ∂

    − +−

    ∂ + ⋅ ∇ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇ ∂

    + +−

    V D

    V D

     (4)

    in which the concentrations are those of a

    representative volume of the heterogeneous

    system. In the case of the problem represented

    Fig. 5, the large-scale equations may be solved in

    1D, i.e., the Darcy-scale 2D problem is replaced

    at the large-scale by two 1D equations. These

    equations can be solved easily in COMSOL.

    A more interesting aspect for COMSOL

    application is the calculation of the effective properties in Eq. (4) from a representative Unit

    Cell of the porous medium. The PDEs to be

    solved are given in the Appendix. In particular,

    the mass exchange coefficient, α *, in Eqs. (4)requires the solving of an integro-differential

    system for a r -field, which in facts links the

    concentration deviation to the difference in the

    large-scale concentrations, i.e., ( )* *C C η ω − .This is beyond the scope of this paper to give

    theoretical details, and we refer the reader to [2]

    for a complete explanation. Two computational

    difficulties can be found in these problems: (i)

    the use of periodicity boundary conditions, (ii)

    the existence of an integral involving the

    solution as a source term (the term α *). Thosetwo features are directly available from

    COMSOL! Figs. 6 and 7 show an example of

    solution (the unit cell is simply a single nodule

    within the η-region) in the case of a diffusiveregime or a more convective regime.

    Figure 6. r-field (diffusive regime)

    Figure 7. r-field (convective regime)

    4. Mixed model

    The equations for the mixed model are the

    following. The transport equation in the η-regionis homogenized, we have

    ( ) ( )*

    * * ** *

    *

    exchange with ω

    1  .

     A

    C C C 

    C dAV 

    ωη 

    η 

    η η η η η η η η  

    ηω ω ω ω  

    ϕ ε ϕ ε  

    ε ∞

    ∂+ ∇ ⋅ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇

    + ⋅ ∇∫

    V D

    n D

    (5)

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    5/6

    where we need to compute the flux exchanged

    with the embedded nodules. For our particular

    application, this equation will be solved in 1D.The exchanged flux will be calculated by solving

    several independent Darcy-scale problems over

    several nodules. These problems are given by

    ( )*t

    C C ω ω ω ω ω  ε ε 

    ∂= ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇

    ∂D   (6)

    within each nodule, and a mixed boundary

    condition

     

    *

    Darcy-scalelarge-scale

      atC C Aη ω ωη  =   (7)

    which connects the (here) 2D Darcy-scale

     problem to the 1D large-scale problem.

    Solution is carried out in the following manner,using the multi-domain feature of COMSOL,

    and the possibility to exchange information

     between the two domains. Eq. (5) is

    implemented in a 1D domain, with source terms

    coming from the flux calculation at the nodule

     boundaries and Eqs. (6) and (7) are solved other

    10 nodules, as shown in Fig. 8. The arrows

    illustrate the links between the two domains.

    Figure 8. The two-domain representation of the mixedmodel.

    Fig. 9 shows the 1D concentration field for the

    η-region, and the concentration fields within thenodules, at a given time.

    Figure 9. One example of mixed model concentrationfields.

    Finally, it is interesting for the physicist to

    compare the results obtained from the different

    models. As an example, we will consider thetime evolution of the exit concentration, as

    shown in Fig. 10.

    0.001

    0.101

    0.201

    0.301

    0.401

    0.501

    0.601

    0.701

    0.801

    0.901

    1 201 401 601 801

    time (minutes)

          C     o     n     c     e     n      t     r     a      t      i     o     n

    direct model

    two-equationmodel

    mixed model

     Figure 10. Exit concentration versus time for the

    different models.

    We see that the slightly more complex mixed

    models offer a better representation than the two-

    equation model. In terms of computational

    resources, of course, the direct computation is

    very heavy, the mixed model still requires 2D or

    3D calculations, while the two-equation model

    does not require detailed Darcy-scale

    simulations. The choice between the different

     possibilities will be made depending on the

    required accuracy, and the computational

    requirements.

    7. Conclusions

    In this paper, we have provided an example

    of the use of COMSOL for a comprehensive

    analysis of transport through two-region

    heterogeneous porous systems. Many questions

    are raised from a physicist point of view when

    considering these problems. In particular, which

    large-scale models may be used to avoid a heavy

    direct computation of the Darcy-scale equations?Answering these questions requires a thorough

    theoretical analysis. The analysis leads to several

    sets of PDEs, which have many peculiarities

    which are often a problem in terms of

    computational implementation: integro-differential equations, periodicity conditions,

    coupling between domains of different

    dimensions, …

    It is remarkable that all these difficulties

    were solved readily with COMSOL through the

  • 8/15/2019 Transport in Highly Heterogeneous Porous Media-From Direct Simulation to Macroscale Two Equation or Mixed Model

    6/6

    available tools, without the need of special

    developments.

    8. References

    1. Cushman, J.H. and Ginn, T.R., 1993. Nonlocal

    Dispersion in Media with Continuously Evolving

    Scales of Heterogeneity. Transport in Porous

     Media, 13: 123-138.

    2. Cherblanc, F., Ahmadi, A. and Quintard, M.,2003. Two-medium description of dispersion in

    heterogeneous porous media: Calculation of

    macroscopic properties. Water Resources Res.,

    39(6): SBH 6-1:6-20.3. Zinn, B. et al., 2004. Experimental

    visualization of solute transport and mass

    transfer processes in two-dimensional

    conductivity fields with connected regions of

    high conductivity.  Environ Sci Technol., 38(14):

    3916-3926.

    9. Acknowledgements

    This work has received partial support from

    INSU/CNRS, and Institut Français du Pétrole.

    10. Appendix

    The “closure problem” ([2]) to be solved inorder to calculate the effective properties of

    the two-equation model is given for two

    unknown fields r η  and r ω  by

    ( )   ( ) 1 *r r η η η η η  ϕ α ∗ −∇ ⋅ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇ −V D  

    r r at Aη ω ηω= + 1 ,  

    atr r Aηω η η ηω ω ω ηω  ∗ ∗⋅ ⋅ ∇ = ⋅ ⋅∇n D n D  

    ( )   ( )1r r ω ω ω ω ω  ϕ α ∗ − ∗∇ ⋅ = ∇ ⋅ ⋅ ∇ +V D  

    Periodicity:

     

    ( ) ( ) , ( ) ( ) , 1, 2, 3i ir r r r iη η ω ω  + = + = =r r r rℓ ℓ

    r r ηη

    ωω

    n s   l q= =0 0,  

    where

    ( )* *1

     A

    r r dA

    V  ωη ηω η η η η  α 

    = − ⋅ − ⋅∇∫ n V D  

    Similar problems are available to calculate the

    large-scale dispersion tensors.