Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fenelon 1
Transit Terrors: An Ethnographic Study Based on Commuters Traveling
from New Jersey to New York
Alyson Fenelon Professor Chrysafi
ENG 201-01 21 November 2018
Fenelon 2
Introduction
Millions of Americans, 100 million
to be more precise, commute to work on a
daily basis (Evans and Wener, “Rail
Commuting Duration and Passenger Stress”
408), whether their form of transportation is
a private or public entity. This substantial
portion of the population are a part of an
interesting subculture of society. The
purpose of this ethnography is to observe the
behavior of those who commute by train and
try to identify why this mode of commuting
adds an extra level of stress to their lives.
As a resident of New Jersey and a
college student in Manhattan, I understand
the commuting process well; being squeezed
between a sneezy woman and a sweaty man
while lacking something to hold onto as the
train shifts and sways down the tracks is
always a pleasure after an eleven-hour day
at school. As most people know, residents of
New York and New Jersey are not the nicest
people. This adds an element of uncertainty
while everyone is pushing and shoving one
another for a spot to be a sardine in the
already too crowded train cars. This reality
is most prevalent during the rush hours of
the day: between 6am-9am and 5pm-8pm.
To most people, going home after a
long day is so desperately needed that they
will do anything to ensure that they arrive
home as quickly as possible. One
unfortunate reality of commuting is that one
cannot necessarily control their commute.
Everything they do relies on the efficiency
of the trains, which from my experience, is
not reliable on most days. If the company on
these trains is not enjoyable and there is no
certainty that you will reach your destination
on time, it begs the question: Why do people
choose to commute? Why do people cram
onto overcrowded trains when they could be
in the comfort of their own vehicles? Why is
stress added to the lives of these individuals
and does this affect other aspects of their
lives? These questions may assist in
Fenelon 3
understanding the nature of these commuters
and why they behave in the manner that they
do.
Assumptions/Early Hypotheses
As I entered into this project, I
assumed that the commuter population
would be large and that most people would
be impatient and in a hurry to get to their
destination. As a result, these factors will
influence their behavior as they travel on
their commute. These behaviors may include
pacing, gathering around the door before it
has opened, and pushing to get a spot on the
train. According to “Comparing Stress of
Car and Train Commuters,” “Almost 88% of
all workers get to their jobs by car, with
77.7% driving individual vehicles…while
only 4.6% use some form of public transit.
Only a few major cities are significantly
different in the use of transit modes – New
York, Chicago, and San Francisco have
more people commuting by train than by
car” (111). Based on this research, it was
safe to assume that the commuting
population from New Jersey into New York
City would be a large population.
Based on the literature, and my own
personal experience with commuting into
New York City, it has been noted that the
process of commuting on this route is a
stressful one. It has also been proven that
this stress may have a negative effect on the
body and may even effect other aspects of
one’s life. Evans and Wener emphasize the
fact that this occurrence does not happen
once a day either. These people are exposed
to this type of stress on their way home as
well. The authors write, “There is also
evidence that commuting stress may spill
over into the workplace, possibly affecting
productivity, satisfaction, etc.” (“Comparing
Stress of Car and Train Commuters”).
This commute takes about an hour and a half
in each direction, totaling to roughly three
hours a day. Being under constant stress,
Fenelon 4
dealing with rude people pressed up against
you, and not being able to control a delayed
or cancelled train can take a toll on any
person – and to be doing this twice daily
cannot be healthy. The behaviors of the
commuters will reflect those of whom are
worried and stressed about things they
cannot control.
Ethnographic Methods
My primary method used for my
research was participant-observation along
with visual ethnography and a semi-formal
interview with my brother, Tom. I began my
observations in Clifton, NJ at my local train
station. I stood far away from the yellow
line in order to observe the commuters
standing near the platform edge. I observed
them as they waited for the train to arrive
and their behavior while riding the train. I
then transferred in Secaucus Junction to
catch my second train to New York Penn
Station (NYPS). The commuters on both
trains acted in a similar fashion.
In addition to conducting participant-
observation, I also used visual ethnography.
I did this because it is one thing to hear
about a crowded train or platform but it is
another to actually see it. Physically seeing
the behavior of human beings is a lot easier
than trying to visualize it based on a
description. Lastly, I conducted a semi-
formal interview with my brother, Tom, who
has been commuting from NJ to NY for
about a year and a half. I sat down with him
for about ten to fifteen minutes to gain
insight about his experience as a commuter.
Photo 1 - This is a map of the NJ Transit lines that bring commuters in and out of New York. I take the Main Line, which is depicted by the brighter yellow transit line.
Fenelon 5
The conversation was insightful, to say the
least, and supported much of what the
literature presented.
Data Analysis
I began my observations in Clifton,
NJ when I arrived at the train station for my
6:46 AM inbound train to Hoboken, NJ.
(Note: I usually take the 5:59 AM to
Hoboken, NJ but I missed my train. This
allowed me to gain a new insight about a
different group of commuters who turned
out to be much different from the usual
crowd I am accustomed to). I got out of my
car a few minutes earlier than I usually did
in order to observe those who were waiting
on the platform. I stood alone, away from
the platform edge, in hopes of being able to
observe everyone without raising suspicion.
In general, people were crowded
together in groups and were standing just
behind the yellow line where the entrance
doors usually come to a halt. To my
surprise, most people were talking with one
another. Not many people had headphones
on or had their faces glued to their phones –
most people were smiling and conversing,
coffees in hand. There was still ten minutes
until the train was scheduled to arrive and
the platform was filling up fast.
As time went by, people began to
step onto the yellow line and look down the
tracks, hoping to summon the train a little
faster I guess. When they didn’t see the
train, they began pacing and looking at their
watches (it was evident that the stress levels
Photo 2 – In Clifton, NJ, commuters crowd around the doors right after the train pulled into the station.
Fenelon 6
in them were rising). As the train pulled into
the station, the commuters began crowding
around the doors before the conductors even
had a chance to open them.
I boarded the train, took an aisle seat
in a three-seater and put my headphones in.
There was minimal chatter; just a man on his
cell phone. As the train continued, it became
crowded quickly – people were standing in
the aisles. I got off a few stops later in
Secaucus, NJ. It was here where I
transferred trains in order to get into NY
Penn Station (NYPS). The train from
Secaucus to NYPS was more crowded than
my first train; people were pushing to get on
and became less polite as more and more
people flooded into the cars. I ended up
standing in the aisle towards the back of the
car.
The ride from Secaucus to NYPS is
about nine minutes, if there are no delays or
reasons warranting a reduced speed. Most of
this ride is spent in the tunnel connecting
NY and NJ. Despite this fact, when the train
enters the tunnel, numerous people got up
from their seats and walked down the aisle
towards the exits, like the train would
magically be sitting on Track 11 in NYPS
by the time they reached the door. This led
to more congestion and people pushed their
way through the obviously irritated crowd.
There was no
escape from
the
congestion or
pushing until
we finally
exited the
train and
climbed the
stairs,
bringing us
into an open area known as New York Penn
Station. I then had to board the Uptown A
train but that is a story for a different time.
Photo 3 – Commuters cram onto crowded rail cars. Almost every seat is taken on the way from Secaucus to NYPS, forcing people to stand in the aisles.
Fenelon 7
I conducted a brief interview with
my brother, Tom. He has been a commuter
on this route for a year and a half and has
experienced many things during this time.
First, I asked him how he felt about
commuting and his response was, “It’s just
frustrating.” These frustrations stem from a
number of things: a lack of communication
between NJ Transit and their customers,
trespasser fatalities, signal problems,
tugboats crashing into bridges, etc. Despite
all of this, he would never switch to
commuting by car because that entails a
whole other slew of challenges, such as
traffic and added expenses like gas, tolls,
and parking. I also asked him to describe the
different emotions he felt during his
commute in five words: “Stressed.
Frustrated. Annoyed. Tired. Bleh.” The
inconsistency was the aspect that stressed
him out the most. There are so many
different stages that factor into your
commute, like from one train to another
train to a subway and so on, which leaves
more of an opportunity for things to go
wrong. One delay on one line and your
whole commute could be postponed for over
an hour.
This interview confirmed some of
what I found in the literature. Although he
had numerous issues with the commuting
process as a whole, he would never begin to
commute into NY by car. The literature
stated that “…New York, Chicago, and San
Francisco have more people commuting by
train than by car” (Evans and Wener,
“Comparing Stress of Car and Train
Commuters” 111). If everyone feels
similarly to Tom then it would make sense
why these findings are correct. Additionally,
he added that he would never commute by
car because of the expenses of the commute.
The literature stated that, “For many train
riders, the cost of parking in New York City
made driving to work prohibitively
expensive” (Evans and Wener, “Comparing
Fenelon 8
Stress of Car and Train Commuters” 112). It
is already an expensive trip between the tolls
and gas money; throw in a parking payment
and people may change their minds about
commuting to New York. Lastly, he
confirmed that stress played a role in his
twice-daily commute. The literature on this
topic was limited but from what was
available on commuters from NJ to NY,
stress became a common denominator,
which could carry over and negatively
impact other aspects of their lives. It is not
known exactly which source causes so much
stress in commuters but it is safe to assume
that it is different for everyone.
As a commuter myself, I was not
entirely surprised by any of my findings. I
experience these same challenges when I
commute to school and I can completely
understand why people are frustrated,
stressed, and tired. Only two findings
surprised me while conducting my primary
and secondary research. The first factor that
I was surprised about was the fact that only
a few major cities are the exception to
commuting to work by car. I knew that a lot
of people commuted by car but I did not
expect such a minimal amount of people to
commute via public transportation. The
second thing that surprised me was the
behavior of those on the 6:46 AM train out
of Clifton, NJ. I have never seen commuters
so happy to be standing on a platform in the
frigid cold before the sun came up. On my
usual train, the 5:59 AM, people do not
speak to one another; everyone keeps to
themselves, listens to music, and tries to stay
warm. It was interesting to witness such a
difference in attitudes even though our trains
are only forty-five minutes apart.
Conclusion
Ultimately, I found that commuters
who travel from New Jersey into New York
City are generally stressed, tired, and
become a bit aggressive when there is
crowding or their commute is negatively
Fenelon 9
impacted in any way. Their behavior
demonstrates that they are in a hurry to get
to their destination and that they are not
afraid to throw an elbow towards anyone
who may stand in their way. If the literature
is correct in stating that the stress from
commuting may have an impact on other
aspects of life, I think it is important to
explore options to prevent commuters from
experiencing this. If transit systems decipher
what is causing their commuters so much
stress, maybe they could fix these issues to
the best of their abilities. At the end of the
day, it is all about providing your customers
with the best available product and making
sure that the customer is happy about it.
Miserable commuters will lead to
complaints which may cause people to find
a different mode of commuting, whether that
is the bus or driving themselves.
The stress aspect of this particular
commute should also be investigated more
because it is affecting the health and well-
being of thousands of individuals on a daily
basis. Life is stressful and hectic enough as
it is – the last thing anyone needs is to add to
that craziness and, as a result, impact other
parts of their lives in a negative way.
Commuters are simply people who are
trying to get their destinations in a timely
fashion with little or no disruptions. They
should not be experiencing these negative
emotions. Further investigation should focus
on the stress caused by commuting and what
can be done to reduce it. Life is stressful but
that does not mean that your commute needs
to be.
Fenelon 10
Works Cited
Evans, Gary W., and Richard E. Wener. “Comparing Stress of Car and Train
Commuters.” ScienceDirect, vol. 14, no. 2, 2011, pp. 111-116,
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847810000902. Accessed 5
November 2018.
Evans, Gary W., and Richard E. Wener. “Rail Commuting Duration and Passenger
Stress.” Scopus, vol. 25, no. 3, 2006, pp. 408-412,
https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-
33746401046&origin=inward&txGid=f10d881fbe1594c32d0a69fa86118878. Accessed 5
November 2018.
Fenelon, Tom. Personal Interview. 13 November 2018.
NJ Transit Service Map. The Hudson Terminal Plan. 2018. Real Transit,
http://www.realtransit.org/htp1.php.
Wener, Richard E., et al. “Running for the 7:45: The effects of public transit improvements on
commuter stress.” Transportation, vol. 30, no. 2, 2003, pp. 203-220,
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A1022516221808.pdf. Accessed
12 November 2018.
Fenelon 11
Field Notes
Waiting for the 6:46 AM train: - Lots of people on the platform - Not many waiting in their cars - Commuters are standing in groups – few standing behind the groups alone - People are chatty and friendly - Standing on or just behind the yellow line - People looking down the platform for the train - Pacing up and down - Looking at their watches - People turning around and looking at me
o Weird looks o Can they tell I’m not a regular on this train???
- Not many on their phones or listening to music - Smiling and pleasant - Lots holding travel coffee mugs
Boarding the 6:46 AM train:
- Walking towards platform edge as train approaches - Crowd around the unopened doors - Try to do their best to get on first - Some hang back and wait for everyone else to get on first
On the 6:46 AM train:
- Most of the preferred seats are taken - I find an open aisle seat in a three seater - Most people have head phones in - Minimal chatter - Some doing work on laptops or iPads - I put headphones in and close my eyes - A few stops later – woman taps me and asks me to move
o I moved to let her sit in the middle o Between me and a woman
- People standing in the aisles and vestibules - Playing games on their phones - Still minimal chatter despite the number of people on the train
Fenelon 12
Transferring at Secaucus Junction: - A lot of people exit (about half of the train) - The rest continue into Hoboken, NJ - Go upstairs – everyone heads to Tracks A & B (where trains to NYPS arrive) - Some are running, others speed walking, others taking their time - Lots of people looking at the boards (tells you when and where the trains are expected to
arrive and if there are any delays) - Many people looking at their watches - Train pulls into the station
Train to NYPS:
- People crowd around the doors before they open - Shove to get onto the already crowded train - People in every seat and standing in the aisles - People walking towards doors even though train is still about 7 minutes away from NYPS - Makes the already crowded aisles more crowded - People in aisles irritated - People stand up as we pull into the station – still aren’t by the platform yet - Train stops on the platform - People get pushy when trying to exit - Most people rushing off the platform and into the station