89
Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Policy East Delhi Hub - Kadkadooma TOD project P.S. Uttarwar, Addl. Commissioner (Retd.)/ Consultant, DDA Paromita Roy, Dy. Director, UTTIPEC, DDA 25 th November 2015

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Policyurbanmobilityindia.in/Upload/Conference/ae9770cd-2c9c-4599-80b6-3f0cd3a83bfe.pdf · Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Policy East Delhi Hub

  • Upload
    ngonga

  • View
    226

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Policy East Delhi Hub - Kadkadooma TOD project

P.S. Uttarwar, Addl. Commissioner (Retd.)/ Consultant, DDA

Paromita Roy, Dy. Director, UTTIPEC, DDA

25th November 2015

Maximum people Live, Work & Play

within walking distance of RAPID TRANSIT Stations

Transit Node

Express

BRTS/MRTS

Route

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is essentially any

development, macro or micro, that is focused around a

transit node, and facilitates complete ease of access to the

transit facility, thereby inducing people to prefer to walk and

use public transportation over personal modes of transport.

2

Bazaar Concept - Jaipur

3

TOD policy shall be a paradigm shift in the way neighborhoods and city, in general,

are planned and heralds a new way of linking urban systems to day-to-day living

such that the average person can spend more quality time for social and recreational

purposes rather than getting stuck in traffic jams and decreasing ones productivity

and health.

Taking the Master Plan directive forward, the TOD policy designates a maximum up to

500 m. wide belt (i.e. approximately 5-minute walking distance) on both sides of

centre line of the MRTS Corridor as ‘TOD Zone’, with the exception of areas falling

under Low Density residential Areas (LDRA). TOD zone is a new land use category

which allows flexibility in mix of various possible uses, with the exception of

polluting and potentially hazardous uses. .

About TOD

4

The goal of the TOD Zone is to promote low-carbon high density sustainable

development in the city. The policy has the following major aspects:

Allow flexibility of uses within the overall ambit of the Zonal development plan

land uses.

Mixed use provision to reduce travel demand and reduce pressure on road based

travel.

Optimum FAR and density norms to facilitate people to live work and seek

entrainment within walking distance of stations. These will also seek to

balance/redistribute densities over the city along MRTS corridors.

Creation of finer road networks within neighbourhoods/ development areas for

safer and easy movement of NMT and pedestrians.

Mix of incomes within communities with sharing of public spaces/ greens/

recreational facilities/ amenities between communities.

Salient Features of TOD

5

The goal of the TOD Zone is to promote low-carbon high density sustainable

development in the city. The policy has the following major aspects:

Increase in public safety esp. for women and children using public transport or

walking at night, through changes in key Development Code aspects such as

revised setback norms, dispensing with boundary walls, having built-to-edge

buildings with active frontages which provide ‘eyes-on-the-street’.

Strict planning and regulation of on-street parking shall be undertaken to reduce

private vehicle use.

Approval of projects shall be given through a single-window software based

system to reduce processing time and enable faster-paced (re)development to

take place in the city.

Salient Features of TOD

6

The goal of the TOD Zone is to promote low-carbon high density sustainable

development in the city. The policy has the following major aspects:

Delineation of TOD Zone on respective Zonal Development Plans (ZDP)-

TOD Regulations/ Guidelines-

Developing Software for Single Window Clearance for approval of Building Plan

Relaying of Services

Way Forward

7

The Influence Zone of MRTS Corridors shall be designated as Transit Oriented

Development (TOD) Zone where the following development control norms shall

apply:

FAR and Density:

TOD norms of FAR and density may be availed through the preparation and approval of

comprehensive integrated scheme of minimum size 1 Ha,

a. Maximum ground coverage of 40%. In case of MRTS/ Government Agencies, the

minimum plot size for development shall be 3000 sq.m.

b. For Integrated Scheme, a max. FAR of 400

c. A maximum density of 2000 persons per hectare (PPH).

d. The entire amalgamated plot will be considered for calculating the FAR and density.

e. Mandatory EWS FAR of 15% over and above the maximum permissible FAR shall be

applicable. Additional FAR may be availed through TDR only, for schemes larger

than 1 Ha.

f. All residents residing in that scheme area shall have to be accommodated within

the same scheme

8

Mix of Uses:

Landuse as per

ZDP

(At Least 50% of

total FAR to be as

per ZDP Use)

Indicative Mix of Uses within FAR Utilization

Minimum

Residential*

Minimum

Commercial**

Minimum

Facilities**

Indicative Mix of Uses within remaining 50% FAR, as per

ZDP landuse

RESIDENTIAL 30% 10% 10% Of the remaining FAR, at least 20% or more (upto 70% of

total) is for Residential use.

Other uses are permitted upto 30%.

COMMERCIAL 30% 10% 10% Of the remaining FAR, at least 40% or more is to be for

commercial use.

Other uses are permitted upto 10%.

INDUSTRIAL 30% 10% 10% Remaining 50% of FAR to be for Industrial use.

GOVERNMENT 30% 10% 10% Remaining 50% of FAR may be for any Government use.

TRANSPORTA-

TION

30% 10% 10% Remaining 50% of FAR may be for any use after meeting all

operational requirements for transportation facilities.

Additional norms as per Table 12.7 are applicable.

PUBLIC AND

SEMIPUBLIC

FACILITES (PSP)

30% 10% 10% Of the remaining FAR, at least 40% or more is to be for PSP

use. Other uses are permitted upto 10%.

MIXED-USE 30% 10% 10% Remaining 50% of FAR may be for any use.

9

Roads:

Of the area taken up for development as integrated scheme, at least 20% of land shall

be handed over as constructed roads/ circulation areas to the local body/ road owning

agency for public use. However FAR can be availed on the entire amalgamated land

parcel.

Green Public Open Space Provision:

20% of the area of the amalgamated plot shall be designated as green Public Open

Space which shall be designed, developed and maintained by the DE/agency and will

remain un-gated and open for general public at all times, failing which it will be taken

over by Public agency.

Social Infrastructure:

Social Infrastructure may be allocated the required built-up area within planned

re/development schemes in the form of Accommodation Reservation, instead of

individual plots.

10

Green Buildings:

The entire development has to be with minimum 3 star or gold rating as per approved

rating agencies and appropriate rebate in the property tax may be applicable.

Impact Assessment:

Once the Influence Zone plans for TOD areas are prepared by DDA indicating the street

networks, indicative amalgamations areas, location of public spaces, active edges, etc. a

complete assessment of traffic generation and its dispersal, requirement of services,

mitigation measures for environment impact will be done and got approved from

bodies concerned so that the redevelopment process through TOD can be effective and

beneficial for general public.

11

EAST DELHI HUB - Kadkadooma TOD project

UNIFIED TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE (PLG. & ENGG.) CENTRE

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Kadkadooma Station

ISBT

800 M Catchment

2000 M Catchment

300 M Catchment IPT site

New Station for Metro Phase-III was introduced in 2012.

13

Metro

Proposed BRT

TOD Pilot Project Site

14

`

Overlay of site location on ZDP

Chander Vihar

2000m catchment zone from MRTS-Landuse

17

Scenarios Explored - Three (3 Nos.)

Business As Usual Design Option-1 Design Option-2

Business As Usual-MPD

Residential population = 14060

Residential = 81.7 % of total FAR

Neighborhood & Community level

facilities = 18 % of total FAR

Usable Open Space

= 15% of land area

Ground Coverage = 15 %

Roads = 15% of land area

Density = 500 pph

Densification by MPD-2021

Residential population = 30,375

Residential = 80 % of total FAR

Neighborhood & Community level

facilities = 20 % of total FAR

Usable Open Space

= 30% of land area

Ground Coverage = 20 %

Roads = 20 % of land area

Density = 1242 pph

Densification by TOD principles

Residential population = 21,000

Residential = 50 % of total FAR

Neighborhood, Community & District

level facilities = 25 % of total FAR

Additional Commercial

= 25 % of total FAR

Usable Open Space

= 20% of land area

Ground Coverage = 35%

Roads = 20 % of land area

Density = 830 pph

18

An insights into the residents, students, businesses and professionals

Stakeholder Consultations

Stakeholder consultations were conducted – for prioritizing of civic amenities

• RWAs and discussions with residents (formal and informal neighborhoods)

• Trader Associations

• NGOs and civil society institutions

• Schools – Workshop with private school children/ discussion with government teachers

• Pradhans and local ward counselors

Planned Colonies

1. Mixed-use at main street level (banks, property dealers)

2. Re-densifying into G+4 developer flats (with stilts)

3. Gated Colonies with no thoroughfare

4. Rental: Ownership Rate = 30:70

5. Typologies: 100 sq.m. - 300 sq.m.

6. Costs of home: Rs 2.2 crore +

7. Rental costs: Rs 25,000+

8. Staff: drivers, maids, gardener, guard, vegetable seller- live in informal settlements in both ownership and rent

9. RWA concerns: congestion

10. MCD Site engineer concerns: Maintenance and infrastructure repair issues

• Urban Villages: Karkardooma Village

• Un-authorized Colonies:

• Slums: Anand Vihar JJ Slum

1. Mixed-use areas

2. Rental : Ownership rate = 70: 30

3. Rental costs: Rs 500-700 per person

4. Typologies: 16 sq.m. - 40 sq.m.

5. Issues: water quality, under-employment, no open spaces for activity; under utilized areas

Informal Colonies

Safety a key concern for young girls

Students (age 4-9) walk to school- cross the KKD site

No space for activity outside school hours/summer holidays

Adequate hospitals, schools and dispensaries

Adequate public and private schools in the location

Discussion with Class 12 students + Interview with Primary

Government School Teacher

TOD CONCEPTS

adopted in the Pilot Project

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

CHANGES FROM

PREVIOUS LAYOUT PLAN

Existing Layout Plan

44

SITE AREA: 30.72 Ha

AREA UNDER SCHEME: 28.12 Ha

USE WISE DISTRIBUTION OF PLOTS

COMMERCIAL USE : 1.48 Ha

RESIDENTIAL USE: 13.16 Ha

PUBLIC- SEMI PUBLIC: 4.27 Ha

AREA UNDER CIRCULATION: 5.00Ha

AREA UNDER OPEN SPACE: 4.25 Ha

GROSS FAR: 1.09

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA: 3,06,700

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA USES:

COMMERCIAL: 249000 sq.m.

RESIDENTIAL: 14800 sq.m.

PUBLIC- SEMI PUBLIC: 42700 sq.m.

Commercial

Open Space

Residential

Public- semi public

LEGEND

Proposed Layout Plan

45

At least 30% residential and 30% commercial/ institutional use of FAR is mandatory in every project within Intense and Standard TOD

Zone

TOD Mixed Use Zone

Housing (30%)

Commercial/Instituional (30%)Other (40%)20%

(C+I)

30%

(R)

50%

3. Minimum Use- Mix Criteria

20%

50%

46

30%

5% 10%

15%

47

3. Minimum Use- Mix Criteria

Minimum 15% of FAR for all TOD projects to be allocated to rental or for-sale housing with unit sizes no larger than 25sq.m. Of this, minimum 5% should be of one of the following types:

i. Units with only kitchen and no attached toilets. Toilets to be provided as a shared facility on every floor, segregated for male and female.

ii. Units with shared kitchen and dining space as well as shared toilet facilities. Maximum 8 units to a shared kitchen and toilet/ bathing facility.

iii. Dormitories with shared toilets and kitchens. iv. Hostels v. Daily rental homes, which may be rented in shifts.

REMAINING MIXED USE 70%

UNIT SIZE 40Sq.m. 15%

OTHER

UNITS=25SQ.M 10%

HOUSING TYPE AS SPECIFIED ABOVE

5% UNIT SIZE

25Sq.m. 15%

48

3. Minimum Use- Mix Criteria

PROPOSAL:

REVISED LAYOUT PLAN

Proposed Layout Plan

Proposed Block Layout – As Part Of Layout Plan

Zoning Of Uses In Relation To Context- Commercial

HIGH END RETAIL

SHOWROOMS

COMMERCIAL TOWERS & SERVICE APARTMENT

SERVICE MARKET

CONVIENIENT SHOPPING

LIVE WORK

Frontage criteria for locating commercial retail &

towers

Live work As interface between commercial

and residential units

Convenience shopping Scattered in small proportions

throughout the development

Service market along Secondary road

Zoning of uses in relation to context- Civic

School & Art District Civic amenities as an interface between new and existing community

Hospital Accessibility criteria located on plot next to Zonal Plan roads

College Proximity to existing institutional areas.

Zoning of uses in relation to context- Residential

Transit village zone Proximity to existing EWS

housing

Towers

Along side open spaces

Town homes

Along road side

© UTTIPEC, Delhi Development Authority

View of Plot-A from Vikas Marg

55

D

F G

J

K

L

H

I

N

O

Q

M

C

B

P

E

A

Plot-C Detail

A

D

F G

J

K

L

H

I

N

O

Q

M

C

B

P

E

Ground floor Plan – Plot-C

Locations that may be gated at night

Ground floor Plan – Plot-C

Private Green area with tot-lots etc.

First floor Plan

Residential

Office

Retail

Service apartment

Civic

Residential

Office

Retail

Service apartment

Civic

Second floor Plan

Residential

Office

Retail

Service apartment

Civic

Third floor Plan

Residential

Office

Retail

Service apartment

Civic

4th to 8th Typical floor Plan

Residential

Office

Retail

Service apartment

Civic

Roof Plan

Commercial Typology

Traffic Impact Assessment

TOD Walking Zone – 500 m

TOD NMT Zone – 1500 m

66

67

• Presents Existing Traffic Data at Junctions and Roads

• Signal control

• Flyovers

• Rail Constraints

• Potentials – Metro Stations / Anand Vihar Terminal

Existing Transport Conditions and Data Collection

1. Mix Use Internal Trip Generation Model – For estimates of internal Trip capture. Based on 239 case studies of mixed use by US EPA ( Fehr & Peers)

2. Road & Transit Traffic Generation Model – for estimating vehicular and Transit Traffic Generation from site.

Based on Trip Generation Rates derived from functional land-uses (commercial, office & residential etc) in Indian cities.

Data from Transport Demand Forecast Study by GNTCD.

Large number of Live Case Studies on Mixed use & TOD show that Mix use, High density near Transit station, Reasonable parking control and smaller housing units help in High internal trip capture & high Transit use.

68

Trip Generation Model Used

Trip Generation Model Results

69

Mix Use Trip Generation Model Results

1. Mix land-use scenario provides 27 percent internal trips capture. Single use provides 8 percent trip capture.

2. About 19 percent more internal trips in Mixed use

Road & Transit Traffic Generation Model Results

1. Vehicular Trips estimated as 3659 PCUs requiring additional 2x2 lane road.

2. Transit Trips estimated as additional 5533 PHPDT requiring adequate metro frequency, coaches and BRT development .

70

Generated Road Traffic Impacts on Network

1. Site is surrounded by Railway line and there is single Road for site access.

2. The assignment of generated traffic on network indicates that existing Road & junction capacities are not adequate to handle additional traffic.

3. New 2x2 lane Road shall be built with extra connection in surrounding network for distributing generated traffic to larger area

Road & Transit Traffic Generation Model Results

1. Enhanced Metro Frequency, extra coaches

2. Dedicated Bus lanes in new Road and connectivity with surrounding BRT Network.

3. Control of Car use by limited & market-priced provision of Parking.

Impacts

ZDP proposed road to be constructed

Feasibility Aspect – Undergrounding HT Lines

220 KV

400 KV

SUB STATION

72

Feasibility – Alignment & Connectivity

Connectivity with Road No. 56

Connectivity with Karkari Mor Road

73

Decentralized Infrastructure

Water Supply & Sewage Treatment

ORIGINAL

Water provided by Delhi Jal Board: 2.7 mld

27000 population: Water required (potable) – 2.4 mld BUA residential (12.5 m2 per person – NBC) – 337000 m2

No of Dwelling units (5 person per unit): 27000/5 = 5400 dwelling units Dwelling unit per ha: Total Dwelling unit/Total Ha: 5400/30 = 180 DU/HA

As per Delhi norms: 27000/4.5 = 6000

Dwelling unit as per Delhi norms: 200 DU/HA

34600 commercial population: Water required (potable) – 0.9 mld

Total Water demand: 2.4 + 0.9 = 3.3 mld Deficit: 3.3 – 2.7 = 0.6 mld

Total Demand: 5.7 mld (both potable and non potable) We want: 3.3 mld (Potable)

Projected Water Demand

Projected Water Demand

27000 commercial population: Water required (potable) – 0.9 mld

Potable water available for residential – 1.8 mld Total population that can use 1.8 mld of potable water for residential

purpose: 21000 people Total BUA would be (12.5m2 per person – NBC): 262500 m2

Dwelling unit (NBC): 21000/5 = 4200

Dwelling unit per unit HA: 4000/30 = 140

Dwelling unit (Delhi norms) 21000/4.5 = 4600 Dwelling unit per unit HA: 4600/30 = 153 DU/HA

Decentralised Infrastructure

Water Balance

All these calculation was made as per NBC guidelines

Total Water requirement is 4257 m3 per day

Domestic = 2700 m3/ day Flushing = 1419

m3 per day Gardening =

434 m3/day

Total sewage Generated = 2295 + 1419 = 3714 m3/day

Evaporation

losses =5%

Fresh water from Delhi = 2700 m3 per day

Sewage Treatment

Plant Capacity 50 m3

per day (abt 75

plants)

STP treated water = 1419 m3 per day

STP Treated water

3528 m3 per day

85% is wastewater =

2295 m3 per day

Treated sewage sump Q = 3528

m3/day

Excess treated sewage to

sewerage system

1675 m3/day

Area Needed for 75 Phytorids: 6000m2

Power

Energy Conservation Strategies

Views showing the number of hours of daily direct solar insolation on all façades of the proposed buildings on December 21. The north oriented corners are devoid of direct sunlight.

Solar Access

View from South View from East

View from North View from West 79

Resi. Towers Rotated to facilitate all homes receiving min. 2-hour sunlight

Solid Waste Management Strategy

Solid Waste Management Strategy

Waste generated Commercial Population: 27000 Residential Population: 21000

Total waste (kg/day) 37128.0

Total waste (Tons/day) 37.1

Total organic waste (40%) (Tons/day) 14.9

Paper (27%) (Tons/day) 10.0

Textile (4%) (Tons/day) 1.5

Plastic and rubber (4%) (Tons/day) 1.5

metal (3%) (Tons/day) 1.1

Glass and ceramics (5%) (Tons/day) 1.9

Innert (15%) (Tons/day) 5.6

Treatment- Briquetting

Solid waste

Segregated organic waste

Biogas plant digester

Biogas storage (power or electricity)

Non biodegradable waste

Briquettes

Innert

Secured Landfill

Sold at Rs. 2000 per ton

After they are compressed, total volume of dry waste reduced to 10% of its original volume. Calorific value of briquette is about 3000 – 3700 kcal.

Scenario 1 (Dry waste: 10.8 tons/day): Reduced volume to 1.1 tons of briquettes Sold at Rs. 2000 per ton: 2000 x 1.1 = Rs. 2200 per day Scenario 2 (Dry waste: 16 tons/day): Reduced volume to 1.6 tons of briquettes Sold at Rs. 2000 per ton: 2000 x 1.6 = Rs. 3200 per day

Treatment- Bio-Gas

Capacity: 5.5 tons/day Number needed: 3 Total Area needed: 1050 m2

Total methane: 1200 m3

LPG equivalent: 13200 kg/month Electricity Equivalent: 47100 unit/month Installation cost (per unit) Rs. 5.5 cr (for LPG) Rs. 6.8 cr (for Electricity) Profit Taking Rs. 450 per 14 kg of LPG; earning from 13200 kg would be 4.2 lakhs per month Taking cost of electricity Rs. 5 per unit; saving from 47100 unit would be 2.4 lakhs per month

Financial Feasibility Study

METHODOLOGY

Overview of Subject Region

and its Influence

Zone

Macro Market

Assessment of Core

Real Estate Sectors

in the Region

Real Estate Market Assessment

- Residential

- Commercial

- Retail

- Hospitality

Review of Present Development Control

Regulations & Proposed TOD Norms

Demand Perception Assessment

Validation of Proposed Product Mix

Pricing Strategy for Various Proposed Asset Classes

- Financial Feasibility of Proposed Base Product Scenario

- Scenario Iteration to assess Opportunity for Cross Subsidization : Infrastructure, Amenities & Affordable Housing

Suggestions & Recommendations

Project Description: Methodology

86

87

88

Circular Skywalk connecting destinations to Metro

THANKS