Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTEGRATED FOOD POLICY RESEARCH PROGRAM | EVENT REPORT | July 2017
Training Report
A summary of the capacity enhancement training of select engineers who would conduct
physical assessment of food storage facilities across the nation (Deliverable: 3.3.2)
Submitted to:
Md. Gazi Ur Rahman Project Director (Joint Secretary), Modern Food Storage Facilities Project Directorate General of Food, Government of Bangladesh.
This report has not been subjected to a formal external review via IFPRI’s Publications Review Committee.
The report is circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The views and opinions expressed in
this report are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of IFPRI or its JV members.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Selection of the engineers for the survey ............................................................................................ 2
1.2 Designing of the survey tools ............................................................................................................ 2
2. Roll out of the training ................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Basic details ................................................................................................................................... 3
3. Training Sessions .......................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Inauguration session ........................................................................................................................ 3
3.2 Introduction to the questionnaire and online data collection tool ............................................................ 4
3.3 Simulated activity ............................................................................................................................ 5
3.4 Recap of the training and final words ................................................................................................. 6
Annex – 1: Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................................ 8
Annex – 2: Training Schedule ............................................................................................................................. 22
1
Acronyms
BIDS Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
CAPI Computer-Assisted Personal Interview
CSD Central Storage Depot
DG Food Directorate General of Food
IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute
IFPRP Integrated Food Policy Research Program
JV IFPRI-BIDS-UIUC Joint Venture
MFSP Modern Food Storage Facilities Project
MoF Ministry of Food
PMU
RME
Project Management Unit
Regional Maintenance Engineer
2
1. BACKGROUND The Integrated Food Policy Research Program (IFPRP) with technical guidance of the Directorate General of Food
(DG Food) launched a primary survey to assess the physical conditions of all public food-grain storage facilities
located across the country. The objective of the survey is to collect and process primary data specific to the
physical condition of food storage facilities, allowing policymakers to develop an action plan as to how to make
utmost utilization of the facilities. In order to roll out the survey, the IFPRI-led JV hired thirty civil engineers to
conduct this survey and a robust data collection tool along with a comprehensive questionnaire were designed.
The select engineers were trained by the IFPRI-led JV to increase their capacity to collect information from the
storage facilities. Annex – 1 contains the questionnaires that are being used in the study.
1.1 Selection of the engineers for the survey
A total of 30 enumerators were selected for this study. All enumerators recruited for the survey were drawn from
a list of engineers, who were required to have a minimum qualification of Diploma in Civil Engineering. After
conducting initial screening, 47 applicants were interviewed in June 2017 at the IFPRP project office. The
applications were interviewed by a panel consisting of a Field Survey Coordinator, Engr. Md. Abu Bakar, a
representative from the Directorate General of Food, Engr. Md. Rafiqul Rahman Mazumder, and members of the
IFPRP Research Team, Dr. Kindie Getnet, Mr. Tofazzal Hossain and Mr. Razin Iqbal Kabir.
The applicants were questioned on their educational background, relevant work experience and were tested for
technical competencies. The applicants were assessed and marked along five criteria: Education, Experience,
Computer/Tablet Use Ability, Communication Skill, and Personality.
After summing up their scores in each criterion, the top 30 candidates were selected based on their overall score.
Successful candidates were notified upon their selection. Once their participation was confirmed, the select
enumerators were asked to sign a short-term employment contract and join the training event held at the
Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) from July 17 to 20, 2017.
1.2 Designing of the survey tools
The study employed a quantitative questionnaire to collect information on the existing infrastructure, needed
repairs, and economic value of each of the 652 existing public food storage facilities in Bangladesh. This
questionnaire was developed and continually revised over a period of 2 months, with significant inputs from both
the IFPRP Research Team and the Modern Food Storage Facilities Project’s (MFSP) Project Management Unit
(PMU).
The questionnaire was used to collect information on GIS location, present functionality, godown-level
repair/reconstruction needs, overall infrastructure repair estimates, new construction requirements, community
encroachments, and perceptions of the local community regarding the social importance and market value of the
facilities. A draft version of the questionnaire was used for training and pre-testing. All relevant feedback from the
training and pre-test was used to develop a final draft, with which the enumerators were sent to the field.
Alongside the paper questionnaires, the IFPRP Research Team also developed a Computer-Assisted Personal
Interview (CAPI) form developed using SurveyCTO for Android. The CAPI form included skip logic and value
constraints to minimize data entry error. During the training, select enumerators were trained to collect data using
3
Android tablets, and to upload the data on a regular schedule on to a dedicated server for the project (hosted at:
https://bifprp.surveycto.com).
2. ROLL OUT OF THE TRAINING The IFPRI led JV conducted the trainings of the select engineers on July 17, 2017 (detailed training schedule is
provided in Annex – 2). The training sessions were facilitated by Mr. Tofazzal Hossain, former Director, Admin of
DG Food and consultant of IFPRI Bangladesh, Mr. Razin Iqbal Kabir, senior research assistant at IFPRI Bangladesh,
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar, former Regional Maintenance Engineer (RME) at DG Food and Field Survey Coordinator of
IFPRI, Mr. Engr. Bimal Bhuiyan, Regional Maintenance Engineer of DG Food engineer at MFSP project, Dr.
Mohammad Yunus, Senior Research Fellow of BIDS and Dr. Mohammad Mainul Hoque, Research Fellow of BIDS.
The hands-on training helped to increase competency and capacity of the select engineers and attuned them to
the survey tools and data collection process. Basic details of the training are provided below.
2.1 Basic details
The 4-day long training was participated by 30 select engineers and the training was held at BIDS conference room.
Training title : “Enumerator Training for Physical Condition Assessment of Food Storage
Facilities in Bangladesh Survey”
Number of trainees : 30
Duration of the training : 4 days (July 17, 2017 – July 20, 2017)
Name of Facilitators :
1. Dr. Mohammad Yunus, BIDS
2. Mr. Tofazzal Hossain, Consultant, IFPRI
3. Engr. Md. Abu Bakar, Field Survey Coordinator, IFPRI
4. Razin Iqbal Kabir, Senior Research Assistant, IFPRI
3. TRAINING SESSIONS
The 4-day long training was broken down into 5 themes for the convenience of the trainees and the facilitators.
3.1 Inauguration session
The training event was inaugurated by a panel consisting of personnel involved in the training and chief guests
from the BIDS. The panel included Dr. K.A.S. Murshid, Director General, BIDS, Dr. Mohammad Yunus, Senior
Research Fellow, BIDS, Dr. Mohammad Mainul Hoque, Research Fellow, BIDS, Mr. Tofazzal Hossain, Consultant,
IFPRI-Dhaka and Mr. Md. Abu Bakar, Field Survey Coordinator, IFPRI-Dhaka.
4
Engr. Abu Bakar addressed the enumerators, stating his position as the Field Survey Coordinator and hoping to
work well with all enumerators in answering their queries and monitoring their work. Mr. Hossain stressed the
importance of the survey to the project and DG Food in making decisions on repair and reconstruction of the
storage facilities. Dr. Yunus stressed the importance of the quality of the data, which is the key determinant of the
value of any research, and these statements were echoed by Dr. Hoque. Finally, Dr. Murshid offered words of
advice to the enumerators, emphasizing the importance of this research in downstream policy decisions, the
uniqueness of the survey – the first of its kind in Bangladesh, and the need for quality data to make these decisions
possible.
3.2 Introduction to the questionnaire and online data collection tool
The second day of the training was facilitated by Mr. Tofazzal Hossain and Mr. Razin Iqbal Kabir of IFPRI who
thoroughly explained the questionnaire to the select enumerators. In addition, they also responded to the queries
that the enumerators had. Moreover, select enumerators were introduced to the online data collection tool,
SurveyCTO, and Mr. Kabir showed them how to input data in the software.
Mr. Md. Rezaul Karim Sheikh, Deputy Project Director of MFSP, Dr. Zahurul Karim, International Consultant for
Food Policy Research Program, and Dr. Fakhrul Islam, National Consultant for Food Policy Research Program
participated in the training session to share their views and expectations from this survey. In his remarks, Mr.
Karim mentioned that it is important for the enumerators to collect data accurately from the field and results of
this survey will be shared with policymakers. Dr. Zahurul Karim mentioned that this survey of public storage
facilities is the first survey of its kind and therefore MFSP is looking forward to this survey’s results. Terming this
survey as a national census, he asked all enumerators to perform their role with sincerity and utmost dedication.
He also mentioned that the Ministry of Food and the MFSP Office will provide all-out cooperation for easy access
of the enumerators to the public storage facilities. Dr. Fakhrul Islam in his remarks also emphasized on the
importance of accurate data collection.
Dr. K.A.S. Murshid, Director General of BIDS making his remarks. Photo Credit: IFPRP project
5
3.3 Simulated activity
In close cooperation with DG Food, the IFPRI-led JV organized a simulated activity for the select engineers to
practically conduct assessment of godowns under Tejgaon Central Storage Depot (CSD). The enumerators were
accompanied by Engr. Bimal Bhuiyan of DG Food, Mr. Razin Kabir, Senior Research Assistant of IFPRI and Mr.
Tofazzal Hossain, Consultant of IFPRI along with CSD Manager, Mr. Md. Humayun Kabir and CSD staff to conduct
the survey pretest. During the pretest, select enumerators worked in small groups to access physical conditions
of select godowns and input the collected data using SurveyCTO. The simulation increased both technical capacity
and confidence of the enumerators to conduct the field survey.
Dr. Zahurul Karim, International Consultant for Food Policy Research Program, making his remarks. Photo Credit: IFPRP project
Select engineers participate in simulated activity. Photo Credit: IFPRP project
6
3.4 Recap of the training and final words
On the last day of the training, the questionnaires and the online survey tool were fined tuned to address the
loopholes discovered during the training sessions. A brief recap was conducted by Mr. Tofazzal Hossain,
Consultant at IFPRI and Mr. Razin Iqbal Kabir, Senior Research Assistant at IFPRI. All last-minute queries were
addressed by the IFPRI-led JV team and select enumerators were handed over with necessary logistics and tablets
for data collection from the field.
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain, Consultant of IFPRI responding to participant queries. Photo Credit: IFPRP project
7
Acknowledgments
IFPRI led JV highly appreciates the input of MFSP Project Management Unit for their inputs in designing the survey
questionnaires and for making time to participate in one of the sessions of the training. IFPRI Research team is
also thankful to BIDS for their support service to conduct the training at their facility.
8
ANNEX – 1: SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
PHYSICAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES IN BANGLADESH 2017
9
Introduction
Good morning/afternoon. My name is ___________________________________. I am part of a team carrying out a study to analyse the current physical condition of public
storage facilities in Bangladesh. The study is being conducted by an IFPRI-led research project titled “Integrated Food Policy Research Program”, funded by the Government
of Bangladesh under a World Bank fund. The data collected for this study will be used only for research purposes. We would like to assess the current physical condition of
this facility to be able to estimate the repair costs for any repairs that might be needed, and whether or not new godowns may need to be built.
SECTION A. IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
Section A1. Storage Facility Location
A1_1. Division Barisal = 10 Chittagong = 20 Dhaka = 30 Mymensingh = 35 Khulna = 40 Rajshahi = 50 Rangpur = 55 Sylhet = 60
[__|__]
A1_2. District name
A1_3. Upazila name
A1_4. Facility name
A1_5. Facility ID [__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__]
A1_6. Facility type LSD = 1 CSD = 2 Silo = 3
[__]
A1_7. Year built [__|__|__|__]
Section A2. GPS Location
A2_1. GPS latitude [__|__]° [__|__]’ [__|__]”
A2_2. GPS longitude [__|__]° [__|__]’ [__|__]”
Section A3. Land Area
A3_1. Total land area (acres)
A3_2. Storage area (sq. ft.)
A3_3. Ancillary facilities area (sq. ft.)
A3_4. Open space (sq. ft.)
Section A4. Respondent’s Information
A4_1. Name of the respondent
A4_2. Sex of respondent Male = 1 Female = 2
[__]
A4_3. Official Designation Storage and Movement Officer = 1 Officer in Charge = 2 Manager = 3 Silo Superintendent = 4
[__]
A4_4. Mobile phone number [__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__]
A4_5. Land phone number [__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__]
Section A5. Engineer and Interview Information
A5_1. Interview date 1 [__|__] / [__|__] / [__|__|__|__]
A5_2. Interview date 2 (if needed) [__|__] / [__|__] / [__|__|__|__]
A5_3. Engineer’s name
A5_4. Engineer’s code [__|__]
10
SECTION B. PRESENT FUNCTIONALITY AND TOTAL STOCK
Section B1. Present Functionality
Question Codes Response
B1_1 Is this storage facility currently functional?
Yes = 1 No = 2
[__]
1 Section B2
B1_2 If “No”, why not? (multiple responses possible)
All or most of the godowns at this facility are dilapidated beyond repair = 1 No structures exist at present = 2 Structure exists, but there is no food storage program here at present = 3 Facility has been washed away by the river = 4 Other = 5
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify:
[_____________________________________]
End survey here.
Section B2. Total Stock Position at this Facility (on April 1, 2017)
Commodity Quantity (MT)
B2_1 Rice stock
B2_2 Wheat stock
B2_3 Paddy stock
11
SECTION C. PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE STORAGE FACILITY
TO COMPLETE SECTION C1, PLEASE USE THE GODOWN REPAIR ESTIMATE FORM. TO COMPLETE SECTION C2, PLEASE USE THE INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR ESTIMATE FORM.
Section C3. New Godown Construction Requirements
Question Code Response
C3_1 Is there any felt need / requirement to build new godowns? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] 2 Section C4
C3_2 If “Yes”, what is the reason? Current capacity is limited throughout the year = 1 Current capacity is limited, but only seasonally = 2
[__]
C3_3 If a new godown is needed, is there enough open space available? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] 2 Section C4
C3_3_1 If “Yes”, is the open space appropriate for godown construction? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] 2 Section C4
C3_3_2 If “Yes”, what is the estimated length of the appropriate site (ft.)? [________________________] ft.
C3_3_3 If “Yes”, what is the estimated width of the appropriate site (ft.)? [________________________] ft.
12
Section C4. Weigh Bridge Condition and Community Encroachments
Question Code Response
C4_1 Is there a weigh bridge at this facility? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] 2 C4_2
C4_1_1 If “Yes”, is the weigh bridge currently functional? Yes = 1 No = 2 [__]
C4_2 Is there any problem from local community encroachment to the compound of the storage facility or from other types of destructive interventions/interferences?
Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] 2 Section D
C4_3 If “Yes”, what are the types of encroachments/interferences?
(multiple responses possible)
Land claim by neighbours = 1 Boundary conflict with adjacent land owners = 2 Theft attempts = 3 Public sewerage lines through the facility = 4 Electrical lines through the facility = 5 Telephone lines through the facility = 6 Community waste disposal = 7 Public roads through the facility = 8 Other = 9
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify:
[________________________________]
SECTION D. PRE-CLEANING AND DRYING FACILITIES FOR PADDY PROCUREMENT
Question Code Response
D1 Do you have adequate pre-cleaning facilities for paddy procurement? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__]
D2 Do you have adequate drying facilities for paddy procurement? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__]
13
SECTION E. PERCEPTIONS REGARDING SOCIAL IMPORTANCE AND MARKET VALUE OF THE STORAGE FACILITIES
Question Code Response
Local Leader 1 Local Leader 2
E1_1 In your opinion, does this storage facility provide benefits to the community?
Yes = 1 No = 2 Both yes and no = 3
[__]
1, 3 E1_2 2 E1_3
[__]
1, 3 E1_2 2 E1_3
E1_2 If “Yes” (or “Both yes and no”), what are these benefits?
(multiple responses possible)
Farmers/millers can sell their produce to the godown = 1 Farmers/millers are given incentives to sell food-grains to godowns = 2 Godowns help ensure food security for the community during disasters = 3 Godowns help stabilize the market price of food-grains = 4 Godowns provide employment opportunities for local community members = 5 Other = 6
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify:
[_________________]
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify:
[_________________]
E1_3 If “No” (or “Both yes and no”), why do you not think that this facility is beneficial to this community?
Farmers/millers have to sell their produce at a fixed price = 1 Facility does not have adequate stock to ensure food security for the local community = 2 Facility mostly serves other communities = 3 Stock at this facility is not fresh = 4 Facility does not have adequate storage capacity = 5 Other = 6
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify: [__________________]
[__] [__] [__] [__] [__] [__]
If “Other”, please specify: [__________________]
E1_4 What is the average rental cost of agricultural land in the nearby area? (BDT/per decimal/year)
BDT/decimal/year
[__________________] BDT/decimal/year
[__________________]
E1_5 What is the average sale price of agricultural land in the nearby area? (BDT/per decimal)
BDT/decimal
[__________________] BDT/decimal
[__________________]
E1_6 What is the rental cost of storing food-grains in private commercial storage facilities in the nearby community? (BDT/sq. ft./year)
BDT/sq. ft./year [__________________]
BDT/sq. ft./year [__________________]
14
Question Code Response
Local Leader 1 Local Leader 2
E1_7 In your view, what would be the rental value of the entire facility (BDT/year)?
E1_7L As agricultural land: BDT/year [___________________]
BDT/year [___________________]
E1_7R As real estate (without building): BDT/year [___________________]
BDT/year [___________________]
E1_7RB As real estate (with the current building / godowns):
BDT/year [___________________]
BDT/year [___________________]
E1_8 In your view, what would be the sale value of this entire facility (in BDT)?
BDT [___________________]
BDT [___________________]
15
GODOWN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FORM
Section C1. Godown Condition and Capacity Information
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS: On the following pages, fill up the table for each godown. Record the Godown ID at the top of each table. Once completed, attach this form (for every godown) with the main questionnaire.
C1_1. Godown ID [__|__|__]
A1_5. Facility ID [__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__]
C1_2. Godown length (ft.) [__|__|__]
C1_3. Godown width (ft.) [__|__|__]
C1_4. Rated Capacity (MT) a
C1_5. Usable Capacity (MT) b
C1_6. Unusable Capacity (MT) c = a-b
C1_7. Year of construction [__|__|__|__]
C1_8. Number of repairs since construction Never repaired = 0 Repaired, but number not known = 999
[__|__|__] 0 C1_11
C1_9. Year of last repair Not known = 9999 [__|__|__|__] 9999 C1_11
C1_10. Cost of last repair (lakh BDT) Not known = 0 [__|__|__]
C1_11. Is there a weighing scale in this godown? Yes = 1 Yes, but not functional = 2 No = 3
[__]
C1_12. Does this godown need to be dismantled? Yes = 1 No = 2
[__]
2 C1_14_1
C1_13. If “Yes”, does the godown need to be reconstructed/replaced?
Yes = 1 No = 2
[__] Take photos of this godown and then skip to the next godown.
16
GODOWN INTERIOR
1. INTERIOR FLOOR AND CEILING
Part of the Godown Measurement Units
C1_14_1. Floor
a) Depression
cft.
b) Crack
ft.
c) Worn out
sq. ft.
C1_14_2. Ceiling
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Crack
ft.
c) Painting
sq. ft.
d) Re-bar exposure
sq. ft.
C1_14_3. Columns
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Crack
ft.
c) Painting
sq. ft.
d) Re-bar exposure
sq. ft.
C1_14_4. Beams
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Crack
ft.
c) Painting
sq. ft.
d) Re-bar exposure
sq. ft.
17
2. INTERIOR WALLS
Part of the Godown Measurement Units
C1_14_5. North Wall (Inside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Skirting plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Painting
sq. ft.
C1_14_6. South Wall (Inside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Skirting plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Painting
sq. ft.
C1_14_7. East Wall (Inside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Skirting plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Painting
sq. ft.
C1_14_8. West Wall (Inside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Skirting plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Painting
sq. ft.
18
GODOWN EXTERIOR
1. EXTERIOR WALLS
Part of the Godown Measurement Units
C1_14_9. North Wall (Outside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Dado plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Snowcem
sq. ft.
C1_14_10. South Wall (Outside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Dado plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Snowcem
sq. ft.
C1_14_11. East Wall (Outside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Dado plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Snowcem
sq. ft.
C1_14_12. West Wall (Outside)
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Dado plaster
sq. ft.
c) Crack
ft.
d) Snowcem
sq. ft.
19
2. LOADING DOCK, CANOPY AND ROOFTOP
Part of the Godown Measurement Units
C1_14_13. Loading dock – FRONT
a) Nosing with Angle
ft.
b) Floor
sq. ft.
C1_14_14. Loading dock – REAR
a) Nosing with Angle
ft.
b) Floor
sq. ft.
C1_14_15. Canopy – FRONT
a) Ceiling – plaster
sq. ft.
b) Rooftop – patent stone
sq. ft.
C1_14_16. Canopy – REAR
a) Ceiling – plaster
sq. ft.
b) Rooftop – patent stone
sq. ft.
C1_14_17. Godown Rooftop
a) Screeding
sq. ft.
20
3. DRAINAGE AND APRON
Part of the Godown Measurement Units
C1_14_18. Drain
a) Broken
ft.
b) Worn out
sq. ft.
c) New construction
ft.
C1_14_19. Apron
a) Broken
sq. ft.
b) Worn out
sq. ft.
c) New construction
sq. ft.
21
INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR ESTIMATE FORM Section C2. Infrastructure (Physical Conditions of Approach Roads, Main Drain, Main Gate and Boundary Wall)
A1_5. Facility ID [__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__]
Item Measurement Units
C2_1. R.C.C. Road
a) Broken
cft.
b) New construction
sq. ft.
c) Re-construction
sq. ft.
C2_2. H.B.B. Road
a) Broken
sq. ft.
C2_3. Main Drain
a) Broken
ft.
b) Worn out
sq. ft.
c) New construction
ft.
C2_4. Main Gate
a) Replace
sq. ft.
b) Repair
sq. ft.
C2_5. Boundary Wall
a) Plaster
sq. ft.
b) Coping
cft.
c) Column
cft.
d) Barbed wire fencing
sq. ft.
e) New construction
ft.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENGINEERS: Fill up the following table to estimate infrastructure repair quantities for. Only fill out 1 of these forms for the entire facility.
22
Annex – 2: TRAINING SCHEDULE
Enumerator Training for Physical Condition Assessment of Food
Storage Facilities in Bangladesh Survey
Duration July 17-20, 2017
Venue Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS)
E-17 Agargaon, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka
Day 1: Monday, July 17, 2017
Time Topic Speakers/Facilitators
9:30 am 10:00 am Registration and Introductions of Enumerators and Trainers Dr. K.A.S. Murshid
Dr. Mohammad Yunus
Dr. Mainul Hoque
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
10:01 am 10:15 am Overview of the Physical Assessment Survey Task Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
10:16 am 10:45 am Functions and Context of the PFDS in meeting the food needs of
Bangladesh
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
10:46 am 11:00 am Tea break and Shift to Smaller Meeting Room Until 1:00 pm
11:01 am 12:30 pm Engineering Estimates: Basic Concepts Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
12:31 pm 1:30 pm Lunch break
1:31 pm 1:45 pm Introduction to Survey Questionnaires
- Physical Assessment Survey Main Questionnaire
- Godown Repair Estimation Form
- Infrastructure Repair Estimation Form
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
1:46 pm 2:15 pm Section A: Identification Information
Section B: Capacity and Stock
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Razin Iqbal Kabir
2:16 pm 4:00 pm Section C: Physical Condition of the Storage Facility
- ++ Godown Repair Estimation Form
- ++ Infrastructure Repair Estimation Form
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
4:01 pm 4:15 pm Tea break
4:16 pm 5:00 pm Section C: (continued)
Section D: Pre-Cleaning and Drying Facilities
Section E: Community Perceptions
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
5:01 pm 5:30 pm DISCUSSION / Q&A
Day 2: Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Time Topic Speakers/Facilitators
9:30 am 10:00 am Recap of Day 1 topics Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
10:01 am 10:30 am Introduction to Electronic Data Collection Using Android Tablets
and SurveyCTO
- Tablet and App Interface
Razin Iqbal Kabir
23
- Electronic Data Collection and Monitoring Protocols
10:31 am 10:45 am Tea break
10:46 am 12:30 pm Reviewing Questionnaire Modules as they appear on Android
Tablets
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
12:31 pm 1:30 pm Lunch break
1:31 pm 2:00 pm Formal Welcome from Chief Guests from MFSP’s PMU Md. Rezaul Karim Sheikh
Prof. Zahurul Karim
Prof. Fakhrul Islam
Dr. Mohammad Yunus
Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
2:01 pm 3:30 pm Engineering Concepts Revised: Taking and Reporting
Measurements
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
3:31 pm 4:00 pm DISCUSSION / Q&A
4:01 pm 4:15 pm Tea break
4:16 pm 5:00 pm Logistics Handover for Field Pre-Test Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
Day 3: Wednesday, July 19, 2017
FIELD PRE-TEST AT TEJGAON CSD (ALL-DAY)
Day 4: Thursday, July 20, 2017
Time Topic Speakers/Facilitators
9:30 am 11:00 am Recap of Day 3 Field Pre-Test Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
11:01 am 11:15 am Tea break
11:16 am 1:00 pm Field Planning and Logistics Handover for Field Work Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
1:01 pm 2:00 pm Lunch
2:01 pm 2:30 pm Closing Session Mr. Tofazzal Hossain
Engr. Md. Abu Bakar
Razin Iqbal Kabir
24
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE IFPRI is a CGIAR Research Center | A world free of hunger and malnutrition
1201 Eye Street, NW | Washington, DC 20005-3915 USA T: +1.202.862.5600 | F: +1.202.862.5606
Email: [email protected] | www.ifpri.org
This publication has been prepared as an outreach output. It has not been peer reviewed. Any opinions stated herein are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily representative of or endorsed by the International Food Policy Research Institute.
Copyright remains with the authors. To obtain permission to republish, contact [email protected].
To obtain permission to republish, contact [email protected].
Integrated Food Policy Research Program (IFPRP) Office:
Level 8, Plot No: 11, Road No: 11, Block: K, Banani, Dhaka. Tel: +88 01966.677.0022 ; +88.02.550.42464; Email: [email protected]
