Upload
votu
View
239
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1 of 17
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST ARMS & HIGH MAST LIGHT POLES
INSPECTONS IN MIAMI DADE COUNTY
FM #410568-4-72-02
SCOPE OF SERVICE
Table of Contents
1.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION…………………………………………………………………2~3
2.0 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS ………………………………………………………….3~4
3.0 FIELD INSPECTION ………………………………………………………………………4~6
4.0 INSPECTION REPORT…………………………………………………………………….6
4.1 BrM Inspection Report ……………………………………………………………...6
4.2 Comprehensive Report of Deficiencies …………………………………………….7
4.3 Evaluation of Previous Corrective Action ………………………………………….8
4.4 Recommended Corrective Action …………………………………………………..8
4.5 Photograph Inventory ……………………………………………………………….8~9
4.6 Location Maps ………………………………………………………………………9
4.7 Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) ………………………………9
5.0 QUALITY CONTTROL …………………………………………………………………...9
5.1 Quality Reviews ……………………………………………………………………9
5.2 Quality Records …………………………………………………………………....10
5.3 Quality Assurance Plan ……………………………………………………………10~11
6.0 WORK SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS REPORT ……………………………………...11
6.1 Notice to Proceed Meeting …………………………………………………………11
6.2 Work Schedule ……………………………………………………………………..11
6.3 Progress Reports ……………………………………………………………………11
7.0 METHOD OF COMPENSATION………………………………………………………….12
8.0 PUBLICATIONS …………………………………………………………………………..12~13
9.0 ATTACHMENT “A” ………………………………………………………………………13
10.0 ATTACHMENT “B”……………………………………………………………………….14
11.0 ATTACHMENT “C”……………………………………………………………………….15
Page 2 of 15
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST ARMS & HIGH MAST LIGHT POLE
INSPECTIONS IN MIAMI DADE COUNTY
Description: To perform routine and emergency inspection including reporting and minor remedial actions on Traffic Signal Mast Arms and High Mast Light Poles on the State Highway System in Miami-Dade County.
Total of Structures to Inspect: (the total amount will be updated at the end of the current
cycle)
Traffic Mast Arms Regular MBI………. 4,000 Mast Arms at 1,300 Intersections Traffic Mast Arms Initial Inspections……90 Mast Arms at 30 Intersections High Mast Light Poles Regular MBI ..................... 90 poles High Mast Light Poles Initial Inspections ............. 10 poles
1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
1.1 The Consultant shall perform Routine, Initial and Emergency inspection including reporting and minor remedial actions of Traffic Signal Mast Arms (TSMA) & High Mast Light Poles (HMLP) on State Highway System in Miami-Dade County.
1.2 This is a structural inspection of the traffic signal mast arms and high mast light, they will not include items related to functioning of the traffic signal. Mast Arm is a Structure that cantilevers over traffic with a single mast arm. The primary components are the foundation, the base plate, anchor rods, pole to base plate connection, pole, mast arm to pole connection and mast arm. High Mast is a structure supporting light. The primary components are the foundation, base plate, anchor rods, pole to base plate connection, pole and luminaries. High mast poles also have a luminary raising devise and generally a slip joint (or more) in the post. The foundation, electrical ground, anchor rods, base plate, pole, moment connection, splice plates, shall receive hands on inspection. The mast arm horizontal member (arm) and the high light, pole top and the luminaries may be inspected using binoculars, with on hand on inspection if problem areas are detected.
1.3 The consultant will develop all the inspection report using the Department’s Bridge Management System BrM
1.4 All Mast Arms in each intersection have one structural alpha numeric DOT number (6 characters plus one consecutive digit) the “Attachment A” shows how to do it. Also, each intersection has the corresponding Dade County ID #. Each High Mast Light Poles have one structural alpha numeric DOT number (6 characters). If the structural number is not clear legible; it will be repainted. The photo of each structural number should be added to report. The TSMA Dade
Page 3 of 15
County ID # is going to be printed in the Inspection Report, not painted in the field.
1.5 The TSMA and HMLP inspection frequency is 60 months (5 years). The Department intends to spread evenly the total amount of inspections in 60 months
(5 years). The Department has the option to have a Mast Arm Structure inspected
more frequently based on the condition of the Mast Arm or High Mast Light Pole.
1.6 The consultant will perform (1) one full inspection cycle.
2. PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
2.1 An inspection team will consist of a Team Leader and an Assistant. Due to the
extent of welded members found in most ancillary structures, it desirable for at least one team member to have experience in visual weld inspection as well as
training in locating and recognizing fatigue cracking. The Team Leader should be
confirmed officially by the Department as a Certified Bridge Inspector.
Qualifications for Certification as a Bridge Inspector as stated in the Rules of the Florida Department of Transportation, Chapter 1448.07. A qualified inspector must
be in the field to supervise inspection activities at all times. To be qualified, an
individual should be “CBI” or must be registered as a Professional Engineer in
Florida and experienced in the inspection of Bridge Structures according to the National Bridge Inspection Standard.
2.2 Each final Traffic Signal Mast Arm and High Mast Light Pole inspection report
shall be signed by the field bridge inspector and signed and sealed in accordance
with the Florida Statue 471.025 b y the Professional Engineer, which confirms the
accuracy and completeness of all the report contents.
2.3 An organizational chart shall be submitted to the Department for approval prior to starting work. The organization chart shall include the number and names of key
personnel, team size, and which individuals are assigned to the various work tasks.
Any changes from the original organization chart must be submitted to the
Department's Project Manager for approval. The notification must be in writing within seven (7) calendar days of the change.
2.4 Each final inspection report shall be sealed in accordance with Florida Statute
471.025 by the Professional Engineer, which confirms the accuracy and
completeness of all the report contents.
2.5 Due to the nature and scope of the require services, it may be desire for the
consultant to subcontract portions of the work (i.e. scanning). The consultant shall be authorized to subcontract these services under the provision of this document.
2.6 Subcontracting firms and the work they will perform shall be identified in the
original proposal. The subcontracting firm must be approved in writing and
Page 4 of 15
qualified by the Department prior to initiation of any work. The percentage of total contract work performed by the subcontractor shall not exceed fifty percent (50%).
Any changes in the subcontracting firms or the work they will perform as indicated
in the consultant’s proposal shall be subject to review and approval by the
Department.
3. FIELD INSPECTION
3.1 Field inspection must be conducted in accordance with the publications listed in
this scope. The Professional Engineer or Certified Bridge Inspector on site
shall be responsible for the detection of all deficiencies and the determination and
recording of the structure’s conditions which must include the personal inspection of all significant deficiencies. This individual is also responsible for assuring the
accuracy and completeness of all data records compiled as a result of the
Consultant’s field activity. This individual as also responsible for insuring that mast
arm numbers are in place and legible on each Traffic Signal Mast Arm and High Mast Light Pole.
3.2 Every visible surface of all members of each Traffic Signal Mast Arm and High
Mast Light Pole structure must be examined. Members that cannot be examined
because of debris, vegetation, etc. should be cleaned if the effort involved is not
excessive. Excessive effort is the one that would require more than two (2) hours
for the inspection team to perform. The Department Project Manager should be
consulted prior to any major cleaning operation. Members and elements that
cannot be inspected prior to report publication must be documented in the report
as such, along with the reason for not inspecting.
3.3 Where deficiency dimensions are documented, the actual width, length and location
on the member should be recorded. In cases where dimensioning every deficiency
is impractical, the standards Department Table of Deficiency Dimension Classes,
must be used in lieu of undefined general term, such as narrow, fine, etc.
3.4 If by field observation, deficiencies are sufficiently critical to warrant immediate
and substantial traffic restrictions, or present an imminent hazard to the public; the
Department Project Manager or designated representative must be immediately
verbally notified. Verbal notification must be confirmed with written notification
within 24 hours.
3.5 As a safety precaution the Department recommends that all inspection personnel
utilize a personal non-contact AC voltage detector to check for the presence of
errant current in TSMAs during inspections.
3.6 Traffic control procedures must be in accordance with the FHWA/USDOT Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the Department’s Roadway and Traffic
Design Standards. All LCR must be requested 14 working days prior to the closure
date.
Page 5 of 15
3.7 As part of the inspection procedures all loose anchor bolt jam nuts, lock nuts and
leveling nuts (when accessible) will be tightened in accordance with Department
standards, documented in the inspection report
3.8 A hands-on inspection of the entire length of the vertical (surface area and welds) is
required. A hands-on inspection of the upper connection(s) will include all welds,
plates, and fasteners and that portion of the horizontal arm(s) that can be reached
without extending over traffic lanes. The inspection of the remainder of the
horizontal (arm/arms) will be performed on the entire perimeter of the horizontal
arm with vision enhancing equipment (binoculars) of sufficient quality, resolution
and magnification to detect small deficiencies in the mast arm sections. Special
attention will be given to the slip joint (if present) for any indication of stress,
cracking, galvanizing overlay or deterioration (missing fasteners, corrosion
staining, movement, etc.). Deficient paint systems will also be reported. If
significant deficiencies of any kind other than missing slip joint fasteners are
suspected or detected, a hands-on inspection will be required.
3.9 MAINTENANCE ITEMS TO BE HANDLED DURING INSPECTIONS
The Certified Bridge Inspector will be responsible to perform the following
maintenance activities as part of the inspection.
3.9.1 Painting of Structural Components with Cold Galvanizing: The inspectors
will clean and paint only primary structural elements if any corrosion is
found on the structure. Electrical components will not be painted. The
painting will be limited to a maximum of 2 square feet per sign or 4
separate areas (totaling less than 2 square feet per sign). Cold Galvanizing
will be supplied by FDOT.
3.9.2 Missing or loose Anchor Bolt Nuts: Any loose or missing anchor nuts
and/or jam nut discovered during inspection shall be provided and tightened
using torque wrench fulfilling the FDOT standards. No work order will be
issued for tightened nuts. Anchor bolt nuts will be supplied by FDOT.
3.9.3 U-Bolts: Any loose U-bolts discovered during inspection shall be tightened
using torque wrench fulfilling the FDOT standards.
3.9.4 Miscellaneous Bolts (Excluding Anchor Bolts): Any loose, broken or
missing bolts discovered by the inspection shall be replaced and/or
tightened using torque wrench fulfilling the FDOT standards. When
potential failure condition exist that could endanger the traffic bellow, the
structure should be considered as critical. In the situation, the Department
Project Manager must be notified immediately so that appropriate action
can be taken.
3.9.5 Loose High Strength Bolts: Loose high strength bolts (at the moment
connectors, box section connectors, and primary element connections) will
be tightened to the extent possible by the inspector, but will not be tightened
to a specified torque value. This information will be documented in the
Page 6 of 15
element inspection notes in the report. See District Six Policies on page 13
of the scope.
3.9.6 Missing High Strength Bolts and Nuts: The inspectors will not replace
missing high strength bolts and nuts, but the inspector will obtain the
required size of the missing fasteners to be documented in the element
inspection notes in the report. See District Six Policies on page 9 of the
scope.
3.9.7 Missing and Loose Sign Panel and Sign Backing Connection Bolts: The
inspector will tighten loose sign panel and sign backing bolts. Inspector
will replace all missing sign fasteners if accessible and not an excessive
effort. Fasteners will be supplied by FDOT.
4. INSPECTION REPORT
4.1 BrM Inspection Report
The consultant will develop all inspection reports utilizing the latest version of
BrM. The report will contain all documentation specified by this agreement and
must meet the requirements of the Manual for Bridge and Other Structures
Inspection and Reporting Procedures. Any addendum to the report shall be
converted to a pdf file and stored in BrM. The Consultant must develop, publish
and submit a report for each structure.
The report must be sign and sealed by the registered Professional Engineer.
The Bridge Management System database will be updated with the new inspection
date within 30 days after the inspection is completed. The inspection report will be
completed within 60 days of the completion of the field inspection.
“Inspection Date: (90)” Should be opened in BrM the same calendar month that
is due previous inspection.
Database will be updated in 30 days ..................... day 30
Final Revision, Sign & Seal in 5 days ................. day 35
Department approval or return error 10 days ........ day 45
Resubmitted fixed in 15 days ................................ day 60
4.1.1 Within sixty (60) days after completion of each inspection, the consultant
shall furnish the Department with the original of each inspection report. All
inspection reports must be uploaded to EDMS.
4.1.2 Each inspection report shall be a stand-alone document. Letter size paper
shall not be used for reports.
Page 7 of 15
4.1.3 Deficiencies described in previous inspection reports must be addressed again
in the current report. Terminology not commonly understood by non-
inspection personnel should be minimized and undefined values or rating
shall not be used. An inspection report must provide a comprehensive
description of all deficiencies and state probable causes of the deficiencies,
specific required correction action and contain an evaluation of any
previous corrective action. Any deficiency that cannot be described in BrM
should be addressed in an addendum and will be attached to the report.
4.1.4 Reports must have a close numbering system, with the total number of
pages in the report shown on each page, for example, Page 10 of 17.
4.2 Comprehensive Report of Deficiencies
4.2.1 Deficiencies shall be reported in the same numerical order as they appear in
the inspection report and shall be indexed by the element number. Under
each element subheading all deficiencies and their causes shall be reported
referencing ant attached sketches and photograph by number.
4.2.2 This section shall contain a brief but comprehensive description of the
deficiencies. The probable cause of deficiencies should also be identified.
Identifying the probable cause of the deficiencies serves two purposes;
first, the most effective repair can only be determined if the source of the
deficiency has been identified; second, when the same cause for a specific
deficiency is documented repeatedly, a body of evidence becomes
available to justify its elimination through a change in design.
4.2.3 Deficiencies shall be described in enough detail to allow rates of change to be
monitor over consecutive inspections. This requires liberal use of size and
location dimensions, sketches and photographs. A sketch illustrates only the
essential features of a deficiency without distracting detail and whenever it
is more effective, a sketch shall be used in lieu of a photograph.
4.2.4 Photograph shall be used only when a sketch is not practical or to illustrate
one typical example of a severe and/or common type of deficiencies,
photographs illustrating a typical example must be taken. When photograph
is taken, an object that provides a sense of scale such as a ruler should
always be included in the photograph. The date the photograph was taken
and the mast arm number shall always be marked on the front. Photograph
shall be taken in color. Color frequently adds significantly to the effective
description of a deficiency. When photographs are included in the report,
each copy of the report submitted to the Department shall include a color
print of each photograph. All photographs should be part of the inspection
report.
Page 8 of 15
5.2.5 The consultant shall research documentation for recording mast arms
identification data, the date erected, date manufactured erector and
manufacturer.
4.3 Evaluation of Previous Corrective Action
The purpose of this section is to evaluate the effectiveness of repairs that were
performed since the previous inspection. Repairs recommended in previous
inspection but not completed shall be addressed in the Recommended Corrective
Action Section. Each repair should be inspected carefully to determine if the repair
effectively corrected the deficiency. The written evaluation of each repair should be
presented in this section.
4.4 Recommended Corrective Action
4.4.1 This section shall contain all deficiencies requiring maintenance, repairs, or
rehabilitation with recommended corrective action for each deficiency
without addressing methods, quantities, or cost of such action. All
deficiencies identified shall be included in this section if only to note that
no corrective action is required.
4.4.2 Deficiencies serious enough to cause a current or imminent traffic safety
hazard must be flagged in the left margin with the word “CRITICAL” in
capital letters adjacent to the element number. The following items are
considered critical deficiencies:
4.4.3 Cracks or fatigue related deficiencies in fracture critical structural members.
4.4.4 Deficiencies that require immediate attention and are deemed critical must be
signed by the register Professional Engineer.
4.4.5 When reporting missing, loose or corroded nuts and bolts always provide the
deficient quantity, size and the total quantity (Example: 2-inch leveling nut
on anchor bolt #3 is loose).
4.5 Photograph Inventory
Certain mast arm features can best be determined by examining a photograph. The
photographic views shall be provided by the consultant for each mast arm to insure
adequate reference: the entire mast arm elevation on both faces (on several
photographs, if required) including foundations, anchor bolts, typical splice
moment connection, structure number, columns and arms. All photographs
should be labeled with the structure number, view, and feature, date taken and
attached to Mast Arm Report. A general profile intersection photo in the direction
Page 9 of 15
of the inventory should be incorporated in the inspection report. The photographer
should avoid the backlighting
4.6 Location Map
The consultant will provide each inspection report with the structure location maps
for the purpose to illustrate the physical location of each structure.
4.7 Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)
The consultant shall provide personnel proficient in the use of computers and
scanner operation to input related inspection documents into an Electronic
Document Management System (EDMS) within fifteen (15) calendar days of the
final report submittal. This will require familiarity with the Structures
Management Documents guidelines for EDMS posted on the FDOT Infonet and
the District 6 EDMS Naming Conventions and Attribution document. Duties will
include scanning and attributing documents in the Department's Electronic
Document Management System. Documents imported into the EDMS will be in
PDF format. Documents such as inspection reports and photo inventories that are
created in BrM will be downloaded from BrM. This effort should be included into
the cost of scheduled inspections and payment will not occur until this is
completed to the Department PM's satisfaction.
5. QUALITY CONTROL
The consultant shall institute quality assurance procedures, which shall be provided in
writing to the Department for review and approval before work begins. Quality assurance
procedures are an integral part of this contract and are not a separate pay item. The
Department may perform additional quality assurance by inspecting mast arms that have
been previously inspected by the consultant and reviewing the inspection records for
conformity with the Department’s finding.
5.1 Quality Reviews
5.1.1 The consultant shall conduct quality reviews to make certain his own
organization is in compliance with the requirements cited in the scope of
services. Quality reviews shall evaluate the adequacy of materials,
documentation, processes, procedures, training, guidance, and staffing
included in the execution of this contract.
5.1.2 The Quality Assurance Program should also have a second, peer review level.
The peer review can be conducted internally by the consultant’s
organization or by subcontracting the review to another consulting firm
Page 10 of 15
5.2 Quality Records
The consultant shall maintain adequate records of quality assurance actions
performed by this organization (including subcontractors and vendors) in providing
services and products under this contract. All records shall indicate the nature and
number of observations made, the number and type of deficiencies found, and the
corrective actions taken. These records shall be kept at the primary office and shall
be available to the Department for audit review during the contract term.
5.3 Quality Assurance Plan
5.3.1 The Consultant is responsible for creating and maintaining a quality control
plan. The Project Manager for the different structures inspection contracts
is responsible to ensure that the Consultant has a written quality control
plan, in place, and shall visit the Consultant Office for verification,
quarterly.
5.3.2 Furthermore, the Project Manager or designee is responsible to conduct a
quality assurance of the inspections performed by the Consultant, during
field operations, for review of their inspection sequence, thoroughness and
completeness, on a quarterly basis. Also, the Project Manager shall verify
the accuracy of the overhead sign inspection reports and comprehensive
inventory data reports of at least 5% of the structures inspected by the
Consultant. In addition, when there is an irregular change in the NBI
ratings, i.e. dropping more than 2 points or below 5, or when the sufficiency
ratings change drastically (more than 10 points or falls below 50), from the
previous inspection, the structures maintenance office performs a quality
assurance field review to concur with the findings. The Project Manager
creates and maintains a separate file with all the quality assurance
documentation performed on the Consultants.
5.3.3 The Project Manager is responsible for reviewing 100% of the reports
generated by consultants. The Project Manager is responsible for creating
and maintaining a separate folder, per consultant contract, with all the QA
/ QC sheets of all structure inspection reports.
5.3.4 This office will perform a yearly visit to consultant office to review their
plan and QA/QC activities records. In addition, this office will conduct
5% field reviews of the structures inspected within that year review. This
field review is intended to verify the accuracy of the information
collected by the inspection team performing the inspection. A yearly
report will be created containing findings from the office review and field
reviews. Finally, this office will run BrM reports on a monthly basis to
detect any validation error and any delinquent inspection.
5.3.5 The Department may hold short (1/2 day) training sessions for all
bridge inspectors biannually, informing them of changes that have been
Page 11 of 15
made in inspection and/or reporting procedures. The Consultant’s
inspectors are required to attend.
6. WORK SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS REPORT
6.1 Notice to Proceed Meeting
6.1.1 The Department shall conduct a Notice to precede meeting after the
consultant has received the Notice to Proceed letter from the Department.
This meeting will include but will not be limited to the following personnel;
1. Department’s Project Manager, 2. Department Professional Services
Administrator, 3. Consultant Project Manager and Consultant Deputy
Project Manager.
6.1.2 The Department will explain the financial and administrative details of the
contractor, establish any ground rules upon which the work be conducted,
and transfer materials to be furnished by the Department.
6.1.3 The Consultant will provide the Department with a written quality control
procedure, a proposed work schedule, an organization chart, and a
proposed cost flow graph.
6.2 Work Schedule
6.2.1 Using the last Inspection date recorded in BrM and the Initial Inspections
programmed, the work schedule shall be established in a manner that will
insure that mast arm inspection will not be delinquent. This schedule shall
show how
the consultant anticipates the work progress from month to month to
completion of the agreement. All inspections will be performed within the
same calendar month that they are due.
6.2.2 Penalties: $ 1,000.00 will be subtracted from the Invoice by each delinquent
structure per day.
6.2.3 The proposed work schedule, cost flow graph, quality control procedure,
organization chart, and the list of major equipment the consultant will use
during the mast arm inspection shall be included with the Consultant’s
proposal. The list of major equipment shall indicate if the Consultant owns
the equipment and, if not, his plan for obtaining the equipment.
6.3 Progress Reports
6.3.1 Progress reports shall be delivered to the Department currently with the
monthly invoice. Accumulated project cost will also be reported.
Page 12 of 15
7. METHOD OF COMPENSATION
7.1 Compensation will be unit completed at loaded billing rate by “tasks” approved in
the agreement.
7.2 Each “task” will be calculated by mast arm and the type of work to be performed.
The final cost of each intersection will be determinate by the total Mast Arms in the
intersection or by each Light Pole.
7.3 Concurrent with support progress reports, the Consultant shall submit the invoice
using the Consultant Invoice Transmittal System (CITS). Work Progress reports
may be submitted by EMAIL to the Department on an Excel Spread Sheet.
7.4 The fee for the tasks items shall be based on the contract unit per occurrence for the
following:
1- Initial Inspection & Report.
2- Regular NBI Insp. & Report.
3- Special-Accident Damage Insp. & Report.
4- Special-Natural Damage Insp. & Report.
5- Special Inspection & Report.
8. PUBLICATIONS
All inspection shall be conducted in accordance with the following state and
national publications covering bridge inspection standards of practice:
National Bridge Inspection Standards Code of Federal Regulations 23, Part 650, Subpart
C.
Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway
Administration (UDOT/FHWA)
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (USDOT / FHWA)
Page 13 of 15
Inspection of Fractural Critical Bridge Members FHWA-IP-86026.
Guidelines for the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance & repair of Structural Supports for
Highway Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals U.S. Department of
Transportation/Federal Highway Administration (USDOT / FHWA)
Page 14 of 15
9. ATTACHMENTS
9.1. ATTACH “A”
Intersection Type & Intersection, Mast Arm & Component Numerical System.