Upload
trinhkhue
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)
High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)
High Speed Rail versus Road
Pricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
1981
1989
1990
1996
20012001
19921994
19931994
1994 & 1996
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
37,2
2000 2001
1530
24,8
1996
1280
20,5
1994
1250
18,9
1993
1080 km
19,0
1992
730
14,9
1990
690
11,5
1989
Length of the high speed network (km)5905,3
0,61983
410
1981
293
High Speed Traffic
(billio
n Pass - km)
The traffic growth is in direct relationship with the network extension
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Valençay
OloronBuzy
Chars
Vernon
BarentinYvetot
Tarascon
Chagny
Livron
Moirans
Morcenx
Marmande
Marne-la-Vallée - Chessy
Lyon Part Dieu
Avignon
Brest MorlaixGuingamp
St BrieucLamballe
Landerneau
Dol
Rennes
RedonVannes
Auray
Lorient
Savenay
Nantes
Vitré
Laval
Le MansSablé
Angers
La Rochelle
Niort
Arcachon
Bordeaux Libourne
Périgueux
Brive
Mont-de-Marsan
Dax
Bayonne
Pau
Lourdes
Tarbes
Toulouse
Perpignan
Carcassonne
Narbonne
Béziers
Montpellier
Millau
AlbiMontauban
AgenRodez
Aurillac
Neussargues
Le Monastier
Tulle
Ussel
Limoges
Angoulême
Poitiers
Guéret
Montluçon
Le Puy-en-Velay
St-Étienne
Riom
Volvic
Gannat Vichy
Châtellerault
Vendôme-TGV
Tours
Châteaudun
ChartresAlençon
Surdon Dreux
Argentan
VireGranville
Pontorson
Avranches
CoutancesSt-Lo
Lison
Carentan
Cherbourg
CaenLisieux
Trouville
Dives
Le Havre
Fécamp
Rouen
Dieppe
Gisors
Évreux Mantes
Cholet
La Roche/Yon
Thouars
Saumur
ChinonPornic
St-Gilles-Croix-de-Vie
Les Sables-d'Olonne
RuffecRochefort
SaintesRoyan
Pointede Grave
Montmorillon
Châteauroux
Bourges
Vierzon
Blois
Orléans
Étampes
Le Tréport
Serqueux
St-Omer
AbbevilleArras
Lens
Béthune
Hazebrouck
Boulogne
Calais-Frethun
Dunkerque
DouaiValenciennes
Hirson
Maubeuge
Laon
Charleville-Mézières
Sedan
Longuyon
Longwy
Rethel
Tergnier
Compiègne Soissons
Longueau
Creil
Beauvais
Pontoise
MassyTGV
Arvant
La Bastide
Roanne
Givors
Valence
Alès
Nîmes
Arles
Miramas
Marseille
Orange
Hyères
GapEmbrun
Briançon
Grenoble
Aspres
Montélimar
St-Avre-la-Chambre
St-Michel-Valloire
ModaneSt-Jean-de-Maurienne
Albertville
Moutiers-Salins
Bourg-St-Maurice
St-Gervais-les-Bains
Cluses
Annecy
Aix-les-Bains
Culoz
Bourg-en-B.Annemasse
MâconTGV
Mâcon
Mouchard
Lons-le-Saunier
Montargis
Gien
Cosne/Loire
Nevers
Montchanin
Autun
Auxerre
Sens
Laroche-Migennes
Montbard
Dijon
Culmont-Chalindrey
Chaumont
Troyes
ProvinsSt-Dizier
Vitry-le-François
Bar-le-DucToul
NancyLunéville
Vesoul
Belfort
Sélestat
Colmar
Mulhouse
Montbéliard
Besançon
Épinal
Lure
Beaune
Le CreusotTGV
St-Amour
Dole
PontarlierFrasne
Moulins/Allier
Paray-le-Monial
Lyon PerracheLyonSaint ExupéryTGV
SarregueminesForbach
AéroportCharles-de-Gaulle TGV Châlons
-en-ChampagneÉpernay
ReimsThionville
Metz
Valence TGV
Agde
SèteCastelnaudary
Castelsarrasin
Orthez
Surgères
St-Maixent
Courtalain
Ancenis
St-Nazaire
Le Croisic
Rosporden
Quimperlé
Lille Europe
Ambérieu
Versailles
Melun
Valognes
Bayeux
BernayMézidon
Eu
Gournay
Châteaubriant
Hendaye
Irun
Cognac
Cahors
Auch
St-Jean-Pied-de-Port
Luchon
Lannemezan
Bressuire
Loches
Argenton/Creuse
Souillac
CerbèrePort-BouLa Tour-de-Carol
Enveitg
Dinan
St-Malo
Vendôme
Biarritz
Foix
Le Mont-Dore
Clermont-Ferrand
Bâle
Conflans-Jarny
LonguevilleBar/Aube
Langres
Sarrebourg
Molsheim
St Dié
Remiremont
La Ferté-Gaucher
Hagondange
Rémilly
Verdun
Étaples-Le Touquet
TGVHaute-Picardie
St-Quentin
CambraiAulnoye
Amiens
Mazamet
Séverac-le-Château
CapdenacFigeac
Veynes-Dévoluy
Thonon-les-Bains
Montmélian
Chalon/Saône
St-Germain-des-Fossés
Évian-les-Bains
Genève
Salbris
St-Pierre-des-Corps
Château-du-Loir
Quimper
Flers
Briouze
LoudéacCarhaix
Roscoff Lannion Paimpol
Pont-de-Dore
Ligne à grande vitesseLigne classiqueLigne classique empruntéepar les TGV
Clisson
Quiberon
La Baule
B4
TGV Bretagne-Pays de la Loire
2ème phase
POLT en TGV pendulaire
Figueras
Girona
Barcelona
TGV Perpignan-Barcelone
Contournement Nîmes-Montpellier
Chambéry
Bussoleno
Pertuis
Aix-en-P.
Avignon TGV
Les Arcs-Draguignan
St-Raphaël
Antibes
Nice
Cannes
Aix-en-ProvenceTGV
TGV Côte d'Azur Étude d'opportunité
BesançonTGV
Belfort-MontbéliardTGV
BressaneTGV
TGV Rhin-Rhône Branche Est
TGV Rhin-Rhône Branche Sud
Lorraine
Meuse
Champagne-Ardenne
TGV Est Européen 2007
Liaison rapide Normandie - Vallée de Seine
Bellegarde
Liaison transalpine
Modernisation de la ligne du Haut-Bugey
Étude TGV Pendulaire
Barreau Sud
MalesherbesMoret
Sarlat
Monsempron-Libos
Oloron-Ste-Marie
Quillan
BessègesTende
Felletin
Corbigny
Givet
Wissembourg
Futuroscope
Facture
Sisteron
Kehl
Lille Fl.
CalaisVille
ProjetVoyageursFretMixte
Amsterdam
Düsseldorf
London
Luxembourg
Lausane
Madrid
BruxellesKöln
CTRL 1 : 2003 CTRL 2 : 2007
HSL 2006
2006
1ère phase
Toulon
TGV Rhin-Rhône Branche Ouest
FRA/PROJETUDP1.PRZ04/11/2002
DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DÉLÉGUÉE CLIENTÈLESSERVICE DÉVELOPPEMENT
Études ou projets d'ampleur nationale et européenne
Strasbourg
Torino
Menton
Monaco
Lauterbourg
Frankfurt
ÉtudeProjet CDG Express
TGV Sud Europe Atlantique
Many infrastructure projectsare in the offingfor the coming 25 years
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
6h005h004h003h002h001h00
Mulhouse4h31 3h10* 2h30
Évian4h35 4h05
PARIS
Best Travel Times
2003 20072010
20102015
20152020
Chambéry2h40 2h10
Nice5h30 4h35 /3h25
Quimper4h13 3h43 3h00
Marseille3h00Montpellier
3h15 3h00Toulouse5h07 4h42 4h10/ 3h00
Bordeaux2h57 2h25 2h09
Nantes2h01 1h53
Brest4h01 3h31 3h00
Reims1h25 0h45
Strasbourg3h50 2h20 2h00
Metz/Nancy2h45/2h40 1h30
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
6h005h004h003h002h001h00
Bâle4h50 3h30 2h49
Stuttgart5h55 3h50 3h30
Amsterdam4h10 3h10
Francfort5h35 3h45 3h25Cologne
3h56 3h36 3h00
Genève3h34 3h00
PARIS
sources : DGDC & TGV Est
Munich8h20 6h00 5h40
Milan6h50 5h28 4h02
Turin5h23 4h53 3h15
Barcelone8h25 5h50 5h35 5h00
Madrid13h00 8h15 8h00 7h25
Londres3h00 2h10
Bruxelles1h25
Luxembourg3h35 2h15
Best Travel Times
2003 20072010
20102015
20152020
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)
Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)
High Speed Rail versus Road
Pricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
OriginCity
DestinationCity
Generalised Cost (Rail)= Price (Rail)+ h*Travel Time (Rail)GCRail = P Rail+ h*TRail
Generalised Cost (Air)= Price (Air)+ h*Travel Time (Air)GCAir = P Air+ h*TAir
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Graph 1People whose Time Value is hidon ’t care about the mode
Graph 2People whose Time Valueis less than hi are rail travellers
% (split of travellersaccording to their time value)
PassengersTime Value
TravelGeneralised Cost
GCAir
GCRail
hi hi
Rail marketshare
Air marketshare
PRail
PAir
PassengersTime Value
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Graph 3Train acceleration and change in the equilibrium
Graph 4Traffic transfer from Air to Rail
GCAir
GCRail 0
hi0 hi0
Gains in marketshares
PRail
PAir
TravelGeneralised Cost
PassengersTime Value
PassengersTime Value
GCRail 1
hi1 hi1
% (split of travellersaccording to their time value)
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
T i j =
K * Emai * Attb j
Gcc i j
T Traffic on the (ij) OD pairK Constant factorEm Caracteristic of the Emission zoneAtt Caracteristic of the Attraction zoneGc Generalized cost of transport between zones i & j
Gc = f (travel time, access and egress times, average price, number of connections, service frequency)
Gravity model
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
% of Night Traffic
Travel Time (hours)
100%
0%1h 2h 3h 4h 5h 6h 7h 8h
The percentage of night traffic is evaluatedthanks to a “S” line function of the day travel time by train
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)
Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)
High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)High Speed Rail versus Road
Pricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Aéroport Taxi Temps de trajet Train Express / bus* Temps de trajet
Londres centre
City* 105 € 20mn 9 € 30mn
Heathrow 105 € 45mn 18 € 15mn
Gatwick 135 € 1h00 27 € 30mn
Luton 135 € 1h00 15 € 30mn
Stansted 135 € 1h10 20 € 45mn
Paris centre
Roissy CDG de 40 € à 55 € 35-45mn 7,70 € (1) 8,20 € (2) 30mn (1) /45-60mn (2)
Easyjet
Lowest price 22€Airport tax 15 €Roissy-Paris RER ticket (38km) or Taxi from 8 € to 55 €Lutton - London by Express train or Taxi from15 € to 135 €
Total one way from 60 € to 227 €Total return trip from 120 € to 113.5 €
Eurostar
Lowest price 69 €
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Commissioning of the CTRL1
Without the CTRL1 With the CTRL1
Number of Eurostar ticketsweek by week
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1 h 2 h 3 h 4 h 5 h 6 h 7 h 8 h 9 h 10 h 11 h 12 h 13 h
Rail market shareon the rail+air market
Best rail travel time (h)
Confidence rangefor the rail market share
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
-40,00%
-30,00%
-20,00%
-10,00%
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
mars-01
avr-01
mai-01
juin-01
juil-01
août-01
sept-01
oct-01
nov-01
déc-01
janv-02
févr-02
mars-02
avr-02
mai-02
juin-02
juil-02
août-02
sept-02
oct-02
nov-02
déc-02
Evo
luti
on
(%
)
Evolution of air traffic volumebetweenParis and Marseilles
month M -Y/month M (Y-1)
Mediterranean TGV Commissioning
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Market shares on the Rail+Air marketon the Madrid-Sevilla OD pair
0,00%
20,00%
40,00%
60,00%
80,00%
100,00%
120,00%
Air 76,30 79,30 48,40 18,40 20,00 18,80 18,40 18,50 18,80 17,10 16,60 15,80 15,90
Rail 23,70 20,70 51,60 81,60 80,00 81,20 81,60 81,50 81,20 82,90 83,40 84,20 84,10
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)
Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)
High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)
High Speed Rail versus RoadPricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
The best strategy against roadis to increase the service frequency.
High speed trains are aptto be operated like shuttles.
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
OmiyaTakasaki
è The time table is based on departuresevery 4 to 12 minutesbetween Tokyo and Omiya and Takasakifrom 6AM to 11 PM.
"ASAHI" (Tokyo - Niigata)
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
è 27 departures a day from Roama to Firence
- A train every 30 minutes from 6h55 to 22h55.
- The 246 km distance between the 2 citiesare run at the commercial speed of 250km/h withatravel time of 1h35
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
è 28 trains a day betweenParis and Brussels
a departure every 30 minutes
from 6h25 to 22h31
with a 1h25 trip duration
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Car75,9%
Coach3,7%
Others2,7%
Air3,2%
Rail14,5%
Modal Mix for trips longer than 100 km in France
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Modal split on the Madrid-Sevilla marketbefore the commissioning of the AVE
60%14%
11%
15%
car Conventional trainairbus
34%
2%4%8%
52%
car
Conventional trainairbusAVE
Modal split on the Madrid-Sevilla marketafter the commissioning of the AVE
The car has lost more than 40%of its market share
The air has lost more than 60%of its market share
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)
Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)
High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)
High Speed Rail versus Road
Pricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Services available on board the high speed trainsServices proposés SNCF DB
Premium 1ère classe Club Preferente ETR 500 ETR 460/480 ETR 450Catering at the seat X* X X XGlass of welcome X X* X* X* X* X*Snack meal X* X* X*Newspapers X X X X X* X* X*Bar / Cafeteria / restaurant X X X X X XMobile grocery XVideo X X XAudio (4 musical channels) X X X X XGames for childrenCloakroom X X2
On board telephone X X XParking (i) X XTaxi booking X XAccess to club lobby X1 X* X* X* X X XBaby wraping facilitiesCommodities for disabled people X XCompartments dedicated to parents with children XElectric plugs X X X XMobile stations XDedicated Business compartments X X* Included in the 1st class ticket price1 Free for SNCF "grand voayageurs"2 in ICE 3
RENFE FS
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Price ranges based on the same GNP level Price ranges
140 138131
2620 24
41 44
109
9287
103
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Paris Lyon WürzburgHanovre
StuttgartKöln
MadridSéville
MadridLérida V300
En €
140
114108
3526 22 26
34 36
110
909593 92
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Paris Lyon WürzburgHanovre
StuttgartKöln
MadridSéville
MadridLéridaV300
En €
1ère Classe PT +
1ère Classe PT
Prem's
2de classe TR maxi
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
PDM du fersupérieur à 90%
PDM du fersupérieur à 85%
Price ranges for 2-hour high speed trip duration
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
Introduction (France as an example)
Traffic forecasts (modelling techniques)
High Speed Rail versus Air (modal competition)
High Speed Rail versus Road
Pricing High Speed ServicesAs a matter of conclusion
July 8th, 2004
Traffic Forecasts and Marketing forHigh Speed Train Services
A high speed line
Can be run at higher speeds
Is shorter Brings additionalinfrastructure capacity
Better productivitySaved time
More service frequency
Possibility to reduce the fares
More attractiveness on the passenger market