12
Tracking Secondary AVID Students into Higher Education FY2009 H.S. Graduates

Tracking Secondary AVID Students into Higher Educationfy2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Tracking Secondary AVID Students into Higher Education

FY2009 H.S. Graduates

SES by AVID Participation

60%

36% 33%37%

61%66%

3% 2% 1%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Yearsof AVID

No EconomicDisadvantage

Economic Disadvantage

UnKnown

The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 Texas Public H.S. graduates who did not participate in AVID.

Ethnic Origin by AVID Participation

14%

25% 28%

4% 2% 3%

44%

14%9%

38%

58% 60%

* * *0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Yearsof AVID

African-American

Asian

European-American

Hispanic

Native American

The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.

At-Risk Status by AVID Participation

42%50%

45%

54%48%

55%

3% 2% 1%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Years ofAVID

At-Risk

Not At-Risk

UnKnown

The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.

H.S. Diploma Type by AVID Participation

12%9% 11%

70%

85% 87%

15%

6%2%3% * *

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Years ofAVID

Distinguished

Recommended

Minimum

IEP

The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.

Typical H.S. Graduate in FY2008

The Typical Non-AVID H.S. Graduate

• European-American

• Not At-Risk (TEA)

• No economic disadvantage

• Received a Recommended H.S. Degree

The Typical AVID H.S. Graduate

• Hispanic

• At-Risk (TEA)

• Economic Disadvantage

• Received a Recommended H.S. Degree

Based the highest percentage in each category.

Tracking AVID Students into Higher Education

• AVID H.S. Graduates were matched to Non-AVID H.S. Graduates on six demographic and 2 assessment variables.– Diploma Type – Gender– SES– Ethnic Origin – At-Risk Status– The ability to track students into H.E.– TAKS ELA scale score– TAKS Math scale score

HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLLMENT AND PERSISTENCE

Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009 by AVID Participation (N=9046)

54% 55%

67%

46% 45%

33%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Years ofAVID

Fall 2009 Enrolled

Unknown

Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graphUnknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher Education

Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009 by AVID Participation by Institution Type (N=9046)

41%45%

53%59%

55%47%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Years ofAVID

Universities

CTC's

Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graphOnly includes students enrolled in H.E. Fall 2009

One Year Persistence by AVID Participation (N=5085)

75% 73%79%

25% 27%21%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Yearsof AVID

One Year Persistence

Unknown

*Only includes students who attended H.E. in Fall 2008 and were tracked to Fall 2009.

Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graphUnknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher education

One Year Persistence by AVID Participation (N=9046, Fall 2009 Unknown students

included)

40% 40%

53%60% 60%

47%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No AVID 2 or less years ofAVID

3 or more Yearsof AVID

Fall to Fall Persistence

Unknown

Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher educationStudents who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graph