181
~ational Library Biblbth6que natQnale ---if 4 qlCanada, du Canada * . /- - -- - . . - - - - - - - -- - , , 4 The quality of this microform is heavilydependent upon the La qualitd de cette microforme dbpknd grandernent de la quality of the original thesis submitted for microfilming. qualit6 de la these soumise au microfrlmage. Nous avons Every effort has beenmade to ensure the highest quality of tout fail pour assurer une qualitb supdrieure de reprodue;. , - reproduction possible. tion. If pa es are mis$ng, contact the university which granted B S'il manque des pages, veuillez cornmuniquer a F c the e,gree. ' , I'universite qui 9 confer6 le grade. /--I Some ages may have indistinct print especial1 if the origina'pages f' were t ped with a poor typewriter ri bon or - if the university sent g s an inferior photocopy. . I ! Previously copyrighted materials (journal articles, pub- , lighed tests, etc.) are not filmed. Reproduction in full or in part of this microform is overned by the Canadian Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1970, c 8-30. . , - - - J. La qualild.d'irnpression de certaines pages,peut laisser A ddsirer, surtout si les pages originales ont 616 dactylogra- phiees A I'aide d'un ruban us6 ou si I]universit6 nous a fat pa~enir une photocopie de qualit6 infbrieure. - - Les documents qui font dejh I'objet d'un droit d'auteur (articles de *revue, tests publibs, etc.) ne sont pas microfilm6s. La reproduction, meme partielie, de cette microforme esl swrnise a la Loi canad~enne sur le droit d'auteur, SRC" 1970, C. C-30

Trace of oil : the search for the initiating factor of the Chaco Warsummit.sfu.ca/system/files/iritems1/5191/b14968885.pdf · 2020. 12. 28. · cia1 deposits of oil were fir'st discovered

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • ~at ional Library Biblbth6que natQnale ---if 4 qlCanada, du Canada * . /-

    - -- -

    . . - - - - - - - -- - , ,

    4

    The quality of this microform is heavilydependent upon the La qualitd de cette microforme dbpknd grandernent de la quality of the original thesis submitted for microfilming. qualit6 de la these soumise au microfrlmage. Nous avons Every effort has beenmade to ensure the highest quality of tout fail pour assurer une qualitb supdrieure de reprodue;. , - reproduction possible. tion.

    If pa es are mis$ng, contact the university which granted B S'il manque des pages, veuillez cornmuniquer a F c the e,gree. ' , I'universite qui 9 confer6 le grade. / - - I

    Some ages may have indistinct print especial1 if the origina'pages f' were t ped with a poor typewriter ri bon or - if the university sent g s an inferior photocopy. . I!

    Previously copyrighted materials (journal articles, pub- , lighed tests, etc.) are not filmed.

    Reproduction in full or in part of this microform is overned by the Canadian Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1970, c 8-30. . ,

    - - - J .

    La qualild.d'irnpression de certaines pages,peut laisser A ddsirer, surtout si les pages originales ont 616 dactylogra- phiees A I'aide d'un ruban us6 ou si I]universit6 nous a fat p a ~ e n i r une photocopie de qualit6 infbrieure. - -

    Les documents qui font dejh I'objet d'un droit d'auteur (articles de *revue, tests publibs, etc.) ne sont pas microfilm6s.

    La reproduction, meme partielie, de cette microforme esl swrnise a la Loi canad~enne sur le droit d'auteur, SRC" 1970, C. C-30

  • TRACE OF O I L :

    , B.A. [Honours), Simon Fraser University, 1986

    / THESIS SUBMITTED.IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF

    MASTER OF ARTS

    i n the Department

    History , i

    1 Geoffrey D. L~C* 1987 1

    SIWN FRASER UNIVERSITY -

    August, 1987

    A l l r i g h t s reserved. ~ h i s work may not be . - - reproduced in whole or in part, by pbotocogy

    or other means, without pemnission of the author -

  • Permission has b e n granted L'autorisatlon a &t& accordht to the r~ational' tlbrKry 6 . of la ~i3liotli&que nati6na11c Canada to mfcroff 1 3 s du Canada, d e ricrofilmer . - thesis and to 1 c&-te thhae et de prater ou copies of the

    a j -r d8 vendre dee exeaplaires du

    L 4 d' a m .

    +% -1 - - -- - The ZRFHEX E . f o p ~ ~ &rrrerF t i tr tear ft t-f &re dti - -- T

    h a s r e s e r v e d o t h e r auteur) se rbeerve- le8 publication rights* and pa droits de publication; nehther t-he thesf e nor ni 'la th8se ni de l o n g e extensive extracts from it extraits de celle-ci ne may .be printed or otherwise doiqnt . &re imprids ou reproduced wf thout hie/her auth&ent, reprodui tu qans s o n written permission. autagiisation &rite. -/

    t' A 4 "

    ISBN 0-315-#608-X

  • Degree I

    -

    Tit-le of

    Master of Ar?s

    thesis- Trace of 01i. t h e Search f o r an hi tiating Factor in the Ctiscd War

    Examirnng Cornrr~r t tee.

    Prsf essor Emeritus Unwersi t y of Miami

    P - ,

  • I h e r e b y g r a n t to ,S imon F r a s e r U n i v e r s i t y t h e r i g h t t o l e n d

    my t h e s i s o r d i s s e r t a t i o n ( t h e t i t l e of which i s shown b e l o w ) t o ;sirs

    o f t h e Simon F r a s e r U n i v e r s i t y L i b r a r y , and t o make p a r t i a l o r s i n g l e - -

    copies o n l y f o r s u c h u s e r s o r i n r e s p o n s e t o a r e q u e s t f rom t h e ! i > r a r v \ -

    of a n y o t h e r university, o r o t h e r e d u c a t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n , or; i t s o::n - - -- -

    A-

    b e h a l f o r f o r one of i t s u s e r s . I f u r t h e r a g r e e t h a t p e r m i s s i o n h r - d'

    m u l t i p l e c j p y j n g o f t h i s t h e s i s f o r s c h o l a r l y p u r p o s e s may b e grn: :ed /-

    b y a e o r t h e Dean cf G r a d u a t e S t u d i e s . I t I S u n d e r s t o o d tt-,at cop:..ing - - -- - A-

    - T---

    * C o r p u b i ~ c a t i o n of t h i s t h e s i s f o r f i n a n c i a l g a i n s h a l l n o t be allowed .a

    v i t:?ou: my writ t e n g e r m i s s i o n . &

    t

    Trace of O i l : The search f o r an Initiating F a c t o r - pp = - --

    i n t h e Chaco War. . - - -

    d

    A u t h o r :

    (name )

    - f ( d a t e )

  • . - 1 ... . - . d

    . . - . .. . . - . . ~ . . . ._, . - , - - 4 - .--;-;~z+,.

  • -- -

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    APPROVAL PAGE ii .

    ABSTRACT , i i i

    Chmter j - - - -- I. INTRODUCTION 1 - ' - --

    11. BACKGROUND TO THE'CONFLICT 3 Geography The Chaco ~oryal, Paraguay, Bolivia

    -- - - Ri=t6rio-tFae to t hg ~ h a c o 6 - ---- --

    - - Early 6 1879 Protocol 10 1887 ~roto36l 12 Uti Possidetis de Jure ' 14 4 1894 Protocol -- 15 1907 Protocol 15 Bolivia Expands in the Chaco 16 1913-21 17

    -- Fort i n Sorpresa 18 1927 Protocol 19

    -- - - - - Fe&&f?- VhffgtB& 2 - - pp 3 - L9

    Military Expansion 20 War and Settlement # 21 /

    111. CHACO CAUSATION: PREVIOUSLY INADEQUATELY 'DEFINED Alternative Port ,,Ar'

    - To The west: Rail Links et a1 24 , Rail Links 24

    Political Parties / 1 26

    To The East: Santa Cruz de la Sierra ; 27 Routes * 28 -- Geography~and Agriculture 31

    History 32 Navigation 36 Cheap Riches ' 38

    War of the, Pacific 39 ' Miguel SuArez Ar-aila - - - - - 4 1 --- ,-- Bolivia and the Tacna-Arica Dispute 4 2 \ 2. . .

    i l i t . , a r v ' u R O ~ P i n theChacoPp-- 46 Paraguay 46 Bolivia 51 History to 1900 5 2-

    * --

  • Merchants 'of Death * r : -

    1929 Depression Daniel Salamanca Foreign Imperialism - Argentine Links to Paraguay

    - - War of t h e Txiple-Alliance - - _ IV. OIL

    Analysis di 1 -

    Previous Theories History 84

    b ---- - - - -- World.-'---- - - -- -- -- 84 - - - -- -,-- -

    8 5- --

    LaF=KAmerica to 1932 . Bolivia to 1937

    - 86

    1500-1880 fi - 86 1880-1912 , 1912-16

    /

    1916-20 ' 1920-37

    Critical Decade - .V . CONCLUSIONS

    A APPENDICES Tables Maps

    GLOSSARY'

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • Population of Bolivia: by ~a~artrnbnt & ~a jor' Centre 129 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --

    Paraguayan Land Sales ,1875-1900 130 *

    Bolivia's Silver Exports 1820-1909 d 131

    Bolivian/Paraguayan Government Revenue 1855-1930 1'3 2 - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -

    - --

    Huanchaca Silver Mine & Anice60 Arce 134

    & Paraguayan Presidents 188011935 135

    Ports: Imports and Exports 1918 136 - .

    1662-1932 137

    Tin Production 1897-3935 139

    Loans 1908-1934 %+ - - 140

    Bolivian

    Bolivian

    Fortines

    Bo1 iv'ian

    la.* Bolivian -

    Paraguayan Exports 1930 141 -

    ~olivian Oil Concessions 1867-1918 142 --

    Bolivian Oil Production 1925-35 145

  • 1. South America - -- - - --

    -- - 2 .' Bolivia and ~ara~u'a~"' 147 /-

    3. The Chaco Boreal: Geagraphy, Centres

    4. Paraguay: 1932 ., 149 pp - -

    *> t * -

    -- - - - - - - -- - -- -

    - - * - - - - - - - - - - -- - 5. ~oliviac 1932 2 150 - . . -

    L t - - 6. Protocols 1879'-1894 , $4 Y 151

    7. ~blivia's Pacific Coast: 1825*

    8. Protocols 1907-1932; %ennonites; Military Expansion 153 -

    9. Bolivia's Rail Network: 1868-1925 154 w *

    - - - - - l L P u e & a S u u A r p a 1 5 5 % . * , -

    11. Fortines: 1905-1932 $*%

    1 5 6

    -%". t

    12. Oil in Bolivia - _ - 157.

  • INTRODUCTION

    -- -- The Cham War, 1932-35, was fought- between Bol-iv-la I - - - - - - - - A - Y -

    c

    -

    and Paraguay (Map 11, after a long and futile perlod of

    / -- diplomatic negotiations. Elsewhere, the war is a neazly

    A-

    -- - -- forgotten> lncidtmt Lexcept-for the decade -of - f r g h t u g , _ - - - - -- -- - /-

    1927-35)--in part, because Bolivia and Paraguay are two of - -%+-

    the least known countries in the world. Chapter I1 presents

    the background to the war.

    - The reasons for the outbreak of full-seal-ar

    -:A -\* between Bolivia and Paraguay in 1932 have never.-Been

    - - - - --- - -- - - - -- --

    addressed satisfactorily in the literature. Historians have.

    postulated nine prima y theories, These are: The War of t - . the Pacific; 7 - Bolivia's Search for an Alternative Port;

    2.

    Y #

    ' Military Postures; the 'Merchants of Death1; The 1929

    Depression; President Daniel Salamanca of Bolivia; Foreign

    Imperialism; Argentine Links to Paraguay; and The

    J-7 Exploitation of Oil Fields Along the Periphery of theTKaco d-

    \ - -- - - - -- --

    After 1320; Chapter-111 aTGly+~s dnd disca~ds -2s-

    -- unsatisfactory the first'eight theories. '~he ninth is

    discussed (and discarded) separately, in Chapter IV. .

  • /

    The diecudsion of previous theories ik important to - -

    this thesis beca~se the Chaco War literature is cluttered -

    with works,which incorporate at least one of the nine / - theari9s named above. Few of the theories have substantial

    / -1 - supporti-ng evidence;. nevertheless, they a,re quoted at - great

    + Chapter IV incorporates the re$ults of my analysis,

    of the Bolivia-paraguay Chaco dispute: I conclude it by 9 - \

    postulating a circumstantial case that the Chaco War occurred

    as a resQlt df Bolivian,assertion of its national . -

    . in oil before 1920--a factor rarely given

    I have utilized utilized official --

    and Paraguay, League of Nations - --

    pfoportion--works by historkans

    from Bolivia, -Paraguay, the United States, Great Bri'tain, + -

    France, and the U.S.S.R.I

    In this paper, the term "Chaco Dispute" will be . -

    defined as the period leading up to the outbreak of - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- i -- -

    d --

    full-scale war in 1932. The term "Chaco War" will denote

    hostilities from 1932 to 1935; A

  • - - ' , ".. -

    - CHAPTER I1 - - -

    . - . - I -.

    BACKGROUND TO CONFLICT:

    I '

    GEOGVPEJY AND HISTORY - - - - - - -- -- - . - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - A-

    - - - 5 - - - LC

    Geoqraphy: The C h a c o Boreal, P a r a g u a y , B o l i v i a 5

    "

    T h e z o n e d i s m t e d b y B o l i v i a a n d P a r a g u a y c o m p r i s e s

    - i n t u r n , gave i t s name t o t h e w a r w h i c h would be f o u q h t

    b e t w e e n t h e t w o n a t i o n s .

    T h e Chaco B o r e a l ( h e r e a f t e r t h e Chac& i s t h e -- -

    n o r t h e r n s e c t o r o f t h e G r a n C h a c o , a geographical r e g i o n s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C

    w h i c h s t r e t c h e s f r o m t h e B r a z i l i a n - B o l i v i a n > - b o r d e r ?in t h e , i ?< -- >-:- n o r t h t o A r g e n t i n a i n t h e s o u t h . The c h a d b B o r e a l h a s a n * -

    La w e . The - I - -

    d i s t a n c e i s , a b o u t 900 k i l o r n e t r e s . The P a r a g u a y a n d Y

    P i ~ c b m a y o r i v e r s f o r m t h e C h a c o ' s e a s t e r n a n d s o u t h e r n

    b o u n d a r i e s , resp_ee_ctively. I t s n o r t h e r n l l m i t ' s a re d e f l n e d * -

    hy k h e l o w m o u n t a i n s f i a t run f r o m S a n t ~ C r u z t-o0P_uerLo ' , .

    S u a r e z ; i t s w e s t e r n --- l i m i t s by t h e f o o t h i l l s t h a t b o r d e r t h e - -

    B o l i v i a n A l t i p l a n o i n a l i n e r u n n i n g f r o m V i l l a M o n t e s t o

  • - - ," L ,

    L-

    The Chaco 1s nearly .flat. It gradua-lly rises in

    a1tlt;de as one moves to the north and west (froan 100 metres '4

    above -sea level at the ~ara~ua~-~ilcoi&~o con•’ lug~ce to 450 - L.

    metres- 1.n the extreme north-west corner).The domlnant " * i

    ~egetat~ibn 1s subtropical Eoqest, qlthough large stretches. -

    - -

    --dry GrarnalShd. aioand. ~ A a c o t,emperatures a~& hot in the - * &

    summer (January daily temperatures are >29OCelsius) and - &hparatlvely cool (July ave ages 18-20•‹C) in the inter.^ - *

    . b: Precip~tat 1m-i r.-s k1gM7 s e z ~ m a 4 : sfimmer rairtsL-tktober to -- - --

    ' March--flood a large part of the land; winter drought--April * f - .

    to September--causes the majority of the rivers to dryap.* I

    $

    4

    I n ;he winter only a limited Lumber of wells contain drinking . ,

    water. Poisonous snakes, scorpions, and malarial mosquitoes -

    - . present further problems. Not surprisingly; the thaco has= d

    the epithet 'Green Hell'.s /-

    Neverthel,ess, the Chaco possessed a number of positive

    features which attracted pioneering groups to the region.

  • . I

    --

    tannic acid (tannin) for use in the leather tannlng i h d u s t r y , - - - - - - - - - - -- +

    - or cut into rail ties. Neither precious metals nor othek - - 7

    vdl&ble resources ar-e found within its confines. - - 4 #

    . i At the time of the Chaco War most non-natives

    confined their activities to an .approximately one hundr.t*d * .

    I Kilometre wide strip of land adjacent to the Paraguay: - - - - - - River, from Puerto Su,Arez--in Bolivia--in the nirrth, to Asuncib-in Paraguay--in the south; this zone had easy

    access to outside markets. In 1927, the Chaco's populatlon 2 - -- ---

    - 4 was estimated at 37,5007 of whom 30,000 were Indlans. ,- - 7

    Paragugiy bordered the ~haco, its act-ess only hampered EL

    I by the Paraguay River. Most of Paraguay's major c l t ~ e s , I including Asuncibn--capital, main port, a n H r q e s t city--

    were located only a few kilometres from he borders of the 3 . / /

    The northern and western boundaries of the Chaco lle

    .. .within the present'borders of Bolivia. However;Bcrl~v~a's

    largest population centres.(Table I ) , with .the exception of

    Santa Cruz, lie on the Altiplano* (the 3000-metre-hlgh plain

    situated between the main cordilleras of the Andes , * . ., - - L

    Mountains), and a;e t&@&fore .. . a long distance from the - se=- - -- - - - - - - -- t

    - disputed zone. La Paz, one of two capitals ef ~olivl>, ilee

    ry -- 4 -- - --

    800 kilometres distant from t3e nearest pojnt of the Chaco;

    Cochabamba is over 500 kilometres distaht; Sucre, the other ----

  • A -- L - - -- - A - - . - - -- 2 - L -- ----- capital, is 400 kilometres away (Map 5). ' '

    - P Historic C l a i m s to the Chaco

    I

    The origins of the Bolivia-Paraguay Chaco dispute can

    be tracdback, to 'tre ill-def lned adknistrative divisions ?'

    -2

    of thdSpanish Empire. . i --IL -'d ' t - - - I - - - I , General Simon Bollvsr decreed "ti

    ,' *. Pousgdet de Jure major administrative \ ii '7 >

    1

    div'&ions thdp p.rovide the blueprint of - - - - - --- -

    the newly - independent States after the Reydutionary wars."e -

    The Ib-rger Spapish political entities, which included-- - Audlenclas, Captaicncies General, and Vlceroyal ties, were to

    form thebasis for the new South American natlonal \ -- -

    bounda.rles. Unfortunately, Bolivar had no opportunity to - - - e ~ - f - f ~ - w h e ~ e ~ t t e s e ~ t t ~ ~ ies 4-a~; --at&&-*----- --- .

    entitles of the the Spanish Empire lay frontiers;

    In--1558, the Audiencia de Charcas was created as a

    polrtical and judicial unit of Spanish contra over the -- important mlnlng district of the Altiplano what is now

    Bolivia. This area was nominally und,er the control of the -.-&

    Viceroyalty of Peru, but, in practice, Charcas was considered

    _--_tbe-area withinnnp -red. 1~-a of the city nf Ph-

    (now Sucre; Bolivia). Unfortunately, in the next two and one

  • half centuries the A u d i e n c ~ ' ~ official - borders were revised - - - - - - - - - --L - -- -- --

    many times. At one time they included the city of Buenos \

    In August 1776 Spain, in recognition of the growing

    econohic strength of that areaxx created the Viceroyalty of

    the Rio de la Plata. In 1783, Paraguay was transfeired to - - - - -- - - - - - - -

    this new entity.12 1; 1785 and 1787, the Audienclas of Buenns -

    Aires and Cuzco,~respectively, were fashioned from older L

    Spanish division^.^^ These changes directly affect-ed the -- - - - - - - - -- -

    - --

    area comprised by the ~udiencia of Charcae. whCn the --

    Spanish Empire broke up after 1810 there could be no m

    consensus as to where national boundaries should run.

    Spaniards from Asuncibn had originally settled the - western banks of the upper Paraguay Rlver and lnland alonq

    -

    t he-niiF€hir i ngesor T3iF ~hiioCOnce~pc10nwasse t % h e c F ~ n

    1773,14 Fuerte Borbon (now Fuerte Olimpo) in 1792, and Santa

    Cruz in 1561.x5 After 1810, Paraguayans continued thelr

    consistant, albeit small-scale, explozltatlon of the fringes

    of the Chaco bordering the Paraguay River. Bolivla made an

    early, futile, attempt to settle pioneers alonq the fringes

    of the Chaco ib the Department - of Santa Cruz, but this area

    proved unpopular for ~rnmigration because of ~ t s isvlation - - - - - - - - - ----

    and lack of effective transportation. - - - -- - - -

    On 15 July '1852 Argentina and paragudy signed the

  • Varela-Derqui Treaty. Article 4 stated that "the Paraguay *

    River 'shall belong from bank to bank in full sovere'ignty .D

    to the Republ ic of Paraguay d o w ~ to the -confluence of the -

    Paran& ' " . Article 5 guaranteed Paraguay f a-nd- ~rgentina) i

    free access to the Bermejo River (Map 2 ) . Article 12 allowed

    Paraguay to build a port on the upper reaches_of_the- - - - -- --

    Pilcomayo River. This treaty precipitated the first -- - a -

    diplomatic clash between Paraguay and Bolivia over the Chaco.

    Bolivia_protested the three - -- clauses - cited :above, but to no -

    avail .I6 Both Paraguay 'and Argentina were stronger militarily -- - , than Bol ivia .

    '\ -

    In 1854+Paraguayan President car1os'~ntonio Lbpez

    established a "special zonen at Nuevo Burdeos, a site ten

    kilometres north of Asuncibn on the west bank of the - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - J- -- -- -- - - --

    Paraguay River. French immigration to Nuevo Burdeos (now

    Villa ~ayes)-failed in 1855, but it was the first conscious -

    effo2t by Paraguay to incorporate the Chaco'into the

    government's sphere of infl~ence.'~

    In 1864, The War of the Triple Alliance, which pitted /

    Paraguay agalnst Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, began. By

    its conclusion in 1870 - -- Paraguay - - had - suffered total defeat; - - -- - - - -

    ~ts-economy was ruined and most of its male population were - - - - -- -

    -

    dead. Just before the outbreak of war, Balivia had triea to

    interest Paraguay ih diplomatic discussicma concerning the . - - --

  • Ch~co. ,After the fighting - -- -- began, - however, Bo1iv1.a attempted -

    to profit from Paraguay's misfortunes.. Under the terms of t

    the 1865 Treaty of Offensive and Defensive Alliance, signed .-

    between Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, Argentina claimed %

    all the Chaco. Argentine diplomats privately agreed, however,

    thataonce Paraguay had been defeated, Bolivia would receive - - - - -

    the Chaco from the Berme jo River north as far as Bahia Negra - - - - - - - - -

    (Map 3 ) . This point was clarified in an Argentine-Bollvian

    \ treaty signed in 1868. Unfortunately, squabbles between \ - -- - - Brazil and Argentina after 1870 over divxslon of the Chaeo - --- -.

    resulted in Bolivi being excluded from a final settlement.1e - - Pr , a

    Paraguay was n t divided amongst-the allies. In 1876 a I

    Paraguay signed a pehce treaty withaArgen'tina, cedlng to

    the la/tter the region between tH$'~ilcoma~o and Berrnejo

    claims to the region from the Verde River north tbaBahia

    Negra.19 Under-one of the treaty's clauses, United States

    President Rutherford 8 . Rayes arbitrated a disputed zpne a

    -- -between the Pilcomayo and Verde rivers (Map 3 ) . On 12 s==-

    November 1878, Hayes ruled in favour of Paraguay dand

    became a Paraguayan hero) despite objections from Bolivla - - -

    concerning the legality of arbitration over landls wh'ose *

    ownership-had never been determined.=O -- -

    - -

    In November 1875 Paraguay began to sell off government

  • -

    -- - -- - - -- --- - - - - - - l a n d , i n c - l u d l n g areas i n t h e Chaco, as a means o f g e n e r a t i n g

    r e v e n u e p r i o r t o t h e r e - e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f l a sound economy. -

    h

    T h e s e l a n d sales were h a l t e d i n 1876 , p e n g i n g t h e n e g o t i a t i o n - -

    of a t r e a t y w i t h A r g e n t i n a , b u t w e r e resumed a g a i n i n 1 8 8 3 - -

    , ( T a b l e 2 ) ; l a n d s a l e s d i d n o t end u n t i l 1900 . By t h i s t i m e

    - I mast o f ' . the e a s k e r n Chaco, a n d a l a r g e - p e r c e n t a g e . o f - - - - - - -- - - -- + - - - P a r a g u a y ' s totyl l a n d s u r f a c e w e r e i n t h e h a n d s o f p r i v a t e - - m o s t l y A r g e n t i n e - - i n v e s t o r s . The l a r g *entine i n v e s t o r

    was C a r l o s Casado , who bough t - -- - - - -

    -

    h e c t a r e s i n t h e C h a c ~ . ~ ~ -C

    l a n d s a l e s a number o f - . I 1

    P u e r t o Coope r , P u e r t o P i n a s c o , P u e r t o S a s t r e - - h a d b e e n

    e s t a b l i s h e d o n t h e w e s t bank o f t h e P a r a g u a y R i v e r (Map 4 ) . - ,

    / - - - The 1879 Q u i j a r r o - D e c o u d P r o t o c o l

    A r g e n t i n a a t t e m p t e d t o s e i z e t h e Chaco a s f d r n o r t h a s t h e 1)

    O t u q u i s R i v e r f rom P a r a g u a y , a s payment f o r w a r d e b t s . T h i s

    A r g e n t 5 n e i n i t i a t i v e , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e 1876 A r g e n t i n a - - - P a r a g u a y t r e a t y , moved B o l i v i a , i n 1 8 7 8 , t o open f o r m a l .

    diplomatic n e g o t i a t i o n s w i t h P a r a g u a y r e g a r d i n g t h e d i v i s i o n -

    of t h e C h a c ~ . ~ ~ O n 1 5 O c t o b e r 1879 e n v o y s f rom B o l i v i a and

    - - - a b l i s h e d t h e boundary b e t m e t w o n a t i o n s a l o n g t h e

    20305' p a r a l l e l , a bounda ry wh ich a p p a r e n t l y began w h e r e t h e

  • .r

    -- - - Apa River met the Parasuay ~ i v e r (Map 6 ) . Paraguay possessed 4

    strong de facto claims to the -upper Paraguay '~lver but lack -

    of interest, which stemmed from its economic woes after the , - .-

    - War of the Triple Alliance, caused the nation to give them up. However. fn 1881, just prior to final approval of the

    4

    draft treaty by the ~ational Congresses of both countries,

    -- - -

    Bolivia demandgd changes in the protoco1. ThC major revTsion -

    demanded would have allowed Bolivia to build-a port on the -

    Pilcomayo River below the Fsteros de Patiiio,, south of the

    - - -- ----

    protocal limits. Paragnay was unwilling to make sac* '. - -- d I

    attitude the ' concessions; indeed, because of Bolivia's

    Paragua ns even refused to ratify the or P \

    Paraguayan belief in the revenue potentia -- l.of the C h a c o also may have played a significant role in their refusal to s l g n .

    - The rev is t c r m ~ m a n d e d - ~ ~ d - i + r - i ~ - ~ ~ t f ~ - - ~ ~ & e ~ - - - - -

    implemented. In any c v e , in 1879 the country becaw #

    embroiled in a war against Chile. The War of the Pacific, - -

    which would last until 1883. occurred because large deposits-

    of natural - - nitrates--important ingredients In fertilizers ,and gunpowders--in the form of guano and caliche, had been

    discovered in Bolivia's Department of Atacama In the area

    around Mejillones (guano) in the 1840'9, and Salar de - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- -- --

    Carmen (caliche) in the 1860's (Map 7). These discoveries - - - - - -- --

    attracted large numbers of Chilean merchants, who gradually

    assumed political as well as economic control over the area. -

  • operations in the area, the Chilean merchants appealed to - -

    their government. In 1879 Chile declared war on Boliviaaand , \

    Peru (which was also affected by Chilean exploitat40n).~~ I

    , -_ Bolivia was decisively defeated in The War of the - .

    Pacific, The nation's loss-of itOepartmentof~Atacama. - - --

    whrch in'cluded all its Pacific coastline, was confirmed in

    the indefinite truce signed with Chile in ~pril. 1884. Mbre -

    portantly. the loss of Atacama threatened the mchvemento? - -

    , - / - - -

    - - -- --- ---- - - - - - - - - -

    goods between the mines on the Altiplano and the Pacific

    ports in the Department. To reach the Pacific. ore shipped

    from the Altiplano mines-%tal to Bol ivia-'s economy

    (Table 3; Table 4)--had to cross whqt was now chilean / /

    , -%-.

    territory. The l o s s e ~ in the War of the ~acifiP'; therefore. - @ 2 . /'

    w e r e m r e f mpoTtant to HoIIv%als weltare-than its ambiti'ons

    in the Chaco. r

    The 1887 Tamayo-Aceval Protocol

    The War of the Pacific focussed Bolivian interest

    on the country's western border. ~everthe'less, once the'

    shock of.the loss of the Pacific coastline had dimhished, - \ hlivia re-opened-discussions with Paraguay on an equitable

    i ' - - division o-f the Chaco: - - -- - -"I C - -, - - -

    On 16 ~ebruary-1887 the Tamayo-Aceval Protocol was

  • \

    signed.26 Similar to tKe 1879 protocol, this agreemen't. 1

    divided the Chaco into three sections, one each to be given - to Bolivia and Paragu,ay, the third to be arbitrated by the

    I - - , King of Belgium (Map 6 ) .

    Unfortunately, in gate 1887 Paraguayan troopsc

    stormed Puerto ~acheco--which had just been ektablished by +-. -- --

    - J - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- ' a Bolivian entrepreneur a few kilometrgs south of Bahia

    P ; - ------ - Negra--hauled down the Bolivian flag whlch had been raised

    i over the town, and declaaed the regi& to be P a r a g ~ a y a n . ~ ~ --- - - -- ", - +-- - --A

    Nonetheless, despite Pa flagrant 'attack, ~&Fivia

    raf if ied the protocol in '~overnber 1888, but Paraguay ' s

    Congress, in opposition to the ruling Colorado Party,

    violently opposed and therefore rejected the . z s

    Over the next seven years, Bolivia continued to push - - - - - - - - - - - -

    for a settrement ofTLFChaco dispute, occa=onarlTittl-

    the aid of neighbouring South pmerican nations.2g Paraguay, $ .

    - --

    for the most part, ignored Bolivia's exreaties.

  • U t i Possidetia de Jure . . - .

    9

    ' e he failure of the 1887 Protocol, and the

    resulting animosity between Bolivia and Paraguay, created _ an unusual situation in which both sides in the dcspute ,

    -- began to subsidize research into their, -- legal claims in the . Chaco. In 1892 Paraguay published the first work on iCs

    -- - l e g a l claims, a n d s o o n erlocto2aes -en-Chaco' w e r e combkg --- - - - * $ '

    ?

    '~panish archives for evidence to prcive their government's --

    rights over the Chaco. The volume of such writings peaked

    fivezyears prior to theoutbreak of war in 1932.

    Initially, Bolivia' claims to the Chaco &as based upon i

    t h e formula, -- Uti ~ossidktis de jure; i.e. it derived from the *_

    boun6ries of the Audiencia de Charcas. However, the

    that neither side could prove its case to the satisfacion of ,- r -.

    the dther. Paraguay's claim, instead, lay in possession; -7-

    PI

    Uti Possidetis de facto, rgther than on legal grounds

    l (although its historians contihued to comb =chives

    containing documents on the political divisions of the

    Spanish Empire).31 Cecilio BBez, a leading Paraguayan

    dlplomat and historian and a participant - w n y of the - - --- - - - - -- --k. , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- --- -

    - Chaco discussions with Bolivia, stated Paraguay's , -* case simply

    in 1904: the country in possession (of the Chaco) -,.

    owns it.32 i

  • The 1894 Benitez-Ichazo Protocol S '

    In 1 94, under Uruguay's guidance, Bolivia again . \ pressed for abettlement of the Chaco dispute; the result

    - - i was the ~eni6ez-1chazo ~rotocol. This divided the Chaeo -

    Q - -

    into two sections, the boundrary running from just abov-e

    - --

    - -. Fuerte-OIimpo diagonarly to €lie Pilcomayo River (Map-6) .73 -

    - . Neither side approved the protocol: Paraguay because of

    opposition in Congress and the press; Bolivia because ~ t s d

    - -- -

    - PkesGfdent, Mar-iarro-Baptistar, refused to send the flnal dm* - - --=

    d

    to his Congre~s."~ '

    In the following decade Chaco negotiations would be

    hampered by political upheaval in Bolivia and Paraquay. Tn - - 1898, Bolivia experienced a bloody golpe when the Liberal

    /

    1911, ~aragu5yan citizens endured the series of vlclous civil -

    wars, which followed ffom the Liberal Party' "seizure of

    control control of the government from the Colorado

    (Conservative)* regime in 1904. 0

    The 1907 Pinilla-Soler Protocol

    Despite the political troubles in-both countr.ies, \

    -- - b l ivia continued neg&i&ions-witLParaguay o w t h e 6

    0. on 12 J a m y 1907 the pinilla-Sole Protocol w a s Y

    signed. This divided the Chaco in&o two sectlonsi one to - -

    f 2zzd ' d -

    i L k-

  • b e l o n g t o P a r a g u a y , the o t h e r t o be a r b i t r a t e d (Map 6 ) .

    P-uay-immediately a p p r o v e d t h e p r o t o c o l , k m t ' B o l i v i a l s

    Natiorlal C o n g r e s s h e s i t a t e d , a n d b e f o r e it c o u l d - r e n d e r a

    d e c i s i o n , A r g e n t i n a , whieh w a s t o b e t h e a r b i t r a t o r , : < . - - .

    s u p p o r t e d P e r u ' s p o s i t i o n i n a bounda ry d i s p u t e a g a i n s t ' .- -

    B o l i v i a . T h e r e f o r e , B o l i v i a q u i c k l y r e j e c t e d t h e p r o p o s e d F

    , ag reemen t . - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- .- - - -- - - -

    7

    B o l i v i a Expands i n t h e Chaco

    B o l i v i a compounded t e n s i o n s w i t h P a r a g u a y o v e r t h e .. -- C k m f mpf erm-rrti~~q-cr &rniiTw* f ve aeo%s b e t w e e n -- - - - - -

    1905-1911. On 27 December 1 9 0 5 , o s t e n s i b l y . b e c a u s ' e of t h e

    +eat d i s t a n c e s betwken t h e c i t y o f T a r i j a a n d t h e , e a s t e r n

    r e a c h e s of t h e F o n f l u e n c e o f ' t h e Pa raguay a n d P i l comayo

    r l v e r s , t h e Chaco became a s e l f - g o v e r n i n g T e r r i t o r i o , w i t h

    its o h delegacidn n a c i o n a ? , s e p a r a t e f rom t h e ~ e p r t m e n t o f

    T a r i j a . The T e r r i t o r y o f t h e Chaco i n c l u d e d t h e r e g i o n f rom

    V i l l a Montes ' sou th -&s t t o Esteros d e ~ a t i f i o a s w e l l a s t h e -

    i n t e r i o r zone o f t h e Chaco. V i l l a Montes became - t h e nomina l

    c a p i t a l . 36

    ,r-s

    On 11 J a n u a r y 1 9 1 1 , B o l i v i a c r e a t e d t h e T e r r i t o r i o del

    Orlente as a n area s e p a r a t e f r o m t h e Depa r tmen t of S a n t a -

    C r u z . T h e O r i e n t e e n d o s e d t h e area w e s t o f a n d p a r a l l e l t o - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- ---

    t h e P a r a g u a y R i v e r f rom ~ i n M a t i a a , n q a r t h e B r a z i l i a n b o r d e r

    i n t h e n o r t h , t o t h e P i l comayo River i n t h e s o u t h ; - a n d f r o m

  • the' Paraguay River westwgkd to approxlrnatel y t-he 61 '

    meridian;. there it bordered the Territory of the Chaco. C =

    Puerto Sudrez was the territorial capital. 3 7 Soon after

    the establishment of both these territories, Paraguayan

    civilians in the Chaco began to run afoul of Bollvian C -

    ' military units.

    > T

    Despite the failures of of prior protocols,

    both countries continued to discuss solutrons to the C h a c i ) - --- - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - --

    problem. On .5 April 1913 their respective diploma't.s signed

    the Ayala-Mujia Protocol which voided the t e r m s of t h e 1 9 0 7 --

    agreement, agreed to maintain the status quo f c J r the next f-' ' two years, and disposed that - if , no final agreement had

    d

    occurred by the end of that time, the C h a c o d i s p u t r would be

    p u t b-arbitr&ion,Xr~~t~~c&sto postpone a f j n a 1 a r h i-t rat ion

    were signed by both nations in 1915, 1916, 1917, and 1918. i

    - - f . Further talks in 1919 and 1921 produced no agreement.'"

    \

    Save for

    after 1913, in

    was Paraguay's

    one occasion, Bolivia was thq aggressor,

    the penetration of the Chaco. The exce2tlon

    settlement - of two large groups of Mennonites /

    (totalling 3200 men, women, and childi-fen) in %he central

    area. The Mennonites-had-chosen Paraguay - on - - the adv~ce of .4

    their advance gcouts, and apparently against the winhes of --

    the Paraguayan government. The immigrants began neqotlatlons

    -- F -- -

  • i

    - - t - ~ : ~ ~ y - f i - Q - ~ Q f U ~ h P r t n r e s l a n d f rom t h e casad&company % t * - - -

    ( o r i g i n a l l y formed by C a r l o s C a s a d o ) i n 1921 , a - r r i v e d i n r"

    Paraguay i n l a te , 1 9 2 6 , a n d s e t t l e d on t h e i r new 4 l a n d s i n

    1 9 2 7 - 8 (Map 8) .39 h he Mennon i t e s i m m e d i a t e l y bec'ame a s o u r c e 0

    of i r l . i k a f i 6 n be tween B o l i v i a a n d P a r a g u a y , p a r t i o u l a ? l y a s

    t h e i m m i g r a n t s had s e t t l e d v e r y c l o s e t o areas where * "

    - - - - - - R o l l v i a n m i l i t a r y i n c u r s i o n s h - a d o c c u r r e d , r ecen t ly : -

    t, From 1900 t o 1 9 3 2 , P a r a g u a y , . w i t h t h e a i d of - t h e v % 0

    Mennonite s e t t l e m e n t s a n d c o n s i d e r a b l e A r g e n t i n e economic * - - - L -- - - - A- A - - -

    - - -

    i n v e s t m e n t . ( i n l a n d , cat;tle, and ' c p e b r a c h o i n d u s t r i e s ) , --a

    c o n s d l i d a t e d i t s eConomic c o n t r o l o f t h e t h e n a r r o w ' s t r i p a* "* A

    of lbnd b o r d e r i p g t h e i e s t bank o f t h e P a r a g u a y R i v e r . By

    1 9 3 2 , i n v e s t m e n t s i n l a n d , q u e b r a c h o , and c a t t l e i n t h e + ,>-

    Chaco t o t a l l e d p e r h a p s ~ Y t 5 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( g o l d p e s o s ) ; t h e s e &

    c @ - 7idmtrrerprsttfbed-&kd-&Par-ag1,a~-k&nalr~u~- - - . Narrow gauge p r i v a t e l y owned r a i l n e t w o r k s , p e r h a p s 2 5 0 ,

    k l l o r n e t r e s i n l e n g t h ( o n e - t h i r d o f I?aragua;'s t o t a l ) , moved --

    t h e goods t o t h e P a r a g u a y R i v e r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e t w o r k . 4 0

    - . . F o r t i n Sorpresa "s1n t h e 1 9 2 0 ' s ~ o l i v l a a n d P a r a g u a y kearmed t h e i r

    m i l i t a r y f o r c e s w i t h new weapons b o u g h t i n E u r o p e ' a n d Nor th '

    ~ m e d c a . A : ' t h e sdme t i m e , mil*hl:y commartds - k - b o k h

    n a t i o n ' s e f f o r t s t o c o n t r o l t h e Chaco I n e v i t a b l y ,. m i l i tar$,

  • c l a s h e s o c c u r r e d . Most o f t h e s e s k i r m i s h e s were - - - ---A - - -&- - - ---- -

    i n s i g n i f ; c a n t , b u t t w o , a t F o r t i n e s S o r p r e s a a n d V a n g u a r d l a ,

    c a u s e d ' 8 e r i o u s d y p l o m a t i c a n d p o l i t . i c a 1 r e p e r c u s s i o n s ---- - -

    w i t h i n B o l i v i a a n d P a r a g u a y , a n d d l m o s t l e d t o w a r .

    O n 25 F e b r u a r y 1 9 2 7 , a small P a r a g u a y a n m l l ~ t a r y u ~ ~ t

    w a s c a p t u r e d n e a r F o r t i n S o r p r e s a (Map 8 , Hap 111.. I n t h e

    - - - - - - - -

    e n s u i n g s f r u g g l e , , t h e - ~ a r a g u a y a n o f f i c e r I n c h a r g e was *

    k i l l e d w h i l e t r y i n g t o escape. The P a r a g u a y a n g o v ~ r n m e n ~ 1

    i m m e d i a t e l y p r o t e s t e d t h e B o l i v i a n a r m y ' s a c t i o n s , a n d , f o r L'

    - - - - - t h e first time, large scare p u 5 l i c demands f o r miIlrary -

    m o b i l i z a t i o n arose I n b o t h c o u n t r i e s , 4 1

    . The 1927 Gutierrez-Diaz Le6n Protocol . - . A f t e r - t h e S o r p r e s a i n c i d e n t , ' ~ r ~ e n t i n a w a s ail1 r t o

    a t t r a c t B o l i v i a a n d P a r a g u a y b a c k t o . t h e G barc ja ln lnc j t a b l e 1;

    t h o u g h i t w a s g o i n g t o d e v e l o p i n t o f u l l - s c a l e war.42 O n I

    -. 2 2 A p r i l 1 9 2 7 , I n Buenos A i r e s , t h e t w o c o u n t & s s l g n r - d t h e

    ~ u t i ~ r r e z - ~ i a ~ Le6n P r o t o c o l . U n $ o r t u n a t e l y , t h e d lp lo rna t rc

    d i s c u s s i o n s w h i c h f o l l o w e d f a i l e d m i s e r a b l y , -and Bolivld a n d

    P a r s q u a y were l e f t t o c o n t l n u e t h e l r respective p o l ~ c : i e s I n -. - -.

    2 C

    a n d P a r a g u a y r e s u m e d t h e i r - e x p l o r a t i o n s , m l l i t a r y

  • - -- - d eeea&&af e k ~ h e s + , 5 . - Dc&r 1928, a

    large Paraguayan army unit destroyed ort tin Vanguardia, a d -

    site located justLto the north of Bahia Negra. Bolivia

    retaliated by overrunning the ~araguayan fortines of.Boquer6n

    and Mariscal ,Lbpea f-w- Bolivia and Paraguay, immediately severed diplomatic relations, and war was averted

    - -- A - ---A-

    - - o n l y because the attempt at full-scale mobilization proved a

    dismal failure iri both c a u n t r i e ~ . ~ ~ Neutral nations, led by

    the United States, arranged a ceasefire and-issued an -- -

    'f p- -

    invitation to Washington, D.C. to resume discussions for a

    settlement of the Chaco dispute.

    I Military Expansion

    By this time it bad grown extremely dfiicu1.t f ~ r

    Bollvia add Paraguay *to solve their differences peackfully.

    dlplomatie discussions in Washington in 1929, and by the

    , a / rapid expansion of Edlivian and Paraguayan military forces,

    installabions, and communications networks in the Chaco,

    which . f ~ l l o n e d . ~ ~ - -- -

    1'930, ~olivia was forced to suspend secret

    mohillzatlon plans when Paraguayan cryptographers broke lts

    ---

    codes and pub1 i~hed-=~esults Lri-local andp international---- ,

    -

    . . med~a.'~ Despitethis setback, tlolivia pressed on fomdrdl, Q gradually moving its line of fortines eastward, and, more

    - - - P

  • - - -

    significantly, into the central Chaco ( s e e Chapter ' I 11-

    Military: Bolivia).

    - -- War and Settlement

    On 15 June' 1932, a Bolivian mi 1 i tary unl t captured

    ??ortln Carlos Antonio Lbpez from its Paraguayan garrison.J7

    - -

    This incident touched offpa strP?ng of events whlch 1 4 - - - - - - - -

    -. 2 -9irectly to war (although Paraguay dld not off lelal ly 'drr lare -

    war until 10 May 1933 and Bolivia officially acknowledged

    - -- it). Within a few weeks Beficv~a forces quxekly cmerran a --

    section of the Paraguayan front lines. Howcver, Paraquay's /

    . armed forces, once fully mobillzed, explolfed t h 5 l r shortcr - C

    - supply lines to push the beeter equipped, but less

    effectively led, Bollvian forces back to the f o o t h ~ l l s of

    the Andes Mountains. Bolivia was flnally able to s t c a h l l 1 7 e - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - p--

    1 t s military front In June 1935 just to the east of Villa

    Yontes and just short of Bolivia's main 0 1 1 fl~lds.'""

    A t this point, on 12 June 1935, concerned neutral

    nations were able to impose a ceaseflrr on thr e x h a u s t r d .

    combatants. On 21 July 1938-, after three years of difficult '

    negotiations -- and a near resumption of hostllltles, ~ o l ~ v l d

    and Paraguay signed a definltlve peace-treaty.4? Paraquay - was awarded appraxrrwteiy e i g M y percent -- of the-~fiaccl - - - 1- -

    Boreal (Map 8 ) .

  • SFsr - - - - - - - - - * - - - . - .A@ --

    1 - 2 2 2 .

    - - - --- - -- - - - pP

    -- - - -- - PP-

    The Chaco War cost the lives of nearly 100,QOO - - - - P- - *

    'soldiers (36,000 Paraguayan and 57,000 Bolivian). The

    continual moljilization and expenditures on weapons created - 7- - - - 4

    serlous inflation and social dislocations in both ccuntries,

    and de-stabilized their political

  • CHAPTER IT1

    . - CHACO CAUSATION:

    I PREVIOUSLY INADEQUATELY DEFINED

    T h e e i g h t t h e o r i e s of C h a c o c a u s a t i o n a n a l y z e d --

    beicw a r e ( w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n of O ? l , d rsc :usse[ l i n C h a l k e r t I -- -

    I V ) t h e i m p o r t a n t n n e s f o u n d i n t h e h i s t o r j ( -31 $$+orst lit-r*.

    T h e y a r e prrscnted i n a n a p p r o x i m a t e c h r o n r : l o i j l i . n l s c a c j l r c . n r h r .

    A l t e r n a t i v e Port

    B o l i v i a r e c o g n i z e d from i n d e p e n d e n c e on 'ward a n e e d f o r ,-I I / -

    m a j o r p o r t o n t h e P i l c o m a y o o r Pa raguay r i v ~ r s f o r the. -

    movemen t o f ' g o o d s t o t h e p t l a n t i c O c e a n . By c r ~ n p l ~ n e n t - l n q I

    p c r t s o n t h e P a c i f i c , t h i s ~ h a c o ' p o r t wot ; l l d r e d u r ( ~ e r - o n r ~ n ~ l r .

    pressures b e i n g b r o u g h t t o h e a r b y Bzlivia's nelghhours,

    A s R a i n s t a t e s , "The r e c e n t t o n f l ic t i n t h c b Chd (*n . . . -- /-

    -

    w a s d i r e c t l y , caused by B o l i v i b ' s search f o r a ~ m r k ctn dc,r- f t

    h a b i a a c a r i c i a d c e l p r d y e c t o d e u n i r ~1 O r i e n t e b c ~ l vian no

    con el A t l A n t i ~ a . " ~ ~

  • Nrverthelcss, these statements are contradicted by the fac!ts. After independence, Bolivia's orientation lay

    -

    with its western frontiers. The country could not overcome

    transportation difficulties on land and the Roor navigability

    o f r i v r r s in the Chacc. Bollvia's government neither - - -

    systematically searched,for nor developed a port on the

    ? d r d C J U 3 ~ c r Pilcomayo rivers. Untll as late as 1952

    ruccesslvc governments initiated little development in the -

    - - - - - --

    Dt.lmrt-mcnt of. S a n t a C r u z and Chaco. Three examples ,G&scussed -

    below, illustrate my point.

    To The West: Rail Links et a1

    ~oliv+storica1 western orientation is evident in

    - - -- - - t h fl- r ,l 1 1 - ~ s ten- v h i c k 2 m k e d - t h e A p t i n a a r r & ~ e ~ a c i f - i ~ - - --

    Cnast, and in the ec~onomic orientation of the political i-

    - p a r t ~ c * s in powcLr from 1880 t o P 1 9 3 2 . -

    - - , R a i l L i n k s

    '4 Prinr to 1900, Bolivia's economic strength lay

    - - in its silver mines (Table 3 ) ; export duties on silver

    proxrlded the najority of government revenues. Other

    Alnost all this mining activity was centred on the A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -o.

    d t s i t e s S U C ~ a s Potosi and Bruru.

  • t r a n s p o r t a t i c n c o s t s f o r t h e n o v ~ m e n t of t h e o r e presented - -

    c n e o f t h e n a t i o n ' s m o s t severe p r o b l e m s . The m ~ v c m c n t p f i

    o r e c o u l d o n l y be t o t h e w e s t , t o po r t s o n t h e Pac i f lc r o a s t

    - --as t h i s represented t h e eas ies t a n d cheapest r o u t e . z%s a n

    e x a m p l e , e v e n i n t h e m o s t d i f f i c u l t o f times ( t h r y ~ , l r - s a f l r - r - - - - - - - - - -- -

    t h e War of t h d ~ a c i f i c B o l i v i a c o n t i n u e d t-o move i t s - m i n ~ r . r l 1 ' - <

    e x p o r t s t h r o u g h p o r t s i n t h e west. O n l y d u r i n g t h e L w r i n d

    1879-1884 , when C h i l e blcrked R o l l v i a n e x p o r t s t hrc~ilgl-i i t s - . - - -- - -

    - --

    old p c r t s , w a s a s m a l l t o n n a g e of o r e ( p r i m a r i l y s i l v r r )

    s e n t s o u t - h by m u l e , o n t h e l o n g a n d a r d u o u s j o u r n r - 1 t ~ ) t h t - I

    A r g e n t i n e p o r t of Rosa r io de S a n t a FeS3 (ii l o n g a n d a r f I u o ~ ~ %

    j o u r n e y ) .

    9

    I n 1 8 8 3 , u n d e r C o n s e r v a t i v ~ P a r t y a u s p i r r h s ,

    + t h e p c r t s of A n t o f a y a s t a a n d Y e j i l l o n c s w l t h t h e . ;oi lb .ht*t-r t

    A l t i p l a n c s i l v e r m i n i n g d i s t r i c t (Map 91 , W h ~ n t h~ r ~ r * t w r ~ r k

    was* c o m p l e t e d t o - O r u r u i n 1 8 9 2 t r a n s p o r t a t - i y n c o s t s F C J I -

    s i ' l v e r ere were r e d u c e d s u b s t a n t i a l l y . A n o t h r r l i r l r * , . j r . 3 1 l -

    water n e t w o r k c o n p l e t e d i n 1 9 0 5 , m r ~ v ~ d g o o d s f r u m L a P ~ L t o

    Y c l l ~ c o n P e r u ' s P a c i f l c In i - i dd i t i c ln , ~n 1 9 0 4 r h ~ l r b

    b e g a n c o n s t r u c t i o n of a r a i l l u n e f rrlh :"r~-lr.d t-z, k i P a z - - t t h i s - l i n e w a s -- p a r t - o f a f i n a l a d j u s t m e n t t o the. t r ~ t ( , c ~ _ -

    - - - - -- pp -

    c o f i c l u d e d i n A p r i l 1884 b e t w e e n Chilc a n d E o l i ~ i a ) . ~ ~ Y

    E s s e n t i a l l y c o n p l e t e . i n 1 9 0 8 , t h i s 1 I nr* o p r n f ? d u p a rni~r-h,

  • >r7*..-*., . . - . - - . . . . . .- . . - . , . .- , .- , ~ ..'I , . , .~ - - . - - . *. ,;,, -.:. .*-, > *:?> A ~ r .%$* , .j ~ .-* - . . . - ' . I...... .. - .,L" -r;-;- . ~- ~ - - - - - ~ - - -, -~~ - - - - -~ -- --- ~~ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~~

    *~ -* .- . . . - - .-..F, - - .a , - - . . . . .

    ~ - - ~ ~ - .-2+ . - . - . &.

  • . . . the maintenance of &xisting s o r i a l s t r u c t u t - c , the "st~bilization" of the economy, and the expansion of silver through the building of t h e r a i l w a ' y ~ . ~ ~

    The Liberal Party (1899-1920) completed the prdjcct t l f .

    - linking all the -inip~rt'ant-e~~onnm~r art.as ' t~f t h i - a X l t iplaTio---. -

    - -.

    with the western outlet to the sea. Ironically, the , l , ~ b t ? r , i l s

    had come to power as a Federal pzqty--with s u t ~ s t a n t i a l

    their predecessor^.^^

    The Liberals' policy decislon were hasp$ on csped~ency.

    Bolivia's eronamic strengths in thr dr~cadec , pr-lor- t c ~ t h r a I

    - - -cZ-kac o -Was lay - w i k h n4-:~p3&- UP, :2 t- .& h A ~ + & f - i G i+ /" transportation s j - & t e m r e d u r c d the c.r:sts c:f pt-odur,t l o r , ,ind

    as a result strengthened Bolivia's abllity to c u m l w t ~ i ' n w

    the international market. --

    9 -- / - To The E a s t : Santa Gruz de la Sierra

    The early settlers of Santa ~ r u z r e c e ~ v e d enormous land gr#nts and, from that t i m e to the prcs~nt, h a v p maintained a fzrm of rural aristcc$rdcy ~n v ~ r t ~ u a l i 5 c ~ - lation from the rest of the world."*

    I f propcnents

    300 kilorne-t~es from -

    Cruz--250 kilometres by air iron S u r r e ,

    Cochabamba, and directly astride thr :

  • 3 f' %

    ;- 6

    _ 't - . - main r o u t e from the Altiplano to the Paraguay River--should - f -

    . have become an important agricultural and transportation.

    c e n t r e . Nothing of the scrt occurred. &

    t

    Routes

    b

    Asider from ports on the Pacific, Bolivian goods had -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- --

    -- . - u n I y thrcc p o t ~ n t i a l l y usable routes of access to world trade -3 - - -

    lanes ( ? l ap -2 ) . Spanish explorers and The

    - - spt t lflr-s 1,ioneered twc; routes between- ~olivia's Altiplano .. .

    c - r c ~ ~ c ; r d c ~ ~ ~ e r tn Tados S a n t c s , then fol1,owcd down the Marnor6 - 2, R l v e r to t h e Amazon River, and the Amazon to the Atlantic

    O C L . ~ + I I . The second also began in Cochabamha : j t crossed over

    to Santa-Qrut, ran past San Jos6 Robore, and ended at

    tlither Galba ~r Corumbd. Ships then carried travellers down

    the Pdraguay River to t h e q a n t i c . Both these routes \

    declined in importance after 4776. Instead, most travellers

    w e n t l b y a third; more southerly, route to Buenos Aires, via

    thp Argent- in^ cities of Salta and TucumAn. After independence

    this'route also declined in importance, as movement to the

    thrc t l natural tracks. The first led from Tarija to Villa

    Yontes, the second began at Sucre and extended to -

    Lagur:illas, the third originated at Cochahamba.and ended on

  • C the p I a i n s n e a r Vallegrande (tc t h e southwest of Santn

    - - - - - - - -L

    C r u . z ) . = = The c e n t r e r o u t e was c o n s i d e r e d t h e : ? a s i e s t for .- - A-

    t r a v e l l e r s , b u t a f t e r 1 9 0 0 pclitical c o n s i d e r a t i o n s ( ~ u c 3 w a s t h e C o n s e r v a t i v e s e a t of government u n t i l 1899 a n d

    r e m a i n e d s t a u n c h l y C o n s e r v a t i e e a•’ t e r t h i s dnt t? 1 c * c ~ n s ~ g n d i it

    t o d i s u s e . @ . + .

    D - - - - -

    The t r a n s p o r t a t 5 o r n e t w o r k i n t h e :last h a d imbrovr3d

    very l i t t l e by 1 9 3 2 . I n 1 9 3 1 , Bolivia ro rnp l~ t t*d a ~-n,id i 4

    b e t w e e n Cochabarnba a n d S a n t a t r u z , b u t it w a s d c s l y n ~ d t o ' -- - - - / -

    aj d t h e m o v e m e n t of t rcops t o t h e Chacc f r a n t , ' no t ' t r l . I l i3'

    civllian development. I n the south t h ~ r r was only . I s i n c j l r i

    425, kilometre r o a d b e t w e e n V ~ l l a z h n a n d V i l l a X o n t r . ~ , o f t r b r t

    nut of service because of c l i m a t i c r o n d l t l o n ~ . " ~ P t - l o t - t c r

    f 9 2 5 (\.;hen t h e a i r l i n e L l o y d A 6 r e r ) B o ~ , I ~ . ~ I drto w,33 est c * L , L I 5ht~rl --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    by t w o G e r m a n - B c l i v i a n s 6 ? 1 , e a s t - w ~ s t t r a v e l w d s e ~ t hr.1- b y

    foot

    cj r a d

    o r by mule; t r a v e l w a s i n h i b i t 1 . d by t h r . sf-c~ett 3 0 0 0 ri1c.t rra ce J . - 1

    i e n t b e t w e e n the e a s t e r n l o w l a n d s a n d tht-t A 1 t l p l a n r , .

    Santa C r u z w a s tcvelve d a l - s by m u l e f r o m Cuc-hst)drr~G.j"'

    (p resumably g i v e n good t r a l T e l l i n y w e d t h e r ) ; at t i m c s , t h ~ 0

    mcvement of gccds b e t k e e n t h e twc: cent rcs w , j s c*xt-r-r . r i (*l y

    1 9 2 8 , J u l i a n Duguid t r a v e l l e d f r o m P u e r t o S u d r c z t o S d n t d

    Cruz a n d o n t n T a r i j a . On m a n y occasi~ns, hc was shor:kr>d . --- -

  • h*+,$ ' I . m . . - - ~ - -&I . . . . . . . . . / ),. , . , - _ ~ > . ' * .. , r; ..:;:~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -. . < - I > ' : - - - - . - I-:: - - - - - ' :1- .:: 1 - , - . ' I &,? ..,- . , . .

    r , - . r-- - - --

    . . i /- .

    ,' . + p p p p - - - - - - - - p - . 3 n --

    > . , _ - - , ~ L r - - ~ - - - ~~ - - - - -- ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - -

    C .

    , - - 8 . . .

    by theg5ive ,state 0 2 the rosds over w h i c h fils pa r ty . .

    i t r a v e l l e d , t h e l a c k of p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e r e g i o n , and the

    f.

    c lhv ious f a l s e ' d e s i g n a , t ~ c j n of 'towns' f o u n d o n h i s o f f , i c i a l

    B o l i v i a n maps. San Lorenzo, f o r e x a m p l e , w a s d e s c r i b e d a s a

    t o w n : ' i ts popt l ld t . ion, h e d i s ' c o v e r e d c o n s i s ed o f o n e f a m i l y \ L

    - tot-al l i n g flve m a i l c - a r r i e r s t r a v s l l jng-- - --

    n a t i v ~ s . " ~ -

    -2 -- - -- -

    - -

    R ~ [ - . a u % e of t h e C l l f f i ~ u l t r o a d c o n d i t i o n s o f f i c i a l : p l a n s i --

    > , . , wc3r-6- drvrloppd tc; t iu l , ld a r a i l s y s t e m t o a i d dcvelopmcnt of . 3

    t h e eds tern lawlands a n d t o p r o v i d ~ a n o t h e r , o u t l e t f r c m , ,,

    R c , l 1k7i;3 api3t-t f r o m t h e P a c i f i c p o r t s . I t u r r a l d e , a ~ o l i v i a n

    - St .n , l t :~ r d u r l n g t h e 1 9 1 0 ' s a n d 3_9201s , h a s p rov ided h i s t o r i a n s . -

    . ~ t t e m p t s to ? s t a b l i s h a n eastera r a i l U l t i m a t e l y , - -

    h r : w c - ~ t i l - , P c l l i v i a developed i t s w e s t e r n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e t w o r k

    a t t h e P x p e n s e of t h e e a s t e r n l o w l a n d s ; t h e e a s t e r n r ?

    n t > t w o t - k was n c v e r huilt bccapse of h i g h c o s t estwtes a n d --, \

    -1 - pol i t i r a l r a n i f < i c a t i o n s .

    ,

    I n t h p s a s t , o n l y Cochabamba w a s l i n k e d b y r a i l

    -- -- -- - t ?*lap , 9 ) .- An extension o f t h i s l i n e ~ a n t a ~ r u z , t o be

    ' 2 ' cunpl~ted by 1 9 2 6 , v a s p b a n d o n e d a f e w k i l o n e t r e s o u t s i d e of

    h ause \ lack f u n d s .

  • /

    '/caused by of i t s l a r g e a c c u m u l a t e d f o r ~ i c y n d e b t , bu t t h e - i m m e d i a t e cause of lack of funds, was most 1 i k c l y d u ~ ' to t h e

    , '

    e x t r a o r d i n a r y p r d p c r t i o n of p u b 1 i c fu r ads h c i ng f u n n r 1 1 t d ,

    7 i n t o t h e m i l i t a r y (a prccess t h a t h a d h e g u n i n 1 9 2 1 : sec

    C h a p t e r ' 111; M i l i t a r y , B o l i v i a 1 a n d th; w e s t t a r n r a i 1 - - - - -

    n e t w o r k . "s Cochabanha W C I R r'ai 1 .;pl-vi i . c . bi>c.;rust* of t h~

    - - p l i t i c a l and r h e t o r i c a l s k i l l s o f some h i g h l y r-e lgarr{~d

    r t e n h e r s cf C o n g r e s s ( t h r s c x ~ n ~ l t ~ d r r l a ldtf- .r . ~ ) ~ - t - s l dent, r l f - - -p

    B s l i v i a , Daniel S a l a n - n c a ) , t h e f o r m a t i o n o f a n n f f . i h o r ) t 1 7 f , ,

    t -he L i b e r a l P a r t y i n yo-h.ib3nha--t.he R c p u h l l c . ~ n P.11-ty ( t - 1 1 1 1nt1i

    p a r t y from 1 9 2 0 - 3 4 - T a b l e 6 1 , a n d t h e p"ruvt:n r_.:-.:,rlr,rnlc:

    ~ n p r : r t . a n c g ~ cf t h e d r C L 3 ' s ~ . l y r i c . u l t u r t ~ . I, '

    -- - - C l ~ m a L r r , ~~nd1k1ca:~^1~rysuw*.2ecI t h ~ + ~ & L c r n s n f k h ~ - - - - - ~ - ~

    eastern t r s n s p u r t a t i a n s y s t e m s . T h e w i n t e r r ' l l n s r.ou 1 ~ 1 , i t # %

    t l n e s make ~t impcsslble tn travel a n y ~ h e r c . ~ ~ Ralr lr r,+u?&

    t h e r i v e r s t c s w e l l , a n d t r a v ~ l l e r s might h a v t ~ t c : -- -

    cvercsne a ser ies cf these n a t u r a l ohstaclrs. 111 191? , P I

    r ~ i l l t a r y u n i t on t e m p c r a r y d u t y I n 3 d n t , i Y r - u ~ w c j b f c ~ l - ~ - r . c j f ( J

    wait c21cjht r m r ~ t h ~ u r , t i l t h o r o a d s between S a n t ~ j f ' ~ - u / . ~ i r l r I

    Cschabart:lba beeark - passable + 70

    --- - - - - -- p- - - -- --

    Geoqraphy anTAqricuTture 0

    S a n t a C r u z s i t s anld low h l l l s , o n f < s r k ~ l r . , w r , ! l . - 3 r z l n e d s o i l . Y o s t cf t h e regxsr, s u r r s u n d i r ~ y t - E l r % c i t y i i

    " .

  • - -- A P - - - - - - - - --- , a r f * l a r g e g t r e t c h e s of natural grassland and low-

    'i i,

    T '!

    v ~ * g g b t a t 1 o n . 71 -Thrasc f a c t o r s . p l u s t h e 1 6 % - m t u d e - ( f+e

    ftundrf3d ntrt.rrj5) and moderate precipitation (1250 millimetres . i"

    , c y ~ n t r i l ; u t r d to a relatively pleasant, if somewhat

    U - - -- -

    6 The D e p a r t m r ~ t af Santa Cruz contalny sene of the

    f 1 r 1 6 2 5 t - I 1 l a n d j n t h e c o ~ i n t r y , I - i v a l l in9 t h r E

    i-..lj 1 cz:~ .+I-.rurtd Cochsharnba a n d t h e Yungas . Sugar cahe, F. - . . - - ---- -

    c t t r r 1 f n I 1 s and fruits grct i abundantly

    4 111 rhrl a r ~ a . ~ ? Cattle b e r e r a l s e d in huge herds sn the

    - j ~ . , ~ \ ~ ~ l ~ i r ~ d ~ 1 Z: t h r nnrth .3nd the cast. If ~t w e r e not ?or the

    1 , 5 . )f t r a r i s p o t - t a t l ~ n , t h e Department could theoretical 12

    / +1,1r '. S I ~ L ' ~ ~ J lead r t * s 3 r l i- .r 1 ! R c l lvla's agrirultural needs.

    d

    - thls-aq~-l:-d?zun f d ~ v k o p i ~ n i z - % h a n o t -6ccu ry-a spa -5% o r "ta

    h t s f r l r - L C - ; f 1 5 k r t r.h of the reylon shows. /P

    ,

    History. -

    R l . 1 l v Ian- r_:f f l c i a l ~ n t e r e s t in drveloplng the economic

    1 ~ : t ~ r ; t i , ~ 1 s f t h r . D e p r t n c n t of ~ a n t a

    .I n traced ba:k to the beginnings of the-Republic L -

    s . ' > I derad? l a t e r ? i n 1 8 3 6 , the first colony 3 - - - - - - - -- - --

    was e s t a b l i ~ h e d ~ ~ - - i n the area of the Otuquis . -- , - - - - - - - - - - - -

    R r t v : - (XA'E.' 3)--t=>- Yiguel Luis O l i d ~ n . In 1843 an official 2 r

    e r p e i i l t i ~ n s a i l e d down the Pilcomayo River in an attempt to 1

  • f i n d a route to t h + . A t l a n t i c O ~ c a n ~ ~ . Thf. t h r r t * s ~ ~ l ~ n g

    s h i p s w h i e h carried t h e e x p l o r a t i o n team wi.rt2 l . ~ s t at t 1);. ,

    -

    E s t e r o s de Patific--a h u g e , t.r-1ta.111. ~ n n c ~ ~ ~ ( r i + k l l r ~ s w . ; r m l ~ . A

    similar expedition i n 1844 also ~ n d c d I n f ~ l l u r - c : , ,-tl t hou t Jh

    I

    , ~ n c c t u y a g e W l i v i a n inmigrat l:Jn Into t hc a r e a .

    a n d parts east. 78q C o n c e s s i o r r s to p r i v a t c c n t r c t j r c : r l r b t ~ r s

    - s u f f e r e d t h e sane f a t e . F o r example, ik J u l y 1 9 0 5 , t h t . , .

  • ~ y r i c u l t u r k l producer was undermined with the c o m p l e t i o n of

    t t-hp Y i i m r ~ r f - - Y c l d c i ~ - Railway (Map 9 ) . T h e u r i g i f j a l r a i l w a y z /

    -

    f- ,er . ,~usf- of t h ~ l a c k - i i f c h p i t a l

    was a b a n d o n e d s o c n a f t e r

    a n d of s u f f i c i e n t m a r k p t s - t o -

    move. However, when.the r u b b e r

    B r a z l I i a n m a n u f a r t u r e s a n d a g r i c u l t u r a l pr :>ducts tc be b

    : r~ tu : r t cd l r r t o t h e Dfhpartment of E r n > , which was at t h a t t l m e ,

    S t j k a C r u z ' o n l y l a r g e e x t e r n a l m a r k e t for i f s n * j r l c u l t u y a l

    4 . . . ~AP f a s t e r and more rellable rall l l n k s b e t w e e n - t h e a1 t l p l a n c an:? the P a r i f l c P a r t s e n c o u r a g e d i m p o r t - ,it ttjn t>f cheaper g m d s a d confirmed Eollvla's des lg- - -- -- r t , i t l r > n a s a P a c ~ f ~ c state despite its less of a Far-1 f ii' -- seaboa rd . , , 8 2 - - - - - - --- -

    Wht-w L'3 P a z d l d nct ccne thfrcugh with its promised

    1 I l n e b e t w r e n C32habanba and Santa Cruz in the 1 9 2 0 ' s r a 3

    - .

  • Cruz; rebellions occurred I n 1922 and 1 9 2 4 , t h e I a t t r t - n f

    t e n d e n c i e s were s o s t r o n g t h a t In 1 9 2 5 C t - u c c h o s w c r t U s s ~ i l d t o

    s j ng t h e A r g e n t i n e n a t. i o n a 1 a n t hcni-- i ndc~r*d, h,rd b t * t x r l (-10 I r l g l

    so frir fifty years, 0 5

    -- D u r i n g the late 1 9 2 0 ' s only a \.cry few c . ~ v i 1 t , r n

    . ~ - ~ - - - - - - -~ -c - ~ --p---p-----------p- I ) c p a r t r , w n t of S a n t a Cruz , a n d 1.t.s 1c)cat.i o r ) ;~S!FT- J d , + t hc. m t j o r -

    p o p u l s t i o n i n c r e a s e d v e r y little u p t o 3932 ( T a t ) l t . 7 ) .

    " O n l y s i n c e t h e rarly 1 9 5 0 's Have s i g n i f j c a n t a n d r : r r r l s ~ \ t ;ant-

    efforts been made to deve lop t h e a rea t S a n t a C r u ~ l *

    e c o n c m i c a l l y . " R 7 T h i s n r y 1 ~ c : t , mow t h d n . i n y o t h r * r - r b v r c i r * r ~ t . c ~ ,

    t u r n , implies that the y o v e r n , m e n t s wcrr n o t scrlnuhly

  • decades a f t e r t h e War cf t h e T r i t 7 l c l A ? 1 i a n r i . , ( 1878-1904

    t s g e t h e r wit.h a n analysis of river conditions y ~ a r - r t j u n d . 1.

    ' ~ s s u r n e t h e y would be 1 itt l c . d i f f ~ r c n t i n t htt y t % a r - s i x ~ t w c - t ~ n

    1 9 0 0 and 1932.a9 --

    i

    - A r g e n t i n e companies c o n t r o l l r d s h i p p i rlcJ ut? L q r l ~ l I I C ~ W I I - - -

    t . h c Pa r aguay Rivel- a f t e r t h e War of the T r ~ ~ p l k ' A 1 1 i . i ~ ~ c . c . I n \, '. J

    1885 t h e r e w e r e 8-75 vesse ls s e r v l c i n c j t h e v a r i o u s p r t s ,

    r i v e r . g o Nevertheless, v e s s e l s w i t h a d r ~ f t rjrtl;tt f ' t - t !I,III t w t ,

    metres r a r e l y vr-nt u r e ~ d u n t h c P,j t - . ~ g u a y N i vrr-; . i l : c : v t >

    f I ~ U I - F ~ ~f 2 . 2 m e t r(>s f( :r t h e maximum di-l)t h [ I f w , ~ l t . 1 < i t

    A s u n c i b n u n d p r n o r m a l c o n d l t i o n s . g' T l ~ e 2 . 2 r w t r + r f i cj~tr-a

    t h e i r c a r g o c , a p a c i t y is r e s t r r ~ t e d . ~ "

    o n J y be n a v i g a t e d f o r littlp marc th;in s i x rn:,r~th:-, of t h e

    1 i m i t a t i o n f o r a nat i o n d e p e n d i n g o n a n o u t 1 c . t I J ~ t l l f * t l [ ) p c . l '

    e a s i l y undrrsl ood . P u e r t c Si1;1rr7, r 3 s t ah1 i stl(-d ~n 1 8 7 7 , b

    - f a i l e d after the Chaco War."5 Fuet - t r~ Q u i j,jrrci f 200 k ~ 1 o t w . t rc.5

  • nclrt h o f P I I C T ~ C ~ SuArr -~7- - - see M A ~ 1 0 ) , b111 I t t w e n t y - f i ve y e a r s . -- -

    I n t r r , ~ n 1 9 0 0 , w e n t i n t o l i q u i d a t i o n i n 1 9 3 1 . 9 6 N o t e t h a t 1

    Q ~ l i j , l t t r o dabs not apppar i n T d h l r 7 , and P u r r t o S u b r e z

    r f : n . l i n s o n l y a m i n o r po r t for t h e h a n d l i n g o f B o l i v i a n g o o d s .

    Srmr m t j r- i t i m f l t r n f f ic: u s e s t h e Pa r , lguay R i v e r - . T h e __-_- -- -

    R r & < i 1 i a n r - 1 t i t . s of CnrurnbA ( t e n k i l o m e t r e s cast of P u e r t n

    d ~ p t h t o p t - o v l d ~ a n a l t e r n a t i v e r o u t e f o r rre expor t s f r o m

    1r)ntj d t.stsncr:; f r:>m -th-e A l t i p l a n o a n d road c o n d i t i o n s i n

    t ht. 1 n w 1;lnil.i. T h r s s f a r t o t - s , I assump, w e r e known t o

    Cheap R i c h e s

    Tn g e n e r a l , d n y o f f i c - i a l B o l i v i a n i n t e r e s t i n t h e

    nat i o n 5 f X a s t e t - n l a n d s c e n t r e d on v a l u a b l e , e a s i l y -,

    r*s t*1-,4c.t a b l ~ , r o s o u r c . e s . Thc q u i n i n e bcom ( 1 8 4 0 - 7 0 ) in C , ~ u ~ ~ : ~ l i c : d n (above L a k e T i t i c a c a I g 7 a n d Coc:habamba",nd

    t h~ I r n ( 1880-1 91 2 1 i n Acre j n t h e D e p a r t m e n t of - - - - - - -

    R c n i I n n o r t h e r n Rolivia, attracted l a r g e numbers o f private

    l e s s r r number from C o c h a b a m b a ended up in t h e Benig9).

    i;r~ve;-nmt-nt: a n d p r i v a t e i n t e r ~ s t in t h e east o n l y l a s t e d

  • until the riches ran o u t I c p i n l n t - 1 or thr t r x r - r - i t r j r y ~ , i s - - - - -

    -

    lost (as the Eeni was to Brazil . I o n T h c Dt.p,~rtmc-nt o f S.qnt,a

    C r u z n e v e r e n j o y e d a s i m i lsr e c o n o m i c boom. (.

    -7

    I t i s clear t h a t , w l t h t h e except i o n o f t ht. f > , ~ s t ~ t - r ~ d e p a r t m e n t s , t h e q u c s t ion of A C 1-r-. t ouc-ht'ci (! I ) 1 y marginally un national [ R c J ~ i v i a n l l l f ~ . . . I n 1

    Those. wri te r s whn s u p + t t t hca '11 t c . 1 n, l t I vt l P o r t t Itt>ol-y - - -- - -- -

    - - --

    advance 1 ittl; e v i d e n c e to pt-nvt? R n l l v l a h , - l r l .I SP t- 1 O I I S . ~ r l r - l

    consistent c o n c e r n f o r its cast r t . n l L t r i r 3 5 1,) l o t t ( 1 l O 3 2 .

    its neiyhbours; this vulnerability, it is ,ircjac.c-l, ( - 1 - c A a i t r . r l , 1 1 1

    alternativq was a port o n o'ne of thc n,~viyablc r 1 v r : r ~ in - - -

    d r i v e t o the e a s t ; this t h e ~ r y prposps t h a t ~ o l i v ~ a ' % - -

  • c o n c l u s i o n of t h e War of t h e Pacific. - . r,,, p o s s r * s s i c s n d ' u n port utilisable sur l e r l o Paraguay '

    r e p r 4 g ~ n t a i t e n e f f e t pour l a B o l i v i e un i m p 4 r a t i f ; 1 1 ~ ~ 0 1 8 Idfter the War of t h e P a r i f ~c 1 .Io3

    Jns6 Fst : i y a r r i b i s , P a r a g u a y a n Army C h i e f o f S t a f f

    forr-.t* t h c I s n d of w h i c h s h e had b e e n deprlvcd [ A t a c a m a l ,

    R n 1 I V I ~1 t. h ( * n snugh t : o u t a c o r n p e n s a t ic-~n somewhere e 1 se

    i A 1 thotlcjh t h ~ a r g u m e n t for t h e P ; l t ~ r n a t i v e P o r t Theory-

    i s w c ? d k , $ < : m e P V ~ ~ P ~ T ' E ~ p r e s c n t c d I n $ h a t s ~ c t i o n - - t h a t

    r 7 n n l - . ~ r n i n y , f o r i n s t a n c e , t h e early exploration of Bolivia's *

    r j i ) v r 5 r n m e n t - - r a n G c ust-11 t o u n d e r m i n e t h e War of t h e P a c i f i c

    ' I ' l ~ ( - t ~ r y , 4 l o w l c v t ~ l o f g o v e r n m e n t - i n t e r e s t i n a Chaco port

    r x i s t c ~ d p r i o r t o t h ~ War o f t h e P a c i f i c ; more i m p o r t a n t l y , a

    I l r i s I n t t>rt .st d i d , n o t increase drdrnat . lcalJy a f t e r R o l i v i a '

    l o s t ,i t s P a c i f ir p o r t s .

    l i i l a c k of i n t e r e s t i n t h e q c o a f t e r t -he ~ i r

    r o n r t 2 r n s t - h r activities of B o l i v i a n e n t r e p r e n e u r Miguel i

    Sm51-t.2 A r a n a ; t h e sc rond , R o l i v i a ' s c o n t i n u i n y i n t e r e s t i n

    t h c T a c n a - A r i c a n e g o t i a t i o n s b e t w e e n C h i l e and P e r h .

  • In 1079 -80 Bolivia lost t h c War of t h ~ P a c i F ~ ~ y .

    round 1877 Mi-guel SuArez Arana; ,* trucrfir*, bur I t . *

    Puerto SuArez , a few ki lometres d i s L a n t f r - ~ l n ~ t h r Dr. ,+ , . 1 1 l ~ r l Y

    --- t.vwn of CorumbA (Map 1 0 1.. lo" Th is port- , which W ~ S 'to s t - r w t h - --

    ,

    as a terminal for the shipment of goods from t h ~ n e p ~ r t m r n t

    af Santa Cruz , s o o n p r o v e d uselcss becdusc. the c*hanllc*l whlc .h

    t h e upper P a r a g u a y R i v e r wh j c h h a d t h e rcclu i s i t I-- l ) h y c i l c 7 < l 1

    i n n u n d a t e d r m s t of t h e a rea .loH

    \ - from his own government in 1875 , I"" P a r a . j \ ~ ; j y l,j.-+vc r w r - m I xs I IJII

    Paraguayan g o v f 2 r n m r n t d v s p i t e i y n c ~ r i n y i t s prav 1 so%. d r wS9 wrong: in 1 8 8 7 , as described i n s - C h d p t e r I T , P t l rdglray

  • SuArcr A r a n a ' s p ro jec t t o develop a p o r t o n t h e I

    r J ~ r r . , j ~ ~ c i y R i v e r w a s t e n - years in t h e planning (it b e g a n

    s n m ~ t lme p r i o r t o 1875) .'I2 A l t h o u g h t h e e v i d e n c e i s n o t i --

    -- -- P.~chr.cr_r w a s l o s t , ' ~ o l i u i a did n o t e s t a b l i s h anather p u r t o n - - -- --

    t f r r * t',r r , t r juay H l v e r ur1t.i 1 P u e r t r : Qui j a r r o (discussed above) j n

    1 9 0 0 . ~ t & t : h e r off i c i d 1 R o l i v i a n c o n c e s s i o n s d e s i g n e d t o

    % t I r r 1 \ 1 1 , ) t r * t h t b dt.v~ln~mcnt of r o m m u n i c a t i o n s a n d movement cf

    \'\

    R o l ~ v i a o f f i r i a l l y s i g n e d a w a y a y l e g a l r i g h t s t o . -

    R n l l v i , ~ ' s a l l y r n t h e War of t h e P a c i f i c , n e v e r r

    i t 5 ( . l , ~ i r n s t o o w n e r s h i p of t e r r i t o r y l o s t in t h e

    r h i l ~ . As a r o n s e y u e n c e , Pe rh b e c a m e e m b r o i l e d i n

    t - o n r r i ~ ~ g d i t ) l o m a t i c a n d political d i s p u t e w i t h C h i l e - - t h e

    ' l? ,3rnLl-Ar r ( - a C o n t r o v e r s y . R i g h t f r o m the beginning P e r u and---

    r h i 1 t- r~t~c.t>unt~t-trd g r ~ j ~ t dif f i u u l t i e s i n theim at terhpts t o - -- -

    come t n a c o n s e n s u s o n t h e c o n d i t i o n s f o r a p l e b i s c i t e i n

    thc. t l i sput i ~ d t t 3 r r i t o r - y t o determine ownership (an integral >

    pa r t of t h e 1883 peace t r e a t y b e t w e e n Per t5 a n d C h i l e ) , a n d

  • - -- - - -

    these reheated f a i l = ~ gave h n p r t o ~ o l i v i , 3 , wh i r>h had b~c.11

    exc luded f rom t h e o r i g i n a l T a c n a - A r i c a d i s c u s s i o n s , t h a t i t i.

    a t l eas t o n e of t h e P a c i f i c pjrts l o s t durir i t j t h ~ W,+Y o f t h r ~

    P a r i f ic.lI4

    - - --

    B o l i v i a ' s i n t e r e s t i n Tacna-Arlca, was p u q h r d I n t n t l l ~

    a f t e r 1 8 8 4 , b u t re-emerged w l t h t - h r l q 0 4 , - l d j u s t n ~ c . n t t r ) t h c

    t 1895 t r e a t y . T h c 2 0 Oct- r ,bc . r 1904 T r t l a t y ~ l f T ' r * , i c . t . , F ' t - 1 r.nd\Il 1 l ,

    ' ~ n d C o m m e r c e p r o v i d e d B o l i v i a w i t h an ~ n d r m n i by o f

    --

    opposition. I n a n y e v e n t , C h i l r ~ r e f u s c d t o "Ztfy the* 13114

    t r e a t y further.l17 9

  • b e in(: l u d e d i n t G n r j u i n g Tacrra-Arica c o n c i l i a t i o n . I n / - .

    * 1921 t h e J,c!ayut> ( w h i c h w a s mc,rlitoriny t h e d i s c u s s i o n s ) i

    t-uvnrd down t h i s r e q u e s t , s t a t i n g t h a t t h e c o n d i t i o n s of t h e

    1 w 4 C h i I r a - R o l ~ v i d t r c a t y r x c l d e d B o l i v i a f ram f u r t h e r Y ~ n t e r f > s t i n the area.llB

    -

    I n 3 9 2 3 , t h e P n l t e d States i n i t i a t e d i n t e r n a t i o n a l

    s ~ ~ t j l ~ t r - t fo r k 1 1 i v i , i n dPmands f o r a p o r t o n t h e P a c i f i c

    Owan. ~ ~ P S P L ~ P S ~ ~ ~ K N S i~dividwa& ef f 0 ~ f 3 ~ ( V . S . Secre tary - - -

    { I T St,it ,cJ Frdnk Re1 logy, f o r e x a m p l e ) , by 1 9 2 7 t h e s e h d

    f , 1 1 l t ~ : l . " 1 9 R o t h C h i l p < ~ n d P c r h i gno red A m e r i c a n a p p e a l s f o r > - syrttlfrt l ly f ( : r no1 i n ' s c; i~~se. Thc f I n a l C h i l e - P p ~ . u accord i n

    t h r T a c n a - A r i c a d i s p u t e was s i g n e d o n 28 J u l y 1 9 2 9 . I t w a s a '

    ~ I I J ~ E , 1 1 1 (rw t I) R o l lv1 '3n h o p e s , a n d may e x p l a i n , i n p a r t , t h e - - - - -- - - - -- -- -- -- --- - -- -- - - - -- -- -

    : , c ~ t ~ n t r-y ' ci ~ic-t i c ~ n s ac ja ins t P a r a g u a y af trr- 1 9 2 3 . d

    S1rrc.r. 1 9 1 0 R o l ~ v i a r ~ o f f i c i a l s have r o n t i n u c d

    ( 1 i s [ - u s q i c ~ n s w i t h C h i l e a n d p e r & over t h i s q u e s t i o n , T h r o u g h

    1 9 7 5 .I ntrmbc-1- .>f s r h e m r s had h e e n s u g g e s t e d as a s o l u t i o n t o

    Rulivla's problem'.121 A s yet t h e r e h a s b e e n n o t r i l a t e r a l

    .1!1 t -c . t *n i t -n t (P t= r -B anti C h i I c m u s t b o t h a g r e e o n a c o u r s e of

    Rol i \ . l , 3 h a s nt-vct- l o s t s i g h t . o f its u l t i ' m a t ~ ,

    c)h jwt i v e . T ~ P n a t i o n ' s d i p l o m a t i c i n t e r e s t i n t h e Chaco

    b t ~ t w t - t b n 1879 a n d 1 9 2 9 w a s minute by c o m p a r i s o n t o i t s

  • . " '.

    - - - - -- -

    )s " - I n t c s r t l s t - i n t-hc Tacna-Aric-,) d i s c u s s i o n s . I.; 1 t -I n r .c ,mpi r t .s t ltt-.

    -

    ir

    v . t w c ) : ' l i s ~ ~ u t ~ y : 9

    "'t 'his t h e r : ~ is .1 rnLl j o t - iwsut-. i n 3 0 i r f : : r . c . ~ g r ~ t . 1 - 1 , i t r t ~ t ~ s

  • -- - - --- - -- - - - - - -

    i n n r e d s e . T h a t ' t h e h'ar of t h e p a c i f i c Theory , was & d e c i s i v e

    c a u s a l facgor i n t h e e v e n t s l e a d i n g t o t h e Chaco War is even

    The Military's Role in the Chaco

    This t h r o r y propuses 1-hart the ~ c : l l v i a n a n d P a r a g u a y a n +-. - - - - - - - -- .I

    d 3 1 1 l t a r y wpm prlnarily r e s p c n s i b l e f o r t h e escalation of

    21 ~ ~ l t , r * r d t i r . t r ~ r i s i o n s cvcs r the. C!h;=co to f ull-scale war.

    P r - , ~ ~ ~ ~ , r i c - ~ : ~ t < c,f thg-= t h p o r y imply t h a t each n i l i t a r y -- --- - - - - - - .;=

    c s t t ' $ 1 : l I !-,fjmf-r)t. ~ $ 3 5 4 r . t i n y r s s s c n t i a l l y ip r l t . pcnden t l l - of t h e 1

    .L p : , l ~ t i . . a - l + s y s t e m :lf 1 t s akn c o u n t r y . +

    Paraguay ' f @ . . . 5 r a l t ~ v z t n t ~ ~ r n n Ids C O ~ S ~ L ' L I C C ~ ~ ~ ~ S f p a r a y u a y a s l

    d P V I I l a H d y r s , P u t ' r t o Sas t re , ~ u e f - t ~ ~ ~ h s d d i . F u e r t e f ) l ~ ~ o y o t r o s . . . I y l 10s fortines G a l p h , . u a t r i a . - -% - -9L-- --- -

    t I PI*: :,r;:mayc: ~ a r i e r o n nt r o s ~ P S ~ C : S h a c l a los, F s t e : - o s de q a t ~ i i o . . . : . . . Pat-

    * R I 1 I ~ 7 i A r l . l Z 4 I

    P a r a y u n y a n nllltary aetisns prlor t o 1932 helped

    : . , , i f i+ t h e * : - c : n d l t l o n s w h i c h l e d to w a r . - - N c t u n e x p e c t e d l y , --

    8 . 2 1 ~ ~ ~ - l a > h l u t n r ~ a n s n a ~ ~ t a i n their coentry's a z t i v i t i e s in

    T h e Rsllvldn h l s t o r l a n s ' ~ n c i i l c t r n e n t , ~ f P a r a g u a y ' s

    Tarayuay's attack c n Pi ter to Pacheco i n -- - - --

    ;.-';.ad?, a t B a h f a ? e g r a , of Bolivian

  • 1900's--an a c t i o n whi=.h f o r c e d Bolivia to a t t - ~ n p t

    *

    This is a s t r z n y b i l 1 :>f in:?l::tr?c_.~-lt. : ior . ,c thd. l : - i , i , , .

  • 1922-3 a n d a very serious 'civil w a r ensued. Those a r m s not

    ~ C J R ~ i n the f r c j h t l n y kerf-' i n c o r p o r a t e d intc t h e a r sena l oaf,

    I-'- t h e r ~ r r w d forces. Iz7= Paraguay's t-11 ltary a c t i o n s , a t i'

    V , l r t g ~ i ~ j r d 1 ,I w r r r . t hr: r c * s u l t cf loca l f r u s t r a t i o n ; t h e attack "

    cjl 1 . T h e gtA;v~rnnt-ant ::f Porc3gucrl. d 1 d riot :-r

  • ~ e n r n k r k , France, a n d C r c < a t ~ r i t , ~ i n . ' 3 3

    F a r a g u a y a n response; E n y l i s h notr-(3 t h . j t P L ~ r a ~ t ~ ~ i ~ a y ~ , t . LO!. 1 ( I -

    -

  • F ' r a n r * t * 2 2 Scpt r i r tbcr 1 9 2 7 where he w a s c o m p l e t i n g a d d i t i o n a l

    u f f i c e r t r a i n i n g ] . . . I o u l d ' v e r i f y d i r e c t l y t h e a l m o s t P d

    c.onrplete d h s e n c e of a l l kinds' of preparations f c r t h e defence

    r j f t h e Ch;lc:o , . , n x a O L u i s V i t t ~ n e l ~ ~ a n d A n t o n i o

    w r n t r . c!xr:r=l l r w t h i s t o r i c a l w o r k s a f t e r w a r d s on t h e i r

    r c l l i r l ! t y ' r , t ~ f f r i r t s h ~ f n r ( * and d u r i n g t h e Char.

  • - -- - - -- z

    P a r a g u a y ' s military remained f ragment-bd and d l s o r y a n i x c d ; -

    after 1925 its artivities in t h e Chapo were r c s t r a i n c d by

    gnvernrnent decisicns. T h i s c o n r l u s i o n i s r r x - i nfor-c-t-d.

    by evidence c o n c e r n i n g Bolivia's military that will b t . '

    p r ~ s e n t e d i n t h e fa1 Iowj n g scrt ~ r ~ n .

    b r u t a . . . " I u 7 ; w i t h R o l i v i a n . a u t h o r s w h ( o vlrw i t 9 n

  • I . ' -

    R r l l iv ia ' r - ; a r m y i s p a r t l y t o b l a m e f o r t h e e n s u i n g r- 8

    c.r,r~f-l it;t . h ' r v e r t - h e l r s s , I s h a l l a r g u e t h a t i t s a c t i v i t i e s , ~ ~ . r r t . l r . . u l ; ~ r l y t h e l a s t a c t i n the Zhaco d r a m a , w e r e f o r t h e ,

    r L I , ~ r t the. r - cnsu l t I-:f p c ; l l t i r a l d c c i s j o n s . A brief h i s t o r y

    -- rrf t h r Bo 1 . r v i ,~n ~ + r n r d f o r c e s r l e a r l y d e m o n s t r a t e s t h i s . - --- - --

    T h e War c)f t h r l P a c l f l r : d i s c r e d l t c d t h c B o l i v i a n - - -

    -

    < i r - m y . Tts r c b l r t h b e y n r ~ unde r P r e s i d e n t A r c e when h e

    e s t c i b l l s h i . d a new Y i l i t a r y C o l l e g e i n Suc re In 1891.150 I n

    t t r r : I ,* ! r n 1 8 8 0 ' s t h e army r e c e i v e d s m a l l a r m s a n d a r t i l l e r y a, -

    f r r i n ~ f t - r ~ r n t h c G e r m a n f l r m of h'rupp t o replace t h e s u b s t a n t i a l

    I r i s ~ t . ~ I n r u t - r r d clur i n g t .hp War of t h e P a c i f i c . Despite

    P I 1 . ( S o n d i t i c n s were l i t t l c d i f f e r e n t f r o m t h e ~ ~ t - t ~ v 1 ~ 1 1 s d e c n d ~ w h e n t h e r e had b e e n no 3 b l i t - i a n m i l i t a r y

    t c5slx;nht> t - i j P ~ ~ r C > i j r l a y c ~ n f o r c . r ~ s l a s s a u l t o n Puerto F a c h e c o i n L

    10871 . D u n k r r l e y s t ~ t r s t h a t o n s e v e r a l o c c a s i o n s P e r h was

    T ~ P 1898-9 ::anFalyn I n A c r e d r a m a t i c a l l y d e m o n s t r a t e d

  • the Bolivian army's i n ~ f fcct ivcncss. T h c D t b p , 3 mt*nt afi F v n l r contained some df the-richest rubbrr- p r o d u c l n r j a t . c .3~ in t he -

    w o r l d . I n t h e l a t e 1 8 9 0 ' s Fr-,3zi 1 i a n '2nd P r r t ~ v l ~ l r ~ I

    entrepreneurs, who made up t h e majority ( I • ’ t he kwpul,it i o n

    latter a s k e d their government fcr- m i 1 i t.31-y a l d , , t r l c l c , t r ~ t ) , +

    small B o l i v i a n unit P c;$nt t o t h e f r-ont. . 'rtlrh I I : ~ I tc,

    ,-i:-s.::rilpl l ~ , h e . : ' l l i t t 16. t h p shcl - t t ~ r r c * t I l r b j w c X ~ . r b i t ( 1 1 1 0 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 I I r, t h e n o r t h , t t i i n g o u t n u r n b e r ~ d a n d o u t f : ) ~ ~ ( j h t - ; t i t i . \ c , l t l 1 t - l - . t

    s u p p o r t e d the 1,; b r r a l r;lusr_. ( m o s t c:f t h c . c , ! 1.1). t l ' i d \ ~ r y l l j o r - t t . r l

  • - - - - - - - - - - - - A- --A -- - - -- -- -

    Aft.cr 1 9 0 0 , new b a r r a c k s , s c h o c ~ l s , a n d arms replaced

    P ryui~mcnt l o n g obsolete. There was a semi-successful 1

    ~ ~ t - t m y ~ ' t-o c r l r r ~ l l Quechua and AymarA I n d i a n s into t h e

    E r j r r * r . An w. ldemia cle Guerr-a a n d in t e n d e n c o e n e r a l de - ' 1 - c s t - a h 1 1 s h e d , rtnd t h e Colegio ~ i l i t a r moved to

    - - - -- LA P a z from O r u r u . Five military zones were created: L a P a z ,

    o t I - h i , P o t . o s l -Chuqui saca , T a r i jci-Santa Cruz-Renr ,,

    ~ + n d t h c n s t - t . . h - w e s t e r n c o l o n i e s .155 *

    r-clnt i n u r i d to improve the a r m e d f o r c e s . The E s t a d o Mayor

    c ; c ' / ) r . 1 . , 3 1 WSS ri-~;3tc1d, r o n s c r l p t i o n w a s l e g i s l a t e d i n 1 9 0 7 ,

    I - L J 11.5 g i ~ v e t - n i n g r e t i rernpnt a n d promot i o n were r e d r a w n , a

    Germ.3n rheapons w r r e a c q u i r e d i n 1 9 0 7 ( a g a i n from Krupp) .

    I n 1905 Yluntes gave a four-year [:ontract t-o G e n e r a l

    ! 1 l t t ' 5 . I q 7 A n u f f i c ial German m i s s i o n , c o n t r a c t e d b y M c n t e s '

    ,- when he w a s Bolivia's Ambassador to Germany, r e p l a a d t k

    Frr-nr-h ~ r t 1911. T h e m i s s i o n returned to G e r m a n y i n 1 9 1 4 when

  • w a r b r c k e out i n E U ~ C ~ C , ~ ~ " h d l - i n 9 improvcd some . dspects o f

    Bolivia's military structure,

    T h e greates t c h a n g e s d u r i n g thc p e l - l u d 1 9 0 0 - 2 0 , ~ ~ . c ~ s r

    I f rnm t h e p o l i c y , pushed ~ n e r g e t i c a l l y by. M[-)rites, o f e

    g a r r i s o n i n g B o l i v i a ' s o u t l y i n g r e x j i c l n s . l g " F c ) l - t inr l s - wt.1-th - 2 - - - -

    established in a n u m b e r of a reas i n eastern H o l i c r ~ , l .J -%

    ( T a h l r 8 ) . T h e g r e a t e s t r . o n c t 3 n t r a t i u n

  • frontiers CIS w e l l a s t h m a o r - - -- - -- - Wt ltipianu c r n t r r s - in a d d i t i o n , many of t h e c o l o n i z a t i o n p r o j e c t s t h e a r m y w a s

    s u p p o s f ~ d t . t ~ p r - o t c ~ t had not m a t e r i a 1 i z e d . However, t h e yr>vt . . rnment i : h . ~ r ~ y e ~ t o t h e m i l i t a r y s t r u c t u r e o u t l i n e d a b o v e

    fl,?lt,rsd t h i h d e e l i n ~ . A f t c r 1995 t h e s t r c n y t h of t h e m i l i t a r y

    dnd numkwr of f o r t i n e s s t e a d i l y increased.

    T h e government c - o n t r o l l e d t h i s i n i t i a l B o l i v i a n

    n ; ~ 1 i t a r y p e n e t r a t i o n of the C h a c o . F o r i n s t a n c e , i n 1 9 1 2 ,

    w t w n t h e hnrrn+~jc 6% q x x + ~ - ti* tft Paraguay becane se-F~OUS r --- - v

    <

    . . . por c o n s i g u i e n t e l a s r e l a c i o n e s d i p l o m a t i c a s s f . p u s i ~ t - v r ~ v i d r i o s a s y era prcciso t o m a r m e d i d a s d e : - a t . J t . t ~ r r n i l i t a r . E l p r e s i d e - n t e V i l l a z d n r e s o l v i b fluvr,, e n p r e v i h i o n d c f u t u r o s a c g n t e c i m i e n t o s e n v i a r , + l y i i n o s cderpos de l i n e a a l a s f r o n t e r a s d e l O r k e n t e

    1 6 3 1, d i . 1 ~ u d c & r? . .

    ';m This g r a n ose p l a n e v l p o r a t e d a t t h e o u t b r e a k o f h ~ ~ r I tl w , ~ F ' L , T ~ ~ army rc~main 'ed a small f ~ t - c e ( a p p r o x i m a t e l y

    -1.. _ -- 2900 o f f i c ~ r s a n d m e n ) 1 6 4 u s e d f o r i n t e r n a l po l i ce d u t y

    Tn 1 9 2 0 t h e r e w a s a n o t h e r g o t h e ~ e p u b l i c a r n - - . . . - - a - _ I _

    ' b - d

    ~ a a v e d r ' 3 ( 1 9 2 0 - 5 ) b r i e f l y set up a ' R e p u b l i c a n Guard'16" *

    .9 - - tt: cm%nt.er army i n f lttertce OR t he palit~es cf the nat ion . -

  • I n 1 9 2 1 , S a a v e d r a elevated C,olnne l Hans f i a n d t to t h t a E

    r a n k &f 6 ~ n e r - a 1 and handcd h im thc. ~ ~ c ~ s t o f C c ? m m a n d t - r - i n - d \

    Chief of t h e B o l i v i a n A r m e d Fnrr-+c-s. Ih'undt had hr*,rldt>d t h~ - ----- -

    o r i y i n a l G e r m a n m i l i t a r y n i l b s i c n of 103 1 - 4 , 11r.forc. '.

    r e . t u r n i n g t o h i s home c r ~ u n t r y eo f i g h t i n t h i - C ; r t x ~ t W a r . & - -.. " Whif e commanding v a r l o u s u n l t s o n t h r ~ ~ 1 s t r - t - 1 1 f t - c l r r t 1