Upload
meh-ran-rashid-zad
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 TPR_07
1/2
Andrea Molina & Mary Balla EDU540-906 RobbinsMethods Acting Assignment
October 1, 2007
Total Physical Response (TPR)
Historical Overview: TPR was developed by Dr. James Asher. While the
concept of associating language with motor activity was not new, Asherformalized TPR as a method in 1977, after over a decade of study. It isbased upon principles of child language acquisition, in which the childgives physical responses when listening to language. TPRs ultimateinstructional goal is to teach oral proficiency and conversationalfluency. The emphasis is not on text or other media, but initially onvoice, action and gestures. Instruction is given in target languageonly.
Theory:
Building from the ideas of various other theories, such as tracetheory, TPR recognizes the value of language being associatedwith physical responses.
Follows a grammar-based view of language that focuses onmeaning, not form.
Based upon principles of child language acquisition, whichproposes that the human brain has a set pattern for learninglanguage.
Founder/Proponents: Developed by Dr. James Asher in 1977, afterexperimenting with the method in the 1960s.
Instructional Goal: To produce conversationally fluent learners, withfocus on meaning, not form.
Unique Points:
Reduces anxiety of language production in the learner
Builds confidence by instant success in understanding targetlanguage
Uses language/body conversation at beginning stages
CONCLUSION
Strengths of Method:
Allows students to get up and move while learning andencourages a more relaxed learning environment that can easilyincorporate humor
Helps retention by associating movement with words
Weaknesses of Method:
Not as effective in higher levels of language learning
8/6/2019 TPR_07
2/2
Andrea Molina & Mary Balla EDU540-906 RobbinsMethods Acting Assignment
October 1, 2007
Does not promote independent language use outside of oral workmodeled by teacher in classroom
Learner needs for unrehearsed language not always met
Evaluation: Assessment types compatible with the method includeevaluation of student actions and gestures when given non-writtenprompt, eventually moving towards student composition.
LESSON INRODUCTIONTopic: NumbersObjectives: SWBAT count to ten in target language and identifynumbers one through ten out of order.Language Level: 1st year Spanish
SOURCES: Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching By Principles: An Interactive Approach toLanguage Pedagogy. 3rd Ed.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.