Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Toxicity of the Aqueous and Ethanol Extracts of Ginger
(Zingiber officinale L.) Rhizome and Henna (Lawsonia inermis
L.) Leaves on Mosquitoes (Anopheles and Culex) Larvae
Ahmed Eldokhri Ahmed Adam
B.Sc. (Hons.) in Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of
Dalanj, (2013)
A Dissertation
Submitted to the University of Gezira in Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of
Science
in
Biosciences and Biotechnology (Biosciences)
Center of Biosciences and Biotechnology
Faculty of Engineering and Technology
October, 2015
2
Toxicity of the Aqueous and Ethanol Extracts of Ginger (Zingiber officinale L.)
Rhizome and Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) Leaves on Mosquitoes (Anopheles and
Culex) Larvae
Ahmed Eldokhri Ahmed Adam
Supervision Committee:
Name Position Signature
Dr.: Mutaman Ali Abdalgadir Kehail Main Supervisor …………………….
Dr.: Abdalla Ibrahim Abdalla Co-Supervisor ……………………
Date: September, 2015
3
Toxicity of the Aqueous and Ethanol Extracts of Ginger (Zingiber officinale L.)
Rhizome and Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) Leaves on Mosquitoes (Anopheles
and Culex) Larvae
Ahmed Eldokhri Ahmed Adam
Examination Committee:
Name Position Signature
Dr. Mutaman Ali Abdalgadir Kehail Chairperson …………………..
Prof. Elamin Mohamed Elamin External Examiner …………………..
Dr. Faiza Elgily Internal Examiner ……………………..
Date of Examination: /September/2015
4
Dedication In the name of Allah the merciful, the compassionate
With thank to my god I dedicate this work to:
To my beloved father and Mother
To my decent Brothers and Sisters
To my beloved colleagues To my sincere friend
To my family
5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
First, I render Plentiful thanks and praise to Allah the Most
Merciful, for having given me patience, strength and health to
accomplish this work.
Specific thanks to my main Supervisor Dr. Mutaman Ali
Abdelgadir Kehail, for his keen supervision, sound advises; also
plentiful thanks are due to my Co- Supervisor Abdalla Ibrahim Abdalla
for his remarkable support and continuous help.
Thanks are due to my mother and Father. I am also indepted to my
brathers for their continuous encouragement, creation of most suitable
condition, invariable assistance and moral support which encouraged me
for accomplishing this study.
I am also thanks to all my colleagues in Centre of Biosciences and
Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology,
University of Gezira.
6
Toxicity of the Aqueous and Ethanol Extracts of Ginger (Zingiber officinale L.)
Rhizome and Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) Leaves on Mosquitoes (Anopheles
and Culex) Larvae
Ahmed Eldokhri Ahmed Adam
M.Sc. in Biosciences and Biotechnology (Biosciences), October 2015
Center of Biosciences and Biotechnology
Faculty of Engineering and Technology
University of Gezira
Abstract
Natural products are widely used in the fields of pharmaceutical, cosmetics and food
industries, while some of them exerted repellent or toxic effects against insect pests.
Ginger rhizomes and Henna leaves are of the popular materials used in the Sudanese
Homes. This study aimed at determining the toxicity (in term of LC50 and LC95) of the
aqueous and ethanol extracts of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome and Henna
Leaves (Lawsonia inermis) extracts on the larval stage of Anopheles and Culex
mosquitoes. The Ginger rhizome was brought from the Central market, Wad Medani
City, while Henna leaves were collected (fresh) from Hantoub east of Wad Medani
City also. The mosquito larvae were brought from the Insectory of the Blue Nile
Institute, University of Gezira and were used immediately in the toxicity tests. The
principles of testing the potentiality of these products (toxicity) on mosquito larvae
recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) were carefully followed.
The submission period was 24 and 48 hours. Each test was triplicates. The
calculations of LC50 and LC95 for all extracts were run using the probit analysis
statistics. The results showed that, Culex larvae were more susceptible than Anopheles
larvae towards all extracts (except the ethanol extract of Ginger). The ethanol extract
was more potent than the aqueous extract against mosquito’s larvae. Respectively, for
Anopheles and Culex larvae, the LC50’s were 199.33 mg/L and 148 mg/L (for the
aqueous extract of Ginger), 171.73 mg/L and 143.67 mg/L (for the ethanol extract of
Ginger), 618.45 mg/L and 538.77 mg/L (for the aqueous extract of Henna leaves), and
173.15 mg/L and 141.11 mg/L (for the ethanol extract of Henna leaves). The
recommendation of this study was to continue investigation on natural products to
determine and add any products potential as mosquito larvicides
7
سمية المستخلص المائي والإيثانولي لرايزومات الجنزبيل وأوراق الحناء علي يرقات بعوض الأنوفلس والكيولكس أحمد آدمأحمد الدخري
2015ماجستير العلوم في العلوم والتقنية البيولوجية )العلوم البيولوجية( أكتوبر مركز العلوم والتقنية البيولوجية
كلية الهندسة والتكنولوجيا جامعة الجزيرة
الملخص العربي
تستخدم المنتجات الطبيعية بصورة كبيرة في مجالات الصناعات الدوائية, مستحضرات التجميل
والغذائية, بينما بعض منها قد أظهر تأثيرات طاردة أو سامة ضد بعض الآفات الحشرية. ريزومات الجنزبيل
منازل السودانية. هدف هذا البحث لتحديد السمية )بدلالة التركيز وأوراق الحناء من المواد الشائعة الإستخدام في ال
(( للمستخلصات المائية والإيثانولية للجنزبيل وأوراق الحناء علي 95LC) %95( و 50LC) %50الكافي لقتل
الأطوار اليرقية لبعوض الأنوفلس والكيولكس. تم إحضار عينات رايزومات الزنجبيل من السوق المركزي, مدينة
مدينة ود مدني أيضاً. تم إحضار يرقات حنتوب شرقود مدني, بينما أحضرت أوراق الحناء )طازجة( من
البعوض من بيت الحشرات لمعهد النيل الأزرق, جامعة الجزيرة والتي إستخدمت مباشرة في إختبارات السمية. تم
هذه المركبات )السمية( علي يرقات إتباع الأساسيات الموصي بها من منظمة الصحة العالمية لإختبار فاعلية
و 50LCساعة. كررت كل تجربة ثلاثة مرات. أجريت حسابات 48و 24البعوض بعناية. كان زمن التعريض
95LC لكل من المستخلص المائي والإيثانولي لكل المستخلصات بإستخدام تحليل بروبيت الإحصائي. أظهرت
بعوض الأنوفلس تجاه كل المستخلصات )عدا المستخلص النتائج أن بعوض الكيولكس أكثر حساسية من
الإيثانولي للجنزبيل(. المستخلصات الإيثانولية أظهرت سمية أعلي نسبياً من المستخلصات المائية ضد يرقات
148ملغ/لتر و 199.33كانت 50LCالبعوض. علي التوالي, بالنسبة ليرقات الأنوفلس والكيولكس, قيم
ملغ/لتر )للمستخلص الإيثانولي 143.67ملغ/لتر و 171.73المائي للجنزبيل(, ملغ/لتر )للمستخلص
ملغ/لتر و 173.15ملغ/لتر )للمستخلص المائي لأوراق الحناء(, 538.77ملغ/لتر و 618.45للجنزبيل(,
تجات ملغ/لتر )للمستخلص الإيثانولي لأوراق الحناء(. توصي هذه الدراسة بمواصلة البحوث علي المن 141.11
ضافة أي منتجات لها القدرة علي قتل يرقات البعوض. الطبيعية لتحديد وا
8
Table of Contents
Subject Page
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Abstract v
Arabic Abstract vi
Table of Contents vii
List of Tables ix
List of Figure x
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 3
2.1 Mosquitoes: 3
2.1.1. Description and biology: 3
2.1.2. Identification: 4
2.1.3. Medical importance: 4
2.1.4. Larvae: 5
2.2. Ginger: Zingiber officinalis Roscoe 6
2.2.1 Morphology 6
2.2.2 Traditional uses 6
2.2.3 Chemistry 7
2.2.4 Nutritional importance 7
2.3. Henna Lawsonia inermis 8
2.3.1 Description 8
2.3.2 Cultivation 8
2.3.3 Uses as a medicine 9
2.3.4 Health effects 9
2.3.5 Chemical composition 9
CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS 11
3.1. The study Area: 11
3.2. Collection and maintenance of larvae 11
3.3 Plants samples: 11
9
3.3.1 Preparation of extracts: 12
3.4 Bioassay of the test: 12
3.5 Statistical analysis: 12
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 13
4.1. Effect of Z. officinal rhizome on Anopheles and Culex larvae 13
4.1.1 Aqueous extract 13
.4.1 2 Ethanol extract 15
4.2. Effect of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles and Culex larvae 17
.4 2. .1 Aqueous extract 17
.4 2.2. Ethanol extract 19
Chapter Five: Conclusions and Recommendations 23
5.1. Conclusions 23
5.2 Recommendations 23
References 24
10
List of Table and Figure
Table
No.
Title Page
4.1 Effect of aqueous extract of ginger Z. officinal rhizome on
Anopheles and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission
periods
14
4.2 Effect of ethanol extract of ginger Z. officinal rhizome on
Anopheles and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission
periods
16
4.3 Effect of aqueous extract of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles
and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
18
4.4 Effect of ethanol extract of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles
and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
20
4.1 22
11
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Mosquitoes are responsible for transmitting various infectious diseases;
hence, mosquito has been declared as ‘Public Enemy Number One’ (WHO, 1992).
Mosquitoes belonging to the genera Anopheles, Culex and Aedes are the vectors for
the pathogens of different diseases such as malaria, filariasis, Japanese encephalitis,
dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever, epidemic poly arthritis.
In recent years, mosquito control programs had a setback because of the ever-
increasing insecticide resistance (WHO,1992; Liu et al., 2005). Besides insecticidal
resistance in arthropod vectors, the increased cost of insecticides and increased public
concern over environmental contamination have demanded a continued search for
alternative vector control strategies which would be environmentally safer and
specific in their action (Coats, 1994; Khan and Selman, 1996; Peng et al., 1998).
Extracts from leaves, flowers and roots of plants and oils were found to have
mosquito larvicidal activity (Sharma et al., 1998; Sosan et al., 2001).
Insecticides and fungicides should reduce insect and disease problems; be
target-specific (kill the pest, but not other organisms); break down quickly; have low
mammalian toxicity; and have minimal impact on the environment. Although
synthetic products (e.g., pyrethroids and neonicotinoids) have long been an important
part of pest management, there are risks to using them. As a result of this, as well as
the increased interest in organic gardening, many people are seeking less hazardous
alternatives to conventional pesticides. Lists of products that are acceptable in organic
plant production can be found at the Organic Materials Review Institute (Moreau et
al., 2006)
Zingiber officinalis Roscoe, commonly known as ginger belongs to family
Zingiberaceae is cultivated commercially in India, China, South East Asia, West
Indies, Mexico and other parts of the world. It is consumed worldwide as a spice and
flavoring agent and is attributed to have many medicinal properties. The British
Herbal Compendium reported its action as carminative, anti-emetic, spasmolytic,
peripheral circulatory stimulant and anti- inflammatory (Bradley, 1992).
The principal colouring matter of henna is lawsone, 2-hydroxy-1:4
napthaquinone (C10H6O3) besides lawsone other constituents present are gallic acid,
12
glucose, mannitol, fats, resin (2 %), mucilage and traces of an alkaloid. Leaves yield
hennatannic acid and an olive oil green resin, soluble in ether and alcohol. Flowers
yield an essential oil (0.01-0.02 %) with brown or dark brown colour, strong fragrance
and consist mainly of α-and β-ionones; a nitrogenous compound and resin. Seeds
contain proteins (5.0%), carbohydrates (33.62 %), fibers (33.5 %), fatty oils (10-11
%) composed of behenic acid, arachidic acid, stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid
and linoleic acid. The unsaponified matter contains waxes and coloring matter. The
root contains a red coloring matter (Chaudhary et al., 2010).
Objectives:
To test the toxicity of the aqueous and ethanol extracts of Ginger (Zingiber
officinale L.) rhizome and Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) leaves on mosquitoes (Anopheles
and Culex) larvae
.
13
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Mosquitoes:
Mosquitoes belong to the order Diptera, a group of insects that only have one
pair of wing, located on the mesothorax. The hind pair is reduced to small, drumstick-
like organs, the halters. Diptera can only take fluid food, sometimes in the form of
blood. All species go through a complete metamorphosis in the life cycle (Nicholas
and Cowan, 1993).
In the more primitive suborder Nematocera, only females take blood, while
both sexes take sugar, usually from the nectar of flowers. The sugar is necessary for
activity of daily life, while the protein of blood is utilized for egg production (White,
1991).
2.1.1. Description and biology:
Approximately 3200 species of mosquitoes occur worldwide, and classified
into three subfamilies within the family culicidae. Most species of medical importance
are within the subfamily anophelinae (of which the most important genus is
Anopheles), and culicinae (Aedes, Culex and Mansonia) (Nicholas and Cowan, 1993).
Mosquitoes are small insects (about 3-6 mm long) with long legs, a globular
head, laterally compressed thorax and long cylindrical abdomen. The wings are rather
long and narrow and are carried flat over the back in repose. The mouth parts are used
for piercing and sucking. The piercing elements are more or less vestigial in the
males. The antennae are somewhat hairy in the female and bushy in the male. Each
blood meal generally provides enough nutrition for the female mosquito to produce a
batch of eggs, (30-150 in number); female anopheline needs at least two blood meals
before the first batch of eggs can be laid.
Male and female well live for several weeks, feeding repeatedly under natural
conditions. Breeding places of mosquitoes are always in water. Eggs may be
deposited on damp soil or vegetation, in moist tree-holes and sometimes directly on
the water. Larval development takes place about a week for most tropical mosquitoes,
but many temperate species over winter as larvae (White, 1991).
14
2.1.2. Identification:
Most medically important species of mosquitoes have close similarities to
other species which do not bite man. Specific identification may depend on minute
features of the male, the larvae or even the egg, often making it unreliable to identify
individual female specimens. For some species of mosquitoes it may be necessary to
look at their chromosomal characteristics protein or behavior, in order to distinguish
between species which are morphologically identical, or nearly so. The significance
of species complex is that some of the species are pests and vectors of disease, while
others are not (White, 1991).
The genus Anopheles includes over 400 species. A. gambiae Giles complex
are among the major vectors of malaria and filarial in Africa (White, 1974). The
relative significance of the six members of the complex in malaria transmission varies
considerable both with species and location (Colluzzi et al., 1979).
2.1.3. Medical importance:
Mosquitoes may serve as vectors of enzootic (i.e. restricted to animals or
birds) and some zoonotic diseases due to pathogens transmitted from animals to man,
e.g. yellow fever and subperiodic Burgian filariasis (White, 1989).
More than 400 viruses have been isolated and characterized as being arthropod
borne virus. They are all zoonotic, and almost 100 arboviruses have been recorded as
causing clinical symptoms in man, most are transmitted by vector mosquito or ticks
(Varma, 1989).
When Female mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles feed on the blood of an
infected person, any malarial parasites in the blood so taken being a new stage in their
life cycle within the mosquito. If the mosquito now bites a healthy person, the
parasites enter to his blood, destroying large numbers of red blood cells and producing
malaria (Jean, 1982).
Malaria is still the most important cause of fever and morbidity in the tropical
world. It is estimated that over 80% of the world clinical cases of malaria (250-450
million cases annually) and a very high proportion of the world's 1-2 million death
annually from malaria occur in tropical Africa (WHO, 1993). The measures used for
malaria control include these against the parasite through the widespread use of
antimalarial drugs for chemotherapy and chemosuppression and these against the
vectors. It is technically feasible to develop vaccines to protect humans from the
15
several encephalitis viruses, since the basic infection cycles will continue, however,
each new generation will require immunization (Reeves and Hardy, 1985).
2.1.4. Larvae:
The immature stages are always associated with free water, which may occur
in a wide range of locations. The mosquito egg hatches into a minute, worm-like larva
which feeds on microorganisms in water or on the water surface using paired mouth
brushes on the head. Vision is rudimentary but larva reacts rapidly to changes in light
intensity, moving actively with a wriggling or darting motion through water.
The bulky, thoracic part of the larva often has long bristles or hairs, which
assist in achieving balance. The abdomen has ten segments; the tenth segment is at an
angle to the ventral surface and has anal papillae. On the dorsal surface of the ninth
segment are the paired spiracles, sometime on the end of an extended siphon, through
which the larva obtains oxygen from the air/water interface. The larva passes through
four stages or instars molting to the pupal stage (Nicholas and Cowan, 1993).
Larvae will emerge from eggs within 2-3 days when environmental conditions
are ideal. All mosquito larvae go through four developmental stages called instars.
The first instars are barely noticeable to human eye. Last larval instars of some
species can be approximately 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) long. Larvae move through the
water in a serpentine motion when they sense a shadow or movement in their habitat,
larvae will quickly dive to the bottom to avoid the source of disturbance. Larvae are
well formed and lack legs. Upon careful inspection one can distinguish the wider
thorax from the long and slender abdomen. A tube-like structure, called a siphon, is
located at the tip of the abdomen. Larvae use the siphon to breathe air from water
surface. Larvae possessing a siphon (Culicine) hold their body roughly at a 45 degree
angle from the surface. Species of mosquitoes lacking a respiratory siphon
(Anopheline) hold their body horizontal to the water surface. They obtain air through
opening located on the dorsal surface of the abdomen. A few species will bore their
siphon into stems of aquatic plants to obtain oxygen.
Mosquito larvae can be found in a wide variety of habitats, including
temporary floodwater and snowmelt pools; more permanent water habitats like
marshes, swamps, lagoons, and ponds; stagnant waters; and natural and artificial
containers. Shallow water is ideal for larval survival because there is less turbulence
and wave action.
16
Upper water movement interferes with the surface feeding of some mosquito
species, and in most species, it hinders the larvae and pupae from obtaining oxygen at
the air-water interface. A deep-water environment presents bottom-feeding water
from reaching food that has accumulated at the lower levels of the water column.
Water quality in larval habitats can vary from fresh to saline to high in organic wastes.
Different species can tolerate and thrive in water with varying degrees of organic
contents.
Mosquito larvae eat a variety of living organisms, including detritus, algae,
bacteria, and fungi. Some mosquito species are predaceous and feed on other
mosquito larvae and small invertebrates. Depending on water temperature, crowding
and food availability, the larval stage is typically completed in 5-6 days (Renee and
Lourd, 2008).
2.2. Ginger: Zingiber officinalis Roscoe
2.2.1 Morphology
The ginger plant is an erect perennial growing from one to three feet in height. The
stem is surrounded by the sheathing bases of the two-ranked leaves. A club-like spike
of yellowish, purple-lipped flowers have show greenish yellow bracts beneath.
Unfortunately, ginger rarely flowers in cultivation. The ginger of commerce consists
of the thick scaly rhizomes (underground stems) of the plant. They branch with thick
thumb-like protrusions, thus individual divisions of the rhizome are known as "hands"
(Awang, 1992; Bisset and Wichtl, 1994). Rhizomes are 7-15 cm long and 1-1.5 cm
broad and laterally compressed. The branches arise obliquely from the rhizome are
about 1-3 cm long and terminate in depress scars or in undeveloped buds. The outer
surface is buff colored and longitudinally striated or fibrous (Evans, 2002). Fractured
surface shows a narrow cortex, a well marked endodermis and a wide stele (Ali,
1998).
2.2.2 Traditional uses
Ginger is extensively used around the world in foods as a spice. For centuries,
it has been an important ingredient in Chinese, Ayurvedic and Tibb-Unani herbal
medicines. In India the fresh and dried roots were measured distinct medicinal
products. Fresh ginger has been used for cold-induced disease, nausea, asthma, cough,
colic, heart palpitation, swellings, dyspepsia, loss of appetite, and rheumatism. In
short, it is used for the same purposes as in ancient China. In nineteenth century India,
17
one English writer observed that a popular preparation for cough and asthma
consisted of the juice of fresh ginger with a little juice of fresh garlic, mixed with
honey. A glue of powdered dried ginger was applied to the temples to mitigate
headache. To dispel nausea, fresh ginger was mixed with a little honey, topped off
with a nip of burnt peacock feathers. One modern government health guide in India
suggests 1-2 teaspoons of ginger juice with honey as a cough suppressant. Ginger is
as popular a home remedy in India today, as it was 2,000 years ago (Awang, 1992;
Bisset and Wichtl, 1994). The rhizomes of ginger are used as spice in food and
beverages and in traditional medicine as carminative, antipyrexia and treatment of
waist pain rheumatism and bronchitis. It is used for the treatment of gastrointestinal
disorders and piles (Banerjee, et al., 2011).
2.2.3 Chemistry
The pungency of ginger is due to gingerol, an oily liquid consisting of
homologous phenols. It is formed in the plant from phenylalanine, malonate and
hexonate (Evans, 2002). In the fresh ginger rhizome, the gingerols were identified as
the major active components and gingerol [5-hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy
phenyl) decan-3-one] is the most abundant constituent in the gingerol series. The
powdered rhizome contains 3-6% fatty oil, 9% protein, 60-70% carbohydrates, 3-8%
crude fiber, about 8% ash, 9-12% water and 2-3% volatile oil. The volatile oil consists
of mainly mono and sesquiterpenes; camphene, betaphellandrene, curcumene, cineole,
geranyl (Yoganarasimhan, 1996).
2.2.4 Nutritional importance
Fresh ginger contains 80.9% moisture, 2.3% protein, 0.9% fat, 1.2% minerals,
2.4% fiber and 12.3% Carbohydrates. The minerals present in ginger are iron, calcium
and phosphorous. It also contains vitamins such as thiamine, riboflavin, niacin and
vitamin C. The composition varies with the type, variety, agronomic conditions,
curing methods, drying and storage conditions (Govindarajan, 1982). Ginger
(Zingiber officinale) has been used as a spice for over 2000 years. Its roots and the
obtained extracts contain polyphenol compounds (gingerol and its derivatives), which
have a high antioxidant activity. Although the digestion stimulating effect of this
spice became known a long time ago, the stimulating effect on peptic juices, such as
gastric juice, bile, pancreatic and intestinal juices, was discovered later. Bile acids
play a major role in the uptake of fats and each upset in the metabolism of fats would
18
impede food digestion as a whole, because the fatty particles cover the other food
elements and make them inaccessible for the action of the digestive enzymes. Lipase
is the other key factor which plays a vital role in fat digestion. When ginger was
included in animal diets, it was found that there was a considerable increase in the
pancreatic and intestine lipase (Platel and Srinivasan, 2000).
2.3. Henna Lawsonia inermis
Also known as hina, the henna tree, the mignonette tree, and the Egyptian
privet is a flowering plant and the sole species of the Lawsonia genus (Bailey and
Bailey, 1976). The name henna also refers to the dye prepared from the plant and the
art of temporary based on those dyes. Henna has been used since antiquity to dye
skin, hair and fingernails, as well as fabrics including silk, wool and leather. The
name is used in other skin and hair dyes, such as black henna and neutral henna,
neither of which is derived from the henna plant (Dennis, 2013)
2.3.1 Description
Henna is a tall shrub or small tree, standing 1.8 to 7.6 m tall (6 to 25 ft). It
is multi-branched, with spine-tipped branchlets. The leaves grow opposite each other
on the stem. They are long and wider in the middle; average dimensions are 1.5–
5.0 cm x 0.5–2 cm or 0.6–2 in x 0.2–0.8 in (Bailey and Bailey, 1976). Henna flowers
have four sepals and a 2 mm (0.079 in) calyx tube, with 3 mm (0.12 in) spread lobes.
Its petals are obvate, with white or red stamens found in pairs on the rim of the calyx
tube. The ovary is four-celled, 5 mm (0.20 in) long, and erect. Henna fruits are small,
brownish capsules, 4–8 mm (0.16–0.31 in) in diameter, with 32–49 seeds per fruit,
and open irregularly into four splits (Kumar et al., 2005).
2.3.2 Cultivation
The henna plant is native to northern Africa, western and southern Asia, and
northern Australasia, in semi-arid zones and tropical areas (Dennis, 2013). It produces
the most dye when grown in temperatures between 35 and 45 °C (95 and 113 °F)
(Bechtold, 2009). During the onset of precipitation intervals, the plant grows rapidly,
putting out new shoots. Growth subsequently slows. The leaves gradually yellow and
fall during prolonged dry or cool intervals. It does not thrive where minimum
temperatures are below 11 °C (52 °F). Temperatures below 5 °C (41 °F) will kill the
henna plant.
19
2.3.3 Uses as a medicine
Henna is known as a traditional medicine. It shows various health benefits such
as hypoglycaemic and hypolipidemic activities, inhibits the tuberculosis bacteria, and
useful in skin diseases. Moreover, henna extract prevents the liver damage occurred
from exposure of carbon tetrachloride (Kang and Lee, 2006). According to Ayurveda
for All by Murli Manohar, boiled aqueous extract of henna is effective remedy for the
urinary stones (Manohar, 2011).
2.3.4 Health effects
Henna is known to be dangerous to people with glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase deficiency which is more common in males than females. Infants and
children of particular ethnic groups are especially vulnerable (Bechtold, 2009).
Though user accounts cite few other negative effects of natural henna paste, save for
occasional allergic reactions, pre-mixed henna body art pastes may have ingredients
added to darken stain, or to alter stain color. The health risks involved in pre-mixed
paste can be significant. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
does consider these risks to be adulterants and therefore illegal for use on skin
(Manohar, 2011). Some pastes have been noted to include: silver nitrate, carmine,
pyrogallol, disperse orange dye, and chromium (Kang and Lee, 2006). These have
been found to cause allergic reactions, chronic inflammatory reactions or late-onset
allergic reactions to hair-dressing products and textile dyes (Dron et al., 2007).
2.3.5 Chemical composition
The plant is reported to contain carbohydrates, proteins, flavonoids, tannins
and phenolic compounds, alkaloids, terpenoids, quinones, coumarins, xanthones and
fatty acids. The plant has been reported to have analgesic, hypoglycemic,
hepatoprotective, immunostimulant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antimicrobial,
antifungal, antiviral, antiparasitic, antitrypanosomal, antidermatophytic, antioxidant,
antifertility, tuberculostatic and anticancer properties. It is now considered as a
valuable source of unique natural products for development of medicines against
various diseases and also for the development of industrial products. The principal
colouring matter of henna is lawsone, 2-hydroxy-1:4 napthaquinone (C10H6O3)
besides lawsone other constituents present are gallic acid, glucose, mannitol, fats,
resin (2 %), mucilage and traces of an alkaloid. Leaves yield hennatannic acid and an
olive oil green resin, soluble in ether and alcohol. Flowers yield an essential oil (0.01-
20
0.02 %) with brown or dark brown colour, strong fragrance and consist mainly of α-
and β- ionones; a nitrogenous compound and resin. Seeds contain proteins (5.0%),
carbohydrates (33.62 %), fibers (33.5 %), fatty oils (10-11 %) composed of behenic
acid, arachidic acid, stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid. The
unsaponified matter contains waxes and coloring matter. The root contains a red
colouring matter (Chaudhary et al., 2010).
21
CHAPTER THREE
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1. The study Area:
Wad Medani is located in the central part of Gezira state, Sudan and hence it
the mean status of habitat and susceptibilities of mosquitoes in the Gezira. Different
localities within Wad Medani city were selected for sampling mosquito larvae. A few
bushes and grasses were noticed to be scattered in these areas and no other
distinguishing features were observed.
3.2. Collection and maintenance of larvae:
A white enameled dipper was preferred, because this allows to see the larvae
most easily. According to WHO (1992) the dipper was used as follows:-
1. The dipper was lowered gently into the water at an angle of about 45o until
one side is just below the surface.
2. Care was taken during dipping, not to disturb the larvae and thus cause
them to swim down wards.
3. The dipper was moved along the breeding site, skimming the surface of the
water.
4. The dipper was left out of the water, so as not to spill the water containing
the larvae.
Mosquito’s larvae, pupae and other aquatic organisms were collected during
dipping and were put in large plastic container. Then larvae of each species
(Anopheles and Culex) were separated and transferred to the beakers of the toxicity
tests by means of a plastic dropper.
3.3 Plants samples:
The samples of Ginger (Zingiber officinal) rhizome was brought (dry) from
Wad Medani local market, Gezira State, whereas Henna (Lawsonia inermis) leaves
were collected (fresh) from Hantoub east of Wad Medani City at early morning and
the collected samples were immediately cleaned manually, dried in shade under room
temperature away from the direct sunlight. After being dried, the plant samples
(ginger rhizome and henna leaves) were grounded and kept in plastic containers for
the further steps.
22
3.3.1 Preparation of extracts:
Each dried sample was grounded to fine powder by using an electrical blender.
1.0 g of each powder was soaked into 10 ml of distilled water or ethanol in 10 ml
conical flasks for 24 hours and then filtered by using a filter paper. The dry weight of
the non-dissolved powder (filtrate) of each plant product into each solvent were
measured as same as the volume of each resulted extract, so as to calculate the
original concentrations (stock concentrations) in term of w/v (mg/ml).
3.4 Bioassay of the test:
In series (normally, 5 concentrations x 3 replicates for each extract) of beaker
(each of 250 ml volume), each of which was filled with a total volume of 250 ml tap
water, provided with 20 Anopheles or Culex larvae (of the third or early forth instars),
and applied with volumes of 0.5, 0.75, 1.00, 1.50 and 2.00 ml from the stock
concentration of each extract, in addition to one beaker as control, the toxicity tests
were run, following the instructions of WHO (1981). The submission periods were 24
and 48 hours. The signs of death to record the mortality data follow Busvine (1971).
3.5 Statistical analysis:
The concentrations used were transformed to the corresponding logarithms,
whereas, the mean (of three replicates) corrected mortalities were transformed to
probit (Finney, 1936). Simple regression analysis was run for log’s (X variable) and
probits (Y variable) so as to obtain the intercept (a) and the regression coefficient (b;
the slope), in addition to R2; the homogeneity factor. By using the regression equation
(Y = a + bX), the lethal concentrations; LC50 and LC95 (in mg/L) were calculated by
substituting Y (in each regression equation) by 5 and 6.64, respectively, according to
Abbott (1925). The least the LC value, the best will be the extract.
23
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Effect of Z. officinal rhizome on Anopheles and Culex larvae
4.1.1 Aqueous extract
The stock concentration of the aqueous extract of ginger rhizome was 200
mg/5 ml solvent (40 mg/L for each 1 ml). Volumes of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 ml from
this stock concentration were added separately to 250 ml water and the resulted tested
concentrations were 80, 120, 160, 240 and 320 mg/L. Table (4.1) showed that, the
corresponding corrected mortalities were 8, 18, 30,63 and 80%, respectively, in
Anopheles larvae, and 13, 15, 38, 83 and 93%, following the same order in Culex
larvae, just after 24 hours, with LC50 and LC95 of 199.53 and 547.14 mg/L,
respectively, for Anopheles larvae and 164.48 and 366.07 mg/L, followed the same
order for Culex larvae.
After 48 hours, the resulted mortalities did not differed than that resulted after
24 hours by more than 13% in most cases in Anopheles larvae, and by 8% in most
cases in Culex larvae. The R2 ranged between 0.93 and 0.99 in Anopheles and Culex
larvae during the two test periods, and seemed to reflect great homogeneity between
concentrations used and the corresponding mortalities.
The LC50’s values revealed that, Culex larvae (LC50 = 164.48 mg/L) were
more susceptible to ginger rhizome aqueous extract than Anopheles larvae (LC50 =
199.53 mg/L), i.e. the aqueous extract of ginger rhizome was relatively more toxic to
Culex larvae than Anopheles larvae.
Isman (2000), reported that Bio-efficacy of the essential oils of Mentha piperita,
Z. officinalis, Emblica officinalis, and Curcuma longa were evaluated for their
larvicidal activity against Spodoptera litoralis, M. domestica, Leptinotarsa
decemlineata, and Bovicola ocellatus. Essential oil of some plants including and Z.
officinale produced significant larval mortality against two mosquito species.
However, the highest larvicidal activity was observed in the essential oil from Z.
officinale against Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and An. subpictus (Marimuthu, 2011).
Rhizomes are externally effective as insect repellent against houseflies (Asolkar et
al., 1992).
24
Table (4.1) Effect of aqueous extract of ginger Z. officinal rhizome on Anopheles
and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
48 hours 24 hours
Concentration Transformed
Probit value
Mortality Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Log mg/L
4.08 4.16 18 20 3.87 3.59 13 8 1.90 80
4.26 4.69 23 38 3.96 4.08 15 18 2.08 120
5.25 4.75 60 40 4.69 4.48 38 30 2.20 160
5.95 5.67 83 75 5.95 5.33 83 63 2.38 240
7.05 6.48 98 93 6.48 5.84 93 80 2.51 320
Regression analysis
-5.65 -3.04 -5.46 -3.71 Intercept
4.95 3.70 4.72 3.78 Slope
0.94 0.94 0.93 0.99 R2
141.75 148.00 164.48 199.53 LC50
303.97 413.25 366.07 547.14 LC95
25
Products isolated/derived from Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Z. officinale (ginger)
have also been found effective as insect antifeedant and insect growth regulators
(Agarwal and Walia, 2003).
The active toxic material in ginger are arylalcanones such as gingerols and
gingerol analogues (Jiang et al., 2005) and most activities of ginger were attributed to
gingerol (Ahui et al., 2008). Rhizome of ginger contains tannins and flavonoids, some
of which have been identified as kaempferide, galangin and alpinin (Sastry, 1961)
.4.1 2 Ethanol extract
The stock concentration of the ethanol extract of ginger rhizome was 190 mg/
4 ml solvent (47.5 mg/L for each 1 ml). Volumes of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 ml from
this stock concentration were added separately to 250 ml water and the resulted tested
concentrations were 95, 143, 190, 285 and 360 mg/L as was showed in Table (4.2). So
the same table showed, the corresponding corrected mortalities were 15, 30, 43, 85
and 98%, respectively, in Anopheles larvae, and 8, 13, 67, 90 and 100%, following
the same order in Culex larvae, just after 24 hours, with LC50 and LC95 of 171.73 and
351.12 mg/L, respectively, for Anopheles larvae and 178.49 and 329.5 mg/L,
followed the same order for Culex larvae.
After 48 hours, the resulted mortalities did not differed than that resulted after
24 hours by more than 28% in most cases in Anopheles larvae, and by 18% in most
cases in Culex larvae. The R2 ranged between 0.94 and 0.91 in Anopheles and Culex
larvae during the two test periods, and seemed to reflect great homogeneity between
concentrations used and the corresponding mortalities.
The LC50’s values revealed that, Culex larvae (LC50 = 178.49mg/L) were less
susceptible to ginger rhizome ethanol extract than Anopheles larvae (LC50 = 171.73
mg/L), i.e. the ethanol extract of ginger rhizome was relatively less toxic to Culex
larvae than Anopheles larvae.
26
Table (4.2) Effect of ethanol extract of ginger Z. officinal rhizome on Anopheles
and Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
48 hours 24 hours
Concentration Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Log mg/L
4.08 4.42 18 28 3.59 3.96 8 15 1.98 95
4.33 4.95 25 48 3.87 4.48 13 30 2.16 143
5.84 5.13 80 55 5.44 4.82 67 43 2.28 190
7.05 6.64 98 95 6.28 6.04 90 85 2.45 285
- - 100 100 - 7.05 100 98 2.56 360
Regression analysis
-9.49 -4.70 -8.87 -6.80 Intercept
6.68 4.50 6.16 5.28 Slope
0.91 0.88 0.91 0.94 R2
147.63 143.67 178.49 171.73 LC50
259.82 331.13 1000 351.12 LC95
27
4.2. Effect of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles and Culex larvae
.4 2. .1 Aqueous extract
The stock concentration of the aqueous extract of Henna leaves was 200 mg/2
ml solvent (100 mg/L for each 1 ml). Volumes of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 ml from this
stock concentration were added separately to 250 ml water and the resulted tested
concentrations were 200, 300, 400, 600 and 800 mg/L. (Table, 4.3) showed that, the
corresponding corrected mortalities were 15, 23, 28, 45 and 65%, respectively, in
Anopheles larvae, and 15, 15, 40, 73 and 93%, following the same order in Culex
larvae, just after 24 hours, with LC50 and LC95 of 618.45 and 3194.1 mg/L,
respectively, for Anopheles larvae and 423.08 and 1000 mg/L, followed the same
order for Culex larvae.
After 48 hours, the resulted mortalities did not differed than that resulted after
24 hours by more than 18% in most cases in Anopheles larvae, and by 18% in most
cases in Culex larvae. The R2 ranged between 0.95 and 0.91 in Anopheles and Culex
larvae during the two test periods, and seemed to reflect great homogeneity between
concentrations used and the corresponding mortalities.
The LC50’s values revealed that, Anopheles larvae (LC50 = 618.45mg/L) were
less susceptible to ginger rhizome aqueous extract than Culex larvae (LC50 = 423.08
mg/L), i.e. the aqueous extract of henna leaves was relatively less toxic to Anopheles
larvae than Culex larvae.
Bakhshi, (2014) recorded that the highest toxic effect of L. inermis was found at
4000 ppm and the lowest at 4 ppm against larval stages -1 and -2 of Anopheles
stephensi. Govindarajan and Sivakumar (2011), reported that tannin and tannic acid of
L. inermis cause the damage on epithelial membrane of gut of mosquito larvae. So
this compound is responsible for mortality of mosquito larvae. In fact, extract of L.
inermis is comprised of tannin and tannic acid and agent to damage the epithelial
membrane and suppress the immunity system of mosquito larvae.
28
Table (4.3) Effect of aqueous extract of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles and
Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
48 hours 24 hours
Concentration Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Log mg/L
4.08 4.08 18 18 3.96 3.96 15 15 2.30 200
4.16 4.33 20 25 3.96 4.26 15 23 2.48 300
5.18 4.61 57 35 4.75 4.42 40 28 2.60 400
5.77 4.95 78 48 5.61 4.87 73 45 2.78 600
7.05 5.61 98 73 6.48 5.39 93 65 2.90 800
Regression analysis
-7.64 -1.61 -6.53 -1.42 Intercept
4.93 2.42 4.39 2.30 Slope
0.91 0.93 0.91 0.95 R2
584.43 538.77 423.08 618.45 LC50
788.05 2565.62 1000 3194.1 LC95
29
.4 2.2. Ethanol extract
The stock concentration of the ethanol extract of Henna leaves was 200 mg/5
ml solvent (40 mg/L for each 1 ml). Volumes of 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2 ml from this
stock concentration were added separately to 250 ml water and the resulted tested
concentrations were 80, 120, 160, 240 and 320 mg/L, as was showed in Table (4.4),
which showed that, the corresponding corrected mortalities were 18, 33, 35, 65 and
83%, respectively, in Anopheles larvae, and 23, 28, 38, 95 and 100%, following the
same order in Culex larvae, just after 24 hours, with LC50 and LC95 of 173.15 and
604.58 mg/L, respectively, for Anopheles larvae and 138.57 and 304.32 mg/L,
followed the same order for Culex larvae.
After 48 hours, the resulted mortalities did not differed than that resulted after
24 hours by more than 25% in most cases in Anopheles larvae, and by 48% in most
cases in Culex larvae. The R2 ranged between 0.95 and 0.77 in Anopheles and Culex
larvae during the two test periods, and seemed to reflect great homogeneity between
concentrations used and the corresponding mortalities.
The LC50’s values revealed that, Culex larvae (LC50 = 138.57 mg/L) were
more susceptible to ginger rhizome aqueous extract than Anopheles larvae (LC50 =
173.15 mg/L), i.e. the aqueous extract of henna leaves was relatively more toxic to
Culex larvae than Anopheles larvae.
30
Table (4.4) Effect of ethanol extract of Henna L. inermis leaves on Anopheles and
Culex larvae after 24 and 48 hours submission periods
48 hours 24 hours
Concentration Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Transformed
Probit value
Mortality
Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Culex An. Log mg/L
4.95 4.33 48 25 4.26 4.08 23 18 1.90 80
5.13 4.69 55 38 4.42 4.56 28 33 2.08 120
5.25 5.00 60 50 4.69 4.61 38 35 2.20 160
7.05 5.61 98 73 6.64 5.39 95 65 2.38 240
- 6.48 100 93 - 5.95 100 83 2.51 320
Regression analysis
-3.34 -2.33 -5.28 -1.76 Intercept
4.18 3.41 4.80 3.02 Slope
0.74 0.94 0.77 0.95 R2
98.90 141.11 138.57 173.15 LC50
244.10 427.07 304.32 604.58 LC95
31
48 h-Cu 24 h-Cu 48 h-An 24h-An Product
141.75 164.48 148.00 199.53 Aq-z
147.63 178.49 143.67 171.73 Eth-z
584.43 423.08 538.77 618.45 Aq-hen
98.90 138.57 141.11 173.15 Eth-hen
32
33
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. Conclusions
1- The aqueous extract of ginger rhizome was relatively more toxic to Culex larvae
than Anopheles larvae.
2- The ethanol extract of ginger rhizome was relatively more toxic to Culex larvae
than Anopheles larvae.
3- The aqueous extract of henna leaves was relatively more toxic to Culex larvae than
Anopheles larvae.
4- The ethanol extract of ginger rhizome was relatively more toxic to Culex larvae
than Anopheles larvae.
5.2 Recommendations
1- To continue investigation on natural products to determine and add any products
potential as mosquito larvicides.
2- Other plant products should also be tested against mosquito larvae.
3- The tested plant extract can be used as an alternative larvicidal compound for
the IPM programs.
34
References
Abbott, W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticides. J.
Entomol., 18: 265-267.
Adamski, Z.; Niewadzi, M. and Ziemnicki, K. (2005). Inheritance of chorionic
malformations and insecticide resistance by Spodoptera exigua. J. Appl.
Entomol., 129: 526-533.
Agarwal, M. and Walia, S. (2003). Pest control potential of phytochemicals derived
from Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale. In P. Dureja, D.B. Saxena, J.
Kumar, S.B. Singh, M. Gopal and R.S. Tanwar (eds.), Proc. Int. Conf.
Pesticides, Environment, Food Security, Society of Pesticide Science, New
Delhi, pp 110–119.
Ahui, M. L. B.; Champy, P.; Ramadan, A.; Pham, V. L.; Araujo, L.; Konan, B.
A.; Diem, S.; Damotte, D.; Kati-Coulibaly, S.; Offoumou, A. M.;
Thieblemont, N. and Herbelin, A. (2008). Ginger prevents Th2-mediated
immune responses in a mouse model of airway inflammation. Int.
Immunopharmacol., 8(12): 1626-1632.
Ali M. (1998). Text book of Pharmacognosy, 2nd Edn, CBS publishers and
Distributors: 258-262.
Asolkar, L. V., Kakkar, K. K. and Chakre, O. J. (1992). Second Supplement to
Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants with Active Principles Part I (A-K). (1965-
81). Publications and Informations Directorate (CSIR), New Delhi. 414p.
Awang, D. V. C. (1992). Ginger. Can. Pharm. J., 309,
Bailey, L. H. and Bailey, E. Z. (1976). Hortus Third: A concise dictionary of plants
cultivated in the United States and Canada. New York:
Macmillan. ISBN 978-0025054707.
Bakhshi, H. (2014). Larvicidal Properties of Botanical Extracts of Lawsonia inermis
against Anopheles stephensi. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 4: 178-185.
Banerjee, S.; Mullick, H. I. and Banerjee, J. (2011). Zingiber Officinale: A Natural
Gold, International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, Vol (2) 0975-6299.
Bechtold, T. and Mussak, R. (2009). Handbook of Natural Colorants. John Wiley
and Sons. p. 155. ISBN 9780470744963.
35
Bisset, N. G. and Wichtl, M, (1994). Herbal Drugs and Phytopharmaceuticals, Med.
Pharm. Scientific Publishers.
Bradley, P. R. (1992). British Herbal compendium. Bournemouthe, Vol 1, 190,
Busvine, J. R. (1971). A critical Review of the techniques for testing insecticides. 2nd
edn. 345pp.
Chaudhary, G.; Sandeep, G. and Priyanka, P. (2010). Lawsonia inermis Linnaeus:
A Phytopharmacological Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical
Sciences and Drug Research, 2(2): 91-98.
Coats, J. R. (1994). Risks from natural versus synthetic insecticides. Ann Rev Ent.,
39: 489–515.
Colluzzi, M.; Submarine A.; Peterarca, V.; and Dideco, M. A. (1979).
Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the An.
gambia complex. J. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.,73: 483-497.
Dennis, B. (2013). "FDA: Beware of "black henna" tattoos". The Style Blog. The
Washington Post. Retrieved 5 May 2013.
Dron, P.; Lafourcade, M. P. and Leprince, F. (2007). "Allergies associated with
body piercing and tattoos: a report of the Allergy Vigilance
Network". European Annals of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 39 (6): 189–
92..
Evans, W. C. (2002). Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy, 16th edn, Saunders
Elsevier: 289-292,
Finney, D. E. (1936). Probit analysis. 2nd edn., 318 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Press.
Govindarajan, M. and Sivakumar, R. (2011). Mosquito Adulticidal and Repellent
Activities of Botanical Extracts against Malarial Vector, Anopheles stephensi
Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 4:
941-947.
Govindarajan, V. S. (1982). Ginger: Chemistry, technology and quality evaluation.
Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 17(1):
Isman, M. B. (2000). Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop
Prot., 19: 603-60
Jean, M. (1982). Success in Biology. Richard cloy (the Chaucer press), Ltd. Printed
in Hong Kong. 355- 357 pp.
Jiang, H.; Solyom, A. M.; Timmermann, B. N. and Gang, D. R. (2005).
36
Characterization of gingerol related compounds in ginger rhizome (Zingiber
officinale Rosc.) by high performance liquid chromatography/electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectr., 19 (20). 2957-
2964.
Kang, I. J. and Lee, M. H. (2006). "Quantification of para-phenylenediamine and
heavy metals in henna dye". Contact Dermatitis, 55 (1):26–9.
Khan, A. R. and Selman, B. J. (1996). Microsporidian pathogens of mosquitoes and
their potential of control agents. Agri. Zool. Rev., 7: 303–335.
Kumar, S.; Singh, Y. V. and Singh, M. (2005). "Agro-History, Uses, Ecology and
Distribution of Henna (Lawsonia inermis L. syn. Alba Lam)". Henna:
Cultivation, Improvement, and Trade. Jodhpur: Central Arid Zone Research
Institute. pp. 11–12. OCLC 124036118.
Liu, H.; Xu, Q,; Zhang, L. and Liu, N. (2005). Chlorpyrifos resistance mosquito
Culex quinquefasciatus. J. Med. Entomol., 42: 815–820.
Manohar, M. (2011). Ayurveda for All. India: V and S Publishers. P. 138. ISBN
9381384908.
Marimuthu, G. (2011). Larvicidal and repellent properties of some essential oils
against Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles and Anopheles subpictus Grassi
(Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 106-111.
Moreau, T. L.; Warman, P. R. and Hoyle, J. (2006). An evaluation of companion
planting and botanical extracts as alternative pest controls for the colorado
potato beetle. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 23: 351-370.
Nicholas, R. H. B. and Cowan, G. O. (1993). A color Atlas of Medical Entomology.
Chapman and Hall medical. 10-80 pp.
Peng, Y.; Song, J.; Tian, G.; Xue, Q.; Ge, F.; Yang, J. and Shi, Q. (1998). Field
evaluation of Romanomermis yunanensis (Nematoda: Mermithidae) for
control of culicinae mosquitoes in China. Fundam Appl. Nematol., 21: 227–
232.
Platel, K. and Srinivasan, K. (2000). Influence of dietary spices and their active
principles on pancreatic digestive enzymes in albino rats. Nahrung, 1: 42–46.
Reeves, W. C. and Hardy, J. L. (1985). Mosquito borne encephalitis and control in
the twenty-first century. J. Mos. Cont. Res., 20.
Renee, R. A. and Lourd, C. H. (2008). Mosquito biology for the Homeowner. www.
37
entomology.comell.edu/med/En/mosquito.Fs.html48k.
Sastry, M. S. (1961). Comparitive chemical study of two varieties of galangal. Indian
J. Pharm., 23:76.
Sharma, N. N.; Qadry, J. S.; Subramanium, B.; Verghese, T.; Rahman, S. J.;
Sharma, S. and Jalees, S. (1998). Larvicidal activity of Gliricidia sepium
against mosquito larvae of Anopheles stephensi, Aedes aegypti and Culex
quinquefasciatus. Pharm Biol., 36: 3 – 7.
Sosan, M. B.; Adewoyin, F. B. and Adewunmi, C. O. (2001). Larvicidal properties
of three indigenous plant oils on the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Nig. J. Nat.
Prod. Med., 5: 30 – 33.
Varma, M. G. R. (1989). Arboviruses. WHO/VBC/89.967: 40.
White, G. B. (1974). Anopheles gambiae complex and diseases transmission in
Africa. J. Tran, R. soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 68: 278-301.
White, G. B. (1989). Mosquito-borne virus diseases. WHO/VBC/89.967.2-23 pp.
White, G. B. (1991). Medical entomology: Mosquito: 1404-1434, In: Manson Bahr,
P. E .C and Bell, D. R. (ed). Manson's tropical Diseases, 19th edn. London.
WHO (1981). Instruction for determining susceptibility or resistance of mosquito
larvae to insecticides. WHO/VBC/81.807.
WHO (1992). Report of an informal consultation of the detection, isolation,
identification and ecology of biocontrol of disease vectors. Documents/
TDR/BCV/ IC–GE/87,3.
WHO (1993). A global strategy for malaria control, Geneva.
Yoganarasimhan, S. N. (1996). Medicinal Plants of India, Vol.1, Interline Publishing
Private Limited: 645,.