Upload
vuhanh
View
220
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Total Total Maximum Maximum Daily Load Daily Load for Dioxin for Dioxin
in the in the Houston Houston
Ship Ship ChannelChannel
University of HoustonUniversity of HoustonParsons Water&InfrastructureParsons Water&Infrastructure
PBS&JPBS&J
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
Task 1 Task 1 –– Develop a QAPPDevelop a QAPP
QAPP approved on 01/27/2004Amendment 1, approved on 07/01/2004, developed to add:
vertical profiles of dioxin at 2 locationshigh-resolution sediment samplingboundary concentrations for model
Amendment 2, approved on 08/19/2004, developed toadd one set of runoff samplesmodify dry/wet and add bulk deposition samplingadd air sampling by particle size
Annual update, submitted on 01/20/2005add flow measurements
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
Task 2 Task 2 –– Monitoring and data collectionMonitoring and data collection
Assess current levels and trends in the project area:17 in-channel locations for water (dissolved and particulate matter), sediment, fish, and crab twice11 tributary locations for fish and crab 1 timesediment cores from 6-8 locations to gather data on the historical deposition of dioxins and furans as well as accumulation rates2 locations for deep&shallow water sampling once15 locations for high-resolution sediment sampling once2 locations in upper watershed for water sampling once
Task 2 Task 2 –– Monitoring and data collection Monitoring and data collection –– contcont’’dd
Assess major sources:• Ambient water at confluences with main tributaries (11
locations, 2 times)• Ambient air, wet/dry/bulk deposition, and particle size at 1
location• Runoff sampling at 10 locations once
Sampling locationsSampling locations
Water, sediment, and tissue (main channel)
Water and tissue (tribs)
Vertical profile (water)
Water, sediment, and tissue (main channel)
Water and tissue (tribs)
Vertical profile (water)
Dioxin in water profilesDioxin in water profiles
Texas WQS:0.093 pg/L
Open symbols: spring 2004Closed symbols average WO4
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(pg/
L)
Main channel San Jacinto River Tributaries Side Bays
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Dioxin in sedimentDioxin in sediment--ococ profilesprofiles
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(ng/
kg-o
c)
Main channel San Jacinto River Side Bays Tributaries
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Open symbols: spring 2004Closed symbols average WO4
Dioxin in catfish profilesDioxin in catfish profiles
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(ng/
kg-w
et w
t)
Main channel San Jacinto River Tributaries Side Bays
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Open symbols: spring 2004Closed symbols average WO4
Texas TEQ health-based std: 0.47 ng/kg
Dioxin in crab profilesDioxin in crab profiles
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(ng/
kg-w
et w
t)
Main channel San Jacinto River Tributaries Side Bays
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Open symbols: spring 2004Closed symbols average WO4
Texas TEQ health-based std: 0.47 ng/kg
Seasonal trends in water samplesSeasonal trends in water samples
Summer-02Fall-02Spring-03Spring-04
Error bars correspond to the 95 % confidence intervals
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Aver
age C
once
ntra
tion
(pg/
L)
2378-TCDD TEQ
DissolvedDissolved
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Aver
age C
once
ntra
tion
(pg/
L) SuspendedSuspended
2378-TCDD TEQ
Seasonal trends in sedimentSeasonal trends in sediment--ococ samplessamples
Summer-02Fall-02Spring-03Spring-04
Error bars correspond to the 95 % confidence intervals
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Aver
age C
once
ntra
tion
(ng/
kg-o
c)
2378-TCDD TEQ
Seasonal trends in tissue samplesSeasonal trends in tissue samples
Summer-02Fall-02Spring-03Spring-04
Error bars correspond to the 95 % confidence intervals 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Aver
age C
once
ntra
tion
(ng/
kg-w
et w
t)
CrabsCrabs
2378-TCDD TEQ
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Aver
age C
once
ntra
tion
(ng/
kg-w
et w
t)
CatfishCatfish
2378-TCDD TEQ
Approach 1:Water concentration target, relying on hi-vol water sampling
Approach 2:Tissue-based WQS, using bioaccumulation factors to link water/sediment concentrations to tissue concentrations
Identifying WQ targetsIdentifying WQ targets
Approach 1:Use measures of central tendency of the Cb/Cw and Cb/Coc ratios
Approach 2:Calculate BAF and BSAF from average concentrations (EPA, 2003)
Calculating bioaccumulation factorsCalculating bioaccumulation factors
Cb=concentration in biota [pg/kg-wet wt]Cw=concentration in water [pg/L]Coc=organic-carbon normalized concentration [pg/kg-oc]
BAF = Cb / Cw BSAF = Cb / CsedOC
23782378--TCDD HSC siteTCDD HSC site--specific BAF (specific BAF (CCbb//CCww))
Resulting WQ targets for catfish:
App 1: 0.042 pg/L
App 2: 0.045 pg/L
Resulting WQ targets for catfishResulting WQ targets for catfish:
App 1: 0.042 pg/L
App 2: 0.045 pg/L
Resulting WQ targets for crab:
App 1: 0.059 pg/L
App 2: 0. 061 pg/L
Resulting WQ targets for crabResulting WQ targets for crab:
App 1: 0.059 pg/L
App 2: 0. 061 pg/L
Data from 4 events
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03
avg log BAF (5.17)log (avg catfish/avg dissolved) (5.05)
Conc
entra
tion
in C
atfis
h (n
g/kg
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1E-06 1E-05 1E-04 1E-03
avg log BAF (4.78)log (avg crab/avg dissolved) (4.73)
Dissolved concentration (ng/L)
Conc
entra
tion
in C
rabs
(ng/
kg)
23782378--TCDD HSC siteTCDD HSC site--specific BSAF (specific BSAF (CCbb//CsCsococ))
Resulting sediment targets from catfish:
App 1: 72 ng/kg-oc
App 2: 151 ng/kg-oc
Resulting sediment targets from Resulting sediment targets from catfishcatfish:
App 1: 72 ng/kg-oc
App 2: 151 ng/kg-oc
Resulting sediment targets from crab:
App 1: 126 ng/kg-oc
App 2: 253 ng/kg-oc
Resulting sediment targets from Resulting sediment targets from crabcrab:
App 1: 126 ng/kg-oc
App 2: 253 ng/kg-oc
Data from 4 events
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E+04 1E+05
median BSAF (0.01003)
ratio (avg catfish/avg sediment-oc)
Conc
entra
tion
in C
atfis
h (n
g/kg
)
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E+04 1E+05
median BSAF (0.0042)
ratio (avg crab/avg sediment-oc)(0 0021)
Conc
entra
tion
in C
rabs
(ng/
kg)
Sediment concentration (ng/kg-oc)
Deep and shallow sample resultsDeep and shallow sample results
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
2378
-TCD
D
1237
8-Pe
CDD
1234
78-H
xCDD
1236
78-H
xCDD
1237
89-H
xCDD
1234
678-
HpCD
D
OCDD
2378
-TCD
F
1237
8-Pe
CDF
2347
8-Pe
CDF
1234
78-H
xCDF
1236
78-H
xCDF
2346
78-H
xCDF
1237
89-H
xCDF
1234
678-
HpCD
F
1234
789-
HpCD
F
OCDF
Conc
entra
tion
in W
ater
(pg/
L)
11193-Shallow11193-Deep
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
2378
-TCD
D
1237
8-Pe
CDD
1234
78-H
xCDD
1236
78-H
xCDD
1237
89-H
xCDD
1234
678-
HpCD
D
OCDD
2378
-TCD
F
1237
8-Pe
CDF
2347
8-Pe
CDF
1234
78-H
xCDF
1236
78-H
xCDF
2346
78-H
xCDF
1237
89-H
xCDF
1234
678-
HpCD
F
1234
789-
HpCD
F
OCDF
Conc
entra
tion
in W
ater
(pg/
L)
15979-Shallow15979-Deep
DissolvedDissolved--suspended fugacity ratiossuspended fugacity ratios
1.E-03
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+0123
78-T
CDD
1237
8-Pe
CDD
1234
78-H
xCDD
1236
78-H
xCDD
1237
89-H
xCDD
1234
678-
HpCD
D
OCDD
2378
-TCD
F
1237
8-Pe
CDF
2347
8-Pe
CDF
1234
78-H
xCDF
1236
78-H
xCDF
2346
78-H
xCDF
1237
89-H
xCDF
1234
678-
HpCD
F
1234
789-
HpCD
F
OCDF
Fuga
city R
atio
(fs/fw
)
11193-sh11193-de15979-sh15979-de
Equilibrium
sh=shallow
de=deep
sediment water column flux
water column sediment flux
DissolvedDissolved--bottom sediment fugacity ratiosbottom sediment fugacity ratios
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+0223
78-T
CDD
1237
8-Pe
CDD
1234
78-H
xCDD
1236
78-H
xCDD
1237
89-H
xCDD
1234
678-
HpCD
D
OCDD
2378
-TCD
F
1237
8-Pe
CDF
2347
8-Pe
CDF
1234
78-H
xCDF
1236
78-H
xCDF
2346
78-H
xCDF
1237
89-H
xCDF
1234
678-
HpCD
F
1234
789-
HpCD
F
OCDF
Fuga
city R
atio
(fs/fw
)
11193-de15979-de
de=deep
Equilibriumsediment water column flux
water column sediment flux
HighHigh--resolution sediment samplingresolution sediment sampling
8.1-11.711.7-15.915.9-20.420.4-32.032.0-55.1
TEQ (ng/kg-dry wt)
HighHigh--resolution sediment sampling resultsresolution sediment sampling results
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
600011
280
1839
2
1127
1
1127
0
1839
1
1126
9
1598
0
1597
9
1126
8
1126
7
1119
7
1838
8
1838
9
1119
3
1839
0
TEQ
in S
edim
ent (
ng/kg
-oc) Main Channel (segments 1007-1006) San Jacinto River
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
350011
280
1839
2
1127
1
1127
0
1839
1
1126
9
1598
0
1597
9
1126
8
1126
7
1119
7
1838
8
1838
9
1119
3
1839
02378
-TCD
D in
Sed
imen
t (ng
/kg-o
c)
Main Channel (segments 1007-1006) San Jacinto River
Sediment concentrations along15979 transectSediment concentrations along15979 transect
0
500
1000
1500
2000
A B C D E
TEQ
in S
edim
ent (
ng/kg
-oc)
0200400600800
10001200
A B C D E2378
-TCD
D in
Sed
imen
t (ng
/kg-o
c)
Sediment core locationsSediment core locations
Sediment aging and deposition rate estimates underway
Dioxin concentrations in 11261 coreDioxin concentrations in 11261 core
05
1015202530354045
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Concentration (ng/kg-dry wt)
Dept
h (cm
)
2378-TCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDD 23478-PeCDF TEQOCDD/100
Dioxin concentrations in 15244 coreDioxin concentrations in 15244 core
2378-TCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDD 23478-PeCDF TEQOCDD/100
0
10
20
30
40
500 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Concentration (ng/kg-dry wt)
Dept
h (cm
)
Dioxin concentrations in 11193 coreDioxin concentrations in 11193 core
2378-TCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDD 23478-PeCDF TEQOCDD/100
05
1015202530354045
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Concentration (ng/kg-dry wt)
Dept
h (cm
)
Air monitoring locationsAir monitoring locations
Clinton Dr
Lang
Haden Rd
Bayland Park
Mont Belvieu
Dioxin in ambient airDioxin in ambient airTo
tal T
EQ in
Am
bien
t Air
(fg/m
3)
Tota
l TEQ
in A
mbi
ent A
ir (fg
/m3)
0
2
4
6
8
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Haden Rd.
0
2
4
6
8
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Clinton Dr.
0
2
4
6
8
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Bayland Park
0
2
4
6
8
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Lang
0
2
4
6
8
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Mont Belvieu
Monthly average concentrations in airMonthly average concentrations in air
0
10
20
30
40
50
sep oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul augMonth
Conc
entra
tion
(fg/m
3 )
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1,2,3,
4,6,7,
8-HpC
DD, O
CDD
(fg/m3 )
TEMP (°C) 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD2,3,7,8-HxCDDs 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD OCDD
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
sep oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may jun jul augMonth
Conc
entra
tion
(fg/m
3 )
10
50
90
130
170
210
250
2,3,7,
8-HxC
DFs,
2,3,7,
8-HpC
DFs
OCDF
(fg/
m3 )TEMP (°C) 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF2,3,7,8-HxCDFs 2,3,7,8-HpCDFs OCDF
Dioxins by particle sizeDioxins by particle size
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
>7.2 um 7.2-3.0 3.0-1.5 1.5-0.95 0.95-0.49 <0.49 umCascade Impactor Stages
PCDD
s & P
CDFs
conc
entra
tion
(fg/m
3 )
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Parti
cle M
ass C
once
ntra
tion
(ug/
m3)
2378-PCDDs2378-PCDFsParticle mass conc
Dioxin in ambient air (SeptDioxin in ambient air (Sept--Oct, 2004)Oct, 2004)
519
54228165530.9
125
8942 4 30
100
200
300
400
500
600
2,3,7,
8-TC
DD
1,2,3,
7,8-P
eCDD
1,2,3,
4,7,8-
HxCD
D
1,2,3,
6,7,8-
HxCD
D
1,2,3,
7,8,9-
HxCD
D
1,2,3,
4,6,7,
8-Hp
CDD
OCDD
2,3,7,
8-TC
DF
1,2,3,
7,8-P
eCDF
2,3,4,
7,8-P
eCDF
1,2,3,
4,7,8-
HxCD
F
1,2,3,
6,7,8-
HxCD
F
2,3,4,
6,7,8-
HxCD
F
1,2,3,
7,8,9-
HxCD
F
1,2,3,
4,6,7,
8-Hp
CDF
1,2,3,
4,7,8,
9-Hp
CDF
OCDF
Conc
entra
tions
(fg/
m3)
Air deposition Air deposition –– sampling locationssampling locations
DryDry--deposition samplingdeposition sampling
Average deposition velocity (cm/sec)
2378-TCDD 4.2
OCDD 0.2
2378-TCDF 1.3
OCDF 0.3
Average deposition flux (fg/m2-hr)
2378-TCDD 43
OCDD 6,880
2378-TCDF 44
OCDF 410
Total TEQ in runoffTotal TEQ in runoff
2005 sampling site
2002 sampling site
candidate site
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
Conceptual model for dioxins in the HSCConceptual model for dioxins in the HSC
Stack emissions
Dispersion
Dry d
epos
ition
Wet
dep
ositi
on
Discharges from tributaries
Runoff
Equilibrium partitioning
Discharges from GW
Bottom sediments
Volat
ilizat
ion
BurialResuspension
Dissolved phase
BSAFBSAF
Suspended solids
IN
OUT
Photodegradation
Biodegradation
Point source effluent
BAF
Segmentation for simplified modelSegmentation for simplified model
Loading schematicLoading schematic
1 Main channel segment (14 in total)
1 Boundary segment (13 in total)
1 Loading segment (11 in total)
1 benthic segment (not shown)
PS for simplified modelPS for simplified model
Segment Total flow (m 3/s)
2378-TCDD load (kg/day)
TSS load (kg/day)
1 3.9E-04 5.7E-13 8.9E-032 2.5E+00 2.0E-09 17923 4.4E-01 2.9E-09 3104 1.4E+00 5.1E-11 9845 1.6E+00 1.6E-09 15936 9.0E-01 1.7E-09 6237 1.1E+00 1.3E-08 768
18 5.0E-01 2.7E-09 34719 1.1E-01 1.4E-09 7721 1.7E+00 3.3E-09 1173
NPS for simplified modelNPS for simplified model
Segment Area (km 2)
Avg. daily rainfall (in)
2378-TCDD load (kg/day)
TSS load (kg/day)
1 1244 0.13 3.1E-08 467282 339 0.13 1.2E-08 308523 242 0.14 7.3E-09 100264 62 0.13 2.0E-09 38785 91 0.16 2.7E-09 52136 585 0.14 1.4E-08 558607 14 0.14 3.6E-10 12428 98 0.17 2.2E-09 7618
18 1125 0.18 1.8E-08 6173522 85 0.17 2.1E-09 415123 50 0.14 1.2E-09 3980
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--dissolveddissolved
0.01
0.1
1
10
0510152025303540
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
2378
-TCD
D (p
g/L)
Base case settling vel*10 settling vel*100 settling vel*1000settling vel/10 settling vel/100 settling vel/1000 no settling
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--dissolveddissolved
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0510152025303540
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
2378
-TCD
D (p
g/L)
Base case benthic exchange*100 benthic exchange/10benthic exchange/100 no benthic exchange
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--suspendedsuspended
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0510152025303540
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
2378
-TCD
D (n
g/kg
)
Base case settling vel*10 settling vel*100 settling vel*1000settling vel/10 settling vel/100 settling vel/1000 no settling
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--suspendedsuspended
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
0510152025303540
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
2378
-TCD
D (n
g/kg
)
Base case benthic exchange*100 benthic exchange/10benthic exchange/100 no benthic exchange
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--suspendedsuspended
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.20
0510152025303540
Base case Sorption*10 Sorption*100 Sorption/10 Sorption/100
Sensitivity analysisSensitivity analysis--suspendedsuspended
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0510152025303540
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
2378
-TCD
D (n
g/kg
)
Base case NPS no PS PS loads*2PS loads*5 PS loads/2 PS loads/5 NPS*2
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
Stakeholder process participationStakeholder process participation
Meeting at Port of Houston Authority on 05/17/2004Meeting at UH on 05/24/2004Responses to comments from stakeholdersTechnical presentations at
The Haden Road CAP on 03/22/2004Board Meeting of the GBEP on 04/22/2004The Baytown Area CAP on 05/17/2004
Main tasks Phase III Main tasks Phase III –– (WO7)(WO7)
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Develop a QAPP for additional data collection
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Conduct dioxin monitoring and additional data collection in the HSC
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Model fate and transport of dioxins in the HSC using sophisticated
models
Estimate TMDL allocationsEstimate TMDL allocations
Participate in stakeholder processParticipate in stakeholder process
Evaluate PCB data gathered to dateEvaluate PCB data gathered to date
PCB assessmentPCB assessment
209 congeners (EPA 1668A) vs Aroclors (EPA 8082)
Texas WQS for total PCBs (based on Aroclors)1.3 ng/L in freshwater0.885 ng/L in saltwater
TDH screening value 47 ng/g (based on Aroclors)
PCB and dioxin in water profilesPCB and dioxin in water profiles
Texas PCB WQS: 885 pg/L
Texas dioxin WQS: 0.0933 pg/L
Open symbols: dioxin TEQClosed symbols total PCBsPlotted data are averages by station
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(pg/
L)
Main channel San Jacinto River Side Bays
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
PCB and dioxin in sedimentPCB and dioxin in sediment--ococ profilesprofiles
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
1E+7
1E+8
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(ng/
kg-o
c)
Main channel San Jacinto River Side Bays Tributaries
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Open symbols dioxin TEQClosed symbols total PCBsPlotted data are averages by station
PCB and dioxin in catfish profilesPCB and dioxin in catfish profiles
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
1E+7
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(pg/
L)
Main channel San Jacinto River Side Bays Tributaries
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
Open symbols dioxin TEQClosed symbols total PCBsPlotted data are averages by station
TDH PCB screening value: 47,000 ng/kg
TDH dioxin screening value: 0.47 ng/kg
PCB and dioxin in crab profilesPCB and dioxin in crab profiles
1E-1
1E+0
1E+1
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
1E+5
1E+6
1E+7
-20-15-10-505101520253035404550
Distance from Morgan's Point (km)
Conc
entra
tions
(pg/
L)
Main channel San Jacinto River Side Bays Tributaries
1007 242110051006
Morgan's Point
TDH PCB screening value: 47,000 ng/kg
TDH dioxin screening value: 0.47 ng/kg
Open symbols dioxin TEQClosed symbols total PCBsPlotted data are averages by station
PCB assessmentPCB assessment
Water concentrations showed a Tier-1 primary concern based on congener analysis in segments 1006 and 1007. Aroclor data showed no concern.Tissue data confirms a concern for PCBs in catfish in segments 1001, 1006, and 1007 (congener data). Aroclor data showed concern in 1001 only.Congener data in catfish showed potential concerns in Sims Bayou, Vince Bayou, Patrick Bayou, Buffalo Bayou, and Whiteoak Bayou.Need to evaluate Aroclor and congener data and determine listings and define methodology to compare congener data and to establish criteria to assess use support.
Total number of dioxin samplesTotal number of dioxin samples
33
45
45
45
69
45
87
115
117
108
75
47
In-stream water
Sediment
Catfish
Crab
Sludge
Effluent
28
17
28
28
-
-
71
68
53
47
-
-
MediaMedia Phase II#sites #samples
Phase III#sites #samples
Total number of dioxin samplesTotal number of dioxin samples--contcont’’dd
-
10
5
-
-
-
-
-
11
87
-
-
-
-
Sediment cores
Runoff
Ambient air
Dry deposition
Wet deposition
Bulk deposition
Particulate
6
3
2
2
2
1
1
70
71
68
53
47
1
18
MediaMedia Phase II#sites #samples
Phase III#sites #samples