Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
City Planning October 2009DRAFT
Toronto Urban Design Guidelines
Bloor Corridor Visioning Study:Avenue Road to Bathurst Street
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�
DRAFt
table of contents
1. IntroductIon ...................................................................................................................1 1.1Background.............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2VisionStatement..................................................................................................................... 3 1.3TheBloorCorridorUrbanDesignGuidelines........................................................................ 4
2. context .............................................................................................................................5 2.1DefinitionoftheBloorCorridor............................................................................................ 5 2.2PlanningContext..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1ProvincialPlanningDocuments.................................................................................... 6 2.2.2OfficialPlan................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.3ZoningBy-law............................................................................................................... 7 2.2.4DesignCriteriafortheReviewofTallBuildingProposals......................................... 7 2.2.5AdditionalRelevantCityofTorontoPublications...................................................... 9
3. development prIncIples ............................................................................................10 3.1Sustainability......................................................................................................................... 10 3.2Diversity.................................................................................................................................. 10 3.3BuiltForm.............................................................................................................................. 10 3.4PublicRealm...........................................................................................................................11 3.5HeritageandCulture..............................................................................................................11
4. structure plan .............................................................................................................12 4.1NodesandPrecincts.............................................................................................................. 12 4.1.1InstitutionalPrecinct................................................................................................... 13 4.1.2OISEBlock.................................................................................................................... 17 4.1.3SpadinaNode............................................................................................................... 19 4.1.4UniversityofTorontoSites......................................................................................... 23 4.1.5MainStreetArea.......................................................................................................... 24 4.1.6BathurstNode.............................................................................................................. 25 4.2PublicRealmFramework...................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1OpenSpaceNetwork................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2PublicSpaces............................................................................................................... 28 4.2.3Streetscapes.................................................................................................................. 30 4.3Gateways,ViewsandTerminusSites....................................................................................31 4.4Heritage.................................................................................................................................. 34 4.5PublicArtProgram................................................................................................................ 36 4.6SupportingActiveTransportation........................................................................................ 37
5. General buIlt form GuIdelInes ..............................................................................38 5.1PedestrianScaleDesignConsiderations............................................................................... 39 5.1.1InterfacewiththeSidewalk........................................................................................ 39 5.1.2Parking&Loading....................................................................................................... 39 5.1.3Mid-blockconnections................................................................................................ 39 5.1.4Safety............................................................................................................................ 40 5.2StreetWallScaleDesignConsiderations.............................................................................. 40 5.2.1StreetWall.................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.2BuildingElements........................................................................................................ 42 5.2.3OrientationandPlacement......................................................................................... 42 5.2.4ParkingandServicing.................................................................................................. 42 5.3UrbanScaleDesignConsiderations...................................................................................... 43 5.3.1BuildingHeightsandTransition................................................................................. 43 5.3.2ShadowsandPedestrianComfort.............................................................................. 45 5.4SustainableDesign................................................................................................................ 46
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�
DRAFt
1. IntroductIonTheBloorCorridor,definedinthisdocumentasBloorStreetWestbetweenAvenueRoadandBathurstStreet,isahigh-traffic,mixed-usedistrictservingvariouspublic,privateandinstitutionaluses.ItlinksthreeBusinessImprovementAreascentredonBloorStreetWestandconnectsseveraldistinctandstableresidentialneighbourhoods.Hometomajorcultural,academicandotherinstitutions,aswellasavibrantretail/commercialarea,itattractsresidents,studentsandvisitorsfrombothlocalandregionallevels.TheBloorCorridorisarouteforthemovementofpedestrians,vehiclesandgoodsinto,outofandthroughthearea,withsomeofthehighestcyclingvolumesinthecity,andhasbecomebothadestinationandasourceofurbanvitalityandactivity.
Figure 1: Aerial image of Study AreaOverthelengthoftheBloorCorridor,severalidentifiableareasemergeaccordingtothepatternoftheexistingurbanfabric.TothewestofWalmerRoad,thebuiltformishighlyconsistent,withtwo-andthree-storeymixed-usebuildingsliningbothsidesofBloorStreetinafine-grained,compactform.TheareaeastofWalmerRoadfeatureslargerbuildingfootprintsandvariabilityinheights:generally,high-riseapartmentsandofficebuildingsarefoundonthenorthsideofBloorStreet;whilethesouthsideconsistsmainlyofsignificantmedium-riseinstitutionalbuildingswithlargebuildingfootprints,openspaces,andgeneroussetbacks.TheseguidelineshavebeencreatedtoreinforceandrespondtothesecharacteristicsastheBloorCorridordevelopsovertime.
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 2
DRAFt
1.1 backGround: bloor corrIdor vIsIonInG studyIn2007,theCitylaunchedtheBloorCorridorVisioningStudytocreateadevelopmentstrategythatwouldprotecttheexistingdistinctandstableresidentialneighbourhoodsadjacenttothecorridorwhileaccommodatingsomeintensificationascontemplatedinToronto’sOfficialPlan.Throughacomprehensivepublicengagementstrategy,theVisioningStudyallowedallstakeholders(residents,businessowners,propertyowners,politicalrepresentatives)tocontributetothedefinitionofprinciplesthatwouldshapethelong-termdevelopmentofthiscorridor.
TheVisioningStudy’smainobjectivesincluded:
■ DevelopingacoherenturbandesignconceptfortheBloorCorridor;
■ Establishingprinciplesforthebuiltformoffuturedevelopment;
■ Identifyingopportunitiesforpotentialpublicrealmimprovementsandenhancingthepedestrianizationofthecorridor;
■ SettingreasonableexpectationsforintensificationalongtheBloorCorridorbyexaminingappropriateareasfordevelopment;
■ Protectingandenhancingstablelow-riseresidentialneighbourhoods,aswellasheritageandculturalresources;and
■ EnsuringthatchangeintheBloorCorridor–andparticularlydevelopment–contributestoenvironmentalsustainability.
InMay2008,theCity’sconsultants,ledbyOfficeforUrbanism,submittedtheirfinalreportontheVisioningStudyprocess.
The Bloor Corridor: Gateway to the Downtown
Ecology Park
The Royal Ontario Museum
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�
DRAFt
1.2 vIsIon statementTheVisioningStudyexerciseresultedinthefollowingVisionStatementfortheBloorCorridor:
"Stable neighbourhoods should be protected by directing planned growth towards areas along the corridor such that, in the long term, a coherent urban structure will emerge. The visual character of each precinct will be maintained on properties fronting Bloor Street. In particular, the traditional main street character from Walmer Road to Bathurst Street will be protected, and infill in this area will be designed with elements that complement the existing character.
Bloor Street between Avenue Road and Bathurst Street should be developed as a pedestrian priority area. This study proposes that a westbound lane west of Spadina Avenue may be removed to accommodate sidewalk expansions. This in turn would accommodate a continuous green promenade contributing to an enjoyable walking experience. It would also visually connect a necklace of open spaces / parks proposed by this study on the south side of Bloor Street between Avenue Road to Bathurst Street, which would create a friendlier interface between institutional uses and public spaces. The public realm should also be enhanced through the creation of new plazas; the Museum Plaza in front of the Royal Ontario Museum would add more programmable space for city-wide cultural activities while a Trinity St. Paul’s Church Plaza proposed for the future would provide a neighbourhood focus for local events.
Sustainability will be the leading objective in both future developments and the evolution of the public realm. Evaluative criteria that can measure the evolution of this corridor into a sustainable district should be created towards this end. The environmental impact of new and existing development will be informed by the City of Toronto Green Standard."
Thisvisionstatementprovidesthebasisforidentifyingcommunitypriorities,developingpoliciesandguidinganurbandesignconceptforthelong-termdevelopmentofthecorridor.
Philosopher's Walk
Bloor Street at Bathurst Street
Bloor - Bedford Parkette
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �
DRAFt
1.3 the bloor corrIdor urban desIGn GuIdelInesThisdocumentformsasetofguidelines,endorsedbyCityCouncil,whichbuildonsite-specificOfficialPlanpoliciesandapplicablezoningby-lawsthatsetoutlanduse,builtformandpublicrealmobjectives.ThegoaloftheseguidelinesistoimprovethequalityofthephysicalenvironmentintheBloorCorridorandensurethatthoseelements,whichcontributetothespecialcharacterofthediversepartsofthearea,areretainedandenhanced.
TheBloorCorridorUrbanDesignGuidelinesdefineanurbanstructurefortheareaaswellasprinciplesforresponsibleandsensitivedevelopment.Generally,theseguidelinesdescribethedistinctnodesandprecinctsthatcomprisetheBloorCorridorandprovidedirectionforimprovementstothepublicrealm.Specifically,they:
■ provideavisionofthedesiredurbanstructurefortheareaandaframeworkfordevelopment;
■ defineappropriaterelationshipsbetweenbuildingsandthepublicrealm;
■ provideappropriatebuiltformguidanceaddressingmatterssuchassetbacksandmassing;
■ identifyopportunitiestoimprovethepublicrealm;and
■ provideatool,whichcanbeusedinevaluatingapplicationsforsiteplanapprovalandrezoning,aswellasforco-ordinatingpublicimprovementstobeundertaken.
TheBloorCorridorUrbanDesignGuidelinesprovideadditionalcontextandguidancetobuilduponthevision,whichwasdevelopedinconsultationwiththeworkinggroupandOfficeforUrbanismin2007-08andledtothecreationofarea-specificpoliciesinChapterSevenoftheCity’sOfficialPlan.
Heritage elements
The OISE block
Ecology Park
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�
DRAFt
2. context2.1 defInItIon of the bloor corrIdor
ForthepurposeoftheseGuidelines,theBloorCorridorreferstoallpropertiesfrontingontoBloorStreetWest,betweenAvenueRoadtotheeastandBathurstStreettothewest.ItisimportanttonotethattheselandswereidentifiedasPhase1oftheentireBloorCorridorarea,whichalsoincludesPhase2landsbetweenBathurstStreettotheeastandChristie/GraceStreetstothewest(seeFigure2).Asthe2007-2008VisioningStudydealtwiththePhaseIlandsonly,theseguidelinesonlyapplyeastofBathurstStreet.WhenastudyiscompletedforthePhase2lands,resultinginarea-specificOfficialPlanpoliciesand/orurbandesignguidelines,theymaybeappendedtothisdocument.
TheBloorCorridorincludesmanykeycivicandinstitutionaldestinationssuchastheUniversityofToronto(inparticular,VarsityStadium),theRoyalOntarioMuseum,theRoyalConservatoryofMusic,theBataShoeMuseum,andtheMilesNadalJewishCommunityCentre.Italsoincludesnumerousretailandofficespacesatvaryingscales.Intermsofretailcharacter,thestudyareaincludesestablished‘local’retailshopsinthewestendwhichcontrastswiththe‘regional’destinationshopsandhotelstowardstheeast.Theareaisexceptionallywell-servicedbypublictransitwithfoursubwaystationsprovidingaccesstoboththeBloor-DanforthandYonge-University-Spadinalines,aswellasaccesstotheLightRapidTransitlineonSpadinaAvenue.Thestudyareaisalsoservicedbyseveralbusroutes,includinganightbusserviceroutealongBloorStreet.
Figure 2: Context Map and Area of Influence
A R E A O F I N F L U E N C E
A R E A O F I N F L U E N C E
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
MA
RK
HA
M S
TR
EE
T
PA
LME
RS
TO
N B
OU
LEV
AR
DP
ALM
ER
ST
ON
BLV
D
EU
CLI
D A
VE
NU
EE
UC
LID
AV
EN
UE
MA
NN
ING
AV
EN
UE
CLI
NT
ON
ST
RE
ET
MA
NN
ING
AV
EN
UE
CLI
NT
ON
ST
RE
ET
GR
AC
E S
TR
EE
T
CH
RIS
TIE
ST
RE
ET
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
ALB
AN
Y A
VE
NU
E
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
T
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
L
HARBORD STREET
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
LENNOX STREET
BLOOR STREET WEST
WA
LME
RR
OA
D
Phase 1Phase 2
TTC entrance at Walmer Road
Retail-Commercial uses west of Spadina
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �
DRAFt
AnimportantelementoftheVisioningStudyhasbeentheconsiderationofan‘AreaofInfluence’surroundingtheStudyAreathatincludestheneighbourhoodsofChristiePits,BickfordPark,Palmerston,HarbordVillage,Huron/Sussex,theUniversityofTorontoSt.GeorgeCampus,Yorkville,andtheAnnex.Generally,theAreaofInfluence,exceptfortheUniversityofTorontoproperties,consistsofstableandmainlylow-riseresidentialneighbourhoods.
2.2 plannInG context
2.2.1 provIncIal plannInG documents
The2005ProvincialPolicyStatement(PPS)providesdirectionondevelopmentandlanduseplanningmatters,indicatingwhereintensificationandredevelopmentisappropriate,andwhatconsiderationsshouldbeapplied.ThePPSstatesthatintensificationandredevelopmentinbuilt-upareasshouldprovideamixofuses,housingandemploymentopportunities,parksandopenspaces,andtransportationchoicespromotingpedestrianmovement.
Ontario’sPlacestoGrowAct(2006)providesavisionandGrowthPlanfortheGreaterGoldenHorseshoe,whichcentresontheGreaterTorontoArea.TheGrowthPlanisapolicyapproachthatidentifiesurbangrowthcentres,setstargetsforpopulationandemploymentdensityandsupportsexpandedinfrastructureingrowthareastoprotectandconserveruralandgreenbeltlands.ThisstrategyisconsistentwithToronto’snewOfficialPlanandisthebasisforintensifyingexistingurbanareas,includingtheDowntown,withinwhichtheBloorCorridorislocated.
2.2.2 offIcIal plan
TheCityofToronto’sOfficialPlanidentifiestheBloorCorridorasbeingpartofToronto’sDowntownarea.Inparticular,asshowninFigure3,themajorityofthecorridorisdesignatedMixed Use Areas,withtheexceptionsofInstitutional AreassouthofBlooratAvenueRoad,andtwolocalParksfrontingBloorStreet.Thesurrounding‘AreaofInfluence’consistsprimarilyofexistingstableNeighbourhoodsandApartment Neighbourhoods,aswellasMixed Use Areas,ParksandInstitutional AreastowardtheeasternendoftheCorridor.
Bata Shoe Museum
Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�
DRAFt
WhiletheDowntownandMixed Use Areasarespecificallyidentifiedforintensification,theOfficialPlanalsorecognizesthevalueofestablishedneighbourhoodstotheCityofToronto.ThePlanincludespoliciesandcriteriafornewdevelopmentregardingappropriatebuildinglocation,massing,compatibilitywithsurroundings,protectionofadjacentNeighbourhoodsandtreatmentofthepublicrealm.
WithinInstitutional Areas,majoreducational,health,governmentalinstitutionsandtheirancillaryusesareregardedasimportantemployersandserviceprovidersthatwillcontinuetogrowtoservetheneedsofanincreasingcityandregionalpopulation.Theseinstitutionsareencouragedtocreatecampusplansinconsultationwithnearbycommunitiesthatcanaccommodateplannedgrowthwhileminimizingitsimpact.
Area-specificpoliciesidentifythecharacterofvariousdistrictswithintheBloorCorridorandcallfornewdevelopmenttorespondtoandenhancethosecharacteristicsthroughbuiltform,sustainablepractices,andopportunitiestoimprovethepublicrealm.
Figure 3: Land Use Designations - excerpt from the City of Toronto's Official Plan
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
MA
JOR
STR
EE
T
RO
BE
RT
STR
EE
T
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
SPA
DIN
A R
OA
D
SPA
DIN
A A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
STR
EE
TH
OW
LAN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
ALB
AN
Y A
VE
NU
E
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT S
T
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
AVE
NU
E R
OA
D
BE
DFO
RD
RO
AD
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VON
SH
IRE
PLA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREET
WASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WAL
MER
RO
AD
Neighbourhoods
Apartment Neighbourhoods
Mixed Use Areas
Institutional Areas
Parks & Open Space Areas
Parks
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �
DRAFt
2.2.3 ZonInG by-law
ZoningBy-law438-86,asamended,oftheformerCityofTorontopermitsmixed-usedevelopmentthroughthemajorityofthecorridor,andonlyinstitutionalusesalongthesouthsideofBloor,fromtheRoyalConservatoryofMusicsitethroughtoAvenueRoad.PermittedheightsanddensitiesarelowestbetweenBathurstStreetandWalmerRoad,withheightsincreasingincrementally,movingeastwardtoAvenueRoad.RecentdevelopmentsbetweenBedfordRoadandAvenueRoad,approvedonasite-specificbasis,haveexceededthegeneralheightanddensitypermissionsandcreatedanewbuiltformcontextforthispartofthedistrict.Permittedheightsanddensitiesinthesurroundingneighbourhoodstendtobelowerinscale.Throughoutthearea,controlstolimittheplacementandmassingofbuildingsarealsoregulatedbytheZoningBy-law.
2.2.4 desIGn crIterIa for the revIew of tall buIldInG proposals
TheDesignCriteriafortheReviewofTallBuildingProposals(TallBuildingGuidelines),adoptedin2006,indicatepreferreddesignconsiderationsfor‘tallbuildings’andtheanalysisrequiredoftheirpotentialimpacts.Abuildingisdefinedas‘tall’whenitsheightisgreaterthantheright-of-way
Figure 4: Zoning By-law Designations
Tall buildings within the Bloor Corridor
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
MA
JOR
STR
EE
T
RO
BE
RT
STR
EE
T
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
SPA
DIN
A R
OA
D
SPA
DIN
A A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
STR
EE
T
CR
OFT
HO
WLA
ND
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
ALB
AN
Y A
VE
NU
E
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT S
T
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
AVE
NU
E R
OA
D
BE
DFO
RD
RO
AD
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VON
SH
IRE
PLA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WAL
MER
RO
AD
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 20099
DRAFt
City of Toronto's Green Development Standard
widthoftheprincipalstreetonwhichitislocated,orthewideroftwoprincipalstreetsiflocatedatanimportantintersection.TheseCity-wideguidelinesareinplacetoensurethattallbuildingsdonotadverselyaffectpublicspace(openspace,streetscapes,buildingedges),thelocalenvironment(wind,shadow,micro-climates),heritagebuildings,andconcernslikeprivacy,light,andsafety.Thedocumentalsoaddressessustainablebuildingpracticessuchasbuildingorientation,lightingandheatingsystems,andgreenroofs.AnyapplicationsfortallbuildingswithintheBloorStreetCorridoraresubjecttotheseguidelines.
2.2.5 addItIonal relevant cIty of toronto publIcatIons
AdditionalplanninganddesigninitiativesthatprovidecontextandguidancefordevelopmentandwhichshouldbeconsideredincludethefollowingCityofTorontopublications:
■ UrbanDesignHandbook
■ StreetscapeManual
■ AccessibilityDesignGuidelines
■ PreservingNeighbourhoodStreetscapes
■ TorontoGreenStandardandGreenRoofBy-law
■ Bird-FriendlyDevelopmentGuidelines
■ DesignGuidelinesfor‘Greening’SurfaceParkingLots
■ GuidelinesfortheDesignandManagementofBicycleParkingFacilities
■ EastAnnexHeritageConservationDistrictStudy
■ HarbordVillageHeritageConservationDistrictStudy-Phase1
■ EmergingstudiesonHarbordVillageandAnnexHeritageConservationDistricts
■ UniversityofTorontoSecondaryPlan(CityofTorontoOfficialPlan,ChapterSix)
■ BuildingTorontoTogether:ADevelopmentGuide
■ AvenuesandMid-RiseBuildingsStudy(ongoing)
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �0
DRAFt
3. development prIncIples
Thefollowingprinciplesformthebasisforanurbandesignstrategyspecifictogrowth,developmentandimprovementstothepublicrealmwithintheBloorCorridorarea:
3.1 sustaInabIlIty – toronto Green standardAsBloorStreetchanges,itwillbuildonitsprimelocationwithinthecityanditsexceptionalpublictransitaccesssothatitmayshowcaseexamplesofsustainablelivinganddevelopment.BloorStreetwillpromotesustainabilityinmovement,energyuse,buildingtechnology,and“green”infrastructure-andwillimplementcreativesolutionstothechallengesoftreeplantinginthepublicright-of-way,andofgreeningingeneral.
3.2 dIversItyBloorStreetwillcontinuetosupportawidevarietyofretail,residential,employment,institutionalandopenspacelanduses,andwillintegratethemtoensureanactive,well-usedstreetatalltimesofthedayandallseasons.Mixedretailatgrade,aswellasinstitutionalbuildings,shouldco-existwithofficeandresidentialuses.Neighbourhoodsshouldmaintainaspiritofinclusivenessandresidentialdiversitythatcanbeensuredbysupportingavarietyofhousingtypes,sizes,andtenuresthatwillsatisfyalltypesofhouseholds.
3.3 buIlt form Buildingsshouldcontributetothecoherenceofthestreetscapethroughhighqualitydesign,andthroughappropriatetransitionsbetweenbuildingsandtheirsurroundingcontext.Newbuildingsshouldbedesignedtolimitimpactsonadjacentareasbyensuringadequatelight,viewsandprivacy.Densitywillbedirectedtotransitnodes.BuildingsalongBloorStreetshouldprovideatransitioninheightandbuiltform:onasite-by-sitebasis;alongthecorridorbetweennodes;andtothenorthandsouthinordertoprotectexistingstableresidentialneighbourhoodsfromthepotentialnegativeimpactsofdevelopment.
Seeking "greening" opportunities
Built form potential in the Bloor Corridor
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
Trinity-St. Paul's Church - a heritage landmark
3.4 publIc realm BloorStreetshouldbeanactive,invitingandbeautifulstreetforallusers,providingacohesivepublicenvironmentwhilelinkingthedistinctcharacteristicsofitsvariousdistricts.Citypoliciesandactionsshouldprotect,enhanceandseeknewopportunitiestodevelopparkettesandplacestosit.Thestreetshouldprovideactiveat-gradeusesthataresafe,accessible,andinterconnected.Thisstrategycanbesupportedwiththeprovisionofcoordinatedstreetfurniturethatsupportsyear-round,aswellasall-dayactivities.Asadestination,BloorStreetwillaccommodateallmodesoftravel,withaparticularemphasisonpedestriansafetyandutility.Asacorridor,BloorStreetshouldbalanceitsvehicularcapacitywithahighquality,continuouspedestrianrealm.Surfaceparkingareasshouldberedeveloped,whilemeetingparkingdemandsthroughothercreativesolutions.
3.5 herItaGe and cultureHeritagepatternsofblockstructure,builtformandstreetcharacter,aswellasculturalheritage,shouldbemaintainedandenhancedtosupporttheover-archingvisionforBloorStreet.Heritageelementsbothtangible(builtform)andintangible(values,spirit-of-place,character)shouldbemaintainedandenhancedtoaddtothecharacterofthecorridor.
HighlightingandemphasisingthedistinctnodesandprecinctsoftheBloorCorridorthroughtheseguidelineswillhelpmaintainthoseaspectswhichmaketheareaunique.
Public realm enhancements at Bloor-Bedford Parkette
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �2
DRAFt
4. structure plan
TheprimarycomponentsthatmakeuptheBloorCorridor,includingstreets,parksandopenspaces,helptoestablishaframeworkforfuturedevelopmentinthearea(Figure5).Thissectionprovidesadescriptionofthekeyorganizingelements.
Figure 5: Structure Plan
4.1 nodes and precInctsTheBloorCorridoriscomposedofanumberofnodesandprecincts,eachdefinedbyitsattributesintermsoffunction,builtformandcharacter.TheorganizationoftheBloorCorridorintothesedistinctareasallowsconsiderationofthespecificsofeachsettingandensuresthatnewdevelopmentisappropriatetoitslocation.Figure6depictsthesenodesandprecincts.
Thedescriptionsprovidedbytheguidelinesofthesevariousnodesandprecinctswillhelpfurtherdefinetheindividualcharacteristicsoftheseareas.Thesecharacteristicswillhelpoutlinethelongertermgoalsandobjectivesoftheseareas,andwhereandhowgrowthshouldbeaccommodated.
LippincottTPA Lot Philosopher’s
Walk
OISE1 Bedford
EcologyPark
TrinitySt. Paul’sSquare
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
ST
GEO
RG
E S
TRE
ET
MA
JOR
STR
EE
T
RO
BE
RT
STR
EE
T
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TRE
ET
SPA
DIN
A R
OA
D
SPA
DIN
A A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
STR
EE
T
CR
OFT
HO
WLA
ND
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
ALB
AN
Y A
VE
NU
E
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT S
T
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
BAT
HU
RS
T S
TRE
ET
AVE
NU
E R
OA
D
BE
DFO
RD
RO
AD
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VON
SH
IRE
PLA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WAL
MER
RO
AD
Parks and Open Space
Mid-block Pedestrian Connection
Bloor Street “Green Necklace”
Enhanced Green Streetscape
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
Figure 6: Nodes and Precincts
Institutional Precinct: looking west from Avenue Road
North side of Bloor Street, looking east toward Avenue Road
Institutional Precinct
OISE BlockPrecinct
Spadina NodeMain Street Precinct
BathurstNode
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
AL
BA
NY
AV
EN
UE
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
TB
AT
HU
RS
T
ST
RE
ET
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
LA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
CR
OF
T
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
WA
LME
RR
OA
D
BLOOR STREET WESTBLOOR STREET WEST
4.1.1 InstItutIonal precInct
EastofMadisonAvenueandextendingtoAvenueRoad,theInstitutionalPrecinctincludesasignificantUniversityofTorontopresenceonboththenorthandsouthsidesofBloorStreet,whichismixedamongotheruses.NewbuildingsintheInstitutionalPrecinctshouldcontributetowardsthecreationofaconsistentstreetwallwithhighqualitymaterialsandactiveat-gradeuses.Theyshouldinfillgapsinthestreetscapeandprovidevisualcohesionthroughtheuseofmassingandarchitecturalelementsincludinggroundfloorheights,podiumheights,cornicelines,materials,andresponsivenesstokeyviewsandlocations.
Buildingsonthenorthsideshouldbebuiltparalleltothesetbacksoftheexistingstreetwallwhilebuildingsonthesouthsideshouldbesetbackfromtheright-of-waytopromotetheconceptofinter-connectedopenspacesthroughtheprecinct,ora“greennecklace”.
StartingwiththeRoyalOntarioMuseumandcontinuingwiththeRoyalConservatoryofMusic,VarsityStadium,theSchoolofGlobalAffairs,WoodsworthCollegeResidence,theBataShoeMuseum,SenatorCrollBuildingandendingwith371BloorStreetWestandMattCohenParkatSpadinaAvenue,thereisaconsistentprovisionof
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
outdooropenspacesbywayofbuildingsetbacksandlandscaping.Currentlythislandscapeishandledinmanydifferentways.TheremaybeopportunitiesinthefuturetoconsidergreaterdesignconsistencyandmaterialityinordertobrandthesespacesasauniqueconditionalongBloorStreet.ThroughouttheVisioningStudy,thesespaceswerereferredtoasa"NecklaceofParks".Theseguidelinesalternativelyrefertothesespacesasthe"BloorStreetGreenNecklace"discussedfurtherinSection4.2.1.
WithintheblockboundedbyBloorStreet,BedfordRoad,PrinceArthurAvenueandAvenueRoad,opportunitiestorevisitparking,lanewayandaccessarrangementsintheinterioroftheblock,inordertofacilitatethecreationofalandscapedpedestrianconnectionbetweenthosestreets,shouldbepursued.NewdevelopmentshouldalsosupportthepossibilityofconvertingtheexistinglanewayrunningnorthfromBloorStreetintoalandscapedpedestrianlinkage,withopportunitiesforactiveusesatgradelevel.
BuildingheightsbetweenBloorStreetandBedfordRoadshouldtakeintoconsiderationthepreservationandenhancementofviewsupUniversityAvenueoftheOntarioProvincialLegislature.
Thebuiltformonthenorthsideofthestreetshouldrespectexistingpodiumheightsandhavestep-backswhichrelatetotheadjacentbuildings.Largeexposedblankwallsshouldbeavoided.
IftheVarsityStadiumsiteisredeveloped,thefrontyardsetbackfromBloorStreetshouldbemaintained,consistentwithcurrentzoning.Thissetback,togetherwiththeremovaloftheexistingbrickwallliningBloorStreet,wouldenableawiderpublicrealmwithgenerousstreetscaping.TheviewterminussouthalongBedfordRoadshouldbeanimportantconsiderationforthedesignofnewbuildings,andcanbeaddressedthroughlandmarkpublicartorarchitecturaltreatment.
TheBloorStreetTransformationProjectisunderconstructioneastofAvenueRoadandinvolvesthere-claddingoftheBloorStreetsidewalksingranite.TheremaybeopportunitiesinthefutureforthisnewstreetscapetreatmentwestofAvenueRoad.
Creating a consistent streetwall: north side of Bloor
Varsity Stadium
Royal Conservatory of Music
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
Streetscaping on Bloor Street at Devonshire Place View east from St. George Street
Open space at Senator Croll Apartments east of Huron Stret
Philosopher's Walk - looking south Philosopher's Walk - looking north toward Bloor
University of Toronto Schools landscaped setback
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
Potential enhancement of "Bloor Street Green Necklace": Bloor Street at Devonshire Place
Potential enhancement of "Bloor Street Green Necklace": looking west from Varsity Stadium
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
4.1.2 the oIse block
TheOntarioInstituteforStudiesinEducation(OISE)blockencompassesthelandsboundedbyBloorStreet,St.GeorgeStreet,PrinceArthurAvenueandBedfordRoad.Theblockcontainsavarietyofbuildingtypes,includingalow-riseheritagestructure,asingle-storeysubwayentrance,andmid-andhigh-risebuildings.Thelandusesintheblockincludeinstitutional,residential,retailandtransitusesaswellassurfaceparkingandapubliclyaccessibleopenspace.
LocatedattheintersectionoftheBloor-DanforthandYonge-University-Spadinalines,thisblockisappropriateforsomeintensification.Ideally,newdevelopmentontheselandsshouldbeconsideredinthecontextofacoordinatedmasterplanfortheblockthatachieves:
■ rationalizationofpotentialsharedlaneways,parkingandserviceaccessarrangements;
■ publicrealmandopenspaceimprovements;
■ mid-blockpedestrianconnections,bothnorth-southandeast-west;
■ integrationofTTCservices;and
■ appropriatetransitiontotheNeighbourhoodtothenorth.
Ingeneral,newbuildingsshouldbedesignedtoreinforcethebuiltstreetwallonBloorStreetwhilemaintainingandenhancingopenspacewithintheblock.
Developmentat246-252BloorStreetWestandtheTTCSt.GeorgeStation–BedfordEntrance/BusLoopshouldprovideatransitioninheightfromexistingheightsonPrinceArthurAvenue(11and19storeys)towardsapeakonornearBloorStreet.AccesstoTTCservicesshouldbeinternalizedwithinnewbuildings,ormadevisibleandprominentfromBloorStreetviathepositionofnewpublicspace.Groundfloorusesshouldincludehighlyvisible,activeusesatgradetoanimatethestreetfrontage.
OnthesiteoftheYorkClub,at135St.GeorgeStreet,thehistoricGooderhamHouseshouldbemaintainedandenhanced.Developmentthatdoesnotdetractordiminishtheprominenceoftheheritagebuildingcouldbeaccommodatedontheexistingparkinglot.Accordingly,newbuildingsshouldstepdowninheightfromtheUniversityofTorontolandstotheeast,andshouldbedesignedtoframeviewstowardtheheritagestructure.
OISE Block
Potential redevelopment of Bloor-Bedford intersection showing external transit entrance
Potential redevelopment of Bloor-Bedford intersection showing internalized transit entrance
Potential development on OISE Block viewed from St. George Street
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
The“Bloor-BedfordParkette,”locatedonUniversityofTorontoproperty,isavaluableneighbourhoodopenspacethathasbeenenhancedandimprovedthrougharecentworkinggroupprocess.Thecontinualenhancementofthisspaceshouldbeincludedinlonger-termredevelopmentplansfortheblockasahighlyvisibleurbanpark,providingagatewaytotheneighbourhood.Thoughthisareamayberelocatedaspartoftheredevelopmentoftheblock,itshouldprovidethesameoragreateramountofpubliclyaccessibleopenspace,surroundedbyactive,visiblegrade-relateduseswhichmayincluderestaurantsandcafestoprovideanimationandoverlook.Theopenspacemayalsobeanappropriatelocationtointegrateanew,landmark-qualityTTCentrance.
Sketch of Bloor-Bedford Parkette enhancements
Recently completed improvements to Bloor-Bedford Parkette
Bloor-Bedford Parkette
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�9
DRAFt
4.1.3 spadIna node
TheintersectionofBloorStreetatSpadina,betweenWalmerRoadandMadisonAvenue,isakeymulti-modaltransithubwhereitisappropriatetoaccommodateintensification.Newdevelopmentatthisnodewillhelpdelineatethedifferentscales,intensityandbuiltformbetweentheInstitutionalCorridortotheeastandtheMainStreetAreatothewest.
WhilegreaterheightsanddensitiesarecontemplatedfortheSpadinaNode,itisimportantforthebuiltformofnewdevelopmenttointegratewiththelocal,mainstreetcharacteratstreetlevel.BuildingsintheSpadinaNodeshouldincorporatealow-risepodiumconsistentwiththestreetwalloftheMainStreetArea,withsimilarfine-grainedusesandcharacteristics,toprovideforacontinuouspedestrianexperience.
northwest corner
Giventheimmediatecontextofneighbouringhigh-risebuildings,significantbuildingheightatthisintersectioncanbelocatedatthenorthwestcornerofBloorandSpadina.OpportunitiestointegrateanentrancetotheexistingTTCstationintotheredevelopmentofthiscornershouldbeencouraged.
northeast corner
DevelopmentatthenortheastcorneroftheSpadinaNodewillneedtobalanceseveralurbandesignconsiderations,including:itslocationattheviewterminusofSpadinaAvenue;itsproximitytoEcologyPark;itsheightrelativetothepeakatthenorthwestcorneroftheintersection;andtransitaccess.BecauseSpadinaAvenuejogsslightlytothewestasitapproachesBloorStreet,accommodatingtheopenspaceprovidedbyMattCohenPark,thebuildingsatthenortheastcornersitattheterminusofanimportantviewnorthward.ThisisalsowithinasignificantviewcorridorfromCollegeStreet,withthespireofthehistoricUniversityofTorontoOneSpadinaCrescent,previouslytheConnaughtLaboratoriesbuilding,asitsfocus.Forthesereasons,thedesignofnewbuildingsatthenortheastcornershouldhaveparticularregardforlandmarkarchitecturaltreatmentwithattentionpaidtobuildingarticulation,roofline,andthequalityofmaterials.Atthesametime,buildingsshouldnotbebuilttoaheightthatwoulddetractfromthesilhouetteoftheOneSpadinaCrescentbuildingspire,asviewedfromCollegeStreet.
NewdevelopmentshouldalsomitigateanyshadowimpactsonEcologyPark,whichmaybeachieved
Recent development to the south of Miles Nadal JCC
Matt Cohen Park
Spadina Avenue jog with Matt Cohen Park to the right
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 20
DRAFt
bypositioningatallerbuildingelementclosertothecorner,withlowerheightsmovingeasttowardsMadisonAvenue(seeFigure7).ThevisibilityandconnectivityoftheparkfrombothBloorStreetandSpadinaRoadcanbeenhancedthroughsuchfeaturesasapedestrianmid-blockroute,colonnadeand/orwidenedsidewalk.ThedesignofanybuildingfacingEcologyParkshouldcreateafacadeoverlookingtheopenspace,byincludingfeaturessuchaswindowsorunitsaccessiblefromgradelevel.Thereshouldnotbeblankwalls,garbageareasorloadingdocksfacingthepark.
OpportunitiestoincorporatetheTTClandsintoanoveralldevelopmentschemeforthenortheastcornerareencouraged.Thiswouldallowforpossibilitiestoprovideavisuallyprominenttransitentranceintegratedintothebuiltform,andanenhancedpedestrianlinkageorparkconnectionbetweenEcologyParkandSpadinaRoad.
southwest corner
TheMilesNadalJewishCommunityCentreanchorsthesouthwestcorneroftheintersectionandisnotlikelytoberedevelopedintheshortterm.WestoftheCentre,anyredevelopmentoftheMetrosupermarketlands,includingitssurfaceparkinglot,shouldbelowerinheightthanattheintersection,providingadownwardtransitionfromtheheightpeaktotheNeighbourhoodtothesouth.ThefrontwallofthebuildingshouldbesignificantlysetbackfromBloorStreettoprovideasightlinetothespireofTrinitySt.Paul’sChurchandtofacilitatethefuturecreationofapublicsquare.
Toensureacomprehensiveandcohesivetreatmentofthesouthwestblockandsitecirculation,theselandsshouldbeplannedanddesignedtogetherwiththetwoadjacentlotstotheeast.Thiswouldprovidetheopportunitytoimproveandwidenthenorth-southlanewayforsharedaccessthroughtheblock,includingtheprovisionofhigh-qualitypavingtreatmentsandbuildingfenestrationoverlookingthelane.
Figure 7: Potential built form massing at Northeast Corner: view westward from Madison Avenue
North side of Bloor Street east of Spadina
Miles Nadal JCC
View of Metro supermarket lands and adjacent lots
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 20092�
DRAFt
southeast corner
Atthesoutheastcorner,MattCohenParkshouldberetainedandenhancedasaneighbourhoodfocalpoint.AnyredevelopmentoftheUniversityofTorontoSchool(UTS)siteshouldbeconsistentwithUniversityofTorontoSecondaryPlanpoliciesandguidelines.NewdevelopmentshouldmaintainthehistoricBloorStreetfaçadeoftheUTSbuilding,withnewbuiltformelementssteppingbackfromthestreetasreflectedinthecurrentzoningenvelopeforthesite.Redevelopmentofthebuildingshouldprovideactiveat-gradeuses,aswellaslandscapingtreatmentsandstreettreeplantingalongtheBloorStreetandHuronStreetfrontages.Similarly,activeat-gradeusesfacingMattCohenParkwouldhelptoanimatethepublicopenspace.
FurtherwestwithintheSpadinaNodearethelandslocatedatthecornersofBloorStreetWestatWalmerRoad.Shouldthesesitesberedeveloped,theyshouldbedesignedwithsufficientsetbackstocreateapublicplazafocusedonTrinitySt.Paul’sChurch.Incentivessuchasthepermissionofadditionalgrossfloorareainthepodium,integrationoftheTTCWalmerRoadautomatedentrance,andstreetwallheightuptosevenstoriesmaybeusedtofacilitatethecreationoftheplaza.Newbuildingsatthisintersectionshouldaccommodateactive,grade-relatedusessurroundingtheplaza,andshouldbedesignedwithlandmarkarchitecturalelementstoterminatetheviewnorthwardfromRobertStreet.
Matt Cohen Park - looking south from Bloor
UTS building at Southeast Corner
Rear view of Metro supermarket and adjacent properties from Robert Street Playing Field
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 22
DRAFt
Potential redevelopment of Spadina Node: view east toward SpadinaNorth side of Bloor between Walmer Road and Spadina Road today
Potential streetscaping at Bloor/Robert/Walmer intersectionView north toward Bloor Street from Robert Street today
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 20092�
DRAFt
University of Toronto Schools
4.1.4 unIversIty of toronto sItes
TheBloorCorridorUrbanDesignGuidelinesrecognizethecurrentbuildingenvelopesassetoutintheUniversityofToronto(U.ofT.)SecondaryPlanandSiteSpecificDevelopmentGuidelines.TheUniversityisundertakingaseparatesecondaryplanreviewwhichincludestheirpropertieswithintheBloorCorridor.WithrespecttoU.ofT.lands,theseguidelinesshallbeinterpretedinconjunctionwithapplicableplanningguidelinesandpoliciesspecifictotheSt.Georgecampus.
Ingeneral,Universitybuildingsshouldcontributetoananimatedstreetscape.BuildingsfrontingontoBloorStreetorpublicopenspacesshouldincludeactiveat-gradeusesthatareaccessibletothepublic,forexample,retail,andrestaurantuses.Heritageelementsshouldbepreserved,maintainedandenhancedwhereverpossible.
University of Toronto gateway at St. George Street
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 2�
DRAFt
4.1.5 maIn street precInct
TheBloorCorridor’sprimarycommercialshoppingareaisfoundintheMainStreetPrecinctbetweenBathurstStreetandWalmerRoad.Thisdistrictischaracterizedbyattached,low-risebuildingswithnarrowfrontagesatthestreetedge.Typicallythesebuildingshouseretailusesatgradewhichservethesurroundingneighbourhoods,andofficeandresidentialusesabove.Newdevelopmentsthatarecompatiblewiththeexistingformanduseinthisareaareencouraged.BetweenLippincottStreetandWalmerRoadtheexisting16metre(5storey)zoningenvelopeshouldgenerallybemaintained.
NewdevelopmentintheMainStreetPrecinctmayalsohelptofacilitatecertainpublicrealmimprovementstoexpandthe"BloorStreetGreenNecklace"openspacenetwork.Inparticular,theVisioningStudyhasidentifiedtwoopportunitiestocreateadditionalpublicspaceintheneighbourhood:
■ OntheexistingCity-ownedparkinglotsouthofBloorStreet,betweenLippincottandBordenStreets,fortheestablishmentofanewpark(seeFigure8);and
■ AttheintersectionofBloorStreetwithWalmerRoadandRobertStreets,tocreateanewplazafocusedaroundTrinitySt.Paul’sChurch(seeFigure9).
Wheredevelopmentmayfacilitatesuchpublicrealmimprovements,additionalheightupto7storeysmaybecontemplated,subjecttoappropriateangularplanerestrictionsandotherurbandesignconsiderations.
Retail-commercial area
Boulevard cafe on Albany Avenue
Brunswick Avenue south of Bloor
View east from Dalton Road
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 20092�
DRAFt
4.1.6 bathurst node
AsnotedinSection2.1,theseguidelinesapplytothePhaseIlandsoftheBloorCorridor,betweenAvenueRoadandBathurstStreet.ItisanticipatedthatthePhase2landsbetweenBathurstStreetandChristie/GraceStreetswillbethesubjectofafuturestudy.TheBathurstNode,therefore,providesanimportanttransitionandconnectionbetweenthePhaseIandPhase2lands,andshouldbeexaminedinfurtherdetailinthecontextofthatstudy.
AttheintersectionofBloorandBathurstStreets,aswellastheTTC’sBloor-DanforthsubwaylineandtheBathurststreetcarandbuslines,theBathurstNodeisanotherlocationthatmayappropriatelyaccommodateintensification.
Newdevelopmentshouldbedesignedwithabuiltformthatintegrateswiththelocal,mainstreetcharacteratstreetlevel.BuildingsintheBathurstNodeshouldincorporatealow-risepodiumconsistentwiththestreetwalloftheMainStreetPrecinct,withsimilarfine-grainedusesandcharacteristics,toprovideacontinuouspedestrianexperienceaswellasappropriatetransitiontotallerbuiltformelements.
South side of Bloor Street looking east from Bathurst Street
Honest Ed's retail store
Northwest corner of Bloor and Bathurst Streets
Figure 8: Potential open space between Lippincott and Borden Streets
Figure 9: Potential long-term vision for Trinity-St. Paul's Square
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 2�
DRAFt
4.2 publIc realm frameworkThePublicRealmFrameworkfortheseguidelinesprovidesdirectionsforincreasingpedestriansafetyandamenityinthecorridorandredistributingpedestrianactivitytoanimateeveryspace.TheFrameworkalsogivesanindicationofwheretoinvestinpublicspacefacilities.Itrequirespartnershipsforthedevelopmentofnewpubliclyaccessibleplazasonprivatepropertieswhichcouldcontributetoanover-archingvisionofpedestrianismalongtheBloorCorridor.Thisframeworkissupportedbytheothersectionsoftheseguidelines,whichprovidegeneralandsite-specificrecommendationsonhowtocreateandtransformpublicspaces.
4.2.1 open space network
TheBloorCorridorUrbanDesignGuidelinesidentifyarangeofopportunitiestoimproveandexpandthepublicnetworkofparks,openspaces,pedestrianlinks,forecourts,courtyards,andthequalityofthepedestrianenvironmentalongtheexistingroadnetwork(Figure10).Anopenspacesystemreferredtohereasthe"BloorStreetGreenNecklaceSystem"canbeachievedbystringingtogetherasequenceofplazas,forecourtsandseatingareaswithacompatiblelandscapedsidewalksystemalongthesouthsideofBloorStreet.Acontinuouspedestriancircuitshouldbeimplementedthroughoutthecorridorwithway-
Figure 10: Open Space Network
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
CR
OF
T
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
AL
BA
NY
AV
EN
UE
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
TB
AT
HU
RS
T
ST
RE
ET
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
LA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WA
LME
RR
OA
D
Public Park
Other Open Space
Potential Open Space Opportunity
Courtyards, Forecourts & Squares
Green or Enhanced Landscape
Promenade
Mid-block Pedestrian Connection
Signalized Intersection
Opportunities to improve the public realm
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 20092�
DRAFt
Passive seating area on a sidestreet
Potential sidewalk widening on north side of Bloor Street
"Green Finger" opportunity on sidestreet south of Bloor
findingelementssuchaspublicart,signageand/oraunifiedlandscapingtreatment.
Keyinitiativesinclude:
■ Enhancingexistingparksandopenspaces;
■ Establishingnewandenhancingexistingmid-blockconnectionstofacilitatepedestrianmovementthroughoutthecorridor,asshowninFigure10,especiallywheretheylinkwithparksandopenspaces;
■ Seekingopportunitiestocreateandenhance“greenfingers”ontheboulevardsofsidestreetsextendingnorthandsouthfromBloor,throughtheprovisionofstreettreeplanting,landscaping,andstreetfurniture;
■ Encouragingthecontributionofapubliclyaccessibleopenspaceatgradeleveltothepublicrealmineachsignificantnewdevelopment;
■ Enhancingstreetscapingthroughoutthecorridor,andproviding‘promenade’treatmentswithadoublerowoftreeswherespacepermitsandasopportunitiesarise;and
■ PromotingtheestablishmentofnewpublicspacesasdetailedinSection4.2.2below.
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 2�
DRAFt
4.2.2 publIc spaces
ThevisionfortheBloorCorridorincludesthepursuitofopportunitiestocreatearangeofnewcivicspacesincertainlocations:
museum plaza
TemporaryplantersandbarricadetreatmentsmaybeappliedacrosstheroadwayadjacenttotheRoyalOntarioMuseumfrontageonBloorStreetsuchthatitcouldbeusedasprogrammablespaceforoutdoorevents.Ontheseoccasions,thispartofthecorridorwouldbeclosedtovehicles.Furthermore,toincreasepedestriansafety,amid-blockpedestriancrosswalkmaybeconsideredtoconnectPhilosopher’sWalkandtheMuseumPlazatothenorthsideofBloorStreet.
varsity stadium plaza
OpportunitiesexisttoenhancethestreetscapeandsidewalksinfrontofVarsityStadium.ThesetreatmentsmaybedesignedinasimilarmannertotheMuseumPlazatohelpstrengthentheconceptofasequenceofopenspaces.
trinity st. paul’s square
TrinitySt.Paul’sChurchisanexistinglandmarkthatistreasuredbylocalresidents.ItcouldberecognizedasanewfocusandgatheringplacefortheneighbourhoodthroughthecreationofapublicspaceattheterminusofWalmerRoad.Attimes,thestreetcouldbeclosedtoaccommodatelocalfestivalsinthisspace.ThiswillreinforcetheprominenceoflocalheritageintheneighbourhoodandcelebrateTrinitySt.Paul’sChurchasaneighbourhoodlandmark.Thenewsquarewouldalsofunctionasa‘threshold’markbetweenthe‘mainstreet’characterareafoundwestofWalmerRoadandthemixedcharactertotheeastofWalmerRoad.
Thesquareshouldbebuiltinaphasedmanner,asredevelopmentpermits.Astherearebuildingsthatcurrentlyexistonthenortheastandnorthwestcornersofthisintersection,theremaystillbeopportunitiestodistinguishtheintersectionintheshorttermthroughaunifiedstreetscapingapproachincludingcommonlandscaping,seatingareas,etc(Figure11).Acomprehensivedevelopmentplan,orconsolidationofthepropertiespriortoamasterplanningprocess,isnecessarytorealizethelong-termrecommendation.
Museum Plaza as a temporary public gathering space
Varsity Stadium
Potential enhancement of Varsity Stadium streetscape treatment
Figure 11: Potential interim plaza treatment for Bloor/Walmer/ Robert intersection
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 200929
DRAFt
lippincott park
TheexistingCity-ownedparkinglotsouthofBloorStreet,betweenLippincottandBordenStreets,representsanopportunitytoseekpublic-privatepartnershipsforthepurposeofcreatingalandscapedparkatthatlocationwithnewdevelopmentfacingit.Moderateadditionalheightanddensityforthisdevelopmentmaybeconsideredtoprovidetheincentivetocreateparkamenitiesonthesite.
“xpr” x-pand public realm
Throughoutthestudyarea,opportunitiesmayexisttoexpandthepublicrealmthroughthedevelopmentreview/planningprocess.Inthelastdecadealone,wellover1.2millionsquarefeethasbeenaddedtothepublicrealmofthedowntownonlandsthatwerepreviouslynotownedbythecity.Thesespacestaketheformofparks,plaza’s,pedestrianconnections,parkettesandpubliclyaccessiblecourtyards.ThecourtyardatOneBedfordisanexampleofapubliclyaccessiblespacethatwascreatedthroughtheplanningprocess.Thespacewillincorporatearestoredheritagefacadeandfeatureacaféwithoutdoorseating.
Public realm considerations in design of One Bedford Road development
Courtyard at One Bedford Road development
City-owned parking lot between Lippincott and Borden Streets
Vision for a park between Lippincott and Borden Streets
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �0
DRAFt
4.2.3 streetscapes
BloorStreetshouldbeexaminedtoexploreoptionsforimprovingthepedestrianrealmandcommunity-widepedestrianlinkages.Thismayalsoentailtheremoval,subjecttoappropriatereviewandassessment,ofatrafficlanefromSpadinaAvenuethroughtoBathurstStreet.SidewalksalongBloorStreetatSpadinaRoadandBedfordRoadcouldthenbewidenedwheretheyarecurrentlytoonarrowforexistingpedestriandemand.Theremayalsobelimitedopportunitiestodesignintegratedlay-bysfordrop-offsanddelivery,pullingthemoffBloorStreetthroughlanes.Streetscapescanalsobeenhancedbyinvestigatingwaystoconsolidatesignage,utilitiesetctoeliminate‘double-poling’inthepublicright-of-way.Inadditiontoenhancedlandscapingandstreetfurnitureplacement,creativesolutionstostreettreeplantingwillberequiredtoenhancethestreetscapeandpedestriancomfort.
Potential sidewalk widening
Sidewalks in the Main Street Precinct today
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
4.3 Gateways, vIews and termInus sItesTheseUrbanDesignGuidelinesidentifypotentialandexistingGatewayAreasthatareofcity-wideimportanceorrelatedtoeachoftheprecincts.Figures12and13illustratediagrammaticexamplesofgatewayandterminussiteswithintheBloorCorridorthatwarrantspecialdesigntreatmentbecauseoftheirlocationandvisibility.Thesesites,andtheviewstowardthem,haveatremendouspotentialtostrengthenanarea’sidentityandimprovethequalityofthepublicrealm.
GatewayAreasrepresentsignificantopportunitiestomarkentryintotheBloorCorridorarea,aswellasspecificprecinctssuchastheMainStreetPrecinctorInstitutionalPrecinct.GatewayAreascanbeexpressedthroughacombinationoflandmarks,buildingmass,landscaping,signage(excludingadvertising),upgradedsidewalktreatments,speciallighting,gatheringareas(wherepossible),seatingandpublicart.Thescaleandcharacterofthegatewaytreatmentshouldbeinkeepingwiththecontextoftheareawhichitisintroducing.SpecificsitesencouragedforgatewaytreatmentareidentifiedinFigure12.
Figure 12: Gateway Areas
Bloor-Bathurst gateway area
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
CR
OF
T
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
AL
BA
NY
AV
EN
UE
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
TB
AT
HU
RS
T
ST
RE
ET
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
LA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WA
LME
RR
OA
D
G
g
Primary Gateway Site
Secondary Gateway Site
G
G
G
G G G
G
g g
g g
View north to Bloor from Spadina Avenue
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �2
DRAFt
AnincreasedsenseoforientationandgreaterlegibilityofthedifferentnodesandprecinctsoftheBloorCorridorcanbeachievedbyreinforcingkeyviewcorridorsandbyprovidinglandmarkfeaturesathighlyvisiblelocations.Viewsthroughandtosignificantsitescanalsoassistinencouraginganddirectinggreaterpedestrianmovementinallareas.Figure13identifiessignificantviewsthatshouldbeprotectedandreinforced,aswellaslocationswherevisualterminustreatments(buildingentries,structuralelements,banners,publicart)shouldbelocated.
Terminussitesarethefocalpointofaviewcorridorandhavestrategiclocationsforpublicorcommercialuses.Theyalsoofferanopportunitytocreatevisualinterestfromgreaterdistancesandifdesignedwithdistinction,canactaseffectiveorientingdeviceswherepeoplecangaugetheirrelativelocationinthedistrictorcity.Terminustreatmentscanincludearchitecturalelements,monumentsandartinstallations.Terminustreatmentsitesshouldnot,however,beconsideredthesingularjustificationforadditionalheight.
Atthesestrategiclocations,theprogrammingofthebuilding,thetreatmentofthearchitecture,materialsandbuiltformshouldreinforceitslocationasagateway,visualterminus,node,orcombinationthereof.Toenhancethedistinctionand
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
AL
BA
NY
AV
EN
UE
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
TB
AT
HU
RS
T
ST
RE
ET
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
LA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
CR
OF
T
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WA
LME
RR
OA
D
BLOOR STREET WEST
Views
Potential Views
Major Visual Terminus Building Treatment
Local Visual Terminus Building Treatment
Existing Landmark Buildingor Structure
T
t
T
T
t
t
t t t
t t
Figure 13: Views and Key Sites
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
Gateway Area: Bloor-Bedford intersection
Terminus Site: Trinity-St. Paul's Church spire
Terminus Site: Varsity Stadium
landmarkqualityofnewbuildingsonprominentcornersorvisualterminussites,modestexceptionstostep-backsandheightrestrictionsmaybepermittedtoencouragemassinganddesignsthataccentuatethevisualprominenceofthesite;forexample,architecturaltreatmentscanincludetallslenderelementssuchasspiresandturrets.Newdevelopmentsonterminussitesshouldaligndesignfeaturestotheviewaxis,includingentriesorporticoopenings.Onallcornersitesdevelopmentshouldbeorientedtobothstreetfrontages.
Asnewdevelopmentsatgatewayandterminussitescanshapetheimageandcharacterofanarea,theyshouldhavegreatercivicobligationstoensurethatthehighestpossiblestandardsindesignandmaterialqualityaremet.
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
4.4 herItaGePreservationandenhancementofbuiltandnaturalheritageisvitaltotheidentityoftheBloorCorridor.
Figure14illustratesthepropertieslistedontheCity'sInventoryofHeritageProperties,ordesignatedundertheOntarioHeritageAct,todate.Additionalpropertiesand/orheritageelementsmaybeaddedinthefuture.
Thesebuildingsaretobeprotectedandenhancedandadjacentdevelopmentsshouldcomplementandfeaturethesehistoricstructures.Whileheritagebuildingscanbeincorporatedwithinnewdevelopments,wherepossible,theintegrityoftheentireoriginalstructureshouldbemaintainedandrestored.
Heritageandlandmarkbuildingsshouldbecelebratedinthestreetscapewhereverpossible,throughstrategiesthatmayinclude:
■ providingapublicspaceinfront,suchasaplazaorseatingarea;
■ settingbackadjacentbuildingstoprovideadirectviewofheritagebuildings;
■ designingadjacentbuildingstorespondtothemassing,articulationandmaterialoftheheritagebuilding;and
■ ensuringredevelopmentofheritagebuildingspreservestheheritagecharacterofthebuilding,throughrestorationofheritageelementsandcarefuldesignofnewelements.
Medical Arts Building
York Club
University of Toronto Admissions Building
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
Figure 14: Map of Listed and Designated Heritage Buildings
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
ST
GE
OR
GE
ST
RE
ET
MA
JOR
ST
RE
ET
RO
BE
RT
ST
RE
ET
HU
RO
N S
TR
EE
TH
UR
ON
ST
RE
ET
SP
AD
INA
RO
AD
SP
AD
INA
AV
EN
UE
BR
UN
SW
ICK
AV
EN
UE
BO
RD
EN
ST
RE
ET
CR
OF
T
HO
WL
AN
D A
VE
NU
E
BR
UN
SW
ICK
A
VE
NU
E
MA
DIS
ON
AV
EN
UE
AL
BA
NY
AV
EN
UE
DA
LTO
N R
OA
D
LIP
PIN
CO
TT
ST
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
TR
EE
TB
AT
HU
RS
T
ST
RE
ET
AV
EN
UE
RO
AD
BE
DF
OR
D R
OA
D
LOWTHER AVENUE
PRINCE ARTHUR AVENUE
HOSKIN AVENUE
QU
EE
NS
PA
RK
DE
VO
NS
HIR
E P
LA
CE
SUSSEX AVENUE
SU
SS
EX
ME
WS
GLEN MORRIS STREET
HARBORD STREET
LENNOX STREETWASHINGTON AVENUE
BLOOR STREET WEST
WA
LME
RR
OA
D East Annex HCD
Harbord Village HCDPhase 2
Madison Avenue HCD
Listed Heritage Buildings
Designated Heritage Buildings
Facade Relocation & Restoration
Heritage Conservation Districts in Neighbourhood Impact Area:
Existing Under Study
Bloor Street United Church detail
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
4.5 publIc art proGramPublicartwillplayasignificantroleinreinforcingtheurbandesignguidelinesforthepublicrealmintheBloorCorridor.Opportunitiesforpublicartcanrangefromtheintegrationofideasintostreetscape,openspaceandbuiltformdesignstothecreationofindependentsculptures.Gatewaysandvisualcorridorterminationsshouldbecomeprominentpublicartsites.
ItisanticipatedthattheCity’sPrivateDeveloperPercentforPublicArtProgramwillbeamajorcontributortotheimprovementofpubliclyaccessibleareas,bothonprivateandpubliclands.PublicartpoliciesandguidelinesarereferencedintheCity’sUrbanDesignHandbook.
Gwendolyn MacEwen Park
Public art detail in Matt Cohen Park
Matt Cohen Park
Forecourt of Senator Croll Apartments
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
4.6 supportInG actIve transportatIon
walking
AlternativesforaddressingthesidewalkwidthonthesouthsideofBloorStreet,westofSpadina,shouldbeexamined.Thismayneedtobecompletedifandwhenredevelopmentoccursadjacenttothislocation.Theprovisionofstreetfurnitureshouldbeconsolidatedasneededandlocatedtomaximizepedestriancapacity.
cycling
ThecyclingnetworkinthestudyareaisconsistentwiththeCityofToronto’s2001BikePlan.Theexistingzoningrequiresprovisionofbikestorage,changerooms,andshowersinalllargescaledevelopments.TocomplementtheongoingeffortsoftheCityofTorontoinimplementingtheBikePlan,thisrequirementshouldbeaugmentedwithprovisionsfordedicatedbikestorageinparkinglotsandgaragesinnewdevelopmentsorrenovations.Theremayalsoexistopportunitiesforconsolidatedbikeparkingareasonsidestreetswherepedestriandemandsarelower,orwherethepublicrealmoraredevelopmentallows(forexample,inthepublicboulevardsatthesoutheastcornerofBrunswickStreetorthesoutheastcornerofRobertStreet).
AtitsmeetingofOctober23and23,2007,CityCouncildirectedstafftoreportonthefeasibilityofestablishingabikewayonBloorStreetWestandDanforthAvenue.IfadoptedbyCouncil,abikewayonBloorStreetshouldworkinharmonywiththepotentialsidewalkwideninginitiativesidentifiedinthisstudy.
transit
Thedevelopmentofnewbuildingsadjacenttotransitentrances,oroftheentrancesthemselves,offertheopportunitytointegrateand/orenhancepedestrianaccessto,andvisualprominenceof,thesubwaystations.Inparticular,theBedfordRoadentrancetotheSt.GeorgeStationisimportantasa“gateway”totheRoyalOntarioMuseum,VarsityStadiumandArena,andtheRoyalConservatoryofMusic.OpportunitiestowidenthesidewalksonBedfordRoadsouthofthesubwayentranceshouldbeexplored.PavementtreatmentsextendingacrossBloorStreetcangiveaddedprominencetothepedestrianmovementsattheselocations.
Providing cycling infrastructure
Supporting pedestrian movement
Accessibility of public transit
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
5. General buIlt form GuIdelInes
Urbandesignfortheareashouldconsiderthecomfortandconvenienceofthepedestrianasshapedbythestreetscapeanditsinterfacewiththebuiltform.Inthisregard,builtformelementssuchasheight,mass,setbacks,parkingandservicing,access,sunpenetrationandvisualconditionatthestreetarecrucialtothepedestrianexperienceandcontributetotheuniquecharacteristicsoftheBloorCorridor.
Figure 15: Schematic massing study for the Bloor Corridor
Low-rise street wall in the Main Street Precinct
Thefollowingguidelinesproposeahierarchyofbuiltformstandardsthatcorrespondtothreescales:thePedestrianScale,theStreetWallScaleandtheUrbanScale.Theseconsiderationsarederivedfromthefollowingprimaryconcerns:
■ Maintainingandenhancingthevitalityofthepedestrianenvironment.
■ Maintainingthepedestrian-scaledstreetwallwhereitexists.
■ Differentiatinglow-riseresidentialandmixed-usefromneighbouringhigher-risedevelopment.
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009�9
DRAFt
5.1 pedestrIan scale desIGn consIderatIonsThepedestrianscaleisprimarilyconcernedwithabuilding’sinterfacewiththesidewalk,protectionfromtheelementsandcreatingvisualinterest.Theseelementsaffecthowthebuiltformsupportsthecomfortofthepedestrianandhowitanimatesthepublicrealm.Creatingacomfortablepedestrianrealmencourageswalkingasacleanairalternative,contributingtosustainabledevelopment.
5.1.2 Interface wIth the sIdewalk
Inpredominantlycommercialareas-includingtheMainStreetPrecinct,SpadinaandBathurstNodesandthenorthsideofBloorintheInstitutionalPrecinct–awningsandcanopiesforweatherprotection,aswellastransparentwindowtreatments,providecomfortandinterestforthepedestrian.Narrowerretailfrontagesaredesirableforthesestripsandsignageshouldbeappropriatelyscaledtothepedestrian.
Throughoutthecorridor,apositivepedestrianexperiencewillrelyontheeffectivenessofthestreetscapingtreatment.Thebuiltformshouldincorporatelandscapingtreatmenttoenlivenotherwiseneutralbuildingedges.
5.1.3 parkInG and loadInG
Parkingandloadingareasshouldbeplacedbelowgradewherepossible.Ingeneral,loadingandparkingareasshouldbehiddenfromview,andlocatedonroadswiththeleastamountofpedestriantraffic.Accesstoparkingandloadingareasshouldnotbelocatedatgatewaysites,orattheterminusofaviewcorridorunlesstheyareincorporatedintothedesigntreatment.
5.1.4 mId-block connectIons
Mid-blockconnectionsandwalkwayscontributetotheeaseandaccessibilityofpedestrianmovementandshouldbeenhancedandencouragedwhereopportunitiesarise.TheseUrbanDesignGuidelines,aswellasarea-specificpoliciesintheOfficialPlan,identifyanumberofpotentialextensionstothepedestriannetwork,withoutprecludingadditionaloralternativelocations.Theprovisionofpubliclyaccessible,privatelydevelopedandownedopenspacesishighlyencouragedonindividualsitesthroughouttheBloorCorridor.
Pedestrian walkway design
Mid-bock connection
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �0
DRAFt
5.1.5 safety
Safetyinparksandoff-streetpedestrianpathsshouldbeincreasedwithappropriatepavingtreatments,lightingsystems,andlandscaping.Pedestriancrosswalksshouldbeclearlydefinedthroughpavementtreatments,markings,signallingandclearsignage.
5.2 street wall scale desIGn consIderatIonsThestreetwallscaleistheportionofthepublicrealmthatdefinesandformstheedgestothestreet.Thescaleandcharacterofthestreetwallhasafundamentalimpactonthepedestrianexperience.
5.2.1 street wall
Thestreetwallistheportionofthebuildingthatfrontsthestreetandwhichhasthegreatestimpactontheimageofthestreet.Ingeneral,thestreetwallofanewbuildingshouldalignwiththoseoftheneighbouringbuildingsorhavethesamesetbackasthepredominantbuildingsontheblock.Insomeinstances,thestreetwallalignmentmaybecompromisedinordertoachieveawider,landscapedsidewalk,aswouldbepreferredwithintheInstitutionalPrecinct,forexample.
Itiscriticalthatthestreetwallhasthehighestqualityofarchitecturaldesignandmaterials,especiallyatthegroundandsecondfloors,asthisportionofthebuildingisthemostvisibleandaccessibletopedestrians.Tothisend,1:50scaleelevationdetails(withmaterialslabelled)willberequiredwithnewdevelopmentapplicationsinordertosecurethequalityofmaterialsandarchitecturaldetailsadjacenttothepublicrealm.Itisatthestreetwallthatthequalityofthepublicrealmcanbemostenhanced.
ThestreetwallthroughouttheBloorCorridorshouldbedesignedtoensurepedestriancomfortandadequatelightpenetration,throughconsiderationofthefollowing:
■ BuildingsfacingBloorStreetshouldhaveactiveusesat-gradewithaminimum75%glazing,providedthatminimumenergyperformancetargetsaremet,toachievemaximumvisualtransparencyandanimation.Weatherprotectionforpedestriansisencouragedthroughtheuseofawningsandcanopies;
City of Toronto's 1:50 elevation requirements
Main Street Precinct street wall
Mid-rise street wall emerging in the Institutional Precinct
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
■ Podiumorstreetwallheightsshouldgenerallybe13-16metresor4-5storeysintheMainStreetPrecinctandSpadinaNodewestofMadisonAvenue;
■ Podiumorstreetwallheightsshouldgenerallybe19-25metresor6-8storeysintheInstitutionalPrecinct,eastofMadisonAvenue;
■ Thestreetwallshouldcontributetothe‘fine-grain’characterofthestreetscapebyarticulatingthefaçadeinaverticalrhythmthatisconsistentwiththeprevailingcharacterofnarrowbuildingsandstorefronts–generallyinintervalsbetween9and12metres;
■ At-graderetailshouldhaveaprominentpresenceonthestreetwithafloor-to-ceilingheightthatisnolessthan4.5metres;
■ Commercialsignageshouldadddiversityandinteresttoretailstreets,butnotbeoverwhelming;
■ Streetwallsshouldbedesignedwiththehighestpossiblematerialqualityanddetail;
■ Nosignificantblankat-gradestreetwallconditionsshouldbepermittedonanyfrontage;
■ Whilematerialsandarchitecturecanvarybetweenbuildings,itisgenerallydesirablethatthestreetwallheightbeaconsistentline.Above-gradesetbacksaregenerallyrecommendedtostrengthenthequalityofthepedestrianexperience.
Opportunities to fill gaps in the street wall
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 �2
DRAFt
5.2.2 buIldInG elements
Toencouragecontinuityinthestreetscapeandtoensurehorizontal‘breaks’inthefaçade,buildingsshouldbedesignedtoreinforcethefollowingkeyelementsthroughtheuseofsetbacks,articulation,texturesandmaterials:
■ Base–Withinthefirstthreetosixstoreys,abaseshouldbeclearlydefinedthatpositivelycontributestothequalityofthepedestrianenvironmentinthelevelofanimation,transparency,articulationandmaterialquality.
■ Middle–Thebodyofthebuildingabovethebaseshouldcontributetothephysicalandvisualqualityoftheoverallstreetscape.
■ Top-Theroofconditionshouldbedistinguishedfromtherestofthebuildinganddesignedtocontributetothevisualqualityoftheskylineofthenodes.
5.2.3 orIentatIon and placement
Ingeneral,buildingsshouldbeorientedtoandplacedatthestreetedgewithclearlydefinedprimaryentrypointsthatdirectlyaccessthesidewalk.BuildingsonthesouthsideofBloorStreet,eastofSpadinaAvenue,shouldbesetbacksubstantiallyfromtheright-of-waytofacilitatethepublicrealmvision.ThroughouttheBloorStreetCorridor,buildingsshouldbebuilttoreinforcetheexistingstreetwall.
5.2.4 parkInG and servIcInG
Whereverpossible,parkingfornewdevelopmentsshouldbeprovidedbelowgradeandaccessedbyarearlane.Redevelopmentsitesshouldplanforacontinuousrearlanenetworkwhereverpossible.
Above-gradeparkingstructuresshouldnotbeconsideredexceptaboveasubway,wherebelow-gradeparkingisnotpossible.WheretheyfrontontoBloorStreet,suchstructuresshouldbescreenedfromviewthroughintegrationofelementssuchasusesfacingthestreet,“greenwall”treatment,orpublicart.
Serviceareasincludingloadingdocks,garbageareasandgarageentrancesshouldbelocatedtotherearofadevelopmentandgenerallynotvisiblefromthestreet.Whereserviceareasarevisibleorpubliclyaccessible,theseentrancesshouldbedesignedtobeintegraltothefaçadeandanextensionofthepublicrealm,withhighqualitymaterialsanddetailing.
Loading and servicing should be more thoughtfully considered
Articulation of building elements - Institutional Precinct
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
5.3 urban scale desIGn consIderatIonsTheurbanscaledefinesthesegmentsofbuildingsperceivedfromgreaterdistances.Urbandesignconsiderationsareprimarilyconcernedwithissuesofmassingandheight.Theseissuesaffecthowabuildingfitsintoitssurroundings,howitisperceivedfromthestreetorfromadistance.Themassing,profileandheightoftheupperportionsofthebuildingshouldsatisfythefollowingdesigncriteria.
5.3.1 buIldInG heIGhts and transItIon
AsFigure16depicts,existingorapprovedbuildingheightsintheBloorCorridorgenerallyfollowalogicalpatternthathaspeaksatstrategicnodesandintersections(Bloor/Bedford,Bloor/Spadina,Bloor/Bathurst)whichtransitiondownwardtolowerheightsthatreflecttheestablishedbuiltformineachoftheInstitutionalPrecinctandtheMainStreetPrecinct.Thistransitionlessensboththephysicalandtheperceivedimpactofheightontheseareas.
Withinthecorridor,thetransitiondynamicreflectsitspositioninthegeneralcity-widepattern:higherandmoreintensetowardtheCitycentreintheeast,andlesssointhewest.AtWalmerRoad,thereisadistinctchangeinheightanddevelopmentintensity.ThefuturebuiltformalongBloorStreetshouldgenerallymaintainthispattern.
Anadditionalconsiderationistheestablishmentofdevelopmentnodes,atSt.George,SpadinaandpossiblyatBathurstStreet.Theirlocationsatsubwaystopsareidealforintensification,andareappropriatelocationsforhigherbuildings.Developmentshouldbedesignedtoprovideadequatetransitiontowardthesetallernodes.
Figure 16: General pattern of building heights
Higher building heights in the Institutional Precinct
Considering buildings within their broader urban context
Existing Buildings
On Bloor Behind Bloor
Proposed Buildings
On Bloor Behind Bloor
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
Eachbuildinginthecorridormustrelatetothesitessurroundingit,bothalongBloorStreet,andintheadjacentlow-riseNeighbourhoods.Inadditiontotheparametersgoverninglanduse,densityandheight,thesesite-to-sitetransitionsshouldinvolvethecarefulconsiderationofsite-andbuilding-specificdesigndetails,includingsiteplanning,buildingmassing,andmaterials,amongothers,toensurefitandconsistencywithinagivencontext.
GeneralandspecificguidelinescontainedinSection4aboveidentifywhere,onasitebysitebasis,transitionsshouldconsider:
■ intensityandlanduse;
■ overallbuildingheight,podiumheight,andmassing;
■ shadow,wind,andskyview;
■ horizontalrhythm;
■ at-gradeheights,cornicelines,fenestrationpatterns,andotherarchitecturalfeatures;
■ materialsandcolours;
■ pedestrianandvehicularaccessandcirculation;and
■ viewsandprominentlocations.
Transitionshouldalsobeafactorinthecomprehensivedesignofsites.Forexample,thereareanumberofpropertieswithintheOISEBlockthatshouldbeconsideredasawhole,inordertoplanappropriatetransitionsfortheblock.Eachsiteshouldbeplannedanddesignedinconcertwithadjacentsites,regardlessofownership.Towardsthisend,ownersshouldconsidercollaborating,whenpossible,tocreateblockorareaplans,sothattransitionscanbeconsideredmostmeaningfully.
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
TORONTOOctober 2009��
DRAFt
5.3.2 shadows and pedestrIan comfort
Residentialareasandthepublicrealmmustbeprotectedfromundueshadowingfromproposedbuildings.
Inordertominimizetheadverseimpactofproposedbuildingsontheneighbouringareas,applicantsofprojectswhichhaveaheightabovetheexistingcontextshouldprovidedrawingsshowingshadowscastbytheproposeddevelopmentonpubliclyaccessibleareasandonbuildingssurroundingit.
ShadowsshouldbeshownforMarch21andSeptember21forthehoursof9:18am,10:18am,11:18am,12:18pm,3:18pm,4:18pm,5:18pmand6:18pm.Shadowdrawingsaretobeprovidedearlyinthedevelopmentreviewprocess.Shadowstudiesatadditionaltimesmayalsoberequired,forexampleinJunewhenthesunshineswellintotheevening.Shadowstudiesforadditionaltimesmayberequiredwhenwarranted.
Modelling shadow impact of existing and potential development
Shadow-sensitive areas include parks and open spaces
URBANDESIGNGUIDELINESTORONTO
BLooRcoRRIDoRvISIoNINGStUDy:AvENUERoADtoBAtHURStStREEt
October 2009 ��
DRAFt
5.4 sustaInable desIGnDevelopmentintheBloorCorridorshouldexhibitleadershipinenvironmentallysustainableplanninganddesignwithinanurbanizedsetting,withtheobjectivetoachievehigherstandardsforthedistrictasawhole.TheOfficialPlanpromotesandencouragessustainabledevelopment,andinDecember2008,CityCounciladoptedtherevisedTorontoGreenStandard(TGS).Minimumsustainabilityperformancemeasuresarerequiredforallnewdevelopmentgoingthroughtheplanningprocess.Inaddition,greenroofsarerequiredundertheGreenRoofBy-lawinnewdevelopmentforbuildingslargerthan2,000squaremetresstartingJanuary31,2010.
TheTGSisatwo–tieredsystemofperformancemeasuresthatareconcernedwiththeprotectionofairandwaterqualityandurbanforests,andthereductionofenergyuse,greenhousegases,wasteproduction,andlightpollution.Thereareseparatestandardsformid-tohigh-risedevelopment,low-riseresidentialdevelopmentandlow-risenon-residentialdevelopment.Tier1,whichrequiresmeetinganenergyefficiencytargetof25%betterthattheModelNationalEnergyCodeforBuildings(MNECB),isrequiredthroughtheplanningprocess.Tier2isdesignedtoachieveahigherlevelofenvironmentalperformance,includinganenergyefficiencytargetof40%betterthatMNECB.Itisachievedthroughincentivessuchasa20%developmentchargerefund.TheperformancemeasuresofTier2oftheTorontoGreenstandardwillbeencouragedforallnewdevelopmentintheBloorCorridor.
TheTorontoLEED(LeadershipinEnergyandEnvironmentalDesign)supplementwillbeavailableasoftheFall2009toassistdeveloperswhointendtopursuetheLEEDaccreditation,toensuretheyhaveaddressedtheCity’sTGS.DesignoptionstoimplementtheperformancemeasuresoftheTGScanbefoundin‘DesignGuidelinesforGreeningSurfaceParkingLots’andthe‘BirdFriendlyDevelopmentGuidelines’.
TheCityoffersincentivestoundertakeenergyefficiencymodelingthroughtheBetterBuildingsPartnershipforNewConstructionprogram,andfurtherincentivesfornewbuildingsthatachievereducedelectricityconsumption.TheEco-RoofIncentiveProgramoffersupto$50persquaremetreforinstallationofagreenroofand$2to$5persquaremetreforinstallationofacoolroofforindustrial,commercialandinstitutionalretrofits.
More information can be found at:
www.toronto.ca/greenroofs and www.toronto.ca/planning
Encouraging sustainable design