Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I
I ,,·
Evaluation Summary Score Sheet - Final Post Demo
Bid No: SP-19-0104
Description: Electronic Bidding Solution
Agency: Public Agencies as defined by Act 1075
-- , - .,
f.lrverag,edJW~ig11tectl1i~ctfoic-a1i ,\Zen1f orr 1N~me, 1 ~ -1 _!l?rro,pos·~1rsc_:or:e~ ____,J
Bonfire 373.33 Central Bidding 353.33
Cobblestone Software 278.33 Ion Wave Technologies, Inc. 433.33
LSI Consulting 256.67 MTX Group, Inc. 165.00
Periscope Holdings, Inc. 0.00 Sysoft 216.67
'.'~t~~~~OQ Date: 'T-z_y ·Jl cq
•
r , ,v.er~ve}'Wei~hte~ ."' · li>emonstcatiQrnSc.Pr.e, 1 [ iiotali.S'core.
460.00 833.33 280.00 633.33
NA 278.33 420.00 853.33
NA 256.67 NA 165.00 NA 0.00 NA 216.67
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire
Col.A Col. B Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Weighted I
Points from Possible Possible Raw Points
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1 I 3.831 51 770/o 50 38.33
E.2
E.3
E.4 116.00
E.5 I 4.17 5 830/o 100 83.33
E.6 I 3.33 5 670/o 100 66.67
Demonstration I 4.60 5 92% 500 460.00
TOTAL SCORE! 373.33!
SignaureC~ !l{o'J~ Printed Name: (:l\ VV'\ ½A' f 1\t\o(Y"\~ )SoV1
Date: , ['L-'-\ { l "J 1
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Koy for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire
0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Average of Raw Polntl for
Criteria CT I AY I OP JP LM MJ Category ~
EJ<p•rieneo (E. 1 Questions I - 3)
E.1 4 I 4 3 4 4 4 U3
Provious Projects (E.2 Question 1)
E.2 4 I 3 3 3 4 4 :uo
Lil;gation (Nor Scored) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Quest.ions 1 • 3)
E.4 4 I 4 I 3 I 4 I 4 I 4 I !.!! Securiry, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)
E.5 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 I 4 I 5 I ~
E .6 !Fee Slrucrure (E.6 Oucslioo I)
Demonstration
3
I 3
I 3
I 3
I 4
I 4
I U3
4 5 4 5 5 4.80
Prin5 ame < P!Vl M.
M~="d -"t ~ Aootge42 ¥c.~L) Le<; M c~~~h
Q,tlVV\ \?:€. r tb PIY'\)$()/1
Weighted Score Sheet
Col.A Col. 8
Averaged Raw Points from Consensus
Criteria Score Sheet
E.1 4.00
E.2
E.3
E.4 3.67
E.5 3.33
E.6 3.33
Demonstration 2.80
Signaure c~ J k~ Printed Name: Cecm be f Th QIY\r S'Ofl
Date: 1 }'l-'-1/t4
SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding
Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Raw Points Percentage of Weighted I
Possible Possible Raw Points (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
5 80% 50 40.00
5 73% 150 110.00
5 67% 100 66.67
5 67% 100 66.67
5 56% 500 280.00
TOTAL SCORE! 353.33!
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding
O = Unacceptab!e 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Exceaent
Criteria
Experience (E.1 Oueslions 1 ~ 3) E.1
Ptevloos Ptojects (E.2 OuesUon 1)
E.2
Li1Jgati0<1 (Not Soc<ed) (E.3 OueSliO<l I )
E.3
UndCI$landing and Approaeh to Requtrcments ce., OucsiJons 1 . 3)
E.4
Sccvritt, lmplemenia1ion, and Contracting (E.!t Oue$lions 1 - 3)
E.5
E.6 IFee Struduro (E.6 Ouestlon 1)
Otmonsuatlon
CT AV DP JP I LM
4 4 4 4 I 4
3 3 I 4
3 3
3 3 3
3 3 3
3 3
Printed Name fL A Q W bww4£ _IVL ~ {Y , ( .A cJ / C ._JO L,s D
~ \o tUL X '11,US i.~~ JJl6c<11~
Q~M\-:z{ c· ::rh(hNJ )$~ I
Aver1ge of R.aw Points for
I MJ I Calegory
--I 4 I ~
I 4 I_______Ml
4 3.17
3 3.33
3.33
2 2.IO
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.
O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marg:nal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Critoria
Experience(E .1 Q uestions 1 - 3)
E.1
Previous Projects (E,2 Question 1)
E.2
Litigation (Nol Scored) (E.3 Oue,1100 1)
E.3
Understanding and Appro.aeh co Rcqultemcnts (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)
E.4
Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 OuesUons t - 3)
E.5
E.6 !Fee SIIUdure (E.6 OueSllon 1)
Demon~tratlon
CT AV DP JP LM
4 4 4
4 4 5
4 5 5
4 4 4 4
4 4 5
4 4
PrintDm~Af e '~ M I ('ffi:c.d ( C -:Jt!-.J\.S' kl/\ I\ b e,y?.. Y 0 -f::u t0-s M c_oc<--<-tJ ~
Ca mb...ec To11me5C¥1
Average or Raw Points for
I MJ Category
-I 5 .!:.!!
I 5 I 4.33
4.IO
5 4.17
5 -~
5 ~
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contract Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.
Col.A Col. B
Averaged Raw Points from Consensus
Criteria Score Sheet
E.1 -E.2 -E.3
E.4 4.50
E.5 4.17
E.6 4.33
Demonstration 4.20
Signaure c~( j k rn-Vl--i Printed Name: ~Yv10:f ( TV't~QS'1/1
Date: 1 /?-Uc /I °l
Col.C
Raw Points Possible
(5 pts. per Question)
5
5
5
5
Col. D Col. E Col. F
Percentage of Weighted Possible Raw Points
Points Possible I Weighted Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
90% 150 136.00
83% 100 83.33
87% 100 86.67
84% 500 420.00
TOTAL SCOREI 433.331
Technical Evaluation Summary Score Sheet - Initial Consensus
Bid No: SP-19-0104
Description: Electronic Bidding Solution
Agency: Public Agencies as defined by Act 1075
Vendor Name, Aver~gedl Weig'ht~d l!echh'ical I - . - - ~ E!r-oposaI1, Score
Bonfire 373.33 Central Bidding 353.33
Cobblestone Software 278.33 Ion Wave Technologies, Inc. 433.33
LSI Consulting 256.67 MTX Group, Inc. 165.00
Periscope Holdings, Inc. 0.00 Sysoft 216.67
Signaure: (hA~ ~ Printed Name: J .pc~ Date: 7 ,ho / I g
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire
0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Aver.ago of R.aw Point, for
Criteria CT I AY I DP I JP I LM I MJ I category
--Experience (E. 1 Questions 1 • 3)
E.1
E.2 Previous Projects (E...2 Question 1)
4 I 4 I 3 I 4 I 4 I 4
I 3.13
4 I 3 I 3 I 3 I 4 I 4
U tigation (Not SGote<I) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 • 3)
E.4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3.13
Security, Implementation. atld Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)
E.5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4.17
E .6 I Fee Structure (E 6 Question 1) 3 3 3 3 4 4 3.33
r ted Name
u .M 12-e.r Tu0vnpscV1
b::;e~~ M,c~ 1-~ IY"'I
L c: s M <-G7°' "'st~
~~ k,Ld?- y e, f=e S
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Bonfire
Col. A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible' Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1
I 3.~31 51 77%1 501 38.33
E.2 ---·
-E.3
E.4 3.83 5 n% 150 115.00
E.5 4.17 5 83% 100 83.33
E.6 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67
TOTAL SCOREI 373.331
Signaure: l(ibW} 6\~ Printed Name: 0 A1c1/\\:H ( -\}\DQ'.::1\2.SC,<Vl Date:
1 /\ C)~~
Key for Assignment of Points: O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria CT AV DP
Experience (E.1 Oucsti0t1s 1 • 3) E.1 4
Previous Projects (E 2 Question 1) E.2
Litigation (Not Score<!) (E.3 Ouestlon 1)
E.3
Unclcrs.tancUng and Approaeh to Rcquitemcnts (E . .c Oueitlon.s 1 • 3) E.4 4
security. lmplcmentatlon. and Conuactlng (E.S Questions 1. 3)
E.5 3
E.6 !Fee Struauro (E 6 Question 1) 3 3
L~s .-Pl c.(!,o..,.,1J..
(A,.La t:e, Aw b eM'-- 1/6--h :S
JP
4
3
3
3
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding
LM
4
3
Or"\
MJ
3
4
Average of Rtw Point.s for Category
4.00
s.81
3.33
3.33
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104
Prospective Contractor Name: Central Bidding
Col. A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible' Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1 4.00 5 80%
E.2
E.3
E.4 3.67 5 73% 150 110.00
E.5 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67
E.6 3.33 5 67% 100 66.67
TOTAL SCORE! 353.33!
Signaure: C (J .4 QM d) I~ cY)
Printed Name: Gu VJ/) la-ec Tu om r?SOQ Date: 7 ) I O / l VJ
1
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Cobblestone Software
O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = G-Ood 5 = Excellent
Criteria
Experience (E. I Oue,llo"" t . 3)
E. 1
Ptevious Ptojeds (E.2 Oue:stion 1)
E.2
U!.lga1ion (Not SCOred) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach 10 Requiremcnls (E..4 QucsJion.s 1 . 3)
E.4
Security. Implementation, and Contracling (E.S Oues.t.ions 1 - 3)
E.5
E.6 !Fee Structure (c.6 Question 1)
CT AY DP JP LM
2 3 3 3
3 3 3 3
3 3 3 4
2
CU:~bfv TuOW105oY1
Ia!t7;~~ Les M <-(!,c,;,14yJ.,
.~b~ Ya. h&=
MJ
3
Average of Raw Point• tor Category
2.17
3.17
us
1.33
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104
Prospective Contractor Name: Cobblestone Software
Col.A Col. B
Averaged Raw Points from Consensus
Criteria Score Sheet
E.1 -E.2 -E.3
E.4 I 3.17
E.5 I 3.33
E.6 I 1.33
Signaure: ~ 6 ~ ,. w , v,~; Printed Name: Ca VJ()~( ·ru =;;; Date: 1 /1 D )15
I
Col. C
Raw Points Possible
(5 pts. per Question)
5
5
5
Col.D Col. E Col. F
Percentage of Possible Raw Weighted
Points Points Possible' Weighted Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
63% 150 95.00
67% 100 66.67
27% 100 26.67
TOTAL $COREi 278.331
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solution Prospective Contractor Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.
O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria
Ex~rience (E.1 Oucs.tions 1 • 3) E.1
PrevioU$ Projects (E,2 Question 1) E.2
Litlgalion (Not Scored) (E.3 OueSlloo I )
E.3
Unders.taodtng a.nd Appco.aeh to Requirements (E . .C OuMtions 1 • 3) E.4
5eour1ty, lmpltmentation, and Contraditlg (E.S Oueslions t . 3)
E.5
E.6 IF•• Structure (E.6 Ouesi;oo 1)
CT AY DP JP LM
4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 5
4 5 4 5
4 4
4
co~\?,-£ ( \VtoVM fscYl D~ !!_~ 1,3 \ V'"°~.
N,tA-cllc~ L -.J · i<s ,,u_~r: I ci.r-sGY'.
-? CJ'tj /1
,~ 'o1& y /! i:e:o_s
MJ
5
5
Average of Raw Points for C11egory
4.17
,uo
4.17
~ -
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contract Name: Ion Wave Technologies, Inc.
Col.A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of I I
Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1
I 4.171 51 83%.1 501 41.67
E.2 --
E.3
E.4 4.50 5 9()% 150 1·36~00
E.5 4.17 5 83% 100 83.33 -
E.6 I 4.33 5 87% 100 86.67
TOTAL SCORE! 433.33!
Signaure: C.cu;i QCM ~ k ~ Printed Name: Ct'J. ll]ll lQe V IVl C>/Yi psov1 Date: 7 /10 LI~
•
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points: O = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria
Experience (E.1 Queslions 1 - 3)
E.1 I
Previous Projects (E.2 Question 1)
E.2
Litigation (Not Scored) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)
E.4
Serurity, Implementation, and Contracting (E.S Questions 1 - 3)
E .S
E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1)
CT AY DP JP
2 3 2 3
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 3
Printed Name
ill Vn i'.'.2:-C( 1b:im p S ctYl .D @12A,1K. f MrttJi§
kR~wt H,s:ltdl~· L_~ ..Jc:, kAJ OA
L-t-<; µc.6au2.~
/:n'.Y) 6 V{L VA--t-t /1
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: LSI Consultin!
Average of Raw Points for
LM MJ Category
3 3 2.67
3 3 2.33
3 3 2.50
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104
Prospective Contractor Name: LSI Consulting
Col.A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of I I
Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1 2.67 5 ij3% 50 26.67
E.2 2.67 5 ij3% 100 63.33
E.3
E.4 2.67 5 53% 150 80.00
E.5 2.33 5 47% 100 46.67
E.6 I 2.50 5 50% 100 60.00
TOTAL SCORE! 256.67!
SignaureQeu,_ .QK cj /,1 ~Grl
Printed Name:~k:JU \v)oCQpsOVI Date: 7- /t O (19
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points: 0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria I CT I AY I OP I JP
Experience (E.1 Questions 1 - 3)
E.1 2 2 1 2
Previous Projects (E.2 Question 1)
E.2 2 2 1 2 - - - t·· ... I - - '
- . I '
Litigation (Not Scored) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)
E.4 2 2 1 2
Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 - 3)
E.5 2 2 1 2
E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1) 2 2 1 2
~Nam,
~ VyJ bLY lJ;1fyv1(25 cVl
Dfu/1/2-- A-L /)411:Mn },, l, ~ (/) ':t ' ,
fA.. ,ucllc.. L ·_JC)J...A..soC\ •
lc-s J/1, '--0-,t,0f; ~
~6vit2_ Ya ¼
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: MTX Group, In
Average of Raw Points for
I LM I MJ I Category
1 1 1.50
1 1 1.50 ; - . -
I I
1 2 1.67
2 2 1.83
2 1 1.67
Weighted Score Sheet
Col.A Col. B
Averaged Raw Points from Consensus
Criteria Score Sheet
E.1 1.50
E.2
E.3
E.4 1.67
E.5 1.83
E.6 1.67
Signaure C Cg ) C\, Q.,c..-<-::,_ 6 J/"\rfr-4)0 /)/1
Printed Name: Cav'\q[o~e C T}) O {Y)()S;O it::)
Date: 7/ LO [JCR
SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: MTX Group, Inc.
Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Raw Points Percentage of Possible Possible Raw Weighted
(5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
5 30% 50 16.00
5 33% 150 60.00
5 37% 100 36.67
5 33% 100 33.33
TOTAL SCORE! 165.00I
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points:
SP-19-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: Periscope Holding:
0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria I
Experience (E.1 Questions 1 • 3)
E.1 I
Previous Projects (E.2 Question 1)
E.2 I
Litigation (Not Scored) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approaeh to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 • 3)
E.4 I
Security, Implementation. and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 • 3)
E.5
E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1)
·HI
CT I AV I DP I JP
0 I 0 I 0 I 0
0 I 0 I 0 I 0
0 I 0 I 0 I 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Printed Name
Ca VY)\o_Qf TooYnp56n VM4rii f ,4,1.,,1J-rPl> ~ e-p~ .
[VJ f ti{~/ k-: l- Jo r::s<Y) Le:s µc~,~~A A-wJo ed?---- y"' te.. s
Average of Raw Points for
I LM I MJ I Category
I 0 I 0 I 0.00
I 0 I 0 I 0.00
I 0 I 0 I 0.00
0 0 0.00
0 0 o.oo
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Periscope Holdings, Inc.
Col. A Col. B Col. C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Weighted Points from Possible Possible Raw Points
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Possible I Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1 -E.2 -E.3
E.4 I 0.00 5 0% 150 0.00
E.5 I 0.00 5 0% 100 0.00
E.6 I. 0.00 5 0% 100 0.00
TOTAL SCORE! 0.001
s ;gnaure Ca ~ :D\a ~ Printed Name: C O ({\(] la-e_v::: To O(YJ os;:o I'") Date: 7 / l D ( ( CJ I
Consensus Score Sheet - Initial
Key for Assignment of Points: 0 = Unacceptable 1 = Poor 2 = Marginal 3 = Acceptable 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Criteria
Experience (E.1 Questions 1 - 3)
E.1 I
Previous Projects (E.2 Question 1)
E.2
Litigation (Not Scored) (E.3 Question 1)
E.3
Understanding and Approach to Requirements (E.4 Questions 1 - 3)
E.4
Security, Implementation, and Contracting (E.5 Questions 1 - 3)
E.5
E.6 Fee Structure (E.6 Question 1)
{LL~
CT AY DP JP
2 2 3 3
2 3 2 2
1 1 2 2
1 1 2 2
3 3 3 3
Printed Name
U'.J VYl be/ =1:}) oillp S;:,'Yl D llr2 llA-L e 4r2--t4ifJ +S
)vl- evcy !vtt-cAc_f/e, L, .....1oWoA
Lc:s ./4/l c;0-A'JJ..A
dM be&- Y Ah 5
SP-1 9-0104 Electronic Bidding Solutior Prospective Contractor Name: Sysoft
Average of Raw Points for
LM MJ Category
3 3 2.87
3
2 2 1.87
1 2 1.60
3 3 3.00
Weighted Score Sheet SP-19-0104 Prospective Contractor Name: Sysoft
Col.A Col. B Col.C Col. D Col. E Col. F
Averaged Raw Raw Points Percentage of Points from Possible Possible Raw Weighted
Criteria Consensus (5 pts. per Points Points Possible! Weighted Score Sheet Question) Received (Out of 700) Points Scored
E.1 -
E.2 -E.3 -- ' .
E.4 .. 1.67 5 .' ~3% 150 ·:•;60.00 · ...
E.5 1.50 5 30% 100 · 30.00 . ;·
E.6 3.00 5 60% 100 60.00
TOTAL $COREi 216.671
Signaure: ~ ~ /)
Printed Name: C¼m\'.2£ r :IbDCYJ'.DSOv'.)
Date: l / I O f IC/ I