Upload
pierce-burke
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
What We Will Cover Topic 1 Introduction To Process Control Topic 2 Introduction To Process Dynamics Topic 3 Plant Testing And Data Analysis Topic 5 Enhanced Regulatory Control Strategies Topic 6 Process Control Hardware Systems Topic 4 Controller Actions And Tuning Topic 7 Control Valves Topic 8 Process Control Troubleshooting
Citation preview
Topic 4
Controller Actions And Tuning
Chemical Processes
Self-regulating Integrating
Process Dynamics
SS Gain, Kp
Deadtime, θLag, τ
Process Dynamics
Gain, Kp,integrate
Deadtime, θ
In the last lecture
What We Will Cover
Topic 1
Introduction To Process Control
Topic 2
Introduction To Process Dynamics
Topic 3
Plant Testing And Data Analysis
Topic 5Enhanced
Regulatory Control Strategies
Topic 6
Process Control Hardware Systems
Topic 4
Controller Actions And Tuning
Topic 7
Control Valves
Topic 8
Process Control Troubleshooting
In This Lecture…
Controller Actions
Controller Modes
Proportional Control
Problems of Proportional-Only Control
Feedback Controller PID controller is the most common type
Sole purpose is to adjust an MV in order to bring a CV (PV) as close to SP in as short a time as possible
The extent at which the controller adjusts the MV depends on the PID tuning constants– Kc – Proportional Term
– τI – Integral Term (min)
– τD – Derivative Term (min)
Controller Modes Manual (MAN)
– Operator changes OP “manually”– SP not used for control
Auto (AUTO)– Operator changes SP– Controller adjusts OP “automatically” to bring PV to SP
Cascade (CAS)– Secondary controller on CAS and Primary controller on AUTO– Primary’s OP “cascaded” down to secondary’s SP– Secondary adjusts own OP to bring PV to SP
Consider this....
Fin fluctuates; SP fixed at 50% When level = 10%, we want valve full close (OP = 0%) When level = 90%, we want valve full open (OP = 100%) Level in between 10 and 90%, valve will be partially open This is an example of proportional-only control
Fin
LC
OP
SP = 50%
Essence Of P-Action
Take drastic action when far away from SP
Go easy when close to SP
OP = Kc x Error + Bias– Kc = controller gain– Error = SP - PV (depends on manufacturer)– Bias = some constant
Good? Yes, but….
An example
DeltaP fluctuates so flow fluctuates if loop is on MAN Let’s say we now have a flow rate of PV=SP=500 BD, and at that
flow rate, OP = 40% (i.e. valve is 40% open)
OP = Kc x Error + Bias
40 = Kc x 0 + Bias
Bias = 40
FCInstrument range
0~1000 BD
Pressure Drop,Delta P
SP = 500 BD(Barrels per Day)
An example We now want to control the flow at 600 BD (Operator
increase SP from 500 to 600)
Assume Kc = 0.5, so OP = 0.5(Error) + Bias
The controller detects an error of (600-500)/1000 = 10%
New OP = 0.5(10)+40 = 45%, so valve opens to 45%
What will be the new flow rate?– 3 possibilities: 500 < Flow < 600; 600 exactly; >600– Unlikely to get exactly 600 BD
An example Let’s say at 45%, the PV= 562.5 BD
– Error = (600 – 562.5)/1000 = 3.75%
Error has now decreased from 10% to 3.75%– New OP = 0.5(3.75%) + 40% = 41.88%– New flow = 523.4 BD
Recalculate Error and OP, and observe flow– Error = (600 – 523.4)/1000 = 7.66%– New OP = 0.5(7.66%) + 40% = 43.83%– New flow = 547.9 BD
This cycle will repeat itself Finally it will settle at a steady value, BUT
P-Only Control ResponseFlow Rate
400
450
500
550
600
650
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (Sec)
Flow
(BD
)
39.0%
44.0%
49.0%
54.0%
59.0%
SP
PV
OP
Problem With P-Only Control
It will not settle at 600 BD
There will always be an Offset (SP-final value that PV settles at)
Offset can be reduced by higher controller gain, Kc
But that can result in more drastic cycling before the PV settles down
In This Lecture…
Controller Actions
Proportional Control
Problems of Proportional-Only Control
In The Next Lecture… Integral Control
– Equation– How it works– Interaction with Proportional Action– Problems with Integral Action
Derivative Control– Equation– How it works– Problems with Derivative Action