Tolerance Charts[1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    1/38

    Tolerance Charts

    Dr. Pulak M. Pandey

    http://paniit.iitd.ac.in/~pmpandey

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    2/38

    Introduction

    A tolerance chart is a graphical method for

    presenting the manufacturing dimensions of aworkpiece or assembly at all stages of itsmanufacturing dimensions of a workpiece or

    assembly at all stages of its manufacturing The chart provides an intermediate control

    system of checks and balances to insure thatprocessing dimensions and tolerances will

    meet those specified on part prints The tolerance charts are useful in sorting

    dimensional problems on individual parts, and

    also useful in processing assemblies

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    3/38

    Purpose and Utilization of ToleranceCharts

    1. It permits the process engineer to determine in

    advance of tooling whether or not the part canbe made to part print tolerances. A surprisingnumber of designs are actually dimensionallyfaulty and can not be manufactured to print. If

    this condition can be discovered in advance,costly scrap can be prevented.

    2. It aids in developing proper manufacturing

    sequence.3. It provides a means of establishing the proper

    working tolerances for each operation in thesequence.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    4/38

    4. It provides assurance that sufficient stockremoval will always be available for eachoperation in the sequence and what thatamount is. If sufficient stock is not availabletolerance charts will disclose the same.

    5. When accuracy of the machine is known, thetolerance chart will indicate whether or not it iscapable of meeting part print specifications.

    6. It provides an intelligent instrument for

    negotiating with product design whenmanufacturing specifications cannot be meteconomically.

    7. It offers a convenient and useful check onalternate methods of dimensioning the part forprocessing purpose.

    8. It aids the process engineer in determining

    whether the part will arrive at its last operationwith desired dimensions and tolerances.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    5/38

    9. It helps to determine the practicability ofcombined tooling. Such as form tools-orcombinations of working and inspectiongauging.

    10. It provides a means of reducing dimensionalerrors which are likely to occur if complex partsare processed without the use tolerance charts.

    11. It aids in determining the proper raw materialsizes and in developing the necessary castingsand forgings.

    12. Together with the process picture sheet, thetolerance chart provides an invaluable aid inthe development of complete and accurateprocess routings.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    6/38

    Definitions and Symbols A working Dimensionis the distance between a

    locating surface and the surface beingprocessed.

    Stock removalis the difference between thedimension that existed prior to machining andmachining dimension.

    Resultant dimensionis the difference betweentwo dimensions or a dimension and anintermediate resultant. It is sometimes called as abalance dimension. An intermediate resultant

    occurs when additional stock removed in lateroperation will affect its size.

    Total toleranceis the total variation from the

    basic stock removal dimension which can resultfrom the operation performed.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    7/38

    The circled dot denotes a locating

    surface or centerline. The arrow

    denotes the surface or centerline of the

    surface to be machined.

    Working dimension when tools are set

    in a definite relation ship to oneanother. This occurs when combination

    tools are used.

    This figure represents a resultant

    dimension between machined

    surfaces, centerlines, or a centerline

    and a machined surface.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    8/38

    Rules for addingand subtracting

    tolerances

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    9/38

    Example:

    Cast steeldrive hub

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    10/38

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    11/38

    Conversion of asymmetrical tolerances into symmetrical tolerance

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    12/38

    Example of tolerance conversion

    0055.00015.5

    0055.0)0015.0000.5(000.5 007.0 004.0

    =

    +=+

    Add L

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    13/38

    Developing Tolerance Chart

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    14/38

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    15/38

    Assumptions Rough forging dimension = 2 in

    Nominal finish dimension = 1.920 in

    Difference = 0.080 in to be removed from twosurfaces B and G

    Both B and G surfaces are to be machined,hardened and ground, therefore let us assume

    that 0.010 in is left for grinding for each surface.

    Therefore stock to be removed from eachsurface = (0.080/2)-0.010= 0.030 in

    No change in dimensions due to heat treatmentprocesses will be assumed in this example.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    16/38

    Operation 10

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    17/38

    Operation 10: calculations

    Forging Dimension = 2.0000.010 in

    Operation 10, W.D. = 1.9700.002 in

    Stock removal = 0.0300.012 in

    Min. of 0.018 in and max. of 0.042 in.can be removed.

    No final (resulting) dimension is resultedfrom this operation.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    18/38

    Operation 20

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    19/38

    Operation 20: Calculations

    Three separate surfaces result from this operation. Locationtakes place on surface G which was machined in operation 10.Surface A is faced, the center hole is core drilled and reamed,and the surface C is turned. Here, we concern with surfaces Band C. Here, as in previous operation, a nominal 0.030 stock willbe removed from A. The working tolerance is 0.002 as before.

    Therefore,

    Operation 10, working dimension 1.9700.002

    Operation 20, working dimension 1.9400.002

    Stock removal 0.0300.004

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    20/38

    Operation 20 continued

    Surface C must be produced as a continuation ofoperation 20, using the same locating surface.Because the position of the surface C with respect to

    surface G is affected by the amount which will laterbe removed from surface G by grinding, allowancemust be made to insure that the final relationshipbetween these two surfaces is maintained. Since

    0.010 is allowed for stock removal in grinding, theworking dimension will be 1.7800.002. Therefore,

    Operation 20 (a), working dimension 1,9400.002

    Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Stock removal 0.1600.004

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    21/38

    Operation 30

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    22/38

    Operation 30: Calculations

    In the first step performed in operation 20,a nominalworking dimension of 1.940 was established betweensurfaces B and G. To determine the nominal working

    dimensions for operation 30, two things must beconsidered.

    1. The nominal dimension between surface G andsurface F.

    2. The nominal stock removal from surface G bygrinding in the final operation.

    The nominal working dimension for this operation is foundby subtracting these two dimensions from the nominalworking dimension from operation 20.

    1.940-0.200-0.010=1.730 with workingtolerance as 0.002.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    23/38

    Operation 30 continued

    Because this operation is carried out with a

    form tool, two surfaces are createdsimultaneously. This automatically fixes therelationship between surfaces E and F. Theform tool dimension which relates the twosurfaces can carry the full part print tolerance.The resultant dimension between surfaces Fand G can now be calculated as:

    Operation 20(a), working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 30, working dimension 1.7300.002

    Resultant (intermediate) 0.2100.004

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    24/38

    Operation 40

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    25/38

    Operation 40: calculations

    Working dimension for this operationmust take into account the allowance for

    grinding after hardening. Because thenominal depth of this milling cut is 0.250and the nominal allowance for grindingis 0.010, the working dimension fro thisoperation is will be 0.250+0.010=0.260

    with working tolerance 0.002.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    26/38

    Operation 50

    The prints requires a finished hardnessdepth of 0.0150.010. Actually, thisdepth can be controlled within 0.005.Because 0.010 is to be removed fromeach ground surface, the working casedepth is set as 0.0250.005. Since

    nothing has been removed from theworkpiece in carburizing and hardening,no stock removal is recorded. As

    indicated previously, there is no changein workpiece dimension and hence nochange in the resultant occurs.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    27/38

    Operation 60

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    28/38

    Operation 60: Calculations

    The working tolerance on grinding can be

    achieved as 0.0005. Because 0.010 hasbeen allowed for grinding, the workingdimension that must be held in this

    operation is 1.9300.0005. Thus stockremoval

    Operation 20, working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005Stock removal 0.0100.0025

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    29/38

    Operation 60 continued

    With the completion of operation 60, the dimensions fromsurface G to , G to C, and F to E are now finalized. Sincethe dimension from F to E was established earlier by theform tool and is not affected by this operation, it can be

    recorded as a resultant as shown in figure. Operation 30was the last to be performed on surface F beforeoperation 60. The resultant from G to F can now berecorded.

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005

    Operation 30, working dimension 1.7300.002

    Resultant 0.2000.0025

    The resultant dimension between surfaces C and G now

    becomes final and can be checked. Its previousdimension was attained in operation 20(b). Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Operation 60, Stock removal 0.0100.0025

    Resultant 1.7700.0045

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    30/38

    Operation 60 continued

    The case hardened depth of G must bechecked to make certain the grinding

    operation did not cause it to fall below thedepth specified. The case hardeneddepth is determined by the difference

    between the initial case depth workingdimension and the stock removal ingrinding

    Operation 50, working dimension 0.0250.005

    Operation 60, Stock removal 0.0100.0025

    Resultant 0.0150.0075

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    31/38

    Operation 70

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    32/38

    Operation 70: Calculations

    Aside from balancing final tolerances, operation 70completes the machining operations on the workpiece,unless it is found that additional operations must beperformed to correct tolerance stacking. Stock removal

    may be calculated as Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.0005 Operation 70, working dimension 1.9200.0005

    Stock removal 0.0100.001

    Other resulting dimension of B and D Operation 40, Working dimension 0.2600.002

    Operation 70, working dimension 0.0100.001

    Resultant 0.2500.003

    Dimension of B (case hardened depth) Operation 50, Working dimension 0.0250.005

    Operation 70, working dimension 0.0100.001

    Resultant 0.0150.006

    C l t t l Ch t ( b l )

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    33/38

    Complete tolerance Chart (unbalance)

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    34/38

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    35/38

    Balancing operation 60

    Operation 60 can now be recalculated

    as: Operation 20(a), working dimension 1.9400.002

    Operation 60, working dimension 1.9300.001

    Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Operation 20(b), working dimension 1.7800.002

    Operation 60, stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 1.7700.005

    The preceding resultant is now identical with the part printspecifications.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    36/38

    An intermediate resultant between surfaces Fand G was established as a result ofoperation 30. The final resultant was obtainedin Operation 60. Because the relationshipbetween surfaces E and F was determined by

    form tool, an increase can be made in theworking tolerance of operation 30 withoutaffecting other surfaces. The workingdimensions of operation 30 can be changed

    to 1.7300.004. The correct resultantbetween surfaces F and G will now be: Operation 60, working dimensions 1.9300.001

    Operation 30, working dimensions 1.7300.004Resultant 0.2000.005

    The dimension 0.1000.002 remains unchangedbecause it was established from the form tool.

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    37/38

    Balancing Operation 70 Operation 70 now can be recalculated as

    follows: Operation 60, Working dimension 1.9300.001

    Operation 70, working dimension 1.9200.002

    Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Operation 40, working dimension 0.2600.002

    Operation 70, stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 0.2500.005

    Operation 50, working dimension 0.2500.007

    Operation 70, Stock removal 0.0100.003

    Resultant 0.0150.010

    Completed Tolerance Chart

  • 8/3/2019 Tolerance Charts[1]

    38/38

    Completed Tolerance Chart