Tobacco and Alcohol in Sports Ad

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Tobacco and Alcohol in Sports Ad

    1/3

    L E H E R STOBACCO AND ALCOHOLADVERTISING IN TELEVISEDSPORTS: TIME TO FOCUS ONPOLICY CHANGE

    Zwarun' provided additional evidence for the presence of alcohol and tobacco advertis-

    ing during televised sporting events. Her fol-low-up to M adden and Grube's^ analysis ofalcohol and tobacco advertising in televisedsports demonstrates that although certaintypes of advertisements have decreased, thealcohol and tobacco industries have adaptedto advertising restrictions such as those in-cluded in the Master Settlement Agreement,the massive lawsuit between state attorneysgeneral and the tobacco industry.

    However, we believe Zwarun did not takeher recommendations far enough. Althoughthe article mentions the importance of theMaster Settlement Agreem ent in reducingthe frequency and type of ads, the authordid not suggest specific policy changes thatare needed to limit alcohol and tobaccomarketing in televised sports. It has beenestimated that youths make up 13% of thenational television viewing audience for alltypes of programming,^ and most youths re-port watching sporting events on television."*Numerous studies have provided evidence

    Letters to the editor referring to a recentJournal article are encouraged up to 3 monthsafter the article's appearance. By submitting aletter to the editor, the author gives permissionfor it s publication in thefoumal. Lettersshould n ot duplicate ma terial being publishedor submitted elsewhere. The editors reserve theright to edit and abridge letters an d to publishresponses.

    Text is limited to 400 words and 1 0 refer-ences. Submit online at www,ajph,orgforimmediate W eb posting, or at submitajpkorgfor later print publication. Online responsesare automatically considered or printpublication. Queries should be addressed tothe Editor-in-Chief Mary E , Northridge, PhD,MPH , at menll@colum bia,edu.

    for a connection between tobacco and alco-hol advertising during sporting events anduse of those products.^'^

    On the basis of the growing evidence forthe relationship between tobacco Eind alco-hol advertising and youth consumption ofthese products, we suggest that a shift isneeded to focus on policy change. The sur-geon general and others have described theconnection b etween policy and behaviorchange and recommend policies as a behav-ior change strategy.^"^ International tobaccomarketing standards stipulate that tobaccoads should not "be of particular appeal toyouth" or be shown at events with morethan 2 5 % young viewers'"; the alcohol in-dustry marketing code" prohibits ads in-tended to appeal to youths.

    Implementation of policies to further re-strict alcohol and tobacco advertising in tele-vised sports will be challenging; therefore, itwill be important for alcohol and tobacco re-secirchers and policy advocates to work col-laboratively. For examp le, efforts could jointlyfocus on developing policy to prohibit sportssponsorships for alcohol and tobacco prod-ucts during televised sporting events with ayouth audience of 15% or higher, a morespecific and stringent standard for both indus-tries. By working together on policy chang e,we believe that more substantive change canoccur to prevent or reduce underage use oftobacco and alcohol. As clearly illustrated byZwarun, the problem of alcohol and tobaccoadvertising in televised sports has be en welldescribed. We are overdue to move to thenext step and devise effective population-levelsolutions to youths' exposure to tobacco andalcohol advertising, a

    Elizabeth G , Klein, MPHRhonda ffones-Webb, D rPH

    A b o u t t h e A u t h o r sElizabeth G, Klein and Rhonda J , Jones-Webb are withthe Division of Epidemiotogy and Com munity Health atthe School of Public Health, University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,

    Requests for reprints should be sent to Elizabeth KlUniversity of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Divsion of Epidemiology, 1300 S Second Street, Suite 3Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015 (e-mail: klein_l@epumn,edu),

    doi:10,2l05/AfPH,2006,l02566

    R e f e r e n c e s1. Zwarun L. Ten years and 1 master settlementagreement later: the nature and frequency of alcohoand tobacco promotion in televised spoils, 2000through 2002. Am/Public Health, 2 0 0 6 ; 9 6 :1492- 1497 .2. Madden PA, Gnib e JW. The frequency and natof alcohol and tobacco advertising in televised sport1 9 9 0 - 1 9 9 2 . Am J Public Health, 1 9 9 4 : 8 : 2 9 7 - 2 9 93 . Grover PL, ed. Reducing Tobacco Use AmongYouth: Community-Based Approaches, Rockville, MdSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Admintration; 19974. Paul P Good sports. Am Demogr, 2001 ;23(1016- 18 .5. Ellickson P, Collins RL, Ham barsoo mian s K, MCaffrey DE Does alcohol advertising promote adolecent drinking? results from a longitudinal assessmen[published correction appears in Addiction, 2 0 0 5 ;100:1201]. Addiction, 2 0 0 5 ; 1 0 0 : 2 3 5 - 2 4 6 .6. Siege! M. Counteracting tobacco motor sportssponsorship as a promotional tool: is the tobacco stlement enough? AmJ Public Health, 2001 ; 91 :1100-1106.7. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Reporthe Surgeon General, Atlanta. Ga: U.S. Department Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Cotrol and Prevention; 2004.8. Hammond D. Fong GT, McDonald PW, CameroBrown KS. Impact of the graphic Canadian warninlabels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control. 22 : 3 9 1 - 3 9 5 .9. Wagen aar AC, Toomey TL. Effects of minimumdrinking age laws: review and analyses of the literafrom 1960 to 2000, f Stud Alcohol Suppl, 2002; Ma2 0 6 - 2 2 5 .10. Herzog B, Belpedio H. "International tobaccomarketing standards." New York. NY: Credit SuisseEirst Boston; 20 01 . Available at: http://www.ash.oruk/html/advspo/pdfs/csfb.pdf. Accessed November2 0 0 6 .1 1 . Code of Responsible Practices for Beverage AlcAdvertising and Marketing, Washington, DC: DistillSpirits Council of the United States; 2003. Availablhttp://www.discus.org/responsibility/code.asp. Ac-cessed November 2, 2006.

    ZWARUN RESPONDS

    I appreciate Klein and Jones-Webb's com-ments that it is important that the debate

  • 7/30/2019 Tobacco and Alcohol in Sports Ad

    2/3

    L E T T I

    over alcohol and tobacco advertising intelevised sports move in the direction ofpolicy recom mendations. The suggestionof prohibiting the placement of such adsin media vehicles with a certain percentageof underage people in their audiences isan especially good one, given the advancesbeing made in audience measurementmetrics.

    However, I would also like to point outthat, given the First Amendment protectionafforded commercial speech, the most realis-tic policy solutions will involve the coopera-tion of the alcohol and tobacco industriesthemselves, I would argue that content analy-es such as my own are important tools in

    eliciting such cooperation for2 reasons. First, the industries are likely toappreciate debate centered on an accurateand up-to-date description of current adv ertis-ng and, second, they are likely to feel pres-wareness of existing loopholes increases. B

    Lara Zwarun, PhD

    t t h e A u t h o ris with the Department of Communication,

    niversity of Texas, Ariington.Requests for reprints siiouid be sent to Lara Zwarun,

    Texas at

    doi:10.2105/AfPH.2006.l02939

    COLAOU AND

    conclusionsle are m ade on the basis of inac-

    misleading use of references. ForInternational Agency

    "operational" in developing countries for

    to organize screening programs have failed. . . in spite of a coverage of over 60% ."^'''^'''"Further, the authors cite as "voluminous evi-dence" of the feasibility of Papanicolaouscreening in developing countries just 3 refer-ences: a pilot project led by Suba et al. in acity in Vietnam, a set of guidelines in SouthAfrica that have yet to be successfully imple-mented, and the same International Agencyfor Research on Cancer document previouslycited as evidence that cytology-based pro-grams have been operational (but not effec-tive) in low-resource countries.

    Suba et a l. claim th at successful follow-upof screen-positive women is feasible, asproven in 6 countries they name, but all 6countries involved limited research studiesdone with external resources, not routinehealth services where the real-life problemof poo r follow-up prevails.'''*

    On visual "screen and treat," Suba et al,state that use of visual inspection with aceticadd (VIA) would "require performingcryosurgery on 18% to 7 1 % of women w hoare screened,""''''*^* The 3 references theycite for this claim (all from 2001 or earlier)list screen-positive rates of 28 % , 39% , and1 8 % , More recent studies (not cited by Subaet al.) produced test-positive rates from 7% to3 3 % , with most under 15%.''"^ Althoughsome overtreatment is inevitable (becauseeven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia identi-fied by cytology will often regress sponta-neously), VIA would not lead to treatment ofup to 7 1 % of all women screened, as repeat-edly stated by Suba et al.

    Contrary to the authors' assertion, visualscreen-and-treat algorithms by Alliance forCervical Cancer Prevention partners andothers all call for referring any woman witha lesion suspicious for cancer to further eval-uation, and VIA studies have missed few, ifany, cancers.^'" In addition, many propo-nents of visual inspection for routine servicealso recommend taking a biopsy before theablative treatment (wherever pathology ser-vices ex ist).'

    The drawbacks of cytology are now wellunderstoo d in resource-poor settings. VIA of-fers a viable alternative that deserves consid-eration on the basis of the evidence. D

    Vivien Davis T s u , P h D , MPH

    A b o u t t h e A u t h o rVivien T su is with th e Program for Appropriate Technoiogyin Health, Seattle, W ash.

    Requests for reprints should be sent to D r. Vivien Tsu,PATH,1455 NW Leary Way, Seattle, WA 98107 (e-maii:[email protected]).

    doi:W.2l05/AfPH.2006.102830

    R e f e r e n c e s1. Suba EJ, Murphy SK, Donnelly AD, Furia LM,Huynh ML, Raab SS. Systems analysis of real-world ob-stacles to successlul cervical cancer prevention in devel-oping countries. Am f Public Health. 2 0 0 6 ; 9 6 : 4 8 0 - 4 8 7 .2 . International Agency for Research on CancerCervix Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Press;2 0 0 5 . IARC Handbooits of Cancer Prevention, vol 10.3 . Gage JC, Ferreccio C, Gonzales M, Arroyo R,Huivin M, Robles SC. Follow-up care of women witban abnormal cytology in a low-resource setting. CancerDetect Prev. 2 0 0 3 : 2 7 : 4 6 6 - 4 7 1 .4 . Jeronimo J, Morales 0, Homa J, et al. Visual in-spection witb acetic acid for cervical cancer screeningoutside of low-resource settings. Rev Panam SaiudPublica. 2 0 0 5 : 1 7 : 1 - 5 .5 . Claeys P, De Vuyst H, Gonzalez C, Garcia A, BelloR E , Temmerman M. Performance of tbe acetic acid testwben used in field conditions as a screening test forcervical cancer Trop Med Int Health. 2 0 0 3 : 8 : 7 0 4 - 7 0 9 .6. Dob AS, Nkele NN, Acbu P, Essimbi F, Essame O,Nkegoum B. Visual inspection w itb acetic acid andcytology as screening metbods for cervical lesions inCameroon. Intf Gynaecol Obstet. 2 0 0 5 : 8 9 : 1 6 7 - 1 7 3 .7. Goel A, Gajidbi G, Batra S, Bbambhani S, Zutsbi V,Sacbdeva P. Visual inspection of tbe cervix witb aceticacid for cervical intraepitbelial lesions. Intf GynaecoiObstet. 2 0 0 5 : 8 8 : 2 5 - 3 0 .8. Sank aranaray anan R, Basu P, Wesley RS, et al.Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia:results from an IARC multicentre study in India andAfrica. Intf Cancer 2 0 0 4 : 1 1 0 : 9 0 7 - 9 1 3 .9. Sarian LO, Dercbain SF, Naud P, et al. Evaluationof visual inspection witb acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine(VILl), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervicalscreening tools in Latin America. Tbis report refers topartial results from tbe LAMS (Latin AMerican Screen-ing) study, f Med Screen. 2 0 0 5 : 1 2 : 1 4 2 - 1 4 9 .1 0 . Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention. Planningand Implementing Cervical Cancer Prevention an d ControPrograms: A M anual for Managers. Seattle, Wasb: Al-liance for Cervical Cancer Prevention: 2004.

    "Feasibility" refers to that which is possible,in addition to that which is operational, suc-cessfiil, or sustained. Papanicolaou screeningis feasible tmywhere cervical screening is ap-propriate, because it is not appropriate toscreen for cancer among communities with-out access to curative treatment services, andbecause communities with access to curativetreatment will also have access to cytology

  • 7/30/2019 Tobacco and Alcohol in Sports Ad

    3/3