BHALSWA CHOWK TO MUKUNDPUR

T

O

M

U

K

A

R

B

A

C

H

O

W

K

TO

WA

ZIR

AB

AD

PROPOSED CYCLE TRACK & BUS LANEOBSERVATION OF UTTIPEC INITS MEETING HELD ON 06-01-09

DRAWN BY

REGI

CRAPHTS CONSULTANTS (I) PVT. LTD. 14/3 MATHURA ROAD,FARIDABAD Ph-95129-2278813,2275948

PWD GOVT. OF DELHI

SCALE -

1 : 1000

DRG NO -

CRTS / PWD / RD-50 / 102

CRAPHTS

CONSULTANTS

CLIENT:

PROJECT:

TITLE:

CHECKED BY

P.ALAM

PREPARED ON

15 / 12 /2007

MANAGING

DIRECTOR

D.SANYAL

REVISED ONSL NO DATE AS PER REMARKR-1 17-06-08 CHANGE IN DIMENSION

R-2 13-01-09

STRETCH:

R-3 20-02-09

PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF

CORRIDOR (NH-I / ROAD - NO: 50) BETWEEN MUKARBA

CHOWK TO WAZIRABAD CHOWK

LAYOUT PLAN ( ALT-II)(MODIFIED AS PER WORKING GROUP II-B)

ii. Two right turning loops have been shown at Mukundpur junction. The right turning towards Wazirabad shall join the summit of the flyover and the loop for right turning from ORR shall traffic streams shall weave on the flyover slope and cause congestion. This may be re-examined.

iii. A flyover with surface level rotary has been proposed at Burari chowk junction. Integration of the next 45 meter road from Zone P-II be ensured by proper junction and a bridge over the supplementary drain.

iv. The feasibility of the proposed 30 meter road along the Bhalsawa lake and golf course may be checked. The supplementary drain should be cleaned and landscaped which will become an important feature of road network.

v. The intersection at Mukarba Chowk should take into account the proposal of Zonal Plan of Zone P-1(Narela) with respect to the proposed road along the Rly. Line.

i. As far as possible the continuity of interference-free footpaths and cycle tracks at intersections be shown.

ii. Traffic management plan/circulation plan for an area of around 1 km. along the both sides of ORR be prepared. Free left turn may be avoided at the intersections, even in case of signalized crossing.

iii. Slip roads and service roads wherever feasible, may be provided

iv. Width of service road, including footpath, may be at least 7.5 meters.

v. Provisions for segregated lanes and facilities for public transport system, including bus shops, be ensured.

vi. Traffic signals be shown at all intersections with provision for separate signal phase for cars, buses, NMT. Signal timings be calculated as per the traffic projections.

vii. Location of signage be shown in the plans.

viii. The details of effected structures and trees /bushes be given in the feasibility format. ix. Right of Way line of all roads as per the Master Plan / Zonal Development Plan be shown in the plan.x. A traffic management plan and a work zone Management plan during the construction period be prepared.

xi. Width of the flyover / elevated road on outer ring road to be maintained as per the existing under pass on Maduban Chowk

I. The project must also include cleaning and landscaping of supplementary drain, as this being an important feature of the project.

II. Intersection of Mukarba Chowk should take into account, the proposal of Zonal plan (Zone - P-I Narela) specially the road along railway line.

III. Traffic management/ Work zone management plan during construction be prepared in consultation with Traffic Police for the influence area of about 1 k.m on either side of road

a. The project of PWD was considered by UTTIPEC Working Group IIB in its meeting dt.19.02.09. and the proposal

i. The proposed network as per the zonal development plan of zone P-II including 45 mt. R/W road along Bhalsawa Lake be integrated with the ORR proposal. The existing bridge on the with a direct link of the 45 meter road from Zone P-II to ORR.

Observations / suggestions:

b. UTTIPEC Governing body in its meeting held on 20.2.09 under the chairmanship of Hon'ble L.G, Delhi accorded its approval, based on the recommendation and

additional observations:-

is recommended for consideration & approval by the

observations :- UTTIPEC Governing Body with the following decisions /

observation/concern of the working group meeting with following

supplementary drain may be widened together

start at the foot of the same flyover. The two

SL.

NO.

OBSERVATIONS COMPLIANCE

Extra lane provided on the flyover and weaving length increased to 300m

Incorporated

Incorporated modified design for safer Cycle track and pedestrian crossing across traffic rotaries also provided.

Shown in the Layout Plan

Provided wherever required2.5 m width of footpath proposed. No service road has beenproposed over this segment .IncorporatedTraffic signal indicated in the plan.

Separate Signage Plan prepared and updated (Ref. dwg. no.

Submitted

Shown in the Plan.

Shall be submitted before execution of the project.

Not Applicable. However, consistency is maintained with carriageway leading from Mukarba Chowk.

Traffic management plan has already been proposed. Work zone managementplan shall be prepared in consultation with the Traffic Police.

Incorporated in the revised drawings. Alternative direct link withNew Bridge over Supplementary drain included in revised drawing.

Feasibility checked. Lining on Slope of Drain and B/W along Drain is already under construction by Irrigation andFlood Control dept. Land scaping of drain will have to be taken up along with proposed Project.

Proposed Road along Railway line does not affect Mukerba Chowk grade separator any way. Intersection atMukerba Chowk already opened to traffic on 01.03.2009. Feasibility Study for Proposed Road along railway trackto connect Azadpur Mandi with Lampur was carried out by APMC. Till the same is approved by UTTIPEC androad declared as Master Plan Road PWD, GNCTD can not take up the work.

Lining on Slope of Drain and B/W along Drain is already under construction by Irrigation andFlood Control dept. Land scaping of drain will have to be carried out along with proposed Project.

Proposed Road along Railway line does not affect Mukerba Chowk grade separator any way. Intersection at MukerbaChowk already opened to traffic on 01.03.2009. Feasibility Study for Proposed Road along railway track to connectAzadpur Mandi with Lampur was carried out by APMC, Till the same is approved by UTTIPEC and road declared asMaster Plan Road. PWD, GNCTD can not take up the work.

CRTS / PWD / RD-50 / SGN / 301 TO 308)

Supplementary Drain

B

H

A

L

S

W

A

D

A

IR

Y

J

H

A

N

G

IR

P

U

R

I

M

U

K

A

N

D

P

U

R

M

U

K

A

N

D

P

U

R

S

A

N

T

N

A

G

A

R

J

H

A

R

O

D

A

M

A

J

R

A

B

U

R

A

R

I

R

O

A

D

- 50

R

O

A

D

- 5

1

M

U

K

U

R

B

A

C

H

O

W

K

B

H

A

L

S

W

A

C

H

O

W

K

M

U

K

A

N

D

P

U

R

C

H

O

W

K

B

U

R

A

R

I

C

H

O

W

K

C

O

R

O

N

A

T

IO

N

P

A

R

K

N

H

-

1

O

U

T

E

R

R

I

N

G

R

O

A

D

G

.

T

.

R

O

A

D

R

O

A

D

- 50

R

O

A

D

-

5

0

Supplementary Drain

Supplem

entary D

rain

T

O

I

S

B

T

S

A

R

U

P

N

A

G

A

R

N

E

W

S

A

R

U

P

N

A

G

A

R

J

H

A

N

G

IR

P

U

R

I

IN

D

L

. A

R

E

A

R

A

J

IV

N

A

G

A

R

G

A

N

D

H

I

V

IH

A

R

W

A

Z

IR

A

B

A

D

R

O

A

D

-

5

0

M

U

K

H

E

R

J

E

E

N

A

G

A

R

IN

D

IR

A

V

IK

A

S

C

O

L

O

N

Y

TO GHAZIABAD

B

H

A

L

S

W

A

L

A

K

E

J

H

A

R

O

D

A

D

A

IR

Y

S

A

N

J

A

Y

G

A

N

D

H

I

T

R

A

N

S

P

O

R

T

N

A

G

A

R

S

u

p

p

l

e

m

e

n

t

a

r

y

D

r

a

i

n

S

H

A

N

T

I

S

W

A

R

O

O

P

M

A

R

G

P

A

R

A

D

E

M

A

R

G

T

O

M

A

D

H

U

B

A

N

C

H

O

W

K

T

O

A

Z

A

D

P

U

R

T

IM

A

R

P

U

R

N

E

H

R

U

V

IH

A

R

N

IR

A

N

K

A

R

I

C

O

L

O

N

Y

KEY PLAN

R-4 3-08-09 KEY PLAN, CYCLE TRACKR-5 13-11-09

NOTES:

1. FOR ANY PROPOSED FUTURE ELEVATED BRT CORRIDOOR, BUS STOPS/ BUS BAYS MAY BE PROVIDED

ON TOP OF FLYOVER GIVING A SEPARATE BUS LANE AT THE CURB - SIDE OF THE FLYOVER. BUS BAYS

MAY BE AT AN OPTIMUM SPACING OF 1000 m LOCATED ABOVE THE GROUND LEVELBUS BAYS OR ABOVE

BUSY GROUND LEVEL INTERSECTIONS.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS MENTIONED OTHERWISE.

3. ALL SIGNAL TIMINGS ARE IN SECONDS. LEFT AND RIGHT TURNING TRAFFIC ALSO PART OF SIGNAL

TIMINGS.

4. SCHEMATIC TRANSVERSE CROSS SECTION OF TABLE TOP CROSSING IS BASED ON “IHT GUIDELINES ON

TRAFFIC CALMING TECHNIQUES (2005) ”. STANDARD WIDTH IS 7 M UNLESS MENTIONED OTHERWISE.

5. WHERE PEDESTRIAN FOOTPATH AND SERVICE ROAD IS NOT SEPARATED BY THE GREEN BELT,

BOLLARDS WITH A MINIMUM SPACING OF 1,000 MM WILL BE REQUIRED TO SEPARATE THE TWO FOR

ALLOWING WHEELCHAIR ACCESS ACROSS THE SERVICE ROAD AS WELL AS PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.

BOLLARD DESIGN WILL FOLLOW THE BRTS STANDARDS.

6. TACTILE TILES (GUIDING AND WARNING) MAY BE PLACED ON

a. FOOTPATHS AND APPROACH TO TABLETOP CROSSINGS

b. IN FRONT OF AN ENTRANCE/EXIT TO A FACILITY LIKE FOB/ELEVATOR

c. TO AND FROM A STAIRCASE OR MULTILEVEL CROSSING FACILITY

d. IN OPEN SPACE TO ORIENT PERSONS WITH VISION IMPAIRMENT

(REF. BRTS CORRIDOOR STANDARDS)

7. FOR FOB'S, LIFTS ARE ESSENTIAL FOR HANDICAP AND CYCLIST CROSSING AND ACCESS, ESCALATOR

OR STAIRCASE MAY BE CONSIDERED. NO RAMPS TO BE CONSIDERED IN FOB DESIGN.

8. RAMPS OF GRADE 1:20 TO BE PROVIDED IN ALL PLACES THAT IS BETWEEN FOOTPATH & TABLETOP

CROSSINGS FOR WHEEL CHAIR ACCESS (FOR HANDICAP)

9. FOR FOBS: LIFT IS A MUST FOR WHEEL CHAIR PLUS CYCLIST ACCESS. HENCE, MINIMUM SIZE WILL BE 1400MM X

1400MM). ESCALATOR OR STAIRCASE MUST BE PROVIDED BUT NO RAMPS ARE ALLOWED. LIFTS MUST

PREFERABLY CONFORM TO OTIS GEN2 COMMERCIAL-LD MODEL TYPE OR EQUIVALENT.

10. LIFTS SPECIFICATIONS: LOAD CAPACITY (KG) - 1275, PASSENGERS CAPACITY - 17, CAR DIMENSIONS (MM) - 17

DEEP CARS, WIDTH - 1450, DEPTH - 2000.

11. 1:12 TO 1:20 SLOPE FOR TABLE TOP CROSSINGS

12. TABLE TOP CROSSINGS SHOULD HAVE TACTILE TILES ENGINEERING CONFIGURATION AS PER NEW IRC CODE

(REFER: CPWD GUIDELINES)

13. TACTILE PAVING STANDARDS SHOULD BE INCORPORATED ON ALL PAVEMENTS, TABLE TOP CROSSINGS AND

LEVEL CHANGERS.

14. LIFTS SHOULD HAVE AUDITORY SIGNALS AND BRAIL BUTTONS.

15. SIGNAGES SHOULD BE AS PER IRC DRAFT SIGNAGE CODE FOR UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY INCORPORATED IN

THE IRC-67.

16. TRAFFIC LIGHTS SHOULD HAVE :

(A) AUDITORY SIGNALS FOR PERSONS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT

(B) GREEN MAIN AND RED MAIN PHASE SHOULD BE GIVEN AT ALL.

17. PELICAN SIGNALS SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO ALL NON-SIGNALIZED AT GRADE PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS.

18. 300 MM ALL AROUND MANHOLES SHOULD HAVE DIFFERENT COLOUR AND TEXTURE FOR PERSONS WITH VISUAL

IMPAIRMENT.

19. TREES SHOULD PREFERABLY BE UPROOTED AND RELOCATED WITHIN PROJECT SITE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

20. ALL PAVEMENT HEIGHTS SHOULD BE BETWEEN 150-180 MM. ALL TABLE TOP CROSSINGS SHOULD BE 50 MM

ABOVE ROAD LEVEL AND JOINTING THE FOOTPATH IN 1:50 SLOPE.

21. HORTICULTURE AND RAINWATER HARVESTING DETAILS MUST BE INCORPORATED WITH IN THE GREEN BELT OR

BIO-SWALE AREAS.

22. DETAILED DRG WILL BE PREPAIRED AS PER PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES OF UTTIPEC BEFORE

IMPLEMENTATIONS OF PROJECT

R-6 15-02-10 FOB, UTILITY ZONE