Upload
cecilia-parker
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
To build a data-driven and an evidence-based school self-evaluation culture through the use of APASO
Sharing Outline
Part II : How to collect data?
Part III :How to use the data?
Part I : How to set the stage?
Part I : How to set the stage?
1)Background in using APASO
2)Purpose
3)Choice of personnel
4)Choice of scales
5)Sample size
Background & PurposeYear Status Purpose2011 End of SDP (2008-2011) • Locate the foci for next
SDC (2011 -2014) and planning ahead
2012 1st year of SDP (2011-2014) • Cross –year reference• Evaluation of measures in Major Concern 1 (1st Year) and planning ahead
2013 2nd year of SDP (2011-2014)
• 3-year trend• Evaluation of measures in Major Concern 1 (2nd Year) and planning ahead
*SDP: School Development Plan
1. Teacher-in-charge of SSE
2. Senior teacher (e.g. School Development Committee members or School Improvement Committee members )
3. IT teacher / Mathematics (Statistics) teacher
4. IT Technician
People are more important than system
Choice of Personnel
Choice of ScalesYear Scales and sub-
scalesMode
2011 Attitude to School (Attitude)Motivation: (Learning)• Affiliation•Praise•Task•Token
Online mode
2012 Attitude to School(Attitude)Motivation:(Learning)•Praise•Task•Token
Online mode
2013 Attitude to School(Attitude)Motivation:(Learning)•Praise•Task•Token
Online mode
Sample size
Year Students Teachers Parents
2011 All students(S1 – S6)
All teaching staff
20% (S1 – S6)
2012 All students(S1 – S6)
All teaching staff
20%(S1 – S6)
2013 All students(S1 – S6)
All teaching staff
20%(S1 – S6)
Time & Venue
Year Students Teachers Parents
201120122013
Roll call / Computer Literacy Lessons(2-3 weeks in March for S1 – S5)(S6 in late Feb)Computer Rooms
Anytime(3 weeks in March )Link in eClass
Parents’ Day(Late February)Computer Room
Part II : How to collect data?
Part III : How to use the data?
1) Observations
2) Collection of other supporting data
3) Follow-up discussion or meetings
4) Finding solutions and making suggestions
From raw data to discussion focus
Box Plot
Item Bar Chart
Cross-year Trend
Focus for further investigation
Mean Plot
Mean Plot Study the Mean and the HK Norm
Is the mean higher or lower than the HK
norm?e.g. Negative Affect higher than the norm /T-S Relationship lower than the norm
Mean Plot Study the Effect Size
Effect Size?Negligible / Small/ Moderate / High
Box Plot
Study the following: Maximum 75th Percentile Median 25th Percentile Minimum
Box Shape?
Item Bar Charts Study the specific questions
Spot the foci
Item Bar Charts Study the bars and the percentages
Percentage of “strongly disagree” and “disagree” is higher than HK norm
Item Bar Charts Study the questions, the Mean, the HK Norm and the Effective Size
Effect size is moderate and small
Cross-year Trend
Bar charts
are more
reader-friendly
Cross-year Trend
Study the cross-year trend
NSS phenomenon
Is the trend rising or declining?
Cross-year Trend
Study the cross-year trend
Rising trend slightly higher than HK norm
Identifying Focus
Verifications
Meetings & Suggestions
Planning ahead
From Focus to Plans
Further verification
Focus
External surveys
ESR reportOther school
records
Meeting social worker
Meeting teachers Meeting students
Redo the survey Internal surveys
Verification with other findings
External Survey Internal Survey Meetings
ESR report
SHS
PISA
SWOT analysis
KISS analysis
Discipline records
ECA records
Counseling record
Life-wide learning record
Students
Class Teachers
Subject Teachers
HoDs
Parents
School Development Committee
Tools facilitating meetings & discussion Follow up discussion of stakeholders and APASO(2011-2012)
Participation
Ownership
Tools facilitating meetings & discussion Follow up discussion of stakeholders and APASO II (2011-2012)
Follow up or not?
If yes, how?
Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)
Appropriate Summary and Guidance
Tools for identifying focus for follow up action
Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)
Appropriate Summary and Guidance
Tools for identifying focus for follow up action
Case Study 1 : Negative Affect in S1
Meeting students
Meeting teachers
Case Study 1 : Negative Affect in S1Meeting S1 Students and class teachers
Case Study 2 : Motivation _ Learning Drive, Attitude and Strategies
Staff Development Day
Teachers were assigned with different survey findings and questions for discussion
Case Study 2 : Motivation _ Learning Drive, Attitude and Strategies
Discussion tools
Documents are tabled to facilitate group discussion
Case Study 2 : Motivation _ Learning Drive, Attitude and Strategies
Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)Stakeholders’ survey & APASO
Questions are similar
Tools for making suggestions Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)
Tools for making suggestions
Colleagues made
suggestions to enhance students’ drive in learning
Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)
Tools for making suggestions
Findings from Stakeholders’ Survey : Cross –year Trend (2010- 2013)
Tools for making suggestions
Case Study 2 : Motivation _ Learning Drive, Attitude and Strategies
Teachers presented their observations and suggestions
Planning Ahead
*SMC : School Management Committee *ASP : Annual School Plan
Observations & Suggestions
Drafting of ASP
SDC/ HoDs / Staff Meetings
Endorsement of ASP in SMC meeting
Conclusion
APASO is : A Good Tool for School Self-evaluation The use of APASO played an important role
in PLANNING and EVALUATION process in the PIE cycle.
Conclusion
APASO can : Facilitate more objective and sound judgments Keep good tracking record for school
development Provide a good platform for whole school
discussion Help enhance transparency and ownership
among colleagues Set a model for different teams and units to
follow
Bonus
A data-driven and an evidence-based culture was gradually built.
Thank You