Upload
claud-west
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Title: Guidelines for Security Planning - the Australian Model
Author: Alan GascoyneEconomy: Australia
Council of Australian Governments meeting following 2005 London terrorist attacks
made 12 recommendations to improve land transport security
Why the need for guidelines?
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Inspector of Transport Security asked to conduct review of surface transport security in Australia
made 31 recommendations to improve land transport security
included a number of recommendations related to security planning guidelines
Why the need for guidelines? (cont.)
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Federal system of government States are self-governing
Powers are divided between a central government and individual states
Surface transport security is the responsibility of states and territories
Australian Government Model
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Sovereignty of states and territories
Differing legislation in the jurisdictions
Geographic and demographic differences
Different levels of risk between and within jurisdictions
Challenges
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Transport Security Working Group (TSWG)
senior transport security officials from each state, territory and the Federal Government
Working Group formed to develop guidelines
Developing the Guidelines
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Definition of Surface Transport:
‘heavy and light rail, bus and ferry operations that provide a mass passenger function’
The Guidelines
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Purpose:
To assist surface transport operators in preparing security plans with a focus on addressing terrorism-related risks, or to assist in review the arrangements of those operations already covered by a security plan
The Guidelines (cont.)
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Security planning principles government / industry partnership intelligence led risk managed approach sound risk management techniques used continuous review & assessment other lower level security risks addressed /
other hazards responsibility rests with the owner and
operators
The Guidelines (cont.)
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Planning approach
CT threat assessment CT security risk assessment Develop security plan
The Guidelines (cont.)
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Implement staff security awareness training
Review and test plan
Appendix – ‘Guide to preparing a surface transport security plan’
The Guidelines (cont.)
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
No 42
“The Working Group to share experiences in the implementation of security measures with a view to advising economies on trade facilitation impacts (including to harmonise security arrangements).
Ministerial Directive
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
That Member Economies take into account the Australian Security Planning Guidelines when developing their own guidelines.
Recommendation
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru
Questions?
25-29 August 2008, Lima, Peru
31st APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting (TPT-WG31), Lima, Peru