1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica, syn. Reynoutria japonica; Polygonum cuspidatum) is a clonal plant species that has formed dense monocultures in the riparian zone of the Bronx River in New York City. The knotweed stands have displaced na/ve vegeta/on, decreased biological and structural diversity, and hampered restora/on efforts in this vital riparian habitat. The purpose of this study is to test the effec/veness of two manual knotweed removal techniques and to examine the effects of these removals on the remaining herbaceous community and on newly planted pin oak (Quercus palustris) saplings in a typical container size used in restora/ons. In the spring of 2010, 120 2 x 2 meter plots were designated at two sites in the Bronx River Forest (BRF) and the New York Botanical Garden (NYBG). The knotweed removal treatments were: A) cuYng or B) root/rhizome removal. These treatments were repeated each year from 20102012 in both sites. Both removal treatments were equally effec/ve at reducing the height of the knotweed canopy at the end of the season and improving the growth of pin oak saplings. Neither treatment was effec/ve in suppressing the density of knotweed stems at the end of the season and neither treatment supported an increased cover of other herbaceous vegeta/on. In conclusion, knotweed management based on cuYng will have similar results with less effort compared to root and rhizome removal. However, neither technique is effec/ve at elimina/ng knotweed and the recovery of na/ve species is limited, at least in the ini/al years of this management program. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND 1. Are mechanical methods of cuYng and root/rhizome removal of Japanese knotweed effec/ve management techniques? 2. Does mechanical management of Japanese knotweed affect other plant species? 3. Does mechanical management of Japanese knotweed affect the growth of a restora/on tree sapling? STUDY QUESTIONS RESULTS MAIN FINDINGS There is no apparent benefit to the laborious removal of roots and rhizomes on plots of this size Mechanical removal techniques are unlikely to be effec/ve at elimina/ng knotweed, given widespread presence However, frequent removals at the local scale may benefit the growth of saplings, with poten/al longerterm benefits for canopy closure Pragma/sm is essen/al in management decisions to ensure mechanical removal is used where it will have the best outcome REFERENCES Bronx River Alliance. 2006. The Bronx River Ecological Restora/on and Management Plan. hcp://www.bronxriver.org/puma/images/usersubmiced/greenway_plan/#pdf Dommanget, F., Evece, A., Spiegelberger, T., Gallet, C., Pacé, M., Imbert, M., & Navas, M.L. (2014). Differen/al allelopathic effects of Japanese knotweed on willow and coconwood cuYngs used in riverbank restora/on techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 132, 71–8. Gerber, E., Krebs, C., Murrell, C., MoreY, M., Rocklin, R., & Schaffner, U. (2008). Exo/c invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) nega/vely affect na/ve plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats. Biological ConservaAon, 141(3), 646–654. Maerz, J. C., Blossey, B., & Nuzzo, V. (2005). Green Frogs Show Reduced Foraging Success in Habitats Invaded by Japanese knotweed. Biodiversity and ConservaAon, 14(12), 2901–2911. New York City Department of Parks and Recrea/on – Natural Resource Group. 2012. Bronx River Riparian Invasive Plant Management Plan. hcps://www.nycgovparks.org/pagefiles/53/FINALbronxriverriparianinvasiveplantmanagement planapril302012.pdf Tanner, R. A., & Gange, A. C. (2013). The impact of two nonna/ve plant species on na/ve flora performance: poten/al implica/ons for habitat restora/on. Plant Ecology, 214(3), 423–432. Urgenson, L. S., Reichard, S. H., & Halpern, C. B. (2009). Community and ecosystem consequences of giant knotweed (Polygonum sachalinense) invasion into riparian forests of western Washington, USA. Biological ConservaAon, 142(7), 1536–1541. Weston, L. A., Barney, J. N., & DiTommaso, A. (2005). A Review of the Biology and Ecology of Three Invasive Perennials in New York State: Japanese Knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) and Pale Swallowwort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Plant and Soil, 277(12), 53–69. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was made possible with funding from the Wildlife Conserva/on SocietyNa/onal Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra/on, Lower Bronx River Partnership. Brian Aucoin, Ka/e Conrad, Anthony Copioli, Erica DeLuca, Chris Ekstrom, Elaine Feliciano, Valerie Francis, Francesca Giordano, Jennifer Greenfeld, Anne Hunter, Frances Knickmeyer, Kathy Lee, Penny Maca, Michael Mendez, Ellen Pehek, Adam Thornbrough, Ferdie Yau. Numerous Volunteers, Interns, and Students. The Bronx River extends 23 miles, star/ng in Valhalla, New York, and flowing through Westchester and the Bronx into the East River. The river has been heavily impacted in the past 200 years by dams, railroads, industry, road construc/on, and urbaniza/on. These impacts have greatly disturbed and altered the river’s ecosystems and made the river suscep/ble to invasion by Japanese knotweed, which is now widely distributed along the banks of the river. Japanese knotweed is in a perennial clonal plant species that originates from East Asia. It was first introduced in the U.S. as an ornamental garden plant and has since spread. It has large stems that can reach lengths of over 5 meters and it primarily expands through rhizome growth or rhizome fragment dispersal. Rhizomes can grow over 1 meter below the surface, can extend over 10 meters in length, are coarse and do not stabilize banks as well as fine rooted na/ve woody and herbaceous plants. This species degrades the structure and func/on of the riparian zone by forming dense monocultures that reduce the regenera/on of na/ve plant species and promote eroded, steep banks. Dense stands of knotweed lower not only plant, but animal diversity in the system by reducing habitat provided by large woody species which create instream cover for organisms. Invasive species management is of high importance to the preserva/on of the limited remaining natural riparian habitats along the Bronx River. The NYC Parks Natural Resource Group, in collabora/on with the Bronx River Alliance and the New York Botanical Garden, built upon the 2006 Ecological and Restora/on and Management Plan for the Bronx River, with the Riparian Invasive Plant Management Plan in 2012. This plan outlined management goals for curbing invasive species in riparian zones and emphasized Japanese knotweed control. This study was conceived based on the need for knotweed management and it serves to contribute more knowledge and data on the effec/veness of different management techniques. 1 Ecology, Evolu/on, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 2 The New York Botanical Garden, 3 NYC Parks and Recrea/on Natural Resources Group, 4 Bronx River Alliance Christopher A. Haight 1 , Jessica A. Schuler 2 , Kathleen McCarthy 3 , Sarah Lumban Tobing 3 , Robin Kriesberg 4 , Marit Larson 3 ,Machew Palmer 1 Japanese Knotweed Management in the Riparian Zone of the Bronx River: The effect of different removal techniques on sapling growth and the herbaceous layer METHODS 1. 120, 2m x 2m plots along knotweeddominated banks of the river: 60 plots in The Bronx River Forest 60 plots in The New York Botanical Garden 2. Planted a containersize pin oak sapling in the center of each plot in April 2010. 3. Three treatment types: 1. Cut 3 /mes/year (June, July, September) 2. Cut 1 /me/year (June) and grub 2 /mes/year (July, September) 3. Control (no treatment) 4. Treatment years 1. Bronx River Forest, 20102012. 2. NYBG, 20102013 and beyond. 5. Plot monitoring in September every year before final treatments. CuYng Plot Root Removal Plot Control Plot Japanese Knotweed Pin Oak Herbaceous Layer CONCLUSION The Bronx River CuYng and grubbing plots on the Bronx River in the New York Botanical Garden CuYng and root/rhizome removal are equally effec/ve Mechanical removals reduce knotweed height, but have no effect on stem density Oak saplings have more rapid growth and higher survival in knotweedremoval plots Knotweed rapidly recovers in the removal plots, and the growth of other species is limited Year - NY Botanical Garden Knotweed Stem Count Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 0 20 40 60 80 100 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 0 20 40 60 80 100 Year - NY Botanical Garden Knotweed Stem Height (cm) Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 0 30 60 90 120 160 200 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 0 30 60 90 120 160 200 Year - NY Botanical Garden Pin Oak Stem Diameter (cm) Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Year - NY Botanical Garden Pin Oak Height (cm) Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Year - NY Botanical Garden Pin Oak Percent Survival Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Year - NY Botanical Garden Species Richness Cutting - NYBG Grubbing - NYBG Control - NYBG 2010 2011 2012 0 5 10 15 20 Year - Bronx River Forest Cutting - BRF Grubbing - BRF Control - BRF 2010 2011 2012 0 5 10 15 20

THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) Japanese&Knotweed… · 2017. 8. 10. · Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) Japanese&Knotweed… · 2017. 8. 10. · Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you.

Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL   DISTORTED  

Corner  handles  

Good

 prin

/ng  qu

ality

 

Bad  prin/n

g  qu

ality

 

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©  2013  PosterPresenta/ons.com          2117  Fourth  Street  ,  Unit  C                            Berkeley  CA  94710          [email protected]  

               Japanese  knotweed  (Fallopia  japonica,  syn.  Reynoutria  japonica;  Polygonum  cuspidatum)  is  a  clonal  plant  species  that  has  formed  dense  monocultures  in  the  riparian  zone  of  the  Bronx  River  in  New  York  City.  The  knotweed  stands  have  displaced  na/ve  vegeta/on,  decreased  biological  and  structural  diversity,  and  hampered  restora/on  efforts  in  this  vital  riparian  habitat.  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  test  the  effec/veness  of  two  manual  knotweed  removal  techniques  and  to  examine  the  effects  of  these  removals  on  the  remaining  herbaceous  community  and  on  newly  planted  pin  oak  (Quercus  palustris)  saplings  in  a  typical  container  size  used  in  restora/ons.  In  the  spring  of  2010,  120  2  x  2  meter  plots  were  designated  at  two  sites  in  the  Bronx  River  Forest  (BRF)  and  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden  (NYBG).  The  knotweed  removal  treatments  were:  A)  cuYng  or  B)  root/rhizome  removal.  These  treatments  were  repeated  each  year  from  2010-­‐2012  in  both  sites.  Both  removal  treatments  were  equally  effec/ve  at  reducing  the  height  of  the  knotweed  canopy  at  the  end  of  the  season  and  improving  the  growth  of  pin  oak  saplings.  Neither  treatment  was  effec/ve  in  suppressing  the  density  of  knotweed  stems  at  the  end  of  the  season  and  neither  treatment  supported  an  increased  cover  of  other  herbaceous  vegeta/on.  In  conclusion,  knotweed  management  based  on  cuYng  will  have  similar  results  with  less  effort  compared  to  root  and  rhizome  removal.  However,  neither  technique  is  effec/ve  at  elimina/ng  knotweed  and  the  recovery  of  na/ve  species  is  limited,  at  least  in  the  ini/al  years  of  this  management  program.    

ABSTRACT  

BACKGROUND  

1.  Are  mechanical  methods  of  cuYng  and  root/rhizome  removal  of  Japanese  knotweed  effec/ve  management  techniques?    

2.  Does  mechanical  management  of  Japanese  knotweed  affect  other  plant  species?  

3.  Does  mechanical  management  of  Japanese  knotweed  affect  the  growth  of  a  restora/on  tree  sapling?      

STUDY  QUESTIONS   RESULTS   MAIN  FINDINGS  

•  There  is  no  apparent  benefit  to  the  laborious  removal  of  roots  and  rhizomes  on  plots  of  this  size  

•  Mechanical  removal  techniques  are  unlikely  to  be  effec/ve  at  elimina/ng  knotweed,  given  widespread  presence  

•  However,  frequent  removals  at  the  local  scale  may  benefit  the  growth  of  saplings,  with  poten/al  longer-­‐term  benefits  for  canopy  closure  

•  Pragma/sm  is  essen/al  in  management  decisions  to  ensure  mechanical  removal  is  used  where  it  will  have  the  best  outcome  

REFERENCES  Bronx  River  Alliance.  2006.  The  Bronx  River  Ecological  Restora/on  and  Management  Plan.    hcp://www.bronxriver.org/puma/images/usersubmiced/greenway_plan/#pdf  Dommanget,  F.,  Evece,  A.,  Spiegelberger,  T.,  Gallet,  C.,  Pacé,  M.,  Imbert,  M.,  &  Navas,  M.-­‐L.  (2014).  Differen/al  allelopathic  effects  of  Japanese  knotweed  on  willow  and  coconwood  cuYngs  used  in  riverbank  restora/on  techniques.  Journal  of  Environmental  Management,  132,  71–8.    Gerber,  E.,  Krebs,  C.,  Murrell,  C.,  MoreY,  M.,  Rocklin,  R.,  &  Schaffner,  U.  (2008).  Exo/c  invasive  knotweeds  (Fallopia  spp.)  nega/vely  affect  na/ve  plant  and  invertebrate  assemblages  in  European  riparian  habitats.  Biological  ConservaAon,  141(3),  646–654.    Maerz,  J.  C.,  Blossey,  B.,  &  Nuzzo,  V.  (2005).  Green  Frogs  Show  Reduced  Foraging  Success  in  Habitats  Invaded  by  Japanese  knotweed.  Biodiversity  and  ConservaAon,  14(12),  2901–2911.    New  York  City  Department  of  Parks  and  Recrea/on  –  Natural  Resource  Group.  2012.  Bronx  River  Riparian  Invasive  Plant  Management  Plan.                                                                                                          hcps://www.nycgovparks.org/pagefiles/53/FINAL-­‐bronx-­‐river-­‐riparian-­‐invasive-­‐plant-­‐management-­‐plan-­‐april-­‐30-­‐2012.pdf  Tanner,  R.  A.,  &  Gange,  A.  C.  (2013).  The  impact  of  two  non-­‐na/ve  plant  species  on  na/ve  flora  performance:  poten/al  implica/ons  for  habitat  restora/on.  Plant  Ecology,  214(3),  423–432.    Urgenson,  L.  S.,  Reichard,  S.  H.,  &  Halpern,  C.  B.  (2009).  Community  and  ecosystem  consequences  of  giant  knotweed  (Polygonum  sachalinense)  invasion  into  riparian  forests  of  western  Washington,  USA.  Biological  ConservaAon,  142(7),  1536–1541.    Weston,  L.  A.,  Barney,  J.  N.,  &  DiTommaso,  A.  (2005).  A  Review  of  the  Biology  and  Ecology  of  Three  Invasive  Perennials  in  New  York  State:  Japanese  Knotweed  (Polygonum  cuspidatum),  Mugwort  (Artemisia  vulgaris)  and  Pale  Swallow-­‐wort  (Vincetoxicum  rossicum).  Plant  and  Soil,  277(1-­‐2),  53–69.      

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This  project  was  made  possible  with  funding  from  the  Wildlife  Conserva/on  Society-­‐Na/onal  Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administra/on,  Lower  Bronx  River  Partnership.  Brian  Aucoin,  Ka/e  Conrad,  Anthony  Copioli,  Erica  DeLuca,  Chris  Ekstrom,  Elaine  Feliciano,  Valerie  Francis,  Francesca  Giordano,  Jennifer  Greenfeld,  Anne  Hunter,  Frances  Knickmeyer,  Kathy  Lee,  Penny  Maca,  Michael  Mendez,  Ellen  Pehek,  Adam  Thornbrough,  Ferdie  Yau.    Numerous  Volunteers,  Interns,  and  Students.  

 

               The  Bronx  River  extends  23  miles,  star/ng  in  Valhalla,  New  York,  and  flowing  through  Westchester  and  the  Bronx  into  the  East  River.  The  river  has  been  heavily  impacted  in  the  past  200  years  by  dams,  railroads,  industry,  road  construc/on,  and  urbaniza/on.  These  impacts  have  greatly  disturbed  and  altered  the  river’s  ecosystems  and  made  the  river  suscep/ble  to  invasion  by  Japanese  knotweed,  which  is  now  widely  distributed  along  the  banks  of  the  river.                  Japanese  knotweed  is  in  a  perennial  clonal  plant  species  that  originates  from  East  Asia.  It  was  first  introduced  in  the  U.S.  as  an  ornamental  garden  plant  and  has  since  spread.  It  has  large  stems  that  can  reach  lengths  of  over  5  meters  and  it  primarily  expands  through  rhizome  growth  or  rhizome  fragment  dispersal.  Rhizomes  can  grow  over  1  meter  below  the  surface,  can  extend  over  10  meters  in  length,  are  coarse  and  do  not  stabilize  banks  as  well  as  fine  rooted  na/ve  woody  and  herbaceous  plants.  This  species  degrades  the  structure  and  func/on  of  the  riparian  zone  by  forming  dense  monocultures  that  reduce  the  regenera/on  of  na/ve  plant  species  and  promote  eroded,  steep  banks.  Dense  stands  of  knotweed  lower  not  only  plant,  but  animal  diversity  in  the  system  by  reducing  habitat  provided  by  large  woody  species  which  create  in-­‐stream  cover  for  organisms.                    Invasive  species  management  is  of  high  importance  to  the  preserva/on  of  the  limited  remaining  natural  riparian  habitats  along  the  Bronx  River.  The  NYC  Parks  Natural  Resource  Group,  in  collabora/on  with  the  Bronx  River  Alliance  and  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden,  built  upon  the  2006  Ecological  and  Restora/on  and  Management  Plan  for  the  Bronx  River,  with  the  Riparian  Invasive  Plant  Management  Plan  in  2012.  This  plan  outlined  management  goals  for  curbing  invasive  species  in  riparian  zones  and  emphasized  Japanese  knotweed  control.    This  study  was  conceived  based  on  the  need  for  knotweed  management  and  it  serves  to  contribute  more  knowledge  and  data  on  the  effec/veness  of  different  management  techniques.  

1Ecology,  Evolu/on,  and  Environmental  Biology,  Columbia  University,  2The  New  York  Botanical  Garden,  3NYC  Parks  and  Recrea/on  Natural  Resources  Group,  4Bronx  River  Alliance  

Christopher  A.  Haight1,  Jessica  A.  Schuler2,  Kathleen  McCarthy3,  Sarah  Lumban  Tobing3,  Robin  Kriesberg4,  Marit  Larson3,Machew  Palmer1  

Japanese  Knotweed  Management  in  the  Riparian  Zone  of  the  Bronx  River:  The  effect  of  different  removal  techniques  on  sapling  growth  and  the  herbaceous  layer  

METHODS  1.  120,  2m  x  2m  plots  along  knotweed-­‐dominated  banks  of  the  river:  

•  60  plots  in  The  Bronx  River  Forest  

•  60  plots  in  The  New  York  Botanical  Garden    

2.  Planted  a  container-­‐size  pin  oak  sapling  in  the  center  of  each  plot  in  

April  2010.  

3.  Three  treatment  types:  

1.  Cut  3  /mes/year  (June,  July,  September)  

2.  Cut  1  /me/year  (June)  and  grub  2  /mes/year  (July,  

September)  

3.    Control  (no  treatment)  

4.  Treatment  years  

1.  Bronx  River  Forest,  2010-­‐2012.  

2.  NYBG,  2010-­‐2013  and  beyond.  

5.  Plot  monitoring  in  September  every  year  before  final  treatments.  

CuYng  Plot                                                              Root  Removal  Plot                                                                  Control  Plot    

Japanese  Knotweed  

Pin  Oak    

Herbaceous  Layer  

CONCLUSION  

The  Bronx  River   CuYng  and  grubbing  plots  on  the  Bronx  River  in  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden  

•  CuYng  and  root/rhizome  removal  are  equally  effec/ve  •  Mechanical  removals  reduce  knotweed  height,  but  have  no  

effect  on  stem  density  •  Oak  saplings  have  more  rapid  growth  and  higher  survival  in  

knotweed-­‐removal  plots  •  Knotweed  rapidly  recovers  in  the  removal  plots,  and  the  

growth  of  other  species  is  limited  

Year - NY Botanical Garden

Kno

twee

d S

tem

Cou

nt

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

020

4060

80100

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

020

4060

80100

Year - NY Botanical Garden

Kno

twee

d S

tem

Hei

ght (

cm)

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

030

6090

120

160

200

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

030

6090

120

160

200

Year - NY Botanical Garden

Pin

Oak

Ste

m D

iam

eter

(cm

)

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

Year - NY Botanical GardenP

in O

ak H

eigh

t (cm

)

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

100120140160180200220

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

100120140160180200220

Year - NY Botanical Garden

Pin

Oak

Per

cent

Sur

viva

l

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

3040

5060

7080

90

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

3040

5060

7080

90

Year - NY Botanical Garden

Spe

cies

Ric

hnes

s

Cutting - NYBGGrubbing - NYBGControl - NYBG

2010 2011 2012

05

1015

20

Year - Bronx River Forest

Cutting - BRFGrubbing - BRFControl - BRF

2010 2011 2012

05

1015

20