Upload
trinhmien
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
[1]
This action is funded by the European Union
ANNEX 2
of the Commission Decision on the Annual Action Programme in favour of Zambia to be
financed from the 11th European Development Fund
Action Document for the "Performance Enhancement Programme for the Ministry of
Agriculture and Livestock for Better Service Delivery to Farmers"
1. Title/basic act/
CRIS number
Performance Enhancement Programme for the Ministry of Agriculture
and Livestock for Better Service Delivery to Farmers
CRIS number: ZM/FED/037-359
2. Zone benefiting
from the
action/location
Southern Africa and Indian Ocean, Zambia
The action shall be carried out at the following location: selected
districts in Zambia with the Team Leader and Project Support Unit
based in Lusaka.
3. Programming
document National Indicative Programme (2014-2020) for Zambia
4. Sector of
concentration/
thematic area
Reduced rural poverty and improved livelihoods
5. Amounts
concerned Total estimated cost: EUR 10 000 000
Total EU contribution EUR 10 000 000 (A envelope)
6. Aid
modality(ies)
and
implementation
modality(ies)
Project Modality
Indirect management with the Republic of Zambia
7. DAC code(s) 311 AGRICULTURE
31120 Agricultural development
31166 Agricultural extension
31181 Agricultural education / training
31182 Agricultural research
122 BASIC HEALTH
12240 Basic Nutrition
[2]
8. Markers (from
CRIS DAC form)
General policy objective Not
targeted
Significant
objective
Main
objective
Participation development/good
governance ☐ ☐ ☒
Aid to environment ☒ ☐ ☐
Gender equality (including Women
In Development) ☒ ☐ ☐
Trade Development ☒ ☐ ☐
Reproductive, Maternal, New born
and child health ☒ ☐ ☐
RIO Convention markers Not
targeted
Significant
objective
Main
objective
Biological diversity ☒ ☐ ☐
Combat desertification ☒ ☐ ☐
Climate change mitigation ☒ ☐ ☐
Climate change adaptation ☒ ☐ ☐
9. Global Public
Goods and
Challenges (GPGC)
thematic flagships
n/a
SUMMARY
The overall objective of this project is to support the Government of Zambia's policy
objective of achieving an inclusive, agriculture-led economic growth by helping the
smallholder farming sector successfully transition from low productivity, subsistence-based
agriculture to more profitable market-oriented production systems. Therefore, this project
aims at strengthening the capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAL) for
provision of quality public services to small-scale farmers in extension services, research and
nutrition. This is in line with the increasing recognition that the Government, through public
services needs to actively contribute to "supporting the development of a sustainable,
dynamic, diversified and competitive agricultural sector that assures food and nutrition
security at household and national levels".
Under the three results areas, the strategic core functions of the Ministry will be strengthened.
To strengthen better service delivery, the use of evidence in policy making, planning and
budgeting, will be supported and the capacity of the Ministry's staff will be enhanced to
ensure that extension services are delivered in a manner that contributes to increased
productivity and improved food and nutrition security in small scale farming households. The
vital role of agriculture in addressing nutrition outcomes will be strengthened by better
strategic planning and mainstreaming of nutrition to agricultural services at front line.
[3]
1 CONTEXT
1.1 Sector/Country/Regional context/Thematic area
1.1.1 Public Policy Assessment and EU Policy Framework
Economic and social situation and poverty analysis
In the recent past, Zambia has achieved significant Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth
rising from -2 in 1975 and 1995, averaging between 5 and 7% per annum since 2001 and
reaching 6.7% in 2013. This impressive positive growth has been driven primarily by high
global copper prices and investments in sectors such as construction, telecommunications,
retail and manufacturing. The rebasing of national accounts shows that the Zambian economy
is actually bigger than earlier estimated and Zambia is now presented as a more service-
oriented economy. Key macro-economic indicators have improved including inflation that has
been in the single digits since 2009. Despite good prospects for a strong economic growth rate
(6.5% in 2014), significant vulnerabilities remain, mainly on account of inflationary
pressures, caused by the depreciation of the kwacha, as well as an important budget deficit
caused by an expansionary fiscal policy in 2012 and 2013.
Further, developments which have made Zambia reach middle-income status in 2011 and
have placed the country among the world’s top 10 fastest growing economies, have not
translated into commensurate development gains for the largest share of the population.
Overall, despite significant improvements in urban poverty reduction, poverty remains an
acute problem with the aggregate poverty levels at 60.5%. Although significant improvements
have been made in reducing urban poverty, poverty levels for the rural population who make
up the majority of the country's population have remained an acute problem with poverty
levels at more than 77% per cent for more than a decade. In addition, extreme poverty is most
prevalent in the rural areas with a rate of 57.7%, which is four times higher than urban
extreme poverty (13.1%). The gap between urban and rural poverty continues to widen. With
a Gini index of 57.5 in 2010, Zambia is among the countries with the highest income
inequality in the world. Indeed, 60.5% of the people of Zambia live below the poverty line in
2010 and those living in extreme poverty account for 42.3% at national level and for 58% in
the rural areas.
The preliminary results from the 2013/14 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS)
shows a significant reduction in infant mortality (IMR) from 70 deaths per 1000 live births in
2007 to 45 in 2013/14 and in under-five mortality (U5MR) from 119 deaths in 2007 to 75 in
2013/14. This clearly shows that Zambia is on course to achieve the Millennium Development
Goal (MDG) on IMR and U5MR. Under-five nutrition, however, still remains a development
challenge for Zambia. The preliminary results from the 2013/14 ZDHS shows that there was a
marginal reduction in stunting from 45% in 2007 to 40% in 2013/14 while the percentage of
children underweight remained static at 15%. The high prevalence of stunting is well above
the average in sub-Saharan Africa and is affecting Zambia’s potential to meet economic and
development targets because it has long-lasting irreversible effects on a child’s development,
including mental development, health, school performance and ultimately work productivity .
National development policy
Government development priorities are framed by the vision of “a prosperous middle-income
nation by 2030” that “provides opportunities for improving the well-being of all”. This theme
is echoed in the ruling party's manifesto (2011-2016) that advocates for “a better Zambia for
all” and in the revised Sixth National Development Plan (R-SNDP) 2013-2016, which aims
[4]
“to accelerate growth further and to make it more relevant to improving the livelihood of the
Zambian people, especially in rural areas”.
Given that about 80% of the population depends on agriculture as their main source of
livelihood, the agricultural sector has the greatest potential to significantly impact the
Government’s poverty reduction aspirations and to achieve increased economic
diversification outside mining. This policy shift to refocus the agricultural sector’s
development strategies and programmes towards drivers of pro-poor agricultural growth is at
the core of the draft National Agriculture Policy (NAP) and the National Agriculture
Investment Plan (NAIP) 2014-2018 under the Comprehensive African Agriculture
Development Programme (CAADP).
The NAP and the Agricultural Sector Chapter of the R-SNDP acknowledge that to achieve
this goal the Government must focus on providing public goods that are indispensable to
creating broad-based and inclusive agricultural growth such as agricultural research, effective
agricultural extension services, control of pests and diseases of national importance, and the
development of basic rural infrastructure. Vision 2030 and the NAP also recognise as key the
"gender responsive sustainable development" of the agriculture sector with an emphasis on
women empowerment. In line with Government policy that agricultural development should
be private sector driven, the role of the Government will therefore be confined to policy
formulation, strategic planning, enforcement of legislation, regulation and inspection, and
monitoring and evaluation of overall sector performance while the private sector will play a
dominant role in driving the development agenda of the agricultural sector including input
supply, farm mechanisation, irrigation development, output marketing and agro-processing.
Sector context: policies and challenges
Despite the sector policy framework that identifies and documents the immediate and long-
term causes for the agricultural sector’s poor performance, the strategic areas of intervention
and the respective roles to be played by the public and private sectors, there is still a gap
between stated policy intentions and their realisation. Although budgetary allocations to the
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock have increased during the last seven years, they remain
below the recommended CAADP minimum of 10% and expenditure remains overwhelmingly
driven by the Government’s maize purchases through the Food Reserve Agency (FRA) and
input subsidies under the Farmer Input Support Programme (FISP). These maize subsidy
programmes consumed 52% of the 2014 agriculture budget, and much more if considering
extra-budgetary and/or supplemental funding. Emphasis on the two programmes diverts
resources from critical programmes with potential to contribute to the desired growth in the
agricultural sector such as irrigation development, extension service delivery and research
while crowding out the private sector. The need to establish a better balance between the
maize driven policies and those promoting diversification and alternative agricultural
production methods is subject of regular policy and political dialogue between the authorities
and cooperating partners.
Under-nutrition faces similar constraints. On the one hand it has become more prominent on
the country’s policy agenda with several widely acknowledged achievements including major
presidential commitments made at the London Nutrition for All Summit in June 2013 and the
development of the 2011-2015 National Food and Nutrition Strategic Plan (NFNSP), founded
in the 2006 National Food and Nutrition Policy. On the other hand, even if the NFNSP,
developed through a consultative process, has provided a common multi-sectoral framework,
implementation has been slow. Similarly, little progress has been achieved with the London
pledges. As a result, addressing malnutrition through nutrition sensitive interventions in
Zambia still requires significant attention and resources.
[5]
The high expenditure on subsidy programmes and inadequate expenditure on key reforms
reflect the challenge posed by the lack of consistency between stated policies and
implementation as well as the weak links between planning, budgeting and expenditure. The
underperformance of the agricultural sector is also linked to institutional weaknesses and
organisational constraints that prevent MAL from delivering on its core functions such as
extension and research, directly affecting farmers' productivity and undermining the potential
role of the private sector.
1.1.2 Stakeholder analysis
The main stakeholders of the project are Zambian farmers, MAL and the NFNC. Within the
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, the proposed project will pay specific attention to its
following branches: i) Department of Human Resource and Administration, responsible inter
alia for staff recruitment and management as well as for the revision and development of
training curricula; ii) Department of Policy and Planning, the key counterpart to the project in
MAL coordinates the development of an integrated M&E system for MAL, is in charge of
policy, planning and budgeting functions as well the annual crop forecast and post-harvest
surveys; iii) Department of Agriculture (DoA) in charge of promotion of crop diversification,
sustainable use of agricultural land, water management, yield improvement practices, food
processing and utilisation at household level as well as extension service delivery
strengthening. The Food and Nutrition Unit is under the DoA; iv) Department of Livestock
Development, in charge of enhancing livestock production and productivity through notably
the provision of extension services by a network of Livestock Assistants, v) Department of
Fisheries, responsible for promoting increased sustainable fish production through capture
fisheries and aquaculture, productivity and value-addition and to this end prepared to employ
more extension and research staff; vi) Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI),
responsible for developing crop varieties, issuing plant import permits and phytosanitary
certificates and carrying out inspections (of farms, nurseries, fields, etc) to prevent new plant
pest and diseases from entering the country. ZARI working in collaboration with DoA will
develop and enhance Research – Extension linkages; and vii) Department of Veterinary
Services, in charge of enhancing livestock health through the development and
implementation sustainable disease and vector control strategies, through notably the
provision of extension services by a network of Veterinary Assistants.
Around 75% of Zambians in the agricultural sector are smallholder farmers who grow staple
food for subsistence and at times, in modest quantities, for the market. They are traditionally
undercapitalised, make limited use of equipment, irrigation, improved seed, or appropriate
fertiliser, and operate largely away from the nation’s transport systems. A second economy
consists of medium-sized and large commercial farms that are capital-intensive and enjoy
relatively easy access to credit and other financial services. These two communities require
different, appropriately adaptive approaches to reform. Subsistence farmers need “meaningful
extension services that will help them diversify, access to appropriate financial products and
capacity-building in trading and processing activities” while commercial farmers require less
government intrusion into agricultural markets, smoother systems of regional and
international trade, and more effective and transparent public-private partnerships1”. Despite a
focus on smallholders, the proposed project will support MAL to better meet the needs of the
farming community as a whole as per its core service delivery mandate.
1 See AgCLIR: ZAMBIA Legal and institutional reform in Zambia’s Agricultural Sector, USAID, February 2011
[6]
The National Food and Nutrition Commission (NFNC) was established as a statutory body
by the Government of Zambia in 1967 and was reactivated in 2011 to raise awareness on
nutrition and integrate nutrition across government services and interventions. Consequently,
the NFNC should be the direct counterpart of the Food and Nutrition Unit of MAL.
1.1.3 Priority areas for support/problem analysis
The proposed project aims to address some of the following challenges:
Limited technical capacity of officers: There are a number of Agricultural Training
Institutions under the auspices of MAL that offer diploma and certificate courses, in-service
training for extension staff, practical training for farmers in improved farm practices, and
higher level training to progressive (lead) farmers. There has been no systematic upgrading of
the curricula of these institutions to meet the current demands of the sector and little attention
has been paid to institutional management and training methodology for their teaching and
management staff. The practice of in-service refresher training has collapsed preventing
technical staff from regularly updating their knowledge and skills, and leading to a gradual
decline in quality service delivery and customer service. This area is however attracting
growing interest from both the Government and Cooperating Partners (CPs) and initial steps
have been made with EU support to re-invigorate induction and in-service training.
Ineffective Human Resources (HR) management: For the Ministry to efficiently deliver on
its mandate on the basis of a technical and administrative human resources establishment of
11,349, a solid HR management system is needed to: appropriately manage staff recruitment,
selection and placement including promotions and transfers, payroll as well as skills needs
assessment and training delivery. However, challenges persist including the low quality of
human capital due to insufficient staff skills development (see above), inadequate staffing
levels with only about half of existing positions being effectively filled and lack of incentives
especially at the block and camp levels, all resulting in demotivation and high staff turnover.
Weak synergies between departments lead to poor coordination and delayed collective action.
However, progress is being achieved notably under the Performance Enhancement
Programme (PEP) with the development of a HR database as a first step towards the
establishment of a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) connected with the Cabinet's
Payroll Management and Establishment Control (PMEC) and the conduct of several trainings
for HR staff based on a skills audit.
Weak extension services: The provision of agricultural extension services represents the
critical front line output of MAL. The extension officer to farmer ratio in Zambia was found
to be 1:900 in 2011, which falls short of the recommended level of 1:400. This situation is
further aggravated by outdated technical knowledge among extension officers and insufficient
requisite equipment needed go into the field to conduct trials and demonstrations with
farmers. Moreover, extension cannot function properly without a continuous flow of
appropriate innovations through strong linkages with research, which are currently weak.
However, progress is being made with the support of the Japanese Government and the EU to
develop a National Agriculture Extension Strategy. Sustained efforts in innovation and
implementation are required to achieve wide impact and to reverse the current situation.
Inadequate contribution and dissemination of research: Despite wide recognition of the
importance of investing in research to identify and introduce to farmers technologies that can
increase crop productivity, prevent and control diseases of national economic importance or
help Zambia’s farming community to become more resilient to climatic variability and
climatic change, spending on agricultural research has experienced a downward trend for the
past decades. As a result, a number of government research programmes are no longer being
[7]
carried out due to a lack of adequate resources and trained personnel. However, in recent
years successful joint ventures between Zambian and international research centres have been
supported by Cooperating Partners leading to revitalisation and diversification of research
outside maize production. A mechanism to allow for needed interlinkages between
agricultural vocational training, extension and research is needed as a significant body of
research findings have remained dormant.
Weak monitoring, evaluation and information management systems: MAL has an Early
Warning Unit which generates quality statistics on crop production and input utilisation by
the farmers through the Crop Forecast (CFS) and Post-harvest (PHS) Surveys. The main
challenge faced within the unit is the limited capacity to analyse and interpret the wealth of
statistics generated into various M&E products that can inform policy formulation, investment
planning and decision making. Further, MAL has operated over the years without an
integrated sector-wide M&E system which resulted in fragmentation in the M&E approach.
However, in 2012, MAL embarked on developing an integrated sector-wide M&E system.
Key milestones met so far include the development of an M&E manual with a set of results-
based indicators that has been field-tested and will start being rolled out in 2015. To oversee
the implementation of the sector-wide M&E system, an M&E Technical Working Group was
established. Further, an M&E Coordinating Group has recently been set up under the
Ministry's leadership with the Cooperating Partners involved in supporting M&E, with a view
to avoiding duplications and parallel systems.
Underdeveloped nutrition mainstreaming capacity: Although Zambia is seen as having
"medium" nutrition governance (WHO 2009), it has very high stunting levels of children and
the highest prevalence of undernourishment in Africa. Hardly any improvement has been seen
over the past twenty years. A recent analysis highlights the main reasons for this scenario to
include weak inter-sectoral collaboration around nutrition that is due to (i) a lack of highly
qualified staff to accelerate nutrition actions in various sectors and at all levels; (ii) limited
mandate of the National Food and Nutrition Commission (NFNC) to convene high level
actors; and (iii) insufficient funding for nutrition activities by the government. The Food and
Nutrition Unit of MAL is both under-capacitated and disempowered to effectively influence
the Ministry's development plans and programmes. The agricultural extension services are
also poorly capacitated by nutrition officers and nutrition is not sufficiently integrated into
their training. Nutrition is not reflected either in the Ministry's training curricula or in its
extension and research programmes or M&E systems.
2 RISKS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Risks Risk
level
(H/M/L)
Mitigating measures
The Government of Zambia fails to
remain consistent with its policy
commitments. This would certainly
highly jeopardise the expected
results/wide impact of ongoing
development projects.
M Use of CP-coordinated policy dialogue
with Government to help the latter to
ensure the required minimum level of
policy consistency and predictability.
The data and knowledge base
resulting from strengthened
research and M&E systems are not
M Use of CP-coordinated political and
technical dialogue with Government to
steer the policy change process towards
[8]
being used towards better evidence-
based policy making.
needed reforms as evidenced through both
research and M&E.
Use of CPs partnerships with civil society
organisations and non-state actors to
strengthen the demand for inclusive
delivery of services.
Uncoordinated actions among the
12 CPs actively involved in
agriculture support in Zambia could
result in wasting resources due to
duplications, counter-productive
inconsistencies in agricultural
development approaches and loss
of credibility in policy dialogue
with Government.
L The Agriculture CP Group is an efficient
tool for information exchange and
consensus building among CPs relating to
policy dialogue with Government.
Assumptions
Zambia’s political situation remains stable allowing for the economy to continue
growing on the basis of sound macro-economic policies pursued by the Government.
Agriculture and food and nutrition security continue attracting strong political attention
and commitment in the country.
There is adequate ownership of the reforms and changes advocated by the proposed
project in the Ministry both at central and local levels.
3 LESSONS LEARNT, COMPLEMENTARITY AND CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
3.1 Lessons learnt
The Cooperating Partners have committed to support together the sector development with
resources made available up to USD 700 million over the period 2014-2018. Given the
difficult policy environment, most support is managed outside of the public sector, and only
3% of this financial envelope is to be spent on issues related to Pillar 6 "Institutional
Strengthening" of the National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP) 2014-2018.
The ongoing PEP, funded by the EU under the 10th
EDF for a total budget of EUR 8 900 000,
is one of the few interventions aimed at providing capacity development and institutional
strengthening to the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock. In its third year of
implementation, the programmes mid-term evaluation has provided the following lessons that
have been capitalised upon to formulate the proposed project: clear definition of the changes
that are to be achieved is necessary for a good programme design, yet application of
flexibility in the face of changing circumstances and priorities seems to be key to addressing
key constraints.
While recognising the political economy which dictates that maize is the main staple food in
Zambia and shall remain the key political factor in determining agricultural policies over the
years to come, the PEP programme and the ongoing programme Scaling Up Conservation
Agriculture (CASU) show that MAL is paying more attention to alternative policies. In this
regard, the support provided under PEP to cost-efficiently update the farmers' register in 36
districts has been critical to raise the interest of the Minister of Agriculture in the e-voucher-
based distribution of inputs. Its potential application under the Farmers Input Support
Programme could pave the way for a system that would leave more space for an engagement
of the private sector. Through the CASU programme, the Ministry's extension workers are
[9]
promoting diversification and crop rotation, applying more efficient and more
environmentally friendly cultivation practices.
A further strengthening of the technical capacity of the Ministry will contribute to instilling a
culture of change and developing associated systems at all levels. Finally, strengthening the
service delivery of the Ministry may contribute to raising small-holder farmers' traditions and
demands, which could ultimately have a transformational effect leading to or facilitating
further policy changes.
The Change Management Teams established at central and provincial levels need to be further
strengthened in order to have impact at service delivery. Key achievements under PEP
recommended for further support: the upgrading of MAL's ICT systems, the strengthening of
induction and in-service training, and the completion and implementation of a solid M&E
system.
3.2 Complementarity, synergy and donor coordination
The European Union is funding under the 10th
EDF the EUR 8 900 000 Agriculture Sector
Performance Enhancement Programme (PEP) that aims at strengthening the capacity of the
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock to enable it “to create a conducive environment and
deliver appropriate services to spur agricultural growth”. The Programme focuses on 4 results
towards 1) “change management and service delivery improved”; 2) “sector policy, planning
and financial management improved”; 3) “human resources management and ICT
strengthened” and 4) “monitoring and evaluation systems improved”. The proposed project
intends to consolidate and/or develop further several achievements obtained under PEP. It
also supports the EUR 11 100 000 Conservation Agriculture Scaling Up Project (2013–
2017) that aims at rolling out conservation agriculture in 48 districts by resorting to the
Ministry's block and camp extension officers and the recently developed pool of Master
Trainers to promote the technology at stake.
The 10th
th EDF Support Programme to Public Finance Management, Accountability and
Statistics includes a component (EUR 3 300 000) aimed at improving Government effective
monitoring, evaluation (M&E) and measurement of performance of the national development
plan and specific sector plans. Support for the development of a government-wide MIS
system is provided in partnership with Germany and the UK and activities include setting-up
an effective management information system at central and sectoral level in selected
ministries including the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock.
Other Cooperating Partners offer support for the sector, with a wide variety of
interventions, instruments and objectives. The key initiatives aiming at supporting capacity
building and institutional strengthening of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, with
potential links to the proposed action, are described below.
The Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA) supports the Rural Extension
Service Capacity Advancement Project (RESCAP) (2009-2014/ USD 18.9 million) enhancing
the quality of the extension services provided by the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock.
Synergies have been built with the PEP notably in relation with the harmonisation of
extension services across the country, the design and implementation of management training
and the reinstatement of induction and in-service training.
The International Fund for Agricultural Development is supporting the Smallholder
Productivity Promotion Programme (SAPP) (2010-2017 / USD 24.6 million) addressing the
MAL policy focus of private sector driven growth based on improved productivity of the
small-scale sector. Coordination has been ensured with PEP through an agreement to
[10]
cooperate in field testing and rolling out of an M&E Manual for the Ministry, and both
projects would share the responsibility for training relevant staff of the Ministry at central and
decentralised levels.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is supporting the
Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock to develop and implement with the assistance of the
Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System for Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-
SA) a monitoring and evaluation framework to track the implementation and subsequent
impacts of all key agricultural strategies’ and policies’ targets focusing on the Comprehensive
Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Under the Feed the Future
Programme, USAID works with international agricultural research centres to build the
capacity of Zambia’s national agriculture research institutions and promote adoption of
improved crop varieties and low cost technologies for small scale farmers. The research
programmes, amounting to USD 18 million, focus on areas related to this intervention, such
as nutrition, more specifically bio-fortified crops and aflatoxins mitigation.
The World Bank is also supporting research in Zambia, Mozambique and Malawi under a
regional project funded through a USD 90 million credit line. The "Agricultural Productivity
Programme for Southern Africa (APPSA)" (2013-2019) seeks to improve technology
generation and dissemination within and among participating countries by building capacity
within national research and development systems and enhancing regional collaboration.
Investments in Zambia will focus on the Zambia Agriculture Research Institute research
stations that carry out research on food legumes. Support will also be provided to the Ministry
of Agriculture and Livestock to strengthen technology dissemination capacity, and to the
Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust (GART) to build capacity for research on cereals
grown.
With a 50% grant from the Government of the Netherlands, the Government of Zambia is
preparing a project for the Upgrading and Rehabilitation of Education Infrastructure of
Agriculture Colleges in Zambia (EUR 24 200 000). This project seeks to ensure that small-
scale farmers, youth and extension officers have access to quality agriculture practical
vocational education through the implementation of infrastructure improvements, renovation
works, provision of equipment, curricula development, technical assistance and training, and
the subsequent operation and maintenance of the 10 existing colleges in Zambia.
As per the division of labour agreed upon in Joint Assistant Strategy for Zambia (JASZ) II, 12
Cooperating Partners are supporting the agricultural sector in Zambia. They form the
Agriculture Cooperating Partners Group, established as a coordinating and dialogue forum
towards increased concentration and rationalisation of efforts in both geographical and sector
terms, as well as to enhance national ownership. Three members of the group are selected on
a rotational and yearly basis to form the "Troika", which meets with the Ministry of
Agriculture and Livestock, coordinates Cooperating Partners’ inputs into government policy
and facilitates support for implementation of national policies. The EU has very recently
handed over the chair of the Agricultural Cooperating Partners Group but remains an active
member of it and is a member of the Agriculture M&E group. Finally, the EU takes an active
part in the Nutrition Cooperating Partners Group under the Health Sector Group. At project
implementation level close coordination will be ensured with the Government of Finland,
IFAD and the World Bank (M&E), JICA (agricultural extension), USAID (research) and the
Government of the Netherlands (agricultural training institutions).
[11]
3.3 Cross-cutting issues
The proposed project will address: i) Implementation of the MAL Gender Guidelines ii)
Climate change: the agricultural sector is challenged by the impact of climate change that
translates itself into recurrent and intensifying droughts, waterlogging, seasonal floods, long
dry spells and poor rainfall distribution. Climate resilient, agricultural practices such as
conservation agriculture and technologies will be promoted to reduce the vulnerability of rural
livelihoods; iii) Environmental sustainability: unsustainable farming practices, use of wood
fuel and over-exploitation of forests are contributors to environmental degradation leading to
low agricultural production and productivity. Relevant mitigation strategies will be promoted;
and iv) HIV/AIDS: HIV/AIDS prevalence in Zambia is among the highest worldwide and
affects an estimated 14% of the productive age (15–49 years) group including the Ministry’s
workforce and farmers leading to decreased productivity and incomes. HIV/AIDS
sensitisation within the Ministry at all levels has been promoted under PEP. This will
continue under the proposed project.
4 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION
4.1 Objectives/results
The Overall Objective is to support the Government of Zambia's policy objective to reduce
rural poverty and enhance food and nutrition security.
The Project Purpose is to improve the capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock
to deliver quality services to smallholder farmers towards increased productivity and
enhanced diversity of Zambia's agricultural sector.
These objectives are in line with outcomes 1 and 2 of the “reduced rural poverty and
improved livelihoods” section in the National Indicative Programme (2014–2020) for
Zambia.
The project will focus on the following three result areas:
1. Improved use of evidence for policy making, planning and budgeting in MAL
underpinning service delivery to rural households;
2. Enhanced capacity of MAL staff to coordinate and provide extension services that
contribute to increased productivity and improved food/nutrition security in small scale
farming households;
3. Increased dietary diversity of women and children in poor rural households through more
effective nutrition-sensitive farmer extension and services facilitated by MAL.
These results have been formulated with the aim to target key areas where change is deemed
necessary and where tangible results can be achieved within the lifetime of the intervention to
both strengthen the institutional capacity of MAL and to improve smallholder farmers’
livelihoods and nutrition security. For each of the three results preliminary areas of
intervention have been formulated.
4.2 Main activities
Activity Area 1.1 Policy formulation and analysis; and legislative reforms
Support will be provided to continue the undertaking of policy studies and dissemination of
policy briefs as well as for reviewing, evaluating and developing agricultural policy
documents and related legislative instruments. Capacity building in policy formulation and
analysis will be continued.
[12]
Activity Area 1.2 Strengthening of Planning and Budgeting standards and tools
Following the development of Government’s Planning and Budgeting standards, MAL will be
supported in strengthening planning and budgeting standards and tools. This will include
training for selected staff of the Policy and Planning Department in budget development,
analysis and the management of the budget database. In addition, selected staff from the
Department of Policy and Planning and the Department of Human Resources and
Administration will be trained in manpower planning, currently not addressed systematically
during the planning and budgeting process.
Activity Area 1.3 Development and strengthening of the Ministry's Farmer
Registration, M&E, Agriculture Statistics and Early Warning Systems
A new harmonised M&E Manual encompassing the key functions of MAL has been
developed and is being followed up with training of M&E officers at MAL Headquarters,
Provincial and District level in results-based M&E. In this programme, MAL will be
supported in developing and testing systems that will ensure continued tools development and
training of staff in results-based M&E at service delivery levels, including strengthening the
link between camp level staff collecting data and the technical support from their provincial
and district M&E staff. The operationalisation of the MAL M&E system will need to be
complemented with the design and implementation of the M&E database that will host the
information on all indicators in the M&E Manual and in turn the database of MAL will need
to be linked up to the Government-wide M&E system under development.
The rolling out of the Farmer Registration will be further supported and developed to ensure
cost effective and continuous updating and use of the information. In provinces where farmer
registration has been completed, the programme will support the development of the
methodology and implementing re-demarcation and harmonisation of Crops, Livestock and
Fisheries camps in order to ensure effective, coordinated and unified extension delivery in
Crops (agriculture), Livestock and fisheries camps, in line with R-SNDP and the NAIP. The
Ministry's Agricultural Statistics and Early Warning Section will be supported to develop
analytical capacity to more fully utilise the data from the crop forecast and post-harvest
surveys for poverty and food security analyses. The monitoring of the MAL gender guidelines
will be supported.
In addition to designing training systems in the information processes and data collection
processes, design and acquisition of relevant ICT based, modernised tools will be supported.
Activity Area 1.4 Strengthening Change Management
The Change Management Teams (CMTs) established at central, provincial and district levels
will be supported in further defining their role and holding of regular CMT meetings,
including continued support to the change management process as well as strengthening
cross-sectorial collaboration notably in nutrition. This will include the development of change
management materials as issues evolve at the implementation level, designing training in
leadership and management focusing on the district level staff and strengthening the
application of the Annual Performance Appraisal System (APAS) at all levels of the sector as
a tool for human resources management.
Activity Area 2.1 Strengthen extension management
MAL is developing a National Agricultural Extension Strategy (NAES) and “General
Operational Guidelines for Agricultural Extension Service Providers for Small-Scale Farmers
in Zambia”. Once finalised and distributed to the Ministry's staff and other extension service
providers across the country, initial and continuous systems will be developed to
[13]
operationalise the guidelines. Support will be provided to develop and provide extension
officers with handbooks and manuals on how to strengthen the management of crops,
livestock, fisheries and animal health. This support will include the use of web-based
extension material and the respective Ministry's departments will be assisted in making
recommendations and training materials available in electronic form and accessible via the
Ministry's website. Support will be provided for strengthening extension management and
enhancing inter-departmental coordination of extension delivery, across the MAL District
Agricultural Committees (DACs) will be reinvigorated to provide a multi-stakeholder forum
at this level.
Activity Area 2.2 Institutionalise joint research-extension planning and strengthened
dissemination
Enhancement of linkages between research and extension, one of the measures stipulated in
the National Agricultural Policy (NAP) and the NAES, will be supported. Innovation on
integrated dissemination mechanisms and building on tested tools for dissemination will be
supported by joint research-extension planning and linked to the systematic training
provision, which include dissemination of research findings, particularly for extension staff.
Where possible the use of ICT will be developed. Additionally, support will be provided to
promote the use of local innovations at farm level on improved livestock productivity, and
inventorisation, characterisation, conservation and sustainable utilisation of indigenous animal
genetic resources.
Activity Area 2.3 Strengthening training provision for MAL staff
Support will be provided to the Ministry's Department of Human Resources and
Administration in order to continue institutionalising the Induction Training Programme for
all new entrants to the Ministry and initiating a Ministry's in-service training programme on
the basis of a thorough training needs assessment of frontline staff. All departments of MAL
will be covered, with a view to introducing innovative technologies and appropriate extension
techniques for effective adoption of improved technologies by small scale farmers.
The cadre of Master Trainers will be sustained and utilised for in-service training activities. In
addition, the programme will collaborate with a project to be co-funded by the Government of
Zambia and the Government of the Netherlands to ensure that training needs identified at
local level and research findings are incorporated into the Agricultural Training Institutions'
staff development and curriculum development programmes.
The Agricultural Training Institutes will be supported in revising curriculum and developing
practical up-dating courses. Staff in-service training records will be continuously updated in
the Human Resource Information System developed under the PEP by the Training Section of
the Department of Human Resources and Administration.
Activity Area 3.1 Position Food and Nutrition Security (FNS) within MAL for more
nutrition-sensitive services and policies across MAL with strengthened direction and
technical capacity
A capacity assessment of Food and Nutrition management will be undertaken with respect to
defining a new mandate, role and strategy within the Ministry and to determine where
capacities and skills need strengthening. Training and technical assistance will be identified to
define and support the new role and functions, including identifying the required additional
human, material and financial resources required.
[14]
Mainstreaming of nutrition-sensitive services across relevant Departments of the Ministry and
MAL representation in multi-sectoral platforms on nutrition convened under the framework of
the National Food & Nutrition Strategic plan (2011 -2015), will be supported. Assistance will
be provided to the newly established MAL Nutrition Technical Working Group (inter-
departmental) as a platform to discuss the strengthening of links between agriculture and
nutrition, including encouraging participation of other sector ministries and development
partners, where the agenda would benefit from experiences and lessons learnt beyond the
Ministry. The project will support the MAL Nutrition Technical Working Group within and
outside MAL. It is envisaged that the TWG will be used as a platform to coordinate nutrition
in MAL and engage in broader multi-sectoral debate on nutrition at different levels.
MAL will be guided to focus on interventions that have nutrition outcomes and technical
capacity to enhance food and nutrition knowledge and skills will be built at national,
provincial and district levels and in all departments. These technical capacities will include
advocacy, communication, training and partnerships in achieving nutrition-specific and
nutrition sensitive interventions.
MAL will also be strengthened to establish an effective nutrition communication and
advocacy strategy which will improve effective communication on nutrition to the target
communities. This may include the production of Information Education and communication
materials and other nutrition education materials.
Activity Area 3.2 Mainstream nutrition into agricultural, livestock and fisheries
services at district level
A strategy and work plan will be developed within the frameworks of the MAL Strategic Plan
2014-2016 and the National Food & Nutrition Strategic Plan 2011-2015, including advocacy,
communication, training and partnerships in support of achieving more effective links
between agriculture and nutrition. It will also build upon the nutrition “orientation” sessions
already being conducted in the Ministry. A MAL (interdepartmental) nutrition
implementation work-plan stating actions that MAL will take to contribute to combating
under nutrition will be developed. MAL will be assisted in identifying technical partnerships
(other ministries, research organisations, development partners) supportive of delivering the
work plan. Support will be provided to mainstream nutrition into agriculture, livestock and
fisheries services at district level. Central to the mainstreaming will be the roll-out of the
training and implementation of the operational guidelines for food and nutrition officers
developed by MAL.
The focus of the programme will be on: (i) smallholder production and consumption of
nutrition foods (including vegetables, fruit, legumes, indigenous cereals, roots and tubers bio-
fortified crops, fish and small livestock) as a source of important nutrients, vitamins, minerals
and proteins; (ii) promotion of the consumption of bio-fortified crops, including the orange
flesh sweet potatoes, orange maize and the iron- and zinc-enriched beans to improve the
nutritional status of rural households. Additionally, the programme will promote bio-fortified
seed/vines for the production of nutrient-enhanced varieties; (iii) post-harvest handling,
including aflatoxin control, processing, storage and value addition; (iv) food and nutrition
information and training; (v) improving food consumption patterns; (vi) HIV/AIDS
prevention, care and mitigation. Particular attention will be given to the empowerment of
women farmers. These nutrition-sensitive activities will be integrated into the research,
training and extension services outlined under Result 2. Furthermore, nutrition indicators
relating to this result will be incorporated into the M&E system outlined under Result 1.
[15]
4.3 Intervention logic
The design of the project reflects the way that the Ministry operates with policies, plans and
budgets formulated at headquarters level (using information from lower levels) and being
further cascaded down to lower levels for implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Project
activities thus follow this route, with geographical scope defined in variable manner
depending on the concrete needs in each results area and availability of resources. The
proposed project will build upon and further develop initiatives of the Ministry, including
building on results achieved through ongoing support, such as the PEP.
5 IMPLEMENTATION
5.1 Financing agreement
In order to implement this action, it is foreseen to conclude a financing agreement with the
partner country, referred to in Article 17 of Annex IV to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement.
5.2 Indicative implementation period
The indicative operational implementation period of this action, during which the activities
described in section 4.1 will be carried out and the corresponding contracts and agreements
implemented, is 60 months from the date of entry into force of the financing agreement.
Extensions of the implementation period may be agreed by the Commission’s authorising
officer responsible by amending this decision and the relevant contracts and agreements; such
amendments to this decision constitute non-substantial amendment in the sense of Article 9(4)
of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 322/2015.
5.3 Implementation modalities
Indirect management with the partner country
This action with the objective of "Reduced rural poverty and enhanced food and nutrition
security" through "improved capacity of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock to deliver
quality services to smallholder farmers towards increased productivity and enhanced diversity
of Zambia's agricultural sector" may be implemented in indirect management with the
Republic of Zambia in accordance with Article 58(1)(c) of the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No
966/2012 applicable by virtue of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/323 according to the
following modalities:
The Republic of Zambia (National Authorising Officer) will act as the contracting authority
for the procurement and grant procedures. The Commission will control ex ante all the
procurement procedures except in cases where programme estimates are applied, under which
the Commission applies ex ante control for procurement contracts above EUR 50 000 (or
lower, based on a risk assessment) and may apply ex post control for procurement contracts
up to that threshold. The Commission will control ex ante the contracting procedures for all
grant contracts.
Payments are executed by the Commission except in cases where programmes estimates are
applied, under which payments are executed by the partner country for ordinary operating
costs, direct labour and contracts below EUR 300 000 for procurement and up to EUR
100 000 for grants.
The financial contribution covers the ordinary operating costs incurred under the programme
estimates.
[16]
In accordance with Article 190(2)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 and Article
262(3) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 applicable by virtue of Article 36 of
Regulation (EU) 2015/323 and Article 19c(1) of Annex IV to the ACP-EU Partnership
Agreement, the Republic of Zambia shall apply procurement rules of Chapter 3 of Title IV of
Part Two of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012. These rules, as well as rules on grant
procedures in accordance with Article 193 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012
applicable by virtue of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/323, will be laid down in the
financing agreement concluded with the partner country.
5.4 Scope of geographical eligibility for procurement and grants
The geographical eligibility in terms of place of establishment for participating in
procurement and grant award procedures and in terms of origin of supplies purchased as
established in the basic act and set out in the relevant contractual documents shall apply.
The Commission’s authorising officer responsible may extend the geographical eligibility in
accordance with Article 22(1)(b) of Annex IV to the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement on the
basis of urgency or of unavailability of products and services in the markets of the countries
concerned, or in other duly substantiated cases where the eligibility rules would make the
realisation of this action impossible or exceedingly difficult.
5.5 Indicative budget
Activity EU
contribution
(EUR)
Indicative
third party
contribution
5.3.1 Indirect Management with Partner Country
(Programme Estimates) 5 750 000 0
Technical Assistance (Service Contract) 3 500 000 0
5.9 – Evaluation, 5.10 - Audit 350 000 0
5.11 Communication and visibility 50 000 0
Contingencies 350 000 0
Grand total 10 000 000 0
5.6 Organisational set-up and responsibilities
This project will be implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock through a
series of Programme Estimates with external support from a Technical Assistance team that
will be contracted through a service contract upon completion of an international tender
procedure expected to be launched using a suspensive clause once the Commission Decision
has been taken. A Programme Steering Committee (PSC), chaired by the Permanent Secretary
of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock and made up of representatives of MAL
Departments, Cabinet Office, Ministry of Finance, Agricultural Training Institutions,
European Union Delegation, National Authorising Officer, and other relevant stakeholders
will oversee and validate the overall direction and policy of the project (or other
responsibilities to be specified).
[17]
5.7 Performance monitoring and reporting
The day-to-day technical and financial monitoring of the implementation of this action will be
a continuous process and part of the implementing partner’s responsibilities. To this aim, the
implementing partner shall establish a permanent internal, technical and financial monitoring
system for the action and elaborate regular progress reports (not less than annual) and final
reports. Every report shall provide an accurate account of implementation of the action,
difficulties encountered, changes introduced, as well as the degree of achievement of its
results (outputs and direct outcomes) as measured by corresponding indicators, using as
reference the logframe matrix (for project modality) or the list of result indicators (for budget
support). The report shall be laid out in such a way as to allow monitoring of the means
envisaged and employed and of the budget details for the action. The final report, narrative
and financial, will cover the entire period of the action implementation.
The Commission may undertake additional project monitoring visits both through its own
staff and through independent consultants recruited directly by the Commission for
independent monitoring reviews (or recruited by the responsible agent contracted by the
Commission for implementing such reviews).
5.8 Evaluation
Having regard to the nature of the action, mid-term and final evaluations will be carried out
for this action via independent consultants contracted by the Commission.
The mid-term evaluation will be carried out for problem solving and learning purposes, in
particular with respect to capacity development progress. The final evaluation will be carried
out for accountability and learning purposes at various levels (including for policy revision).
The Commission shall inform the implementing partner at least 2 months in advance of the
dates foreseen for the evaluation missions. The implementing partner shall collaborate
efficiently and effectively with the evaluation experts, and inter alia provide them with all
necessary information and documentation, as well as access to the project premises and
activities.
The evaluation reports shall be shared with the partner country and other key stakeholders.
The implementing partner and the Commission shall analyse the conclusions and
recommendations of the evaluations and, where appropriate, in agreement with the partner
country, jointly decide on the follow-up actions to be taken and any adjustments necessary,
including, if indicated, the reorientation of the project.
Indicatively, two contracts for evaluation services for a total budget of EUR 200 000 shall be
concluded under a framework contract in 2019 and 2022.
5.9 Audit
Without prejudice to the obligations applicable to contracts concluded for the implementation
of this action, the Commission may, on the basis of a risk assessment, contract independent
audits or expenditure verification assignments for one or several contracts or agreements.
Indicatively, four contracts for audit services for a total budget of EUR 150 000 shall be
concluded under a framework contract between the years 2016 and 2022.
[18]
5.10 Communication and visibility
Communication and visibility of the EU is a legal obligation for all external actions funded by
the EU.
This action shall contain communication and visibility measures which shall be based on a
specific Communication and Visibility Plan of the Action, to be elaborated at the start of
implementation and supported with the budget indicated in section 5.5 above.
In terms of legal obligations on communication and visibility, the measures shall be
implemented by the Commission, the partner country, contractors, grant beneficiaries and/or
entrusted entities. Appropriate contractual obligations shall be included in, respectively, the
financing agreement, procurement and grant contracts, and delegation agreements.
The Communication and Visibility Manual for European Union External Action shall be used
to establish the Communication and Visibility Plan of the Action and the appropriate
contractual obligations.
[19]
APPENDIX - INDICATIVE LOGFRAME MATRIX (FOR PROJECT MODALITY)
Intervention logic Indicators Baselines (incl. reference year)
Targets (incl. reference year)
Sources and means of
verification
Assumptions
O
ver
all
ob
ject
ive:
Imp
act
To support the Government of Zambia's
policy objective to reduce rural poverty
and enhance food and nutrition security.
• Incidence of rural poverty*
• % of children under 5 who are
stunted*
•Crop diversification index*
77% (2011)
tbc
40% (2013-2014)
1.04 (2012)
50% by 2018.
tbc
30% by 2018
0.83 (2016)
NAIP (2014-2018)
NIP Reviews and
Evaluations: targets,
baselines as sources of
verification as indicated
in the NIP
External factors do not
prevent improved service
delivery from leading to
higher-level outcomes.
Sp
ecif
ic o
bje
ctv
e(s)
:
Ou
tco
me(
s)
S.O.: To improve the capacity of the
MAL to deliver quality services to
smallholder farmers towards increased
productivity and enhanced diversity of
Zambia's agricultural sector.
Outcomes/results:
1: Improved use of evidence in MAL to
drive service delivery.
2. Enhanced capacity of MAL to co-
ordinate extension services.
3. Increased dietary diversity of women
and children in poor rural households.
1) Number of technologies
disseminated in fisheries,
livestock, crops and soils.
2.1) In Service Curricula
updated with best practices in
gender sensitive extension
services contents.
2.2) Number of Curricula in
Agricultural Training Institutes
updated in line with
developments in the ag sector.
3) % of extension workers using
Operational Guidelines for
Food and Nutrition.
0; 2 and 5 annually
(project start)
not updated (project
start)
not updated (start)
0 (project start)
2; 2 and 5 annually by
project end
updated by project end
updated by project end
80% by project end
Key sources:
Policy Study Reports
MAL Performance Audit
Annual project progress
reports
Mid-term, final project
evaluation and annual
progress reports
Idem
Crop Forecasting and
Post-Harvest Surveys
Reports
There is adequate ownership
of the reforms and changes
advocated by the proposed
project in the Ministry both at
central and sub-national
levels.
The level of financial,
organisational, and human
resources mobilised by the
Government are adequate to
sustain the reforms advocated
by the project over longer
term.
Key
Output
Intervention logic Indicators Baselines
(incl. reference year)
Targets
(incl. reference year)
Sources and means of
verification
Assumptions
Key outputs for Expected Result 1:
Capacity building and technical
assistance to strengthen policy and
analysis, planning and budgeting
standards and tools, development of
MAL's Farmer Registration;
strengthening MAL's M&E Agriculture
Statistics and Early Warning Systems.
1.1) Number of Policy Advisory
notes prepared and approved by
management annually.
1.2) Number of policies
developed and reviewed.
1.3) Number of quarterly M&E
reports generated within one
month of the end of the quarter.
1.4) Number of M&E indicators
present in the MAL M&E
manual against which data is
collected consistently.
1.5) Number of Gender
Disaggregated Indicators
reported in the CFS, PHS and
1.1 = 1 (project start)
1.2 = 1 (project start)
1.3 = 0 (project start)
1.4 = 0 (project start)
1.5 = CFS: 3,
PHS: 3, M&E Report:
0 (project start)
1.1 = 4 by end
1.2 = 4 by end
1.3 = 4 yearly
1.4 = All by end
1.5 = CFS: 10 by end;
PHS: 10 by end; M&E
report: All (when
applicable)
Mid-term and final
project evaluation reports
and annual project
progress reports
MAL M&E Reports
MAL M&E Reports
Yearly CFS and PHS and
quarterly MAL M&E
Reports
MAL champions and fosters
improved quality, use and
sharing of data.
MAL ensures that planning
and budgeting processes are
applied and monitored across
the entire institution.
The Ministry allocates
sufficient resources to
effectively support data
collection and analysis.
[20]
M&E Reports.
1.6) Number of nutrition
indicators are formulated and
incorporated in updated MAL
M&E Manual.
1.6 = 1 (project start) 1.6 =6 indicators by end
of project
MAL M&E Reports
Key outputs for Expected Result 2:
Technical assistance, training and
provision of equipment to improve
extension management, institutionalise
joint research-extension planning and
strengthened dissemination.
2.1) Harmonised Operational
Guidelines for Agriculture,
Livestock and Fisheries
Extension Service Providers in
Zambia are operationalised.
2.2) Number of tested
technologies by joint research-
extension teams disseminated.
2.3) Number of Provinces and
Districts with fully functional
HR Information System.
2.4) % of MAL extension
officers trained on the best
practices in gender sensitive
extension services contents.
2.5) % of farmers registered in
the Farmer Register.
2.1 = N/A (guidelines
not finalised)
2.2 = to be established
with the baseline
study
2.3 = to be established
with the baseline
study
2.4 = 0 (project start)
2.5 = Partial
registration of
farmers, to be
measured at inception
2.1 = guidelines are
applied by end of project
2.2 = 10 at project end
2.3 = HR information
on all serving MAL staff
included in HRIS and
linked to Payroll by end
of project
2.4 = 80% at project end
2.5 = 100% farmers
registered and 100%
districts able to regularly
up-date farmer registers.
Annual project
monitoring reports,
Midterm and end of
project evaluation reports
MIS reports
MAL Performance Audit
MAL Performance Audit
The Ministry allocates
sufficient resources to
effectively support the
delivery of extension services
to smallholder farmers.
Key outputs for Expected Result 3:
Technical assistance and training to
mainstream nutrition into policy and into
services at district level.
3.1) Number of women
receiving nutrition education at
camp level.
3.2) Number of male and
female farmers involved in on-
farm processing, storage and
value addition.
3.3) Number of households
using improved crop varieties,
animal and fish breeds.
3.4) (i) minimum dietary
diversity (6-23 months); (ii)
individual dietary diversity
score (24-59 months); and (iii)
individual dietary diversity
score (women of reproductive
age).
Baselines and Targets
to be established
during the baseline
study
Annual project
monitoring reports
Midterm and end of
project evaluation reports
Annual Food and
Nutrition work plans
monitoring reports
MAL supports the
institutional reforms needed
to mainstream nutrition across
the Ministry as well as to
coordinate with other relevant
sectors.
Trainings provided to SSFs
and especially to women are
translated into concrete
actions at household level in
terms of production and
consumption of nutritious
foods, post-harvest handling
incl. processing, storage and
value addition.
NB: Indicators aligned with the relevant programming document are marked with '*'.