42
“Things” that can go wrong with injection Perhaps you’re just thinking about it wrong? Edward Winner, PhD September 2019

“Things” that can go wrong with injection

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

“Things” that can go wrong with injectionPerhaps you’re just thinking about it wrong?

Edward Winner, PhD

September 2019

Page 2: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Installation approach must be appropriate to the media to be effective

• In situ technologies, such as chemical oxidants, reductants, sorbates,

nutrients and microbes all depend upon contact.

• When an amendment is injected, the injectate will often follow subtle

preferential pathways that may or may not intersect with contaminant.

• Of the fractures present in soils, only a small percentage are

hydraulically active at any point in time. In clay, e.g., the percentage

ranges from 5 to 23%. Klint et al., 2001; Jorgensen et al., 2003.

• Gravity or Low Pressure Injection is only appropriate in highly permeable

soils or in rock where the injected fluid migrates through the pore spaces

between soil grains and other openings, e.g., root holes, etc. This is most

applicable to sands and gravels without significant binding fines, i.e., Darcy

flow: Intrinsic permeability

• High Pressure Fracture Emplacement is used to enhance or to create

openings in bedrock or soil with low effective porosity, such as clay.

USEPA CLU-IN, https://clu-

in.org/techfocus/default.focus/sec/Environmental_Fracturing/cat/Overview/ (Sep. 2015)

Page 3: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Mistaken Assumptions Regarding Subsurface

DistributionThe subsurface is not

homogeneous. Liquids,

suspensions, emulsions,

etc. do not distribute

uniformly nor easily.

Page 4: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Distribution is based on physics and has a general pattern that broadly predictable

4

Page 5: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Most soils require effort to distribute amendment

Page 6: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Fracturing Jello

Page 7: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Fracturing Acrylic

Page 8: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Excavation Post-injection Carbon Distribution

Page 9: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Lines of Carbon in the Soil

Page 10: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Carbon Heavy Features

Page 11: “Things” that can go wrong with injection
Page 12: “Things” that can go wrong with injection
Page 13: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Flat Sheets Vertical & Horizontal

Page 14: “Things” that can go wrong with injection
Page 15: “Things” that can go wrong with injection
Page 16: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Within the Hydrated Zone

Page 17: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Vertical Carbon Sheets

Page 18: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Idealized Fracture (Large Scale Sheets)

Frac Rite, Geo Tactical, etc.

18

Page 19: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Closer Examination of Core Slices

Page 20: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Look Closer: Smaller Scale

Natural

Fractures in

Formation

Induced

Fracture in

Formation

20

Page 21: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Carbon Intersecting Between Soil Textures

Page 22: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

More

Page 23: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Intercalation Between Clays

Page 24: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Distribution Patterns

Page 25: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Many Fine Features

Page 26: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Carbon Filling Macropores in the Media

Page 27: “Things” that can go wrong with injection
Page 28: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

How do the two patterns combine?

50 – 300 m/s

Idealized pattern for explaining a principle.

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Oct 13;

374(2078);

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019

Jan. 29; 116(3), (1532).

50 – 300 m/s

Page 29: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Natural Root Features in Soil at 8ft

Page 30: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Filling of Natural Features in Soil

Pressure injected carbon fills existing pathways such as old

infrastructure, plant root hollows, clay fractures, etc. when such are

intersected.

Page 31: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Another Pore But On a Smaller Scale

Page 32: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Well mixed Carbon and Media

Page 33: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

The Injection Procedures Consistent with What

We’ve LearnedUse a positive displacement pump with a bypass valve to

maintain a relatively constant pressure. You want flow rate to

be independent of pressure.

870 psi

340 psi

35 gpm

3 sec 4 sec 4 sec 4 sec3 sec 3 sec 4 sec 4 sec

Page 34: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Subsurface Distribution

Distribution of injectate is controlled primarily by

geology and the “state” of the geology at the time of

injection.

• When “soil” is initially deposited, the horizontal and vertical

components (sx, sy, and sz) of the stress fields are balanced

and are equal to the overburden pressure.

• External forces (tectonics, burial/excavation, glaciation, and

cycles of desiccation/wetting) modify these stress fields.

*Anthropogenic activity: tanks, piping, waterlines, etc.

• Movement of injectate meets the lowest resistance to

movement along the weaker points of the stress field.

Suthersan, S.S. “HYDRAULIC AND PNEUMATIC FRACTURING” Remediation

engineering : design concepts Ed. Suthan S. Suthersan Boca Raton: CRC Press

LLC, 1999.

Page 35: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Surfacing

Page 36: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Short-circuiting

• If injectate finds a pathway of lower resistance that

pathway will be taken.

• A storm water drain ran under a site and …

Page 37: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Mass installed is mass displaced!

Without regard to injectate or its

mass state, mass in equals mass

displaced.

Page 38: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

• Survey

• No consistent preference,

>50% use open bottom

rods

• Guidance documents

• NAVFAC – Extendable

screens and custom

vendor tools

• LARWQCB – “Horizontal

injection tool enhances

the outward injection of

the reagent”0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Survey Response

38

Injectable Screen

Nozzle Tool

Inexperienced or Worst

From a presentation by Ryan Osterreich (Arcadis)

Page 39: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Best Practices for Injection

1. 5 foot spacing using a hexagonal grid

2. Initial injection 3 feet or greater bgs.

3. Install from the outside parameter inward

4. Inject from the top down alternating injection

depths to support injectate overlap

5. Inject over 1 to 2 feet intervals

6. Use an injection tip which directs injectate

horizontally

7. Use a positive displacement pump

8. Rig of sufficient weight and straight rods

9. Pay Attention

Page 40: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Unrealistic Expectations

Page 41: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Reality

Page 42: “Things” that can go wrong with injection

Questions

I appreciate the work of those who contributed to this presentation either in its

development or by executing the on the ground work. Regardless of individual

contributions, the ideas expressed are my own and may or may not be shared

by those who contributed. I’d like to thank the following individuals:

Brad Highley Kentucky DWM UST Branch

West Johnson Kentucky DWM UST Branch

Todd Mullins Kentucky DWM UST Branch

Michael Albright Kentucky DWM UST Branch