1
The XRay and Radio Emission from Supernova 2005kd Vikram V Dwarkadas 1 , Cristina Romero-Cañizales 2 , Ratuja Reddy 1 ,Franz Bauer 3 1. University of Chicago 2. Universidad Diego Portales, Chile 3. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Abstract SN 2005kd is one of the more luminous supernovae (SNe) at both Xray and opAcal wavelengths. We have reanalysed all good resoluAon (> 20’’ FWHM PSF) available archival Xray data on SN 2005kd, combined with a 29ks Chandra observaAon obtained by our group in 2013. The data reveal an Xray light curve that decreases gradually with Ame as t 1.62 . In this poster we explore the evoluAon of the Xray spectrum of 2005kd, the characterisAcs of the ambient medium, and the kinemaAcs of the SN shock wave(s). Reference: Dwarkadas et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1101 IntroducAon Supernova 2005kd was discovered in an automated search by PuckeT and Pelloni on 2005 Nov 12.22 UT. Confirmed as a Type IIn SN, one that shows narrow lines in its opAcal spectrum. Galaxy LEDA 14370, Redshi^ 0.015, Distance 64.2 Mpc (H 0 =71). Xray emission observed at the posiAon of the SN with Swi* in 2007, and subsequently with Chandra. The opAcal lightcurve of SN 2005kd (Tsevtkov, 2008, Variable Stars, 28) shows an unusually long plateau stage, unique for a Type IIn SN, which lasted for at least 192 days. The UV lightcurves (Pritchard et al., 2014, ApJ, 787, 157) show an even larger plateau or increasing flux over almost 2000 days, before the light curve begins to drop off. SN 2005kd – Summary table of Xray observaAons (Note: we have combined some of the smaller Swi^ exposures together to give a larger total exposure.) Conclusions The Xray emission is thermal, and arises from the forward shock in a high density medium – the reverse shock is radiaAve throughout the evoluAon. The derived massloss rate for the progenitor is extremely high, ≥ 2 x 10 3 M yr 1 (for wind velocity 10 km s 1) , suggesAve of mass ejecAons or erupAons seen in LBVs. The growing number of LBVlike progenitors of IIn SNe poses problems for standard stellar evoluAon models. Acknowledgements: We acknowledge support from grant GO415075X, provided by NASA through the CXC, operated by SAO under NASA contract NAS803060; NASA ADAP grant NNX14AR63G; CONICYT through FONDECYT grant 3150238 (CRC); project IC120009 “Millennium InsAtute of Astrophysics” (MAS) funded by the IniciaAva Cient´ıfica Milenio del Ministerio Econom´ıa, Fomento y Turismo de Chile (CRC, FEB), 0.1 1.0 10.0 Flux ( × 10 13 erg s 1 cm 2 ) Swift Chandra XMM t 1.62 1000 0.01 0.10 1.00 Time (days) S ν (mJy) 8.46 GHz 4.86 1.78 1.41 500 3000 Satellite Start Date of Observa3on Days A7er Outburst Exposure (ks) Swi^ 20070124 440 8.95 Chandra 20070304 479 3. XMM 20070329 504 54.2 Chandra 20080103 784 5. Swi^ 20080821 1015 9.3 Swi^ 20111022 to 20120105 2200 9.9 Swi^ 20120601 to 20120716 2419 16.54 Chandra 20131129 2940 29 2 4 6 8 10 counts s 1 keV 1 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 XMMNewton MOS1, MOS2 and PN data and fits. All datasets fiTed simultaneously using the same thermal vmekal model. Required excess abundances of Ca, Ar and Fe. MOS1 data (light green), fit (blue). MOS2 data (black), fit (red). PN data (purple), fit (dark green). Similarity in the fits shows that the same model adequately fits all datasets simultaneously. The FeKα line at 6.7 keV is visible only in the PN data, a result of the effecAve area differences between MOS and PN detectors at 6.7 keV. Fig 2: Swi^ observaAons of SN 2005kd. From le^ to right: 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012. The region is 11.5’ on each side. The pink circle (35’’ in radius) denotes region used to extract the data. The annulus used for the background region is in blue in 2011 panel. The SN is detected at all epochs except in 2011. ANALYSIS First 3 spectra suggest a temperature higher than the range measureable by either Swi^, Chandra or XMM. The temperature is difficult to constrain. Large Xray temperature and early Ame period suggest that the emission arises from the forward shocked circumstellar medium. Temperature behind the reverse shock is expected to be lower. The SN light curve fits a decline rate of t 1.62 ± 0.06. Using Fransson et al. (1996, ApJ, 461, 993, herea^er FLC96) and Dwarkadas & Gruszko (2012, MNRAS, 419, 1515), with the Chevalier (1982, ApJ, 258, 790 ) selfsimilar model for the evoluAon of SN shocks in the circumstellar medium, the decreasing flux indicates a density decreasing as r 2.4+/0.1 . Results are only weakly dependent on the slope of the ejecta density profile n for 9 < n < 12. The density for a constant wind with fixed mass loss parameters falls as r 2 , showing that the wind parameters were not constant in the final stages of the progenitor star evoluAon. The massloss rate is a funcAon of Ame and posiAon. The high flux indicates a high circumstellar wind density and therefore a high massloss rate. Using equaAon 3.11 in FLC96, a reference radius of 10 15 cm, and the XMMNewton flux at 1 keV as reference point (best staAsAcs), we can calculate the value of the quanAty , where is the wind massloss rate in units of 10 5 solar masses yr 1 , and is the wind velocity in units of 10 km s 1 . Given the uncertainAes in the flux and its exact temperature, the laTer being more crucial, we find that 192 < < 656. Thus at the reference radius, massloss rate > 10 3 M yr 1 , and could be as large as 6.6 x10 3 M yr 1 for wind velocity 10 km s 1 . If the wind velocity increases, massloss rate increases. A high massloss rate is consistent with the high Xray luminosity of SN 2005kd, and is sAll lower than that derived for the IIn SN 2010jl. At early Ames, low temperature emission from the reverse shock is not observed. This suggests that perhaps the reverse shock is radiaAve. If maximum ejecta velocity < 10 4 km s 1 , reverse shock is found to be radiaAve throughout the evoluAon for n > 9. A cold dense shell forms behind the shock which absorbs all emission. M 5 /v w1 M 5 v w1 Analysis (conAnued) Plasma is found to always be in ionizaAon equilibrium due to the high densiAes, jusAfying our use of equilibrium models to fit the emission. We have also reanalyzed archival radio data on SN 2005kd. The longlasAng radio emission also suggests evoluAon in a high density medium. The sparse data prevent an accurate massloss determinaAon, but they are consistent with those derived from Xrays. Derived Xray massloss rates are higher than expected from stars usually considered as SN progenitors red supergiants, WolfRayet stars, even yellow hypergiants (massloss rates ≤ 10 3 M yr 1 ). This suggests a high massloss rate at the end of the star’s evoluAon, perhaps due to ejected mass shells or erupAons, as in Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs). Following the XMMNewton fit, all spectra were fit with a single thermal vmekal model (a two vmekal model fit does not provide a beTer fit to the XMM data). Best fits to the spectra show that the first three epochs, up to day 504, are fit by a high temperature component, with a column density NH that varies between 1. to 0.4 (x 10 22 cm 2 ). The temperature decreases gradually in subsequent spectra, as does the column density, which approaches the GalacAc value by about 3000 days. M 5 /v w1 Top The 0.38 keV Xray lightcurve of SN 2005kd, showing unabsorbed flux with 1σ error bars. Time is given in the rest frame of the SN, along with the kcorrected flux. The data comprise 4 Swi*,3 Chandra and 1 XMMNewton data points. The best fit to the data (dashed line) suggests the flux is decreasing as t 1.62 ± 0.06 . BoEom Radio lightcurve of SN 2005kd at 8.46 GHz (blue, solid line), 4.86 GHz (red, dasheddoTed line), 1.78 GHz (green, dashed line) and 1.41 GHz (magenta, doTed line). Downward triangles 3σ upper limits. Black triangle upper limit at 7.91 GHz. Error bars at ± 1σ. Where necessary, the flux has been converted using the calculated radio spectral index. The few available data points do not allow for a robust fit, but the extracted parameter values are not inconsistent with those obtained from the Xray data.

The$XRay$and$Radio$Emission$from$Supernova2005kd$ · The$XRay$and$Radio$Emission$from$Supernova2005kd$ Vikram V Dwarkadas1, Cristina Romero-Cañizales2, Ratuja Reddy1,Franz Bauer3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The$XRay$and$Radio$Emission$from$Supernova2005kd$ · The$XRay$and$Radio$Emission$from$Supernova2005kd$ Vikram V Dwarkadas1, Cristina Romero-Cañizales2, Ratuja Reddy1,Franz Bauer3

The  X-­‐Ray  and  Radio  Emission  from  Supernova  2005kd  Vikram V Dwarkadas1, Cristina Romero-Cañizales2, Ratuja Reddy1,Franz Bauer3

1. University of Chicago 2. Universidad Diego Portales, Chile 3. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Abstract    ² SN  2005kd  is  one  of  the  more  luminous  supernovae  

(SNe)  at  both  X-­‐ray  and  opAcal  wavelengths.    ² We  have  re-­‐analysed  all  good  resoluAon  (>  20’’  

FWHM  PSF)  available  archival  X-­‐ray  data  on  SN  2005kd,  combined  with  a  29ks  Chandra  observaAon  obtained  by  our  group  in  2013.    

² The  data  reveal  an  X-­‐ray  light  curve  that  decreases  gradually  with  Ame  as  t-­‐1.62.  In  this  poster  we  explore  the  evoluAon  of  the  X-­‐ray  spectrum  of  2005kd,  the  characterisAcs  of  the  ambient  medium,  and  the  kinemaAcs  of  the  SN  shock  wave(s).  

² Reference: Dwarkadas et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1101

 IntroducAon    

q Supernova  2005kd  was  discovered  in  an  automated  search  by  PuckeT  and  Pelloni  on  2005  Nov  12.22  UT.  

q Confirmed  as  a  Type  IIn  SN,  one  that  shows  narrow  lines  in  its  opAcal  spectrum.    

q Galaxy  LEDA  14370,  Redshi^  0.015,  Distance    64.2  Mpc  (H0=71).    

q X-­‐ray  emission  observed  at  the  posiAon  of  the  SN  with  Swi*  in  2007,  and  subsequently  with  Chandra.    

q The  opAcal  lightcurve  of  SN  2005kd  (Tsevtkov,  2008,  Variable  Stars,  28)  shows  an  unusually  long  plateau  stage,  unique  for  a  Type  IIn    SN,  which  lasted  for  at  least  192  days.    

q The  UV  lightcurves  (Pritchard  et  al.,  2014,  ApJ,  787,  157)  show  an  even  larger  plateau  or  increasing  flux  over  almost  2000  days,  before  the  light  curve  begins  to  drop  off.    

SN  2005kd  –  Summary  table  of  X-­‐ray  observaAons  (Note:  we  have  combined  some  of  the  smaller  Swi^  exposures  together  to  give  a  larger  total  exposure.)  

Conclusions    Ø The  X-­‐ray  emission  is  thermal,  and  arises  from  the  

forward  shock  in  a  high  density  medium  –  the  reverse  shock  is  radiaAve  throughout  the  evoluAon.    

Ø The  derived  mass-­‐loss  rate  for  the  progenitor  is  extremely  high,  ≥  2  x  10-­‐3  M¤  yr-­‐1  (for  wind  velocity  10  km  s-­‐1),  suggesAve  of  mass  ejecAons  or  erupAons  seen  in  LBVs.    

Ø The  growing  number  of  LBV-­‐like  progenitors  of  IIn  SNe    poses  problems  for  standard  stellar  evoluAon  models.  

Acknowledgements:  We  acknowledge  support  from  grant  GO4-­‐15075X,  provided  by  NASA  through  the  CXC,  operated  by  SAO  under  NASA  contract  NAS8-­‐03060;  NASA  ADAP  grant  NNX14AR63G;  CONICYT  through  FONDECYT  grant  3150238  (CRC);  project  IC120009  “Millennium  InsAtute  of  Astrophysics”  (MAS)  funded  by  the  IniciaAva  Cient´ıfica  Milenio  del  Ministerio  Econom´ıa,  Fomento  y  Turismo  de  Chile  (CR-­‐C,  FEB),  

0.1

1.0

10.0

Flux

( ×

10−1

3 erg

s−1 cm

−2)

SwiftChandraXMM

t−1.62

10000.01

0.10

1.00

Time (days)

S ν (m

Jy)

8.46 GHz4.861.781.41

500 3000

Satellite   Start  Date  of  Observa3on  

Days  A7er  Outburst  

Exposure  (ks)  

Swi^   2007-­‐01-­‐24   440   8.95  

Chandra   2007-­‐03-­‐04   479   3.  

XMM   2007-­‐03-­‐29   504   54.2  

Chandra   2008-­‐01-­‐03   784   5.  

Swi^   2008-­‐08-­‐21   1015   9.3  

Swi^   2011-­‐10-­‐22  to  2012-­‐01-­‐05  

2200   9.9  

Swi^   2012-­‐06-­‐01  to  2012-­‐07-­‐16  

2419   16.54  

Chandra   2013-­‐11-­‐29   2940   29  

Energy (keV)2 4 6 8 10

coun

ts s

−1 k

eV−1

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

XMM-­‐Newton  MOS1,  MOS2  and  PN  data  and  fits.  All  datasets  fiTed  simultaneously  using  the  same  thermal  vmekal  model.  Required  excess  abundances  of  Ca,  Ar  and  Fe.  MOS1  data  (light  green),    fit  (blue).  MOS2  data  (black),  fit  (red).  PN  data  (purple),  fit  (dark  green).  Similarity  in  the  fits  shows  that  the  same  model  adequately  fits  all  datasets  simultaneously.  The  Fe-­‐Kα  line  at  6.7  keV  is  visible  only  in  the  PN  data,  a  result  of  the  effecAve  area  differences  between  MOS  and  PN  detectors  at  6.7  keV.  

Fig  2:  Swi^  observaAons  of  SN  2005kd.  From  le^  to  right:  2007,  2008,  2011  and  2012.  The  region  is  11.5’  on  each  side.    The  pink  circle  (35’’  in  radius)  denotes  region  used  to  extract  the  data.  The  annulus  used  for  the  background  region  is  in  blue  in  2011  panel.  The  SN  is  detected  at  all  epochs  except  in  2011.  

ANALYSIS  •  First  3  spectra  suggest  a  temperature  higher  than  

the  range  measureable  by  either  Swi^,  Chandra  or  XMM.  The  temperature  is  difficult  to  constrain.  

•  Large  X-­‐ray  temperature  and  early  Ame  period  suggest  that  the  emission  arises  from  the  forward  shocked  circumstellar  medium.    Temperature  behind  the  reverse  shock  is  expected  to  be  lower.    

•  The  SN  light  curve  fits  a  decline  rate  of  t-­‐1.62  ±  0.06.    •  Using  Fransson  et  al.  (1996,  ApJ,  461,  993,  

herea^er  FLC96)  and  Dwarkadas  &  Gruszko  (2012,  MNRAS,  419,  1515),  with  the  Chevalier  (1982,  ApJ,  258,  790  )  self-­‐similar  model  for  the  evoluAon  of  SN  shocks  in  the  circumstellar  medium,  the  decreasing  flux  indicates  a  density  decreasing  as  r-­‐2.4+/-­‐0.1.  Results  are  only  weakly  dependent  on  the  slope  of  the  ejecta  density  profile  n  for  9  <  n  <  12.    

•  The  density  for  a  constant  wind  with  fixed  mass-­‐loss  parameters  falls  as  r-­‐2,  showing  that  the  wind  parameters  were  not  constant    in  the  final  stages  of  the  progenitor  star  evoluAon.  The    mass-­‐loss  rate  is  a  funcAon  of  Ame  and  posiAon.  

•  The  high  flux  indicates  a  high  circumstellar  wind  density  and  therefore  a  high  mass-­‐loss  rate.  Using  equaAon  3.11  in  FLC96,  a  reference  radius  of  1015  cm,  and  the  XMM-­‐Newton  flux  at  1  keV  as  reference  point  (best  staAsAcs),  we  can  calculate  the  value  of  the  quanAty                                  ,  where                      is  the  wind  mass-­‐loss  rate  in  units  of  10-­‐5  solar  masses  yr-­‐1,  and                  is  the  wind  velocity  in  units  of  10  km  s-­‐1.  

•  Given  the  uncertainAes  in  the  flux  and  its  exact  temperature,  the  laTer  being  more  crucial,  we  find  that    192  <                                  <  656.  Thus  at  the  reference  radius,  mass-­‐loss  rate  >  10-­‐3    M¤  yr-­‐1,  and    could  be  as  large  as  6.6  x10-­‐3    M¤  yr-­‐1  for  wind  velocity  10  km  s-­‐1.    

•  If  the  wind  velocity  increases,  mass-­‐loss  rate  increases.  A  high  mass-­‐loss  rate  is  consistent  with  the  high  X-­‐ray  luminosity  of  SN  2005kd,  and  is  sAll  lower  than  that  derived  for  the  IIn  SN  2010jl.  

•  At  early  Ames,  low  temperature  emission  from  the  reverse  shock  is  not  observed.  This  suggests  that  perhaps  the  reverse  shock  is  radiaAve.    

•  If  maximum  ejecta  velocity  <  104  km  s-­‐1,  reverse  shock  is  found  to  be  radiaAve  throughout  the  evoluAon  for  n  >  9.  A  cold  dense  shell  forms  behind  the  shock  which  absorbs  all  emission.    

M−5 / vw1 M−5

vw1

Analysis  (conAnued)  •  Plasma  is  found  to  always  be  in  ionizaAon  

equilibrium  due  to  the  high  densiAes,  jusAfying  our  use  of  equilibrium  models  to  fit  the  emission.  

•   We  have  also  reanalyzed  archival  radio  data  on  SN  2005kd.  The  long-­‐lasAng  radio  emission  also  suggests  evoluAon  in  a  high  density  medium.  The  sparse  data  prevent  an  accurate  mass-­‐loss  determinaAon,  but  they  are  consistent  with  those  derived  from  X-­‐rays.  

•  Derived  X-­‐ray  mass-­‐loss  rates  are  higher  than  expected  from  stars  usually  considered  as  SN  progenitors  -­‐  red  supergiants,  Wolf-­‐Rayet  stars,  even    yellow  hypergiants  (mass-­‐loss  rates  ≤  10-­‐3  M¤  yr-­‐1  ).    

•  This  suggests  a  high  mass-­‐loss  rate  at  the  end  of  the  star’s  evoluAon,  perhaps  due  to  ejected  mass  shells  or  erupAons,  as  in  Luminous  Blue  Variables  (LBVs).  

Following  the  XMM-­‐Newton  fit,  all  spectra  were  fit  with  a  single  thermal  vmekal  model  (a  two  vmekal  model  fit  does  not  provide  a  beTer  fit  to  the  XMM  data).  Best  fits  to  the  spectra  show  that  the  first  three  epochs,  up  to  day  504,  are  fit  by  a  high  temperature  component,  with  a  column  density  NH  that  varies  between  1.  to  0.4  (x  1022  cm-­‐2).  The  temperature  decreases  gradually  in  subsequent  spectra,  as  does  the  column  density,  which  approaches  the  GalacAc  value  by  about  3000  days.  

M−5 / vw1

Top  The  0.3-­‐8  keV  X-­‐ray  lightcurve  of  SN  2005kd,  showing  unabsorbed  flux  with  1σ  error  bars.  Time  is  given  in  the  rest  frame  of  the  SN,  along  with  the  k-­‐corrected  flux.  The  data  comprise  4  Swi*,  3  Chandra  and  1  XMM-­‐Newton  data-­‐points.    The  best  fit  to  the  data  (dashed  line)  suggests  the  flux  is  decreasing  as  t-­‐1.62  ±  0.06.      BoEom  Radio  lightcurve  of  SN  2005kd  at  8.46  GHz  (blue,  solid  line),  4.86  GHz  (red,  dashed-­‐doTed  line),  1.78  GHz  (green,  dashed  line)  and  1.41  GHz  (magenta,  doTed  line).    Downward  triangles  -­‐  3σ  upper  limits.  Black  triangle  -­‐  upper  limit  at  7.91  GHz.  Error  bars  at  ±  1σ.    Where  necessary,  the  flux  has  been  converted  using  the  calculated  radio  spectral  index.  The  few  available  data  points  do  not  allow  for  a  robust  fit,  but  the  extracted  parameter  values  are  not  inconsistent  with  those  obtained  from  the  X-­‐ray  data.