Upload
arama
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Thermal and Nonthermal Contributions to the Flare X-ray Flux. Brian R. Dennis 1 , Kenneth J. H. Phillips 1, 2 , Richard A. Schwartz 1, 3 , Anne K. Tolbert 1,3 , and Hugh S. Hudson 4 1 NASA GSFC, 2 NRC Senior Resident Research Associate 3 SSAI, 4 SSL Berkeley. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Thermal and Nonthermal Contributions
to theFlare X-ray Flux
Brian R. Dennis1, Kenneth J. H. Phillips1, 2, Richard A. Schwartz1, 3, Anne K. Tolbert1,3, and Hugh S. Hudson4
1NASA GSFC, 2NRC Senior Resident Research Associate3SSAI, 4SSL Berkeley
IntroductionRHESSI provides high resolution imaging and spectroscopy X-ray observations in the critical energy range from a few keV to a few tens of keV. These observations allow the following classic ways to be used to differentiate between the thermal and nonthermal components of the X-ray flux:
– gradually vs. impulsively varying flux
– exponential vs. power-law spectra,
– extended coronal vs. compact footpoint sources
RHESSI also detects the iron-line complex at ~6.7 keV (1.9 Å).
– The peak energy is a function of temperature.
– The equivalent width (line-to-continuum ratio) is a function of temperature and iron abundance.
Mewe (1985/6) and Chianti (1997) give line and continuum spectra as functions of temperature and abundances.
These predictions are compared with RHESSI measurements for the X-flare on 21 April 2002.
ReferencesMewe, Gronenschild, van den Oord, 1985, (Paper V) A. & A. Suppl., 62, 197; Mewe, Lemen, and van den Oord, 1986, (Paper VI) A. & A. Suppl., 65, 511
Mewe, R., Kaastra, J. S., Liedahl, D. A., “Update of MEKA: MEKAL” (http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/journal/meka6.html) Legacy, Journal of the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HESARC), NASA GSFC, 6, 16, 1995.
Dere, K. P.; Landi, E.; Mason, H. E.; Monsignori Fossi, B. C.; Young, P. R., “CHIANTI - an atomic database for emission lines” A & A Supplement series, 125, 149-173, 1997.
X-flare on 21 April 2002
RHESSI Time History
• Soft X-ray flux (<12 keV) rises gradually suggesting thermal emission.
• Hard X-ray flux (>25 keV) shows impulsive peaks at ~01:16 UT suggesting nonthermal emission.
RHESSI ContoursWhite: 6 – 12 keVBrown: 12 – 25 keVBlue: 25 – 50 keV
TRACE Image
1.95 nm
RHESSI Imaging
• Compact hard X-ray sources (>25 keV) on TRACE ribbons suggest nonthermal emission at loop footpoints.
• Extended soft X-ray source (<25 keV) and diffuse TRACE emission in corona suggest thermal emission at ~20 MK.
Shutters Out
RHESSI Spectra
Thin Shutters In (A1)
Detector #4
1-minute accumulations
RHESSI Spectra
Thin Shutters (A1)
Thin + Thick (A3)
Detector #4
1-minute accumulations
RHESSI Spectra
• Steep spectra before ~01:00 UT suggest thermal emission.
• Flatter power-law spectrum above ~20 keV at 01:16 UT suggests nonthermal emission.
• Peak at ~6.7 keV (1.9 Å) is the iron-line complex from thermal plasma.
• Peak at ~8 keV is most probably the Fe/Ni complex.
• Peak at ~10.5 keV is most probably caused by K-escape from the germanium detectors.
Mewe & Chianti Thermal Spectra
Peak Position of Iron-line ComplexE
nerg
y in
keV
Iron-line ComplexRHESSI Measurements of Peak Energy
A0 A1 A3
Iron-line Complex - Peak Energy
• Detector-to-detector variations and higher-than-predicted peak energy must be instrument calibration issues.
• Variation of peak energy with time may be related to high detector count rates.
• Reason for sharp rise in peak energy determined from detector #8 after ~01:14 UT is unknown.
Equivalent Width of Iron-Line Complex
Mewe_spec(coronal - Meyer 1985)
Chianti (coronal abundances)
Chianti (photospheric)
Iron-line ComplexRHESSI Measurements of Equivalent Width
Iron-line Complex – Equivalent Width
• Equivalent-width measurements should be relatively independent of detector energy calibration and sensitivity.
• Detector-to-detector differences seem to be related to energy resolution.
• Large differences exist between Mewe (1985/6) and Chianti (1997) predictions.
• Measured equivalent widths are higher than predicted by both Mewe and Chianti, even for coronal abundances (Fe abundance 3 x photospheric).
Conclusions• RHESSI can differentiate between thermal and
nonthermal emissions.• Iron-line features are clearly seen in RHESSI spectra.• Detector response is still preliminary – work in
progress.• Mewe (1985/6) and Chianti (1997) models of the
thermal spectra differ in the predicted line intensities.• GOES temperatures may be inaccurate since they are
calculated using the older Mewe spectra.