2
There is an urgent need to put in place adequate infrastructure, human resources (especially specialists) and especially emergency obstetric care services especially blood banks and referral services. With 80% of women giving birth in instuons, the system must be able to gear up to respond to them. Post-NatalCare The coverage of postnatal care immediately aſter birth seems to be high as per the AHS 2012-13, with over 80% of women receiving care within 48 hours and one week of delivery. However, a cause of concern is that as per the HMIS 2015-16, only 58% of women received postnatal care between 48 hours to two weeks aſter delivery, a period when complicaons are likely to occur. Moreover, an important indicator of postnatal complicaons is not captured by the AHS, but data from the DLHS shows that in 2007-2008, 40% of women had post-natal complicaons. The lack of this data in subsequent surveys makes it difficult to understand the quality of both intra and postnatal care, but it is clear that there is a need for strengthening post- natal care provision. Financial Assistance and Out of Pocket Expense (OoPE) The Janani Suraksha Yojana provides women with a financial incenve of Rs.1400 for delivery by an SBA in an instuon and Rs.500 for a delivery aended by an SBA at home. NFHS data shows that only 61% of women who delivered in an instuon received the JSY benefit while the AHS 2012-13 shows that as many as 86.6% of women received the benefit. Domiciliary deliveries, it appears, have been leſt out of JSY benefits.This is evident from the HMIS data (2015-16) which shows that only 4% of women delivering at home received the financial assistance. Despite the JSY incenves women connue to bear large out of pocket expenses to the tune of Rs. 1746 in urban areas and Rs. 1259 in rural areas, per delivery. This is further substanated by CRM reports which suggest that women have to bear out of pocket expenses for drugs, despite the launch of Mamta Abhiyan for the state which guarantees the availability of free drug. They also have to bear expenses to avail private transport to reach health facilies as well as drop back aſter delivery. Contraception and Family Planning Securing maternal health of women requires working beyond the provision of care in pregnancy and childbirth, and also includes ensuring access to contracepon and safe aboron services. The link between ferlity and MMR is well established, with studies consistently showing that a drop in ferlity can result in a reducon in MMR and improved maternal health. In the state of Madhya Pradesh, TFR dropped from 3.1 to 2.3 between NFHS 3 and 4. Data shows that the burden of family planning sll lies on the woman and it is centered on liming methods rather than spacing methods, with female sterilisaon being the most widely used method. As per the NFHS-4, Female sterilisaon- 42.2%, Male sterilisaon- 0.5%, IUD/PPIUD- 0.5%, Pill- 1.3%, Condom- 4.9%. The rao of female to male sterilisaon is roughly 1:87 for urban areas and 1:90 for rural areas (NFHS-4, 2015-16). Moreover, the quality of family planning services connues to be a maer of concern and this has been reported in news arcles in MP. For instance, in November 2014, 132 women in Chhatarpur district were sterilized in 5 hours in the camp held at a CHC. The surgeries were conducted well at night, even past midnight. The government’s family planning programme is on sterilisaon of married women. The health focus ofadolescents remains a blind spot. Number of male sterilisaon methods are not seeing uptake as ASHAs face social barriers. Overall, the data suggests that greater aenon needs to be given to temporary spacing methods, engaging men in taking on contracepve responsibility and reducing the burden on women. The quality of care of contracepve services is also a maer of concern which must be addressed. Access to Safe Abortion Unsafe aboron is a significant cause of maternal deaths worldwide. Provision of safe aboron services, therefore, is an important measure to reduce maternal deaths. Although aboron is legal in India, access to legal, safe aboron services connues to be a challenge and women end up resorng to unskilled providers. In the case of Madhya Pradesh, AHS (2012-13) shows that: 42% aborons - not performed by a skilled provider. 64.9% aborons in urban areas – performed by skilled health personnel. 54.2% in rural areas - performed by skilled health personnel. It suggests that greater availability and accessibility to aboron services in urban areas as compared to rural. Provision of safe and easily accessible aboron services emerges as an important area of improvement in order to reduce complicaons and deaths due to aboron. Way Forward Over the past decade, proporon of women seeking services has increased. However, quality and adequacy of care throughout the connuum of antenatal care, delivery (especially emergency obstetric care) and postnatal care emerges as a crical concern which must be addressed urgently. There are also important blind spots, such as the lack of provision of skilled birth aendance to home deliveries which require aenon. Beyond services provided during pregnancy and childbirth, what also warrants aenon is the provision of good quality accessible and voluntary services for contracepon and aboron, male contracepon and roune services instead of camp approachwhich would go a long way in ensuring maternal health in a more comprehensive manner. Madhya Pradesh Maternal and Reproductive Health Status Report- 2016 What Does the Evidence Say? CENTRE FOR HEALTHAND SOCIAL JUSTICE Secretariat for Maternal Health Rights Campaign Delhi/Madhya Pradesh For further details please contact: CENTRE FOR HEALTHAND SOCIAL JUSTICE Basement of Young Women's Hostel No. 2,Avenue 21, G Block, Saket, New Delhi-110017 Phone : 91-11-26511425, 26535203, Telefax : 91-11-26536041 Email : [email protected] ; Webside : www.chsj.org 42% of the aborons in Madhya Pradesh are not performed by a skilled provider. Source: HMIS (various years) 4.3 5.3 2.8 4.2 91.4 93.8 84 82.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HMIS 2012-13 HMIS 2013-14 HMIS 2014-15 HMIS 2015-16 Women Receiving JSY Incentives (%) Mothers paid JSY incentive for home deliveries JSY beneficiaries of public institution deliveries Source: HMIS (various years) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 HMIS 2012-13 HMIS 2013-14 HMIS 2014-15 HMIS 2015-16 Postnatal Care Indicators (%) Women received post-partum check-up within 48 hrs. of delivery Post-Natal Care/Women got a post partum check-up between 48hrs. to 14 days % Post-Natal Care/PNC maternal complications attended to Total Deliveries For Private Circulaon only Page | 5

There is an urgent need to put in Women Receiving JSY

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: There is an urgent need to put in Women Receiving JSY

There is an urgent need to put in place adequate infrastructure, human resources (especially specialists) and especially emergency obstetric care services especially blood banks and referral services. With 80% of women giving birth in institutions, the system must be able to gear up to respond to them.

Post-NatalCareThe coverage of postnatal care immediately after birth seems to be high as per the AHS 2012-13, with over 80% of women receiving care within 48 hours and one week of delivery. However, a cause of concern is that as per the HMIS 2015-16, only 58% of women received postnatal care between 48 hours to two weeks after delivery, a period when complications are likely to occur. Moreover, an important indicator of postnatal complications is not captured by the AHS, but data from the DLHS shows that in 2007-2008, 40% of women had post-natal complications. The lack of this data in subsequent surveys makes it difficult to understand the quality of both intra and postnatal care, but it is clear that there is a need for strengthening post-natal care provision.

Financial Assistance and Out of Pocket Expense (OoPE)The Janani Suraksha Yojana provides women with a financial incentive of Rs.1400 for delivery by an SBA in an institution and Rs.500 for a delivery attended by an

SBA at home. NFHS data shows that only 61% of women who delivered in an institution received the JSY benefit while the AHS 2012-13 shows that as many as 86.6% of women received the benefit. Domiciliary deliveries, it appears, have been left out of JSY benefits.This is evident from the HMIS data (2015-16) which shows that only 4% of women delivering at home received the financial assistance.

Despite the JSY incentives women continue to bear large out of pocket expenses to the tune of Rs. 1746 in urban areas and Rs. 1259 in rural areas, per delivery.

This is further substantiated by CRM reports which suggest that women have to bear out of pocket expenses for drugs, despite the launch of Mamta Abhiyan for the state which guarantees the availability of free drug. They also have to bear expenses to avail private transport to reach health facilities as well as drop back after delivery.

Contraception and Family PlanningSecuring maternal health of women requires working beyond the provision of care in pregnancy and childbirth, and also includes ensuring access to contraception and safe abortion services. The link between fertility and MMR is well established, with studies consistently showing that a drop in fertility can result in a reduction in MMR and improved maternal health. In the state of Madhya Pradesh, TFR dropped from 3.1 to 2.3 between NFHS 3 and 4. Data shows that the burden of family planning still lies on the woman and it is centered on limiting methods

rather than spacing methods, with female sterilisation being the most widely used method. As per the NFHS-4, Female sterilisation- 42.2%, Male sterilisation- 0.5%, IUD/PPIUD- 0.5%, Pill- 1.3%, Condom- 4.9%.

The ratio of female to male sterilisation is roughly 1:87 for urban areas and 1:90 for rural areas (NFHS-4, 2015-16). Moreover, the quality of family planning services continues to be a matter of concern and this has been reported in news articles in MP. For instance, in November 2014, 132 women in Chhatarpur district were sterilized in 5 hours in the camp held at a CHC. The surgeries were conducted well at night, even past midnight. The government’s family planning programme is on sterilisation of married women. The health focus ofadolescents remains a blind spot. Number of male sterilisation methods are not seeing uptake as ASHAs face social barriers.

Overall, the data suggests that greater attention needs to be given to temporary spacing methods, engaging men in taking on contraceptive responsibility and reducing the burden on women. The quality of care of contraceptive services is also a matter of concern which must be addressed.

Access to Safe AbortionUnsafe abortion is a significant cause of maternal deaths worldwide. Provision of safe abortion services, therefore, is an important measure to reduce maternal deaths. Although abortion is legal in India, access to legal, safe abortion services continues to be a challenge and women end up resorting to unskilled providers. In the case of Madhya Pradesh, AHS (2012-13) shows that:

• 42% abortions - not performed by a skilled provider.

• 64.9% abortions in urban areas – performed by skilled health personnel.

• 54.2% in rural areas - performed by skilled health personnel.

It suggests that greater availability and accessibility to abortion services in urban areas as compared to rural.

Provision of safe and easily accessible abortion services emerges as an important area of improvement in order to reduce complications and deaths due to abortion.

Way ForwardOver the past decade, proportion of women seeking services has increased. However, quality and adequacy of care throughout the continuum of antenatal care, delivery (especially emergency obstetric care) and postnatal care emerges as a critical concern which must be addressed urgently. There are also important blind spots, such as the lack of provision of skilled birth attendance to home deliveries which require attention. Beyond services provided during pregnancy and childbirth, what also warrants attention is the provision of good quality accessible and voluntary services for contraception and abortion, male contraception and routine services instead of camp approachwhich would go a long way in ensuring maternal health in a more comprehensive manner.

Madhya PradeshMaternal and Reproductive Health Status Report- 2016

What Does the Evidence Say?

CENTRE FOR HEALTHAND SOCIAL JUSTICESecretariat for Maternal Health Rights Campaign

Delhi/Madhya Pradesh

For further details please contact:

CENTRE FOR HEALTHAND SOCIAL JUSTICEBasement of Young Women's Hostel No. 2,Avenue 21, G Block, Saket, New Delhi-110017

Phone : 91-11-26511425, 26535203, Telefax : 91-11-26536041Email : [email protected] ; Webside : www.chsj.org

42% of the abortions in Madhya Pradesh are not performed by a skilled provider.

Source: HMIS (various years)

4.3 5.3 2.8 4.2

91.4 93.8

84 82.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HMIS 2012-13 HMIS 2013-14 HMIS 2014-15 HMIS 2015-16

Women Receiving JSY Incentives (%)

Mothers paid JSY incentive for home deliveries JSY beneficiaries of public institution deliveries

Source: HMIS (various years)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HMIS 2012-13 HMIS 2013-14 HMIS 2014-15 HMIS 2015-16

Postnatal Care Indicators (%)

Women received post-partum check-up within 48 hrs. of delivery

Post-Natal Care/Women got a post partum check-up between 48hrs. to 14 days

% Post-Natal Care/PNC maternal complications attended to Total Deliveries

For P

rivat

e Ci

rcul

ation

onl

y

Page | 5

Page 2: There is an urgent need to put in Women Receiving JSY

IntroductionOver the past decade, the state of Madhya Pradesh, the second largest state in India, has made significant progress in improving maternal health and specifically in reducing maternal mortality. Although its Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), at 221 is still higher than the national average of 178 (SRS, 2011-13), it is much lower than what it was in 2005-06 at 301 (RGI, 2006). Significant efforts to improve maternal health in this high-focus state include:

• National schemes like Janani Suraksha Yojana(JSY) and Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram (JSSK).

• State initiatives at village level such as the ‘Gram Arogya Kendra’

There are also gross inequities within the state of Madhya Pradesh with a significant rural and tribal population which poses enormous challenges as reflected in the skewed and unequal maternal health indicators in different parts of the state.

As per AHS 2012-13, the MMR of Madhya Pradesh is at 221, but the divisions with large marginalised and socioeconomically deprived tribal communities show much higher ratios such as Shahdol, Sagar and Rewa with MMR of 361, 322 and 268 respectively.

Review of data shows that there are critical gaps in maternal health care services at all levels, which need to be acknowledged so that they may be addressed.

This Maternal and Reproductive Health Status Report attempts to provide a snapshot of the current state of maternal health care and indicators in the state of Madhya Pradesh and highlight both the gains as well as gaps in maternal health care services by drawing upon secondary data sources1.

Quality and Adequacy of Ante-Natal Care (ANC)Ensuring safe childbirth requires that a continuum of care be provided to women beginning with the antenatal period, through delivery and extending into the postnatal period which provided at the right time and in

1 National Family Health Survey [NFHS] (2005-06 and 2014-15),District Level Health Survey [DLHS] (2007-08), Annual Health Survey [AHS] (2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13), CommonReview Mission [CRM] Reports (2012and 2014), Health ManagementInformation Systems [HMIS](2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16), Rural Health Statistic (2008,2012,2015) and other published literature.

the appropriate manner allows timelyidentification and management of obstetric complications and infections.. As per the NFHS 4 (2015-16), the registration of women for ANC in Madhya Pradesh seems to be high with 92.2% of pregnant women being registered for ANC. However of these, only 53% of women had their first antenatal checkup in the first trimester and only 36% received 4 or more check-ups. This is certainly better than DLHS 3 (2007-08) where only 61% of women received any ANC and only 34% received it in the first trimester. However, the quality and completeness of services provided remain critically poor.

As shown in the folllowing graph, although the total number of women registered for ANC as per NFHS 4 (2014-15) is well over 90%, only 11.4% of women received all the componentsof ANC, which is not much higherthan the 8.6% that it was in DLHS 3 (2007-2008).

The urban-rural disparity in this regard is also very high where in urban areas show almost double the number of women who receive full ANC as compared to rural areas. The disparity in ANC coverage is also seen across socioeconomic groups in DLHS 3 (2007-08), with 54% of Scheduled Tribe and 38% Scheduled Caste women receiving no ANC as compared to 34% OBC and 24% ‘other caste’ women.

Similarly, 58% of women from the lowest quintile received no ANC, as compared to 39% of the entire state. Since the subsequent AHS surveys do not provide such disaggregation of data, it is not possible to assess whether any improvements are being seen in services to the most marginalized. With regard to the components of ANC, NFHS 4 data shows that while the provision of tetanus injections is reasonably high, the most neglected component of ANC appears to be Iron Folic Acid tablets. The consumption of IFA tablets is as low as 23.6%, and it is lower in rural areas than urban ones. This is especially a cause for concern given the high prevalence of anaemia among pregnant women in the State.According to NFHS 4, more than half (55%) of

pregnant women in Madhya Pradesh are anaemic, and although this is slightly lower than in NFHS3 (2005-06), the proportion is still unacceptably high; this is significant because hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of maternal deaths in the state, with 26%of women dying due to bleeding (6th CRM Report, 2012 ).

Overall, the picture of antenatal care services suggests that much greater attention needs to be paid to ensuring optimal quality and adequate provision of antenatal services. In the absence of this, a mere increase in registration of women for ANC is not a substantive improvement.

Attention to Home DeliveriesAs expected, there has been a rise in the institutional deliveries over the last decade in both rural and urban areas, due in part to the immense focus on Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY). Between NFHS 3 & 4, the proportion of women delivering in institutions has

increased from 26.2 to 80.8%, yet, in rural areas about one in four women still deliver at home.

In absolute terms, this amounts to a significant number of domiciliary deliveries. As per the HMIS (2015-16), over one lakh women delivered at home in the state of Madhya Pradesh, and this

is most likely an under-enumeration, as the HMIS data consistently under-reports home

deliveries.2 Further, it is a matter of grave concern that only about 20% of home deliveries were attended by a skilled birth attendant. This suggests that home deliveries, although prevalent are being left out of the system simply because the women do not reach institutions.

Recognizing that a significant proportion of deliveries continue to take place at home, there is a need for greater programmatic attention to attend to home deliveries and ensure that they are provided adequate assistance, irrespective of where they occur.

Preparedness of InstitutionsDespite the dramatic increase in institutional delivery, one finds that the health institutions have not been able to keep pace and are ill-prepared to deal with increased caseloads. This is reflected in the RHS data which, as per the folling graphs, shows that there is a shortfall of both infrastructure and human resources in the state. In terms of the Sub-centers and PHCs, the shortfall increased from 2008 to 2012 but remained almost constant till 2015. The number of nurses has been rapidly increasing and even the number of doctors at PHCs showed growth from 2008 to 2012, which shows that the issue was recently addressed. But the number fell again by 2015 highlighting that while the institutional deliveries have increased, the infrastructure and health personnel haven’t been able to catch up. What merits attention is the fact that the deficit in infrastructure

2 In the years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13, the AHS recorded home deliveries at 24%, 20% and 17% respectively, while the HMIS recorded a lower proportion of home births at 16%, 13% and 15% respectively.

and human resources is vis a vis life-saving emergency obstetric care services. The human resource deficit is largely in the provision of specialists. There is a shortfall of 80% specialist doctors which are critical for handling emergencies. The 8th Common Review Mission (2014) reports that out of 1412 functional delivery points in the state, 663 are functional as BEmONC facilities and 91 as CEmONC facilities. Of the 152 facilities that were designated as CEmONC facilities, only 91 are functional due to lack of various services. For instance, only 42 of these facilities have a blood bank and 75 others have a blood storage unit. The remaining 35 have no blood availability and so they cannot provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care services.

The report also notes that facilities below the district hospital lack infrastructure and trained human

resources, and in these facilities intrapartum and delivery care protocols are not followed consistently. Further, there are gaps in the competence of service providers, for instance, most ANMs and staff nurses handling delivery cases were not SBA trained. This is also substantiated by literature which shows the poor level of competence of even birth attendant trained nurses in managing obstetric emergencies.3 Referral

ambulance services which are critical for emergency care are also reported to be deficient. The RHS 2014-15 notes that out of the 1171 functional PHCs in the state, only one-third have a referral transport system in place. The deficit in emergency services is a critical gap and is perhaps the reason why the decline in MMR has been slow despite the high proportion of institutional deliveries.

3 Chaturvedi S., Upadhyay S., De Costa A. (2012). Competence of birth attendants at providing emergency obstetric care under India’s JSY conditional cash transfer program for institutional delivery: an assessment using case vignettes in Madhya Pradesh province. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:174

Registration of pregnant women for ANC – 92.2% (NFHS 4 - 2015-16) out of which:

a) 53% -Antenatal check-up in the 1st trimester

b) 36% - received 4 or more check-ups

[DLHS 3 (2007-08) showed only 61% of women received Any ANC and only 34% received it in the first trimester]

As per the AHS 2012-13, in districts like Dindori, Sidhi, and Damoh, close to 50 % of women continue to deliver at home.

663 functional delivery points, less than half of the total 1412, are functional as BEmONC units. 35 of the 152 designated CEmONC facilities have no blood availability which renders them incapable of providing comprehensive emergency obstetric care.

Source: NFHS 4 (2015-16)

92.2

53.1

35.7

11.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

No. of registered pregnancies

Mothers with antenatal check-up in first

trimester

Mothers with at least 4 ANC visits

Mothers with full ANC

Antenatal Care Indicators (%)

Antenatal Care Indicators (%)

Source: HMIS (various years)

2008 2012 2015Source: RHS (various years)

Source: RHS (various years)

70.3

9.3

79.6

28.5 29.5

79.9

-3.4

14.7

80.4

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Nurses at PHC and CHC Doctors at PHC Total specialists at CHC

Shortfall in Human Resources (%)

2008 2012 2015

1,52,3271,42,071

1,19,6851,10,047

38,79443,121

33,73723,250

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

1,00,000

1,20,000

1,40,000

1,60,000

HMIS (2012-13)

HMIS (2013-14)

HMIS (2014-15)

HMIS (2015-16)

Home Deliveries Attended by Skilled Birth Attendant (SBA)

(Doctor/Nurse/Auxiliary Nurse Midwife [ANM])

Number of Home Deliveries

Number of Home Deliveries attended by SBA trained (Doctor/Nurse/ANM)

15

31.1

35.2

27.9

41.5

32.5

26

41.2

32.8

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Sub Centre Primary Health Centre Community Health Centre

Shortfall in Health Infrastructure (%)

2008 2012 2015

Page | 2 Page | 3 Page | 4